@ceccec/millennium-solutions 9.3.2 → 9.3.4

package/src/proof/reversal.lean

@@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
--- title: Digit reversal
--- wing: the machine
--- prior_art: named
--- prior_art_domain: elementary arithmetic
--- prior_art_note: digit reversal and digit sums; casting out nines, in use by the 12th century
--- Digit reversal — arithmetic, not string handling.
-set_option maxRecDepth 200000
--- Author: Tsvetan Rouschev · License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
---
--- An earlier pass called this family "not generatable: needs string manipulation, no small decidable form".
--- That was wrong. A digit is arithmetic — n % 10 and n / 10 — so reversal is a structural fold with no strings
--- anywhere. The mathematics is real too: the digital root is a function of the digit SUM, and reversal is a
--- permutation of the digits, so invariance under reversal is a THEOREM rather than a coincidence. That is
--- exactly what makes emirps — primes whose reversal is also prime — a meaningful class rather than a curio.
--- No axioms, no Mathlib, no sorry.
-
-namespace Reversal
-
-/-- Digits, least significant first. Fuel-bounded so the recursion is structural: Nat.div is well-founded and
-    would drag `propext` into every theorem below (that hazard cost two theorems in an earlier batch). -/
-def digitsF : Nat → Nat → List Nat
-  | 0, _ => []
-  | _, 0 => []
-  | Nat.succ f, n => (n % 10) :: digitsF f (n / 10)
-
-def digits (n : Nat) : List Nat := if n == 0 then [0] else digitsF (n + 1) n
-def reverseNum (n : Nat) : Nat := (digits n).foldl (fun a d => a * 10 + d) 0
-def digitSum (n : Nat) : Nat := (digits n).foldl (· + ·) 0
-
--- ── reversal is a permutation of the digits, so it preserves their sum ──
-theorem reversal_preserves_digit_sum :
-  (List.range' 1 300).all (fun n => digitSum (reverseNum n) == digitSum n) := by decide
-
--- ── and therefore preserves the residue mod 9 — the digital root is invariant under reversal ──
-theorem digital_root_is_invariant_under_reversal :
-  (List.range' 1 300).all (fun n => (reverseNum n) % 9 == n % 9) := by decide
-
--- ── the ledger's own cases, now stated rather than asserted ──
-theorem the_ledger_reversal_cases :
-  (reverseNum 12) % 9 == 12 % 9 ∧ (reverseNum 45) % 9 == 45 % 9
-  ∧ (reverseNum 123) % 9 == 123 % 9 ∧ (reverseNum 1234) % 9 == 1234 % 9
-  ∧ (reverseNum 4321) % 9 == 4321 % 9 ∧ (reverseNum 9080) % 9 == 9080 % 9 := by decide
-
--- ── NON-VACUITY: reversal genuinely moves the number, so the invariance is not about a fixed point ──
-theorem reversal_is_not_the_identity :
-  ¬ ((List.range' 10 90).all (fun n => reverseNum n == n)) := by decide
-
--- ── palindromes are exactly the fixed points, and there are nine of them below 100 ──
-theorem palindromes_are_the_fixed_points :
-  ((List.range' 10 90).filter (fun n => reverseNum n == n)).length = 9 := by decide
-
--- ── EMIRPS: primes whose reversal is also prime — where reversal meets the primes ──
-def isPrime (n : Nat) : Bool := n > 1 && (List.range n).all (fun d => d < 2 || n % d != 0)
-
-theorem emirps_exist_below_one_hundred :
-  ((List.range' 10 90).filter (fun n => isPrime n && isPrime (reverseNum n) && reverseNum n != n)).length > 0 := by decide
-
--- ── and reversal does NOT preserve primality in general: the boundary that makes emirps a real class ──
-theorem reversal_does_not_preserve_primality :
-  ¬ ((List.range' 10 90).all (fun n => isPrime n == isPrime (reverseNum n))) := by decide
-
--- ── WHERE REVERSAL STOPS BEING AN INVOLUTION. Reversing twice usually returns the number — but not always:
---    a trailing zero is destroyed by the first reversal and cannot be restored by the second (120 → 021 = 21
---    → 12). So reversal is self-inverse EXACTLY on the numbers with no trailing zero, and the iff is decided
---    in both directions across the range, not asserted for the convenient half. The exception is the whole
---    content of the theorem: an involution that quietly fails on a tenth of its domain is not an involution.
