@ceccec/millennium-solutions 9.2.6 → 9.2.8

package/ACCOUNTING.md

@@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ Every figure recomputes from `src/` and the git tree on each build; nothing is e
 
 | Quantity | Value |
 |---|---|
-| Decidable theorems (chained receipts) | **2,607** |
+| Decidable theorems (chained receipts) | **2,643** |
 | Signed statement receipts | **29** |
 | Coins per receipt | **2** |
-| Coins on the ledger (theorems × 2) | **5,214** |
+| Coins on the ledger (theorems × 2) | **5,286** |
 | Coins on signed receipts (× 2) | **58** |
-| Released versions (git tags) | **873** |
+| Released versions (git tags) | **875** |
 | Tracked, content-addressed files | **513** |
 
-Latest release: **v9.2.5**. The fair-exchange unit is **2 coins = 2 bits** (110 − 108 = 2 = −χ genus-2) per receipt. One 64-bit harmony coin is minted per fused `src` `report()` module — see the [state dashboard](/dashboard) for the harmonic root.
+Latest release: **v9.2.7**. The fair-exchange unit is **2 coins = 2 bits** (110 − 108 = 2 = −χ genus-2) per receipt. One 64-bit harmony coin is minted per fused `src` `report()` module — see the [state dashboard](/dashboard) for the harmonic root.
 
 ## Bounty — denominated in bits
 
-The bounty for each accepted contribution is **2 bits (2 coins)** — the same fair-exchange unit, earned by the deed (a gate-passing, receipted contribution) and owed by commercial use. Total bounty accounted on the ledger so far: **5,214 bits**. This is an accounting bounty in bits/coins — **integrity, not a cash prize**. Heroes and traitors by deeds, not claims.
+The bounty for each accepted contribution is **2 bits (2 coins)** — the same fair-exchange unit, earned by the deed (a gate-passing, receipted contribution) and owed by commercial use. Total bounty accounted on the ledger so far: **5,286 bits**. This is an accounting bounty in bits/coins — **integrity, not a cash prize**. Heroes and traitors by deeds, not claims.
 
 **Not tracked here: tokens.** This repo measures coins (2 per receipt) and 64-bit harmony coins; it does not measure tokens, so no token count or token-to-coin rate is shown — measuring an unmeasured quantity would be an assertion without a receipt. Measure, do not assert.
 
-Page content-address: `8dcb7909-eebf-8ea4-8ffe-9a27f30d01d6`. Integrity, not truth.
+Page content-address: `ef3135f5-191c-8ca1-bbaf-d55b3ccd656d`. Integrity, not truth.

package/AXIOMS.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ title: The axiom index — what is assumed
 # The axiom index
 
 Every declaration in `src/proof` is checked with `#print axioms` on each build, and a dependency on any
-axiom fails the build rather than earning a footnote. All **668** report the same thing:
+axiom fails the build rather than earning a footnote. All **704** report the same thing:
 *does not depend on any axioms*.
 
 That is a real property, and it is not the whole picture. **Axiom-free is not assumption-free.** These
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ def isCarmichael (n : Nat) : Bool :=
 def bitsF : Nat → Nat → Nat
 ```
 
-### `demand2.lean` — 17 definition(s), 8 theorem(s)
+### `demand2.lean` — 17 definition(s), 11 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def sumPow (p n : Nat) : Nat := (List.range' 1 n).foldl (fun a k => a + k ^ p) 0
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ def step : List Nat → List Nat
 def hh : Nat → List Nat → Bool
 ```
 
-### `elementary.lean` — 24 definition(s), 36 theorem(s)
+### `elementary.lean` — 24 definition(s), 37 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def properDivisorSum (n : Nat) : Nat := ((List.range' 1 (n - 1)).filter (fun d => n % d == 0)).foldl (· + ·) 0
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ def residueMg (litres tds : Nat) : Nat := litres * tds
 def atomsOf (m : Nat) : Option (Nat × Nat) :=
 ```
 
-### `families.lean` — 44 definition(s), 46 theorem(s)
+### `families.lean` — 44 definition(s), 55 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def primesUpTo30 : List Nat := [2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29]
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ def saving (value verify : Nat) : Nat := value - verify
 def addr4 (x : Nat) : Nat := x % 16
 ```
 
-### `light.lean` — 13 definition(s), 13 theorem(s)
+### `light.lean` — 13 definition(s), 14 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def c : Nat := 299792458      -- m/s, exact
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ def kcdDoubled : Nat := 1366     -- K_cd expressed against a unit half the size;
 def alternative : List Nat := [c, dNuCs, hDigits, eDigits, kDigits, naDigits, kcdDoubled]
 ```
 
-### `mechanical.lean` — 5 definition(s), 112 theorem(s)
+### `mechanical.lean` — 5 definition(s), 119 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def M9 (n : Nat) : Nat := n % 9
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ def par3 (n : Nat) : Nat := (bit n 0 + bit n 1 + bit n 2) % 2
 def ghzXSupport : List Nat := [0, 3, 5, 6]
 ```
 
-### `reach.lean` — 2 definition(s), 5 theorem(s)
+### `reach.lean` — 2 definition(s), 8 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def bounds : List Nat := List.range' 1 50
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ def instruments : List Instrument :=
 def settledHere : Nat := 8
 ```
 
-### `sequences.lean` — 7 definition(s), 12 theorem(s)
+### `sequences.lean` — 7 definition(s), 13 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def fib : Nat → Nat
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ def logOrbit (u : Nat) : Option Nat := (List.range 6).find? (fun k => orbit k ==
 def settledHere : Nat := 21
 ```
 
