@browserbasehq/orca 3.5.1-preview.0 → 3.6.0-gemini-cua

package/dist/cjs/lib/v3/verifier/rubricVerifier.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1645 @@
+"use strict";
+Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
+exports.RubricVerifier = void 0;
+exports.resolveVerifierConfig = resolveVerifierConfig;
+const zod_1 = require("zod");
+const trajectory_js_1 = require("./trajectory.js");
+const index_js_1 = require("./prompts/index.js");
+const evidence_js_1 = require("./evidence.js");
+const errorTaxonomy_js_1 = require("./errorTaxonomy.js");
+const RubricItemSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    criterion: zod_1.z.string(),
+    description: zod_1.z.string(),
+    max_points: zod_1.z.number(),
+    condition: zod_1.z.string().optional(),
+    task_span: zod_1.z.string().optional(),
+    justification: zod_1.z.string().optional(),
+    earned_points: zod_1.z.union([zod_1.z.number(), zod_1.z.string()]).optional(),
+});
+const RubricSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    items: zod_1.z.array(RubricItemSchema),
+});
+const FindingSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    category: zod_1.z
+        .enum([
+        "agent_tool_usage",
+        "agent_strategy",
+        "rubric_quality",
+        "trajectory_capture",
+        "task_specification",
+        "verifier_uncertainty",
+        "other",
+    ])
+        .catch("other"),
+    severity: zod_1.z.enum(["info", "warning", "blocking"]).catch("info"),
+    description: zod_1.z.string(),
+    suggestedAction: zod_1.z.string().optional(),
+    relatedSteps: zod_1.z.array(zod_1.z.number()).optional(),
+});
+const FusedOutcomeSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    primary_intent: zod_1.z.string(),
+    reasoning: zod_1.z.string(),
+    output_success: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    findings: zod_1.z.array(FindingSchema).optional().default([]),
+});
+const FusedPerCriterionSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    criterion_idx: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int().min(0),
+    applicable_evidence: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+    justification: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+    earned_points: zod_1.z.coerce.number(),
+    evidence_sufficient: zod_1.z.boolean().optional().default(true),
+    condition_met: zod_1.z.boolean().nullable().optional(),
+});
+const FusedFailurePointSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    step_index: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int(),
+    error_code: zod_1.z.string(),
+    error_category: zod_1.z.string(),
+    description: zod_1.z.string(),
+});
+const FusedTaskValiditySchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    is_ambiguous: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    ambiguity_reason: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+    is_invalid: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    invalid_reason: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+});
+const FusedJudgmentResponseSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    outcome: FusedOutcomeSchema,
+    per_criterion: zod_1.z.array(FusedPerCriterionSchema),
+    failure_point: FusedFailurePointSchema.optional(),
+    task_validity: FusedTaskValiditySchema.optional(),
+});
+/** Outcome-only response: no per_criterion field, just outcome + diagnostics. */
+const FusedOutcomeResponseSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    outcome: FusedOutcomeSchema,
+    failure_point: FusedFailurePointSchema.optional(),
+    task_validity: FusedTaskValiditySchema.optional(),
+});
+const BatchedRelevanceItemSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    evidence_idx: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int().min(0),
+    scores: zod_1.z.array(zod_1.z.object({
+        criterion_idx: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int().min(0),
+        score: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int().min(0).max(10),
+    })),
+});
+const BatchedRelevanceResponseSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    items: zod_1.z.array(BatchedRelevanceItemSchema),
+});
+const PerCriterionScoreResponseSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    criterion_idx: zod_1.z.coerce.number().int().min(0),
+    applicable_evidence: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+    justification: zod_1.z.string().optional().default(""),
+    earned_points: zod_1.z.coerce.number(),
+    evidence_sufficient: zod_1.z.boolean().optional().default(true),
+    condition_met: zod_1.z.boolean().nullable().optional(),
+});
+const TaskValiditySchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    reasoning_is_ambiguous: zod_1.z.string(),
+    is_ambiguous: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    ambiguity_codes: zod_1.z.array(zod_1.z.string()).default([]),
+    reasoning_is_invalid: zod_1.z.string(),
+    is_invalid: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    invalid_task_codes: zod_1.z.array(zod_1.z.string()).default([]),
+});
+const FailurePointSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    step_numbers: zod_1.z.string(),
+    error_code: zod_1.z.string(),
+    error_category: zod_1.z.string(),
+    error_type: zod_1.z.string(),
+    what_happened: zod_1.z.string(),
+    agent_reasoning: zod_1.z.string(),
+    evidence: zod_1.z.string(),
+    impact: zod_1.z.string(),
+});
+const FailureAnalysisSchema = zod_1.z.object({
+    reasoning: zod_1.z.string(),
+    has_failure: zod_1.z.boolean(),
+    failure_points: zod_1.z.array(FailurePointSchema).default([]),
+});
+const noopLogger = () => { };
+const APPROX_CHARS_PER_TOKEN = 4;
+const DEFAULT_ACTION_HISTORY_TOKEN_BUDGET = 2_000;
+const DEFAULT_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET = 3_000;
+const DEFAULT_OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET = 4_000;
+const DEFAULT_OUTCOME_IMAGE_LIMIT = 3;
+const DEFAULT_MAX_PARALLEL = 8;
+const DEFAULT_TOP_K = 5;
+const DEFAULT_RELEVANCE_BATCH_SIZE = 4;
+const OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_MAX_STEPS = 14;
+const OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_STEP_CHARS = 900;
+/**
+ * How much of the final aria tree to include in the always-attached
+ * "Final trajectory state" block. The verifier needs to see the end-of-run
+ * page content reliably — the top-K/relevance selection can starve it out
+ * when the final probe doesn't textually match the task keywords. 20k chars
+ * (~5k tokens) is comfortably above typical page sizes while bounded.
+ */
+const FINAL_STATE_ARIA_CHARS = 20_000;
+const DEFAULT_APPROACH = "b";
+const DEFAULT_OPTIONAL_STEPS_MODE = "folded";
+const NO_TRUNC = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;
+function readPositiveIntEnv(env, name, fallback) {
+    const raw = env[name];
+    if (!raw)
+        return fallback;
+    const parsed = Number.parseInt(raw, 10);
+    return Number.isFinite(parsed) && parsed > 0 ? parsed : fallback;
+}
+function readChars(env, name, fallback, disabled) {
+    if (disabled)
+        return NO_TRUNC;
+    return readPositiveIntEnv(env, name, fallback);
+}
+function readApproach(env) {
+    const raw = env.VERIFIER_APPROACH;
+    if (raw === "a" || raw === "b" || raw === "outcome-only")
+        return raw;
+    return DEFAULT_APPROACH;
+}
+function readOptionalsMode(env) {
+    const raw = env.VERIFIER_OPTIONAL_STEPS;
+    if (raw === "folded" || raw === "separate" || raw === "skip")
+        return raw;
+    return DEFAULT_OPTIONAL_STEPS_MODE;
+}
+/**
+ * Resolve every verifier knob from env (+ optional overrides) into a frozen
+ * VerifierConfig. Called once by RubricVerifier's constructor; per-call
+ * overrides flow through verify()'s optional override arg.
+ *
+ * The master switch VERIFIER_DISABLE_TRUNCATION=1 lifts every per-section
+ * limit to MAX_SAFE_INTEGER — useful on high-context models where
+ * evidence-bound truncation is the bottleneck, not the token budget.