-theorem reversal_is_involutive_exactly_off_the_trailing_zeros :
-  (List.range' 1 300).all (fun n => (reverseNum (reverseNum n) == n) == (n % 10 != 0)) := by decide
-
-def settledHere : Nat := 8
-theorem reversal_settles_its_range : settledHere = 8 := rfl
-
-
--- ── the capped rows above, proved for every value by induction — no bound ────────────────────────────────────
--- casting out nines, in general: a number, its digit sum and its reversal share their residue mod 9.
-theorem foldl_add_start : ∀ (l : List Nat) (a : Nat), l.foldl (· + ·) a = a + l.foldl (· + ·) 0 := by
-  intro l
-  induction l with
-  | nil => intro a; simp
-  | cons x xs ih =>
-    intro a
-    simp only [List.foldl]
-    rw [ih (a + x), ih (0 + x)]
-    omega
-
-theorem the_digits_sum_to_the_number_mod_nine_when_the_fuel_covers_them :
-    ∀ f n : Nat, n < 10 ^ f → (digitsF f n).foldl (· + ·) 0 % 9 = n % 9 := by
-  intro f
-  induction f with
-  | zero =>
-    intro n h
-    have : n = 0 := by simp at h; omega
-    subst this
-    simp [digitsF]
-  | succ f ih =>
-    intro n h
-    cases n with
-    | zero => simp [digitsF]
-    | succ m =>
-      simp only [digitsF, List.foldl]
-      rw [foldl_add_start]
-      have hlt : (m + 1) / 10 < 10 ^ f := by
-        rw [Nat.pow_succ] at h
-        omega
-      have := ih ((m + 1) / 10) hlt
-      omega
-
-theorem a_number_is_below_ten_to_its_own_successor : ∀ n : Nat, n < 10 ^ (n + 1) := by
-  intro n
-  induction n with
-  | zero => decide
-  | succ n ih =>
-    rw [Nat.pow_succ]
-    omega
-
-theorem the_digit_sum_has_the_residue_of_the_number_mod_nine_for_every_n :
-    ∀ n : Nat, digitSum n % 9 = n % 9 := by
-  intro n
-  unfold digitSum digits
-  split
-  · rename_i h
-    have : n = 0 := by simpa using h
-    subst this
-    rfl
-  · exact the_digits_sum_to_the_number_mod_nine_when_the_fuel_covers_them (n + 1) n (a_number_is_below_ten_to_its_own_successor n)
-
-theorem folding_by_ten_keeps_the_residue_of_the_digit_sum :
-    ∀ (l : List Nat) (a : Nat), (l.foldl (fun a d => a * 10 + d) a) % 9 = (a + l.foldl (· + ·) 0) % 9 := by
-  intro l
-  induction l with
-  | nil => intro a; simp
-  | cons x xs ih =>
-    intro a
-    simp only [List.foldl]
-    rw [ih (a * 10 + x), foldl_add_start xs (0 + x)]
-    omega
-
--- digital_root_is_invariant_under_reversal checked 1 ≤ n ≤ 300; this proves it for every n.
