@blxzer/cursor-trellis 0.2.5 → 0.2.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (31) hide show
  1. package/CHANGELOG.md +30 -0
  2. package/README.md +13 -4
  3. package/bin/smart-search.js +2 -2
  4. package/dist/commands/update.d.ts.map +1 -1
  5. package/dist/commands/update.js +2 -1
  6. package/dist/commands/update.js.map +1 -1
  7. package/dist/configurators/workflow.d.ts.map +1 -1
  8. package/dist/configurators/workflow.js +8 -2
  9. package/dist/configurators/workflow.js.map +1 -1
  10. package/dist/migrations/manifests/0.2.2.json +9 -0
  11. package/dist/migrations/manifests/0.2.4.json +9 -0
  12. package/dist/migrations/manifests/0.2.5.json +9 -0
  13. package/dist/migrations/manifests/0.2.6.json +9 -0
  14. package/dist/migrations/manifests/0.2.7.json +9 -0
  15. package/dist/templates/common/skills/brainstorm.md +164 -163
  16. package/dist/templates/markdown/index.d.ts +1 -0
  17. package/dist/templates/markdown/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  18. package/dist/templates/markdown/index.js +1 -0
  19. package/dist/templates/markdown/index.js.map +1 -1
  20. package/dist/templates/markdown/spec/guides/execution-strategy.md.txt +43 -0
  21. package/dist/templates/markdown/spec/guides/index.md.txt +102 -101
  22. package/dist/templates/trellis/config/execution-strategy-rules.json +31 -0
  23. package/dist/templates/trellis/index.d.ts +2 -0
  24. package/dist/templates/trellis/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  25. package/dist/templates/trellis/index.js +3 -0
  26. package/dist/templates/trellis/index.js.map +1 -1
  27. package/dist/templates/trellis/scripts/common/execution_strategy.py +268 -0
  28. package/dist/templates/trellis/scripts/common/task_store.py +1594 -1565
  29. package/dist/templates/trellis/scripts/task.py +906 -877
  30. package/dist/templates/trellis/workflow.md +805 -800
  31. package/package.json +2 -2
@@ -1,164 +1,165 @@
1
- # Trellis Brainstorm
2
-
3
- ## Non-Negotiable Interview Contract
4
-
5
- Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
6
-
7
- Ask the questions one at a time.
8
-
9
- ## Non-Negotiable Evidence Rule
10
-
11
- If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
12
-
13
- This is mandatory. Before asking the user a question, first check whether the answer is already available in code, tests, configs, docs, existing specs, or task history.
14
-
15
- Do not ask the user to confirm facts that the repository can answer. Ask only for product intent, preference, scope, risk tolerance, or decisions that remain ambiguous after inspection.
16
-
17
- ---
18
-
19
- Use this skill during Phase 1 planning to turn the user's request into clear requirements and planning artifacts.
20
-
21
- **Agent-capable platforms:** Do **not** use legacy Claude-only grill subagents as a hard gate. Complete **PRD Grill** (below) and **`trellis-micro-grill`** for blocking open questions before treating planning as ready for `design.md` / `implement.md` / `start-execution --check`.
22
-
23
- ## Preconditions
24
-
25
- Use this skill only after task-creation consent has been given and the user is ready to enter Trellis planning.
26
-
27
- If no task exists yet, create one:
28
-
29
- ```bash
30
- TASK_DIR=$(python ./.trellis/scripts/task.py create "<short task title>" --slug <slug>)
31
- ```
32
-
33
- Use a concise title from the user's request. Use a slug without a date prefix. `task.py create` adds the `MM-DD-` directory prefix automatically.
34
-
35
- `task.py create` creates the default `prd.md`. Update that file with the current understanding before asking follow-up questions.
36
-
37
- ## Two-phase planning overview
38
-
39
- | Phase | Name | User questions |
40
- | --- | --- | --- |
41
- | **A** | Discovery Before Questions + PRD draft | None until repo evidence is exhausted |
42
- | **B** | PRD Grill pass + Micro-grill unresolved | Only blocking business / risk / preference |
43
-
44
- External facts during Discovery or Research: load `smart-search-cli`; on CLI/doctor failure use Cursor WebSearch/WebFetch and persist under `{TASK}/research/` with `source: cursor-web-fallback`.
45
-
46
- ---
47
-
48
- ## Phase A — Discovery Before Questions
49
-
50
- Run **before** any user interview questions.
51
-
52
- Inspect and record in `prd.md` (sections: **Confirmed facts**, initial **Out of scope**, draft **Goal**):
53
-
54
- 1. **Code & tests** — relevant modules, fixtures, configs, error paths.
55
- 2. **Specs** — `.trellis/spec/` indexes and layer guides for touched packages.
56
- 3. **History** — archived tasks, active task research, developer journal when useful.
57
- 4. **Platform** — project platform hooks, agents, and skills (see `.trellis/spec/guides/cursor-subagent-policy.md` when using Cursor); shared `.agents/skills/` when behavior spans platforms.
