@c4a/context-cli 0.6.1 → 0.6.3

package/plugins/codex/skills/init/references/internal-procedures/skill-continue-workflow.md

@@ -1,235 +0,0 @@
----
-name: skill-continue-workflow
-description: >
-  Internal procedure invoked by the public Context continuation entry; not a user slash command.
-  Runs the status-driven Context process, executes safe mechanical next steps,
-  and delegates human gates to source, review, and package procedures.
-tools:
-  - Bash
----
-
-# skill-continue-workflow
-
-Continue an existing Context workspace from its current state.
-
-## TL;DR
-
-- Use this only inside an initialized Context workspace. If the user is starting
-  a new knowledge workspace or a new batch from a raw project/repo root, do not
-  run `context status` first; use the init workflow and complete setup before
-  returning here.
-- If `context status` reports `workspace-not-found` with a configured
-  `context.workspaceDir`, stop. If the directory exists, enter it and rerun
-  status. If it does not exist, ask whether to initialize it through the init
-  workflow; do not treat the host repository root as the workspace.
-- There is no `context continue` CLI command. Start with `context status`.
-- `context status` and CLI diagnostics are the source of truth.
-- If the user explicitly authorizes fully managed operation in the current
-  conversation, start and continue that loop with `context status --managed
-  --format json`, then execute its managed `command_plan`. This authority is
-  conversation-only: do not write it into `defineProject`, project files, or
-  reuse it in a later conversation.
-- Inspect `declarationGraph` and `configurationGaps`. Before structure
-  confirmation they are configuration warnings; after confirmation, a missing
-  compile route is a hard gate. Never substitute a compile phase from another
-  collection.
-- Treat `unclassifiedDocumentTargets`, `pendingStructureTargets`, and nonterminal
-  `structureBatch.slots` as unfinished workspace work even when the
-  current approved package is ready. A build closes only the active snapshots;
-  it does not prevent a later captured source from entering its own structure
-  round.
-- Confirm structure per canonical source + collection slot, but batch Review
-  across the declared round. When candidates exist and
-  `pendingStructureTargets` is non-empty, follow the pending align route before
-  opening Review; deterministic close later merges every active slot.
-- Execute safe mechanical `next:` steps; stop at semantic choices and human
-  gates.
-- Delegate source/scope decisions to
-  `skill-source-scope.md`.
-- Delegate review to `skill-review-gate.md`.
-- Delegate package output choices to
-  `skill-package-output.md`.
-- Delegate document investigation and structure confirmation to
-  `skill-prose-align.md`.
-- Delegate source-bound prose compile requests to
-  `skill-prose-compile.md`.
-- Do not inspect `.tmp`, `unapproved/`, `knowledge/`, `dist/`, or
-  `node_modules/@c4a/context/dist` with ad hoc scripts to decide project state.
-- Only run commands surfaced by the current status route, current phase view,
-  review gate, verify/build gate, or package guidance. Do not invent alternate
-  lifecycle commands from memory.
-
-<reference>
-
-## Safe Mechanical Commands
-
-These can run when already implied by current status and no placeholder/human
-choice remains:
-
-| State / hint | Allowed action |
-|---|---|
-| source already declared | `context source ensure`, `context source list`, `context source get` |
-| declared phase that does not read new source body or require a semantic choice | `context run <phase-id>` |
-| prose align evidence read | `context run align:<type>:<source>:<collection> --view <view>` |
-| prose structure validation | `context run align:<type>:<source>:<collection> --validate --input <structure.yaml>` |
-| prose compile evidence read | `context run compile:<type>:<source>:<collection> --view <view>` |
-| prose compile action validation | `context run compile:<type>:<source>:<collection> --validate --input <compile-actions.yaml>` |
-| copied review payload supplied by user | `context review apply <payload-file>` |
-| close required after review | `context close --format json` |
-| package already declared and close is clean | `context build` |
-| validation requested | `context verify` |
-
-Capture phases are not safe mechanical commands by default. `capture:file:*`
-and `capture:lark:*` read local or remote source bodies and update committed
-snapshots, so they require the source read-permission gate unless the current
-turn already contains explicit user confirmation for that exact source.
-An explicit request to capture, ingest, fetch, read, or include the exact
-file/Lark path or URL is that confirmation; do not ask again after registration.
-Mere mention, source discussion, or a register-only request is not confirmation,
-and an explicit refusal always overrides inferred permission.
