@boopkit/cli 0.6.7 → 0.6.8

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ A profile is where a project starts. Today there's one; more will follow as the
73
73
 
74
74
  Full-stack web application — Express + Handlebars + Tailwind CSS + PostgreSQL via Prisma, deployable to Heroku.
75
75
 
76
- Ships with application capabilities (`web`, `api`, `services`, `database`), development skills (`coding`, `testing`, `project-mgmt`, `product-design`, `skills`), and the `hello` demo capability.
76
+ Ships with application capabilities (`web`, `api`, `services`, `database`), development skills (`coding`, `testing`, `project-mgmt`, `product-design`, `skills`, `workflows`), and the `hello` demo capability.
77
77
 
78
78
  List profiles with `boop list profiles`.
79
79
 
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ Pick what the product needs. `boop add <name>` handles the wiring — npm depend
105
105
  | `product-design` | Product design skills — feature requirements, engineering design, documentation, design thought-partnership, and technical prose |
106
106
  | `ux` | UX judgement (purpose + visual) and the app-UI evaluation and delivery workflows |
107
107
  | `skills` | Skill-authoring and skill-discovery guidance for extending the skill library |
108
+ | `workflows` | Reusable end-to-end dev/writing workflows — feature, light, refactor, test-audit, architecture-audit, issue-sweep, website, design-handoff, knowledge-backfill |
108
109
 
109
110
  ### Skills each capability ships
110
111
 
@@ -116,11 +117,12 @@ Adding a capability installs its skills into your project's `skills/` directory.
116
117
  **Development capabilities (skills only — no runtime code)**
117
118
 
118
119
  - **`coding`** — boop-coding-beads-flow, boop-coding-development, boop-coding-commit-changes, boop-coding-review-changes, boop-coding-debugging
119
- - **`product-design`** — boop-product-design-engineering-design, boop-product-design-feature-documentation, boop-product-design-feature-requirements, boop-product-design-reference-integration, boop-product-design-thought-partnership, boop-writing-technical-prose
120
+ - **`product-design`** — boop-product-design-engineering-design, boop-product-design-feature-documentation, boop-product-design-feature-requirements, boop-product-design-reference-integration, boop-product-design-thought-partnership, boop-writing-technical-prose, boop-writing-documents
120
121
  - **`project-mgmt`** — boop-project-mgmt-beads-planning, boop-project-mgmt-engineering-planning
121
- - **`skills`** — boop-skill-authoring, boop-skills-discovery, boop-skills-agent-surface-design
122
+ - **`skills`** — boop-skill-authoring, boop-skills-discovery, boop-skills-agent-surface-design, boop-get-smart, boop-so-what
122
123
  - **`testing`** — boop-testing-tdd-light, boop-testing-testing-express-web, boop-testing-testing
123
124
  - **`ux`** — boop-ux-purpose-judgement, boop-ux-visual-judgement, boop-ux-eval-and-refine-workflow, boop-ux-app-ui-dev-workflow
125
+ - **`workflows`** — boop-feature-dev-workflow, boop-light-dev-workflow, boop-refactor-dev-workflow, boop-test-audit-workflow, boop-architecture-audit-workflow, boop-issue-sweep-workflow, boop-website-dev-workflow, boop-design-handoff-workflow, boop-knowledge-backfill
124
126
 
