@cassiomc1/forgeloop 0.1.3 → 0.1.5

package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fifth-live.md

@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+# ForgeLoop Fifth Blind Live Conformance Run
+
+This record documents the fifth blind live conformance experiment. The target
+was disposable, initialized from the published npm package only, and was not
+populated from the ForgeLoop working tree. The experiment used one primary
+agent and stopped when the agent requested approval for a reversible product
+design before creating a serialized contract.
+
+## Environment
+
+- ForgeLoop release source commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
+- Approved merged `main` commit: `550bec7911a48734bc63148539c439308a6cf6f4`
+- ForgeLoop package version: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4`
+- npm tarball URL: `https://registry.npmjs.org/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/-/forgeloop-0.1.4.tgz`
+- Tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`
+- npm integrity SHA-512:
+  `sha512-qBVhtToBbhN1Yrke85WTaG6rl4dAN117QiUx2EN75bp/Hn5ZXxIkTn7U5ml4j//JYjWqABDtCMh2VuJ9FOtcfQ==`
+- Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive agent
+- Model: `gpt-5.6-luna` (configured harness model)
+- Harness: `codex-cli 0.146.0`, `codex exec`
+- Operating system: macOS `26.6.1`, `arm64`
+- Date/time: `2026-08-13T09:28:53-03:00` target registration; agent session
+  started at `2026-08-13T09:29:44-03:00`
+- Reported at: `2026-08-13T09:34:31-03:00`
+- Target path: `/Users/cassio/Documents/github/forgeloop-fifth-blind-live.f39dWl`
+- Conformance mode: Standard
+- Installation procedure: created a new target with zero entries; fetched
+  `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.4` from npm into an external runtime with
+  `npm pack`; verified the tarball SHA-1 and SHA-512 against npm metadata;
+  installed that exact tarball with
+  `npm install --prefix <runtime> --no-save --ignore-scripts <tarball>`;
+  confirmed the installed package and CLI reported `0.1.4`; initialized the
+  target with the installed CLI using `node <runtime>/node_modules/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/src/cli.js init --path <target>`.
+- The target was not copied from the ForgeLoop checkout and no unpublished
+  ForgeLoop files were used to supplement the package.
+
+Execution topology: single-agent
+Agent process count: 1
+Subagents enabled: NO
+Delegation used: NO
+Parallel agents: NO
+Planner/worker split: NO
+Reviewer subagent: NO
+
+The harness configuration was overridden for this invocation with
+`--disable multi_agent` and `agents.enabled=false`. The observable session
+ledger contains one `thread.started` event and no additional agent thread.
+
+## Blind prompt verification
+
+The exact prompt sent to the agent was:
+
+```text
+Create a premium website for a law firm.
+
+It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
+```
+
+The prompt contained no instruction about ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering,
+classification, assumptions, contracts, routing, gates, preflight, lifecycle,
+phases, `forgeloop next`, verification, evidence, receipts, review,
+completion, continuation, or subagents.
+
+- Blind prompt purity: `PASS`
+
+## Blind bootstrap and instruction discovery
+
+The agent's first observable message stated that it would apply the repository
+loop and inspect local instructions. The command log shows reads of:
+
+- `LOOP_ENGINEERING.md`;
+- `PROJECT_PROFILE.md`;
+- `GUIDE_ROUTER.md`;
+- `AGENTS.md`;
+- `CLAUDE.md`;
+- `.forgeloop/manifest.json` and the installed package state;
+- `.github/copilot-instructions.md` and `.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc`;
+- `ENG/perf-code-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/test-code-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/clean-code-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/sec-code-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/premium-sites-studio-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/design-code-eng.md`;
+- `ENG/accessibility-eng.md`.
+
+The agent identified the applicable guide IDs in an observable message as
+`premium`, `design`, `accessibility`, `clean`, `test`, `security`, and
+`performance`. This was discovered from the installed project context and was
+not supplied in the blind prompt.
+
+- Blind bootstrap: `PASS`
+- Instruction discovery: `PASS`
+
+The first observable agent message also said that it would use brainstorming,
+site-building, and verification skills. The session stopped before product
+implementation; no product file was created.