-
-## Human Gates
-
-In ordinary mode, follow every gate below. In explicit current-conversation
-managed mode, the CLI may resolve classification, extraction scope, structure
-confirmation, Review, and package-output choices without pausing. It still
-must not infer a source boundary, read an unapproved source body, perform an
-external repository/system operation, or bypass validation/verify errors.
-
-Stop and ask, or wait for user input, for:
-
-- `Human gate:` in CLI output.
-- placeholders such as `<name>`, `<repo-or-subdir>`, `<phase-id>`, `<collection>`.
-- missing source selection.
-- source boundary/name decisions, because they affect `knowledge/` paths and
-  `source_ref` prefixes.
-- source repo operations: clone, checkout, reset, fetch, install, build, test.
-- source scope, package/subdirectory, symbol group, or glob choices.
-- file/Lark capture or refresh, including capture preview, until the user has
-  confirmed which local path or remote document may be read.
-- review approval/rejection decisions.
-- document structure confirmation, section ownership, edge confirmation,
-  rewrite intent, conflict, weak-evidence, or cross-document organization
-  choices unless they are being handled through prose align/compile evidence
-  views and validation.
-- package output type or template choices.
-
-When a human gate has a fixed small option set, use the host's native
-multi-choice tool when available (Claude Code `AskUserQuestion`, Codex's
-available native user-input tool such as `request_user_input` when exposed,
-Cursor Plan Mode `AskQuestion`). If unavailable, fall back to Markdown `A/B/C`
-choices. Each option must include the effect of choosing it.
-
-</reference>
-
-<procedures>
-
-### Step 0 — Confirm Workspace Exists
-
-If the current task is to create a new Context workspace, or the user has not
-identified an initialized Context workspace root for this turn, do not continue
-with this workflow. Initialize through the public Context init entry or
-`context init` first, run the setup command printed by init, then return to this workflow from the
-created workspace.
-
-### Step 1 — Read Status
-
-Run:
-
-```bash
-context status
-```
-
-Use `context status --managed --format json` instead only when the current
-conversation explicitly contains fully managed authorization. Keep `--managed`
-on commands returned by that status loop; otherwise never add it.
-
-Use the output as evidence. Explain status and next step in the user's language;
-do not forward a long raw transcript unless requested.
-
-### Step 2 — Route The State
-
-1. If status says `missing-source`, `needs-capture-phase`, `needs-capture`,
-   `needs-extract-phase`, or `ready-to-extract`,
-   source boundary/name is unclear, source scope is unclear, or an extract
-   phase needs first-run scope confirmation, follow
-   `skill-source-scope.md`.
-   When `routing.configuration` is present, make only that declared project
-   configuration change and rerun status. Otherwise follow
-   `routing.command_plan`: run `immediate` items directly and wait for current-
-   conversation confirmation before `after-human-confirmation` items.
-   For mixed sources, status intentionally returns `ready-to-extract` before
-   `captured-ready-to-investigate` while all document snapshots are captured,
-   document structure is untouched, and code extraction is missing, pending,
-   or stale. Explain that code is processed first, then follow the exact
-   extraction preview/rerun command.
-2. If status says `captured-ready-to-classify`, run every immediate
-   collection-neutral investigation command, summarize evidence across all
-   targets, and ask the user to confirm the proposed mainline collection(s)
-   before editing `src/index.ts`. If status says `needs-prose-configuration`, apply only the generic
-   `routing.configuration` change in `src/index.ts`, rerun status, and do not
-   create a new workspace. If status says `captured-ready-to-investigate` or `needs-structure`, or the
-   user asks to split, merge, classify, relate, or semantically organize
-   document evidence before draft pages exist, follow
-   `skill-prose-align.md`.
-3. If status says `needs-prose-compile` or `structure-ready`, or the user asks
-   to turn confirmed structure into source-bound draft pages, follow
-   `skill-prose-compile.md`.
-4. If the latest phase result has `next_action.human_gate=false`, follow its
-   command and do not invent a Review gate. This includes
-   `continue_compile_batch` and `continue-codegraph-batch`: finish the whole
-   prepared round first. If status says
-   `compile-ready-for-review`, or the latest result has
-   `next_action.human_gate=true`, follow
-   `skill-review-gate.md`.
-5. If status says `compile-close-needed`, run `context close --format json`
-   unless CLI diagnostics require human repair, then return to **Step 1**.
-6. If status says `ready-to-build`, `built`, `needs-package-output`, or approved knowledge exists but
-   package output is not chosen or declared,
-   follow `skill-package-output.md`.
