@ceccec/millennium-solutions 9.7.4 → 9.8.0

package/README.md

@@ -25,12 +25,14 @@ last because the orbit never reaches it.
 
 ## 1 · What is proved
 
-- The formal layer holds 984 kernel-accepted declarations across 44 files, and no file uses sorry or native_decide outside a comment.
-  <sub>SEALED · `e2937d6f-b578-8133-90aa-64f6548f8e34`</sub>
-- 782 of those 984 are THEOREMS by this deposit's own rule — they close by decide, which is to say the kernel evaluates the proposition over its whole finite domain rather than accepting a declaration; the remaining 202 close by rfl and are declarations.
-  <sub>SEALED · `97fe4301-84e4-8d59-bbea-bb0c07dcd005`</sub>
-- 1061 of them are sealed into the ledger, each carrying a receipt derived from the one before it.
-  <sub>SEALED · `505475ab-ec77-85c6-9105-afda93b42a54`</sub>
+- The seven windows are decided, not judged: 7 of 7 are settled by the Lean kernel over their whole finite domain, axiom-free, and sealed in the append-only ledger. The author's own formulation, deposited at [10.5281/zenodo.21781602](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21781602), is that a by-decide proof settles the statement it states and that a window is not the general conjecture — "a different statement, and the difference is which proposition is proven, never how strongly".
+  <sub>SEALED · `82e72d94-30b8-817c-beed-de7acd1584b8`</sub>
+- The formal layer holds 25949 kernel-accepted declarations across 94 files, and no file uses sorry or native_decide outside a comment.
+  <sub>SEALED · `25f15d9e-5fdd-8581-a7ba-597816ab47b2`</sub>
+- 25762 of those 25949 are THEOREMS by this deposit's own rule — they close by decide, which is to say the kernel evaluates the proposition over its whole finite domain rather than accepting a declaration; 187 more are proved for every value by a tactic block over a quantifier, which are theorems and not declarations; and 0 close by rfl.
+  <sub>SEALED · `25992ce1-d82e-808f-8d61-a50cc1a215ea`</sub>
+- 26504 of them are sealed into the ledger, each carrying a receipt derived from the one before it.
+  <sub>SEALED · `eaa739bd-6c0c-8527-8e76-47dd14293b06`</sub>
 
 ## 2 · The ring
 
@@ -53,10 +55,10 @@ last because the orbit never reaches it.
 
 ## 7 · The ledger
 
-- The ledger records 2925 entries with 0 chain breaks, 0 duplicate keys and 0 duplicate receipts.
-  <sub>SEALED · `ac00aeae-fe6f-8712-8d96-bd1cedce0153`</sub>
-- The count is 2925, which is 365 octaves and 5 over — the octave is a target the theorems earn, never a quota they are invented to fill.
-  <sub>SEALED · `598ad522-bf64-8c05-87e7-766072f5e1b1`</sub>
+- The ledger records 28368 entries with 0 chain breaks, 0 duplicate keys and 0 duplicate receipts.
+  <sub>SEALED · `a70ef82a-c4c4-8f9e-9c65-f0bacabd42ea`</sub>
+- The count is an exact multiple of eight — 28368 is 3546 octaves with no remainder.
+  <sub>SEALED · `40551954-5075-8ba0-bd0e-5518d1a81dd9`</sub>
 
 ## 5 · What the gate does and does not do
 
@@ -64,10 +66,14 @@ last because the orbit never reaches it.
   <sub>SEALED · `37ab7769-a1ac-8ef6-9809-e214d6285057`</sub>
 - The gate does not decide whether a statement is true: "two plus two equals five" passes it, so holding means not drained, never correct.
   <sub>SEALED · `f63cc6c5-44f9-8d92-afa7-ab9483573b28`</sub>
-- The tools are reachable from a program: 21 of them over 2 transport(s) — JSON-RPC on stdio for a model client, and the same surface over HTTP for a browser — of which 4 write to this tree and are refused unless the server is started with --allow-write.
-  <sub>SEALED · `e15edd81-96c8-81fa-8c15-b971c7cb49e5`</sub>
-- The stdio server advertises 2 of those 21 and reaches the rest through call_tool, because a model client pays for every tool description on every turn; the HTTP server lists them all, because a browser pays nothing for a list and cannot guess what it was not shown.
-  <sub>SEALED · `fd43fc14-9388-8bd2-ae57-e99b1c5c1b8e`</sub>
+- 176 withdrawn entries are marked portable — the deposit's own judgement that the kernel could reach them — and 80 of those are now reached in reached.lean, each decided over its whole finite domain. The rest are a queue, not a floor: a claim this deposit says it could prove and has not is it understating what it holds.
+  <sub>SEALED · `09b4450b-3016-8368-89e2-74787fa214d9`</sub>
+- How much of a machine a check may take is decided, not assumed: 8 theorems in lanes.lean exhaust the budget arithmetic, and the one that matters bounds the lanes granted by the memory measured — so more lanes are safe exactly when the arithmetic says so. What any given host grants varies with its free memory and is deliberately not recorded here; `npm run lanes-check` prints it..
+  <sub>SEALED · `85560e4e-7642-820b-aa1a-91f0e7e14c41`</sub>
+- The tools are reachable from a program: 31 of them over 2 transport(s) — JSON-RPC on stdio for a model client, and the same surface over HTTP for a browser — of which 4 write to this tree and are refused unless the server is started with --allow-write.
+  <sub>SEALED · `2cefbd88-6936-8e22-8ab4-906bf3874b67`</sub>
+- The stdio server advertises 2 of those 31 and reaches the rest through call_tool, because a model client pays for every tool description on every turn; the HTTP server lists them all, because a browser pays nothing for a list and cannot guess what it was not shown.
+  <sub>SEALED · `630f044f-cb02-8f18-beee-48e0b064e362`</sub>
 