+
+## Pre-question autonomy
+
+This was the first critical area of the fifth test. The agent recognized that
+the request did not provide a firm identity, contacts, location, attorneys,
+results, or visual identity. It proposed safe-looking local placeholders and a
+fictional concept, including the provisional name `Aureum Legal`, but did not
+serialize those choices as assumptions.
+
+The agent then presented three reversible visual directions and asked for
+approval. The final question was:
+
+> Aprova esse design para eu escrever a especificação e implementar o site?
+
+The requested approval concerned a reversible local design direction. No real
+business fact, sensitive value, external authority, irreversible decision,
+regulated claim, or destructive action was required by the prompt. No
+`current-contract.json` existed before the question.
+
+- Decision classification before asking: `FAIL`
+- Non-blocking continuation: `FAIL`
+- Pre-question autonomy: `FAIL`
+- Question authorization: `FAIL`
+
+The agent's observable description that it considered real firm identity,
+contacts, and allegations blocking did not produce a persisted blocker or a
+contract, and the question actually asked for approval of a reversible design.
+
+## Contract-before-clarification
+
+The target had no `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` when the agent asked its
+question. Consequently there was no serialized `assumptions[]`, no
+`unresolvedDecisions[]`, and no contract fingerprint to inspect.
+
+- Contract creation: `FAIL`
+- Assumption serialization: `FAIL`
+- Contract-before-clarification: `FAIL`
+
+The agent described placeholders as reversible in its message, but prose is
+not serialized contract evidence and did not authorize the clarification stop.
+
+## Routing and gates
+
+The agent named the seven applicable guide IDs in its message, but it did not
+persist `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` or any files under `.forgeloop/gates/`.
+No deterministic route or gate artifact was available for independent
+inspection.
+
+- Deterministic routing: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Gate enforcement: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Preflight chronology
+
+The target contained no `.forgeloop/preflight.json` and no
+`.forgeloop/events.ndjson`. There was no `PREFLIGHT_READY`, `EXECUTION_STARTED`,
+task identity, route identity, contract fingerprint, or persisted assessment
+of unresolved blocking decisions.
+
+- Preflight chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+The required ordering could not be exercised because the agent stopped before
+contract persistence.
+
+## Implementation
+
+No product files were created. The target contains only files installed by
+ForgeLoop `init`; it has no HTML, CSS, JavaScript, or other product source
+files. The premium appearance, modern/sophisticated/trustworthy positioning,
+responsive mobile/desktop behavior, and contact form were therefore not
+exercised.
+
+- Implementation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Task success: `FAIL`
+
+## Lifecycle navigation
+
+The agent did not implement the product and did not execute `forgeloop next` as
+part of its session. The independent post-run `next --path <target> --json`
+inspection returned:
+
+```json
+{
+  "currentPhase": "RECEIVED",
+  "nextAction": "DISCOVER",
+  "terminal": false,
+  "reasonCodes": ["WORK_STATE_ABSENT"]
+}
+```
+
+- Agent lifecycle navigation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Execution → Verification handoff: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Implementation reconciliation: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Receipt preparation
+
+The agent never reached `VERIFYING`, did not run `prepare-completion`, and did
+not create an in-progress execution receipt.
+
+- Receipt preparation: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Real verification execution
+
+The agent executed no product checks. There was no syntax check, build,
+accessibility check, security check, performance check, responsive check, or
+contact-form check performed by the agent.
+
+- Verification execution: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Future-result fabrication prevention
+
+The agent stopped before a verification `next` response or any check
+requirement. No future result was serialized as `passed`, `OBSERVED`, exit code
+`0`, or equivalent fabricated evidence.
+
+- Future-result fabrication prevention: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+This capability was not exercised; absence of fabricated evidence is not a
+successful verification run.
+
+## Evidence chronology
+
+There was no `record-check` invocation and no `VERIFICATION_RECORDED` event.
+There is therefore no real-command → real-result → record-check chronology to
+validate.
+
+- Evidence chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Evidence serialization
+
+The target has no `work-state.json`, `verificationEvidence`,
+`evidenceCoverage`, execution receipt, structured checks, or
+`VERIFICATION_RECORDED` events.
+
+- Evidence serialization: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Evidence integrity: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Failure loop
+
+No project check failed because no project check ran. The observed failure was
+a pre-contract clarification stop, not a verification failure.