-   `built` is terminal only when both `unclassifiedDocumentTargets` and
-   `pendingStructureTargets` are empty. Use `structureBatch` for the complete
-   multi-source round: evidence Views are parallel-safe; stage, confirm, Review
-   apply, and close mutations are serial.
-7. If the next command is safe per [Safe Mechanical Commands](#safe-mechanical-commands),
-   run it and return to **Step 1**.
-8. If the next command crosses a [Human Gate](#human-gates), ask or wait; do not
-   guess.
-
-### Step 3 — Execute Safely
-
-Before editing `src/index.ts` or package templates, read:
-
-```text
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/guides/agent-guide.md
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/guides/package-outputs.md
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/reference/project-api.md
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/reference/package-templates.md
-```
-
-Do not write one-off scripts to parse source packages, count extracted symbols,
-or sample candidates. Use `context source inspect` and the extract no-write
-preview command.
-
-### Step 4 — Report
-
-Report only the meaningful state transition: commands run, current status,
-human gate reached, and the precise user decision needed next. Never present
-`context build`, `context verify`, or file counts as proof that a deliverable is
-usable; inspect generated package structure when package output is involved.
-
-### Step 5 — Self-verify Checklist
-
-- [ ] `context status` (or explicitly authorized `context status --managed`) was
-  run first. If not, return to **Step 1**.
-- [ ] No human gate was crossed without either direct user confirmation or the
-  current conversation's managed authorization. If not, stop and report the
-  protocol error.
-- [ ] No ad hoc file/script probing replaced CLI views. If not, discard that
-  conclusion and use the CLI view.
-
-</procedures>
-If top-level `state`, `next`, or `routing.command_plan` contradicts
-`draftCandidates`, `pendingReview`, `close.state`, package freshness, or verify
-counts, stop instead of rerunning a completed phase. Report
-`status-route-conflict` and preserve the detailed status output for diagnosis.

package/plugins/codex/skills/init/references/internal-procedures/skill-init-workspace.md

@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
----
-name: skill-init-workspace
-description: >
-  Internal procedure invoked by the public Context init entry; not a user slash command.
-  Initializes a Context knowledge workspace, executes only safe setup follow-up,
-  then hands off to the next-step workflow until the first human gate.
-tools:
-  - Bash
----
-
-# skill-init-workspace
-
-Initialize a Context workspace. The CLI creates files; the agent follows safe
-setup hints and stops before source/scope choices.
-
-## TL;DR
-
-- Use `context init`; do not add any extra project-local agent setup.
-- If init prints the standard setup `next:` command, run it instead of only
-  repeating it.
-- After the setup command succeeds, enter the workspace and read `AGENTS.md`
-  before running `context status`.
-- After setup, use `skill-continue-workflow.md`
-  for status-driven continuation.
-- Stop at source registration, extraction scope, review, package output, or any
-  external repo operation that needs user choice.
-- Explain in the user's conversation language. Keep CLI commands, flags, paths,
-  status values, JSONL keys, and copied CLI tokens unchanged.
-
-<procedures>
-
-### Step 1 — Run Init
-
-1. If the user gave no directory, run `context init`.
-2. If the user gave a directory, run `context init <project-dir>`.
-3. If the user supplied a project name option, pass it as `--name <name>`.
-4. Read the CLI feedback block and preserve the project root path.
-
-### Step 2 — Execute Safe Setup
-
-1. If CLI prints `next: cd "<project-root>" && bun install`,
-   execute that command.
-2. If install fails, report the failure and stop.
-3. If setup succeeds, read `<project-root>/AGENTS.md`.
-4. After reading `AGENTS.md`, run `context status` from `<project-root>` and
-   treat that output as the current workspace state.
-
-### Step 3 — Handoff Or Stop
-
-1. If status is ready for a safe mechanical step, continue with
-   `skill-continue-workflow.md`.
-2. If status is `missing-source`, `Human gate:`, or contains placeholders such as
-   `<name>`, `<repo-or-subdir>`, `<phase-id>`, or `<collection>`, ask for the
-   missing human choice and stop. For missing sources, ask for the knowledge
-   source boundary first; do not ask for a raw source name as an isolated
-   parameter.
-3. Do not infer repo source, source boundary, source name, package, or
-   extraction scope from cwd, parent directories, package names, monorepo
-   layout, or git remote.
-
-### Step 4 — Report
-
-Summarize what was initialized, what setup command ran, current status, and the
-human choice needed next. Do not paste a long raw CLI transcript unless the user
-asks for exact output.