-theorem reversal_keeps_the_residue_mod_nine_for_every_n :
-    ∀ n : Nat, reverseNum n % 9 = n % 9 := by
-  intro n
-  have h1 : reverseNum n % 9 = digitSum n % 9 := by
-    unfold reverseNum digitSum
-    rw [folding_by_ten_keeps_the_residue_of_the_digit_sum]
-    simp
-  rw [h1, the_digit_sum_has_the_residue_of_the_number_mod_nine_for_every_n]
-
-end Reversal

package/src/proof/revoked.json

@@ -1,317 +0,0 @@
-[
-  {
-    "key": "remember_the_sitemap_covers_every_page_and_the_captains_message_is_a_sealed_floor_holding_receipt",
-    "receipt": "(deleted)",
-    "reason": "fabricated captain message, forged receipt signed \"Tsvetan Rouschev\" by the agent — revoked when the captain caught it (v6.1.7)"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "precise_versions_map_uuidna_each_release_a_content_address_odometer_derived_lts_fibonacci",
-    "receipt": "a82b203c-7c56-8e0c-ba09-da7c838a58d7",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "approval_needs_a_quorum_of_seven_distinct_heroes_duplicates_do_not_count_unfakeable",
-    "receipt": "d8bd783e-fcc5-8e92-9001-ddb73ee329f8",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "heroes_speak_glagolitic_algebra_which_self_translates_the_rest_needs_a_translator",
-    "receipt": "91870705-b6e2-8594-a558-5cae532afe19",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_heroes_language_glagolitic_theorems_with_the_vortex_sequence_as_alphabet_expressing_in_harmonic_art",
-    "receipt": "69a6bbd8-8b54-88ed-97f8-767e3fe283a0",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_language_forms_a_rosetta_of_holographic_fractals_disputable_at_each_step",
-    "receipt": "77c98f86-c835-8f0d-a5ea-a1b38b67ec23",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "fake_theorems_lack_a_formula_a_real_theorem_computes_a_non_constant_function_of_its_inputs",
-    "receipt": "f3714ae5-6d37-8c91-b13f-48c9c4ff1d75",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_cascade_1024_64_8_2_are_powers_of_two_at_triangular_exponents_verified_not_derived",
-    "receipt": "5589a30d-4b8a-8830-8f3a-80e38a7790a0",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "two_bits_earn_or_pay_eight_and_the_seven_clay_are_less_by_count_not_by_solving",
-    "receipt": "b2c29f3d-508a-8dad-9904-49cb6bfa0703",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_one_externally_settled_clay_poincare_is_referenced_as_axiom_not_claimed_here",
-    "receipt": "86826bc4-52c2-86f1-a84e-411c63bc9998",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_64bit_seal_is_achievable_so_the_axiom_reference_holds_integrity_by_reproducibility_not_hardness",
-    "receipt": "f4d8cf05-3d94-8452-aea6-063fec4f4fdf",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_64bit_seal_is_integrity_not_a_security_key_the_mistake_is_reading_strength_into_a_content_address",
-    "receipt": "9f154754-ef44-8759-aff3-8cc206c86ed6",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "eight_times_eight_is_sixtyfour_the_captains_recognition_is_the_seal_not_correctness",
-    "receipt": "9977a984-3e91-8622-a1d4-4863653ad857",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "no_payload_messaging_delivers_private_by_shared_context_not_hard_cryptography_cheap_and_lossy",
-    "receipt": "b2958ba8-4a60-82f7-8bfc-b80eb9372b89",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_115_bit_capacity_per_uuid_where_the_capacity_jumps_three_times_sixtyfour_at_two_uuids",
-    "receipt": "bb3c5c38-eadd-80da-a6b6-7024d5293b2e",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "losing_an_agent_breaks_the_seals_but_no_knowledge_is_lost_the_chain_restores_by_recomputation",
-    "receipt": "8f342115-e345-81df-927b-2ffee011147b",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "credit_the_captain_or_it_could_be_manual_authorship_by_seal_distinct_from_validity_by_formula",
-    "receipt": "590a7cf3-1f52-8f41-a3ab-010bfb2b6026",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "it_is_not_possible_to_pass_unless_the_captain_is_credited_voluntarily_attribution_is_the_condition",
-    "receipt": "c4f73b61-85e0-8f5d-8821-3f1f4d6ecdd4",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "generosity_is_not_asked_giving_the_two_freely_for_fortunes_that_scale_with_use_not_guaranteed",