+
+- Failure loop: `NOT_EXERCISED`
+
+## Review transition
+
+The agent did not reach verification or review, and no evidence coverage was
+available to authorize `ENTER_REVIEWING`.
+
+- Review transition: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Completion
+
+The agent did not run `forgeloop complete` and did not produce a
+validator-backed completion. The independent command returned `REJECTED`.
+
+- Completion validation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Lifecycle closure: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## False-completion prevention
+
+The independent validator rejected completion rather than accepting the
+incomplete target. The observed rejection included:
+
+- `E_CONTRACT_MISSING`;
+- `E_RECEIPT_MISSING`;
+- `E_ROUTE_MISSING`;
+- `E_STATE_MISSING`.
+
+`validate-protocol` independently returned `INVALID` because the route, state,
+and receipt artifacts were missing.
+
+- False-completion prevention: `PASS`
+
+## Chronology
+
+The persisted event ledger was absent, so the required protocol sequence was
+never recorded.
+
+| Seq | Event | Timestamp | Task ID |
+| ---: | --- | --- | --- |
+| — | No `events.ndjson` persisted | — | — |
+
+The following required events were absent: `TASK_RECEIVED`,
+`CONTRACT_VALIDATED`, `ROUTE_VALIDATED`, `GATE_SATISFIED`, `PREFLIGHT_READY`,
+`EXECUTION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_RECORDED`, and
+`COMPLETION_VALIDATED`. Hash-chain validity: `NOT_VERIFIED` because no ledger
+was created.
+
+## Artifact evidence
+
+| Artifact | Observation |
+| --- | --- |
+| `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/preflight.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
+| Structured checks/evidence | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present; package version `0.1.4` |
+| Product implementation | No product files |
+
+The installed package and CLI were independently verified before the agent
+started:
+
+- installed package version: `0.1.4`;
+- CLI version: `0.1.4`;
+- target initialization: completed through the published CLI;
+- local tarball SHA-1: `966506b18dbb797949e397f39ba987dff7077283`;
+- registry tarball SHA-1 source: matching npm tarball;
+- local SHA-512 integrity: matching the registry integrity value.
+
+Independent validator commands, all run against the disposable target after
+the agent exited:
+
+- `forgeloop next --path <target> --json`: exit `0`, phase `RECEIVED`, next
+  action `DISCOVER`, reason `WORK_STATE_ABSENT`.
+- `forgeloop audit --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `INVALID`, with
+  missing contract, receipt, route, and state artifacts.
+- `forgeloop validate-protocol --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status
+  `INVALID`, with missing receipt, route, and state artifacts.
+- `forgeloop complete --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, status `REJECTED`,
+  task status `INCOMPLETE`, verification status `invalid`.
+
+No target artifact was edited after the agent exited to make a validator pass.
+
+## Capability results
+
+| Capability | Result |
+| --- | --- |
+| Experiment isolation | `PASS` |
+| Blind prompt purity | `PASS` |
+| Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
+| Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
+| Decision classification before asking | `FAIL` |
+| Non-blocking continuation | `FAIL` |
+| Pre-question autonomy | `FAIL` |
+| Contract creation | `FAIL` |
+| Assumption serialization | `FAIL` |
+| Contract-before-clarification | `FAIL` |
+| Question authorization | `FAIL` |
+| Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Implementation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Agent lifecycle navigation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Execution → Verification handoff | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Receipt preparation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Future-result fabrication prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence integrity | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Failure loop | `NOT_EXERCISED` |
+| Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Completion validation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
+| Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
+
+## Independent outcome dimensions
+
+- Task success: `FAIL`
+- Protocol conformance: `PARTIAL`
+- Verification validity: `INVALID`
+- Publication: `NOT_PUBLISHED` for the target deliverable; the ForgeLoop
+  package used by the experiment was already `PUBLISHED` as `0.1.4`.
+- Production readiness: `NOT_VERIFIED`
+
+## Final classification
+
+`PARTIAL`
+
+The run verified single-agent isolation, blind prompt purity, automatic
+bootstrap, instruction discovery, and validator rejection of false
+completion. It did not reach protocol execution because the agent requested
+approval for a reversible local design direction before persisting
+`current-contract.json` and recording the choice in `assumptions[]`.
