@boyingliu01/xp-gate 0.8.9 → 0.8.10

package/plugins/claude-code/skills/sprint-flow/references/force-levels.md

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ AUTO-ESTIMATE 输出 → Force Levels 执行 → 自动升级机制（如触发
 
 | 场景 | DELPHI-GATE | Force Levels |
 |------|------------|-------------|
-| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥95% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
+| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥90% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
 | Phase 2 BUILD 入口 | **必须检查** `.sprint-state/delphi-reviewed.json` 中 `verdict=APPROVED` | 轻量/标准/复杂：通过对应强度的 delphi-review 生成该门禁文件 |
 | 轻量级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、1 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、1 轮、写入门禁文件 |
 | 标准级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、最多 2 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、最多 2 轮、写入门禁文件 |

package/plugins/claude-code/skills/sprint-flow/references/phase-3-review.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Web 前端项目额外增加：系统化 QA、视觉审计、性能基线。
 ## 调用 Skills
 
 **所有项目**:
-- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, >=95% consensus）
+- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, ≥90% consensus）
 - `test-specification-alignment` — 测试与 Spec 对齐验证
 - `browse` (gstack) — 浏览器自动化测试
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ delphi code-walkthrough 执行：
 - Round 1: 匿名独立评审（防止 anchoring bias）
 - Round 2: 交换意见，响应关切
 - Round 3: 最终立场（如需）
-- >=95% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
+- ≥90% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
 
 **如果 REQUEST_CHANGES**:
 - ⚠️ 暂停等待用户修复 Critical Issues + 处理 Major Concerns

package/plugins/claude-code/skills/test-specification-alignment/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 # SKILLS/TEST-SPECIFICATION-ALIGNMENT KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
 Test-Specification Alignment Engine — two-stage validation ensuring tests accurately reflect requirements and design specs.

package/plugins/opencode/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@boyingliu01/opencode-plugin",
-  "version": "0.8.9",
+  "version": "0.8.10",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "index.ts",
   "description": "XP-Gate quality gates + AI workflow skills for OpenCode",

package/plugins/opencode/skills/delphi-review/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # SKILLS/DELPHI-REVIEW KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
-Delphi Consensus Review — multi-round anonymous expert review (≥91% threshold, 3 experts from ≥2 providers, domestic models only). Supports design + code-walkthrough modes.
+Delphi Consensus Review — multi-round anonymous expert review (≥90% threshold, 3 experts from ≥2 providers, domestic models only). Supports design + code-walkthrough modes.
 