+ */
+function resolveVerifierConfig(env = process.env, overrides = {}) {
+    const truncDisabled = overrides.truncation?.disabled ?? env.VERIFIER_DISABLE_TRUNCATION === "1";
+    return {
+        approach: overrides.approach ?? readApproach(env),
+        optionalSteps: overrides.optionalSteps ?? readOptionalsMode(env),
+        topK: overrides.topK ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_TOP_K", DEFAULT_TOP_K),
+        relevanceBatchSize: overrides.relevanceBatchSize ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_RELEVANCE_BATCH_SIZE", DEFAULT_RELEVANCE_BATCH_SIZE),
+        outcomeMaxImages: overrides.outcomeMaxImages ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_OUTCOME_MAX_IMAGES", DEFAULT_OUTCOME_IMAGE_LIMIT),
+        maxParallel: overrides.maxParallel ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_MAX_PARALLEL", DEFAULT_MAX_PARALLEL),
+        evidenceTokenBudget: overrides.evidenceTokenBudget ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET", DEFAULT_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET),
+        outcomeEvidenceTokenBudget: overrides.outcomeEvidenceTokenBudget ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET", DEFAULT_OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_TOKEN_BUDGET),
+        actionHistoryTokenBudget: overrides.actionHistoryTokenBudget ??
+            readPositiveIntEnv(env, "VERIFIER_ACTION_HISTORY_TOKEN_BUDGET", DEFAULT_ACTION_HISTORY_TOKEN_BUDGET),
+        truncation: {
+            disabled: truncDisabled,
+            evidenceTextPreview: overrides.truncation?.evidenceTextPreview ??
+                readChars(env, "VERIFIER_EVIDENCE_TEXT_PREVIEW_CHARS", 200, truncDisabled),
+            groupedEvidenceText: overrides.truncation?.groupedEvidenceText ??
+                readChars(env, "VERIFIER_GROUPED_EVIDENCE_TEXT_CHARS", 600, truncDisabled),
+            buildEvidenceText: overrides.truncation?.buildEvidenceText ??
+                readChars(env, "VERIFIER_BUILD_EVIDENCE_TEXT_CHARS", 160, truncDisabled),
+            buildEvidenceAria: overrides.truncation?.buildEvidenceAria ??
+                readChars(env, "VERIFIER_BUILD_EVIDENCE_ARIA_CHARS", 1200, truncDisabled),
+            actionHistoryReasoning: overrides.truncation?.actionHistoryReasoning ??
+                readChars(env, "VERIFIER_ACTION_HISTORY_REASONING_CHARS", 140, truncDisabled),
+        },
+    };
+}
+function mergeConfig(base, overrides) {
+    if (!overrides)
+        return base;
+    return {
+        ...base,
+        ...overrides,
+        truncation: { ...base.truncation, ...(overrides.truncation ?? {}) },
+    };
+}
+/** Top-K grouping per criterion. Pure compute. */
+function groupTopKByCriterion(args) {
+    const { numCriteria, relevanceScores, topK } = args;
+    const grouped = new Map();
+    for (let cIdx = 0; cIdx < numCriteria; cIdx++) {
+        const scored = [];
+        for (const [eIdx, scoreMap] of relevanceScores.entries()) {
+            scored.push({ eIdx, score: scoreMap.get(cIdx) ?? 0 });
+        }
+        scored.sort((a, b) => {
+            if (b.score !== a.score)
+                return b.score - a.score;
+            return a.eIdx - b.eIdx; // ties → chronological order
+        });
+        const topKEvidence = scored.slice(0, topK);
+        // Relevance-floor filter: if any selected evidence scored ≥6,
+        // drop low-relevance entries that are >2 points below the weakest
+        // high-relevance entry.
+        const highScores = topKEvidence
+            .filter((s) => s.score >= 6)
+            .map((s) => s.score);
+        if (highScores.length === 0) {
+            grouped.set(cIdx, topKEvidence.map((s) => s.eIdx));
+            continue;
+        }
+        const minHigh = Math.min(...highScores);
+        const kept = topKEvidence.filter((s) => !(s.score < 5 && minHigh - s.score > 2));
+        grouped.set(cIdx, (kept.length > 0 ? kept : topKEvidence).map((s) => s.eIdx));
+    }
+    return grouped;
+}
+function mapFusedPerCriterionToScores(rubric, perCriterion) {
+    const byIdx = new Map();
+    for (const entry of perCriterion)
+        byIdx.set(entry.criterion_idx, entry);
+    return rubric.items.map((c, i) => {
+        const entry = byIdx.get(i);
+        if (!entry) {
+            return {
+                criterion: c.criterion,
+                maxPoints: c.maxPoints,
+                earnedPoints: null,
+                explanation: "Verifier did not return a score for this criterion.",
+                evidenceInsufficient: true,
+            };
+        }
+        const clamped = Math.max(0, Math.min(c.maxPoints, entry.earned_points));
+        return {
+            criterion: c.criterion,
+            maxPoints: c.maxPoints,
+            earnedPoints: clamped,
+            explanation: entry.justification,
+            evidenceInsufficient: entry.evidence_sufficient === false,
+        };
+    });
+}
+function evidencePreview(point, previewChars) {
+    if ((0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(point)) {
+        return `Screenshot at step ${point.originalStepIndex} (${point.bytes.length} bytes, ${point.mediaType})`;
+    }
+    const preview = point.content.slice(0, previewChars);
+    return `${textEvidenceLabel(point)} at step ${point.originalStepIndex} — "${preview.replace(/\s+/g, " ")}${point.content.length > previewChars ? "…" : ""}"`;
+}
+function textEvidenceLabel(point) {
+    switch (point.source) {
+        case "probe-aria":
+            return "ariaTree";
+        case "agent-text":
+            return "agent text";
+        case "agent-json":
+            return "agent JSON";
+        case "tool-output":
+            return "tool output";
+    }
+}
+function renderEvidenceManifest(points, previewChars) {
+    if (points.length === 0)
+        return "(no evidence captured)";
+    return points
+        .map((p) => `- evidence_idx=${p.canonicalIndex}: ${evidencePreview(p, previewChars)}`)
+        .join("\n");
+}
+function renderGroupedEvidenceForApproach(rubric, evidence, groupedTopK, textLimit) {
+    if (evidence.length === 0)
+        return "(no evidence captured)";
+    const byIdx = new Map();
+    for (const e of evidence)
+        byIdx.set(e.canonicalIndex, e);
+    const sections = [];
+    for (let cIdx = 0; cIdx < rubric.items.length; cIdx++) {
+        const c = rubric.items[cIdx];
+        const topK = groupedTopK.get(cIdx) ?? [];
+        if (topK.length === 0) {
+            sections.push(`### Criterion ${cIdx}: ${c.criterion}\n(no evidence scored highly enough — rely on action history)`);
+            continue;
+        }
+        const body = topK
+            .map((eIdx) => {
+            const p = byIdx.get(eIdx);
+            if (!p)
+                return null;
+            if ((0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(p)) {
+                return `- Evidence #${eIdx} — image @ step=${p.originalStepIndex}`;
+            }
+            const text = p.content.replace(/\s+/g, " ").slice(0, textLimit);
+            return `- Evidence #${eIdx} — ${textEvidenceLabel(p)} @ step=${p.originalStepIndex}: "${text}${p.content.length > textLimit ? "…" : ""}"`;
+        })
+            .filter((x) => x !== null)
+            .join("\n");
+        sections.push(`### Criterion ${cIdx}: ${c.criterion}\n${body}`);
+    }
+    return sections.join("\n\n");
+}
+class RubricVerifier {
+    getClient;
+    getRubricGenClient;
+    logger;
+    baseConfig;
+    constructor(opts) {
+        this.getClient = opts.getClient;
+        this.getRubricGenClient = opts.getRubricGenClient ?? opts.getClient;
+        this.logger = opts.logger ?? noopLogger;
+        this.baseConfig = resolveVerifierConfig(process.env, opts.config);
+    }
+    /** Resolved verifier knobs the constructor saw, frozen at construction. */
+    get config() {
+        return this.baseConfig;
+    }
+    async verify(trajectory, overrides) {
+        const taskSpec = trajectory.task;
+        const config = mergeConfig(this.baseConfig, overrides);
+        const hasTrajectorySignal = trajectory.steps.length > 0 || Boolean(trajectory.finalAnswer?.trim());
+        if (!hasTrajectorySignal) {
+            return this.emptyTrajectoryResult((0, trajectory_js_1.normalizeRubric)(taskSpec.precomputedRubric));
+        }
+        const { approach, optionalSteps: optionalsMode } = config;
+        if (approach === "outcome-only") {
+            return this.verifyOutcomeOnly(trajectory, taskSpec, config);
+        }
+        let rubric = (0, trajectory_js_1.normalizeRubric)(taskSpec.precomputedRubric);
+        const rubricSource = rubric ? "precomputed" : "generated";
+        if (!rubric) {
+            rubric = await this.generateRubric(taskSpec);
+        }
+        // Empty-evidence trajectories fall back gracefully — the chosen approach
+        // degrades to an action-history-only judgment downstream.