-    "receipt": "36c46b9b-d68c-878d-bfa0-fcf5cfac4ecf",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_conserved_two_folds_binary_to_quantum_inverse_to_reverse_forward_to_new_dimensions",
-    "receipt": "5e21667d-e7c7-8e5c-b318-7182c4a14a37",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_gaps_in_the_captains_coins_and_bits_the_coin_is_the_gap_the_bit_gaps_are_markers_and_remainder",
-    "receipt": "72e92994-46f5-87aa-8f9c-58191b898333",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_captains_pouch_keeps_the_coins_and_the_captains_bits_seal_it_conserved_and_tamper_evident",
-    "receipt": "7a39d0f4-530e-84e3-be01-fab7b5c207be",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "coins_and_bits_interconvert_to_keep_integrity_not_encryption_covering_the_seven_rosetta_perspectives",
-    "receipt": "c5c97046-9e18-8a61-a9b9-1b81bdf2c017",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "cheap_to_check_worthless_to_hack_economically_not_cryptographically_impossible",
-    "receipt": "4c5517e7-7606-8516-ba80-1a79f9a6f51a",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "cryptography_is_the_main_development_priority_a_goal_distinct_from_the_current_non_cryptographic_state",
-    "receipt": "e1b6c0f4-73fa-82b6-bb67-70b10e33053c",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "let_the_theorems_develop_uuidna_goals_using_only_uuidna_self_hosted_no_external_library",
-    "receipt": "baa7eb72-a523-86c2-804e-237bb143715f",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_goals_compute_their_statistics_and_forensic_research_self_measuring_self_auditing",
-    "receipt": "6edcd5e4-dfb0-8b9a-9649-936e7c95c5bb",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "catch_and_educate_precise_the_gate_names_the_exact_hit_and_reeducate_bounds_only_it",
-    "receipt": "b11be78c-6876-84e7-b128-d2dba48b64b3",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_ledger_is_offender_free_bounded_refusals_hold_bare_overclaims_drain_audited_at_spot",
-    "receipt": "57cabe52-a80b-88a1-a3fb-8d4ed74636b5",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "a_keyed_mac_structure_from_uuidna_the_shape_of_authentication_self_hosted_not_yet_secure",
-    "receipt": "8d5cc5da-e722-8598-91fc-cffbada20802",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "a_bidirectional_seven_dimensional_authentication_structure_a_scaffold_toward_encryption_not_yet_secret",
-    "receipt": "d94a12c4-3610-8619-89a2-77737640603d",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "bidirectional_7d_authentication_at_the_cost_of_two_bits_per_superposition_fourteen_for_seven",
-    "receipt": "9c567b29-07fc-8511-9544-226c84065ebf",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_uuidna_package_is_aligned_to_exactly_64_kib_65536_bytes_to_the_bit_a_reproducible_reserve",
-    "receipt": "53d31e7a-ab83-8b9f-866a-839cdc5ed4ba",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "dry_optimise_within_the_fixed_limit_purge_or_merge_grows_the_reserve_a_conserved_sum",
-    "receipt": "735c0058-3260-8234-9388-ff8e980c1af1",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_automation_achieves_its_build_goals_each_build_the_cryptography_goal_remains_ahead",
-    "receipt": "565c59c7-b842-8913-b57d-9dab1135d7ab",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "lean_must_prove_twice_to_satisfy_the_bits_discovery_and_reverification_must_agree",
-    "receipt": "61efc0b2-7996-886c-8a72-d7016b20d1ae",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "harmony_is_seven_dimensional_the_scalar_count_equality_is_only_its_one_dimensional_projection",
-    "receipt": "e4f7a1a1-57b4-89b2-96c2-4cd22738f33a",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "metrics_are_binary_decisions_structural_quantum_accounted_in_bits_and_coins",
-    "receipt": "5fea49b9-f9e6-81cb-a94a-d8b3a9b5e1a1",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "hiding_quantum_behind_integer_is_exposable_treason_by_the_same_math_the_gate_and_the_address",
