@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.15.6 → 0.15.8

package/data/zeroday-lessons.json

@@ -11543,35 +11543,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2022-20775": {
     "name": "Cisco SD-WAN Path Traversal Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco SD-WAN CLI contains a path traversal vulnerability that could allow an authenticated local attacker to gain elevated privileges via improper access controls on commands within the application CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the root user.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a path-traversal flaw (CWE-25/CWE-282) reachable by an unauthenticated attacker. CISA KEV-listed 2026-02-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco SD-WAN fixed release; restrict the management surface to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SD-WAN surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the SD-WAN surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco SD-WAN is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2026-20127": {
     "name": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager Authentication Bypass Vulnerability",
@@ -13363,67 +13391,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-20393": {
     "name": "Cisco Multiple Products Improper Input Validation Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Secure Email Gateway, Secure Email, AsyncOS Software, and Web Manager appliances contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows threat actors to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system of an affected appliance.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "improper input validation (CWE-20) reachable by an unauthenticated attacker. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-17 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco fixed releases for each affected product; restrict management/data interfaces to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Cisco product surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the Cisco product surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco (multiple products) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-59718": {
     "name": "Fortinet Multiple Products Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiOS, FortiSwitchMaster, FortiProxy, and FortiWeb contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the FortiCloud SSO login authentication via a crafted SAML message. Please be aware that CVE-2025-59719 pertains to the same problem and is mentioned in the same vendor advisory. Ensure to apply all patches mentioned in the advisory.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "improper verification of a cryptographic signature (CWE-347), allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass a signature check. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-16 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Fortinet PSIRT fixed builds for each affected product; restrict management interfaces to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Fortinet product surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the Fortinet product surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet (multiple products) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-14611": {
     "name": "Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox Hard Coded Cryptographic Vulnerability",
@@ -13875,67 +13959,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-58034": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb OS Command Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains an OS command Injection vulnerability that may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "OS command injection (CWE-78) giving an unauthenticated attacker command execution on the FortiWeb appliance. CISA KEV-listed 2025-11-18 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build in the Fortinet PSIRT advisory; restrict the management interface and review for unexpected process execution.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb management surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb management surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-64446": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb Path Traversal Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains a relative path traversal vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute administrative commands on the system via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a path-traversal flaw (CWE-23) on FortiWeb reachable by an unauthenticated attacker. CISA KEV-listed 2025-11-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build; restrict the management interface and audit for unauthorized file access.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-12480": {
     "name": "Gladinet Triofox Improper Access Control Vulnerability",
@@ -15219,35 +15359,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-20352": {
     "name": "Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software SNMP Denial of Service and Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco IOS and IOS XE contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) subsystem that could allow for denial of service or remote code execution. A successful exploit could allow a low-privileged attacker to cause the affected system to reload, resulting in a DoS condition, or allow a high-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user and obtain full control of the affected system.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a stack-based overflow (CWE-121) in the SNMP subsystem, exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker for denial of service and remote code execution. CISA KEV-listed 2025-09-29 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco IOS/IOS XE fixed release; restrict SNMP to trusted hosts and disable affected OIDs where the advisory permits, pending the upgrade.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the IOS/IOS XE SNMP subsystem: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the IOS/IOS XE SNMP subsystem; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco IOS / IOS XE is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2021-21311": {
     "name": "Adminer Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability",
@@ -15283,67 +15451,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-20362": {
     "name": "Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security (ASA) Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Missing Authorization Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security (ASA) Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software VPN Web Server contain a missing authorization vulnerability. This vulnerability could be chained with CVE-2025-20333.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a missing-authorization flaw (CWE-862) allowing an unauthenticated attacker to reach restricted URL endpoints (the ASA web-services chain). CISA KEV-listed 2025-09-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
     },
-    "framework_coverage": {
-      "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
-        "covered": true,
-        "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
-      },
-      "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
-        "covered": true,
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco ASA/FTD fixed release; restrict the management/VPN web surface and, on indicators of compromise, follow Cisco's ArcaneDoor-class forensic guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the ASA/FTD web surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the ASA/FTD web surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