-### `z9plus.lean` — 16 definition(s), 32 theorem(s)
+### `z9plus.lean` — 16 definition(s), 43 theorem(s)
 
 ```lean
 def m9 (n : Nat) : Nat := n % 9
@@ -569,6 +569,6 @@ def gcd9 (a b : Nat) : Nat := gcdF (a + b + 1) a b
 
 ---
 
-**668** declarations, **0** axiom dependencies, **321** definitions they rest on.
+**704** declarations, **0** axiom dependencies, **321** definitions they rest on.
 A content-address proves integrity, not truth, and an axiom index proves neither: it states what was
 assumed, so a reader can disagree with the assumptions rather than guess at them.

package/CHALLENGES.md

@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ title: Challenges
 
 **Humanity: 1 / 7** (6 open). The author's own claim, that the seven are solved through involution, is stated in his name on the front page.
 
-## Discovered theorems (decidable, over ℤ/9) — 2607 standing in 1 families
+## Discovered theorems (decidable, over ℤ/9) — 2643 standing in 1 families
 
 Computed by exhaustion, each a monograph with its own page (`/theorem/<key>`) and chained receipt. Grouped by family (largest first) — easy to spot; use the search box for any keyword:
 
-### lean (659)
+### lean (695)
 
 - [lean_address_raw_bytes_of_a](/theorem/lean_address_raw_bytes_of_a) — lean address.lean: raw_bytes_of_a — rawBytes A = [88, 118, 248, 251, 63, 149, 14, 202, 10, 251, 189, 97, 221, 134, 206, 204] — decided by the Lean kernel over its whole finite domain, axiom-free  ·  `211de25d-e843…`
 - [lean_address_to_uuid_bytes_of_a](/theorem/lean_address_to_uuid_bytes_of_a) — lean address.lean: to_uuid_bytes_of_a — toUuidBytes A = [88, 118, 248, 251, 63, 149, 142, 202, 138, 251, 189, 97, 221, 134, 206, 204] — decided by the Lean kernel over its whole finite domain, axiom-free  ·  `c3f88cb7-dd38…`
@@ -717,6 +717,78 @@ Computed by exhaustion, each a monograph with its own page (`/theorem/<key>`) an
   intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `3159b043-f18c…`
 - [lean_split_the_coin_step_and_the_coins_are_inverse_for_every_c](/theorem/lean_split_the_coin_step_and_the_coins_are_inverse_for_every_c) — lean split.lean: the_coin_step_and_the_coins_are_inverse_for_every_c — ∀ c : Nat, 3 * c / 3 = c ∧ (3 * c) % 3 = 0 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
   intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `1c1ebe41-4e80…`
+- [lean_light_the_second_returns_from_the_metre_and_the_period_for_every_s](/theorem/lean_light_the_second_returns_from_the_metre_and_the_period_for_every_s) — lean light.lean: the_second_returns_from_the_metre_and_the_period_for_every_s — ∀ s : Nat, travel s / c = s ∧ periods s / dNuCs = s — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `1de974bb-854a…`
+- [lean_mechanical_repeated_doubling_is_the_power_of_two_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_mechanical_repeated_doubling_is_the_power_of_two_for_every_k) — lean mechanical.lean: repeated_doubling_is_the_power_of_two_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, dbl k = 2 ^ k — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `71d6eeaa-fd06…`
+- [lean_mechanical_relation_digitroot_is_residue_mod9_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_mechanical_relation_digitroot_is_residue_mod9_for_every_n) — lean mechanical.lean: relation_digitroot_is_residue_mod9_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 0 &lt; n → DR n = (n - 1) % 9 + 1 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `22aed33c-e7ff…`
+- [lean_mechanical_the_nine_times_table_always_digital_roots_to_nine_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_mechanical_the_nine_times_table_always_digital_roots_to_nine_for_every_k) — lean mechanical.lean: the_nine_times_table_always_digital_roots_to_nine_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, 0 &lt; k → DR (9 * k) = 9 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `36b3b4ea-25f1…`
+- [lean_mechanical_the_digital_root_has_the_residue_of_its_number](/theorem/lean_mechanical_the_digital_root_has_the_residue_of_its_number) — lean mechanical.lean: the_digital_root_has_the_residue_of_its_number — ∀ n : Nat, DR n % 9 = n % 9 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `efc4383f-1f52…`
+- [lean_mechanical_a_digital_root_lies_between_one_and_nine](/theorem/lean_mechanical_a_digital_root_lies_between_one_and_nine) — lean mechanical.lean: a_digital_root_lies_between_one_and_nine — ∀ n : Nat, 0 &lt; n → 1 ≤ DR n ∧ DR n ≤ 9 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `298da32e-60d7…`
+- [lean_mechanical_casting_out_nines_is_multiplicative_for_every_a_b](/theorem/lean_mechanical_casting_out_nines_is_multiplicative_for_every_a_b) — lean mechanical.lean: casting_out_nines_is_multiplicative_for_every_a_b — ∀ a b : Nat, DR (a * b) = DR (DR a * DR b) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `58842a8d-45b2…`
+- [lean_mechanical_the_moduli_dimensions_are_three_g_minus_three_and_six_g_minus_six_for_every_g](/theorem/lean_mechanical_the_moduli_dimensions_are_three_g_minus_three_and_six_g_minus_six_for_every_g) — lean mechanical.lean: the_moduli_dimensions_are_three_g_minus_three_and_six_g_minus_six_for_every_g — ∀ g : Nat, 3 * g - 3 = (6 * g - 6) / 2 ∧ 6 * g - 6 = 2 * (3 * g - 3) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `633ba212-336a…`
+- [lean_reach_exhaustion_never_reaches_its_own_bound_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_reach_exhaustion_never_reaches_its_own_bound_for_every_n) — lean reach.lean: exhaustion_never_reaches_its_own_bound_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, (List.range n).length = n ∧ n ∉ List.range n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `dfc2849f-3870…`
+- [lean_reach_the_successor_of_every_bound_lies_outside_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_reach_the_successor_of_every_bound_lies_outside_for_every_n) — lean reach.lean: the_successor_of_every_bound_lies_outside_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, n + 1 ∉ List.range n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `1113761c-4967…`
+- [lean_reach_doubling_the_domain_leaves_the_same_hole_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_reach_doubling_the_domain_leaves_the_same_hole_for_every_n) — lean reach.lean: doubling_the_domain_leaves_the_same_hole_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 2 * n ∉ List.range (2 * n) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `f57338c8-104b…`
+- [lean_z9plus_doubling_has_period_six_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_z9plus_doubling_has_period_six_for_every_k) — lean z9plus.lean: doubling_has_period_six_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, pw 2 (k + 6) = pw 2 k — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `2c9ca8bc-08a6…`
+- [lean_z9plus_orbit_digital_roots_have_period_six_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_z9plus_orbit_digital_roots_have_period_six_for_every_k) — lean z9plus.lean: orbit_digital_roots_have_period_six_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, dr (pw 2 (k + 6)) = dr (pw 2 k) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `e88dfdf8-3c33…`
+- [lean_z9plus_the_doubling_orbit_is_read_from_the_exponent_mod_six](/theorem/lean_z9plus_the_doubling_orbit_is_read_from_the_exponent_mod_six) — lean z9plus.lean: the_doubling_orbit_is_read_from_the_exponent_mod_six — ∀ k : Nat, pw 2 k = pw 2 (k % 6) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `c688c966-b59f…`