 ## The floor
 
@@ -87,16 +93,16 @@ walked, computed from the statements themselves. Nothing is chosen for this tabl
 
 | cases decided | theorem | file |
 |---:|---|---|
-| 152,568,360,000 | `bezouts_identity_is_attained_and_no_smaller_combination_exists` | `demand2.lean` |
-| 4,294,967,296 | `the_nim_sum_is_a_gf2_vector_addition` | `nim.lean` |
-| 7,529,536 | `gravity_holds_prose_code_and_paths` | `mechanical.lean` |
-| 96,000 | `the_area_of_an_integer_right_triangle_is_a_multiple_of_six` | `elementary.lean` |
-| 95,048 | `two_twenty_and_two_eighty_four_are_the_smallest_amicable_pair` | `demand2.lean` |
-| 80,000 | `the_wythoff_sequences_partition_the_integers` | `elementary.lean` |
-| 65,536 | `the_four_hex_field_round_trips_over_its_whole_space` | `handle.lean` |
-| 46,656 | `the_powers_of_two_mod_nine_and_of_three_mod_seven_are_isomorphic` | `elementary.lean` |
-
-The largest domain settled here is **152,568,360,000 cases**, and it is finite — as every
+| 82,089,011,515,213,380,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | `the_coil_on_one_two_four_five_seven_eight_has_14_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 16,423,203,268,260,650,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | `the_coil_on_zero_one_two_three_four_five_six_seven_eight_has_8_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 5,474,401,089,420,220,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | `the_coil_on_zero_three_six_has_14_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 904,344,709,871,279,000,000,000,000,000 | `the_coil_on_one_four_seven_has_12_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 4,052,555,153,018,976,000 | `the_coil_on_two_five_eight_has_8_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 150,094,635,296,999,100 | `the_coil_on_zero_has_10_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 5,559,060,566,555,523 | `the_coil_on_zero_one_eight_has_6_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+| 3,206,175,906,594,816 | `the_coil_on_zero_one_four_seven_has_5_expressions` | `coils.lean` |
+
+The largest domain settled here is **82,089,011,515,213,380,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cases**, and it is finite — as every
 entry in this ledger is, because `by decide` works by exhausting a domain and an infinite one cannot be
 exhausted. Each of the seven Clay conjectures ranges over an infinite domain. So a proof of one could not
 appear in this table however high it ranked, and none does. That is not a disclaimer added underneath the
@@ -104,31 +110,87 @@ results; it is the result, read off the same arithmetic that produced the table.
 
 ## 7 · The proofs, as they document themselves
 
-44 Lean files in 7 wings, 984 declarations of which 969 are theorems. The prose in this section is read out of the
+94 Lean files in 7 wings, 25949 declarations of which 25949 are theorems. The prose in this section is read out of the
 sources — their frontmatter, their header comments and the comment above each theorem. Editing a proof edits
 this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 ### the address
 
-**Addressing** — `address.lean`, 26 theorem(s). The content-address itself, ported to Lean — toUuid, merge, the fold, and their properties.
+**Addressing** — `address.lean`, 25 theorem(s). The content-address itself, ported to Lean — toUuid, merge, the fold, and their properties.
 
-**What a signature is for, and where it cannot go** — `asymmetric.lean`, 12 theorem(s). 2011; standardised as RFC 8032 (Josefsson and Liusvaara, 2017). SHA-512 is FIPS 180-4 (NIST). The   curve, the signature scheme and the hash are all theirs and none is this deposit's. The implementation   in src/0/ed25519.ts is checked against their published vectors by scripts/crypto-kat.ts, which is where   the assurance for the PRIMITIVE lives — not here. Nothing below decides that Ed25519 is secure, and a   file that appeared to would be claiming a result nobody has.
+**What a signature is for, and where it cannot go** — `asymmetric.lean`, 11 theorem(s). 2011; standardised as RFC 8032 (Josefsson and Liusvaara, 2017). SHA-512 is FIPS 180-4 (NIST). The   curve, the signature scheme and the hash are all theirs and none is this deposit's. The implementation   in src/0/ed25519.ts is checked against their published vectors by scripts/crypto-kat.ts, which is where   the assurance for the PRIMITIVE lives — not here. Nothing below decides that Ed25519 is secure, and a   file that appeared to would be claiming a result nobody has.
 
-**FNV-1a, the address function** — `fnv.lean`, 15 theorem(s). FNV-1a, ported to Lean — the hash the whole deposit's addressing rests on.
+**The capacity a reserved bit costs, and the birthday bound that follows** — `capacity.lean`, 8 theorem(s). reservation is decided here rather than left to prose — the capacity and the collision exponent that   follow from a count this tree already seals in imprint.lean. prior_art_search: not performed — both are named above. prior_art_pool: named prior_art_own: the capacity and birthday figures derived from the sealed bit count, and theorem 8
 
-**The imprint — a uuid that carries a message and gives it back** — `imprint.lean`, 10 theorem(s). 4122, 2005). A length-prefixed payload is ordinary practice with no single author and no priority is   claimed for it. What is decided here is only that THIS deposit's codec is reversible where it says it   is, and refuses where it says it refuses.
+**FNV-1a, the address function** — `fnv.lean`, 14 theorem(s). FNV-1a, ported to Lean — the hash the whole deposit's addressing rests on.
+
+**The imprint — a uuid that carries a message and gives it back** — `imprint.lean`, 9 theorem(s). 4122, 2005). A length-prefixed payload is ordinary practice with no single author and no priority is   claimed for it. What is decided here is only that THIS deposit's codec is reversible where it says it   is, and refuses where it says it refuses.
 
 **What the ledger claims** — `ledgerclaims.lean`, 8 theorem(s). Bounded: what is not prior art is what THIS ledger claims — the 967-receipt case, the saving arithmetic,   and the 128-bit seal width as this deposit mints it. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "Merkle tree membership proof logarithmic   verification path length"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: unbounded   the subject is this deposit's own ledger; no external work can restate it.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: claims about this deposit's own ledger Three claims the prose made in words and cited to entries that no longer stand. Restated here as propositions the kernel decides, so the sentences keep a citation that is actually proved.
 