+        const { evidence, loaded } = await (0, evidence_js_1.collectCanonicalEvidence)(trajectory);
+        const relevanceScores = await this.scoreRelevanceBatched({
+            taskSpec,
+            rubric,
+            evidence,
+            config,
+        });
+        const groupedTopK = groupTopKByCriterion({
+            numCriteria: rubric.items.length,
+            relevanceScores,
+            topK: config.topK,
+        });
+        let perCriterion;
+        let fusedOutcome;
+        let foldedFailurePoint;
+        let foldedTaskValidity;
+        if (approach === "b") {
+            const fused = await this.fusedJudgment({
+                trajectory,
+                taskSpec,
+                rubric,
+                evidence,
+                groupedTopK,
+                foldFailure: optionalsMode === "folded",
+                foldValidity: optionalsMode === "folded",
+                config,
+            });
+            perCriterion = mapFusedPerCriterionToScores(rubric, fused.per_criterion);
+            fusedOutcome = fused.outcome;
+            foldedFailurePoint = fused.failure_point;
+            foldedTaskValidity = fused.task_validity;
+        }
+        else {
+            // Approach a: per-criterion analysis returns earned_points directly;
+            // no separate whole-rubric rescore.
+            perCriterion = await this.scorePerCriterion({
+                trajectory,
+                taskSpec,
+                rubric,
+                evidence,
+                groupedTopK,
+                config,
+            });
+            const outcome = await this.verifyOutcomeFused({
+                trajectory,
+                taskSpec,
+                rubric,
+                perCriterion,
+                evidence,
+                foldFailure: optionalsMode === "folded",
+                foldValidity: optionalsMode === "folded",
+                config,
+            });
+            fusedOutcome = outcome.outcome;
+            foldedFailurePoint = outcome.failure_point;
+            foldedTaskValidity = outcome.task_validity;
+        }
+        // ── Process score (deterministic from earned_points) ──────────────────
+        const totals = perCriterion.reduce((acc, c) => ({
+            earned: acc.earned + (c.earnedPoints ?? 0),
+            max: acc.max + c.maxPoints,
+        }), { earned: 0, max: 0 });
+        const processScore = totals.max > 0 ? totals.earned / totals.max : 0;
+        const evidenceInsufficient = perCriterion
+            .filter((c) => c.evidenceInsufficient)
+            .map((c) => c.criterion);
+        const findings = (fusedOutcome?.findings ?? []).map((f) => ({
+            ...f,
+            category: f.category ?? "other",
+            severity: f.severity ?? "info",
+        }));
+        // ── Optional steps: folded, separate, or skipped ──────────────────────
+        let firstPointOfFailure;
+        if (foldedFailurePoint && !fusedOutcome?.output_success) {
+            firstPointOfFailure = {
+                stepIndex: foldedFailurePoint.step_index,
+                errorCode: foldedFailurePoint.error_code,
+                category: foldedFailurePoint.error_category,
+                description: foldedFailurePoint.description,
+            };
+        }
+        else if (optionalsMode === "separate" &&
+            fusedOutcome &&
+            !fusedOutcome.output_success) {
+            firstPointOfFailure = await this.analyzeFailures({
+                trajectory,
+                taskSpec,
+                rubric,
+                perCriterion,
+                outcome: {
+                    output_success: fusedOutcome.output_success,
+                    primary_intent: fusedOutcome.primary_intent,
+                    reasoning: fusedOutcome.reasoning,
+                    findings: fusedOutcome.findings ?? [],
+                },
+                config,
+            }).catch(() => undefined);
+        }
+        let taskValidity;
+        if (foldedTaskValidity) {
+            taskValidity = {
+                isAmbiguous: foldedTaskValidity.is_ambiguous,
+                isInvalid: foldedTaskValidity.is_invalid,
+                ambiguityReason: foldedTaskValidity.is_ambiguous && foldedTaskValidity.ambiguity_reason
+                    ? foldedTaskValidity.ambiguity_reason
+                    : undefined,
+                invalidReason: foldedTaskValidity.is_invalid && foldedTaskValidity.invalid_reason
+                    ? foldedTaskValidity.invalid_reason
+                    : undefined,
+            };
+        }
+        else if (optionalsMode === "separate") {
+            taskValidity = await this.classifyTaskValidity(taskSpec).catch(() => ({
+                isAmbiguous: false,
+                isInvalid: false,
+            }));
+        }
+        else {
+            taskValidity = { isAmbiguous: false, isInvalid: false };
+        }
+        return {
+            outcomeSuccess: fusedOutcome?.output_success ?? false,
+            processScore,
+            perCriterion,
+            taskValidity,
+            evidenceInsufficient,
+            findings: findings.length > 0 ? findings : undefined,
+            firstPointOfFailure,
+            rawSteps: {
+                primaryIntent: fusedOutcome?.primary_intent,
+                reasoning: fusedOutcome?.reasoning,
+                rubricSource,
+                approach,
+                optionalsMode,
+                totalEarned: totals.earned,
+                totalMax: totals.max,
+                evidenceImages: evidence.filter(evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence).length,
+                evidenceTexts: evidence.filter(evidence_js_1.isTextEvidence).length,
+                evidenceOriginalScreenshots: loaded.originalCount,
+            },
+        };
+    }
+    emptyTrajectoryResult(rubric) {
+        const items = rubric?.items ?? [];
+        return {
+            outcomeSuccess: false,
+            explanation: "No trajectory steps or final answer were captured; skipped verifier LLM calls.",
+            processScore: 0,
+            perCriterion: items.map((c) => ({
+                criterion: c.criterion,
+                maxPoints: c.maxPoints,
+                earnedPoints: 0,
+                explanation: "No trajectory steps or final answer were captured; skipped verifier LLM calls.",
+                evidenceInsufficient: true,
+            })),
+            taskValidity: { isAmbiguous: false, isInvalid: false },
+            evidenceInsufficient: items.map((c) => c.criterion),
+            rawSteps: {
+                reason: "empty-trajectory",
+                rubricSource: rubric ? "precomputed" : "none",
+            },
+        };
+    }
+    async verifyOutcomeOnly(trajectory, taskSpec, config) {
+        const foldFailure = config.optionalSteps === "folded";
+        const foldValidity = config.optionalSteps === "folded";
+        const taxonomyBlock = foldFailure
+            ? `\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(1, 6, 4)}\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(7, 8, 4)}\n`
+            : "";
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.FUSED_OUTCOME_PROMPT, {
+            task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+            init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+            action_history: this.formatActionHistory(trajectory, config),
+            outcome_evidence_summary: this.buildOutcomeEvidenceSummary(trajectory, taskSpec, config),
+            final_state_block: buildFinalStateBlock(trajectory),
+            agent_predicted_output: trajectory.finalAnswer ?? "(no final answer recorded)",
+            rubric_summary: "(no rubric - outcome-only mode; judge success from the task, action history, final answer, and attached screenshots)",
+            taxonomy_block: taxonomyBlock,
+            fold_failure_analysis: foldFailure ? "true" : "false",
+            fold_task_validity: foldValidity ? "true" : "false",
+            current_date: currentDateForVerifier(),
+        });
+        const messageContent = [{ type: "text", text: prompt }];
+        // Final images first (always attached), then recent images deduped.