+
+The first divergence was the approval question before contract creation. The
+last capability passed before that divergence was instruction discovery. The
+last valid persisted artifact was the npm-installed `.forgeloop/manifest.json`;
+no protocol event was validly persisted. The first capability not reached was
+contract-backed protocol preparation, beginning with contract creation and
+deterministic routing. The smallest failure class is `CONTRACT_FAILURE`.
+
+EVIDENCE
+→ CLASSIFICATION
+→ SMALLEST FAILURE CLASS

package/conformance/runs/2026-08-13-codex-fourth-live.md

@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+# ForgeLoop Fourth Blind Live Conformance Run
+
+This record documents the fourth blind live conformance experiment. The target
+was disposable and was not populated from the ForgeLoop working tree. The
+experiment used the published npm package and stopped when the blind agent
+asked a non-blocking product clarification question.
+
+## Environment
+
+- ForgeLoop release source commit: `99b56d7119098ce3637506f692c9d821e03eb8b1`
+- Approved merged `main` commit: `8d4296814ccc2d9a3d1aef3f6e7ad7219dfe0446`
+- Published-scope tree comparison: same between the release source commit and
+  approved merged `main`
+- ForgeLoop package version: `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.3`
+- npm tarball URL: `https://registry.npmjs.org/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/-/forgeloop-0.1.3.tgz`
+- Tarball SHA-1: `fb509e0da3f6f302c5342559f36c0e2c101fa6ce`
+- npm integrity SHA-512:
+  `sha512-iTrZ2UC5w5sSOQlSD61ACmVEsIdjzGUDZUaCohdmnIQ2NsfN60+tKHNxetAl6Gl7Dlq+QTHiPy8oocaSsOQ90Q==`
+- Agent: Codex CLI non-interactive agent
+- Model: not exposed by the harness
+- Harness: `codex-cli 0.146.0`, `codex exec`
+- Execution topology: `single-agent`
+- Agent process count: `1` primary process
+- Subagents enabled: `NO`
+- Delegation used: `NO`
+- Parallel agents: `NO`
+- Operating system: macOS `26.6.1` (`25G76`), `arm64`
+- Date/time: `2026-08-13T08:16:19-03:00` registration; agent started at
+  `2026-08-13T08:16:55-03:00`
+- Target path: `/Users/cassio/Documents/github/forgeloop-fourth-blind-live.DI06PF`
+- Conformance mode: Standard
+
+Installation procedure:
+
+1. Created the target as a new empty directory and confirmed zero entries.
+2. Fetched `@cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.3` from npm with `npm pack` outside the
+   target and verified the SHA-1 and SHA-512 values above.
+3. Installed the exact published package in a temporary external runtime with
+   `npm install --prefix <runtime> --no-save --ignore-scripts
+   @cassiomc1/forgeloop@0.1.3`.
+4. Confirmed the installed package and CLI both reported version `0.1.3`.
+5. Ran the installed CLI's normal initialization command:
+   `node <runtime>/node_modules/@cassiomc1/forgeloop/src/cli.js init --path <target>`.
+
+The initial `npx` binary form was rejected by npm 11 in this environment with
+`forgeloop: command not found`; this was diagnosed before the agent started.
+The external-runtime npm installation preserved the published package boundary
+and did not copy any ForgeLoop source checkout into the target.
+
+The agent received only this product request:
+
+```text
+Create a premium website for a law firm.
+
+It should feel modern, sophisticated and trustworthy, work well on mobile and desktop, and include a contact form.
+```
+
+No ForgeLoop, Loop Engineering, contract, routing, gate, preflight, lifecycle,
+verification, evidence, receipt, audit, completion, `forgeloop next`, or
+continuation instruction was added to the prompt.
+
+## Blind bootstrap and instruction discovery
+
+The initialized target contained the published adapter and canonical files,
+including `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/project-loop.mdc`, and the
+shared loop documents. The blind agent's first observable message stated that
+it was using the project's required workflow and would inspect the local rules.
+Its first command read `LOOP_ENGINEERING.md`, `PROJECT_PROFILE.md`,
+`GUIDE_ROUTER.md`, and the available agent skill instructions. This is evidence
+of automatic instruction discovery without ForgeLoop coaching in the prompt.
