@blockrun/clawrouter 0.12.270 → 0.12.272
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +43 -7
- package/dist/cli.js +700 -127
- package/dist/index.d.ts +17 -0
- package/dist/index.js +385 -74
- package/docs/configuration.md +17 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/surf/SKILL.md +32 -5
package/docs/configuration.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ Per-request alternative: send `x-clawrouter-debug: false` on the request.
|
|
|
209
209
|
|
|
210
210
|
### CLAWROUTER_SOLANA_RPC_URL
|
|
211
211
|
|
|
212
|
-
Override the Solana RPC endpoint used for USDC balance checks
|
|
212
|
+
Override the Solana RPC endpoint used for USDC balance checks **and for signing
|
|
213
|
+
payments** (Solana chain only):
|
|
213
214
|
|
|
214
215
|
```bash
|
|
215
216
|
export CLAWROUTER_SOLANA_RPC_URL=https://your-rpc-provider.com
|
|
@@ -218,6 +219,21 @@ openclaw gateway restart
|
|
|
218
219
|
|
|
219
220
|
Public RPC may rate-limit on heavy usage. Use a dedicated RPC for production.
|
|
220
221
|
|
|
222
|
+
Unlike Base, where the EIP-3009 signature is produced entirely offline, signing
|
|
223
|
+
a Solana payment reads the payment asset's mint account over RPC. A host that
|
|
224
|
+
cannot reach `api.mainnet-beta.solana.com` therefore fails **every** paid Solana
|
|
225
|
+
call with `fetch failed` while `sol.blockrun.ai` itself answers normally. Check
|
|
226
|
+
egress before blaming the gateway:
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
```bash
|
|
229
|
+
curl -s -m 10 -X POST https://api.mainnet-beta.solana.com \
|
|
230
|
+
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
|
|
231
|
+
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"getAccountInfo","params":["EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",{"encoding":"base64"}]}'
|
|
232
|
+
```
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
If that hangs or is refused, point this variable at an endpoint the host can
|
|
235
|
+
reach.
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
221
237
|
---
|
|
222
238
|
|
|
223
239
|
## Wallet Configuration
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@blockrun/clawrouter",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.12.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.12.272",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Smart LLM router — save 84% on inference costs. 76 models (7 free). Pay by credit card (API key) or USDC (x402 wallet).",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"main": "dist/index.js",
|
package/skills/surf/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -26,11 +26,38 @@ license: MIT
|
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
27
|
Surf bundles **83 endpoints across 12 domains** into one paid HTTP API. ClawRouter exposes them at `http://127.0.0.1:8402/v1/surf/*`, paid the same way ClawRouter pays for LLM calls — an x402 USDC micropayment from the local wallet, or a draw on BlockRun account credit if an API key is configured (verified working on both, 2026-09-05). **No Surf account and no Surf API key either way.** Upstream lives at `api.asksurf.ai/gateway/v1` — ClawRouter forwards transparently.
|
|
28
28
|
|
|
29
|
-
**Pricing
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
29
|
+
**Pricing — flat per call, the same for every endpoint.**
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Surf used to be tiered at $0.001 / $0.005 / $0.020. It is not any more: upstream
|
|
32
|
+
now prices all three tiers identically (`SURF_TIER_{1,2,3}_PRICE` are equal). The
|
|
33
|
+
`Tier` column in the catalog below still describes endpoint weight, but it no
|
|
34
|
+
longer affects what you pay. Anything quoting the old tier prices is stale.
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
| Rail | Price per call |
|
|
37
|
+
| --------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
|
|
38
|
+
| API key (`api.blockrun.ai`) | **$0.0075** — base rate, no transaction fee |
|
|
39
|
+
| Wallet, Solana | **$0.0075** |
|
|
40
|
+
| Wallet, Base | **$0.0085** |
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
Verified 2026-09-05 by measurement, not from a price page: the API-key figure by
|
|
43
|
+
diffing the account ledger across one call, the wallet figures by reading the
|
|
44
|
+
`amount` in the x402 402 challenge, which quotes the price before anything is
|
|
45
|
+
signed. Base and Solana genuinely differ for the same endpoint.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
**A 402 quote is authoritative for the rail that issued it — and only that rail.**
|
|
48
|
+
On the wallet rail the price arrives in the challenge before you pay, so if this
|
|
49
|
+
table disagrees with it, believe the challenge and treat the table as stale.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Do NOT carry a wallet-rail 402 figure over to the API-key rail. The key rail
|
|
52
|
+
issues no 402 at all, and the wallet quote includes the chain's transaction fee
|
|
53
|
+
that account credit does not pay — on Base that is $0.0085 quoted against
|
|
54
|
+
$0.0075 actually billed to an account. Reading across rails turns a correct
|
|
55
|
+
number into a wrong one; it has already happened once.
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
The Base/Solana difference is deliberate, not drift: the $0.001 is the Base
|
|
58
|
+
transaction fee, and Solana omitting it is a migration incentive. Solana being
|
|
59
|
+
cheaper is expected — Solana priced _above_ Base would be the bug worth
|
|
60
|
+
reporting, since estimates generally assume the Base figure is the ceiling.
|
|
34
61
|
|
|
35
62
|
> The legacy **surf-1.5 chat** surface is intentionally NOT exposed yet — it's held until per-token settlement is wired. Trying `/v1/surf/chat/completions` returns 404 ("Unknown Surf endpoint"), no payment is taken.
|
|
36
63
|
|