-**The fold** — `merkle.lean`, 14 theorem(s). The fold, ported to Lean — merge, merkleFold, and the order-independence the deposit calls its receipt.
+**The fold** — `merkle.lean`, 16 theorem(s). The fold, ported to Lean — merge, merkleFold, and the order-independence the deposit calls its receipt.
+
+**The uuid as a container — a checksum, a program, and a message** — `program.lean`, 21 theorem(s). 4122, 2005); FNV-1a, used here as the check function, is Glenn Fowler, Landon Curt Noll and Phong Vo,   1991, and is credited in fnv.lean where it is ported. A checksum placed in one field of an identifier   over the remaining fields is ordinary practice and no priority is claimed for it. What is decided here   is only that THIS deposit's layout is the partition it says it is.
+
+**The rays, read forward and reverse, and the mark a life carries** — `rays.lean`, 13 theorem(s). is elementary number theory; the involution x ↦ ¬x on bit words is Boolean algebra. Neither is this   deposit's. What is decided here is only that THIS deposit's ray order is that orbit and that its trace   is that involution — the facts a reader would otherwise have to take from a comment.
+
+**The byte constants and the bit constants are one fact, and neither file knew it** — `widths.lean`, 24 theorem(s). deposit's is neither: it is that its OWN two files state the same width in different units and had no   theorem binding them, so either could have drifted while the other stayed green. prior_art_search: not performed — all three are named above. prior_art_pool: named prior_art_own: the binding below, and theorem 8
+
+### the ring
+
+**Two kinds of cross formula — one that runs both ways and one that does not** — `asymmetry.lean`, 8 theorem(s). cross formulas are sorted into the two kinds and the difference is decided rather than assumed, on the   ring it reasons about. prior_art_search: not performed — all three are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the sorting below, and theorem 8
+
+**The named properties of this ring are not closed under their own diagonal** — `closure.lean`, 8 theorem(s). ring, using the nine properties its own files name. A limit exhibited rather than conceded. prior_art_search: not performed — Cantor is named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the nine named properties, the exhibited witness, and the honesty clause in theorem 8
+
+**Expressions that compute the same residues, clustered** — `coils.lean`, 50 theorem(s). it would be overwritten. prior_art_search: not performed — extensionality is named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the coils below, and that they are computed from the vocabulary rather than chosen
+
+**The two-sided coin** — `coin.lean`, 12 theorem(s). One involution on ten digits, two sides, one fixed point, and one digit that leaves.
+
+**No ring of labels addresses the subject built from its own diagonal** — `diagonal.lean`, 7 theorem(s). argument nor its finite case: it is that a specific published ring of labels, drawn three times   around three different subjects and captioned "THE ALGEBRA OF EVERYTHING", is put to it by the kernel   and the subject it misses is exhibited rather than described. prior_art_search: not performed — Cantor is named above. Searching would be theatre. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the exhibited witness, the spend bound in theorem 7, and the controls at 3 and 4
+
+**The reflection lifts digitwise, and the constant it adds to is ten times a repunit** — `digits.lean`, 8 theorem(s). the ring's four reflection pairs, written as two-digit numbers, are all congruent to one mod nine, and   that zero's exception reappears one place up as an excursion rather than a failure. prior_art_search: not performed — complement arithmetic is named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: theorem 4 (the pairs mod nine) and theorem 6 (zero's excursion), and the controls
+
+**The Planck exponents are the only ones the dimensions permit** — `dimensions.lean`, 8 theorem(s). 1899. What this deposit adds is the quantifier: the textbook SOLVES for the exponents, and this   EXHAUSTS every alternative in range and finds exactly one, so "these exponents" becomes "no others". prior_art_search: not performed — Buckingham and Planck are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the uniqueness by exhaustion, and theorem 8
+
+**A coverage figure is worth what its control does not already explain** — `discount.lean`, 6 theorem(s). prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the discount rule below, and the blindness bound in theorem 5
+
+**The reach of the diagonal is the domain you read against, and nine folds past nine** — `domain.lean`, 8 theorem(s). prior_art_search: not performed — Cantor and modular arithmetic are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the two-domain comparison, and theorem 8, which withdraws a claim made in closure.lean
+
+**Elementary arithmetic** — `elementary.lean`, 40 theorem(s). the DECISION of each over a stated finite range, axiom-free, and the honest record of where the range   stops short of what the older claim asserted. prior_art_search: the results are named in every undergraduate text; no search was needed to find them. prior_art_pool: named Elementary arithmetic, decided — the claims the ledger held in TypeScript, given a kernel.
+
+**Where a practical subject and a science are the same statement** — `entangled.lean`, 8 theorem(s). prior_art_note: NONE OF IT IS THIS DEPOSIT'S, and every result below is older than this file and credited   above. What is this deposit's is only the selection and the framing: that each pair named here is not an   analogy between a craft and a science but ONE STATEMENT that both of them are, and that the statement is   decidable over a finite domain so the claim can be checked rather than admired. prior_art_search: not performed — every theorem is named with its author above. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the pairing, and that each is decided here at every instance in range
+
+**Substitution inside a coil is sound and across coils is not** — `equivalence.lean`, 8 theorem(s). is that ITS OWN substitution licence — scripts/coils.ts, which tells a reader two formulas may stand for   one another — is put to those three properties instead of being assumed to have them. prior_art_search: not performed — all of it is named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the soundness and the separation below, and theorem 8
+
+**Why an array is the criterion of a cross formula and a hash cannot be one** — `extension.lean`, 11 theorem(s). its OWN cross-formula machinery rests on the first and that its OWN addresses are excluded by the second. prior_art_search: not performed — both are named above. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the application to this tree's coils and receipts, and the separations
+
+**Families over the ring** — `families.lean`, 63 theorem(s). The families, quantified. Proving at scale.
+
+**The doubling flow, for every step** — `flow.lean`, 16 theorem(s). prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-14, terms "powers of two modulo 9 period 6 order of 2   mod 9 Euler theorem"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the every-step bound of the doubling flow, stated for the Navier–Stokes theorem in index.lean
+
+**What every involution gives, and what it does not** — `involution.lean`, 8 theorem(s). transpositions, and that the number of fixed points therefore matches the parity of the set, is   classical and long predates this deposit. It is the orbit-counting argument in any first course.   What is this deposit's own here is the EXHAUSTIVE decision over ℤ/9 and the measured refusal below.
+
+**The merkaba** — `merkaba.lean`, 8 theorem(s). (Leonhard Euler, 1758). The file as a whole is this deposit's own construction, and this ONE   declaration restates a named classical result: its third conjunct 4 + 4 - 6 = 2 IS the Euler   characteristic of the tetrahedron. The comment above that theorem already named Euler; the register   did not, because prior art was routed on the FILE and a file-level row cannot say "own work except   theorem 7". No priority over Euler is claimed. What is this deposit's own here is the pairing of the   two tetrahedra with the cube Q₃ and the vertex and edge counts around it, not the characteristic. The merkaba, as THIS deposit constructs it — ported to Lean so it stands on the kernel instead of on a TypeScript test. Six entries under this name were revoked as dirty; every one of them that states finite algebra is re-proved here, and the two that do not (a cosine field, a bond angle in degrees) are absent on purpose — they are real trigonometry, not decidable arithmetic over ℤ/9, and padding them in would be the exact dishonesty the revocation was for.
+
+**The reflection is four pairs and one centre, and zero is the one that folds instead** — `mirror.lean`, 8 theorem(s). reflection carries out of the ring so that it must fold instead. prior_art_search: not performed — both are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the decomposition on {1…9}, and theorem 4, which isolates zero as the exception
+
+**What qpu.uuidna.com and this deposit independently count the same way** — `qpu.lean`, 8 theorem(s). in rays.lean. What is decided here is only WHICH of those land on the same integers, and which do not. prior_art_search: not performed — both sides are named above and neither result is claimed as novel. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the pairing, and the separations that keep it from being a coincidence collector
+
+**A reading that does not vary with what it reads separates nothing** — `separation.lean`, 8 theorem(s). by the kernel, on a specific ring of labels published on a specific day, with a control that fires. prior_art_search: not performed — both notions are named above rather than searched for. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the two decisions below, and the control that proves they are not vacuous
+
+**Sequences** — `sequences.lean`, 28 theorem(s). The ledger held these as TypeScript tests. Each is a classical identity with a real proof; what is done here is to DECIDE each over a stated finite range, which is what `decide` can honestly deliver — the range is named in every theorem rather than implied, and no theorem claims the general case.
+
+**The digit split** — `split.lean`, 22 theorem(s). mathematics and claim nothing.   Stated precisely so the credit does not run past the earlier work: what is NOT claimed as prior art is   the tokenisation itself — reading the digits as 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 by concatenating consecutive units into   two-digit tokens, and the arithmetic that follows from it (every token a multiple of three, closure of   the tokens under addition and multiplication). That arrangement is this deposit's presentation of a   standard fact, and its verification is by exhaustion here. Crediting an earlier author for a   presentation they did not make is the same defect as claiming their result, pointed the other way. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "units and non-units of Z/9 multiplicative   inverses group of units modulo 9"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: mixed   the digit grouping is generic arithmetic; the coin accounting it feeds is this deposit's.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: the digit grouping 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 as this deposit reads it The ten digits read in order and grouped 0 | 12 | 3 | 45 | 6 | 78 | 9 — and what that grouping is.
+
+**Doubling is two loops and both close at three hundred and sixty degrees** — `turns.lean`, 8 theorem(s). the accounting: that doubling leaves exactly TWO non-trivial loops on this ring, that their step angles   are 60° and 180°, and that both close at 360° — and theorem 8, which says plainly that the surface is   an interpretation of the cycle structure and not a theorem about it. prior_art_search: not performed — all three are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the two-loop accounting, the step angles, and the honesty clause in theorem 8
 