 ## STRUCTURE
 ```
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 
 ## CONVENTIONS
 - 3 experts anonymous in Round 1 (no cross-expert bias)
-- ≥91% consensus threshold (was 95%, lowered to 91%)
+- ≥90% consensus threshold (was 95%, now unified to 90%)
 - Max 5 rounds before forcing decision
 - Cross-provider required: experts from ≥2 different providers
 - Domestic models only: glm, kimi, minimax, qwen, deepseek
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 - Code-walkthrough skipped on main/master pushes (by design)
 
 ## ANTI-PATTERNS (THIS PROJECT)
-- Do NOT terminate before achieving true consensus (≥91%)
+- Do NOT terminate before achieving true consensus (≥90%)
 - Do NOT reveal other experts' opinions during Round 1
 - Do NOT accept partial agreement without resolution
 - Do NOT skip code-walkthrough when over thresholds (BLOCK + user decision)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 
 ## UNIQUE STYLES
 - Anonymous expert reviews (Round 1)
-- Statistical consensus measurement (≥91% threshold)
+- Statistical consensus measurement (≥90% threshold)
 - Two modes: design review + code-walkthrough
 - Pre-push integration: .code-walkthrough-result.json stores commit hash + verdict
 - Delphi guard in claude-code plugin: blocks Edit/Write before APPROVAL

package/plugins/opencode/skills/delphi-review/INSTALL.md

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The skill requires at least 2 experts for code changes, 3 for architecture decis
 | `experts.architecture` | Architecture reviewer configuration | Required |
 | `experts.technical` | Technical reviewer configuration | Required |
 | `experts.feasibility` | Feasibility reviewer configuration | Required for 3-expert mode |
-    | `consensus.threshold_percent` | Agreement threshold | 95 |
+    | `consensus.threshold_percent` | Agreement threshold | 90 |
 | `consensus.max_review_rounds` | Maximum review rounds | 5 |
 | `consensus.cross_provider_required` | Require different providers | true |
 

package/plugins/opencode/skills/delphi-review/SKILL.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 
 **In Scope:**
 - Multi-round anonymous expert consensus review (design + code-walkthrough modes)
-- 2-3 experts from different providers with statistical consensus (>= 91%)
+- 2-3 experts from different providers with statistical consensus (>= 90%)
 - Structured verdict: APPROVED / PASS_WITH_CAVEATS / REQUEST_CHANGES
 - Domestic models only (no Anthropic/OpenAI/Google)
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 1. **匿名性** — Round 1 专家互不知道对方意见
 2. **迭代** — 多轮直到共识，不是固定轮数
 3. **受控反馈** — 每轮看到其他专家意见
-4. **统计共识** — >=91% 一致才算共识
+4. **统计共识** — >=90% 一致才算共识
 
 ### 质量优先
 
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 
 | 阈值 | 说明 |
 |------|------|
-| **>=91%** | 推荐默认 |
+| **>=90%** | 推荐默认 |
 | 100% | 完全一致（更严格） |
 
 ---
@@ -105,14 +105,14 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 ```
 Phase 0: 准备 → Round 1: 匿名独立评审 → 共识检查
     │
-    ├─ 一致 + >=91% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
+    ├─ 一致 + >=90% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
     │
-    └─ 不一致 或 <91% 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
+    └─ 不一致 或 <90% 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
           │
           ▼
        Round 2: 交换意见 → 共识检查
           │
-          ├─ 一致 + >=91% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
+          ├─ 一致 + >=90% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
           │
           └─ 仍分歧 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
                 │
@@ -248,11 +248,11 @@ This skill activates on any request for multi-expert review. Common triggers:
 2. **Dispatch anonymous experts** - 2-3 experts from ≥2 different domestic model providers
 3. **Collect Round 1 independent reviews** - Anonymous, no cross-expert bias
 4. **Synthesize feedback** - Measure consensus, identify disagreements
-5. **Run Round 2+ until consensus** - Exchange opinions, iterate until ≥91% agreement
+5. **Run Round 2+ until consensus** - Exchange opinions, iterate until ≥90% agreement
 6. **Block on unresolved Critical/Major** - Zero-tolerance: all Critical/Major must be resolved
 7. **Emit verdict** - APPROVED (with specification.yaml) or REQUEST_CHANGES (fix + re-review)
 
-**Consensus threshold:** ≥91% (project standard for Delphi review approval)
+**Consensus threshold:** ≥90% (project standard for Delphi review approval)
 **Model policy:** Domestic models only (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax). Foreign models (Anthropic/OpenAI/Google) forbidden.
 
 ---
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 - [ ] Round 2+ 完成（交换意见 / 最终立场）
 