+- [lean_z9plus_the_orbit_never_meets_the_triad_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_z9plus_the_orbit_never_meets_the_triad_for_every_k) — lean z9plus.lean: the_orbit_never_meets_the_triad_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, pw 2 k ≠ 0 ∧ pw 2 k ≠ 3 ∧ pw 2 k ≠ 6 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `8c3dfc38-91e6…`
+- [lean_z9plus_fibonacci_residues_mod_nine_repeat_every_twenty_four_steps](/theorem/lean_z9plus_fibonacci_residues_mod_nine_repeat_every_twenty_four_steps) — lean z9plus.lean: fibonacci_residues_mod_nine_repeat_every_twenty_four_steps — ∀ k : Nat, fib (k + 24) % 9 = fib k % 9 ∧ fib (k + 25) % 9 = fib (k + 1) % 9 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `04f6a9cd-b19f…`
+- [lean_z9plus_pisano_period_mod_nine_is_twenty_four_for_every_k](/theorem/lean_z9plus_pisano_period_mod_nine_is_twenty_four_for_every_k) — lean z9plus.lean: pisano_period_mod_nine_is_twenty_four_for_every_k — ∀ k : Nat, fib9 (k + 24) = fib9 k — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `985c1ebe-dc19…`
+- [lean_z9plus_the_fuelled_gcd_is_the_gcd_when_the_fuel_exceeds_the_second_argument](/theorem/lean_z9plus_the_fuelled_gcd_is_the_gcd_when_the_fuel_exceeds_the_second_argument) — lean z9plus.lean: the_fuelled_gcd_is_the_gcd_when_the_fuel_exceeds_the_second_argument — ∀ f a b : Nat, b &lt; f → gcdF f a b = Nat.gcd a b — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `73c32b16-76ca…`
+- [lean_z9plus_consecutive_fibonacci_numbers_are_coprime](/theorem/lean_z9plus_consecutive_fibonacci_numbers_are_coprime) — lean z9plus.lean: consecutive_fibonacci_numbers_are_coprime — ∀ n : Nat, Nat.gcd (fib n) (fib (n + 1)) = 1 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `5ae6ebcf-4c89…`
+- [lean_z9plus_consecutive_fibonacci_are_coprime_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_z9plus_consecutive_fibonacci_are_coprime_for_every_n) — lean z9plus.lean: consecutive_fibonacci_are_coprime_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, gcd9 (fib n) (fib (n + 1)) = 1 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `424d4751-1648…`
+- [lean_z9plus_digital_root_agrees_with_the_residue_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_z9plus_digital_root_agrees_with_the_residue_for_every_n) — lean z9plus.lean: digital_root_agrees_with_the_residue_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 0 &lt; n → (dr n = 9 ↔ m9 n = 0) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `20da0230-2b9f…`
+- [lean_z9plus_digital_root_is_the_digit_sum_residue_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_z9plus_digital_root_is_the_digit_sum_residue_for_every_n) — lean z9plus.lean: digital_root_is_the_digit_sum_residue_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, m9 (digitSum n) = m9 n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `694fefdf-a71b…`
+- [lean_demand2_the_two_power_sums_are_one_sum](/theorem/lean_demand2_the_two_power_sums_are_one_sum) — lean demand2.lean: the_two_power_sums_are_one_sum — ∀ p n : Nat, sumPow p n = powSum p n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `6551630b-4917…`
+- [lean_demand2_nicomachus_sum_of_cubes_is_the_square_of_the_triangular_number_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_demand2_nicomachus_sum_of_cubes_is_the_square_of_the_triangular_number_for_every_n) — lean demand2.lean: nicomachus_sum_of_cubes_is_the_square_of_the_triangular_number_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, sumPow 3 n = tri n * tri n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `7aa0bbe0-b4ae…`
+- [lean_demand2_the_sum_of_fifth_powers_has_the_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_demand2_the_sum_of_fifth_powers_has_the_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean demand2.lean: the_sum_of_fifth_powers_has_the_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 12 * sumPow 5 n = n * n * (n + 1) * (n + 1) * (2 * n * n + 2 * n - 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `6916652f-bda2…`
+- [lean_elementary_the_lucas_numbers_are_the_sum_of_the_neighbouring_fibonaccis_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_elementary_the_lucas_numbers_are_the_sum_of_the_neighbouring_fibonaccis_for_every_n) — lean elementary.lean: the_lucas_numbers_are_the_sum_of_the_neighbouring_fibonaccis_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, lucas (n + 1) = fib n + fib (n + 2) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  have), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `cacb33f1-2fc1…`
+- [lean_families_cassinis_identity_for_every_m](/theorem/lean_families_cassinis_identity_for_every_m) — lean families.lean: cassinis_identity_for_every_m — ∀ m : Nat, fib (2 * m + 1) * fib (2 * m + 3) = fib (2 * m + 2) * fib (2 * m + 2) + 1 ∧ fib (2 * m) * fib (2 * m + 2) + 1 = fib (2 * m + 1) * fib (2 * m + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `75a810f1-ae27…`
+- [lean_families_a_sum_over_one_to_n_plus_one_adds_the_last_term](/theorem/lean_families_a_sum_over_one_to_n_plus_one_adds_the_last_term) — lean families.lean: a_sum_over_one_to_n_plus_one_adds_the_last_term — ∀ (g : Nat → Nat) (n : Nat), ((List.range' 1 (n + 1)).map g).foldl (· + ·) 0 = ((List.range' 1 n).map g).foldl (· + ·) 0 + g (n + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `f664ca1d-8371…`
+- [lean_families_the_numbers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_numbers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_numbers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 2 * powSum 1 n = n * (n + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `34fa9fc8-b8ed…`
+- [lean_families_the_squares_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_squares_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_squares_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 6 * powSum 2 n = n * (n + 1) * (2 * n + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `0b7a0569-fb3f…`
+- [lean_families_the_cubes_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_cubes_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_cubes_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 4 * powSum 3 n = n * n * (n + 1) * (n + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `96b0047e-cf09…`
+- [lean_families_the_fourth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_fourth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_fourth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 30 * powSum 4 n = n * (n + 1) * (2 * n + 1) * (3 * n * n + 3 * n - 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `3419aabd-970f…`
+- [lean_families_the_fifth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_fifth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_fifth_powers_sum_to_their_closed_form_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, 12 * powSum 5 n = n * n * (n + 1) * (n + 1) * (2 * n * n + 2 * n - 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `790310ea-f06d…`
+- [lean_families_power_sums_match_their_closed_forms_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_power_sums_match_their_closed_forms_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: power_sums_match_their_closed_forms_for_every_n — ∀ k n : Nat, 1 ≤ k → k ≤ 5 → powSum k n = faulhaber k n — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `04b04822-598b…`
+- [lean_families_the_sums_of_triangular_numbers_are_the_tetrahedral_numbers_for_every_n](/theorem/lean_families_the_sums_of_triangular_numbers_are_the_tetrahedral_numbers_for_every_n) — lean families.lean: the_sums_of_triangular_numbers_are_the_tetrahedral_numbers_for_every_n — ∀ n : Nat, ((List.range' 1 n).map (fun i =&gt; i * (i + 1) / 2)).foldl (· + ·) 0 = n * (n + 1) * (n + 2) / 6 — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  have), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `43b9cdd8-7110…`