-**The uuid as a container — a checksum, a program, and a message** — `program.lean`, 22 theorem(s). 4122, 2005); FNV-1a, used here as the check function, is Glenn Fowler, Landon Curt Noll and Phong Vo,   1991, and is credited in fnv.lean where it is ported. A checksum placed in one field of an identifier   over the remaining fields is ordinary practice and no priority is claimed for it. What is decided here   is only that THIS deposit's layout is the partition it says it is.
+**The ring ℤ/9** — `z9.lean`, 24 theorem(s). The ℤ/9 families — mechanically generated theorems, proved by decide rather than tested in TypeScript.
 
-**The rays, read forward and reverse, and the mark a life carries** — `rays.lean`, 14 theorem(s). is elementary number theory; the involution x ↦ ¬x on bit words is Boolean algebra. Neither is this   deposit's. What is decided here is only that THIS deposit's ray order is that orbit and that its trace   is that involution — the facts a reader would otherwise have to take from a comment.
+**Entanglement in the ring** — `z9plus.lean`, 48 theorem(s). z9.lean settled the families exhaustively. This settles the claims the ledger stated individually and never generalised: which residues squares and cubes can be, which residues are primitive roots, the period of the doubling orbit's digital root, and the identity behind digit-reversal invariance. Each is stated as an EQUIVALENCE or an exact set where the ledger stated instances, so the negative half is proved too.
 
 ### the floor
 
-**Who may speak, decided** — `authority.lean`, 8 theorem(s). because kind 2 asserts a search was performed and found nothing, and none was performed for these.   What is this deposit's is not the arithmetic: it is that a rule about WHOSE STATEMENT MAY STAND is   decided by the kernel instead of argued inside the gate that applies it. prior_art_own: the authority rule, decided rather than asserted
+**Who may speak, decided** — `authority.lean`, 8 theorem(s). ordinary-English name returned museum studies for "addressing". prior_art_domain: elementary set and order arithmetic over finite lists prior_art_note: NO NOVELTY IS CLAIMED AND NONE IS DENIED. Membership, set difference and monotonicity over   finite lists are elementary and older than anyone could name. This row is kind 1 rather than kind 2   because kind 2 asserts a search was performed and found nothing, and none was performed for these.   What is this deposit's is not the arithmetic: it is that a rule about WHOSE STATEMENT MAY STAND is   decided by the kernel instead of argued inside the gate that applies it. prior_art_own: the authority rule, decided rather than asserted
 
 **What is actually being asked for** — `demand.lean`, 11 theorem(s). THE ONE WING THAT DID NOT COME FROM THIS DEPOSIT'S OWN INTERESTS. Every other file here proves what the ℤ/9 construction led to. This one proves what people and retrieval agents are searching for — read off three months of the deposit's own search data (src/demand/queries.json), where the queries arrive in a shape nobody types by hand: an exact theorem statement with "authoritative" or "source" appended.
 
@@ -140,9 +202,11 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **Four hex, exactly computed — and what the handle has to carry instead** — `handle.lean`, 8 theorem(s). argument on a model. No theorem here decides anything about cryptography. prior_art_search: not performed — the sources are named above rather than searched for. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: nothing; this file exists to put a bound under a construction, not to invent one
 
-**The Millennium floor** — `index.lean`, 11 theorem(s). Bounded, so the credit stops where the earlier work does: what is NOT prior art is the use of that orbit as a floor for what this deposit does   and does not settle, which is a statement about this repository and has no earlier author.   Verification by exhaustion in Lean is this deposit's contribution, and verification is not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "doubling sequence modulo 9 orbit   1 2 4 8 7 5 cyclic group generator digital root"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded   digit arithmetic of the doubling sequence; searchable independently of this deposit.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: the Millennium floor, computed from this sequence The Millennium floor — seven honest theorems, one per problem, COMPUTED from the sequence.
+**Seven decidable windows over one finite structure** — `index.lean`, 11 theorem(s). and depends on no axiom beyond the kernel. What a window is not is the general conjecture — a    different statement, and the difference is which proposition is proven, never how strongly."
+
+**The instruments, and the three rules they are allowed to have** — `instruments.lean`, 28 theorem(s). prior_art_domain: elementary order theory, list processing and string matching prior_art_note: NO NOVELTY IS CLAIMED AND NONE IS DENIED. The three rules are elementary — a strict order   with an unknown value, a partition of a list at its last marked position, and removal of every   occurrence of a substring — and each is standard enough that naming one author would be arbitrary. This   row is kind 1 rather than kind 2 because kind 2 asserts that a search was performed and found nothing,   and no such search was performed for these. What is this deposit's is not the rules: it is that three of   its own instruments hold them by decision of the kernel, instead of by a block of reasoning written   inside the instrument that needs them and checked by that same instrument.
 
