@checkstack/integration-jira-common 0.0.4 → 0.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +75 -0
- package/package.json +2 -1
- package/src/rpc-contract.ts +11 -10
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,80 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# @checkstack/integration-jira-common
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
+
## 0.1.0
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### Minor Changes
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- 9faec1f: # Unified AccessRule Terminology Refactoring
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
This release completes a comprehensive terminology refactoring from "permission" to "accessRule" across the entire codebase, establishing a consistent and modern access control vocabulary.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Changes
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Core Infrastructure (`@checkstack/common`)
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- Introduced `AccessRule` interface as the primary access control type
|
|
16
|
+
- Added `accessPair()` helper for creating read/manage access rule pairs
|
|
17
|
+
- Added `access()` builder for individual access rules
|
|
18
|
+
- Replaced `Permission` type with `AccessRule` throughout
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
### API Changes
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- `env.registerPermissions()` → `env.registerAccessRules()`
|
|
23
|
+
- `meta.permissions` → `meta.access` in RPC contracts
|
|
24
|
+
- `usePermission()` → `useAccess()` in frontend hooks
|
|
25
|
+
- Route `permission:` field → `accessRule:` field
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### UI Changes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
- "Roles & Permissions" tab → "Roles & Access Rules"
|
|
30
|
+
- "You don't have permission..." → "You don't have access..."
|
|
31
|
+
- All permission-related UI text updated
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Documentation & Templates
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- Updated 18 documentation files with AccessRule terminology
|
|
36
|
+
- Updated 7 scaffolding templates with `accessPair()` pattern
|
|
37
|
+
- All code examples use new AccessRule API
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Migration Guide
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Backend Plugins
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
```diff
|
|
44
|
+
- import { permissionList } from "./permissions";
|
|
45
|
+
- env.registerPermissions(permissionList);
|
|
46
|
+
+ import { accessRules } from "./access";
|
|
47
|
+
+ env.registerAccessRules(accessRules);
|
|
48
|
+
```
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### RPC Contracts
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
```diff
|
|
53
|
+
- .meta({ userType: "user", permissions: [permissions.read.id] })
|
|
54
|
+
+ .meta({ userType: "user", access: [access.read] })
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### Frontend Hooks
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
```diff
|
|
60
|
+
- const canRead = accessApi.usePermission(permissions.read.id);
|
|
61
|
+
+ const canRead = accessApi.useAccess(access.read);
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Routes
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
```diff
|
|
67
|
+
- permission: permissions.entityRead.id,
|
|
68
|
+
+ accessRule: access.read,
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Patch Changes
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- Updated dependencies [9faec1f]
|
|
74
|
+
- Updated dependencies [f533141]
|
|
75
|
+
- @checkstack/common@0.2.0
|
|
76
|
+
- @checkstack/integration-common@0.1.0
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
3
78
|
## 0.0.4
|
|
4
79
|
|
|
5
80
|
### Patch Changes
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@checkstack/integration-jira-common",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"type": "module",
|
|
5
5
|
"main": "src/index.ts",
|
|
6
6
|
"scripts": {
|
|
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
|
|
|
10
10
|
},
|
|
11
11
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
12
12
|
"@checkstack/common": "workspace:*",
|
|
13
|
+
"@checkstack/integration-common": "workspace:*",
|
|
13
14
|
"@orpc/contract": "^1.13.2",
|
|
14
15
|
"zod": "^4.2.1"
|
|
15
16
|
},
|
package/src/rpc-contract.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import {
|
|
|
5
5
|
createClientDefinition,
|
|
6
6
|
type ProcedureMetadata,
|
|
7
7
|
} from "@checkstack/common";
|
|
8
|
+
import { integrationAccess } from "@checkstack/integration-common";
|
|
8
9
|
import {
|
|
9
10
|
JiraConnectionRedactedSchema,
|
|
10
11
|
CreateJiraConnectionInputSchema,
|
|
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
30
31
|
listConnections: _base
|
|
31
32
|
.meta({
|
|
32
33
|
userType: "user",
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
34
35
|
})
|
|
35
36
|
.output(z.array(JiraConnectionRedactedSchema)),
|
|
36
37
|
|
|
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
38
39
|
getConnection: _base
|
|
39
40
|
.meta({
|
|
40
41
|
userType: "user",
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
42
43
|
})
|
|
43
44
|
.input(z.object({ id: z.string() }))
|
|
44
45
|
.output(JiraConnectionRedactedSchema),
|
|
@@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
47
48
|
createConnection: _base
|
|
48
49
|
.meta({
|
|
49
50
|
userType: "user",
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
51
52
|
})
|
|
52
53
|
.input(CreateJiraConnectionInputSchema)
|
|
53
54
|
.output(JiraConnectionRedactedSchema),
|
|
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
56
57
|
updateConnection: _base
|
|
57
58
|
.meta({
|
|
58
59
|
userType: "user",
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
60
61
|
})
|
|
61
62
|
.input(UpdateJiraConnectionInputSchema)
|
|
62
63
|
.output(JiraConnectionRedactedSchema),
|
|
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
65
66
|
deleteConnection: _base
|
|
66
67
|
.meta({
|
|
67
68
|
userType: "user",
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
69
70
|
})
|
|
70
71
|
.input(z.object({ id: z.string() }))
|
|
71
72
|
.output(z.object({ success: z.boolean() })),
|
|
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
74
75
|
testConnection: _base
|
|
75
76
|
.meta({
|
|
76
77
|
userType: "user",
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
78
79
|
})
|
|
79
80
|
.input(z.object({ id: z.string() }))
|
|
80
81
|
.output(
|
|
@@ -92,7 +93,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
92
93
|
getProjects: _base
|
|
93
94
|
.meta({
|
|
94
95
|
userType: "user",
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
96
97
|
})
|
|
97
98
|
.input(z.object({ connectionId: z.string() }))
|
|
98
99
|
.output(z.array(JiraProjectSchema)),
|
|
@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
101
102
|
getIssueTypes: _base
|
|
102
103
|
.meta({
|
|
103
104
|
userType: "user",
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
105
106
|
})
|
|
106
107
|
.input(
|
|
107
108
|
z.object({
|
|
@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
115
116
|
getFields: _base
|
|
116
117
|
.meta({
|
|
117
118
|
userType: "user",
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
119
120
|
})
|
|
120
121
|
.input(
|
|
121
122
|
z.object({
|
|
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ export const jiraContract = {
|
|
|
130
131
|
getPriorities: _base
|
|
131
132
|
.meta({
|
|
132
133
|
userType: "user",
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
+
access: [integrationAccess.manage],
|
|
134
135
|
})
|
|
135
136
|
.input(z.object({ connectionId: z.string() }))
|
|
136
137
|
.output(
|