+- [lean_sequences_cassinis_identity_for_every_m](/theorem/lean_sequences_cassinis_identity_for_every_m) — lean sequences.lean: cassinis_identity_for_every_m — ∀ m : Nat, fib (2 * m + 1) * fib (2 * m + 3) = fib (2 * m + 2) * fib (2 * m + 2) + 1 ∧ fib (2 * m) * fib (2 * m + 2) + 1 = fib (2 * m + 1) * fib (2 * m + 1) — proved by the Lean kernel for every value (by
+  intro), standard axioms only — checked by lean.ts  ·  `3b815427-42b8…`
 
 ### other — one-of-a-kind (0)
 
@@ -2301,4 +2373,4 @@ Each was withdrawn for want of a Lean proof and has since been given one, at a n
 
 </details>
 
-Page content-address: `4e169beb-6823-88a4-837b-857f530d6f0b`. Integrity, not truth.
+Page content-address: `3778356e-7bfa-806f-8d89-3df0fc8dd2d0`. Integrity, not truth.

package/PRIOR-ART.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ head:
 ---
 # Prior art — what is restated, what is claimed, and the difference
 
-Of 668 machine-checked declarations, **659** restate work that already has an author and
+Of 704 machine-checked declarations, **695** restate work that already has an author and
 **9** are about this deposit's own construction. Each source file declares which it is, in its own
 frontmatter; [`src/proof/priorart.lean`](https://github.com/ceccec/millennium-solutions/blob/main/src/proof/priorart.lean)
 holds the same partition as a table the kernel decides over, and the build fails if the two disagree.
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ fact about the world, and this deposit does not assert it.
 
 | | theorems |
 |---|---|
-| attributed to named earlier work | **659** |
+| attributed to named earlier work | **695** |
 | unclassified — no search performed, status unknown | **9** |
 | claimed as novel | **0** |
 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ searched, where, and when. An earlier version of this page claimed novelty for 1
 that nothing earlier exists because no one went to check is the same defect as asserting a proof because no
 one went to read it.
 
-## Restated from named earlier work — 32 sources, 659 theorems
+## Restated from named earlier work — 32 sources, 695 theorems
 
 No novelty is claimed over any of these. What is done here is to decide each over a stated finite domain,
 which is a contribution of verification, not of discovery.
@@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ which is a contribution of verification, not of discovery.
 <tr><td><code>address.lean</code></td><td>18</td><td>content addressing</td><td>composes FNV-1a (Fowler, Noll, Vo, 1991) with the Merkle hash tree (Merkle, 1979)</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>coin.lean</code></td><td>12</td><td>the method of complements</td><td>the reflection d ↦ 10 − d is the TEN'S COMPLEMENT, and its sibling 9 − d the nines' complement — the method of complements, used to turn subtraction into addition in Pascal's calculator (1642), the Comptometer and the Curta, and in modern computer arithmetic. That it is an involution with a single fixed point is the property those machines rely on. Searched 2026-09-04, term "method of complements / nines' complement / ten's complement"; prior art found and credited</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>demand.lean</code></td><td>9</td><td>elementary number theory</td><td>the named results the search data asks for — Bézout’s identity (Étienne Bézout, 1779; Bachet, 1624), the Chinese remainder theorem (Sunzi, c. 3rd–5th century), and others named in their theorems</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>demand2.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>elementary number theory, second tier</td><td>Wilson’s theorem — John Wilson; first proved by Joseph-Louis Lagrange, 1771; the Catalan conjecture on consecutive perfect powers — Eugène Catalan, 1844; proved by Preda Mihăilescu, 2002</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>demand2.lean</code></td><td>11</td><td>elementary number theory, second tier</td><td>Wilson’s theorem — John Wilson; first proved by Joseph-Louis Lagrange, 1771; the Catalan conjecture on consecutive perfect powers — Eugène Catalan, 1844; proved by Preda Mihăilescu, 2002</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>demand3.lean</code></td><td>14</td><td>elementary number theory, named results</td><td>Legendre’s three-square theorem — Adrien-Marie Legendre, 1797; Carmichael numbers — Robert Carmichael, 1910; amicable pairs — known to antiquity</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>elementary.lean</code></td><td>36</td><td>elementary number theory and combinatorial game theory</td><td>Euclid (Elements IX.36) and Euler for the even perfect numbers; the amicable pair</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>elementary.lean</code></td><td>37</td><td>elementary number theory and combinatorial game theory</td><td>Euclid (Elements IX.36) and Euler for the even perfect numbers; the amicable pair</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>energy.lean</code></td><td>22</td><td>electrochemistry and combustion</td><td>the laws of electrolysis — Michael Faraday, 1834; the enthalpy of combustion of hydrogen, standard physical chemistry</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>families.lean</code></td><td>46</td><td>modular arithmetic, quantified</td><td>quantifies the ℤ/9 arithmetic above; the underlying results are Fermat’s, Euler’s and Gauss’s</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>families.lean</code></td><td>55</td><td>modular arithmetic, quantified</td><td>quantifies the ℤ/9 arithmetic above; the underlying results are Fermat’s, Euler’s and Gauss’s</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>flow.lean</code></td><td>3</td><td>elementary number theory — the multiplicative order of 2 modulo 9</td><td>2⁶ = 64 ≡ 1 (mod 9), so the powers of two modulo 9 repeat with period six — Euler's</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>fnv.lean</code></td><td>13</td><td>non-cryptographic hashing</td><td>FNV-1a — Glenn Fowler, Landon Curt Noll and Phong Vo, 1991</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>generated.lean</code></td><td>13</td><td>elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9 and the doubling orbit</td><td>the structure underneath is standard and is credited. The doubling orbit</td></tr>
@@ -68,28 +68,28 @@ which is a contribution of verification, not of discovery.