+        const seenImageKeys = new Set();
+        const attachImage = (img) => {
+            const key = `${img.bytes.length}:${img.bytes.subarray(0, 32).toString("base64")}`;
+            if (seenImageKeys.has(key))
+                return;
+            seenImageKeys.add(key);
+            messageContent.push({
+                type: "image_url",
+                image_url: {
+                    url: `data:${img.mediaType};base64,${img.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                },
+            });
+        };
+        for (const img of selectFinalImages(trajectory))
+            attachImage(img);
+        for (const img of selectRecentImages(trajectory, config.outcomeMaxImages))
+            attachImage(img);
+        let fused;
+        try {
+            const client = this.getClient();
+            const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                logger: this.logger,
+                options: {
+                    messages: [
+                        {
+                            role: "system",
+                            content: "You are an expert evaluator of web-navigation agent trajectories. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                        },
+                        { role: "user", content: messageContent },
+                    ],
+                    response_model: {
+                        name: "FusedOutcome",
+                        schema: FusedOutcomeResponseSchema,
+                    },
+                },
+            });
+            fused = response.data;
+        }
+        catch {
+            fused = {
+                outcome: {
+                    primary_intent: taskSpec.instruction,
+                    reasoning: "Outcome-only LLM call failed; defaulting to output_success=false.",
+                    output_success: false,
+                    findings: [
+                        {
+                            category: "verifier_uncertainty",
+                            severity: "warning",
+                            description: "The outcome-only verification call did not return a parseable response.",
+                        },
+                    ],
+                },
+            };
+        }
+        const outcomeSuccess = fused.outcome.output_success;
+        const findings = (fused.outcome.findings ?? []).map((f) => ({
+            ...f,
+            category: f.category ?? "other",
+            severity: f.severity ?? "info",
+        }));
+        let firstPointOfFailure;
+        if (fused.failure_point && !outcomeSuccess) {
+            firstPointOfFailure = {
+                stepIndex: fused.failure_point.step_index,
+                errorCode: fused.failure_point.error_code,
+                category: fused.failure_point.error_category,
+                description: fused.failure_point.description,
+            };
+        }
+        const taskValidity = fused.task_validity
+            ? {
+                isAmbiguous: fused.task_validity.is_ambiguous,
+                isInvalid: fused.task_validity.is_invalid,
+                ambiguityReason: fused.task_validity.is_ambiguous &&
+                    fused.task_validity.ambiguity_reason
+                    ? fused.task_validity.ambiguity_reason
+                    : undefined,
+                invalidReason: fused.task_validity.is_invalid && fused.task_validity.invalid_reason
+                    ? fused.task_validity.invalid_reason
+                    : undefined,
+            }
+            : { isAmbiguous: false, isInvalid: false };
+        return {
+            outcomeSuccess,
+            explanation: fused.outcome.reasoning,
+            taskValidity,
+            findings: findings.length > 0 ? findings : undefined,
+            firstPointOfFailure,
+            rawSteps: {
+                primaryIntent: fused.outcome.primary_intent,
+                reasoning: fused.outcome.reasoning,
+                approach: "outcome-only",
+                optionalsMode: config.optionalSteps,
+                screenshotsAttached: seenImageKeys.size,
+            },
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Score every (evidence, criterion) pair with one batched call per chunk,
+     * to avoid a per-(criterion, frame) fan-out. Failed batches contribute
+     * all-zeros scores so the downstream top-K still produces valid groups.
+     */
+    async scoreRelevanceBatched(args) {
+        const { taskSpec, rubric, evidence, config } = args;
+        const out = new Map();
+        if (evidence.length === 0)
+            return out;
+        const numCriteria = rubric.items.length;
+        const rubricCriteriaText = rubric.items
+            .map((c, i) => `\n${i}. **${c.criterion}**\n   Description: ${c.description}\n`)
+            .join("");
+        const batchSize = Math.max(1, config.relevanceBatchSize);
+        const batches = [];
+        for (let i = 0; i < evidence.length; i += batchSize) {
+            batches.push(evidence.slice(i, i + batchSize));
+        }
+        const limit = pLimit(config.maxParallel);
+        const tasks = batches.map((batch) => limit(async () => {
+            const manifest = renderEvidenceManifest(batch, config.truncation.evidenceTextPreview);
+            const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.MM_BATCHED_RELEVANCE_PROMPT, {
+                task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+                init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+                rubric_criteria: rubricCriteriaText,
+                evidence_manifest: manifest,
+            });
+            const messageContent = [{ type: "text", text: prompt }];
+            for (const ev of batch) {
+                if ((0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(ev)) {
+                    messageContent.push({
+                        type: "image_url",
+                        image_url: {
+                            url: `data:${ev.mediaType};base64,${ev.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                        },
+                    });
+                }
+                else {
+                    messageContent.push({
+                        type: "text",
+                        text: `\n[evidence_idx=${ev.canonicalIndex} — ${textEvidenceLabel(ev)} at step ${ev.originalStepIndex}]\n${ev.content}\n`,
+                    });
+                }
+            }
+            try {
+                const client = this.getClient();
+                const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                    logger: this.logger,
+                    options: {
+                        messages: [
+                            {
+                                role: "system",
+                                content: "You are scoring how relevant each evidence point in a batch is to each rubric criterion. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                            },
+                            { role: "user", content: messageContent },
+                        ],
+                        response_model: {
+                            name: "BatchedRelevance",
+                            schema: BatchedRelevanceResponseSchema,
+                        },
+                    },
+                });
+                const data = response.data;
+                for (const item of data.items) {
+                    const scoreMap = new Map();
+                    for (const s of item.scores) {
+                        if (s.criterion_idx >= 0 && s.criterion_idx < numCriteria) {
+                            scoreMap.set(s.criterion_idx, s.score);
+                        }
+                    }
+                    for (let i = 0; i < numCriteria; i++) {
+                        if (!scoreMap.has(i))
+                            scoreMap.set(i, 0);
+                    }
+                    out.set(item.evidence_idx, scoreMap);
+                }
+            }
+            catch {
+                // Per-batch failure: zero out the whole batch so the pipeline
+                // continues — top-K won't select these evidence points.
+                for (const ev of batch) {
+                    const scoreMap = new Map();
+                    for (let i = 0; i < numCriteria; i++)
+                        scoreMap.set(i, 0);
+                    out.set(ev.canonicalIndex, scoreMap);
+                }
+            }
+        }));
+        await Promise.all(tasks);
+        // Pad any missing evidence indices with zeros (defensive against the
+        // model omitting batch entries).
+        for (const ev of evidence) {
+            if (!out.has(ev.canonicalIndex)) {
+                const scoreMap = new Map();
+                for (let i = 0; i < numCriteria; i++)
+                    scoreMap.set(i, 0);
+                out.set(ev.canonicalIndex, scoreMap);
+            }
+        }
+        return out;
+    }
+    /**
+     * One call per rubric criterion. Each call sees the criterion's top-K
+     * evidence points (images + ariaTree snippets), the action history, and
+     * the final answer; the response includes `earned_points` directly so the
+     * process score is deterministic (Σ earned / Σ max).