 **CRITICAL — 共识验证:**
-- [ ] 问题共识比例 >=91%
+- [ ] 问题共识比例 >=90%
 - [ ] 所有 Critical Issues 已解决
 - [ ] 所有 Major Concerns 已处理
 
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 | 只处理 Critical，忽略 Major | 零容忍：Critical/Major 全部必须处理，不可跳过或降级 |
 | 单专家自评 | 至少 2 位不同 provider 的专家 |
 | 用户说"时间紧急"就跳过 | 评审是投资不是开销，跳过后期返工成本更高 |
-| "专家几乎一致"就通过 | "几乎" = 不一致，继续到 >=91% |
+| "专家几乎一致"就通过 | "几乎" = 不一致，继续到 >=90% |
 | 使用 Anthropic/GPT/Gemini 等国外昂贵模型 | 必须使用国产开源模型（DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax） |
 | 三个专家使用同一厂家模型 | 必须来自至少 2 家不同厂家 |
 
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 | "这只是小变更" | 所有变更都需要评审 |
 | "Round 1 就够了" | 不够，必须多轮直到共识 |
 | "生成报告就完成了" | APPROVED 才算完成 |
-| "2/3 同意就是共识" | 还要检查问题共识比例 >=91% |
+| "2/3 同意就是共识" | 还要检查问题共识比例 >=90% |
 
 ---
 
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 
 **Delphi 评审完成的唯一标准：**
 1. ✅ 所有专家裁决 APPROVED
-2. ✅ 问题共识 >=91%
+2. ✅ 问题共识 >=90%
 3. ✅ 所有 Critical Issues 已修复验证
 4. ✅ 所有 Major Concerns 已处理
 5. ✅ 共识报告已生成

package/plugins/opencode/skills/delphi-review/references/code-walkthrough.md

@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ IF 任何检查失败:
 | `confidence` | number | 整体置信度 (1-10) |
 | `experts` | array | 专家评审结果 |
 | `issues` | array | 未解决的问题（如有） |
-| `consensus_ratio` | number | 问题共识比例 (≥0.95 为共识) |
+| `consensus_ratio` | number | 问题共识比例 (≥0.90 为共识) |
 
 **有效期机制**：
 

package/plugins/opencode/skills/sprint-flow/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # SKILLS/SPRINT-FLOW KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
-**11-phase** development pipeline: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP. Phase 2 default build mode is **ralph-loop** (REQ-level iteration, 40-67% token savings vs parallel). HARD-GATE in Phase 1: design must pass Delphi review (≥91% consensus) before any coding.
+**11-phase** development pipeline: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP. Phase 2 default build mode is **ralph-loop** (REQ-level iteration, 40-67% token savings vs parallel). HARD-GATE in Phase 1: design must pass Delphi review (≥90% consensus) before any coding.
 
 > **Doc drift**: README/CAPABILITIES still describe a "7-phase" pipeline. The canonical 11-phase model lives in `SKILL.md` and is what actually executes. See root `AGENTS.md` → "Known Drift" #4.
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 | -1 | ISOLATE | Isolate working tree / worktree creation | — |
 | -0.5 | AUTO-ESTIMATE | Sizing pass; emits estimate template | — |
 | 0 | THINK | brainstorming → CONTEXT.md + ADR | — |
-| 1 | PLAN | autoplan → delphi-review → specification.yaml | **HARD-GATE**: design must reach ≥91% Delphi consensus |
+| 1 | PLAN | autoplan → delphi-review → specification.yaml | **HARD-GATE**: design must reach ≥90% Delphi consensus |
 | 2 | BUILD | ralph-loop (REQ-level, default) + TDD + test-spec-alignment | — |
 | 3 | REVIEW | code-walkthrough + QA + benchmark | — |
 | 4 | USER ACCEPTANCE | Manual verification | — |
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 
 ## CONVENTIONS
 - **ralph-loop is Phase 2 default**. Each REQ runs in a clean context (no linear accumulation), saving 40-67% tokens vs parallel mode.
-- **delphi-review HARD-GATE in Phase 1**: design must reach ≥91% consensus across ≥2 model providers, domestic models only. Unapproved → BLOCK coding.
+- **delphi-review HARD-GATE in Phase 1**: design must reach ≥90% consensus across ≥2 model providers, domestic models only. Unapproved → BLOCK coding.
 - **`learn` is called twice**: once per REQ in Phase 2 (ralph-loop internal, `progress.log` permanent/contextual classification) and once in Phase 5 (Sprint-level retro).
 - **Phase isolation**: each phase has explicit entry/exit criteria documented in its `references/phase-*.md` file.
 - **Emergent Requirements** discovered in Phase 4 (USER ACCEPTANCE) are explicitly captured via `templates/emergent-issues-template.md` — never silently merged.
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 - Do NOT enter Phase 1 (PLAN) without completing Phase 0 (THINK).
 - Do NOT implement before design is APPROVED — Phase 1 must reach Delphi consensus first.
 - Do NOT merge an Emergent Requirement into the original Sprint silently — capture it via the template.
-- Do NOT terminate Delphi review before ≥91% consensus or 5 rounds, whichever first.
+- Do NOT terminate Delphi review before ≥90% consensus or 5 rounds, whichever first.
 
 ## UNIQUE STYLES
 - **11 phases** including negative-numbered pre-phases (-1, -0.5) — intentional, captures the work that happens before "real" coding starts.

package/plugins/opencode/skills/sprint-flow/SKILL.md

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → [GITHOOKS-GATE] → BUILD → R
 ```
 
