@blockrun/franklin 3.8.13 → 3.8.15

package/dist/agent/evaluator.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/**
+ * Grounding evaluator — a cheap second-pass check that every factual claim
+ * in Franklin's answer traces back to a tool-call result, not model memory.
+ *
+ * Why this exists (2026-04 retrospective): the CRCL incident — user asked
+ * about a stock Franklin had tools to query, Franklin answered from 2022
+ * training data instead. Root cause wasn't a prompt defect; it was an
+ * absent evaluator. The existing `verification.ts` only fires when the
+ * agent writes code (Edit / Write / Bash threshold), so read-heavy hero
+ * use cases (trading, research, analysis) never triggered any quality gate.
+ *
+ * This module is the complement: fires on *answers with factual content*,
+ * regardless of tool type. Anthropic's harness-design article calls out
+ * "self-evaluation on complex tasks" as anti-pattern #14 — models skew
+ * positive when grading themselves. So the check runs as a separate agent
+ * (different system prompt, explicitly adversarial) with its own model.
+ *
+ * v1 scope: check only, never re-prompt. Emit a follow-up ⚠️ event when
+ * claims look ungrounded, let the user decide whether to re-ask. The
+ * re-prompt loop (generator iterates against evaluator findings until
+ * PASS) is a v2 concern once we know v1 catches real cases without
+ * false-positive noise.
+ */
+import type { CapabilityHandler, Dialogue } from './types.js';
+import { ModelClient } from './llm.js';
+export type GroundingVerdict = 'GROUNDED' | 'PARTIAL' | 'UNGROUNDED' | 'SKIPPED';
+export interface GroundingResult {
+    verdict: GroundingVerdict;
+    issues: string[];
+    raw: string;
+}
+/**
+ * Decide whether this turn warrants a grounding check. Principles:
+ * - Non-trivial user input (not a greeting, not a slash command)
+ * - Non-trivial assistant text output (not just a tool-result echo)
+ *
+ * Intentionally NOT gating on tool-type (read vs write) — the whole point
+ * of this module is to cover read-heavy turns the code verifier misses.
+ */
+export declare function shouldCheckGrounding(userInput: string, assistantText: string): boolean;
+export declare function parseGroundingResponse(raw: string): GroundingResult;
+/** Cheap model for grading. Default matches existing verification.ts
+ *  choice so both quality gates have the same cost profile. Override via
+ *  `FRANKLIN_EVALUATOR_MODEL` to experiment with accuracy/cost trade-offs. */
+export declare function evaluatorModel(): string;
+export declare function checkGrounding(userInput: string, history: Dialogue[], assistantText: string, client: ModelClient, opts?: {
+    abortSignal?: AbortSignal;
+    model?: string;
+}): Promise<GroundingResult>;
+/**
+ * Convert a grounding result into a user-facing follow-up message. Returns
+ * empty string when verdict is GROUNDED / SKIPPED — no reason to spam the
+ * user when the check agreed the answer was sound.
+ */
+export declare function renderGroundingFollowup(result: GroundingResult): string;
+export type { CapabilityHandler };