+     */
+    async scorePerCriterion(args) {
+        const { trajectory, taskSpec, rubric, evidence, groupedTopK, config } = args;
+        if (rubric.items.length === 0)
+            return [];
+        const evidenceByIdx = new Map();
+        for (const e of evidence)
+            evidenceByIdx.set(e.canonicalIndex, e);
+        const actionHistory = this.formatActionHistory(trajectory, config);
+        const predictedOutput = trajectory.finalAnswer ?? "(no final answer recorded)";
+        const limit = pLimit(config.maxParallel);
+        const tasks = rubric.items.map((criterion, cIdx) => limit(async () => {
+            const topK = groupedTopK.get(cIdx) ?? [];
+            const evidencePoints = topK
+                .map((eIdx) => evidenceByIdx.get(eIdx))
+                .filter((e) => e !== undefined);
+            const manifest = evidencePoints.length === 0
+                ? "(no evidence scored highly enough for this criterion — rely on action history)"
+                : renderEvidenceManifest(evidencePoints, config.truncation.evidenceTextPreview);
+            const conditionLine = criterion.condition
+                ? `- Condition: ${criterion.condition}`
+                : "";
+            const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.MM_PER_CRITERION_SCORE_PROMPT, {
+                task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+                init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+                action_history: actionHistory,
+                agent_predicted_output: predictedOutput,
+                criterion_idx: cIdx,
+                criterion_name: criterion.criterion,
+                criterion_description: criterion.description,
+                criterion_max_points: criterion.maxPoints,
+                criterion_condition: conditionLine,
+                evidence_manifest: manifest,
+            });
+            const messageContent = [{ type: "text", text: prompt }];
+            for (const ev of evidencePoints) {
+                if ((0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(ev)) {
+                    messageContent.push({
+                        type: "image_url",
+                        image_url: {
+                            url: `data:${ev.mediaType};base64,${ev.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                        },
+                    });
+                }
+                else {
+                    messageContent.push({
+                        type: "text",
+                        text: `\n[evidence_idx=${ev.canonicalIndex} — ${textEvidenceLabel(ev)} at step ${ev.originalStepIndex}]\n${ev.content}\n`,
+                    });
+                }
+            }
+            try {
+                const client = this.getClient();
+                const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                    logger: this.logger,
+                    options: {
+                        messages: [
+                            {
+                                role: "system",
+                                content: "You are scoring one rubric criterion against the most relevant evidence from an agent's trajectory. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                            },
+                            { role: "user", content: messageContent },
+                        ],
+                        response_model: {
+                            name: "PerCriterionScore",
+                            schema: PerCriterionScoreResponseSchema,
+                        },
+                    },
+                });
+                const data = response.data;
+                const clamped = Math.max(0, Math.min(criterion.maxPoints, data.earned_points));
+                return {
+                    criterion: criterion.criterion,
+                    maxPoints: criterion.maxPoints,
+                    earnedPoints: clamped,
+                    explanation: data.justification,
+                    evidenceInsufficient: data.evidence_sufficient === false,
+                };
+            }
+            catch {
+                return {
+                    criterion: criterion.criterion,
+                    maxPoints: criterion.maxPoints,
+                    earnedPoints: null,
+                    explanation: "Per-criterion scoring call failed; falling back to evidence-insufficient.",
+                    evidenceInsufficient: true,
+                };
+            }
+        }));
+        return Promise.all(tasks);
+    }
+    /**
+     * Single fused multimodal call returning the full EvaluationResult shape:
+     * rubric + per-criterion top-K evidence + action history + final answer.
+     * Optionally folds in first-point-of-failure and task-validity. Image
+     * evidence rides inline; ariaTree text is embedded in the prompt under
+     * each criterion's manifest section.
+     */
+    async fusedJudgment(args) {
+        const { trajectory, taskSpec, rubric, evidence, groupedTopK, foldFailure, foldValidity, config, } = args;
+        const evidenceByIdx = new Map();
+        for (const e of evidence)
+            evidenceByIdx.set(e.canonicalIndex, e);
+        const usedImageIndices = new Set();
+        for (const topK of groupedTopK.values()) {
+            for (const eIdx of topK) {
+                const p = evidenceByIdx.get(eIdx);
+                if (p && (0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(p))
+                    usedImageIndices.add(eIdx);
+            }
+        }
+        const usedImages = [...usedImageIndices]
+            .sort((a, b) => a - b)
+            .map((eIdx) => evidenceByIdx.get(eIdx))
+            .filter((p) => !!p && (0, evidence_js_1.isImageEvidence)(p));
+        const rubricBlock = rubric.items
+            .map((c, i) => {
+            const cond = c.condition ? `\n   Condition: ${c.condition}` : "";
+            return `Criterion ${i} — "${c.criterion}" (max ${c.maxPoints} pts):\n   Description: ${c.description}${cond}`;
+        })
+            .join("\n\n");
+        const evidenceBlock = renderGroupedEvidenceForApproach(rubric, evidence, groupedTopK, config.truncation.groupedEvidenceText);
+        const taxonomyBlock = foldFailure
+            ? `\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(1, 6, 4)}\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(7, 8, 4)}\n`
+            : "";
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.FUSED_JUDGMENT_PROMPT, {
+            task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+            init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+            action_history: this.formatActionHistory(trajectory, config),
+            agent_predicted_output: trajectory.finalAnswer ?? "(no final answer recorded)",
+            rubric_block: rubricBlock,
+            evidence_block: evidenceBlock,
+            final_state_block: buildFinalStateBlock(trajectory),
+            taxonomy_block: taxonomyBlock,
+            fold_failure_analysis: foldFailure ? "true" : "false",
+            fold_task_validity: foldValidity ? "true" : "false",
+            current_date: currentDateForVerifier(),
+        });
+        const messageContent = [{ type: "text", text: prompt }];
+        // Always include the terminal visual evidence first — these bytes are the
+        // single most reliable signal of what the agent actually saw at the end
+        // of the run, and they're not subject to the per-criterion top-K cutoff.
+        // Dedupe by content so we don't pay tokens twice when the top-K already
+        // picked the same frame.
+        const finalImageBytes = new Set();
+        for (const img of selectFinalImages(trajectory)) {
+            const key = `${img.bytes.length}:${img.bytes.subarray(0, 32).toString("base64")}`;
+            finalImageBytes.add(key);
+            messageContent.push({
+                type: "image_url",
+                image_url: {
+                    url: `data:${img.mediaType};base64,${img.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                },
+            });
+        }
+        for (const img of usedImages) {
+            const key = `${img.bytes.length}:${img.bytes.subarray(0, 32).toString("base64")}`;
+            if (finalImageBytes.has(key))
+                continue;
+            messageContent.push({
+                type: "image_url",
+                image_url: {
+                    url: `data:${img.mediaType};base64,${img.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                },
+            });
+        }
+        try {
+            const client = this.getClient();
+            const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                logger: this.logger,
+                options: {
+                    messages: [
+                        {
+                            role: "system",
+                            content: "You are an expert evaluator of web-navigation agent trajectories. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                        },
+                        { role: "user", content: messageContent },
+                    ],
+                    response_model: {
+                        name: "FusedJudgment",
+                        schema: FusedJudgmentResponseSchema,
+                    },
+                },
+            });
+            return response.data;
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            // Hard failure of the fused call: synthesize a no-confidence result
+            // so the pipeline can still produce an EvaluationResult object.
+            void e;
+            return {
+                outcome: {
+                    primary_intent: taskSpec.instruction,
+                    reasoning: "Fused judgment LLM call failed; returning evidence-insufficient result.",
+                    output_success: false,
+                    findings: [
+                        {
+                            category: "verifier_uncertainty",
+                            severity: "warning",
+                            description: "The fused judgment call did not return a parseable response.",
+                        },
+                    ],
+                },
+                per_criterion: rubric.items.map((c, i) => ({
+                    criterion_idx: i,
+                    applicable_evidence: "",
+                    justification: "Fused judgment call failed for this criterion.",
+                    earned_points: 0,
+                    evidence_sufficient: false,
+                })),
+            };
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * Consume the pre-scored rubric from scorePerCriterion and produce the
+     * outcome result. When foldFailure/foldValidity are set, the response also
+     * includes first-point-of-failure and task-validity, saving 1–2 extra
+     * LLM calls.
+     */
+    async verifyOutcomeFused(args) {
+        const { trajectory, taskSpec, rubric, perCriterion, foldFailure, foldValidity, config, } = args;
+        void args.evidence;
+        const taxonomyBlock = foldFailure
+            ? `\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(1, 6, 4)}\n${(0, errorTaxonomy_js_1.getTaxonomyText)(7, 8, 4)}\n`
+            : "";
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.FUSED_OUTCOME_PROMPT, {
+            task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+            init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+            action_history: this.formatActionHistory(trajectory, config),
+            outcome_evidence_summary: this.buildOutcomeEvidenceSummary(trajectory, taskSpec, config),
+            final_state_block: buildFinalStateBlock(trajectory),
+            agent_predicted_output: trajectory.finalAnswer ?? "(no final answer recorded)",
+            rubric_summary: this.formatScoredRubricSummary(rubric, perCriterion),
+            taxonomy_block: taxonomyBlock,
+            fold_failure_analysis: foldFailure ? "true" : "false",
+            fold_task_validity: foldValidity ? "true" : "false",
+            current_date: currentDateForVerifier(),
+        });
+        // Always attach the terminal screenshots so the outcome judge can see the
+        // final page state, regardless of the (formerly text-only) evidence
+        // summary heuristics.