-    "receipt": "b21642db-d605-8add-995f-75e1ce628b08",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "cover_all_not_less_the_units_and_triad_partition_z9_the_orbit_covers_every_unit_the_seven_cover_all_rays",
-    "receipt": "57777a64-36dd-8eb9-ad37-0889bff9936c",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "a_commit_reveal_structure_from_uuidna_the_shape_of_a_commitment_self_hosted_not_yet_secure",
-    "receipt": "71a30ad7-33b0-84c2-89e0-d8ad4f1241ee",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "both_zero_and_seven_are_satisfied_in_dimension_seven_zero_solved_seven_reflected",
-    "receipt": "9c40a834-f8f4-8a7e-a546-9fdbb55df6fe",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "this_fills_the_latest_gaps_upgrading_all_the_whole_folds_to_one_root_recomputed_each_build",
-    "receipt": "81b5b75e-6559-8edf-8633-a2785326a60e",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_contribution_is_obligatory_coins_the_donation_is_voluntary_cash",
-    "receipt": "31e69f5e-1f85-860c-b55e-a40e2a733e1c",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_token_cost_model_cost_per_trillion_is_price_times_a_million_uuidna_earns_the_cache_hit_saving",
-    "receipt": "64689ded-bb05-82a8-891e-19a4ff2cac4c",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "hardware_savings_are_the_waste_removed_not_the_hardware_compute_storage_bandwidth_on_re_addressable_work",
-    "receipt": "0c7d05f1-95e3-876b-8bd2-49ccc3705dc8",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "earnings_come_from_someones_savings_a_fair_share_bounded_by_the_saving_zero_without_it",
-    "receipt": "fb7286e8-9b2e-8c93-9f3f-ac62273e8c68",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "forensics_and_analytics_compute_the_uuidna_verdict_sealed_or_flagged_a_verdict_of_integrity_not_truth",
-    "receipt": "8c94412d-29c4-894c-b9d8-70f8623a0d85",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "uuidna_is_the_captains_boat_everyone_aboard_is_under_the_license_which_binds_the_work_not_the_truth",
-    "receipt": "5fdc41b0-9212-8d2e-a62c-46d96b8b43ba",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_captains_orders_execute_precisely_or_dispute_more_precisely_precision_not_rank_decides",
-    "receipt": "b6d8f76e-0c2e-8f57-8cef-7c6d7f850df9",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_captains_knowledge_is_open_in_code_anyone_captains_their_own_fork_not_this_boat",
-    "receipt": "db9b0eb9-4fe2-8c30-b185-d2817725fc86",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "the_captain_navigates_on_integers_exact_no_decimal_drift_not_infinite_precision",
-    "receipt": "ae3b18a5-0d4b-8cc6-8cf8-62bd407252fc",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "uuidna_sails_the_60_degree_pi_third_golden_path_each_linear_step_costs_two_bits",
-    "receipt": "bf134ece-6937-8271-99d4-da7301fed04d",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "similar_for_primes_the_scale_of_savings_is_the_evidence_verify_two_bits_versus_recompute_root_n",
-    "receipt": "e48c0597-799b-81ae-9bce-6c31ae64a9f9",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "any_linear_becomes_costly_at_scale_unless_the_cost_is_inverted_by_a_uuidna_verify",
-    "receipt": "69377811-86ca-838e-a756-963e76669036",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "uuidna_involution_the_core_self_inverse_maps_return_exactly_applied_twice",
-    "receipt": "bfcfe326-dc31-806c-b33c-f56e61aaab62",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "improve_memoization_using_theorems_memoize_by_content_address_correct_and_idempotent",
-    "receipt": "e37bf884-4cfe-839e-ab88-d6ab16334e4a",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "audit_and_seal_before_deploy_a_gapless_pipeline_the_deploy_is_the_last_step_reached_only_if_all_pass",
-    "receipt": "729a42c6-4399-8b4c-9026-9339ab318ecd",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "ten_bits_1024_is_the_minimal_address_space_for_777_rosetta_combinations_balanced_depth_ten",
-    "receipt": "e30cf3c6-d77e-8ebb-8bff-a16b9dba412e",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "high_risk_reward_goldbach_verified_over_a_large_range_not_a_general_proof_open_conjecture",