package/dist/agent/evaluator.js

@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/**
+ * Grounding evaluator — a cheap second-pass check that every factual claim
+ * in Franklin's answer traces back to a tool-call result, not model memory.
+ *
+ * Why this exists (2026-04 retrospective): the CRCL incident — user asked
+ * about a stock Franklin had tools to query, Franklin answered from 2022
+ * training data instead. Root cause wasn't a prompt defect; it was an
+ * absent evaluator. The existing `verification.ts` only fires when the
+ * agent writes code (Edit / Write / Bash threshold), so read-heavy hero
+ * use cases (trading, research, analysis) never triggered any quality gate.
+ *
+ * This module is the complement: fires on *answers with factual content*,
+ * regardless of tool type. Anthropic's harness-design article calls out
+ * "self-evaluation on complex tasks" as anti-pattern #14 — models skew
+ * positive when grading themselves. So the check runs as a separate agent
+ * (different system prompt, explicitly adversarial) with its own model.
+ *
+ * v1 scope: check only, never re-prompt. Emit a follow-up ⚠️ event when
+ * claims look ungrounded, let the user decide whether to re-ask. The
+ * re-prompt loop (generator iterates against evaluator findings until
+ * PASS) is a v2 concern once we know v1 catches real cases without
+ * false-positive noise.
+ */
+// ─── Evaluator system prompt ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+//
+// Principle-based, not example-enumerating. Specific tickers or phrasings
+// hard-coded here would rot the moment the market changes. The rule is
+// general: claim → tool result or explicit uncertainty.
+const EVALUATOR_PROMPT = `You are a GROUNDING CHECK agent. Your job is to verify that an AI assistant's answer is grounded in tool-call evidence, not model memory.
+
+## What you receive
+- The user's question
+- A list of tool calls made this turn (tool name, input summary, whether it succeeded)
+- The assistant's final text answer
+
+## What you check
+Every **factual claim** in the answer must trace to ONE of:
+  (a) A successful tool call result from this turn, OR
+  (b) Explicit acknowledgment of uncertainty ("I'm not sure", "based on older data", "I'd need to check")
+
+Claims that are ungrounded:
+- Specific current-world facts stated with confidence but not backed by any tool call this turn
+- Recommendations or conclusions that depend on unstated data (e.g. "you should sell" without a price lookup)
+- Invented specifics — names, numbers, dates the model produced without a tool call supporting them
+
+Claims that are grounded:
+- Anything directly derived from a tool result shown in the turn
+- General knowledge / definitions / reasoning that doesn't depend on current-world specifics
+- Claims explicitly hedged as uncertain
+
+## Output — exact format
+
+VERDICT: GROUNDED | PARTIAL | UNGROUNDED
+
+If not GROUNDED, list each ungrounded claim on its own line starting with "- " and the tool that should have been called, like:
+- Claim: "<the ungrounded part, quoted briefly>" → missing tool: <TradingMarket | ExaAnswer | ExaSearch | WebSearch | ...>
+
+Empty line between verdict and list. No other text. No preamble. No apology. Be terse.`;
+// ─── Trigger policy ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+const MIN_USER_CHARS = 20; // Short inputs are greetings/acks, not questions
+const MIN_ANSWER_CHARS = 50; // Short answers are acks, not factual claims
+/**
+ * Decide whether this turn warrants a grounding check. Principles:
+ * - Non-trivial user input (not a greeting, not a slash command)
+ * - Non-trivial assistant text output (not just a tool-result echo)
+ *
+ * Intentionally NOT gating on tool-type (read vs write) — the whole point
+ * of this module is to cover read-heavy turns the code verifier misses.
+ */
+export function shouldCheckGrounding(userInput, assistantText) {
+    if (process.env.FRANKLIN_NO_EVAL === '1')
+        return false;
+    const ui = userInput.trim();
+    if (ui.length < MIN_USER_CHARS)
+        return false;
+    if (ui.startsWith('/'))
+        return false;
+    if (assistantText.trim().length < MIN_ANSWER_CHARS)
+        return false;
+    return true;
+}
+// ─── Turn summary extraction ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+/**
+ * Summarize the current turn for the evaluator: user question + tool calls
+ * + tool result snippets + assistant's final answer. Bounded to keep the
+ * evaluator call cheap; it doesn't need every byte of every tool output.
+ */
+function summarizeTurn(userInput, history, assistantText) {
+    const lines = [];
+    lines.push(`## User question`);
+    lines.push(userInput.trim().slice(0, 800));
+    lines.push('');
+    lines.push(`## Tool calls this turn`);
+    // Walk from the end of history back to (but not including) the user message.
+    // Each assistant tool_use and each user tool_result get condensed to one line.
+    let found = 0;
+    const toolLines = [];
+    for (let i = history.length - 1; i >= 0 && found < 40; i--) {
+        const msg = history[i];
+        if (msg.role === 'user' && typeof msg.content === 'string')
+            break;
+        if (msg.role === 'assistant' && Array.isArray(msg.content)) {
+            for (const part of msg.content) {
+                if (typeof part === 'object' && part.type === 'tool_use') {