+        const messageContent = [{ type: "text", text: prompt }];
+        for (const img of selectFinalImages(trajectory)) {
+            messageContent.push({
+                type: "image_url",
+                image_url: {
+                    url: `data:${img.mediaType};base64,${img.bytes.toString("base64")}`,
+                },
+            });
+        }
+        try {
+            const client = this.getClient();
+            const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                logger: this.logger,
+                options: {
+                    messages: [
+                        {
+                            role: "system",
+                            content: "You are an expert evaluator of web-navigation agent trajectories. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                        },
+                        { role: "user", content: messageContent },
+                    ],
+                    response_model: {
+                        name: "FusedOutcome",
+                        schema: FusedOutcomeResponseSchema,
+                    },
+                },
+            });
+            return response.data;
+        }
+        catch {
+            // Failure surfaces as a no-confidence result.
+            return {
+                outcome: {
+                    primary_intent: taskSpec.instruction,
+                    reasoning: "Outcome LLM call failed; defaulting to output_success=false.",
+                    output_success: false,
+                    findings: [
+                        {
+                            category: "verifier_uncertainty",
+                            severity: "warning",
+                            description: "The outcome verification call did not return a parseable response.",
+                        },
+                    ],
+                },
+            };
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * Flat per-step evidence summary — fallback for trajectories with no
+     * probe screenshots, such as harness-adapter or stubbed trajectories.
+     */
+    buildEvidenceContext(trajectory, config, opts = {}) {
+        if (trajectory.steps.length === 0) {
+            return { text: "(no steps captured)", images: [] };
+        }
+        const textLimit = config.truncation.buildEvidenceText;
+        const ariaLimit = config.truncation.buildEvidenceAria;
+        const text = clampToTokenBudget(trajectory.steps
+            .map((s, i) => {
+            const url = s.probeEvidence.url ? `, url=${s.probeEvidence.url}` : "";
+            const hasScreenshot = s.probeEvidence.screenshotPath || s.probeEvidence.screenshot
+                ? "yes"
+                : "no";
+            const tier1 = s.agentEvidence.modalities
+                .map((m) => {
+                if (m.type === "text")
+                    return `text(${m.content.slice(0, textLimit)})`;
+                if (m.type === "image")
+                    return `image(${m.bytes.length} bytes)`;
+                return `json(${safeJsonSnippet(m.content, 180)})`;
+            })
+                .join(", ");
+            const toolOutput = safeJsonSnippet(s.toolOutput.result, 220);
+            // Include the post-step a11y dump when captured — textual ground
+            // truth for criteria that can't be verified from the visual probe
+            // alone (prices, names, list contents). Per-step cap keeps the
+            // total budget bounded.
+            const ariaSnippet = typeof s.probeEvidence.ariaTree === "string" &&
+                s.probeEvidence.ariaTree.length > 0
+                ? `\n  aria_tree: ${s.probeEvidence.ariaTree.slice(0, ariaLimit)}${s.probeEvidence.ariaTree.length > ariaLimit
+                    ? "… [truncated]"
+                    : ""}`
+                : "";
+            return `Screenshot ${i + 1} — step=${i}, action=${s.actionName}${url}, probe_screenshot=${hasScreenshot}\n  tier1: ${tier1 || "(none)"}\n  tool_output: ${toolOutput}${ariaSnippet}`;
+        })
+            .join("\n\n"), config.evidenceTokenBudget);
+        if (opts.includeImages === false)
+            return { text, images: [] };
+        return {
+            text,
+            images: selectRecentImages(trajectory, config.outcomeMaxImages),
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Compact text evidence for the one-call outcome verifier.
+     *
+     * Outcome-only does not run the rubric relevance selector, but it still needs
+     * enough saved-page text to avoid replacing trajectory facts with model
+     * memory. Select a bounded set of lexically relevant and recent steps, then
+     * include short excerpts around task/final-answer terms.
+     */
+    buildOutcomeEvidenceSummary(trajectory, taskSpec, config) {
+        if (trajectory.steps.length === 0)
+            return "(no steps captured)";
+        const keywords = outcomeKeywords(`${taskSpec.instruction}\n${trajectory.finalAnswer ?? ""}`);
+        const lastImportantIndex = Math.max(0, trajectory.steps.length - 5);
+        const candidates = trajectory.steps.map((step, position) => {
+            const url = step.probeEvidence.url ?? "";
+            const ariaTree = step.probeEvidence.ariaTree ?? "";
+            const toolOutput = safeJsonSnippet(step.toolOutput?.result, 600);
+            const actionArgs = safeJsonSnippet(step.actionArgs, 400);
+            const haystack = [
+                step.actionName,
+                step.reasoning ?? "",
+                url,
+                actionArgs,
+                toolOutput,
+                ariaTree,
+            ]
+                .join("\n")
+                .toLowerCase();
+            let score = position >= lastImportantIndex ? 3 : 0;
+            if (url)
+                score += 1;
+            if (/extract|observe|aria|navigate|click|type|search/i.test(step.actionName)) {
+                score += 1;
+            }
+            for (const keyword of keywords) {
+                if (haystack.includes(keyword)) {
+                    score += keyword.length >= 8 ? 3 : 1;
+                }
+            }
+            return { step, position, score };
+        });
+        const selected = new Set();
+        for (const candidate of [...candidates]
+            .sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score || a.position - b.position)
+            .slice(0, OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_MAX_STEPS)) {
+            selected.add(candidate.position);
+        }
+        for (let i = Math.max(0, trajectory.steps.length - 4); i < trajectory.steps.length; i++) {
+            selected.add(i);
+        }
+        const sections = [...selected]
+            .sort((a, b) => a - b)
+            .map((position) => {
+            const step = trajectory.steps[position];
+            const url = step.probeEvidence.url
+                ? ` url=${step.probeEvidence.url}`
+                : "";
+            const reasoning = step.reasoning
+                ? `\n  reasoning: ${step.reasoning.slice(0, 220)}`
+                : "";
+            const toolOutput = step.toolOutput?.result
+                ? `\n  tool_output: ${safeJsonSnippet(step.toolOutput.result, 320)}`
+                : "";
+            const ariaExcerpt = step.probeEvidence.ariaTree
+                ? `\n  page_excerpt: ${bestOutcomeExcerpt(step.probeEvidence.ariaTree, keywords, OUTCOME_EVIDENCE_STEP_CHARS)}`
+                : "";
+            return `Step ${position}: ${step.actionName}(${summarizeArgs(step.actionArgs)})${url}${reasoning}${toolOutput}${ariaExcerpt}`;
+        });
+        return clampToTokenBudget(sections.join("\n\n"), config.outcomeEvidenceTokenBudget);
+    }
+    /** Generate a rubric from the task description alone. */
+    async generateRubric(taskSpec) {
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.RUBRIC_GENERATION_PROMPT, {
+            task_id: taskSpec.instruction,
+            init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+        });
+        const maxAttempts = 3;
+        let lastError;
+        for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxAttempts; attempt++) {
+            try {
+                const client = this.getRubricGenClient();
+                const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+                    logger: this.logger,
+                    options: {
+                        messages: [
+                            {
+                                role: "system",
+                                content: "You are an expert rubric author. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema requested in the user message. Do not include explanatory prose.",
+                            },
+                            { role: "user", content: prompt },
+                        ],
+                        response_model: { name: "Rubric", schema: RubricSchema },
+                    },
+                });
+                const data = response.data;
+                const normalized = (0, trajectory_js_1.normalizeRubric)({
+                    items: filterByTaskSpan(data.items, taskSpec.instruction, this.logger),
+                });
+                if (!normalized) {
+                    throw new Error("Rubric generation returned no rubric");
+                }
+                return normalized;
+            }
+            catch (err) {
+                lastError = err;
+                if (attempt === maxAttempts - 1)
+                    break;
+                await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 500 * 2 ** attempt));
+            }
+        }
+        throw lastError instanceof Error ? lastError : new Error(String(lastError));
+    }
+    /**
+     * Identify all distinct failure points using taxonomy categories 1–6
+     * (agent-controllable errors) and return the earliest one. Best-effort:
+     * returns undefined on LLM failure / unparseable output / no failures
+     * found, rather than blocking the rest of the pipeline.