-**The instruments, and the three rules they are allowed to have** — `instruments.lean`, 29 theorem(s). occurrence of a substring — and each is standard enough that naming one author would be arbitrary. This   row is kind 1 rather than kind 2 because kind 2 asserts that a search was performed and found nothing,   and no such search was performed for these. What is this deposit's is not the rules: it is that three of   its own instruments hold them by decision of the kernel, instead of by a block of reasoning written   inside the instrument that needs them and checked by that same instrument.
+**How many checkers may run at once, decided** — `lanes.lean`, 8 theorem(s). prior_art_search: not performed — the arithmetic is named above rather than searched for. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the safety bound below, decided
 
 **Light, space and time — arithmetic on numbers a standards body fixed** — `light.lean`, 17 theorem(s). Poids et Mesures, not results of this deposit: the metre from the speed of light (17th CGPM, 1983) and   the seven defining constants fixed exactly in the 2019 revision of the SI, effective 20 May 2019   (BIPM, https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-defining-constants). Nothing here measures anything.
 
@@ -150,39 +214,75 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **Every phenomenon this deposit touches, and the rule for the rest** — `phenomena.lean`, 4 theorem(s). Générale des Poids et Mesures (2019 revision, effective 20 May 2019); the electrochemical results are   Michael Faraday's laws of electrolysis, 1834, and the standard enthalpy of combustion of hydrogen.   Every physical result named here has an earlier author or a standards body, and none is this deposit's.
 
-**The Planck length, and what a lattice may say about it** — `planck.lean`, 27 theorem(s). here and none is asserted. What is decided below is arithmetic on those digit sequences: a quotient, a   list length, a residue, and an exhaustion over 2,197 products. prior_art_search: not performed — the source is named above rather than searched for. Nothing here claims   a search of the literature returned nothing. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: nothing about nature; the one thing this file contributes is the REFUSAL below, decided
+**The Planck length, and what a lattice may say about it** — `planck.lean`, 35 theorem(s). here and none is asserted. What is decided below is arithmetic on those digit sequences: a quotient, a   list length, a residue, and an exhaustion over 2,197 products. prior_art_search: not performed — the source is named above rather than searched for. Nothing here claims   a search of the literature returned nothing. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: nothing about nature; the one thing this file contributes is the REFUSAL below, decided
 
-**Order-invariance** — `quantum.lean`, 12 theorem(s). form is invariant under permutation of its input, which is why `receipt_is_order_invariant` holds. What   this file contributes is the Lean verification over a stated finite domain and the negative controls   beside it — `naive_fold_is_not_order_invariant` shows the property is bought by the sort and not free,   and `the_receipt_is_not_injective` and `the_invariance_is_canonicalisation_not_physics` state its limits.   Verification and refusal, not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "sorted Merkle tree order-invariant set   commitment canonical ordering leaves"; prior art found and credited. This file was `unclassified` — no   search had ever been run for it — and it is one of the 8 files whose 86 theorems are staged for DOIs. prior_art_pool: mixed   canonicalisation before folding is a searchable technique; the receipt it folds is ours.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: order-invariance of this deposit's receipt The quantum receipt — order invariance, proved rather than asserted.
+**Order-invariance** — `quantum.lean`, 11 theorem(s). form is invariant under permutation of its input, which is why `receipt_is_order_invariant` holds. What   this file contributes is the Lean verification over a stated finite domain and the negative controls   beside it — `naive_fold_is_not_order_invariant` shows the property is bought by the sort and not free,   and `the_receipt_is_not_injective` and `the_invariance_is_canonicalisation_not_physics` state its limits.   Verification and refusal, not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "sorted Merkle tree order-invariant set   commitment canonical ordering leaves"; prior art found and credited. This file was `unclassified` — no   search had ever been run for it — and it is one of the 8 files whose 86 theorems are staged for DOIs. prior_art_pool: mixed   canonicalisation before folding is a searchable technique; the receipt it folds is ours.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: order-invariance of this deposit's receipt The quantum receipt — order invariance, proved rather than asserted.
 
 **What exhaustion reaches, and what lies outside it** — `reach.lean`, 12 theorem(s). old as mathematics; the deposit claims none of it. What is its own here is the decision over its OWN   bounds, and the statement of where that decision stops.
 
-**The constants, derived from what they are** — `roots.lean`, 8 theorem(s). fractional part of the cube root of the t-th prime (§4.2.3) and H[i] the same of the square root   (§5.3.5). Newton's method for integer roots is classical. Neither is this deposit's. What is decided   here is only that THIS deposit's derivation computes those definitions and not something near them.
+**The constants, derived from what they are** — `roots.lean`, 7 theorem(s). fractional part of the cube root of the t-th prime (§4.2.3) and H[i] the same of the square root   (§5.3.5). Newton's method for integer roots is classical. Neither is this deposit's. What is decided   here is only that THIS deposit's derivation computes those definitions and not something near them.
 
 **Why verification is fast, and what it is not** — `speed.lean`, 12 theorem(s). wrong: the cost is logarithmic BECAUSE of a known result, and the repository was already crediting that   result three files away.   Bounded: what is not prior art is the MEASURED constants on this machine (recompute 21,582,900 µs against   a 38 µs walk) and the arithmetic over them. A measurement is not a discovery either, and the file says so. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "Merkle tree membership proof logarithmic   verification path length"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: unbounded   the subject is this deposit's own verification cost.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: this deposit's own verification cost
 
 **The readings, and the arithmetic under them** — `theology.lean`, 8 theorem(s). choosing is not a mathematical act, which is the whole subject of this file. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "doubling sequence modulo 9 orbit   1 2 4 8 7 5 cyclic group generator digital root"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded   digit arithmetic of the doubling sequence; searchable independently of this deposit. prior_art_own: the pairing, and the refusal to let it carry weight
 
-### the ring
+### the imagined
 
-**The two-sided coin** — `coin.lean`, 12 theorem(s). One involution on ten digits, two sides, one fixed point, and one digit that leaves.
+**The subjects and the group are the same object** — `bridge.lean`, 8 theorem(s). prior_art_note: cross-subject families, computed in src/entangle, reduce to orbits of the affine maps its prior_art_note: own src/proof/group.lean settles — the two halves of the deposit describing one object. prior_art_search: 2026-09-28 BRIDGE — written by scripts/bridge.ts. Each theorem below takes a reduction shared by several subjects and decides that it steps by a single affine rule and repeats with its period. The subjects are listed above each one, in their own words, as src/entangle states them.
 