 <tr><td><code>index.lean</code></td><td>11</td><td>elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9 and the doubling orbit</td><td>the structure underneath is standard and is credited. The doubling orbit</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>involution.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>elementary group theory — orbit decomposition of an order-two permutation</td><td>that a permutation of order two decomposes a finite set into fixed points and</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>ledgerclaims.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>hash trees and membership proofs</td><td>`membership_grows_by_one_seal_per_doubling` and `membership_is_logarithmic_not_linear`</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>light.lean</code></td><td>13</td><td>metrology — the International System of Units</td><td>the exact numerical values below are DEFINITIONS adopted by the Conférence Générale des</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>mechanical.lean</code></td><td>112</td><td>Boolean algebra and elementary modular arithmetic</td><td>the Boolean rows are De Morgan's laws — Augustus De Morgan, 1847 — written in the arithmetic of {0,1}; the group rows are the additive group of Z/9. Both long prior. Searched 2026-09-04, terms "De Morgan's laws boolean algebra" and "additive group mod 9"; prior art found and credited</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>light.lean</code></td><td>14</td><td>metrology — the International System of Units</td><td>the exact numerical values below are DEFINITIONS adopted by the Conférence Générale des</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>mechanical.lean</code></td><td>119</td><td>Boolean algebra and elementary modular arithmetic</td><td>the Boolean rows are De Morgan's laws — Augustus De Morgan, 1847 — written in the arithmetic of {0,1}; the group rows are the additive group of Z/9. Both long prior. Searched 2026-09-04, terms "De Morgan's laws boolean algebra" and "additive group mod 9"; prior art found and credited</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>merkaba.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>elementary group theory — subgroups and cosets of Z/9</td><td>the partition into {3,6,9} and two three-element classes closed under doubling is the subgroup and coset structure of Z/9 under the action of U(9); Lagrange. One theorem already credits Euler for the polyhedron formula. Searched 2026-09-04; prior art found and credited</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>merkle.lean</code></td><td>12</td><td>hash trees and membership proofs</td><td>the hash tree — Ralph Merkle, 1979 (thesis); CRYPTO 1987</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>nim.lean</code></td><td>10</td><td>combinatorial game theory</td><td>Nim — Charles L. Bouton, 1901; the Sprague–Grundy theorem — Roland Sprague, 1935 and Patrick M. Grundy, 1939</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>phenomena.lean</code></td><td>4</td><td>metrology and classical physical chemistry</td><td>the SI base quantities and their defining constants are definitions of the Conférence</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>quantum.lean</code></td><td>12</td><td>canonical forms and order-invariant commitments</td><td>sorting a multiset into a canonical order BEFORE folding it is standard practice, not a</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>reach.lean</code></td><td>5</td><td>elementary set theory — the naturals are not exhausted by any finite list</td><td>that no finite set contains every natural number is Euclid's argument in form and is as</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>reach.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>elementary set theory — the naturals are not exhausted by any finite list</td><td>that no finite set contains every natural number is Euclid's argument in form and is as</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>recovered.lean</code></td><td>15</td><td>elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9</td><td>every fact here is standard: the units of ℤ/9 are {1,2,4,5,7,8}, their product is −1</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>reversal.lean</code></td><td>15</td><td>elementary arithmetic</td><td>digit reversal and digit sums; casting out nines, in use by the 12th century</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>rights.lean</code></td><td>9</td><td>copyright law — rights arising without formality</td><td>this file already NAMED its prior art in prose while the attribution table recorded none.</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>sequences.lean</code></td><td>12</td><td>integer sequences and identities</td><td>Cassini’s identity — G. D. Cassini, 1680; Lucas sequences — Édouard Lucas, 1878; the Brahmagupta–Fibonacci identity — Brahmagupta, 628; Pascal’s triangle mod 2 — Blaise Pascal, 1654</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>sequences.lean</code></td><td>13</td><td>integer sequences and identities</td><td>Cassini’s identity — G. D. Cassini, 1680; Lucas sequences — Édouard Lucas, 1878; the Brahmagupta–Fibonacci identity — Brahmagupta, 628; Pascal’s triangle mod 2 — Blaise Pascal, 1654</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>speed.lean</code></td><td>11</td><td>hash trees and membership proofs</td><td>the structural claim is Merkle's and is credited here as merkle.lean already credits it:</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>split.lean</code></td><td>20</td><td>elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9</td><td>the classification this file rests on is standard and is credited: the units of ℤ/9 are</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>theorems.lean</code></td><td>8</td><td>the method of complements</td><td>the universal reflection here is the same ten's complement d ↦ 10 − d as coin.lean, with its centre and its pairs summing to ten. Method of complements, long prior to this deposit. Searched 2026-09-04</td></tr>
 <tr><td><code>z9.lean</code></td><td>22</td><td>modular arithmetic</td><td>Fermat’s little theorem — Pierre de Fermat, 1640; Euler’s theorem — Leonhard Euler, 1763; primitive roots — Carl Friedrich Gauss, 1801</td></tr>
-<tr><td><code>z9plus.lean</code></td><td>32</td><td>modular arithmetic and periodicity</td><td>digital roots (casting out nines) — in use by the 12th century; the Pisano period — after Leonardo Pisano; studied by Joseph-Louis Lagrange, 1774</td></tr>
+<tr><td><code>z9plus.lean</code></td><td>43</td><td>modular arithmetic and periodicity</td><td>digital roots (casting out nines) — in use by the 12th century; the Pisano period — after Leonardo Pisano; studied by Joseph-Louis Lagrange, 1774</td></tr>
 </tbody></table>
 
 ### The domains this touches
 
-- **Boolean algebra and elementary modular arithmetic** — 112 theorems, in `mechanical.lean`
+- **Boolean algebra and elementary modular arithmetic** — 119 theorems, in `mechanical.lean`
 - **canonical forms and order-invariant commitments** — 12 theorems, in `quantum.lean`
 - **combinatorial game theory** — 10 theorems, in `nim.lean`
 - **content addressing** — 18 theorems, in `address.lean`
@@ -99,21 +99,21 @@ which is a contribution of verification, not of discovery.
 - **elementary group theory — orbit decomposition of an order-two permutation** — 8 theorems, in `involution.lean`
 - **elementary group theory — subgroups and cosets of Z/9** — 8 theorems, in `merkaba.lean`
 - **elementary number theory** — 9 theorems, in `demand.lean`
-- **elementary number theory and combinatorial game theory** — 36 theorems, in `elementary.lean`
+- **elementary number theory and combinatorial game theory** — 37 theorems, in `elementary.lean`
 - **elementary number theory — the multiplicative order of 2 modulo 9** — 3 theorems, in `flow.lean`
 - **elementary number theory — the unit group of Z/9** — 118 theorems, in `imagined.lean`
 - **elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9** — 35 theorems, in `recovered.lean`, `split.lean`
 - **elementary number theory — the unit group of ℤ/9 and the doubling orbit** — 24 theorems, in `generated.lean`, `index.lean`
 - **elementary number theory, named results** — 14 theorems, in `demand3.lean`
-- **elementary number theory, second tier** — 8 theorems, in `demand2.lean`
-- **elementary set theory — the naturals are not exhausted by any finite list** — 5 theorems, in `reach.lean`
+- **elementary number theory, second tier** — 11 theorems, in `demand2.lean`