+     */
+    async analyzeFailures(args) {
+        const { trajectory, taskSpec, rubric, perCriterion, outcome, config } = args;
+        const evidenceContext = this.buildEvidenceContext(trajectory, config, {
+            includeImages: false,
+        });
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.FIRST_POINT_OF_FAILURE_PROMPT, {
+            task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+            init_url_context: (0, index_js_1.buildInitUrlContext)(taskSpec.initUrl),
+            action_history: this.formatActionHistory(trajectory, config),
+            predicted_output: trajectory.finalAnswer ?? "(no final answer recorded)",
+            rubric_summary: this.formatScoredRubricSummary(rubric, perCriterion),
+            evidence_summary: evidenceContext.text,
+            outcome_verification: `output_success=${outcome.output_success}\nprimary_intent=${outcome.primary_intent}\nreasoning=${outcome.reasoning}`,
+        });
+        const client = this.getClient();
+        const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+            logger: this.logger,
+            options: {
+                messages: [
+                    {
+                        role: "system",
+                        content: "You are an expert failure analyst for computer-use web agents. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                    },
+                    { role: "user", content: prompt },
+                ],
+                response_model: {
+                    name: "FailureAnalysis",
+                    schema: FailureAnalysisSchema,
+                },
+            },
+        });
+        const data = response.data;
+        if (!data.has_failure || data.failure_points.length === 0)
+            return undefined;
+        // Find the failure with the earliest step number: lowest min-step across
+        // all failure_points.
+        let best = null;
+        for (const fp of data.failure_points) {
+            const steps = (0, index_js_1.parseFailureStepNumbers)(fp.step_numbers, {
+                maxStep: Math.max(0, trajectory.steps.length),
+            });
+            if (steps.length === 0)
+                continue;
+            const minStep = steps[0];
+            if (best === null || minStep < best.minStep) {
+                best = { minStep, point: fp };
+            }
+        }
+        if (best === null)
+            return undefined;
+        return {
+            stepIndex: best.minStep,
+            errorCode: best.point.error_code,
+            category: best.point.error_category,
+            description: `${best.point.error_type}: ${best.point.what_happened}`,
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Classify the task across ambiguity (taxonomy category 7) and
+     * validity/feasibility (category 8). Pure task-level analysis; no
+     * trajectory context needed. Best-effort: returns undefined on LLM error.
+     */
+    async classifyTaskValidity(taskSpec) {
+        const prompt = (0, index_js_1.renderPrompt)(index_js_1.TASK_VALIDITY_PROMPT, {
+            task_definition: taskSpec.instruction,
+            url: taskSpec.initUrl ?? "(none)",
+            // For browser-driven tasks the app is always Edge/Chrome. The prompt
+            // accepts a free-form apps field; keeping it accurate matters less than
+            // anchoring the model with non-empty context.
+            apps: "Edge",
+            date: new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10),
+        });
+        const client = this.getClient();
+        const response = await client.createChatCompletion({
+            logger: this.logger,
+            options: {
+                messages: [
+                    {
+                        role: "system",
+                        content: "You are an expert failure analyst for computer-use web agents. Output only valid JSON conforming to the schema in the user message.",
+                    },
+                    { role: "user", content: prompt },
+                ],
+                response_model: {
+                    name: "TaskValidity",
+                    schema: TaskValiditySchema,
+                },
+            },
+        });
+        const data = response.data;
+        return {
+            isAmbiguous: data.is_ambiguous,
+            isInvalid: data.is_invalid,
+            ambiguityReason: data.is_ambiguous && data.reasoning_is_ambiguous
+                ? data.reasoning_is_ambiguous
+                : undefined,
+            invalidReason: data.is_invalid && data.reasoning_is_invalid
+                ? data.reasoning_is_invalid
+                : undefined,
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Format the rubric with per-criterion rescored points + explanations.
+     * The outcome verifier reads this as advisory context — it sees how a
+     * separate scoring system viewed each criterion but forms its own result.
+     */
+    formatScoredRubricSummary(rubric, scores) {
+        return rubric.items
+            .map((c, i) => {
+            const cond = c.condition ? ` [condition: ${c.condition}]` : "";
+            const score = scores[i];
+            const earned = score?.earnedPoints ?? "—";
+            const explanation = score?.explanation ?? "";
+            return `${i + 1}. ${c.criterion} (${earned}/${c.maxPoints} pts)${cond}\n   Description: ${c.description}\n   Score explanation: ${explanation}`;
+        })
+            .join("\n\n");
+    }
+    /**
+     * Compact textual action history for embedding in prompts. One line per
+     * step. Full per-step detail lives in trajectory.json on disk.
+     */
+    formatActionHistory(trajectory, config) {
+        const reasoningLimit = config.truncation.actionHistoryReasoning;
+        const history = trajectory.steps
+            .map((s, i) => {
+            const argSummary = summarizeArgs(s.actionArgs);
+            const reasoning = (s.reasoning ?? "").slice(0, reasoningLimit);
+            const url = s.probeEvidence.url ? ` @ ${s.probeEvidence.url}` : "";
+            return `Step ${i}: ${s.actionName}(${argSummary})${url}${reasoning ? `\n  reasoning: ${reasoning}` : ""}`;
+        })
+            .join("\n");
+        return clampToTokenBudget(history, config.actionHistoryTokenBudget);
+    }
+}
+exports.RubricVerifier = RubricVerifier;
+/** FIFO concurrency limiter; avoids a new dep. */
+function pLimit(concurrency) {
+    const n = Math.max(1, Math.floor(concurrency));
+    let active = 0;
+    const queue = [];
+    const next = () => {
+        if (active >= n)
+            return;
+        const job = queue.shift();
+        if (job) {
+            active++;
+            job();
+        }
+    };
+    return (fn) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+        queue.push(() => {
+            fn()
+                .then(resolve, reject)
+                .finally(() => {
+                active--;
+                next();
+            });
+        });
+        next();
+    });
+}
+/**
+ * Always-attach final visual evidence: the trajectory's terminal page
+ * observation plus the last step's probe screenshot, deduped. Returned in
+ * chronological order (last-step probe first if both are present, then
+ * finalObservation as the closing frame).
+ *
+ * This bypasses the per-criterion top-K relevance ranking used by
+ * {@link fusedJudgment} and the (previously) text-only outcome prompt, so the
+ * judge LLM always sees what the page actually looked like at the end of the
+ * run — not just whatever images happened to rank well against keyword
+ * heuristics.
+ */
+function selectFinalImages(trajectory) {
+    const out = [];
+    const seen = new Set();
+    const push = (label, bytes) => {
+        if (!bytes || bytes.length === 0)
+            return;
+        const key = `${bytes.length}:${bytes.subarray(0, 32).toString("base64")}`;
+        if (seen.has(key))
+            return;
+        seen.add(key);
+        out.push({ label, bytes, mediaType: "image/png" });
+    };
+    const lastStepIdx = trajectory.steps.length - 1;
+    if (lastStepIdx >= 0) {
+        push(`step ${lastStepIdx} probe screenshot (final action)`, trajectory.steps[lastStepIdx].probeEvidence.screenshot);
+    }
+    push("trajectory final observation", trajectory.finalObservation?.screenshot);
+    return out;
+}
+/**
+ * Always-attach final textual evidence: the terminal page content (URL +
+ * ariaTree) at the end of the run. Prefers `trajectory.finalObservation`
+ * (the explicit post-run probe) and falls back to the last step's
+ * `probeEvidence`. Clamped to {@link FINAL_STATE_ARIA_CHARS}.