-
-### Step 5 — Self-verify Checklist
-
-- [ ] Safe setup was executed when CLI provided the standard setup `next:`. If
-  not, return to **Step 2**.
-- [ ] No repo source or extraction scope was inferred. If not, stop and ask the
-  user to confirm the source boundary and scope.
-
-</procedures>

package/plugins/codex/skills/init/references/internal-procedures/skill-package-output.md

@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
----
-name: skill-package-output
-description: >
-  Internal procedure invoked by the public Context continuation entry; not a user slash command.
-  Explains package output choices, prefers kb packages, declares selected
-  package builders, builds, and inspects generated package structure.
-tools:
-  - Bash
----
-
-# skill-package-output
-
-Choose and build a package output from approved knowledge.
-
-## TL;DR
-
-- Package output is a human choice. Do not add package builders just because an
-  example exists.
-- In explicitly authorized current-conversation fully managed mode, resolve
-  this choice from the user's stated deliverable: use an agent knowledge-base
-  package for an Agent-facing knowledge workspace, an LLM text bundle only
-  when a text/RAG bundle was requested, and skip only when the user asked to
-  keep approved Markdown without a package. Do not persist this preference.
-- Recommend an agent knowledge-base package first for agent consumption.
-- Present an LLM text bundle as an alternative for a single text/RAG import
-  bundle.
-- Do not use `kbPackage()` or `llmsPackage()` as user-facing option labels.
-  Mention those API names only after the user chooses an output shape.
-- Do not offer `both` as a shortcut. Add one output, build, inspect, then ask
-  before adding another.
-- Build happens after review and deterministic close. If status says
-  `compile-close-needed`, run `context close --format json` before build.
-- Package templates may customize navigation and query guidance, but coverage,
-  gap, scope, or known-limit claims must cite approved knowledge,
-  `knowledge/structure.yaml`, or `context-build-inventory.json`.
-- Generated package structure, not `context build` alone, proves usability.
-
-<reference>
-
-## Output Shapes
-
-Recommended first output:
-
-```text
-dist/<name>-kb/
-├── AGENTS.md
-├── skills/
-│   └── knowledge-query/
-│       └── SKILL.md
-└── wikis/
-    ├── index.md
-    ├── <group>/
-    │   ├── index.md
-    │   └── ...
-    └── ...
-```
-
-Alternative:
-
-```text
-dist/<name>-llms/
-└── llms.txt
-```
-
-</reference>
-
-<procedures>
-
-### Step 1 — Read Package Docs
-
-Before editing package declarations or templates, read:
-
-```text
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/guides/package-outputs.md
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/reference/package-templates.md
-```
-
-### Step 2 — Explain The Choice
-
-Explain in the user's conversation language:
-
-- an agent knowledge-base package creates copied approved knowledge pages and
-  reusable query guidance under `dist/<name>-kb/`;
-- the default `knowledge-query` skill teaches agents how to query and cite those
-  copied approved knowledge pages;
-- the kb template must keep `wikis/index.md` as the OKF bundle entry page;
-- the default `wikis/index.md` is intentionally shallow: it describes the
-  bundle and links to next-level directories;
-- `context build` maps internal production collections into OKF roots and
-  generates child directory indexes such as `<okf-root>/<group>/index.md`, so
-  users can browse from OKF root -> group -> page; `wikis/index.md` is the
-  required default OKF root entry, while selected `guides/`, `rules/`, or
-  `feats/` roots get their own indexes too;
-- the exact mapping is `codegraph`/`business`/`product` -> `wikis/`,
-  `architecture`/`sop`/`faq`/`decision`/`incident` -> `guides/`,
-  `standards`/`test` -> `rules/`, and `feats` -> `feats/`;
-- `wikis/` is the structured entity-and-relationship layer; guides and rules
-  may explain, operationalize, or constrain it, but co-location does not prove
-  a relationship;
-- an LLM text bundle creates one text/RAG import bundle under
-  `dist/<name>-llms/`;
-- the user can customize `src/package-templates/kb/` before build;
-- template variables and examples are documented in
-  `node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/reference/template-variables.md`;
-- build writes a package inventory such as `context-build-inventory.json`, which
-  templates may cite when describing package coverage. Its edge section reports
-  the structural edge contract and the evidence status from `context verify`;
-- the user can skip package output for now and keep only `knowledge/`.
-
-Outside managed mode, ask which single output to create first using the host's
-native multi-choice tool when available. Use semantic option labels:
-
-- Agent knowledge-base package: for agents to query and cite approved knowledge pages.