58
- 5. **Parent/Child** — if multiple independent deliverables, note child split early in `prd.md`.
59
-
60
- Use retrieval per `.trellis/spec/guides/retrieval-daily-guide.md` (rg for literals, codegraph for structure, fast-context for semantic sweep).
61
-
62
- Dispatch **`trellis-research`** (writable Agent) when a topic needs a dedicated `{TASK}/research/<topic>.md` file; do **not** use a subagent for PRD Grill itself.
63
-
64
- ## Phase A — PRD draft
65
-
66
- After Discovery, flesh out `prd.md`:
67
-
68
- - goal and user value
69
- - confirmed facts (not restated as unverified requirements)
70
- - requirements
71
- - draft acceptance criteria
72
- - out of scope
73
- - open questions (tag **blocking** vs **nice-to-have**)
74
-
75
- For complex tasks, start `design.md` / `implement.md` skeletons only when boundaries are already clear from Discovery; otherwise wait until Phase B.
76
-
77
- ## Phase B — PRD Grill pass
78
-
79
- Treat `prd.md` (+ existing `design.md` fragments) as the **only document surface**. Run this checklist; fix the PRD in place (no new subagent):
80
-
81
- | # | Check |
82
- | --- | --- |
83
- | 1 | **Goal & user value** — single clear statement |
84
- | 2 | **Confirmed facts vs assumptions** — repo facts not listed as assumptions |
85
- | 3 | **Testable acceptance criteria** |
86
- | 4 | **Out of scope** explicit |
87
- | 5 | **Dependencies & sequencing** |
88
- | 6 | **Parent/Child & deliverables** when applicable |
89
- | 7 | **Research & external facts** — smart-search or documented fallback |
90
- | 8 | **Execution gate & artifacts** — `design.md` / `implement.md` / `verify.md` expectations |
91
- | 9 | **Durable Learning** — Phase 3.3 will need `update-spec` \| `no-update` \| `unsure` |
92
- | 10 | **Platform** — Cursor-first; PRD Grill in-session (no legacy grill-me / grill-with-docs subagent gate) |
93
- | 11 | **Risk & rollback** for complex tasks |
94
- | 12 | **Open questions** — only **blocking** strategic/preference items remain |
95
-
96
- ## Phase B — Micro-grill unresolved
97
-
98
- For each **blocking** open question after the checklist, embed the **`trellis-micro-grill` contract**:
99
-
100
- - exactly **one** question per message
101
- - **Simplified Chinese** for user-facing text
102
- - recommended answer + trade-off
103
- - **update `prd.md` after every answer** before the next question
104
-
105
- Stop micro-grill when no blocking open questions remain.
106
-
107
- Do not ask process questions ("should I search?"). Do not re-ask facts Discovery already confirmed.
108
-
109
- ## Question Rules (Phase B only)
110
-
111
- Each question must include:
112
-
113
- - the decision needed
114
- - why the answer matters
115
- - your recommended answer
116
- - the trade-off if the user chooses differently
117
-
118
- ## Artifact Rules
119
-
120
- `prd.md` records requirements and acceptance:
121
-
122
- - goal and user value
123
- - confirmed facts
124
- - requirements
125
- - acceptance criteria
126
- - out of scope
127
- - open questions that still block planning
128
-
129
- `design.md` records technical design for complex tasks:
130
-
131
- - architecture and boundaries
132
- - data flow and contracts
133
- - compatibility and migration notes
134
- - important trade-offs
135
- - operational or rollback considerations
136
-
137
- `implement.md` records execution planning for complex tasks:
138
-
139
- - ordered implementation checklist
140
- - validation commands
141
- - risky files or rollback points
142
- - follow-up checks before `task.py start-execution --check`
143
-
144
- Lightweight tasks may have only `prd.md`. Complex tasks must have `prd.md`, `design.md`, and `implement.md` before `task.py start-execution --check`.
145
-
146
- `implement.md` is not a replacement for `implement.jsonl`. Use JSONL files only for manifest-style spec and research references when the task needs them.
147
-
148
- ## Completion criteria — PRD Grill done
149
-
150
- Planning is ready for execution gate when **all** hold:
151
-
152
- - PRD Grill checklist (12 items) satisfied or explicitly N/A with rationale in `prd.md`
153
- - **No blocking** open questions in `prd.md`
154
- - Acceptance criteria are testable; out of scope is explicit
155
- - Complex tasks: `design.md` and `implement.md` present
156
- - User reviewed artifacts or explicitly approved proceeding
157
-
158
- Then proceed to Phase 1.2 Research (if needed), Phase 1.4 `task.py start-execution --check`, and implementation only after user approval.
159
-
160
- Do not start implementation until the user approves or asks for implementation.
161
-
162
- ## Legacy planning flow (summary)
163
-
1
+ # Trellis Brainstorm
2
+
3
+ ## Non-Negotiable Interview Contract
4
+
5
+ Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
6
+
7
+ Ask the questions one at a time.
8
+
9
+ ## Non-Negotiable Evidence Rule
10
+
11
+ If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
12
+
13
+ This is mandatory. Before asking the user a question, first check whether the answer is already available in code, tests, configs, docs, existing specs, or task history.
14
+
15
+ Do not ask the user to confirm facts that the repository can answer. Ask only for product intent, preference, scope, risk tolerance, or decisions that remain ambiguous after inspection.
16
+
17
+ ---
18
+
19
+ Use this skill during Phase 1 planning to turn the user's request into clear requirements and planning artifacts.
20
+
21
+ **Agent-capable platforms:** Do **not** use legacy Claude-only grill subagents as a hard gate. Complete **PRD Grill** (below) and **`trellis-micro-grill`** for blocking open questions before treating planning as ready for `design.md` / `implement.md` / `start-execution --check`.
22
+
23
+ ## Preconditions
24
+
25
+ Use this skill only after task-creation consent has been given and the user is ready to enter Trellis planning.
26
+
27
+ If no task exists yet, create one:
28
+
29
+ ```bash
30
+ TASK_DIR=$(python ./.trellis/scripts/task.py create "<short task title>" --slug <slug>)
31
+ ```
32
+
33
+ Use a concise title from the user's request. Use a slug without a date prefix. `task.py create` adds the `MM-DD-` directory prefix automatically.
34
+
35
+ `task.py create` creates the default `prd.md`. Update that file with the current understanding before asking follow-up questions.
36
+
37
+ ## Two-phase planning overview
38
+
39
+ | Phase | Name | User questions |
40
+ | --- | --- | --- |
41
+ | **A** | Discovery Before Questions + PRD draft | None until repo evidence is exhausted |
42
+ | **B** | PRD Grill pass + Micro-grill unresolved | Only blocking business / risk / preference |
43
+
44
+ External facts during Discovery or Research: load `smart-search-cli`; on CLI/doctor failure use Cursor WebSearch/WebFetch and persist under `{TASK}/research/` with `source: cursor-web-fallback`.
45
+
46
+ ---
47
+
48
+ ## Phase A — Discovery Before Questions
49
+
50
+ Run **before** any user interview questions.
51
+
52
+ Inspect and record in `prd.md` (sections: **Confirmed facts**, initial **Out of scope**, draft **Goal**):
53
+
54
+ 1. **Code & tests** — relevant modules, fixtures, configs, error paths.
55
+ 2. **Specs** — `.trellis/spec/` indexes and layer guides for touched packages.
56
+ 3. **History** — archived tasks, active task research, developer journal when useful.
57
+ 4. **Platform** — project platform hooks, agents, and skills (see `.trellis/spec/guides/cursor-subagent-policy.md` when using Cursor); shared `.agents/skills/` when behavior spans platforms.
58
+ 5. **Parent/Child** — if multiple independent deliverables, note child split early in `prd.md`.
59
+
60
+ Use retrieval per `.trellis/spec/guides/retrieval-daily-guide.md` (rg for literals, codegraph for structure, fast-context for semantic sweep).
61
+
62
+ Dispatch **`trellis-research`** (writable Agent) when a topic needs a dedicated `{TASK}/research/<topic>.md` file; do **not** use a subagent for PRD Grill itself.
63
+
64
+ ## Phase A — PRD draft
65
+
66
+ After Discovery, flesh out `prd.md`:
67
+
68
+ - goal and user value
69
+ - confirmed facts (not restated as unverified requirements)
70
+ - requirements
71
+ - draft acceptance criteria
72
+ - out of scope
73
+ - open questions (tag **blocking** vs **nice-to-have**)
74
+
75
+ For complex tasks, start `design.md` / `implement.md` skeletons only when boundaries are already clear from Discovery; otherwise wait until Phase B.
76
+
77
+ ## Phase B — PRD Grill pass
78
+
79
+ Treat `prd.md` (+ existing `design.md` fragments) as the **only document surface**. Run this checklist; fix the PRD in place (no new subagent):
80
+
81
+ | # | Check |
82
+ | --- | --- |
83
+ | 1 | **Goal & user value** — single clear statement |
84
+ | 2 | **Confirmed facts vs assumptions** — repo facts not listed as assumptions |
85
+ | 3 | **Testable acceptance criteria** |
86
+ | 4 | **Out of scope** explicit |
87
+ | 5 | **Dependencies & sequencing** |
88
+ | 6 | **Parent/Child & deliverables** when applicable |
89
+ | 7 | **Research & external facts** — smart-search or documented fallback |
90
+ | 8 | **Execution gate & artifacts** — `design.md` / `implement.md` / `verify.md` expectations |
91
+ | 9 | **Durable Learning** — Phase 3.3 will need `update-spec` \| `no-update` \| `unsure` |
92
+ | 10 | **Platform** — Cursor-first; PRD Grill in-session (no legacy grill-me / grill-with-docs subagent gate) |
93
+ | 11 | **Risk & rollback** for complex tasks |
94
+ | 12 | **Open questions** — only **blocking** strategic/preference items remain |
95
+
96
+ ## Phase B — Micro-grill unresolved
97
+
98
+ For each **blocking** open question after the checklist, embed the **`trellis-micro-grill` contract**:
99
+
100
+ - exactly **one** question per message
101
+ - **Simplified Chinese** for user-facing text
102
+ - recommended answer + trade-off
103
+ - **update `prd.md` after every answer** before the next question
104
+
105
+ Stop micro-grill when no blocking open questions remain.
106
+
107
+ Do not ask process questions ("should I search?"). Do not re-ask facts Discovery already confirmed.
108
+
109
+ ## Question Rules (Phase B only)
110
+
111
+ Each question must include:
112
+
113
+ - the decision needed
114
+ - why the answer matters
115
+ - your recommended answer
116
+ - the trade-off if the user chooses differently
117
+
118
+ ## Artifact Rules
119
+
120
+ `prd.md` records requirements and acceptance:
121
+
122
+ - goal and user value
123
+ - confirmed facts
124
+ - requirements
125
+ - acceptance criteria
126
+ - out of scope
127
+ - open questions that still block planning
128
+
129
+ `design.md` records technical design for complex tasks:
130
+
131
+ - architecture and boundaries
132
+ - data flow and contracts
133
+ - compatibility and migration notes
134
+ - important trade-offs
135
+ - operational or rollback considerations
136
+
137
+ `implement.md` records execution planning for complex tasks:
138
+
139
+ - ordered implementation checklist
140
+ - validation commands
141
+ - risky files or rollback points
142
+ - **Development Strategy Contract** (`execution_mode`, `isolation`, …): before finalizing, run `python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py suggest-execution-strategy <task-dir>` (or `--json`); reconcile suggestion with scope, then paste the approved YAML block into `implement.md`
143
+ - follow-up checks before `task.py start-execution --check`
144
+
145
+ Lightweight tasks may have only `prd.md`. Complex tasks must have `prd.md`, `design.md`, and `implement.md` before `task.py start-execution --check`.
146
+
147
+ `implement.md` is not a replacement for `implement.jsonl`. Use JSONL files only for manifest-style spec and research references when the task needs them.
148
+
149
+ ## Completion criteria — PRD Grill done
150
+
151
+ Planning is ready for execution gate when **all** hold:
152
+
153
+ - PRD Grill checklist (12 items) satisfied or explicitly N/A with rationale in `prd.md`
154
+ - **No blocking** open questions in `prd.md`
155
+ - Acceptance criteria are testable; out of scope is explicit
156
+ - Complex tasks: `design.md` and `implement.md` present
157
+ - User reviewed artifacts or explicitly approved proceeding
158
+
159
+ Then proceed to Phase 1.2 Research (if needed), Phase 1.4 `task.py start-execution --check`, and implementation only after user approval.
160
+
161
+ Do not start implementation until the user approves or asks for implementation.
162
+
163
+ ## Legacy planning flow (summary)
164
+
164
165
  The former single "Planning Flow" is now Phase A + B above. Steps 4–6 map to Phase B micro-grill and artifact updates.
@@ -28,5 +28,6 @@ export declare const guidesDurableLearningDecisionGuideContent: string;
28
28
  export declare const guidesRetrievalDailyGuideContent: string;
29
29
  export declare const guidesCursorSemanticComplianceContent: string;
30
30
  export declare const guidesCursorSubagentPolicyContent: string;
31
+ export declare const guidesExecutionStrategyContent: string;
31
32
  export declare const guidesCursorContextInjectionGuideContent: string;
32
33
  //# sourceMappingURL=index.d.ts.map
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- {"version":3,"file":"index.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/templates/markdown/index.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAqBH,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,EAAE,MAAuC,CAAC;AAGtE,eAAO,MAAM,qBAAqB,EAAE,MACK,CAAC;AAG1C,eAAO,MAAM,yBAAyB,QAAwB,CAAC;AAG/D,eAAO,MAAM,wBAAwB,EAAE,MACH,CAAC;AAQrC,eAAO,MAAM,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAEjC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,+BAA+B,EAAE,MAE7C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,+BAA+B,EAAE,MAE7C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,2BAA2B,EAAE,MAEzC,CAAC;AAGF,eAAO,MAAM,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAElC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,iCAAiC,EAAE,MAE/C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,yBAAyB,EAAE,MAEvC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,6BAA6B,EAAE,MAE3C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,kCAAkC,EAAE,MAEhD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,8BAA8B,EAAE,MAE5C,CAAC;AAGF,eAAO,MAAM,kBAAkB,EAAE,MAEhC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,oCAAoC,EAAE,MAElD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,mCAAmC,EAAE,MAEjD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,yCAAyC,EAAE,MACiB,CAAC;AAC1E,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,qCAAqC,EAAE,MAEnD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,iCAAiC,EAAE,MAE/C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,wCAAwC,EAAE,MACiB,CAAC"}
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"index.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/templates/markdown/index.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAqBH,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,EAAE,MAAuC,CAAC;AAGtE,eAAO,MAAM,qBAAqB,EAAE,MACK,CAAC;AAG1C,eAAO,MAAM,yBAAyB,QAAwB,CAAC;AAG/D,eAAO,MAAM,wBAAwB,EAAE,MACH,CAAC;AAQrC,eAAO,MAAM,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAEjC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,+BAA+B,EAAE,MAE7C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,+BAA+B,EAAE,MAE7C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,2BAA2B,EAAE,MAEzC,CAAC;AAGF,eAAO,MAAM,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAElC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,iCAAiC,EAAE,MAE/C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,yBAAyB,EAAE,MAEvC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,6BAA6B,EAAE,MAE3C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,kCAAkC,EAAE,MAEhD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,8BAA8B,EAAE,MAE5C,CAAC;AAGF,eAAO,MAAM,kBAAkB,EAAE,MAEhC,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,oCAAoC,EAAE,MAElD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,mCAAmC,EAAE,MAEjD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,yCAAyC,EAAE,MACiB,CAAC;AAC1E,eAAO,MAAM,gCAAgC,EAAE,MAE9C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,qCAAqC,EAAE,MAEnD,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,iCAAiC,EAAE,MAE/C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,8BAA8B,EAAE,MAE5C,CAAC;AACF,eAAO,MAAM,wCAAwC,EAAE,MACiB,CAAC"}
@@ -53,5 +53,6 @@ export const guidesDurableLearningDecisionGuideContent = readLocalTemplate("spec
53
53
  export const guidesRetrievalDailyGuideContent = readLocalTemplate("spec/guides/retrieval-daily-guide.md.txt");
54
54
  export const guidesCursorSemanticComplianceContent = readLocalTemplate("spec/guides/cursor-semantic-compliance.md.txt");
55
55
  export const guidesCursorSubagentPolicyContent = readLocalTemplate("spec/guides/cursor-subagent-policy.md.txt");
56
+ export const guidesExecutionStrategyContent = readLocalTemplate("spec/guides/execution-strategy.md.txt");
56
57
  export const guidesCursorContextInjectionGuideContent = readLocalTemplate("spec/guides/cursor-context-injection-guide.md.txt");
57
58
  //# sourceMappingURL=index.js.map
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- {"version":3,"file":"index.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/templates/markdown/index.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAEH,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,SAAS,CAAC;AACvC,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC;AAC1C,OAAO,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,UAAU,CAAC;AAEzC,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG,aAAa,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;AAClD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;AAEtC;;GAEG;AACH,SAAS,iBAAiB,CAAC,QAAgB;IACzC,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IAC3C,OAAO,YAAY,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC;AACzC,CAAC;AAED,gFAAgF;AAChF,8BAA8B;AAC9B,gFAAgF;AAEhF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,eAAe,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC;AAEtE,oDAAoD;AACpD,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qBAAqB,GAChC,iBAAiB,CAAC,oBAAoB,CAAC,CAAC;AAE1C,gCAAgC;AAChC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yBAAyB,GAAG,qBAAqB,CAAC;AAE/D,2DAA2D;AAC3D,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,wBAAwB,GACnC,iBAAiB,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC,CAAC;AAErC,gFAAgF;AAChF,0DAA0D;AAC1D,wEAAwE;AACxE,gFAAgF;AAEhF,uCAAuC;AACvC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,mBAAmB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC1D,2BAA2B,CAC5B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,+BAA+B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACtE,wCAAwC,CACzC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,+BAA+B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACtE,wCAAwC,CACzC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,2BAA2B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAClE,oCAAoC,CACrC,CAAC;AAEF,wCAAwC;AACxC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC3D,4BAA4B,CAC7B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,iCAAiC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACxE,0CAA0C,CAC3C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yBAAyB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAChE,kCAAkC,CACnC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,6BAA6B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACpE,sCAAsC,CACvC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,kCAAkC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACzE,2CAA2C,CAC5C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,8BAA8B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACrE,uCAAuC,CACxC,CAAC;AAEF,mBAAmB;AACnB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,kBAAkB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACzD,0BAA0B,CAC3B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oCAAoC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC3E,+CAA+C,CAChD,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,mCAAmC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC1E,8CAA8C,CAC/C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yCAAyC,GACpD,iBAAiB,CAAC,oDAAoD,CAAC,CAAC;AAC1E,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,0CAA0C,CAC3C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qCAAqC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC5E,+CAA+C,CAChD,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,iCAAiC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACxE,2CAA2C,CAC5C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,wCAAwC,GACnD,iBAAiB,CAAC,mDAAmD,CAAC,CAAC"}
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"index.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/templates/markdown/index.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAEH,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,SAAS,CAAC;AACvC,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,WAAW,CAAC;AAC1C,OAAO,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,UAAU,CAAC;AAEzC,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG,aAAa,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;AAClD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;AAEtC;;GAEG;AACH,SAAS,iBAAiB,CAAC,QAAgB;IACzC,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IAC3C,OAAO,YAAY,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC;AACzC,CAAC;AAED,gFAAgF;AAChF,8BAA8B;AAC9B,gFAAgF;AAEhF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,eAAe,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC;AAEtE,oDAAoD;AACpD,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qBAAqB,GAChC,iBAAiB,CAAC,oBAAoB,CAAC,CAAC;AAE1C,gCAAgC;AAChC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yBAAyB,GAAG,qBAAqB,CAAC;AAE/D,2DAA2D;AAC3D,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,wBAAwB,GACnC,iBAAiB,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC,CAAC;AAErC,gFAAgF;AAChF,0DAA0D;AAC1D,wEAAwE;AACxE,gFAAgF;AAEhF,uCAAuC;AACvC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,mBAAmB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC1D,2BAA2B,CAC5B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,+BAA+B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACtE,wCAAwC,CACzC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,+BAA+B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACtE,wCAAwC,CACzC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,2BAA2B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAClE,oCAAoC,CACrC,CAAC;AAEF,wCAAwC;AACxC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC3D,4BAA4B,CAC7B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,iCAAiC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACxE,0CAA0C,CAC3C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yBAAyB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAChE,kCAAkC,CACnC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,6BAA6B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACpE,sCAAsC,CACvC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,kCAAkC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACzE,2CAA2C,CAC5C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,yCAAyC,CAC1C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,8BAA8B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACrE,uCAAuC,CACxC,CAAC;AAEF,mBAAmB;AACnB,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,kBAAkB,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACzD,0BAA0B,CAC3B,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,oCAAoC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC3E,+CAA+C,CAChD,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,mCAAmC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC1E,8CAA8C,CAC/C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,yCAAyC,GACpD,iBAAiB,CAAC,oDAAoD,CAAC,CAAC;AAC1E,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACvE,0CAA0C,CAC3C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,qCAAqC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CAC5E,+CAA+C,CAChD,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,iCAAiC,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACxE,2CAA2C,CAC5C,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,8BAA8B,GAAW,iBAAiB,CACrE,uCAAuC,CACxC,CAAC;AACF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,wCAAwC,GACnD,iBAAiB,CAAC,mDAAmD,CAAC,CAAC"}
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1
+ # Execution strategy (execution_mode / isolation)
2
+
3
+ > **Purpose**: Suggest a Development Strategy Contract before you freeze `implement.md`, and align Phase 2 dispatch with the approved contract.
4
+
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ ## Two orthogonal dimensions
8
+
9
+ | Field | Question |
10
+ | --- | --- |
11
+ | `execution_mode` | **Who** implements and checks? (`inline` main session, `worker` trellis-implement/check agents, `child-task` Child worker) |
12
+ | `isolation` | **Where** are files edited? (`main-worktree` vs `git-worktree` for Child) |
13
+
14
+ Non-git repo roots do **not** force `inline` for code Full tasks; they only affect whether `git-worktree` / `prepare-child-worktree` is recommended.
15
+
16
+ ## Suggest (planning)
17
+
18
+ ```bash
19
+ python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py suggest-execution-strategy <task-dir>
20
+ python3 ./.trellis/scripts/task.py suggest-execution-strategy <task-dir> --json
21
+ ```
22
+
23
+ Run during brainstorm / before finalizing the YAML block in `implement.md`. Reconcile suggestion with product intent; the contract in `implement.md` is authoritative after approval.
24
+
25
+ ## Default policy (v1)
26
+
27
+ | Profile / signal | Suggested `execution_mode` | Suggested `isolation` |
28
+ | --- | --- | --- |
29
+ | Lite | (no contract) | — |
30
+ | Full + touches code | `worker` | `main-worktree` |
31
+ | Full + doc-only capabilities | `inline` | `main-worktree` |
32
+ | Parent / has children | `inline` | `main-worktree` |
33
+ | Child (`task.json` parent set) | `child-task` | `git-worktree` when git package root resolves; else `main-worktree` + WARN |
34
+
35
+ `touches_code` is deterministic: code `optional_capabilities`, `package`/`scope` path segments (`src`, `packages`, `scripts`, …), or Full with `design.md` and non-doc-only capabilities. Rules live in `.trellis/config/execution-strategy-rules.json`.
36
+
37
+ ## Drift warning (preflight)
38
+
39
+ `task.py start-execution <task> --check` prints `[execution-strategy] WARN` when the approved contract differs from a fresh suggestion. **Advisory only** — does not fail the gate.
40
+
41
+ ## Phase 2 alignment
42
+
43
+ See `workflow.md` Phase 2.1 / 2.2 tables: spawn `trellis-implement` / `trellis-check` only when `execution_mode: worker`.
@@ -1,101 +1,102 @@
1
- # Thinking Guides
2
-
3
- > **Purpose**: Expand your thinking to catch things you might not have considered.
4
-
5
- ---
6
-
7
- ## Why Thinking Guides?
8
-
9
- **Most bugs and tech debt come from "didn't think of that"**, not from lack of skill:
10
-
11
- - Didn't think about what happens at layer boundaries → cross-layer bugs
12
- - Didn't think about code patterns repeating → duplicated code everywhere
13
- - Didn't think about edge cases → runtime errors
14
- - Didn't think about future maintainers → unreadable code
15
-
16
- These guides help you **ask the right questions before coding**.
17
-
18
- ---
19
-
20
- ## Available Guides
21
-
22
- | Guide | Purpose | When to Use |
23
- |-------|---------|-------------|
24
- | [Durable Learning Decision Guide](./durable-learning-decision-guide.md) | Choose no-learning vs spec update vs learning artifact before archive | Finishing a task, parent review, or after `/trellis:break-loop` |
25
- | [Code Reuse Thinking Guide](./code-reuse-thinking-guide.md) | Identify patterns and reduce duplication | When you notice repeated patterns |
26
- | [Cross-Layer Thinking Guide](./cross-layer-thinking-guide.md) | Think through data flow across layers | Features spanning multiple layers |
27
- | [Retrieval daily guide](./retrieval-daily-guide.md) | rg / codegraph / fast-context / smart-search / pack / router | Planning, research, finish verification |
28
- | [Cursor subagent policy](./cursor-subagent-policy.md) | Task tool scenes, Agent mode, `model_policy: cursor-configured`, Cursor++ | Parent/Child dispatch, research/implement/check, parallel execution |
29
- | [Cursor context injection guide](./cursor-context-injection-guide.md) | Which Cursor channels reach the model (sessionStart bug, .cursor/rules, AGENTS.md) | "Agent ignored instructions" on Cursor, adding always-visible rules |
30
-
31
- ---
32
-
33
- ## Quick Reference: Thinking Triggers
34
-
35
- ### When to Think About Cross-Layer Issues
36
-
37
- - [ ] Feature touches 3+ layers (API, Service, Component, Database)
38
- - [ ] Data format changes between layers
39
- - [ ] Multiple consumers need the same data
40
- - [ ] You're not sure where to put some logic
41
- - [ ] You are adding an event kind, JSONL record, RPC payload, or config field
42
- - [ ] UI / command code starts casting raw payload fields directly
43
-
44
- → Read [Cross-Layer Thinking Guide](./cross-layer-thinking-guide.md)
45
-
46
- ### When to Think About Code Reuse
47
-
48
- - [ ] You're writing similar code to something that exists
49
- - [ ] You see the same pattern repeated 3+ times
50
- - [ ] You're adding a new field to multiple places
51
- - [ ] **You're modifying any constant or config**
52
- - [ ] **You're creating a new utility/helper function** ← Search first!
53
- - [ ] Two files read the same untyped payload field with local casts
54
- - [ ] Multiple branches update the same derived state from `kind` / `action`
55
-
56
- → Read [Code Reuse Thinking Guide](./code-reuse-thinking-guide.md)
57
-
58
- ### When Verifying AI Cross-Review Results
59
-
60
- - [ ] Reviewer claims "user input can be malicious" → Check the actual data source (internal manifest? user config? external API?)
61
- - [ ] Reviewer flags "missing validation" → Is the data from a trusted internal source?
62
- - [ ] Reviewer says "behavior change" → Read the code comments is it intentional design?
63
- - [ ] Reviewer identifies a "bug" in test Mentally delete the feature being tested does the test still pass? If yes → tautological test
64
-
65
- **Common AI reviewer false-positive patterns**:
66
- 1. **Trust boundary confusion**: Treating internal data (bundled JSON manifests) as untrusted external input
67
- 2. **Ignoring design comments**: Flagging intentional behavior documented in code comments as bugs
68
- 3. **Variable misreading**: Not tracing a variable to its actual definition (e.g., Map keyed by path vs name)
69
-
70
- **Verification rule**: Every CRITICAL/WARNING finding must be verified against the actual code before prioritizing. Budget ~35% false-positive rate for AI reviews.
71
-
72
- ---
73
-
74
- ## Pre-Modification Rule (CRITICAL)
75
-
76
- > **Before changing ANY value, ALWAYS search first!**
77
-
78
- ```bash
79
- # Search for the value you're about to change
80
- grep -r "value_to_change" .
81
- ```
82
-
83
- This single habit prevents most "forgot to update X" bugs.
84
-
85
- ---
86
-
87
- ## How to Use This Directory
88
-
89
- 1. **Before coding**: Skim the relevant thinking guide
90
- 2. **During coding**: If something feels repetitive or complex, check the guides
91
- 3. **After bugs**: Add new insights to the relevant guide (learn from mistakes)
92
-
93
- ---
94
-
95
- ## Contributing
96
-
97
- Found a new "didn't think of that" moment? Add it to the relevant guide.
98
-
99
- ---
100
-
101
- **Core Principle**: 30 minutes of thinking saves 3 hours of debugging.
1
+ # Thinking Guides
2
+
3
+ > **Purpose**: Expand your thinking to catch things you might not have considered.
4
+
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ ## Why Thinking Guides?
8
+
9
+ **Most bugs and tech debt come from "didn't think of that"**, not from lack of skill:
10
+
11
+ - Didn't think about what happens at layer boundaries → cross-layer bugs
12
+ - Didn't think about code patterns repeating → duplicated code everywhere
13
+ - Didn't think about edge cases → runtime errors
14
+ - Didn't think about future maintainers → unreadable code
15
+
16
+ These guides help you **ask the right questions before coding**.
17
+
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ ## Available Guides
21
+
22
+ | Guide | Purpose | When to Use |
23
+ |-------|---------|-------------|
24
+ | [Durable Learning Decision Guide](./durable-learning-decision-guide.md) | Choose no-learning vs spec update vs learning artifact before archive | Finishing a task, parent review, or after `/trellis:break-loop` |
25
+ | [Code Reuse Thinking Guide](./code-reuse-thinking-guide.md) | Identify patterns and reduce duplication | When you notice repeated patterns |
26
+ | [Cross-Layer Thinking Guide](./cross-layer-thinking-guide.md) | Think through data flow across layers | Features spanning multiple layers |
27
+ | [Retrieval daily guide](./retrieval-daily-guide.md) | rg / codegraph / fast-context / smart-search / pack / router | Planning, research, finish verification |
28
+ | [Cursor subagent policy](./cursor-subagent-policy.md) | Task tool scenes, Agent mode, `model_policy: cursor-configured`, Cursor++ | Parent/Child dispatch, research/implement/check, parallel execution |
29
+ | [Execution strategy](./execution-strategy.md) | `suggest-execution-strategy`, rules JSON, inline vs worker vs child-task | Writing `implement.md` contract, Phase 2 dispatch |
30
+ | [Cursor context injection guide](./cursor-context-injection-guide.md) | Which Cursor channels reach the model (sessionStart bug, .cursor/rules, AGENTS.md) | "Agent ignored instructions" on Cursor, adding always-visible rules |
31
+
32
+ ---
33
+
34
+ ## Quick Reference: Thinking Triggers
35
+
36
+ ### When to Think About Cross-Layer Issues
37
+
38
+ - [ ] Feature touches 3+ layers (API, Service, Component, Database)
39
+ - [ ] Data format changes between layers
40
+ - [ ] Multiple consumers need the same data
41
+ - [ ] You're not sure where to put some logic
42
+ - [ ] You are adding an event kind, JSONL record, RPC payload, or config field
43
+ - [ ] UI / command code starts casting raw payload fields directly
44
+
45
+ → Read [Cross-Layer Thinking Guide](./cross-layer-thinking-guide.md)
46
+
47
+ ### When to Think About Code Reuse
48
+
49
+ - [ ] You're writing similar code to something that exists
50
+ - [ ] You see the same pattern repeated 3+ times
51
+ - [ ] You're adding a new field to multiple places
52
+ - [ ] **You're modifying any constant or config**
53
+ - [ ] **You're creating a new utility/helper function** Search first!
54
+ - [ ] Two files read the same untyped payload field with local casts
55
+ - [ ] Multiple branches update the same derived state from `kind` / `action`
56
+
57
+ → Read [Code Reuse Thinking Guide](./code-reuse-thinking-guide.md)
58
+
59
+ ### When Verifying AI Cross-Review Results
60
+
61
+ - [ ] Reviewer claims "user input can be malicious" → Check the actual data source (internal manifest? user config? external API?)
62
+ - [ ] Reviewer flags "missing validation" → Is the data from a trusted internal source?
63
+ - [ ] Reviewer says "behavior change" → Read the code commentsis it intentional design?
64
+ - [ ] Reviewer identifies a "bug" in test → Mentally delete the feature being tested — does the test still pass? If yes → tautological test
65
+
66
+ **Common AI reviewer false-positive patterns**:
67
+ 1. **Trust boundary confusion**: Treating internal data (bundled JSON manifests) as untrusted external input
68
+ 2. **Ignoring design comments**: Flagging intentional behavior documented in code comments as bugs
69
+ 3. **Variable misreading**: Not tracing a variable to its actual definition (e.g., Map keyed by path vs name)
70
+
71
+ **Verification rule**: Every CRITICAL/WARNING finding must be verified against the actual code before prioritizing. Budget ~35% false-positive rate for AI reviews.
72
+
73
+ ---
74
+
75
+ ## Pre-Modification Rule (CRITICAL)
76
+
77
+ > **Before changing ANY value, ALWAYS search first!**
78
+
79
+ ```bash
80
+ # Search for the value you're about to change
81
+ grep -r "value_to_change" .
82
+ ```
83
+
84
+ This single habit prevents most "forgot to update X" bugs.
85
+
86
+ ---
87
+
88
+ ## How to Use This Directory
89
+
90
+ 1. **Before coding**: Skim the relevant thinking guide
91
+ 2. **During coding**: If something feels repetitive or complex, check the guides
92
+ 3. **After bugs**: Add new insights to the relevant guide (learn from mistakes)
93
+
94
+ ---
95
+
96
+ ## Contributing
97
+
98
+ Found a new "didn't think of that" moment? Add it to the relevant guide.
99
+
100
+ ---
101
+
102
+ **Core Principle**: 30 minutes of thinking saves 3 hours of debugging.