@bluefly/openstandardagents 0.2.4 → 0.2.7

package/docs/comparison.md

@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+# OSSA Competitive Comparison Matrix
+
+## Quick Comparison
+
+| Feature | OSSA | LangChain | AutoGen | MCP | Semantic Kernel |
+|---------|------|-----------|---------|-----|-----------------|
+| **Vendor Neutral** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
+| **Formal Standard** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
+| **Multi-Runtime** | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
+| **Enterprise Governance** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
+| **Compliance Ready** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
+| **Multi-Agent Orchestration** | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
+| **Open Source** | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
+| **Production Maturity** | 🟡 | ✅ | 🟡 | 🟡 | ✅ |
+| **Community Size** | 🟡 | ✅ | 🟡 | 🟡 | 🟡 |
+
+**Legend:**
+- ✅ Full support
+- 🟡 Partial/In progress
+- ❌ Not supported
+
+## Detailed Comparison
+
+### OSSA (Open Standard for AI Agents)
+
+**What it is:** Vendor-neutral specification for building portable AI agent systems
+
+**Strengths:**
+- True vendor independence—no provider lock-in
+- Built-in compliance frameworks (HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC2)
+- Formal specification with versioning and governance
+- Multi-runtime support (Node.js, Python planned)
+- Enterprise-grade lifecycle management
+
+**Limitations:**
+- Newer project, smaller community
+- Fewer pre-built integrations than mature frameworks
+- Still building ecosystem of tools and adapters
+
+**Best for:**
+- Enterprise deployments requiring compliance
+- Organizations avoiding vendor lock-in
+- Multi-provider agent architectures
+- Regulated industries (healthcare, government, finance)
+
+---
+
+### LangChain
+
+**What it is:** Python/TypeScript framework for building LLM applications
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Large ecosystem and community
+- Extensive integrations and tools
+- Production-proven at scale
+- Rich documentation and examples
+
+**Limitations:**
+- Provider bias (OpenAI-centric design)
+- No formal compliance frameworks
+- Framework lock-in (not a standard)
+- Limited governance capabilities
+
+**Best for:**
+- Rapid prototyping
+- OpenAI-primary deployments
+- Projects not requiring strict compliance
+- Teams comfortable with framework dependencies
+
+**Choose OSSA over LangChain if:**
+- You need to switch between AI providers
+- Compliance is a requirement
+- You want a standard, not a framework
+- Vendor independence is critical
+
+---
+
+### AutoGen
+
+**What it is:** Microsoft's multi-agent conversation framework
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Strong multi-agent capabilities
+- Good for research and experimentation
+- Microsoft backing and support
+- Innovative conversation patterns
+
+**Limitations:**
+- Python-only (no multi-runtime)
+- Microsoft/Azure-centric
+- Not a formal standard
+- Limited enterprise governance
+
+**Best for:**
+- Research projects
+- Microsoft/Azure environments
+- Python-only teams
+- Multi-agent experimentation
+
+**Choose OSSA over AutoGen if:**
+- You need multi-runtime support
+- You're not in Microsoft ecosystem
+- You need formal compliance frameworks
+- You want vendor neutrality
+
+---
+
+### MCP (Model Context Protocol)
+
+**What it is:** Anthropic's protocol for connecting context to LLMs
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Formal specification
+- Vendor-neutral design
+- Good for context management
+- Growing adoption
+
+**Limitations:**
+- Context protocol only (not full agent lifecycle)
+- No multi-agent orchestration