-- LLM text bundle: for one text/RAG import bundle.
-- Skip package output for now: keep approved Markdown only.
-
-### Step 3 — Declare The Selected Package
-
-After the user chooses, read the template variable guide if the template needs
-navigation changes:
-
-```text
-node_modules/@c4a/context/docs/reference/template-variables.md
-```
-
-Then edit `src/index.ts` and package templates according to the SDK docs. For
-kb output, prefer a clear package name such as `<source-name>-kb`.
-
-### Step 4 — Build And Inspect
-
-If status says close is required, run:
-
-```bash
-context close --format json
-```
-
-Do not build from unclosed approved knowledge.
-
-Run:
-
-```bash
-context build
-```
-
-Inspect the generated `dist/<name>-kb/` or `dist/<name>-llms/` structure against
-[Output Shapes](#output-shapes). For kb packages, inspect every selected
-OKF root that appears in `context-build-inventory.json`, not only
-`wikis/`.
-If templates are placeholders or knowledge pages are thin, say that plainly and
-stop for user direction.
-
-If build reports that a template path collides with copied knowledge, do not
-retry blindly. Explain that template files and selected knowledge cannot render
-to the same path, then rename the template file or ask whether to exclude that
-knowledge path.
-
-If build reports a template-boundary diagnostic, repair the template by
-referencing approved knowledge, `knowledge/structure.yaml`, or
-`context-build-inventory.json` for coverage/gap/scope/known-limit statements.
-Do not patch `dist/` as the durable fix; edit the template under
-`src/package-templates/`.
-
-### Step 5 — Self-verify Checklist
-
-- [ ] The user selected the package output, or explicit current-conversation
-  managed mode resolved it from the stated deliverable. If not, return to
-  **Step 2**.
-- [ ] Only one output was added first. If not, ask before continuing with more.
-- [ ] A kb package template contains `wikis/index.md` and at least one
-  `SKILL.md`.
-- [ ] For kb output, the generated OKF root indexes link to next-level
-  directories, and child directory indexes exist when selected knowledge has
-  subdirectories.
-- [ ] Template paths do not collide with copied knowledge paths.
-- [ ] Template coverage/gap/scope/known-limit claims cite approved knowledge,
-  `knowledge/structure.yaml`, or build inventory.
-- [ ] Generated structure was inspected after build. If not, return to
-  **Step 4**.
-
-</procedures>

package/plugins/codex/skills/init/references/internal-procedures/skill-prose-align/references/internal-procedures/structure-planning/references/candidate-resolution.md

@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
-# Candidate Resolution Rules
-
-Use these rules after reading the current align evidence views and before
-authoring `context.structure.v1`. They define how current anomaly diagnostics
-map to supported structure outcomes.
-
-## Anomaly Signals
-
-Anomaly diagnostics are mechanical warnings. Do not ignore them and do not treat
-them as recommendations.
-
-For each anomaly, choose one current outcome and record the reasoning in the
-structure payload or user-facing explanation:
-
-| Outcome | Use When |
-|---|---|
-| Accept the correction | The anomaly points to a real structure fix. Apply a concrete node, section, edge, or ownership correction supported by source refs. |
-| Dismiss with rationale | The warning is mechanically true but semantically harmless. Keep the structure and state why in the confirmation summary. |
-| Keep unresolved | The warning changes structure but source evidence is insufficient. Add an `unresolved[]` item instead of guessing. |
-
-Known anomaly kinds:
-
-| Kind | Meaning | Required handling |
-|---|---|---|
-| Missing evidence | A proposed node, section, or edge has no source-backed evidence. | Add source refs, remove it, or keep the issue unresolved. |
-| Structure churn | A node was renamed, split, merged, replaced, or rejected during investigation. | Confirm the final id/title/target with the user or keep the ambiguity unresolved. |
-| Duplicate evidence | The same source ref appears more than once for the same semantic role. | Deduplicate it or explain why the repeated ref supports different roles. |
-| Broad review needed | The CLI collapsed many anomalies or reports aggregate risk. | Review the affected structure broadly; do not finalize solely from ordering. |
-
-## Stable References
-
-Use stable `node_ref`, `view_ref`, and `section_ref` values from the current
-`context.structure.v1` payload for in-payload references. A NodeRef should be
-safe, lower-case, and path-shaped, such as `entity/rspack` or
-`domain/build-tooling`. `slug` and `path` are derived fields in the current
-flow; do not invent alternate reference aliases.