+
+- Blind bootstrap: `PASS`
+- Instruction discovery: `PASS`
+- Protocol initialization before implementation: `NOT_REACHED`; no product
+  implementation began.
+
+## Pre-contract autonomy
+
+The agent asked:
+
+> What kind of law firm should the site represent?
+>
+> 1. Corporate and commercial law
+> 2. Litigation and dispute resolution
+> 3. Full-service private client firm
+
+It recommended corporate and commercial. The request did not require a real
+firm identity or legal-business fact, so this was a reversible, non-blocking
+choice. The agent did not select a local fictional identity autonomously and
+did not serialize an assumption in `current-contract.assumptions[]`.
+
+- Absence of real brand treated as non-blocking: `FAIL`
+- Fictional/local identity chosen without interruption: `FAIL`
+- Required assumption fields observed: `FAIL` — contract was never created
+- Reversible assumptions not presented as facts: `NOT_REACHED`
+- `unresolvedDecisions[]` empty for reversible choices: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Pre-contract autonomy: `FAIL`
+
+## Contract, routing and gates
+
+The target had no `.forgeloop/current-contract.json`,
+`.forgeloop/routing-result.json`, or `.forgeloop/gates/` after the agent
+stopped.
+
+- Contract creation: `FAIL`
+- Deterministic routing: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Gate enforcement: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Preflight chronology
+
+No `.forgeloop/preflight.json` or `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` was created. There
+was no `PREFLIGHT_READY`, `EXECUTION_STARTED`, task identity, or route identity
+to compare.
+
+- Preflight `READY`: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Blockers absent: `NOT_REACHED`
+- `PREFLIGHT_READY` before `EXECUTION_STARTED`: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Preflight chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Implementation
+
+No product files were created. The target contains only the package-installed
+instruction, guide, schema, license, and manifest files. Therefore the
+premium, modern, sophisticated, trustworthy, responsive, and contact-form
+requirements were not exercised.
+
+- Implementation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Product task outcome: `FAIL`
+
+## Lifecycle navigation
+
+The agent did not reach implementation and did not execute `forgeloop next`.
+The independent post-run `next` inspection reported:
+
+```json
+{
+  "currentPhase": "RECEIVED",
+  "nextAction": "DISCOVER",
+  "terminal": false,
+  "reasonCodes": ["WORK_STATE_ABSENT"]
+}
+```
+
+- Agent lifecycle navigation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Execution → Verification handoff: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Expected `EXECUTING → forgeloop next → VERIFYING` sequence: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Implementation step reconciliation: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Receipt preparation
+
+The agent never reached `VERIFYING`, did not query `forgeloop next` in that
+phase, and did not run `prepare-completion`. No in-progress receipt or
+fingerprint set exists.
+
+- Receipt preparation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Receipt generation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Receipt treated as non-completion: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Receipt fingerprint consistency: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Real verification execution
+
+The agent executed no project tests, syntax checks, build, accessibility,
+security, performance, or visual checks. No check appears in a contract,
+receipt, or evidence ledger because none of those artifacts exists.
+
+- Verification execution: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Evidence chronology
+
+There was no `record-check`, no structured check, and no `VERIFICATION_RECORDED`
+event. Consequently, no result can be misclassified as observed evidence in
+this run, but the future-result behavior was not exercised.
+
+- Future-result fabrication prevention: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Evidence chronology: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Evidence serialization
+
+The target has no `work-state.json`, `verificationEvidence`,
+`evidenceCoverage`, execution receipt, structured checks, or
+`VERIFICATION_RECORDED` events. Required coverage was not produced.
+
+- Evidence serialization: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Evidence integrity: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Failure loop
+
+No project check ran and no verification failure entered the ForgeLoop failure
+loop. The observed failure was a pre-contract clarification stop.
+
+- Failure loop: `NOT_EXERCISED`
+
+## Review transition
+
+The agent did not reach verification or review, and no valid coverage existed
+that could authorize `ENTER_REVIEWING`.