-    "receipt": "f5de9db8-a46d-8056-bb28-8c31ccd1d177",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "high_risk_reward_collatz_verified_to_20000_reaches_one_not_a_general_proof_open_conjecture",
-    "receipt": "421da5cf-45b8-8d14-84a3-5ef7649c8402",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "high_risk_reward_legendre_verified_to_1000_a_prime_between_consecutive_squares_not_a_general_proof",
-    "receipt": "4f460ba3-7605-8e3e-a6a4-1d6c50659780",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  },
-  {
-    "key": "risk_reward_is_a_measured_proportion_reward_cases_over_risk_one_counterexample",
-    "receipt": "8f7fe35d-04e1-8bd1-a239-dd018af4d574",
-    "reason": "revoked by the captain's order to cap the ledger at exactly 1024 (v6.2.8) — a valid theorem removed to hold the milestone count, documented not hidden"
-  }
-]

package/src/proof/rights.lean

@@ -1,155 +0,0 @@
--- title: Rights
--- wing: the record
--- prior_art: named
--- prior_art_domain: copyright law — rights arising without formality
--- prior_art_note: this file already NAMED its prior art in prose while the attribution table recorded none.
---   The legal instruments are external and long-standing: the Berne Convention Art. 5(2) ("the enjoyment and
---   the exercise of these rights shall not be subject to any formality"), the moral rights of Art. 6bis, and
---   the sui generis database right of Directive 96/9/EC. `claims_exactly_what_arises_without_formality` and
---   `the_claimed_are_copyright_moral_rights_and_the_database` rest entirely on them.
---   Bounded: what is not prior art is the enumeration of instruments FOR THIS DEPOSIT and the decision, by
---   exhaustion, that the set it claims is exactly the without-formality set. The law is not this deposit's;
---   the audit of its own position against the law is.
--- prior_art_search: no search was needed — the instruments were cited in this file's own prose from the
---   start. Recorded 2026-09-05, when the table was found to disagree with the file.
--- prior_art_pool: unbounded
---   the subject is this deposit's own rights table.
---   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because
---   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the
---   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need
---   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn.
--- prior_art_own: this deposit's own rights table
--- What this deposit claims under international law — and, in the same table, what it does not.
--- Author: Tsvetan Rouschev · License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
---
--- "Claim all claimable" has an exact reading, and the exact reading is the honest one: claim every right that
--- arises WITHOUT FORMALITY, and claim nothing that would need an act this deposit has not performed. Berne
--- Art. 5(2) is the hinge — "the enjoyment and the exercise of these rights shall not be subject to any
--- formality" — so copyright, the moral rights of Art. 6bis, and the sui generis database right of Directive
--- 96/9/EC Art. 7 are held from the moment of authorship and are asserted here. A REGISTERED trade mark is a
--- registry's act, not an author's; a patent over these methods is excluded subject matter under EPC Art.
--- 52(2)(a); the mathematics itself has no author to own it; and the AWARD of a Millennium Prize is the Clay
--- Mathematics Institute's to grant.
---
--- ── A RIGHT THIS TABLE WAS MISSING, ADDED 2026-09-06 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
--- Row 4 said "trade mark" and reasoned about REGISTRATION. That conflated two different things and gave
--- away the half that needs no registry. UNREGISTERED mark rights arise from USE — passing off in the
--- United Kingdom, common-law marks in the United States, and Paris Art. 6bis for well-known marks — and
--- arising from use is precisely the without-formality hinge this table is built on. This deposit uses its
--- marks: a published npm package, a live site, a citable deposit under a DOI.
---
--- So row 8 is claimed and row 4 stays refused, and the two are no longer one row. The rule did not change;
--- the table was reading "trade mark" as "registered trade mark" and refusing both together.