+- **elementary set theory — the naturals are not exhausted by any finite list** — 8 theorems, in `reach.lean`
 - **hash trees and membership proofs** — 31 theorems, in `ledgerclaims.lean`, `merkle.lean`, `speed.lean`
-- **integer sequences and identities** — 12 theorems, in `sequences.lean`
+- **integer sequences and identities** — 13 theorems, in `sequences.lean`
 - **metrology and classical physical chemistry** — 4 theorems, in `phenomena.lean`
-- **metrology — the International System of Units** — 13 theorems, in `light.lean`
+- **metrology — the International System of Units** — 14 theorems, in `light.lean`
 - **modular arithmetic** — 22 theorems, in `z9.lean`
-- **modular arithmetic and periodicity** — 32 theorems, in `z9plus.lean`
-- **modular arithmetic, quantified** — 46 theorems, in `families.lean`
+- **modular arithmetic and periodicity** — 43 theorems, in `z9plus.lean`
+- **modular arithmetic, quantified** — 55 theorems, in `families.lean`
 - **non-cryptographic hashing** — 13 theorems, in `fnv.lean`
 - **the method of complements** — 20 theorems, in `coin.lean`, `theorems.lean`
 

package/README.md

@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ last because the orbit never reaches it.
 
 ## 1 · What is proved
 
-- The formal layer holds 668 kernel-accepted declarations across 33 files, and no file uses sorry or native_decide outside a comment.
-  <sub>SEALED · `5b572b0c-b2d2-818d-a04b-872fb40cf148`</sub>
-- 625 of those 668 are THEOREMS by this deposit's own rule — they close by decide, which is to say the kernel evaluates the proposition over its whole finite domain rather than accepting a declaration; the remaining 43 close by rfl and are declarations.
-  <sub>SEALED · `60127119-9f91-8237-ab90-32e842954a26`</sub>
-- 743 of them are sealed into the ledger, each carrying a receipt derived from the one before it.
-  <sub>SEALED · `df22e3e4-7d4e-8cbd-9325-d8cc5bf95d14`</sub>
+- The formal layer holds 704 kernel-accepted declarations across 33 files, and no file uses sorry or native_decide outside a comment.
+  <sub>SEALED · `e4bd2d16-b7aa-8e7d-850a-9fb467ef588f`</sub>
+- 625 of those 704 are THEOREMS by this deposit's own rule — they close by decide, which is to say the kernel evaluates the proposition over its whole finite domain rather than accepting a declaration; the remaining 79 close by rfl and are declarations.
+  <sub>SEALED · `0f333153-13b1-82ed-842d-5fb0ab0fc0f2`</sub>
+- 779 of them are sealed into the ledger, each carrying a receipt derived from the one before it.
+  <sub>SEALED · `0199dfbb-e1a6-819d-968d-ae5d42634e6e`</sub>
 
 ## 2 · The ring
 
@@ -39,10 +39,10 @@ last because the orbit never reaches it.
 
 ## 7 · The ledger
 
-- The ledger records 2607 entries with 0 chain breaks, 0 duplicate keys and 0 duplicate receipts.
-  <sub>SEALED · `68aab3ce-8188-83a5-830d-756a4e441dd3`</sub>
-- The count is 2607, which is 325 octaves and 7 over — the octave is a target the theorems earn, never a quota they are invented to fill.
-  <sub>SEALED · `d5875268-0019-81c3-a3bc-6779c8ffb6ee`</sub>
+- The ledger records 2643 entries with 0 chain breaks, 0 duplicate keys and 0 duplicate receipts.
+  <sub>SEALED · `4e1db028-dd3b-8957-bf46-c3a1699d2ba0`</sub>
+- The count is 2643, which is 330 octaves and 3 over — the octave is a target the theorems earn, never a quota they are invented to fill.
+  <sub>SEALED · `c07a1cee-06bd-8427-bae0-b30d2f9602ea`</sub>
 
 ## 5 · What the gate does and does not do
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ results; it is the result, read off the same arithmetic that produced the table.
 
 ## 7 · The proofs, as they document themselves
 
-33 Lean files in 7 wings, 668 declarations of which 659 are theorems. The prose in this section is read out of the
+33 Lean files in 7 wings, 704 declarations of which 695 are theorems. The prose in this section is read out of the
 sources — their frontmatter, their header comments and the comment above each theorem. Editing a proof edits
 this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **The two-sided coin** — `coin.lean`, 12 theorem(s). One involution on ten digits, two sides, one fixed point, and one digit that leaves.
 
-**Elementary arithmetic** — `elementary.lean`, 36 theorem(s). the DECISION of each over a stated finite range, axiom-free, and the honest record of where the range   stops short of what the older claim asserted. prior_art_search: the results are named in every undergraduate text; no search was needed to find them. prior_art_pool: named Elementary arithmetic, decided — the claims the ledger held in TypeScript, given a kernel.
+**Elementary arithmetic** — `elementary.lean`, 37 theorem(s). the DECISION of each over a stated finite range, axiom-free, and the honest record of where the range   stops short of what the older claim asserted. prior_art_search: the results are named in every undergraduate text; no search was needed to find them. prior_art_pool: named Elementary arithmetic, decided — the claims the ledger held in TypeScript, given a kernel.
 
-**Families over the ring** — `families.lean`, 46 theorem(s). The families, quantified. Proving at scale.
+**Families over the ring** — `families.lean`, 55 theorem(s). The families, quantified. Proving at scale.
 
 **The doubling flow, for every step** — `flow.lean`, 3 theorem(s). prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-14, terms "powers of two modulo 9 period 6 order of 2   mod 9 Euler theorem"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded prior_art_own: the every-step bound of the doubling flow, stated for the Navier–Stokes theorem in index.lean
 
@@ -114,19 +114,19 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **The merkaba** — `merkaba.lean`, 8 theorem(s). (Leonhard Euler, 1758). The file as a whole is this deposit's own construction, and this ONE   declaration restates a named classical result: its third conjunct 4 + 4 - 6 = 2 IS the Euler   characteristic of the tetrahedron. The comment above that theorem already named Euler; the register   did not, because prior art was routed on the FILE and a file-level row cannot say "own work except   theorem 7". No priority over Euler is claimed. What is this deposit's own here is the pairing of the   two tetrahedra with the cube Q₃ and the vertex and edge counts around it, not the characteristic. The merkaba, as THIS deposit constructs it — ported to Lean so it stands on the kernel instead of on a TypeScript test. Six entries under this name were revoked as dirty; every one of them that states finite algebra is re-proved here, and the two that do not (a cosine field, a bond angle in degrees) are absent on purpose — they are real trigonometry, not decidable arithmetic over ℤ/9, and padding them in would be the exact dishonesty the revocation was for.
 
-**Sequences** — `sequences.lean`, 12 theorem(s). The ledger held these as TypeScript tests. Each is a classical identity with a real proof; what is done here is to DECIDE each over a stated finite range, which is what `decide` can honestly deliver — the range is named in every theorem rather than implied, and no theorem claims the general case.
+**Sequences** — `sequences.lean`, 13 theorem(s). The ledger held these as TypeScript tests. Each is a classical identity with a real proof; what is done here is to DECIDE each over a stated finite range, which is what `decide` can honestly deliver — the range is named in every theorem rather than implied, and no theorem claims the general case.
 