 **Hard Gates**:
-- **Phase 0→1**: Design must be APPROVED by delphi-review (≥91% consensus)
+- **Phase 0→1**: Design must be APPROVED by delphi-review (≥90% consensus)
 - **Phase 1→2**: GITHOOKS-GATE (hooks must be installed) + DELPHI-GATE (spec must be APPROVED)
 - **Phase 4→5**: User acceptance must be completed (mandatory manual step)
 - **Phase 5→6**: feedback-log.md must exist (HARD-GATE)

package/plugins/opencode/skills/sprint-flow/references/force-levels.md

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ AUTO-ESTIMATE 输出 → Force Levels 执行 → 自动升级机制（如触发
 
 | 场景 | DELPHI-GATE | Force Levels |
 |------|------------|-------------|
-| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥95% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
+| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥90% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
 | Phase 2 BUILD 入口 | **必须检查** `.sprint-state/delphi-reviewed.json` 中 `verdict=APPROVED` | 轻量/标准/复杂：通过对应强度的 delphi-review 生成该门禁文件 |
 | 轻量级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、1 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、1 轮、写入门禁文件 |
 | 标准级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、最多 2 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、最多 2 轮、写入门禁文件 |

package/plugins/opencode/skills/sprint-flow/references/phase-3-review.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Web 前端项目额外增加：系统化 QA、视觉审计、性能基线。
 ## 调用 Skills
 
 **所有项目**:
-- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, >=95% consensus）
+- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, ≥90% consensus）
 - `test-specification-alignment` — 测试与 Spec 对齐验证
 - `browse` (gstack) — 浏览器自动化测试
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ delphi code-walkthrough 执行：
 - Round 1: 匿名独立评审（防止 anchoring bias）
 - Round 2: 交换意见，响应关切
 - Round 3: 最终立场（如需）
-- >=95% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
+- ≥90% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
 
 **如果 REQUEST_CHANGES**:
 - ⚠️ 暂停等待用户修复 Critical Issues + 处理 Major Concerns

package/plugins/opencode/skills/test-specification-alignment/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 # SKILLS/TEST-SPECIFICATION-ALIGNMENT KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
 Test-Specification Alignment Engine — two-stage validation ensuring tests accurately reflect requirements and design specs.

package/plugins/qoder/plugin.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "name": "xp-gate",
   "version": "0.8.8",
   "displayName": "XP-Gate",
-  "description": "Extreme Programming quality gates + AI workflow skills for Qoder. Includes 10 quality gates (Gate 0-9), Sprint Flow (11 phases), and Delphi multi-expert review (>=91% consensus).",
+  "description": "Extreme Programming quality gates + AI workflow skills for Qoder. Includes 10 quality gates (Gate 0-9), Sprint Flow (11 phases), and Delphi multi-expert review (>=90% consensus).",
   "author": {
     "name": "boyingliu01"
   },

package/plugins/qoder/skills/delphi-review/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # SKILLS/DELPHI-REVIEW KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
-Delphi Consensus Review — multi-round anonymous expert review (≥91% threshold, 3 experts from ≥2 providers, domestic models only). Supports design + code-walkthrough modes.
+Delphi Consensus Review — multi-round anonymous expert review (≥90% threshold, 3 experts from ≥2 providers, domestic models only). Supports design + code-walkthrough modes.
 