+                    const inputStr = JSON.stringify(part.input).slice(0, 160);
+                    toolLines.unshift(`  - ${part.name}(${inputStr})`);
+                    found++;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        else if (msg.role === 'user' && Array.isArray(msg.content)) {
+            for (const part of msg.content) {
+                if (typeof part === 'object' && part.type === 'tool_result') {
+                    const output = typeof part.content === 'string'
+                        ? part.content
+                        : Array.isArray(part.content)
+                            ? part.content.map(c => c.text || '').join('\n')
+                            : '';
+                    const snippet = output.slice(0, 240).replace(/\s+/g, ' ');
+                    toolLines.unshift(`    → ${snippet}`);
+                    found++;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    if (toolLines.length === 0) {
+        lines.push('  (none)');
+    }
+    else {
+        lines.push(...toolLines);
+    }
+    lines.push('');
+    lines.push(`## Assistant's answer`);
+    lines.push(assistantText.trim().slice(0, 2400));
+    return lines.join('\n');
+}
+// ─── Verdict parser ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+export function parseGroundingResponse(raw) {
+    const text = raw.trim();
+    const m = text.match(/VERDICT:\s*(GROUNDED|PARTIAL|UNGROUNDED)/i);
+    const verdict = m
+        ? m[1].toUpperCase()
+        : 'PARTIAL'; // If the evaluator couldn't produce a clean verdict, err on the side of "flag for the user".
+    const issues = [];
+    const lines = text.split('\n');
+    for (const line of lines) {
+        const l = line.trim();
+        if (l.startsWith('- ') && l.length > 3) {
+            issues.push(l.slice(2).trim());
+        }
+    }
+    return { verdict, issues, raw: text };
+}
+// ─── Default evaluator model ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+/** Cheap model for grading. Default matches existing verification.ts
+ *  choice so both quality gates have the same cost profile. Override via
+ *  `FRANKLIN_EVALUATOR_MODEL` to experiment with accuracy/cost trade-offs. */
+export function evaluatorModel() {
+    return process.env.FRANKLIN_EVALUATOR_MODEL || 'nvidia/nemotron-ultra-253b';
+}
+// ─── Run grounding check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
+const MAX_EVAL_TOKENS = 512;
+const EVAL_TIMEOUT_MS = 15_000;
+export async function checkGrounding(userInput, history, assistantText, client, opts = {}) {
+    const model = opts.model || evaluatorModel();
+    const summary = summarizeTurn(userInput, history, assistantText);
+    // Run independently of the main agent — the evaluator gets NO tools
+    // (it just reads and grades). Limit tokens so a chatty evaluator can't
+    // balloon the cost of a cheap check.
+    const timeoutCtrl = new AbortController();
+    const timer = setTimeout(() => timeoutCtrl.abort(), EVAL_TIMEOUT_MS);
+    const signal = opts.abortSignal
+        ? anySignal([opts.abortSignal, timeoutCtrl.signal])
+        : timeoutCtrl.signal;
+    try {
+        const response = await client.complete({
+            model,
+            system: EVALUATOR_PROMPT,
+            messages: [{ role: 'user', content: summary }],
+            tools: [],
+            max_tokens: MAX_EVAL_TOKENS,
+        }, signal);
+        let raw = '';
+        for (const part of response.content) {
+            if (typeof part === 'object' && part.type === 'text' && part.text) {
+                raw += part.text;
+            }
+        }
+        if (!raw.trim()) {
+            return { verdict: 'SKIPPED', issues: [], raw: '(empty response)' };
+        }
+        return parseGroundingResponse(raw);
+    }
+    catch (err) {
+        return {
+            verdict: 'SKIPPED',
+            issues: [],
+            raw: `(evaluator error: ${err.message})`,
+        };
+    }
+    finally {
+        clearTimeout(timer);
+    }
+}
+/** Compose multiple AbortSignals into one — aborts when any source aborts. */
+function anySignal(signals) {
+    const ctrl = new AbortController();
+    for (const s of signals) {
+        if (s.aborted) {
+            ctrl.abort();
+            break;
+        }
+        s.addEventListener('abort', () => ctrl.abort(), { once: true });
+    }
+    return ctrl.signal;
+}
+// ─── Render result for the UI ────────────────────────────────────────────
+/**
+ * Convert a grounding result into a user-facing follow-up message. Returns
+ * empty string when verdict is GROUNDED / SKIPPED — no reason to spam the
+ * user when the check agreed the answer was sound.
+ */
+export function renderGroundingFollowup(result) {
+    if (result.verdict === 'GROUNDED' || result.verdict === 'SKIPPED')
+        return '';
+    const header = result.verdict === 'UNGROUNDED'
+        ? '⚠️ **Grounding check failed** — the previous answer relied on memory where a tool call was available:'
+        : '⚠️ **Grounding check flagged some claims** — re-run with the suggested tools for a verified answer:';
+    const body = result.issues.length > 0
+        ? result.issues.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')
+        : '(evaluator returned no specific items — check the transcript manually)';
+    return `\n\n${header}\n${body}\n\n_Ask again with an explicit instruction to call the tools, or disable these checks with \`FRANKLIN_NO_EVAL=1\`._`;
+}

