@brainervirus/workit-codex 1.0.0 → 1.0.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "workit",
3
- "version": "1.0.0",
3
+ "version": "1.0.2",
4
4
  "description": "Adaptive engineering workflow rails for Codex",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "BrainerVirus"
@@ -10489,7 +10489,10 @@ check and review kinds auto-bind the current tree and need no digests. Record
10489
10489
  verification evidence last: later evidence or commits can reopen fixed findings
10490
10490
  for re-verification, so verify, resolve, then close with nothing in between.
10491
10491
  decision.record {binding with taskId/workspaceId from inspect plus presented and
10492
- approvedContent} only through a native approval question, task.close {outcome,
10492
+ approvedContent} only through a native approval question asked receipt-shaped:
10493
+ header Workit decision: <purpose>, the same label repeated in the question
10494
+ text (some host UIs do not render headers), exactly two options approved and
10495
+ rejected; ask once, never re-ask to mint a receipt. task.close {outcome,
10493
10496
  summary, decisionIds}. A completed native subagent run stops its bound worker
10494
10497
  by itself; if a worker strands in cancelling with its run verifiably over,
10495
10498
  repeat worker.cancel {reason} to confirm the stop. Check and review evidence
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,14 +1,18 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@brainervirus/workit-codex",
3
- "version": "1.0.0",
3
+ "version": "1.0.2",
4
4
  "private": false,
5
- "description": "Workit Codex CLI and desktop plugin",
5
+ "description": "Workit Codex CLI/desktop plugin — shared MCP transport, hooks, and fourteen method skills",
6
6
  "keywords": [
7
- "agent",
7
+ "agentic-coding",
8
+ "ai-agents",
8
9
  "codex",
9
10
  "mcp",
11
+ "model-context-protocol",
12
+ "plugin",
10
13
  "workflow"
11
14
  ],
15
+ "homepage": "https://github.com/BrainerVirus/workit#readme",
12
16
  "license": "MIT",
13
17
  "repository": {
14
18
  "type": "git",
@@ -34,8 +38,8 @@
34
38
  "build": "bun scripts/build.ts"
35
39
  },
36
40
  "dependencies": {
37
- "@brainervirus/workit-core": "^1.0.0",
38
- "@brainervirus/workit-mcp": "^1.0.0"
41
+ "@brainervirus/workit-core": "^1.0.2",
42
+ "@brainervirus/workit-mcp": "^1.0.2"
39
43
  },
40
44
  "engines": {
41
45
  "node": ">=24"
@@ -31,3 +31,8 @@ selects requirements; do not wait for a rule that can only exist after assess.
31
31
 
32
32
  PR merged per settings, or a status brief (frontier state, next action) when
33
33
  blocked on the human. Record evidence for fixes, findings for blockers.
34
+
35
+ A squash merge creates a new commit on the base branch, so the pre-merge
36
+ candidate identity changes: re-record verification and review evidence against
37
+ the merged commit before `task.close`, or the close will report unsatisfied
38
+ requirements.
@@ -28,8 +28,10 @@ selects requirements; do not wait for a rule that can only exist after assess.
28
28
  dependency order and recompute after every answer — a wall of questions is
29
29
  not an interview.
30
30
  4. Funnel every resolution: the moment a consequential choice settles, bind it
31
- with a receipt-shaped question (header `Workit decision: <purpose>`, exactly
32
- `approved`/`rejected`, the approved description carrying the exact content).
31
+ with a receipt-shaped question — header `Workit decision: <purpose>` and the
32
+ same label repeated in the question text (host UIs may not render headers) —
33
+ exactly `approved`/`rejected` options, the approved description carrying the
34
+ exact content.
33
35
  If the user already stated the choice in conversation and no receipt can be
34
36
  minted, record it in task progress and reassess so the settled requirement
35
37
  retires — never re-ask to mint a receipt, and never leave it for close to
@@ -20,11 +20,14 @@ selects requirements; do not wait for a rule that can only exist after assess.
20
20
  blockers. Never trust memory across an interruption.
21
21
  2. Classify the steering:
22
22
  - same-task: fold into scope (reassess if facts changed), continue.
23
- - new-task: `task.start` + `policy.assess`; the parked task waits.
23
+ - new-task: `task.pause` the parked lead task, then `task.start` +
24
+ `policy.assess` for the new one. Keep exactly one active lead per
25
+ session: external actions bind to that single active task, and a second
26
+ active lead makes writer authority ambiguous.
24
27
  - quick-question: answer from the parked state, then resume.
25
28
  3. Handle it with the same rigor as the parked work (no drive-by edits).
26
29
  4. Re-anchor: one-line resume brief (where we were, what changed, what
27
- is next) before touching the parked work again.
30
+ is next), then `task.resume` the parked task before touching it again.
28
31
 
29
32
  ## Completion
30
33