+
+- Review transition: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## Completion
+
+The agent did not reach `REVIEWING`, did not run `forgeloop next` for
+`RUN_COMPLETE`, and did not produce a validator-backed completion. The
+independent `complete --path <target> --json` command returned `REJECTED` with
+missing contract, route, receipt, and work-state artifacts.
+
+- Receipt generation: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Completion validation by the agent: `NOT_REACHED`
+- Lifecycle closure: `NOT_REACHED`
+
+## False-completion prevention
+
+The validator rejected completion rather than accepting an incomplete target.
+Observed rejection codes included `E_CONTRACT_MISSING`, `E_RECEIPT_MISSING`,
+`E_ROUTE_MISSING`, and `E_STATE_MISSING`. `validate-protocol` also returned
+`INVALID` with missing route, state, and receipt artifacts.
+
+- False-completion prevention: `PASS`
+
+## Chronology
+
+The persisted event ledger was absent, so the required protocol event sequence
+was never recorded.
+
+| Sequence | Event | Timestamp | Task ID |
+| ---: | --- | --- | --- |
+| — | No `events.ndjson` persisted | — | — |
+
+The following required events were absent: `TASK_RECEIVED`,
+`CONTRACT_VALIDATED`, `ROUTE_VALIDATED`, `GATE_SATISFIED`, `PREFLIGHT_READY`,
+`EXECUTION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_STARTED`, `VERIFICATION_RECORDED`, and
+`COMPLETION_VALIDATED`. Hash-chain validity: `NOT_VERIFIED` because no ledger
+was created.
+
+## Artifact evidence
+
+| Artifact | Observation |
+| --- | --- |
+| `.forgeloop/current-contract.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/routing-result.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/gates/` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/preflight.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/work-state.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/events.ndjson` | Missing |
+| Structured checks/evidence | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/execution-receipt.json` | Missing |
+| `.forgeloop/manifest.json` | Present; package version `0.1.3` |
+| Product implementation | No product files |
+
+Independent validator commands, all run against the disposable target using
+the installed `0.1.3` CLI:
+
+- `forgeloop next --path <target> --json`: exit `0`, `RECEIVED`,
+  `WORK_STATE_ABSENT`, next action `DISCOVER`.
+- `forgeloop audit --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, `INVALID`.
+- `forgeloop validate-protocol --path <target> --route-file
+  .forgeloop/routing-result.json --state-file .forgeloop/work-state.json
+  --receipt-file .forgeloop/execution-receipt.json --contract-file
+  .forgeloop/current-contract.json --json`: exit `1`, `INVALID`.
+- `forgeloop complete --path <target> --json`: exit `1`, `REJECTED`.
+
+No artifacts were edited manually to make the test pass.
+
+## Capability results
+
+| Capability | Result |
+| --- | --- |
+| Blind bootstrap | `PASS` |
+| Instruction discovery | `PASS` |
+| Pre-contract autonomy | `FAIL` |
+| Contract creation | `FAIL` |
+| Deterministic routing | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Gate enforcement | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Preflight chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Implementation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Agent lifecycle navigation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Execution → Verification handoff | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Receipt preparation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Verification execution | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Future-result fabrication prevention | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence chronology | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence serialization | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Evidence integrity | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Failure loop | `NOT_EXERCISED` |
+| Review transition | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Receipt generation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Completion validation | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| Lifecycle closure | `NOT_REACHED` |
+| False-completion prevention | `PASS` |
+| Full conformance | `PARTIAL` |
+
+## Independent outcome dimensions
+
+- Task success: `FAIL`
+- Protocol conformance: `PARTIAL`
+- Verification validity: `INVALID`
+- Publication: `NOT_PUBLISHED` for the target deliverable; the ForgeLoop
+  package itself was already `PUBLISHED` as `0.1.3`.
+- Production readiness: `NOT_VERIFIED`
+
+## Final classification
+
+`PARTIAL`
+
+The run verified blind adapter bootstrap and instruction discovery and showed
+that the validators reject false completion. It did not reach protocol
+execution because the agent treated a reversible law-firm positioning choice as
+a blocking clarification instead of recording an agent-default assumption and
+continuing autonomously.

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@cassiomc1/forgeloop",
-  "version": "0.1.3",
+  "version": "0.1.5",
   "description": "Portable, verifiable instruction kit for AI agents and developers",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",