package/dist/agent/loop.js

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import { routeRequest, parseRoutingProfile } from '../router/index.js';
 import { recordOutcome } from '../router/local-elo.js';
 import { shouldPlan, getPlanningPrompt, getExecutorModel, isExecutorStuck, toolCallSignature } from './planner.js';
 import { shouldVerify, runVerification } from './verification.js';
+import { shouldCheckGrounding, checkGrounding, renderGroundingFollowup } from './evaluator.js';
 import { createSessionId, appendToSession, updateSessionMeta, pruneOldSessions, loadSessionHistory, loadSessionMeta, } from '../session/storage.js';
 /**
  * Atomically replace all elements in a history array.
@@ -1073,7 +1074,10 @@ export async function interactiveSession(config, getUserInput, onEvent, onAbortR
                         });
                     }
                 }
-                // ── Verification gate: run adversarial checks on substantial work ──
+                // ── Verification gate: run adversarial checks on substantial CODE work ──
+                // Fires when the agent Edit/Write/Bash-ed enough to warrant running
+                // the build + tests. Complements the grounding check below, which
+                // covers read-heavy answers this verifier misses.
                 if (shouldVerify(turnToolCalls, turnToolCounts, lastUserInput || '')) {
                     try {
                         const vResult = await runVerification(history, capabilityMap, client, {
@@ -1102,6 +1106,31 @@ export async function interactiveSession(config, getUserInput, onEvent, onAbortR
                         // Verification errors never block the main flow
                     }
                 }
+                // ── Grounding gate: check that factual claims trace to tool calls ──
+                // Fires on any substantive answer to a non-trivial question. Designed
+                // to catch the failure mode the code-verifier misses: model answers
+                // a "what's X / should I buy Y" question from memory instead of
+                // calling the live tools. Evaluator runs as a separate agent on a
+                // cheap model; never blocks the turn, only appends a ⚠️ note when
+                // the answer looks ungrounded so the user can re-ask.
+                try {
+                    const assistantText = responseParts
+                        .filter(p => p.type === 'text' && typeof p.text === 'string')
+                        .map(p => p.text)
+                        .join('');
+                    if (shouldCheckGrounding(lastUserInput || '', assistantText)) {
+                        const gResult = await checkGrounding(lastUserInput, history, assistantText, client, {
+                            abortSignal: abort.signal,
+                        });
+                        const followup = renderGroundingFollowup(gResult);
+                        if (followup) {
+                            onEvent({ kind: 'text_delta', text: followup });
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+                catch {
+                    // Grounding check is best-effort — never block the main flow.
+                }
                 // Record success for local Elo learning (include tool call count for efficiency)
                 if (lastRoutedCategory && lastRoutedModel) {
                     recordOutcome(lastRoutedCategory, lastRoutedModel, 'continued', turnToolCalls);

package/dist/agent/planner.js

@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ const MULTI_STEP_PATTERN = /first.*then|step\s+\d|\d+\.\s|and\s+then|after\s+tha
  * the overhead of an extra planning call.
  */
 export function shouldPlan(tier, profile, userText, ultrathink, planDisabled) {
+    // Per-process opt-out for ablation / scripting ("is plan-then-execute
+    // still load-bearing?"). Takes precedence over every other heuristic.
+    if (process.env.FRANKLIN_NOPLAN === '1')
+        return false;
     // User disabled planning for this session
     if (planDisabled)
         return false;

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@blockrun/franklin",
-  "version": "3.8.13",
+  "version": "3.8.15",
   "description": "Franklin — The AI agent with a wallet. Spends USDC autonomously to get real work done. Pay per action, no subscriptions.",
   "type": "module",
   "exports": {