+- No built-in governance
+- Limited to context sharing
+
+**Best for:**
+- Context management between tools
+- Anthropic Claude integrations
+- Simple context-sharing use cases
+
+**Choose OSSA over MCP if:**
+- You need full agent lifecycle management
+- You want multi-agent orchestration
+- You need enterprise governance
+- You're building complex agent systems
+
+**Use together:**
+- OSSA agents can use MCP for context management
+- Complementary, not competitive
+
+---
+
+### Semantic Kernel
+
+**What it is:** Microsoft's SDK for integrating LLMs into applications
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Microsoft backing
+- Multi-language support (.NET, Python, Java)
+- Good Azure integration
+- Enterprise features
+
+**Limitations:**
+- Microsoft-controlled (not community-driven)
+- Azure-optimized (vendor bias)
+- SDK, not a standard
+- Limited vendor independence
+
+**Best for:**
+- Microsoft/.NET shops
+- Azure-centric deployments
+- Enterprise Microsoft customers
+
+**Choose OSSA over Semantic Kernel if:**
+- You want community-driven standards
+- You need true vendor neutrality
+- You're not in Microsoft ecosystem
+- You want formal compliance frameworks
+
+---
+
+## Feature Deep-Dive
+
+### Vendor Neutral
+**Why it matters:** Avoid lock-in, maintain negotiating power, switch providers as market evolves
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Core design principle—no provider bias
+- **LangChain**: ❌ OpenAI-centric abstractions
+- **AutoGen**: ❌ Microsoft/Azure focus
+- **MCP**: ✅ Vendor-neutral by design
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ❌ Azure-optimized
+
+### Formal Standard
+**Why it matters:** Interoperability, long-term stability, community governance
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Versioned specification with governance
+- **LangChain**: ❌ Framework, not a standard
+- **AutoGen**: ❌ Research project
+- **MCP**: ✅ Formal protocol specification
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ❌ Microsoft SDK
+
+### Multi-Runtime Support
+**Why it matters:** Use best language for each component, team flexibility
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Node.js, Python (planned), more coming
+- **LangChain**: ✅ Python and TypeScript
+- **AutoGen**: ❌ Python only
+- **MCP**: ❌ Language-agnostic protocol, but limited implementations
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ✅ .NET, Python, Java
+
+### Enterprise Governance
+**Why it matters:** Versioning, change control, audit trails, compliance
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Built-in lifecycle management
+- **LangChain**: ❌ No formal governance
+- **AutoGen**: ❌ Research-focused
+- **MCP**: ❌ Protocol only
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ❌ Limited governance features
+
+### Compliance Ready
+**Why it matters:** HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC2 requirements for production
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Built-in compliance frameworks
+- **LangChain**: ❌ No compliance features
+- **AutoGen**: ❌ Not compliance-focused
+- **MCP**: ❌ No compliance features
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ❌ No built-in compliance
+
+### Multi-Agent Orchestration
+**Why it matters:** Complex workflows, agent collaboration, scalability
+
+- **OSSA**: ✅ Standardized composition patterns
+- **LangChain**: ✅ Agent chains and tools
+- **AutoGen**: ✅ Strong multi-agent focus
+- **MCP**: ❌ Not designed for orchestration
+- **Semantic Kernel**: ✅ Planner and orchestration
+
+---
+
+## Use Case Mapping
+
+### Choose OSSA if you need:
+- ✅ Vendor independence and portability
+- ✅ Regulatory compliance (HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC2)
