@bluelibs/runner 6.3.0 → 6.3.1

package/readmes/CRITICAL_THINKING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Critical Thinking Checklist
+
+← [Back to main README](../README.md)
+
+## Before Starting Work
+
+- "Think critically about whether this change is actually needed"
+- "Question the assumptions behind this approach"
+- "What's the real problem we're solving? Is this the best solution?"
+- "Apply second-order thinking - what could go wrong with this approach?"
+- "Is this over-engineering? What's the simplest thing that could work?"
+
+## During Design/Planning
+
+- "What are the trade-offs of this approach? Be specific."
+- "How could this make the code worse, not better?"
+- "Where are we introducing unnecessary complexity?"
+- "Does this follow the KISS principle? If not, why?"
+- "What would a future developer think of this code?"
+- "Are we optimizing prematurely? What's the actual evidence this is needed?"
+
+## For DRY/Similar Patterns
+
+- "Is this repetition actually harmful, or does it serve clarity?"
+- "Does consolidating this code make it more complex than the repetition?"
+- "Are we sacrificing type safety or readability for DRY?"
+- "Is this a case where WET (Write Everything Twice) is better than DRY?"
+
+## For Testing
+
+- "Are these tests actually valuable or just chasing coverage?"
+- "What edge cases are we missing?"
+- "How could this test give false confidence?"
+- "Are we testing implementation details or behavior?"
+
+## After Implementation
+
+- "Review this critically - what would you improve?"
+- "What's the weakest part of this solution?"
+- "If you were taking over this code, what would you question?"
+- "Does this solve the original problem or create new ones?"
+
+## General Meta-Prompts
+
+- "You're overlooking something obvious. What is it?"
+- "Challenge your own answer - what's wrong with it?"
+- "Play devil's advocate against your own approach"
+- "What's the counter-argument to doing this?"
+- "Slow down and think - is this really necessary?"