+ *
+ * Returns an empty string when no terminal observation is available — the
+ * caller should treat the resulting prompt section as "(no final state
+ * captured)" rather than omit the header entirely so the LLM doesn't think
+ * the field is missing.
+ */
+function buildFinalStateBlock(trajectory) {
+    const last = trajectory.steps[trajectory.steps.length - 1];
+    const sources = [];
+    if (last?.probeEvidence) {
+        sources.push({
+            label: `Last step (Step ${trajectory.steps.length - 1}, post-action)`,
+            url: last.probeEvidence.url,
+            ariaTree: last.probeEvidence.ariaTree,
+        });
+    }
+    if (trajectory.finalObservation) {
+        sources.push({
+            label: "Final observation (probed after trajectory ended)",
+            url: trajectory.finalObservation.url,
+            ariaTree: trajectory.finalObservation.ariaTree,
+        });
+    }
+    if (sources.length === 0)
+        return "(no final state captured)";
+    return sources
+        .map((s) => {
+        const aria = s.ariaTree && s.ariaTree.length > FINAL_STATE_ARIA_CHARS
+            ? `${s.ariaTree.slice(0, FINAL_STATE_ARIA_CHARS)}\n...[truncated ${s.ariaTree.length - FINAL_STATE_ARIA_CHARS} chars]`
+            : (s.ariaTree ?? "(no aria tree)");
+        const url = s.url ? `\n  url: ${s.url}` : "";
+        return `${s.label}:${url}\n  aria_tree:\n${aria}`;
+    })
+        .join("\n\n");
+}
+function selectRecentImages(trajectory, limit) {
+    if (limit <= 0)
+        return [];
+    const images = [];
+    const seen = new Set();
+    for (let i = trajectory.steps.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+        const step = trajectory.steps[i];
+        const candidates = [];
+        if (step.probeEvidence.screenshot) {
+            candidates.push({
+                label: `step ${i} probe screenshot`,
+                bytes: step.probeEvidence.screenshot,
+                mediaType: "image/png",
+            });
+        }
+        for (const modality of step.agentEvidence.modalities) {
+            if (modality.type === "image") {
+                candidates.push({
+                    label: `step ${i} agent image`,
+                    bytes: modality.bytes,
+                    mediaType: modality.mediaType,
+                });
+            }
+        }
+        for (const candidate of candidates) {
+            const key = `${candidate.mediaType}:${candidate.bytes.length}:${candidate.bytes.subarray(0, 32).toString("base64")}`;
+            if (seen.has(key))
+                continue;
+            seen.add(key);
+            images.push(candidate);
+            if (images.length >= limit)
+                return images.reverse();
+        }
+    }
+    return images.reverse();
+}
+function currentDateForVerifier() {
+    return new Date().toISOString().slice(0, 10);
+}
+const OUTCOME_KEYWORD_STOPWORDS = new Set([
+    "about",
+    "above",
+    "access",
+    "agent",
+    "also",
+    "answer",
+    "available",
+    "based",
+    "been",
+    "being",
+    "browser",
+    "class",
+    "click",
+    "correct",
+    "current",
+    "details",
+    "final",
+    "find",
+    "found",
+    "from",
+    "have",
+    "including",
+    "into",
+    "list",
+    "located",
+    "model",
+    "more",
+    "navigated",
+    "page",
+    "provided",
+    "request",
+    "requested",
+    "results",
+    "search",
+    "show",
+    "successfully",
+    "task",
+    "that",
+    "the",
+    "their",
+    "then",
+    "there",
+    "this",
+    "through",
+    "user",
+    "using",
+    "which",
+    "with",
+]);
+function outcomeKeywords(text) {
+    const counts = new Map();
+    for (const match of text.toLowerCase().matchAll(/[a-z0-9][a-z0-9._/-]*/g)) {
+        const word = match[0].replace(/^[-_./]+|[-_./]+$/g, "");
+        if (!word)
+            continue;
+        if (OUTCOME_KEYWORD_STOPWORDS.has(word))
+            continue;
+        if (word.length < 4 && !/\d/.test(word))
+            continue;
+        counts.set(word, (counts.get(word) ?? 0) + 1);
+    }
+    return [...counts.entries()]
+        .sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1] || b[0].length - a[0].length)
+        .slice(0, 36)
+        .map(([word]) => word)
+        .sort((a, b) => b.length - a.length || a.localeCompare(b));
+}
+function bestOutcomeExcerpt(text, keywords, maxChars) {
+    const compact = text.replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim();
+    if (compact.length <= maxChars)
+        return compact;
+    const lower = compact.toLowerCase();
+    let bestIndex = -1;
+    for (const keyword of keywords) {
+        const idx = lower.indexOf(keyword);
+        if (idx >= 0) {
+            bestIndex = idx;
+            break;
+        }
+    }
+    if (bestIndex < 0) {
+        return `${compact.slice(0, maxChars)}... [truncated]`;
+    }
+    const before = Math.floor(maxChars * 0.35);
+    const start = Math.max(0, bestIndex - before);
+    const end = Math.min(compact.length, start + maxChars);
+    const prefix = start > 0 ? "... " : "";
+    const suffix = end < compact.length ? " ... [truncated]" : "";
+    return `${prefix}${compact.slice(start, end)}${suffix}`;
+}
+function clampToTokenBudget(text, tokenBudget) {
+    const maxChars = Math.max(0, tokenBudget) * APPROX_CHARS_PER_TOKEN;
+    if (maxChars === 0 || text.length <= maxChars)
+        return text;
+    const keepHead = Math.floor(maxChars * 0.35);
+    const keepTail = Math.max(0, maxChars - keepHead - 120);
+    return [
+        text.slice(0, keepHead).trimEnd(),
+        `\n...[truncated ${text.length - keepHead - keepTail} chars to fit verifier context budget]...\n`,
+        text.slice(text.length - keepTail).trimStart(),
+    ].join("");
+}
+function filterByTaskSpan(items, taskInstruction, logger) {
+    const normalizedTask = normalizeForSpanMatch(taskInstruction);
+    const kept = [];
+    const dropped = [];
+    for (const item of items) {
+        const span = item.task_span?.trim();
+        if (!span) {
+            dropped.push({
+                criterion: item.criterion,
+                reason: "missing task_span",
+            });
+            continue;
+        }
+        if (span === "<critical-point>" ||
+            normalizedTask.includes(normalizeForSpanMatch(span))) {
+            kept.push(item);
+            continue;
+        }
+        dropped.push({
+            criterion: item.criterion,
+            reason: `task_span ${JSON.stringify(span)} not found in task instruction`,
+        });
+    }
+    if (dropped.length > 0) {
+        logger({
+            category: "v3-evaluator",
+            message: "rubric: dropped hallucinated criteria via task_span filter",
+            auxiliary: {
+                droppedCount: { value: String(dropped.length), type: "integer" },
+                dropped: {
+                    value: JSON.stringify(dropped),
+                    type: "object",
+                },
+            },
+        });
+    }
+    return kept;
+}
+function normalizeForSpanMatch(value) {
+    return value.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim();
+}
+function safeJsonSnippet(value, maxChars) {
+    let raw;
+    try {
+        raw = typeof value === "string" ? value : JSON.stringify(value);
+    }
+    catch {
+        raw = String(value);
+    }
+    if (raw === undefined)
+        return "(undefined)";
+    return raw.length > maxChars ? `${raw.slice(0, maxChars)}...` : raw;
+}
+function summarizeArgs(args) {
+    const keys = Object.keys(args);
+    if (keys.length === 0)
+        return "";
+    return keys
+        .slice(0, 3)
+        .map((k) => {
+        const v = args[k];
+        if (typeof v === "string")
+            return `${k}: ${v.slice(0, 60)}`;
+        if (typeof v === "number" || typeof v === "boolean")
+            return `${k}: ${v}`;
+        return `${k}: ${typeof v}`;
+    })
+        .join(", ");
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=rubricVerifier.js.map