+- ✅ Enterprise governance and lifecycle management
+- ✅ Multi-provider agent architectures
+- ✅ Formal standard with community governance
+
+### Choose LangChain if you need:
+- ✅ Rapid prototyping with rich ecosystem
+- ✅ OpenAI-primary deployments
+- ✅ Extensive pre-built integrations
+- ✅ Large community and resources
+- ❌ But accept framework lock-in
+
+### Choose AutoGen if you need:
+- ✅ Multi-agent research and experimentation
+- ✅ Python-only environment
+- ✅ Microsoft/Azure ecosystem
+- ❌ But don't need production governance
+
+### Choose MCP if you need:
+- ✅ Simple context sharing between tools
+- ✅ Anthropic Claude integration
+- ✅ Lightweight protocol
+- ❌ But don't need full agent lifecycle
+
+### Choose Semantic Kernel if you need:
+- ✅ Microsoft/.NET integration
+- ✅ Azure-optimized deployment
+- ✅ Enterprise Microsoft support
+- ❌ But accept Microsoft ecosystem lock-in
+
+---
+
+## Migration Paths
+
+### From LangChain to OSSA
+1. Map LangChain chains to OSSA agent definitions
+2. Replace provider-specific code with OSSA adapters
+3. Add compliance and governance layers
+4. Test with multiple providers
+
+**Effort:** Medium (2-4 weeks for typical application)
+
+### From AutoGen to OSSA
+1. Convert AutoGen agents to OSSA agent specs
+2. Migrate conversation patterns to OSSA orchestration
+3. Add multi-runtime support if needed
+4. Implement governance requirements
+
+**Effort:** Medium-High (3-6 weeks)
+
+### From Semantic Kernel to OSSA
+1. Extract business logic from SK abstractions
+2. Define OSSA agent specifications
+3. Replace Azure-specific code with provider-agnostic adapters
+4. Add compliance frameworks
+
+**Effort:** Medium (2-4 weeks)
+
+### Using MCP with OSSA
+- MCP and OSSA are complementary
+- Use MCP for context management within OSSA agents
+- No migration needed—integrate both
+
+---
+
+## Summary: When to Choose OSSA
+
+**Choose OSSA when:**
+1. Vendor independence is critical
+2. Compliance is required (HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC2)
+3. You need enterprise governance
+4. You want a standard, not a framework
+5. You're building for long-term portability
+
+**Consider alternatives when:**
+1. You need rapid prototyping with rich ecosystem (→ LangChain)
+2. You're doing multi-agent research (→ AutoGen)
+3. You only need context sharing (→ MCP)
+4. You're all-in on Microsoft/.NET (→ Semantic Kernel)
+
+**The OSSA Advantage:**
+> "Build once, run anywhere—with compliance and governance built in."
+
+No other solution offers the combination of vendor neutrality, formal standards, compliance frameworks, and enterprise governance that OSSA provides.

package/docs/operations/automation-roadmap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+# Automation Audit Report
+
+## Shell Scripts Found (Convert to TypeScript)
+
+### 1. `.gitlab/release-automation/setup.sh`
+**Current**: Bash script for release setup
+**Convert to**: 
+- TypeScript service with Zod validation
+- OSSA CLI command: `ossa release setup`
+- GitLab CI job (automated)
+
+### 2. `website/restart-dev.sh`
+**Current**: Bash script to restart dev server
+**Action**: DELETE - Not needed in production
+**Alternative**: Use `npm run dev` directly
+
+### 3. `scripts/setup-branch-protection.sh`
+**Current**: Bash script for branch protection
+**Convert to**:
+- TypeScript service with GitLab API client
+- OSSA CLI command: `ossa repo protect`
+- Run automatically in CI on repo setup
+
+### 4. `infrastructure/k8s/monitoring/deploy.sh`
+**Current**: Bash deployment script
+**Convert to**:
+- TypeScript K8s client with Zod schemas
+- OSSA CLI command: `ossa k8s deploy`
+- GitLab CI job (automated)
+
+## Manual CI Jobs (Automate)
+
+Found **13 manual jobs** in CI config.