 ## STRUCTURE
 ```
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 
 ## CONVENTIONS
 - 3 experts anonymous in Round 1 (no cross-expert bias)
-- ≥91% consensus threshold (was 95%, lowered to 91%)
+- ≥90% consensus threshold (was 95%, now unified to 90%)
 - Max 5 rounds before forcing decision
 - Cross-provider required: experts from ≥2 different providers
 - Domestic models only: glm, kimi, minimax, qwen, deepseek
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 - Code-walkthrough skipped on main/master pushes (by design)
 
 ## ANTI-PATTERNS (THIS PROJECT)
-- Do NOT terminate before achieving true consensus (≥91%)
+- Do NOT terminate before achieving true consensus (≥90%)
 - Do NOT reveal other experts' opinions during Round 1
 - Do NOT accept partial agreement without resolution
 - Do NOT skip code-walkthrough when over thresholds (BLOCK + user decision)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ skills/delphi-review/
 
 ## UNIQUE STYLES
 - Anonymous expert reviews (Round 1)
-- Statistical consensus measurement (≥91% threshold)
+- Statistical consensus measurement (≥90% threshold)
 - Two modes: design review + code-walkthrough
 - Pre-push integration: .code-walkthrough-result.json stores commit hash + verdict
 - Delphi guard in claude-code plugin: blocks Edit/Write before APPROVAL

package/plugins/qoder/skills/delphi-review/INSTALL.md

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The skill requires at least 2 experts for code changes, 3 for architecture decis
 | `experts.architecture` | Architecture reviewer configuration | Required |
 | `experts.technical` | Technical reviewer configuration | Required |
 | `experts.feasibility` | Feasibility reviewer configuration | Required for 3-expert mode |
-    | `consensus.threshold_percent` | Agreement threshold | 95 |
+    | `consensus.threshold_percent` | Agreement threshold | 90 |
 | `consensus.max_review_rounds` | Maximum review rounds | 5 |
 | `consensus.cross_provider_required` | Require different providers | true |
 

package/plugins/qoder/skills/delphi-review/SKILL.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 
 **In Scope:**
 - Multi-round anonymous expert consensus review (design + code-walkthrough modes)
-- 2-3 experts from different providers with statistical consensus (>= 91%)
+- 2-3 experts from different providers with statistical consensus (>= 90%)
 - Structured verdict: APPROVED / PASS_WITH_CAVEATS / REQUEST_CHANGES
 - Domestic models only (no Anthropic/OpenAI/Google)
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 1. **匿名性** — Round 1 专家互不知道对方意见
 2. **迭代** — 多轮直到共识，不是固定轮数
 3. **受控反馈** — 每轮看到其他专家意见
-4. **统计共识** — >=91% 一致才算共识
+4. **统计共识** — >=90% 一致才算共识
 
 ### 质量优先
 
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 
 | 阈值 | 说明 |
 |------|------|
-| **>=91%** | 推荐默认 |
+| **>=90%** | 推荐默认 |
 | 100% | 完全一致（更严格） |
 
 ---
@@ -105,14 +105,14 @@ description: "Use when asked to review a design, plan, or architecture; before i
 ```
 Phase 0: 准备 → Round 1: 匿名独立评审 → 共识检查
     │
-    ├─ 一致 + >=91% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
+    ├─ 一致 + >=90% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
     │
-    └─ 不一致 或 <91% 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
+    └─ 不一致 或 <90% 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
           │
           ▼
        Round 2: 交换意见 → 共识检查
           │
-          ├─ 一致 + >=91% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
+          ├─ 一致 + >=90% + APPROVED → ✅ 完成
           │
           └─ 仍分歧 或 REQUEST_CHANGES
                 │
@@ -248,11 +248,11 @@ This skill activates on any request for multi-expert review. Common triggers:
 2. **Dispatch anonymous experts** - 2-3 experts from ≥2 different domestic model providers
 3. **Collect Round 1 independent reviews** - Anonymous, no cross-expert bias
 4. **Synthesize feedback** - Measure consensus, identify disagreements
-5. **Run Round 2+ until consensus** - Exchange opinions, iterate until ≥91% agreement
+5. **Run Round 2+ until consensus** - Exchange opinions, iterate until ≥90% agreement
 6. **Block on unresolved Critical/Major** - Zero-tolerance: all Critical/Major must be resolved
 7. **Emit verdict** - APPROVED (with specification.yaml) or REQUEST_CHANGES (fix + re-review)
 
-**Consensus threshold:** ≥91% (project standard for Delphi review approval)
+**Consensus threshold:** ≥90% (project standard for Delphi review approval)
 **Model policy:** Domestic models only (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax). Foreign models (Anthropic/OpenAI/Google) forbidden.
 