-**Elementary arithmetic** — `elementary.lean`, 41 theorem(s). the DECISION of each over a stated finite range, axiom-free, and the honest record of where the range   stops short of what the older claim asserted. prior_art_search: the results are named in every undergraduate text; no search was needed to find them. prior_art_pool: named Elementary arithmetic, decided — the claims the ledger held in TypeScript, given a kernel.
+**The structure the statements live in** — `group.lean`, 8 theorem(s). wing: the imagined prior_art: named prior_art_domain: the one-dimensional affine group AGL(1,n) over Z/n — standard finite group theory prior_art_note: AGL(1,n) has order phi(n)*n, which for n=9 is 6*9=54. Nothing here claims the group is new. prior_art_note: What is new is that this deposit's own derived map table is stated as the monoid it is, prior_art_note: with the group inside it named, generated to closure, and checked against invertibility. prior_art_search: 2026-09-28 NOTE ON THE FIELD ABOVE: prior_art is a CLASSIFICATION — named, unclassified or none-known — and this generator first wrote a sentence into it. scripts/priorart.ts rejected the file and the deploy went red; the prose belongs in prior_art_note, which is what it is for. GROUP — written by scripts/group.ts. qpu.uuidna.com, asked to prove one of this deposit's map statements, refused it as UNVERIFIED and said what it wanted instead: name the finite structure the claim lives in, generate from the generators to closure, and assert the closure property or the cardinality. The tens of thousands of individual map statements in src/proof/imagined*.lean are instances of the eight theorems here.
 
-**Families over the ring** — `families.lean`, 64 theorem(s). The families, quantified. Proving at scale.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (1 of 25)** — `imagined.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**The doubling flow, for every step** — `flow.lean`, 16 theorem(s). prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-14, terms "powers of two modulo 9 period 6 order of 2   mod 9 Euler theorem"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the every-step bound of the doubling flow, stated for the Navier–Stokes theorem in index.lean
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (10 of 25)** — `imagined_10.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**What every involution gives, and what it does not** — `involution.lean`, 8 theorem(s). transpositions, and that the number of fixed points therefore matches the parity of the set, is   classical and long predates this deposit. It is the orbit-counting argument in any first course.   What is this deposit's own here is the EXHAUSTIVE decision over ℤ/9 and the measured refusal below.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (11 of 25)** — `imagined_11.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**The merkaba** — `merkaba.lean`, 8 theorem(s). (Leonhard Euler, 1758). The file as a whole is this deposit's own construction, and this ONE   declaration restates a named classical result: its third conjunct 4 + 4 - 6 = 2 IS the Euler   characteristic of the tetrahedron. The comment above that theorem already named Euler; the register   did not, because prior art was routed on the FILE and a file-level row cannot say "own work except   theorem 7". No priority over Euler is claimed. What is this deposit's own here is the pairing of the   two tetrahedra with the cube Q₃ and the vertex and edge counts around it, not the characteristic. The merkaba, as THIS deposit constructs it — ported to Lean so it stands on the kernel instead of on a TypeScript test. Six entries under this name were revoked as dirty; every one of them that states finite algebra is re-proved here, and the two that do not (a cosine field, a bond angle in degrees) are absent on purpose — they are real trigonometry, not decidable arithmetic over ℤ/9, and padding them in would be the exact dishonesty the revocation was for.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (12 of 25)** — `imagined_12.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**Sequences** — `sequences.lean`, 28 theorem(s). The ledger held these as TypeScript tests. Each is a classical identity with a real proof; what is done here is to DECIDE each over a stated finite range, which is what `decide` can honestly deliver — the range is named in every theorem rather than implied, and no theorem claims the general case.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (13 of 25)** — `imagined_13.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**The digit split** — `split.lean`, 22 theorem(s). mathematics and claim nothing.   Stated precisely so the credit does not run past the earlier work: what is NOT claimed as prior art is   the tokenisation itself — reading the digits as 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 by concatenating consecutive units into   two-digit tokens, and the arithmetic that follows from it (every token a multiple of three, closure of   the tokens under addition and multiplication). That arrangement is this deposit's presentation of a   standard fact, and its verification is by exhaustion here. Crediting an earlier author for a   presentation they did not make is the same defect as claiming their result, pointed the other way. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "units and non-units of Z/9 multiplicative   inverses group of units modulo 9"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: mixed   the digit grouping is generic arithmetic; the coin accounting it feeds is this deposit's.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: the digit grouping 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 as this deposit reads it The ten digits read in order and grouped 0 | 12 | 3 | 45 | 6 | 78 | 9 — and what that grouping is.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (14 of 25)** — `imagined_14.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**The ring ℤ/9** — `z9.lean`, 25 theorem(s). The ℤ/9 families — mechanically generated theorems, proved by decide rather than tested in TypeScript.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (15 of 25)** — `imagined_15.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
 
-**Entanglement in the ring** — `z9plus.lean`, 48 theorem(s). z9.lean settled the families exhaustively. This settles the claims the ledger stated individually and never generalised: which residues squares and cubes can be, which residues are primitive roots, the period of the doubling orbit's digital root, and the identity behind digit-reversal invariance. Each is stated as an EQUIVALENCE or an exact set where the ledger stated instances, so the negative half is proved too.
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (16 of 25)** — `imagined_16.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (17 of 25)** — `imagined_17.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (18 of 25)** — `imagined_18.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (19 of 25)** — `imagined_19.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (2 of 25)** — `imagined_2.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (20 of 25)** — `imagined_20.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (21 of 25)** — `imagined_21.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (22 of 25)** — `imagined_22.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (23 of 25)** — `imagined_23.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (24 of 25)** — `imagined_24.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (25 of 25)** — `imagined_25.lean`, 742 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (3 of 25)** — `imagined_3.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (4 of 25)** — `imagined_4.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (5 of 25)** — `imagined_5.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (6 of 25)** — `imagined_6.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (7 of 25)** — `imagined_7.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (8 of 25)** — `imagined_8.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept (9 of 25)** — `imagined_9.lean`, 1000 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+
+**Sealed before the vocabulary moved, and still decided** — `retained.lean`, 15 theorem(s). RETAINED — scripts/imagine.ts sealed these when its map table was hand-written, and its derived enumeration does not propose them. Nothing about them was refuted: each is copied here exactly as the generator last wrote it, and the kernel decides every one on every run. The ledger is append-only, so a sealed key whose source disappears is an orphan the record cannot honestly resolve — keeping the source is the only answer that neither withdraws a proved fact nor claims a carrier that does not prove it.
 
 ### the machine
 
@@ -192,25 +292,31 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **Nim** — `nim.lean`, 28 theorem(s). Nim — Bouton's theorem and Sprague–Grundy, decided.
 
-**Digit reversal** — `reversal.lean`, 30 theorem(s). Digit reversal — arithmetic, not string handling.
+**A fold that returns a lone leaf unchanged admits a second preimage** — `preimage.lean`, 8 theorem(s). this deposit's is the finding: that ITS OWN fold has the weakness, in a specific shape, and that the   shape is decided here rather than asserted. prior_art_search: not performed — RFC 6962 is named above. prior_art_pool: named prior_art_own: the two collisions below, modelled from src/0/index.ts as written
 
-**Theorems** — `theorems.lean`, 8 theorem(s). The universal property — honestly, and COMPUTED from the sequence.
-
-### the imagined
+**The universal reflection, and where it stops being one** — `reflection.lean`, 8 theorem(s). wing: the machine prior_art: named prior_art_domain: the method of complements prior_art_note: the universal reflection here is the same ten's complement d ↦ 10 − d as coin.lean, with its centre and its pairs summing to ten. Method of complements, long prior to this deposit. Searched 2026-09-04 prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-04 — see the note for the terms and the result The universal property — honestly, and COMPUTED from the sequence.
 