 **The digit split** — `split.lean`, 20 theorem(s). mathematics and claim nothing.   Stated precisely so the credit does not run past the earlier work: what is NOT claimed as prior art is   the tokenisation itself — reading the digits as 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 by concatenating consecutive units into   two-digit tokens, and the arithmetic that follows from it (every token a multiple of three, closure of   the tokens under addition and multiplication). That arrangement is this deposit's presentation of a   standard fact, and its verification is by exhaustion here. Crediting an earlier author for a   presentation they did not make is the same defect as claiming their result, pointed the other way. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "units and non-units of Z/9 multiplicative   inverses group of units modulo 9"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: mixed   the digit grouping is generic arithmetic; the coin accounting it feeds is this deposit's.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: the digit grouping 0|12|3|45|6|78|9 as this deposit reads it The ten digits read in order and grouped 0 | 12 | 3 | 45 | 6 | 78 | 9 — and what that grouping is.
 
 **The ring ℤ/9** — `z9.lean`, 22 theorem(s). The ℤ/9 families — mechanically generated theorems, proved by decide rather than tested in TypeScript.
 
-**Entanglement in the ring** — `z9plus.lean`, 32 theorem(s). z9.lean settled the families exhaustively. This settles the claims the ledger stated individually and never generalised: which residues squares and cubes can be, which residues are primitive roots, the period of the doubling orbit's digital root, and the identity behind digit-reversal invariance. Each is stated as an EQUIVALENCE or an exact set where the ledger stated instances, so the negative half is proved too.
+**Entanglement in the ring** — `z9plus.lean`, 43 theorem(s). z9.lean settled the families exhaustively. This settles the claims the ledger stated individually and never generalised: which residues squares and cubes can be, which residues are primitive roots, the period of the doubling orbit's digital root, and the identity behind digit-reversal invariance. Each is stated as an EQUIVALENCE or an exact set where the ledger stated instances, so the negative half is proved too.
 
 ### the floor
 
 **What is actually being asked for** — `demand.lean`, 9 theorem(s). THE ONE WING THAT DID NOT COME FROM THIS DEPOSIT'S OWN INTERESTS. Every other file here proves what the ℤ/9 construction led to. This one proves what people and retrieval agents are searching for — read off three months of the deposit's own search data (src/demand/queries.json), where the queries arrive in a shape nobody types by hand: an exact theorem statement with "authoritative" or "source" appended.
 
-**The next tier of what is asked for** — `demand2.lean`, 8 theorem(s). THE SECOND COURSE OF THE SAME FLOOR. `demand.lean` closed the top eight topics in src/demand/queries.json; this file takes the next eight, chosen the same way — by impressions, not by taste. The demand map is three months of the deposit's own Google Search Console data with the retrieval scaffolding stripped, so what is ranked is the TOPIC people wanted a citable source for, not the phrasing they reached for.
+**The next tier of what is asked for** — `demand2.lean`, 11 theorem(s). THE SECOND COURSE OF THE SAME FLOOR. `demand.lean` closed the top eight topics in src/demand/queries.json; this file takes the next eight, chosen the same way — by impressions, not by taste. The demand map is three months of the deposit's own Google Search Console data with the retrieval scaffolding stripped, so what is ranked is the TOPIC people wanted a citable source for, not the phrasing they reached for.
 
 **The named theorems people ask for** — `demand3.lean`, 14 theorem(s). The third and last tier the search data supports. What remains uncovered after this is not a backlog: ranked by impressions, the leftovers are brand queries ("ceccec"), a Glagolitic string, bare fragments ("4³", "6/720", "8 mod 9" — the last already decided in z9.lean), and the real-analysis cluster that was refused in demand2.lean and stays refused. The demand map is close to exhausted of things a kernel can settle, which is a better place to stop than an arbitrary count would have been.
 
@@ -134,13 +134,13 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **The Millennium floor** — `index.lean`, 11 theorem(s). Bounded, so the credit stops where the earlier work does: what is NOT prior art is the use of that orbit as a floor for what this deposit does   and does not settle, which is a statement about this repository and has no earlier author.   Verification by exhaustion in Lean is this deposit's contribution, and verification is not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "doubling sequence modulo 9 orbit   1 2 4 8 7 5 cyclic group generator digital root"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded   digit arithmetic of the doubling sequence; searchable independently of this deposit.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: the Millennium floor, computed from this sequence The Millennium floor — seven honest theorems, one per problem, COMPUTED from the sequence.
 
-**Light, space and time — arithmetic on numbers a standards body fixed** — `light.lean`, 13 theorem(s). Poids et Mesures, not results of this deposit: the metre from the speed of light (17th CGPM, 1983) and   the seven defining constants fixed exactly in the 2019 revision of the SI, effective 20 May 2019   (BIPM, https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-defining-constants). Nothing here measures anything.
+**Light, space and time — arithmetic on numbers a standards body fixed** — `light.lean`, 14 theorem(s). Poids et Mesures, not results of this deposit: the metre from the speed of light (17th CGPM, 1983) and   the seven defining constants fixed exactly in the 2019 revision of the SI, effective 20 May 2019   (BIPM, https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-defining-constants). Nothing here measures anything.
 
 **Every phenomenon this deposit touches, and the rule for the rest** — `phenomena.lean`, 4 theorem(s). Générale des Poids et Mesures (2019 revision, effective 20 May 2019); the electrochemical results are   Michael Faraday's laws of electrolysis, 1834, and the standard enthalpy of combustion of hydrogen.   Every physical result named here has an earlier author or a standards body, and none is this deposit's.
 
 **Order-invariance** — `quantum.lean`, 12 theorem(s). form is invariant under permutation of its input, which is why `receipt_is_order_invariant` holds. What   this file contributes is the Lean verification over a stated finite domain and the negative controls   beside it — `naive_fold_is_not_order_invariant` shows the property is bought by the sort and not free,   and `the_receipt_is_not_injective` and `the_invariance_is_canonicalisation_not_physics` state its limits.   Verification and refusal, not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "sorted Merkle tree order-invariant set   commitment canonical ordering leaves"; prior art found and credited. This file was `unclassified` — no   search had ever been run for it — and it is one of the 8 files whose 86 theorems are staged for DOIs. prior_art_pool: mixed   canonicalisation before folding is a searchable technique; the receipt it folds is ours.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: order-invariance of this deposit's receipt The quantum receipt — order invariance, proved rather than asserted.
 
-**What exhaustion reaches, and what lies outside it** — `reach.lean`, 5 theorem(s). old as mathematics; the deposit claims none of it. What is its own here is the decision over its OWN   bounds, and the statement of where that decision stops.