 ---
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 - [ ] Round 2+ 完成（交换意见 / 最终立场）
 
 **CRITICAL — 共识验证:**
-- [ ] 问题共识比例 >=91%
+- [ ] 问题共识比例 >=90%
 - [ ] 所有 Critical Issues 已解决
 - [ ] 所有 Major Concerns 已处理
 
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 | 只处理 Critical，忽略 Major | 零容忍：Critical/Major 全部必须处理，不可跳过或降级 |
 | 单专家自评 | 至少 2 位不同 provider 的专家 |
 | 用户说"时间紧急"就跳过 | 评审是投资不是开销，跳过后期返工成本更高 |
-| "专家几乎一致"就通过 | "几乎" = 不一致，继续到 >=91% |
+| "专家几乎一致"就通过 | "几乎" = 不一致，继续到 >=90% |
 | 使用 Anthropic/GPT/Gemini 等国外昂贵模型 | 必须使用国产开源模型（DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax） |
 | 三个专家使用同一厂家模型 | 必须来自至少 2 家不同厂家 |
 
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 | "这只是小变更" | 所有变更都需要评审 |
 | "Round 1 就够了" | 不够，必须多轮直到共识 |
 | "生成报告就完成了" | APPROVED 才算完成 |
-| "2/3 同意就是共识" | 还要检查问题共识比例 >=91% |
+| "2/3 同意就是共识" | 还要检查问题共识比例 >=90% |
 
 ---
 
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ Every review round output MUST follow this exact JSON structure for design mode:
 
 **Delphi 评审完成的唯一标准：**
 1. ✅ 所有专家裁决 APPROVED
-2. ✅ 问题共识 >=91%
+2. ✅ 问题共识 >=90%
 3. ✅ 所有 Critical Issues 已修复验证
 4. ✅ 所有 Major Concerns 已处理
 5. ✅ 共识报告已生成

package/plugins/qoder/skills/delphi-review/references/code-walkthrough.md

@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ IF 任何检查失败:
 | `confidence` | number | 整体置信度 (1-10) |
 | `experts` | array | 专家评审结果 |
 | `issues` | array | 未解决的问题（如有） |
-| `consensus_ratio` | number | 问题共识比例 (≥0.95 为共识) |
+| `consensus_ratio` | number | 问题共识比例 (≥0.90 为共识) |
 
 **有效期机制**：
 

package/plugins/qoder/skills/sprint-flow/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # SKILLS/SPRINT-FLOW KNOWLEDGE BASE
 
-**Generated:** 2026-06-11
-**Commit:** c18f82b
+**Generated:** 2026-06-14
+**Commit:** e215a50
 **Branch:** main
-**Version:** 0.8.9.0
+**Version:** 0.8.10.0
 
 ## OVERVIEW
-**11-phase** development pipeline: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP. Phase 2 default build mode is **ralph-loop** (REQ-level iteration, 40-67% token savings vs parallel). HARD-GATE in Phase 1: design must pass Delphi review (≥91% consensus) before any coding.
+**11-phase** development pipeline: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP. Phase 2 default build mode is **ralph-loop** (REQ-level iteration, 40-67% token savings vs parallel). HARD-GATE in Phase 1: design must pass Delphi review (≥90% consensus) before any coding.
 