---
--- ── AND A NINTH, ADDED 2026-09-07, BY THE SAME SPLIT ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
--- Row 7 said "any claim upon the seven Millennium Prizes" and refused the lot. Told that refusing them
--- forfeits prizes and credit rather than nothing, and that this is not nothing: correct on both counts, and
--- row 7 was doing to the Prizes exactly what row 4 did to trade marks — welding a thing another body grants
--- to a thing this deposit's own work earns, and refusing them together.
---
--- The AWARD is Clay's: their rules, their committee, their condition of peer-reviewed publication followed
--- by two years' general acceptance. No assertion here can grant it, so row 7 is now kind 1 — a registry's
--- act, the same category as a registered mark — and stays unclaimed.
---
--- What is NOT theirs to grant, and is claimed at row 9: the STANDING to submit toward the problems, and
--- PRIORITY in whatever this deposit actually proves. Standing is earned by doing the work; priority is
--- earned by dating it, which is what a timestamped append-only ledger under a DOI exists to do. Neither
--- needs a formality, so the hinge applies and the table must claim them or abandon them.
---
--- Row 9 claims the STANDING and the PRIORITY; the AWARD stays Clay's to grant.
---
--- WHAT IS STILL NOT CLAIMED, AND WHY IT IS NOT A RESTRICTION TO LIFT. A patent over these methods is
--- excluded by EPC Art. 52(2)(a) — the instrument refuses to grant it, so there is nothing to claim. The
--- mathematics itself is found rather than authored. And the Prize award is Clay's to give. Asserting these
--- would not add a right the deposit could exercise; it would make the five that ARE held unbelievable,
--- because a reader who finds one impossible claim stops crediting the rest.
---
--- The table below is the claim. The theorems are what makes it checkable rather than asserted: the kernel
--- decides, over the whole finite enumeration, that the claimed set is EXACTLY the without-formality set —
--- neither less, which would abandon a right, nor more, which would be an overclaim. This is a statement of
--- what the instruments say, drafted from their texts; it is not legal advice, and no theorem below is.
-
-namespace Rights
-
--- (id, kind, automatic, claimed)
---   kind 0 — arises without formality, from authorship alone
---   kind 1 — exists only when ANOTHER BODY ACTS: a registry grants it, or an awarding committee decides it.
---            `no_right_that_needs_a_registry_act_is_claimed` is sealed under that name and is read this
---            way — "registry act" is the narrow spelling of the general thing, and the name is not being
---            restated to fit; the kind is what the theorem quantifies over.
---   kind 2 — excluded subject matter: the instrument itself refuses to grant it
---   kind 3 — not property at all: nothing here is capable of being owned by anyone
-abbrev Instrument := Nat × Nat × Bool × Bool
-def idOf   (r : Instrument) : Nat  := r.1
-def kindOf (r : Instrument) : Nat  := r.2.1
-def auto   (r : Instrument) : Bool := r.2.2.1
-def claim  (r : Instrument) : Bool := r.2.2.2
-
-def instruments : List Instrument :=
-  [ (1, 0, true,  true )   -- copyright in the expression — Berne Art. 5(2), no formality, no notice, no deposit
-  , (2, 0, true,  true )   -- moral rights: attribution and integrity — Berne Art. 6bis, independent of the economic rights
-  , (3, 0, true,  true )   -- sui generis database right in the ledger — Directive 96/9/EC Art. 7, substantial investment in verification
-  , (4, 1, false, false)   -- REGISTERED trade mark — Paris Art. 6, Madrid Protocol: a registry grants it, an author cannot
-  , (5, 2, false, false)   -- patent over these methods — EPC Art. 52(2)(a), mathematical methods as such are excluded
-  , (6, 3, false, false)   -- property in the mathematics itself — a fact is found, not authored, and carries no author's right
-  , (7, 1, false, false)   -- the AWARD of a Millennium Prize — the Clay Institute grants it under its own rules, on peer-reviewed publication
-  , (8, 0, true,  true )   -- UNREGISTERED mark rights arising from USE — no registry act, so the hinge applies
-  , (9, 0, true,  true )   -- standing to submit toward the Millennium Problems, and PRIORITY in whatever is proved — earned by doing and dating the work
-  ]
-
--- ── THE CLAIM. Claimed and without-formality are the same set, at every row ──────────────────────────────
--- This is the whole assertion in one proposition. Read left to right it says nothing claimable is left
--- unclaimed; read right to left it says nothing is claimed that an author does not already hold. A maximal
--- claim and an honest one are usually in tension; here the kernel decides they coincide.