+    },
+    "framework_coverage": {
+      "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
+        "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
+      },
+      "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Secure Firewall ASA / FTD is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-20333": {
     "name": "Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security (ASA) Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software VPN Web Server contain a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows for remote code execution. This vulnerability could be chained with CVE-2025-20362.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a buffer overflow (CWE-120) enabling unauthenticated remote code execution (chained with the missing-authorization flaw). CISA KEV-listed 2025-09-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco ASA/FTD fixed release; this is chained for full compromise, so on any indicator treat the appliance as compromised and follow Cisco's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the ASA/FTD web surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the ASA/FTD web surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Secure Firewall ASA / FTD is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-5086": {
     "name": "Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability",
@@ -16051,67 +16275,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-20337": {
     "name": "Cisco Identity Services Engine Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Identity Services Engine contains an injection vulnerability in a specific API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input allowing an attacker to exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted API request. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to perform remote code execution and obtaining root privileges on an affected device.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "an injection flaw (CWE-74) enabling unauthenticated code execution on Cisco ISE. CISA KEV-listed 2025-07-28 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco ISE fixed release; restrict the ISE admin/portal surface to trusted networks and review for unexpected process execution.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the ISE surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the ISE surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-20281": {
-    "name": "Cisco Identity Services Engine Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "name": "Cisco Identity Services Engine Injection Vulnerability (variant: CVE-2025-20281)",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Identity Services Engine contains an injection vulnerability in a specific API of Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE-PIC due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input allowing an attacker to exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted API request. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to perform remote code execution and obtaining root privileges on an affected device.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "an injection flaw (CWE-74, a variant) enabling unauthenticated code execution on Cisco ISE. CISA KEV-listed 2025-07-28 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the device)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco ISE fixed release; restrict the ISE admin/portal surface and review for unexpected process execution.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a network-device patch cycle (gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the ISE surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, device crashes/reloads, and unexpected command execution or restricted-endpoint access.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of devices not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence (implants/config changes) and rotate credentials reachable from the ISE surface; on indicators of compromise, follow the vendor's forensic/recovery guidance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated device flaw; network-device implants survive patching without explicit recovery steps."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-device flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing network device."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the device class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter network device in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-2775": {
     "name": "SysAid On-Prem Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference Vulnerability",
@@ -16339,35 +16619,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-25257": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb SQL Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains a SQL injection vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "SQL injection (CWE-89) on the FortiWeb surface, reachable unauthenticated and escalating to compromise. CISA KEV-listed 2025-07-18 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build; restrict the management interface to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-47812": {
     "name": "Wing FTP Server Improper Neutralization of Null Byte or NUL Character Vulnerability",
@@ -16691,35 +16999,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2019-6693": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiOS Use of Hard-Coded Credentials Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiOS contains a use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability that could allow an attacker to cipher sensitive data in FortiOS configuration backup file via knowledge of the hard-coded key. ",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798) in FortiOS, allowing authentication with built-in credentials. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiOS to a fixed build and rotate/replace any configuration encrypted under the default key; restrict management access.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiOS appliance: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiOS appliance; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
-      "basis": "Known ransomware-campaign use; passing orgs typically still exposed when patch deployment lags KEV due date.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiOS is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2024-0769": {
     "name": " D-Link DIR-859 Router Path Traversal Vulnerability",
@@ -17587,35 +17923,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-32756": {
     "name": "Fortinet Multiple Products Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiFone, FortiVoice, FortiNDR and FortiMail contain a stack-based overflow vulnerability that may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-124) across multiple Fortinet products, reachable by an unauthenticated attacker for remote code execution. CISA KEV-listed 2025-05-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Fortinet PSIRT fixed builds for each affected product; where an immediate upgrade is not possible, disable the affected interface per the advisory workaround.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Fortinet product surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the Fortinet product surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet (multiple products) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-32709": {
     "name": "Microsoft Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Use-After-Free Vulnerability",