 > **Doc drift**: README/CAPABILITIES still describe a "7-phase" pipeline. The canonical 11-phase model lives in `SKILL.md` and is what actually executes. See root `AGENTS.md` → "Known Drift" #4.
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 | -1 | ISOLATE | Isolate working tree / worktree creation | — |
 | -0.5 | AUTO-ESTIMATE | Sizing pass; emits estimate template | — |
 | 0 | THINK | brainstorming → CONTEXT.md + ADR | — |
-| 1 | PLAN | autoplan → delphi-review → specification.yaml | **HARD-GATE**: design must reach ≥91% Delphi consensus |
+| 1 | PLAN | autoplan → delphi-review → specification.yaml | **HARD-GATE**: design must reach ≥90% Delphi consensus |
 | 2 | BUILD | ralph-loop (REQ-level, default) + TDD + test-spec-alignment | — |
 | 3 | REVIEW | code-walkthrough + QA + benchmark | — |
 | 4 | USER ACCEPTANCE | Manual verification | — |
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 
 ## CONVENTIONS
 - **ralph-loop is Phase 2 default**. Each REQ runs in a clean context (no linear accumulation), saving 40-67% tokens vs parallel mode.
-- **delphi-review HARD-GATE in Phase 1**: design must reach ≥91% consensus across ≥2 model providers, domestic models only. Unapproved → BLOCK coding.
+- **delphi-review HARD-GATE in Phase 1**: design must reach ≥90% consensus across ≥2 model providers, domestic models only. Unapproved → BLOCK coding.
 - **`learn` is called twice**: once per REQ in Phase 2 (ralph-loop internal, `progress.log` permanent/contextual classification) and once in Phase 5 (Sprint-level retro).
 - **Phase isolation**: each phase has explicit entry/exit criteria documented in its `references/phase-*.md` file.
 - **Emergent Requirements** discovered in Phase 4 (USER ACCEPTANCE) are explicitly captured via `templates/emergent-issues-template.md` — never silently merged.
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ skills/sprint-flow/
 - Do NOT enter Phase 1 (PLAN) without completing Phase 0 (THINK).
 - Do NOT implement before design is APPROVED — Phase 1 must reach Delphi consensus first.
 - Do NOT merge an Emergent Requirement into the original Sprint silently — capture it via the template.
-- Do NOT terminate Delphi review before ≥91% consensus or 5 rounds, whichever first.
+- Do NOT terminate Delphi review before ≥90% consensus or 5 rounds, whichever first.
 
 ## UNIQUE STYLES
 - **11 phases** including negative-numbered pre-phases (-1, -0.5) — intentional, captures the work that happens before "real" coding starts.

package/plugins/qoder/skills/sprint-flow/SKILL.md

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: sprint-flow
+version: 1.0.0
 description: >
   One-Shot Sprint 自动流水线。单一入口，自动串联 Think → Plan → Build → 
   Review → Ship 流程。整合 brainstorming + autoplan + delphi-review + TDD +
@@ -12,6 +13,7 @@ description: >
   - "start sprint"
   - "一键开发"
   - "/sprint-flow"
+  触发后第一行输出: `Sprint Flow: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP`
   用法: /sprint-flow "[需求描述]"
   示例: /sprint-flow "开发访谈机器人，支持多轮对话"
   可选参数:
@@ -29,6 +31,24 @@ description: >
   --status: 查看当前 Sprint 进度看板（不执行任何阶段，仅读取 sprint-state.json 并渲染进度）
   Use when asked to "开发新功能", "实现 X", "start sprint", "一键开发", or "/sprint-flow" for end-to-end feature development.
 maturity: beta
+triggers:
+  - "/sprint-flow"
+  - "start sprint"
+  - "开发新功能"
+  - "实现 X"
+  - "一键开发"
+workflow_steps:
+  - "Phase -1: ISOLATE"
+  - "Phase -0.5: AUTO-ESTIMATE"
+  - "Phase 0: THINK"
+  - "Phase 1: PLAN"
+  - "Phase 2: BUILD"
+  - "Phase 3: REVIEW"
+  - "Phase 4: USER ACCEPTANCE"
+  - "Phase 5: FEEDBACK"
+  - "Phase 6: SHIP"
+  - "Phase 7: LAND"
+  - "Phase 8: CLEANUP"
 ---
 