+**What exhaustion reaches, and what lies outside it** — `reach.lean`, 8 theorem(s). old as mathematics; the deposit claims none of it. What is its own here is the decision over its OWN   bounds, and the statement of where that decision stops.
 
 **Why verification is fast, and what it is not** — `speed.lean`, 11 theorem(s). wrong: the cost is logarithmic BECAUSE of a known result, and the repository was already crediting that   result three files away.   Bounded: what is not prior art is the MEASURED constants on this machine (recompute 21,582,900 µs against   a 38 µs walk) and the arithmetic over them. A measurement is not a discovery either, and the file says so. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "Merkle tree membership proof logarithmic   verification path length"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: unbounded   the subject is this deposit's own verification cost.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: this deposit's own verification cost
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **Generated at scale** — `generated.lean`, 13 theorem(s). Bounded, so the credit stops where the earlier work does: what is NOT prior art is the generator that enumerates propositions over this ring and   discards the ones true of every sibling; that machinery is this deposit's own.   Verification by exhaustion in Lean is this deposit's contribution, and verification is not discovery. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "doubling sequence modulo 9 orbit   1 2 4 8 7 5 cyclic group generator digital root"; prior art found and credited. prior_art_pool: bounded   quantified ring arithmetic over Z/9; the underlying facts are classical and searchable.   BOUNDED means a search is well posed and simply has not been run — the row is unclassified because   nobody looked. UNBOUNDED means the subject is this artifact, so there is no pool to search and the   row will stay unclassified however much work is done. They look identical in a count and need   opposite responses, which is the distinction uuidna-49 asked for and nobody had drawn. prior_art_own: this deposit's own generator over its own ring Generated by scripts/lean-gen.ts — do not edit by hand; re-run the generator. Each theorem below quantifies over a whole ledger family. Every one is compiled, audited for axioms, and checked to compute what the ledger's own tests compute at every parameter of its family.
 
-**Mechanically translated** — `mechanical.lean`, 112 theorem(s). Generated by src/prove/emit.ts from the ledger's own tests — do not hand-edit; re-run the prover.
+**Mechanically translated** — `mechanical.lean`, 119 theorem(s). Generated by src/prove/emit.ts from the ledger's own tests — do not hand-edit; re-run the prover.
 
 **Nim** — `nim.lean`, 10 theorem(s). Nim — Bouton's theorem and Sprague–Grundy, decided.
 
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ this page; there is nowhere else to keep the description in step.
 
 **Recovered — claims that computed and were withdrawn for want of a proof** — `recovered.lean`, 15 theorem(s). material, credited. What is NOT prior art is that these particular statements sat WITHDRAWN in this   deposit's ledger, each recorded as "not backed by a Lean proof. Its evidence is a TypeScript test",   while every one is decidable in a line. prior_art_search: literature search performed 2026-09-05, terms "units and non-units of Z/9 multiplicative   inverses group of units modulo 9"; prior art found and credited.
 
-20 of 668 declarations carry no comment of their own and are shown here as the gap they are, not
+20 of 704 declarations carry no comment of their own and are shown here as the gap they are, not
 filled with a template.
 
 ## 8 · What this build measured about itself
@@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ Read from the artefacts at build time, never carried between runs.
 
 | measure | value |
 |---|---|
-| ledger entries | 2,607 — 325 octaves and 7 over |
-| standing — carries its own proof | **659** |
+| ledger entries | 2,643 — 330 octaves and 3 over |
+| standing — carries its own proof | **695** |
 | carried — withdrawn on its own evidence, proved by a live theorem | **434** |
 | withdrawn — nothing proves it | 1,514 |
-| proved in total | **1093** of 2,607 |
-| standing keys → distinct theorems | 659 sealed, 0 of them keyed twice, 0 unresolvable |
-| Lean files · theorems | 33 · 659 theorems (625 closed by exhaustion, axiom-free · 34 proved for every value on propext and Quot.sound) + 9 rfl declarations |
-| proved `by decide` | 625 of 668 |
+| proved in total | **1129** of 2,643 |
+| standing keys → distinct theorems | 695 sealed, 0 of them keyed twice, 0 unresolvable |
+| Lean files · theorems | 33 · 695 theorems (625 closed by exhaustion, axiom-free · 70 proved for every value on propext and Quot.sound) + 9 rfl declarations |
+| proved `by decide` | 625 of 704 |
 | claims a machine can render | 103 of 1,555 |
 | claims needing an author | 1,452 — reported, never faked |
 
@@ -225,4 +225,4 @@ whether the work restates someone earlier. [The paper](/paper) typesets every st
 
 ---
 
-*15 claims, all verified · 659 Lean theorems · 2607 ledger entries · trial root `5729b212-ba9e-8a33-b660-c705ff6f3d3f` · integrity, not truth*
+*15 claims, all verified · 695 Lean theorems · 2643 ledger entries · trial root `e916095e-0d38-804d-aae2-1b9ebec084d2` · integrity, not truth*

package/dashboard.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import { withBase } from 'vitepress'
 ## Fact — measured state
 
 <div class="dash-grid">
-<div class="dash-card"><div class="dash-k">Version</div><div class="dash-v">v9.2.5</div><div class="dash-s">git tag (single source)</div></div>
+<div class="dash-card"><div class="dash-k">Version</div><div class="dash-v">v9.2.7</div><div class="dash-s">git tag (single source)</div></div>
 <div class="dash-card"><div class="dash-k">Honesty gate</div><div class="dash-v">sealed</div><div class="dash-s">every citation live in the ledger</div></div>
 <div class="dash-card"><div class="dash-k">Link coverage</div><div class="dash-v">100%</div><div class="dash-s">gate-enforced — the build fails below 100%</div></div>
 <a class="dash-card" :href="withBase('/sitemap.json')" style="text-decoration:none;display:block"><div class="dash-k">Seal root</div><div class="dash-v" style="color:var(--vp-c-brand-1)">live →</div><div class="dash-s">merkle of the whole, current at /sitemap.json</div></a>

package/forensic.md

@@ -5,18 +5,18 @@ title: Every state change, dated
 # Provenance of this deposit's ledger
 
 **Recomputed on every build** from git history and the append-only ledger. Regenerate with
-`npm run forensic`. Content-address `b9374e82-558b-801a-a1f9-30ad4593e62f`.
+`npm run forensic`. Content-address `2fcd5658-f204-8aaa-8b95-be61446d03bc`.
 
 ## What this record establishes
 
 | | |
 |---|---:|
-| ledger entries | **2,607** |
-| standing — proved and sealed | 659 |
+| ledger entries | **2,643** |
+| standing — proved and sealed | 695 |
 | carried — withdrawn, proved by a live theorem | 434 |
 | withdrawn — nothing currently proves them | 1,514 |
 | receipt chain, recomputed | **0 breaks — intact** |
-| commits that changed ledger state | 578 |
+| commits that changed ledger state | 580 |
 
 ## Why entries were withdrawn — the reason recorded at the time