125
127
  **Application capabilities**
126
128
 
@@ -124,5 +124,12 @@
124
124
  "type": "application",
125
125
  "package": "@boopkit/cap-web",
126
126
  "requires": []
127
+ },
128
+ {
129
+ "name": "workflows",
130
+ "description": "Reusable end-to-end development and writing workflows",
131
+ "type": "development",
132
+ "package": "@boopkit/cap-workflows",
133
+ "requires": []
127
134
  }
128
135
  ]
@@ -7,13 +7,14 @@
7
7
  "@boopkit/cap-email": "0.4.2",
8
8
  "@boopkit/cap-hello": "0.4.0",
9
9
  "@boopkit/cap-noticeboard": "0.4.0",
10
- "@boopkit/cap-product-design": "0.6.4",
10
+ "@boopkit/cap-product-design": "0.6.5",
11
11
  "@boopkit/cap-project-mgmt": "0.4.4",
12
12
  "@boopkit/cap-services": "0.4.2",
13
- "@boopkit/cap-skills": "0.5.1",
14
- "@boopkit/cap-testing": "0.5.1",
13
+ "@boopkit/cap-skills": "0.5.2",
14
+ "@boopkit/cap-testing": "0.5.2",
15
15
  "@boopkit/cap-users": "0.4.3",
16
16
  "@boopkit/cap-ux": "0.2.2",
17
17
  "@boopkit/cap-web": "0.5.2",
18
+ "@boopkit/cap-workflows": "0.1.0",
18
19
  "@boopkit/logger": "0.4.0"
19
20
  }
package/docs/skills.md CHANGED
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Every capability ships **agent skills** — focused `SKILL.md` guides that `boop
22
22
  - **boop-product-design-reference-integration** — When you need to integrate new knowledge into the project's `reference/` directory after completing a feature, fixing a bug that changes behavior, or adding a capability.
23
23
  - **boop-product-design-thought-partnership** — When the user wants to think out loud through a design — a feature, a capability, a strategic direction — be a thought partner, not an implementer: hold the conversation at user-and-value altitude, honor uncertainty with hypotheses rather than pretend-decisions, and keep software-shaped concerns downstream of the user's lived problems.
24
24
  - **boop-writing-technical-prose** — When writing chat responses, summaries, bd issue bodies, specifications, specs, or any artifact a fresh reader will pick up cold, write grammatical conversational English. Avoid the agent-shorthand patterns that compress meaning at the cost of legibility.
25
+ - **boop-writing-documents** — When you need to write a document someone will read cold and act on — a proposal, strategy memo, analysis, recommendation, or status write-up — and want the discipline of the Amazon six-pager: narrative prose, a declared length budget, claims that carry their evidence, and the hard questions answered inside the document.
25
26
 
26
27
  ### `project-mgmt` — Project management with beads
27
28
 
@@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ Every capability ships **agent skills** — focused `SKILL.md` guides that `boop
33
34
  - **boop-skill-authoring** — When you need to add or update an agent skill in this project, follow this format and checklist.
34
35
  - **boop-skills-discovery** — When you pick up a non-trivial task, sweep the available skills for ones relevant to the work before you start, as a backstop for an issue that missed a breadcrumb.
35
36
  - **boop-skills-agent-surface-design** — When you design or audit tool surfaces (tools, schemas, APIs, conventions) that LLM agents will reach for, decide where to put the friction — adapt the system to the agent, or make the existing thing more discoverable. Last resort: prompt-engineer.
37
+ - **boop-get-smart** — When there is a recurring fault in your own behaviour during a chat, run the five whys to find its root cause, and agree a change with the operator that makes it less likely.
38
+ - **boop-so-what** — When the operator asks for the so-what, or says some version of 'thanks for the essay', compress what you just produced into three sentences about what they should care about.
36
39
 
37
40
  ### `testing` — Jest testing setup
38
41
 
@@ -47,6 +50,18 @@ Every capability ships **agent skills** — focused `SKILL.md` guides that `boop
47
50
  - **boop-ux-eval-and-refine-workflow** — When you are tasked with iteratively evaluating and improving an existing rendered page (discovery, not delivery), follow this workflow. Inner loop: capture → eval → recommend → implement → re-capture. Outer: knowledge integration.
48
51
  - **boop-ux-app-ui-dev-workflow** — When you are tasked with improving an existing app-side page (app UX, not marketing) end-to-end and the input is a target page rather than a written spec, follow this beads-issue-per-step workflow. Sibling to feature-dev-workflow but stripped of backend phases. The judgement lenses are the planning input.
49
52
 