+
+### High Priority Automations
+
+1. **Release Process**
+   - Current: Manual trigger
+   - Automate: On tag push
+   - Agent: Release automation agent
+
+2. **Dependency Updates**
+   - Current: Manual Dependabot review
+   - Automate: Daily scheduled sync (DONE in MR !65)
+   - Agent: GitHub sync agent
+
+3. **Branch Protection**
+   - Current: Manual setup
+   - Automate: On repo creation
+   - Agent: Repository setup agent
+
+4. **Deployment**
+   - Current: Manual trigger
+   - Automate: On merge to main
+   - Agent: Deployment agent
+
+5. **Version Bumping**
+   - Current: Manual npm version
+   - Automate: Semantic release (already exists)
+   - Agent: Version management agent
+
+## Opportunities for GitLab Agents
+
+### 1. Code Review Agent
+```yaml
+code-review:
+  stage: .pre
+  script:
+    - ossa review mr $CI_MERGE_REQUEST_IID
+  rules:
+    - if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "merge_request_event"
+```
+
+### 2. Documentation Agent
+```yaml
+docs-update:
+  stage: .post
+  script:
+    - ossa docs sync
+  rules:
+    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
+```
+
+### 3. Security Scan Agent
+```yaml
+security-scan:
+  stage: test
+  script:
+    - ossa security scan
+  rules:
+    - if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "merge_request_event"
+```
+
+### 4. Performance Test Agent
+```yaml
+performance:
+  stage: test
+  script:
+    - ossa perf test
+  rules:
+    - if: $CI_MERGE_REQUEST_LABELS =~ /performance/
+```
+
+## Conversion Plan
+
+### Phase 1: Core Scripts (Week 1)
+
+1. **Release Automation**
+   ```typescript
+   // src/services/release/release.service.ts
+   export class ReleaseService {
+     async setup(): Promise<void>
+     async bump(type: 'major' | 'minor' | 'patch'): Promise<string>
+     async publish(): Promise<void>
+   }
+   ```
+
+2. **Branch Protection**
+   ```typescript
+   // src/services/repo/protection.service.ts
+   export class ProtectionService {
+     async protect(branch: string, rules: ProtectionRules): Promise<void>
+     async unprotect(branch: string): Promise<void>
+   }
+   ```
+
+### Phase 2: Infrastructure (Week 2)
+
+3. **K8s Deployment**
+   ```typescript
+   // src/services/k8s/deploy.service.ts
+   export class K8sDeployService {
+     async deploy(manifest: K8sManifest): Promise<DeployResult>
+     async rollback(deployment: string): Promise<void>
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Monitoring Setup**
+   ```typescript
+   // src/services/monitoring/setup.service.ts
+   export class MonitoringService {
+     async setup(config: MonitoringConfig): Promise<void>
+     async health(): Promise<HealthStatus>
+   }
+   ```
+
+### Phase 3: Agents (Week 3)
+
+5. **GitLab Agents**
+   - Code review agent
+   - Documentation agent
+   - Security scan agent
+   - Performance test agent
+
+## Implementation Template
+
+### Service Structure
+```typescript
+// src/services/{domain}/{service}.service.ts
+import { z } from 'zod';
+
+const ConfigSchema = z.object({
+  // Zod validation
+});
+
+export class ServiceName {
+  constructor(config: z.infer<typeof ConfigSchema>) {
+    ConfigSchema.parse(config);
+  }
+
+  async operation(): Promise<Result> {
+    // Implementation
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### CLI Command
+```typescript
+// src/cli/commands/{domain}.command.ts
+import { Command } from 'commander';
+import { ServiceName } from '../../services/{domain}/{service}.service';
+
+export const commandName = new Command('name')
+  .description('Description')
+  .action(async () => {
+    const service = new ServiceName(config);
+    await service.operation();
+  });
+```
+
+### OpenAPI Spec
+```yaml
+# openapi/{service}.yaml
+paths:
+  /{operation}:
+    post:
+      operationId: operation
+      requestBody:
+        content:
+          application/json:
+            schema:
+              $ref: '#/components/schemas/Request'
+```
+
+### GitLab CI Job
+```yaml
+# .gitlab/ci/{service}.yml
+{service}:
+  stage: {stage}
+  script:
+    - ossa {command}
+  rules:
+    - if: {condition}
+```
+
+## Metrics
+
+### Current State
+- Shell scripts: 4
+- Manual CI jobs: 13
+- Automation coverage: ~40%
+
+### Target State
+- Shell scripts: 0
+- Manual CI jobs: 3 (deploy to prod, rollback, emergency)
+- Automation coverage: ~95%
+
+### Benefits
+- Faster development
+- Fewer errors
+- Better testing
+- Type safety
+- Maintainability
+
+## Priority Order
+
+1. ✅ GitHub PR sync (DONE - MR !65)
+2. 🔄 Release automation
+3. 🔄 Branch protection
+4. 🔄 K8s deployment
+5. 🔄 Code review agent
+6. 🔄 Security scan agent
+7. 🔄 Documentation agent
+8. 🔄 Performance test agent
+