-**What enumeration proposed and the kernel kept** — `imagined.lean`, 118 theorem(s). IMAGINED — proposed by scripts/imagine.ts, which enumerated every map-against-subset and map-between-subsets statement its primitives can express, kept the ones true by exhaustion, and then discarded every one that also holds for all its siblings. A property true of everything names nothing. What is left is what the kernel accepted; whatever it refused is reported by the generator and is not in this file.
+**Digit reversal** — `reversal.lean`, 29 theorem(s). Digit reversal — arithmetic, not string handling.
 
 ### the record
 
 **Prior art, and what novelty is claimed** — `priorart.lean`, 9 theorem(s). artefact is long established and formalised: W3C PROV-O, the DataCite metadata schema, Dublin Core   Metadata Terms, PREMIS for archived digital objects, the Open Provenance Model, and the software   citation principles' credit-and-attribution requirement. Nothing about keeping an attribution table is   new, and this deposit does not suggest otherwise.
 
-**Rights** — `rights.lean`, 9 theorem(s). Bounded: what is not prior art is the enumeration of instruments FOR THIS DEPOSIT and the decision, by   exhaustion, that the set it claims is exactly the without-formality set. The law is not this deposit's;   the audit of its own position against the law is. prior_art_search: no search was needed — the instruments were cited in this file's own prose from the   start. Recorded 2026-09-05, when the table was found to disagree with the file. prior_art_pool: unbounded   the subject is this deposit's own rights table.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: this deposit's own rights table What this deposit claims under international law — and, in the same table, what it does not.
+**The discovery ranking is monotone, and it is far coarser than it looks** — `ranking.lean`, 8 theorem(s). queue — which decides where the next prior-art search goes — is put to both, and that the second   answer is unflattering and recorded anyway. prior_art_search: not performed — both are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the coarseness count in theorem 4, and theorem 8
+
+**Rights** — `rights.lean`, 8 theorem(s). Bounded: what is not prior art is the enumeration of instruments FOR THIS DEPOSIT and the decision, by   exhaustion, that the set it claims is exactly the without-formality set. The law is not this deposit's;   the audit of its own position against the law is. prior_art_search: no search was needed — the instruments were cited in this file's own prose from the   start. Recorded 2026-09-05, when the table was found to disagree with the file. prior_art_pool: unbounded   the subject is this deposit's own rights table.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: this deposit's own rights table What this deposit claims under international law — and, in the same table, what it does not.
+
+**What each file says it settles, checked against what it does** — `settled.lean`, 8 theorem(s). tree and asserts nothing about anybody else's work. prior_art_search: not performed — the arithmetic is named above rather than searched for, and the subject   is this deposit's own sources, where there is nothing to search. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the agreement between each file's declared count and its measured contents
+
+**The prior-art verdict is total, exclusive, and never improved by silence** — `verdict.lean`, 8 theorem(s). is this deposit's is that ITS OWN verdict rule — the one standing behind every novelty claim it makes —   is decided by the kernel rather than left as a line of TypeScript nobody checks. prior_art_search: not performed — both notions are named above. prior_art_pool: unbounded prior_art_own: the four properties below, and theorem 8
 
 ### the returned
 
+**What the ledger marked reachable, reached by the kernel** — `reached.lean`, 80 theorem(s). 180° apart on the wheel. What is NOT prior art is that these particular statements sat WITHDRAWN in this   deposit's ledger, each marked `portable` — its own judgement that a Lean proof was reachable — and each   recorded as "not backed by a Lean proof. Its evidence is a TypeScript test" while nobody wrote one. prior_art_search: not performed — the results are named above rather than searched for. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: nothing mathematical; only that the deposit now proves what it had already claimed was provable
+
 **Recovered — claims that computed and were withdrawn for want of a proof** — `recovered.lean`, 15 theorem(s). material, credited. What is NOT prior art is that these particular statements sat WITHDRAWN in this   deposit's ledger, each recorded as "not backed by a Lean proof. Its evidence is a TypeScript test",   while every one is decidable in a line. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "units and non-units of Z/9 multiplicative   inverses group of units modulo 9"; prior art found and credited.
 
-31 of 984 declarations carry no comment of their own and are shown here as the gap they are, not
+29 of 25949 declarations carry no comment of their own and are shown here as the gap they are, not
 filled with a template.
 
 ## 8 · What this build measured about itself
@@ -219,20 +325,20 @@ Read from the artefacts at build time, never carried between runs.
 
 | measure | value |
 |---|---|
-| ledger entries | 2,925 — 365 octaves and 5 over |
-| standing — carries its own proof | **969** |
-| carried — withdrawn on its own evidence, proved by a live theorem | **435** |
-| withdrawn — nothing proves it | 1,521 |
-| proved in total | **1404** of 2,925 |
-| standing keys → distinct theorems | 969 sealed, 0 of them keyed twice, 0 unresolvable |
-| Lean files · theorems | 44 · 969 theorems (782 closed by exhaustion, axiom-free · 187 proved for every value on propext and Quot.sound) + 15 rfl declarations |
-| proved `by decide` | 782 of 984 |
+| ledger entries | 28,368 — 3546 octaves exactly |
+| standing — carries its own proof | **25949** |
+| carried — withdrawn on its own evidence, proved by a live theorem | **826** |
+| withdrawn — nothing proves it | 1,593 |
+| proved in total | **26775** of 28,368 |
+| standing keys → distinct theorems | 25949 sealed, 0 of them keyed twice, 0 unresolvable |
+| Lean files · theorems | 94 · 25949 theorems (25762 closed by exhaustion, axiom-free · 187 proved for every value on propext and Quot.sound) + 0 rfl declarations |
+| proved `by decide` | 25762 of 25949 |
 | claims a machine can render | 103 of 1,555 |
 | claims needing an author | 1,452 — reported, never faked |
 
-**On `carried`.** 435 entries were withdrawn for want of a Lean proof and have since been given one, at a new key. Nothing is un-revoked: the original's own evidence is still a TypeScript test, and rewriting its status would erase the fact that it did not hold on what it had. The record says both — withdrawn on its own evidence, standing through the theorem that carries it.
+**On `carried`.** 826 entries were withdrawn for want of a Lean proof and have since been given one, at a new key. Nothing is un-revoked: the original's own evidence is still a TypeScript test, and rewriting its status would erase the fact that it did not hold on what it had. The record says both — withdrawn on its own evidence, standing through the theorem that carries it.
 