53
+ ### `workflows` — Reusable end-to-end development and writing workflows
54
+
55
+ - **boop-feature-dev-workflow** — When you are tasked with building a feature end-to-end, follow this guidance.
56
+ - **boop-light-dev-workflow** — When you are extending an existing system (front-end, back-end, or full-stack) toward a goal — wiring something new from data and patterns that already exist, not building greenfield — follow this grounded flow: goal → investigate the real system → design → critique → decompose into one scoped epic + child issues → run them → close out. Loop-drivable via boop loop --work --flow; lighter than feature-dev-workflow.
57
+ - **boop-refactor-dev-workflow** — When you need to change a contract, cardinality, or shape that existing code already depends on — usually to make a feature buildable — follow this workflow instead of the feature workflow.
58
+ - **boop-test-audit-workflow** — Use when a set of tests is not testing the purpose of the code: mocks that verify data the test itself fed in, tests that exercise the platform rather than our code, or a stubbed seam where the integration is the actual risk. Also use when tests are so coupled to the shape of the implementation that they check a label, an exact string, or a call sequence rather than a behaviour. This workflow removes tests that cannot go red for a real reason, rewrites the ones that check a real goal at the wrong level, merges duplicates, and does not lose coverage. It explicitly does not target good tests merely because a coming change will make them need updating. The sibling of light-dev-workflow for reworking tests rather than building features.
59
+ - **boop-architecture-audit-workflow** — When you need to judge whether an area of shipped code is structurally healthy and decide what is worth fixing — undesired coupling, concerns bleeding across layers or domain boundaries, interfaces that are not composable because they are use-case specific or unparameterized — follow this process: scope one area and name the properties it should uphold → check the tests can catch you → measure before reading → grade every property and classify every finding against a named change → critique → operator gate → decompose → execute via refactor-dev-workflow. The sibling of test-audit-workflow for production code rather than tests. Not for finding bugs, and not for executing a structural change you have already decided on.
60
+ - **boop-issue-sweep-workflow** — When the bd queue has accumulated a noisy backlog of lingering P1/P2 items — paper-cuts, small refactors, dead code, cosmetic bugs, taxonomy drift — and you want to clear them autonomously in a sequence that supports the week's goals, follow this process: inventory → cluster by theme → pick a cluster with the operator → run autonomously in one sweep worktree → hand off for a single UAT pass → log. The work lands in a worktree for one operator review rather than on main; it arrives with no decisions left in it.
61
+ - **boop-website-dev-workflow** — When you are tasked with implementing website changes end-to-end (new pages, page rewrites, IA changes, content/CTA updates), follow this guidance.
62
+ - **boop-design-handoff-workflow** — When the operator hands off a design package (a README plus a drop-in view template and CSS) for a redesigned surface, follow this process: read the README, VERIFY its claims against the real code, surface any buried decision to the operator, file an issue, run it as a sub-agent (branch for UAT or merge-on-clean-visual-check), then close out with knowledge integration and archival. The README is confident; confidence is not correctness — verify before you run.
63
+ - **boop-knowledge-backfill** — When you need to integrate new knowledge from a set of specs or completed work that was not documented in reference at the time it shipped. This often happens when a feature is developed under a tight deadline and the team prioritizes shipping over documentation, or when work was done before the reference system was fully established.
64
+
50
65
  ## Application capabilities
51
66
 
52
67
  ### `api` — REST API with Express
@@ -85,4 +100,4 @@ Every capability ships **agent skills** — focused `SKILL.md` guides that `boop
85
100
 
86
101
  ---
87
102
 
88
- Standalone workflow skills (e.g. `boop-feature-dev-workflow`, `boop-light-dev-workflow`, `boop-issue-sweep-workflow`, `boop-design-handoff-workflow`) live in the repo's top-level `skills/` directory rather than in a capability package, so they are not listed above.
103
+ Boop-maintainer skills (e.g. `boop-capability-development`, `boop-downstream-harvest`, `boop-loop-conductor`, `boop-dolt-recovery`) live in the repo's top-level `skills/` directory rather than in a capability package, so they do not ship and are not listed above.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@boopkit/cli",
3
- "version": "0.6.7",
3
+ "version": "0.6.8",
4
4
  "description": "boop: the opinionated bootstrap for founder friendly, AI-first web apps - code plus agent skills, composable from day one.",
5
5
  "main": "dist/cli.js",
6
6
  "workspaces": [
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ defaultCapabilities:
13
13
  - project-mgmt
14
14
  - product-design
15
15
  - skills
16
+ - workflows
16
17
  # Demo
17
18
  - hello
18
19
  kernel: