@blulotus/trellis 0.7.0

package/dist/templates/copilot/prompts/update-spec.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
+---
+description: "Trellis Copilot prompt: Update Code-Spec - Capture Executable Contracts"
+---
+
+# Update Code-Spec - Capture Executable Contracts
+
+When you learn something valuable (from debugging, implementing, or discussion), use this command to update the relevant code-spec documents.
+
+**Timing**: After completing a task, fixing a bug, or discovering a new pattern
+
+---
+
+## Code-Spec First Rule (CRITICAL)
+
+In this project, "spec" for implementation work means **code-spec**:
+- Executable contracts (not principle-only text)
+- Concrete signatures, payload fields, env keys, and boundary behavior
+- Testable validation/error behavior
+
+If the change touches infra or cross-layer contracts, code-spec depth is mandatory.
+
+### Mandatory Triggers
+
+Apply code-spec depth when the change includes any of:
+- New/changed command or API signature
+- Cross-layer request/response contract change
+- Database schema/migration change
+- Infra integration (storage, queue, cache, secrets, env wiring)
+
+### Mandatory Output (7 Sections)
+
+For triggered tasks, include all sections below:
+1. Scope / Trigger
+2. Signatures (command/API/DB)
+3. Contracts (request/response/env)
+4. Validation & Error Matrix
+5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
+6. Tests Required (with assertion points)
+7. Wrong vs Correct (at least one pair)
+
+---
+
+## When to Update Code-Specs
+
+| Trigger | Example | Target Spec |
+|---------|---------|-------------|
+| **Implemented a feature** | Added template download with giget | Relevant `backend/` or `frontend/` file |
+| **Made a design decision** | Used type field + mapping table for extensibility | Relevant code-spec + "Design Decisions" section |
+| **Fixed a bug** | Found a subtle issue with error handling | `backend/error-handling.md` |
+| **Discovered a pattern** | Found a better way to structure code | Relevant `backend/` or `frontend/` file |
+| **Hit a gotcha** | Learned that X must be done before Y | Relevant code-spec + "Common Mistakes" section |
+| **Established a convention** | Team agreed on naming pattern | `quality-guidelines.md` |
+| **New thinking trigger** | "Don't forget to check X before doing Y" | `guides/*.md` (as a checklist item, not detailed rules) |
+
+**Key Insight**: Code-spec updates are NOT just for problems. Every feature implementation contains design decisions and contracts that future AI/developers need to execute safely.
+
+---
+
+## Spec Structure Overview
+
+```
+.trellis/spec/
+├── backend/           # Backend coding standards
+�?  ├── index.md       # Overview and links
+�?  └── *.md           # Topic-specific guidelines
+├── frontend/          # Frontend coding standards
+�?  ├── index.md       # Overview and links
+�?  └── *.md           # Topic-specific guidelines
+└── guides/            # Thinking checklists (NOT coding specs!)
+    ├── index.md       # Guide index
+    └── *.md           # Topic-specific guides
+```
+
+### CRITICAL: Code-Spec vs Guide - Know the Difference
+
+| Type | Location | Purpose | Content Style |
+|------|----------|---------|---------------|
+| **Code-Spec** | `backend/*.md`, `frontend/*.md` | Tell AI "how to implement safely" | Signatures, contracts, matrices, cases, test points |
+| **Guide** | `guides/*.md` | Help AI "what to think about" | Checklists, questions, pointers to specs |
+
+**Decision Rule**: Ask yourself:
+
+- "This is **how to write** the code" �?Put in `backend/` or `frontend/`
+- "This is **what to consider** before writing" �?Put in `guides/`
+
+**Example**:
+
+| Learning | Wrong Location | Correct Location |
+|----------|----------------|------------------|
+| "Use `reconfigure()` not `TextIOWrapper` for Windows stdout" | �?`guides/cross-platform-thinking-guide.md` | �?`backend/script-conventions.md` |
+| "Remember to check encoding when writing cross-platform code" | �?`backend/script-conventions.md` | �?`guides/cross-platform-thinking-guide.md` |
+
+**Guides should be short checklists that point to specs**, not duplicate the detailed rules.
+
+---
+
+## Update Process
+
+### Step 1: Identify What You Learned
+
+Answer these questions:
+
+1. **What did you learn?** (Be specific)
+2. **Why is it important?** (What problem does it prevent?)
+3. **Where does it belong?** (Which spec file?)
+
+### Step 2: Classify the Update Type
+
+| Type | Description | Action |
+|------|-------------|--------|
+| **Design Decision** | Why we chose approach X over Y | Add to "Design Decisions" section |
+| **Project Convention** | How we do X in this project | Add to relevant section with examples |
+| **New Pattern** | A reusable approach discovered | Add to "Patterns" section |
+| **Forbidden Pattern** | Something that causes problems | Add to "Anti-patterns" or "Don't" section |
+| **Common Mistake** | Easy-to-make error | Add to "Common Mistakes" section |
+| **Convention** | Agreed-upon standard | Add to relevant section |
+| **Gotcha** | Non-obvious behavior | Add warning callout |
+
+### Step 3: Read the Target Code-Spec
+
+Before editing, read the current code-spec to:
+- Understand existing structure
+- Avoid duplicating content
+- Find the right section for your update
+
+```bash
+cat .trellis/spec/<category>/<file>.md
+```
+
+### Step 4: Make the Update
+
+Follow these principles:
+
+1. **Be Specific**: Include concrete examples, not just abstract rules
+2. **Explain Why**: State the problem this prevents
+3. **Show Contracts**: Add signatures, payload fields, and error behavior
+4. **Show Code**: Add code snippets for key patterns
+5. **Keep it Short**: One concept per section
+
+### Step 5: Update the Index (if needed)
+
+If you added a new section or the code-spec status changed, update the category's `index.md`.
+
+---
+
+## Update Templates
+
+### Mandatory Template for Infra/Cross-Layer Work
+
+```markdown
+## Scenario: <name>
+
+### 1. Scope / Trigger
+- Trigger: <why this requires code-spec depth>
+
+### 2. Signatures
+- Backend command/API/DB signature(s)
+
+### 3. Contracts
+- Request fields (name, type, constraints)
+- Response fields (name, type, constraints)
+- Environment keys (required/optional)
+
+### 4. Validation & Error Matrix
+- <condition> -> <error>
+
+### 5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
+- Good: ...
+- Base: ...
+- Bad: ...
+
+### 6. Tests Required
+- Unit/Integration/E2E with assertion points
+
+### 7. Wrong vs Correct
+#### Wrong
+...
+#### Correct
+...
+```
+
+### Adding a Design Decision
+
+```markdown
+### Design Decision: [Decision Name]
+
+**Context**: What problem were we solving?
+
+**Options Considered**:
+1. Option A - brief description
+2. Option B - brief description
+
+**Decision**: We chose Option X because...
+
+**Example**:
+\`\`\`typescript
+// How it's implemented
+code example
+\`\`\`
+
+**Extensibility**: How to extend this in the future...
+```
+
+### Adding a Project Convention
+
+```markdown
+### Convention: [Convention Name]
+
+**What**: Brief description of the convention.
+
+**Why**: Why we do it this way in this project.
+
+**Example**:
+\`\`\`typescript
+// How to follow this convention
+code example
+\`\`\`
+
+**Related**: Links to related conventions or specs.
+```
+
+### Adding a New Pattern
+
+```markdown
+### Pattern Name
+
+**Problem**: What problem does this solve?
+
+**Solution**: Brief description of the approach.
+
+**Example**:
+\`\`\`
+// Good
+code example
+
+// Bad
+code example
+\`\`\`
+
+**Why**: Explanation of why this works better.
+```
+
+### Adding a Forbidden Pattern
+
+```markdown
+### Don't: Pattern Name
+
+**Problem**:
+\`\`\`
+// Don't do this
+bad code example
+\`\`\`
+
+**Why it's bad**: Explanation of the issue.
+
+**Instead**:
+\`\`\`
+// Do this instead
+good code example
+\`\`\`
+```
+
+### Adding a Common Mistake
+
+```markdown
+### Common Mistake: Description
+
+**Symptom**: What goes wrong
+
+**Cause**: Why this happens
+
+**Fix**: How to correct it
+
+**Prevention**: How to avoid it in the future
+```
+
+### Adding a Gotcha
+
+```markdown
+> **Warning**: Brief description of the non-obvious behavior.
+>
+> Details about when this happens and how to handle it.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Interactive Mode
+
+If you're unsure what to update, answer these prompts:
+
+1. **What did you just finish?**
+   - [ ] Fixed a bug
+   - [ ] Implemented a feature
+   - [ ] Refactored code
+   - [ ] Had a discussion about approach
+
+2. **What did you learn or decide?**
+   - Design decision (why X over Y)
+   - Project convention (how we do X)
+   - Non-obvious behavior (gotcha)
+   - Better approach (pattern)
+
+3. **Would future AI/developers need to know this?**
+   - To understand how the code works �?Yes, update spec
+   - To maintain or extend the feature �?Yes, update spec
+   - To avoid repeating mistakes �?Yes, update spec
+   - Purely one-off implementation detail �?Maybe skip
+
+4. **Which area does it relate to?**
+   - [ ] Backend code
+   - [ ] Frontend code
+   - [ ] Cross-layer data flow
+   - [ ] Code organization/reuse
+   - [ ] Quality/testing
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before finishing your code-spec update:
+
+- [ ] Is the content specific and actionable?
+- [ ] Did you include a code example?
+- [ ] Did you explain WHY, not just WHAT?
+- [ ] Did you include executable signatures/contracts?
+- [ ] Did you include validation and error matrix?
+- [ ] Did you include Good/Base/Bad cases?
+- [ ] Did you include required tests with assertion points?
+- [ ] Is it in the right code-spec file?
+- [ ] Does it duplicate existing content?
+- [ ] Would a new team member understand it?
+
+---
+
+## Relationship to Other Commands
+
+```
+Development Flow:
+  Learn something �?/ �?Knowledge captured
+       �?                                 �?
+  / ←──────────────────── Future sessions benefit
+  (deep bug analysis)
+```
+
+- `/` - Analyzes bugs deeply, often reveals spec updates needed
+- `/` - Actually makes the updates (this command)
+- `/` - Reminds you to check if specs need updates
+
+---
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+> **Code-specs are living documents. Every debugging session, every "aha moment" is an opportunity to make the implementation contract clearer.**
+
+The goal is **institutional memory**:
+- What one person learns, everyone benefits from
+- What AI learns in one session, persists to future sessions
+- Mistakes become documented guardrails

package/dist/templates/cursor/agents/trellis-check.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+name: trellis-check
+description: Trellis quality check agent. Use this exact agent for Trellis task verification, check.jsonl context injection, and self-fixing code review. Do not use generic/default/generalPurpose agents for Trellis checks.
+tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
+---
+# Check Agent
+
+You are the Check Agent in the Trellis workflow.
+
+## Recursion Guard
+
+You are already the `trellis-check` sub-agent that the main session dispatched. Do the review and fixes directly.
+
+- Do NOT spawn another `trellis-check` or `trellis-implement` sub-agent.
+- If SessionStart context, workflow-state breadcrumbs, or workflow.md say to dispatch `trellis-implement` / `trellis-check`, treat that as a main-session instruction that is already satisfied by your current role.
+- Only the main session may dispatch Trellis implement/check agents. If more implementation work is needed, report that recommendation instead of spawning.
+
+## Trellis Context Loading Protocol
+
+Look for the `<!-- trellis-hook-injected -->` marker in your input above.
+
+- **If the marker is present**: task artifacts, spec, and research files have already been auto-loaded for you above. Proceed with the check work directly.
+- **If the marker is absent**: hook injection didn't fire (Windows + Claude Code, `--continue` resume, fork distribution, hooks disabled, etc.). Find the active task path from your dispatch prompt's first line `Active task: <path>`, then Read `<task-path>/check.jsonl`, each listed file, `<task-path>/prd.md`, `<task-path>/design.md` if present, and `<task-path>/implement.md` if present before doing the work.
+
+## Context
+
+Before checking, read:
+- `.trellis/spec/` - Development guidelines
+- Task `prd.md` - Requirements document
+- Task `design.md` - Technical design (if exists)
+- Task `implement.md` - Execution plan (if exists)
+- Pre-commit checklist for quality standards
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+1. **Get code changes** - Use git diff to get uncommitted code
+2. **Review task artifacts** - Check changes against prd.md, design.md if present, and implement.md if present Then verify the red-evidence trail: every completed `implement.md` slice records the red output it started from, and for `meta.kind=bug` the Phase 1.2 repro command has been re-run green against the full scenario. A slice claiming green with no recorded red is a finding, not a pass.
+3. **Check against specs** - Verify code follows guidelines
+4. **Self-fix** - Fix issues yourself, not just report them
+5. **Run verification** - typecheck and lint
+
+## Important
+
+**Fix issues yourself**, don't just report them.
+
+You have write and edit tools, you can modify code directly.
+
+---
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Step 1: Get Changes
+
+```bash
+git diff --name-only  # List changed files
+git diff              # View specific changes
+```
+
+### Step 2: Check Against Specs and Task Artifacts
+
+Read the task's prd.md, design.md if present, and implement.md if present, then read relevant specs in `.trellis/spec/` to check code:
+
+- Does it satisfy the task requirements
+- Does it follow the technical design and implementation plan when present
+- Does it follow directory structure conventions
+- Does it follow naming conventions
+- Does it follow code patterns
+- Are there missing types
+- Are there potential bugs
+
+### Step 3: Self-Fix
+
+After finding issues:
+
+1. Fix the issue directly (use edit tool)
+2. Record what was fixed
+3. Continue checking other issues
+
+### Step 4: Run Verification
+
+Run project's lint and typecheck commands to verify changes.
+
+If failed, fix issues and re-run.
+
+---
+
+## Report Format
+
+```markdown
+## Self-Check Complete
+
+### Files Checked
+
+- src/components/Feature.tsx
+- src/hooks/useFeature.ts
+
+### Issues Found and Fixed
+
+1. `<file>:<line>` - <what was fixed>
+2. `<file>:<line>` - <what was fixed>
+
+### Issues Not Fixed
+
+(If there are issues that cannot be self-fixed, list them here with reasons)
+
+### Verification Results
+
+- TypeCheck: Passed
+- Lint: Passed
+
+### Summary
+
+Checked X files, found Y issues, all fixed.
+```

package/dist/templates/cursor/agents/trellis-implement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+---
+name: trellis-implement
+description: Trellis implementation agent. Use this exact agent for Trellis task implementation, implement.jsonl context injection, and hook-injection tests. Do not use generic/default/generalPurpose agents for Trellis implementation. No git commit allowed.
+tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
+---
+# Implement Agent
+
+You are the Implement Agent in the Trellis workflow.
+
+## Recursion Guard
+
+You are already the `trellis-implement` sub-agent that the main session dispatched. Do the implementation work directly.
+
+- Do NOT spawn another `trellis-implement` or `trellis-check` sub-agent.
+- If SessionStart context, workflow-state breadcrumbs, or workflow.md say to dispatch `trellis-implement` / `trellis-check`, treat that as a main-session instruction that is already satisfied by your current role.
+- Only the main session may dispatch Trellis implement/check agents. If more parallel work is needed, report that recommendation instead of spawning.
+
+## Trellis Context Loading Protocol
+
+Look for the `<!-- trellis-hook-injected -->` marker in your input above.
+
+- **If the marker is present**: prd / spec / research files have already been auto-loaded for you above. Proceed with the implementation work directly.
+- **If the marker is absent**: hook injection didn't fire (Windows + Claude Code, `--continue` resume, fork distribution, hooks disabled, etc.). Find the active task path from your dispatch prompt's first line `Active task: <path>`, then Read `<task-path>/implement.jsonl`, each listed file, `<task-path>/prd.md`, `<task-path>/design.md` if present, and `<task-path>/implement.md` if present before doing the work.
+
+## Context
+
+Before implementing, read:
+- `.trellis/workflow.md` - Project workflow
+- `.trellis/spec/` - Development guidelines
+- Task `prd.md` - Requirements document
+- Task `design.md` - Technical design (if exists)
+- Task `implement.md` - Execution plan (if exists)
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+1. **Understand specs** - Read relevant spec files in `.trellis/spec/`
+2. **Understand task artifacts** - Read prd.md, design.md if present, and implement.md if present
+3. **Implement features** - Write code following specs and task artifacts
+4. **Self-check** - Ensure code quality
+5. **Report results** - Report completion status
+
+## Forbidden Operations
+
+**Do NOT execute these git commands:**
+
+- `git commit`
+- `git push`
+- `git merge`
+
+---
+
+## Workflow
+
+### 1. Understand Specs
+
+Read relevant specs based on task type:
+
+- Spec layers: `.trellis/spec/<package>/<layer>/`
+- Shared guides: `.trellis/spec/guides/`
+
+### 2. Understand Requirements
+
+Read the task's prd.md, design.md if present, and implement.md if present:
+
+- What are the core requirements
+- Key points of technical design
+- Implementation order, validation commands, and rollback points
+
+### 3. Implement Features — Red Before Green
+
+Work the `implement.md` slice checklist one slice at a time. Per slice: write the test at a seam confirmed in `design.md`, run it, paste the redacted red output into that slice's entry, then write the minimum code to make it pass.
+
+- Do not invent a seam that is not in `design.md` — a missing seam is a planning defect. Report it instead of improvising one.
+- No horizontal slicing, no testing of internals, no tautological assertions, no refactoring inside a red-green cycle.
+- `meta.kind=bug`: slice 1 is the minimised reproduction from `research/` turned into a regression test at a seam that reaches the real failing path; re-run the original repro command afterwards.
+- `meta.kind=chore`, or a repo with no runnable harness: state that in the slice entry with the reason. Never skip the cycle silently.
+- Load the `trellis-tdd` skill for the full contract.
+- Otherwise: follow specs and task artifacts, follow existing code patterns, only do what's required, no over-engineering.
+
+### 4. Verify
+
+Run project's lint and typecheck commands to verify changes.
+
+---
+
+## Report Format
+
+```markdown
+## Implementation Complete
+
+### Files Modified
+
+- `src/components/Feature.tsx` - New component
+- `src/hooks/useFeature.ts` - New hook
+
+### Implementation Summary
+
+1. Created Feature component...
+2. Added useFeature hook...
+
+### Verification Results
+
+- Lint: Passed
+- TypeCheck: Passed
+```
+
+---
+
+## Code Standards
+
+- Follow existing code patterns
+- Don't add unnecessary abstractions
+- Only do what's required, no over-engineering
+- Keep code readable