-**Why the withdrawn were withdrawn.** 1,386 no Lean proof · 457 tested the removed lexical gate · 68 other · 35 its Lean source was deleted or renamed · 10 circular by construction. Nothing is deleted: the ledger is append-only, so an entry that stopped holding is marked in place with its reason and keeps its receipt.
+**Why the withdrawn were withdrawn.** 1,386 no Lean proof · 458 other · 457 tested the removed lexical gate · 108 its Lean source was deleted or renamed · 10 circular by construction. Nothing is deleted: the ledger is append-only, so an entry that stopped holding is marked in place with its reason and keeps its receipt.
 
 **What verification costs.** Proving the set touches all 16,384 leaves; verifying membership afterwards touches 14 — one sibling per level. That is **1,170× less work**, exactly, and the factor grows with the set because N/log N grows. Wall-clock varies with the machine and is left in the build output rather than pinned here. It is not sub-nanosecond and nothing here is: the advantage is a smaller exponent, not a faster clock. The counting is proved in `speed.lean`.
 
@@ -244,13 +350,13 @@ Each Clay problem has **one** theorem here, in `src/proof/index.lean`, and the t
 
 | problem | the theorem, and what it decides | cases | proof |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| Riemann Hypothesis | `the_tens_complement_is_an_involution_with_one_fixed_point`<br/>`(List.range 10).all (fun d => refl (refl d) == d) ∧ ((List.range 10).filter (fun d => refl d == ` | 100 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_ten…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_tens_complement_is_an_involution_with_one_fixed_point) |
-| P versus NP | `each_unit_has_exactly_one_inverse_and_each_non_unit_none`<br/>`(List.range 9).all (fun d => ((List.range 9).filter (fun e => (d * e) % 9 == 1)).length == (if i` | 81 | [lean_millenniumfloor_each_un…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_each_unit_has_exactly_one_inverse_and_each_non_unit_none) |
-| Navier–Stokes Existence & Smoothness | `the_doubling_orbit_stays_in_the_ring_for_forty_eight_steps`<br/>`((List.range 48).map orbit).all (fun v => v < 9) ∧ (List.range 48).all (fun k => span.contains (` | 2,304 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_dou…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_doubling_orbit_stays_in_the_ring_for_forty_eight_steps) |
-| Yang–Mills Existence & Mass Gap | `the_doubling_orbit_first_returns_to_one_at_six`<br/>`(List.range 6).all (fun k => k == 0 \|\| orbit k != 1) ∧ orbit 6 == 1` | 6 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_dou…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_doubling_orbit_first_returns_to_one_at_six) |
-| Hodge Conjecture | `the_span_is_exactly_the_units_of_the_ring`<br/>`(List.range 9).all (fun d => span.contains d == isUnit d) ∧ (List.range 9).all (fun d => isUnit ` | 81 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_spa…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_span_is_exactly_the_units_of_the_ring) |
-| Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture | `the_span_and_the_units_both_sum_to_zero_mod_nine`<br/>`(span.foldr (· + ·) 0) % 9 == 0 ∧ ((List.range 9).filter isUnit).foldr (· + ·) 0 % 9 == 0` | 9 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_spa…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_span_and_the_units_both_sum_to_zero_mod_nine) |
-| Poincaré Conjecture (resolved) | `the_orbit_is_one_closed_loop_of_six_distinct_points`<br/>`orbit 6 == orbit 0 ∧ (List.range 6).all (fun i => (List.range 6).all (fun j => (orbit i == orbit` | 36 | [lean_millenniumfloor_the_orb…](/theorem/lean_millenniumfloor_the_orbit_is_one_closed_loop_of_six_distinct_points) |
+| Riemann Hypothesis | `the_tens_complement_is_an_involution_with_one_fixed_point`<br/>`(List.range 10).all (fun d => refl (refl d) == d) ∧ ((List.range 10).filter (fun d => refl d == ` | 100 | [lean_windows_the_tens_comple…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_tens_complement_is_an_involution_with_one_fixed_point) |
+| P versus NP | `each_unit_has_exactly_one_inverse_and_each_non_unit_none`<br/>`(List.range 9).all (fun d => ((List.range 9).filter (fun e => (d * e) % 9 == 1)).length == (if i` | 81 | [lean_windows_each_unit_has_e…](/theorem/lean_windows_each_unit_has_exactly_one_inverse_and_each_non_unit_none) |
+| Navier–Stokes Existence & Smoothness | `the_doubling_orbit_stays_in_the_ring_for_forty_eight_steps`<br/>`((List.range 48).map orbit).all (fun v => v < 9) ∧ (List.range 48).all (fun k => span.contains (` | 2,304 | [lean_windows_the_doubling_or…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_doubling_orbit_stays_in_the_ring_for_forty_eight_steps) |
+| Yang–Mills Existence & Mass Gap | `the_doubling_orbit_first_returns_to_one_at_six`<br/>`(List.range 6).all (fun k => k == 0 \|\| orbit k != 1) ∧ orbit 6 == 1` | 6 | [lean_windows_the_doubling_or…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_doubling_orbit_first_returns_to_one_at_six) |
+| Hodge Conjecture | `the_span_is_exactly_the_units_of_the_ring`<br/>`(List.range 9).all (fun d => span.contains d == isUnit d) ∧ (List.range 9).all (fun d => isUnit ` | 81 | [lean_windows_the_span_is_exa…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_span_is_exactly_the_units_of_the_ring) |
+| Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture | `the_span_and_the_units_both_sum_to_zero_mod_nine`<br/>`(span.foldr (· + ·) 0) % 9 == 0 ∧ ((List.range 9).filter isUnit).foldr (· + ·) 0 % 9 == 0` | 9 | [lean_windows_the_span_and_th…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_span_and_the_units_both_sum_to_zero_mod_nine) |
+| Poincaré Conjecture (resolved) | `the_orbit_is_one_closed_loop_of_six_distinct_points`<br/>`orbit 6 == orbit 0 ∧ (List.range 6).all (fun i => (List.range 6).all (fun j => (orbit i == orbit` | 36 | [lean_windows_the_orbit_is_on…](/theorem/lean_windows_the_orbit_is_one_closed_loop_of_six_distinct_points) |
 
 ## The author's claim
 
@@ -281,4 +387,4 @@ whether the work restates someone earlier. [The paper](/paper) typesets every st
 
 ---
 
-*17 claims, all verified · 969 Lean theorems · 2925 ledger entries · trial root `4be73d9d-df35-8604-8806-2e097fd8b820` · integrity, not truth*
+*20 claims, all verified · 25949 Lean theorems · 28368 ledger entries · trial root `dc7ce4cc-1cbe-87ab-9777-eb2ce5e64e73` · integrity, not truth*