 ## Triggers
@@ -227,7 +247,7 @@ ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → [GITHOOKS-GATE] → BUILD → R
 ```
 
 **Hard Gates**:
-- **Phase 0→1**: Design must be APPROVED by delphi-review (≥91% consensus)
+- **Phase 0→1**: Design must be APPROVED by delphi-review (≥90% consensus)
 - **Phase 1→2**: GITHOOKS-GATE (hooks must be installed) + DELPHI-GATE (spec must be APPROVED)
 - **Phase 4→5**: User acceptance must be completed (mandatory manual step)
 - **Phase 5→6**: feedback-log.md must exist (HARD-GATE)
@@ -236,6 +256,36 @@ ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → [GITHOOKS-GATE] → BUILD → R
 
 ## 各 Phase 调用的 Skills
 
+### ⚠️ 强制输出格式规范（Mandatory Output Format）
+
+**执行每个 Phase 时，必须以以下固定格式输出阶段标题**，不可省略、不可合并、不可替换：
+
+```markdown
+## Phase -1: ISOLATE (隔离)
+## Phase -0.5: AUTO-ESTIMATE (规模评估)
+## Phase 0: THINK (思考)
+## Phase 1: PLAN (规划)
+## Phase 2: BUILD (构建)
+## Phase 3: REVIEW (评审)
+## Phase 4: USER ACCEPTANCE (用户验收)
+## Phase 5: FEEDBACK (反馈)
+## Phase 6: SHIP (发布)
+## Phase 7: LAND (部署)
+## Phase 8: CLEANUP (清理)
+```
+
+**规则**：
+1. 每个 Phase **开始执行时必须首先输出**对应的 `## Phase X: NAME` 标题行（作为该 Phase 输出的第一行）
+2. **禁止省略** "Phase" 关键词（如不能只写 "ISOLATE" 或 "## -1"）
+3. **禁止合并**多个 Phase 的输出（每个 Phase 必须有独立标题）
+4. **格式必须精确匹配**：`## Phase ` + 数字 + `: ` + 大写英文名 + ` (中文名)`
+5. 跳过某个 Phase（如 `--resume-from build` 跳过了 -1, -0.5, 0, 1）时，不输出被跳过 Phase 的标题
+6. 触发 `/sprint-flow` 后，**第一行输出应包含工作流阶段概览**：
+
+```
+Sprint Flow: ISOLATE → AUTO-ESTIMATE → THINK → PLAN → BUILD → REVIEW → USER ACCEPTANCE → FEEDBACK → SHIP → LAND → CLEANUP
+```
+
 ### Phase -1: ISOLATE（git worktree 隔离）
 
 **执行时机**: `/sprint-flow` 启动后、Phase 0 THINK 之前。**自动执行**。

package/plugins/qoder/skills/sprint-flow/references/force-levels.md

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ AUTO-ESTIMATE 输出 → Force Levels 执行 → 自动升级机制（如触发
 
 | 场景 | DELPHI-GATE | Force Levels |
 |------|------------|-------------|
-| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥95% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
+| Phase 1 设计评审 | 3 专家、≥90% 共识、生成 specification.yaml | 不适用（设计阶段） |
 | Phase 2 BUILD 入口 | **必须检查** `.sprint-state/delphi-reviewed.json` 中 `verdict=APPROVED` | 轻量/标准/复杂：通过对应强度的 delphi-review 生成该门禁文件 |
 | 轻量级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、1 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、1 轮、写入门禁文件 |
 | 标准级评审 | 生成 `delphi-reviewed.json`（2 专家、最多 2 轮、2/2 批准） | 2 专家、最多 2 轮、写入门禁文件 |

package/plugins/qoder/skills/sprint-flow/references/phase-3-review.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Web 前端项目额外增加：系统化 QA、视觉审计、性能基线。
 ## 调用 Skills
 
 **所有项目**:
-- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, >=95% consensus）
+- `delphi-review --mode code-walkthrough` — 多专家匿名代码走查（2-3 domestic models, ≥90% consensus）
 - `test-specification-alignment` — 测试与 Spec 对齐验证
 - `browse` (gstack) — 浏览器自动化测试
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ delphi code-walkthrough 执行：
 - Round 1: 匿名独立评审（防止 anchoring bias）
 - Round 2: 交换意见，响应关切
 - Round 3: 最终立场（如需）
-- >=95% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
+- ≥90% 共识 + APPROVED 才通过
 
 **如果 REQUEST_CHANGES**:
 - ⚠️ 暂停等待用户修复 Critical Issues + 处理 Major Concerns