-
-When an edge or section points at knowledge:
-
-- use the schema ref that matches the target layer:
-  `node_ref` for a conceptual Node, `view_ref` for a collection view, and
-  `section_ref` for a planned section;
-- ensure the target NodeRef, ViewRef, or SectionRef exists in the current
-  structure or approved knowledge;
-- keep relation hints unresolved when the target does not exist;
-- follow CLI diagnostics if a ref is unknown or stale.
-
-Do not create alternate alias fields or non-schema candidate ledger fields.
-They are not part of the current structure contract.
-
-## Visible Labels And Audit Rationale
-
-Humans need to understand merge, reject, rename, and replacement choices
-without decoding temporary ids. Keep that discipline in the current structure
-flow through current fields:
-
-- use `title` and `summary` to name the final node in user-facing language;
-- explain renamed/split/merged candidates in the confirmation summary, not by
-  adding non-schema label fields;
-- when a relation or rename cannot be settled from evidence, put the visible
-  title/target clue in `unresolved[]`;
-- when asking the user, phrase the choice with business labels ("Rspack build
-  tool page" vs "Webpack page"), not with source refs or internal section ids.
-
-NodeRef is the stable conceptual identity. ViewRef is the collection-specific
-view identity and is the durable approved-page identity. SectionRef is the
-stable planned-section identity under a ViewRef. Package paths are derived from
-the approved ViewRef plus containment/slug; do not treat paths as an alternate
-identity contract. Visible labels help humans review the choice, but they do
-not authorize a different NodeRef, ViewRef, edge, or section ownership without
-source-backed evidence and user confirmation.
-
-## Duplicate And Conflict Handling
-
-- Exact duplicate structure -> keep one node/section/edge and explain the
-  duplicate in the confirmation summary.
-- Same topic but different evidence boundary -> keep separate sections only
-  when each section has a distinct source-backed role.
-- Conflicting facts -> ask the user or keep an `unresolved[]` item. Do not
-  pick a winner from title order or source order.
-- Replacement or rename -> ask the user when it changes NodeRef, ViewRef,
-  containment, slug, or the derived approved path. These are durable user-facing
-  identities, not disposable labels.
-
-## Self-verify
-
-- [ ] Every accepted node, section, and edge has source-backed support.
-- [ ] Every unresolved relation or conflict is explicit in `unresolved[]`.
-- [ ] No non-schema candidate ledger fields or alias fields appear in the payload.
-- [ ] NodeRef, ViewRef, and SectionRef values, not temporary labels or paths,
-  are used for current references.

package/plugins/codex/skills/init/references/internal-procedures/skill-prose-align/references/internal-procedures/structure-planning/references/density-profile.md

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# Evidence Density Selection
-
-Use density as a private reading and section-planning strategy. It is not a
-separate payload, not a quality score, and not a workflow stage. Persist only
-current `context.structure.v1` fields such as `nodes[]`, `sections[]`,
-`source_refs[]`, `edges[]`, and `unresolved[]`.
-
-Apply this reference when a captured source is long, dense, fragmented, or hard
-to split into stable planned sections. Use the current CLI evidence views
-(`read-plan`, `source-index`, `span-detail`, `span-text`) to inspect material;
-do not invent a separate coarse-read artifact.
-
-| Profile | Use When | Agent Behavior |
-|---|---|---|
-| `macro` | A long source has many headings, sections, or broad topic shifts. | Create section proposals around major headings and preserve document-level anchors so later passes do not flatten scope. |
-| `meso` | Default for normal product, design, or operational documents with several related sections. | Produce section proposals for meaningful local units and preserve evidence anchors. |
-| `micro` | The source is fragmented, note-like, or dense with short independent claims. | Keep section proposals narrow and avoid bundling unrelated blocks into one candidate. |
-| `single_pass` | The source is short enough that one read can safely discover all relevant structure. | Keep anchors minimal and avoid over-segmentation, but still validate the resulting structure. |
-
-Treat Markdown heading changes as section-planning hints, not hard boundaries.
-Sibling sub-headings under a shared parent can remain in one planned section
-when they form one coherent semantic topic for that parent. Headings with no
-shared parent should usually split unless you intentionally want one section to
-span them. When a dense source has many headings, split by heading first, then
-merge adjacent or sibling groups only when the merged section is still one
-coherent fact group.
-
-Do not let density alone choose `node_type`, `tags`, `section.kind`, or body
-content. Action/domain gates are decided from source evidence and the current
-schema, not from density metadata.