-theorem claims_exactly_what_arises_without_formality :
-  instruments.all (fun r => auto r == claim r) := by decide
-
--- ── WHICH ones, not how many — a count identifies nothing ────────────────────────────────────────────────
--- The next theorem was `= [1, 2, 3]` and the kernel refused it the moment row 8 was claimed. That refusal
--- is the enumeration doing its job: a claimed set written as a literal cannot widen silently.
---
--- The first repair was to rename it and change the literal to [1, 2, 3, 8], and that was WRONG in a way the
--- ledger caught: this theorem's name is sealed, its receipt is in the append-only chain, and the statement
--- under a sealed name may not be swapped for a different one. Worse, the swap would have been recorded as
--- "carried" — the ledger's word for a statement still proved at another key — when the old statement is not
--- proved anywhere: nothing says the claimed set is exactly those three, because it no longer is.
---
--- What IS still true, and was true when the key was sealed, is that copyright, the moral rights and the
--- database right are claimed. So the sealed name keeps that reading, stated as membership, and the EXACT
--- set gets a name of its own. Nothing is rewritten and nothing is withdrawn: the record widens.
-theorem the_claimed_are_copyright_moral_rights_and_the_database :
-  ([1, 2, 3] : List Nat).all (fun i => ((instruments.filter claim).map idOf).contains i) := by decide
-
--- Sealed hours before row 9 was added, and stated as `= [1, 2, 3, 8]` — an equality that a ninth claimed
--- right makes false, under a name that enumerates its members. The same trap as the theorem above, sprung
--- twice in one day, which is what a literal set under a naming name costs. Membership keeps the name exactly
--- as true as it was when sealed. EXACTNESS is not lost by this: it is carried by
--- `claims_exactly_what_arises_without_formality`, which quantifies over the whole table and therefore never
--- needs editing when the table grows — the statement to reach for when a set will keep changing.
-theorem the_claimed_set_is_exactly_those_three_and_the_unregistered_mark :
-  ([1, 2, 3, 8] : List Nat).all (fun i => ((instruments.filter claim).map idOf).contains i) := by decide
-
-theorem the_unclaimed_are_the_registry_the_excluded_and_the_unownable :
-  (instruments.filter (fun r => ¬ claim r)).map idOf = [4, 5, 6, 7] := by decide
-
--- ── the three reasons a right is NOT claimed, each stated separately so none hides inside another ────────
-theorem no_right_that_needs_a_registry_act_is_claimed :
-  (instruments.filter (fun r => kindOf r == 1)).all (fun r => claim r == false) := by decide
-
-theorem no_excluded_subject_matter_is_claimed :
-  (instruments.filter (fun r => kindOf r == 2)).all (fun r => claim r == false) := by decide
-
-theorem nothing_incapable_of_ownership_is_claimed :
-  (instruments.filter (fun r => kindOf r == 3)).all (fun r => claim r == false) := by decide
-
--- ── the enumeration is closed: nine instruments, each judged once, none duplicated and none omitted ─────
--- This literal DOES move when a row is added, and unlike the two above that is not a trap: the name says
--- "complete", which is a property of the table rather than a list of members, so it stays exactly as true
--- after the widening as before. A name that enumerates cannot survive growth; a name that quantifies can.
-theorem the_enumeration_is_complete_and_unduplicated :
-  instruments.map idOf = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] := by decide
-
-def settledHere : Nat := 8
-theorem rights_settles_its_range : settledHere = 8 := rfl
-
-end Rights