@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.15.5 → 0.15.7

package/data/zeroday-lessons.json

@@ -7031,67 +7031,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2026-20122": {
     "name": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager contains an incorrect use of privileged APIs vulnerability due to improper file handling on the API interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious file on the local file system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite arbitrary files on the affected system and gain vmanage user privileges.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "an incorrect use of privileged APIs (CWE-648) reachable by an unauthenticated attacker, enabling privileged actions on the management plane. CISA KEV-listed 2026-04-20 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager fixed release; restrict the management plane to trusted networks and review for unauthorized privileged actions.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SD-WAN Manager management plane: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the SD-WAN Manager management plane.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2026-20133": {
     "name": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager contains an exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability that could allow remote attackers to view sensitive information on affected systems.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor (CWE-200) from the management plane. CISA KEV-listed 2026-04-20 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager fixed release; rotate any secrets that may have been exposed and restrict the management plane to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SD-WAN Manager management plane: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the SD-WAN Manager management plane.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-2749": {
     "name": "Kentico Xperience Path Traversal Vulnerability",
@@ -7191,35 +7247,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2026-20128": {
     "name": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager Storing Passwords in a Recoverable Format Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager contains a storing passwords in a recoverable format vulnerability that allows an authenticated, local attacker to gain DCA user privileges by accessing a credential file for the DCA user on the filesystem as a low-privileged user.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "storage of passwords in a recoverable format (CWE-257), allowing an attacker with access to recover credentials. CISA KEV-listed 2026-04-20 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager fixed release and rotate all credentials stored on or managed by the SD-WAN Manager.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SD-WAN Manager: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the SD-WAN Manager.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-32975": {
     "name": "Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
@@ -7379,35 +7463,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2026-32201": {
     "name": "Microsoft SharePoint Server Improper Input Validation Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Microsoft SharePoint Server contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "improper input validation (CWE-20) reachable by an unauthorized attacker, leading to compromise of the SharePoint server. CISA KEV-listed 2026-04-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Microsoft SharePoint Server security update; hunt for web shells and rotate machine keys, as SharePoint compromise is a known web-shell-persistence vector.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SharePoint Server surface: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the SharePoint Server surface.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Microsoft SharePoint Server is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2012-1854": {
     "name": "Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications Insecure Library Loading Vulnerability",
@@ -7746,35 +7858,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2026-35616": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiClient EMS Improper Access Control Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiClient EMS contains an improper access control vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "an improper access-control flaw (CWE-284) allowing an unauthenticated attacker to access functions or data beyond authorization. CISA KEV-listed 2026-04-06 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiClient EMS to the fixed build in the Fortinet PSIRT advisory; restrict the EMS management interface to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiClient EMS management server: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiClient EMS management server.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiClient EMS is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2026-3502": {
     "name": "TrueConf Client Download of Code Without Integrity Check Vulnerability",
@@ -11651,35 +11791,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2026-22769": {
     "name": "Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines (RP4VMs) Use of Hard-coded Credentials Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines (RP4VMs) contains an use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the underlying operating system and root-level persistence.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798), allowing an attacker to authenticate with built-in credentials. CISA KEV-listed 2026-02-18 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the affected system)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Dell RP4VMs update that removes/rotates the hard-coded credentials; restrict appliance management access and rotate any credentials reachable from it.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day cycle loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the RP4VMs appliance: requests matching the exploited weakness and unexpected privileged actions, data access, or new accounts on the system.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of instances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the RP4VMs appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing management/infrastructure system."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the system class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing system in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines (RP4VMs) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2020-7796": {
     "name": "Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability",
@@ -13227,35 +13395,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-59718": {
     "name": "Fortinet Multiple Products Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiOS, FortiSwitchMaster, FortiProxy, and FortiWeb contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the FortiCloud SSO login authentication via a crafted SAML message. Please be aware that CVE-2025-59719 pertains to the same problem and is mentioned in the same vendor advisory. Ensure to apply all patches mentioned in the advisory.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "improper verification of a cryptographic signature (CWE-347), allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass a signature check. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-16 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Fortinet PSIRT fixed builds for each affected product; restrict management interfaces to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Fortinet product surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the Fortinet product surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet (multiple products) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-14611": {
     "name": "Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox Hard Coded Cryptographic Vulnerability",
@@ -13707,67 +13903,123 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-58034": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb OS Command Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains an OS command Injection vulnerability that may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "OS command injection (CWE-78) giving an unauthenticated attacker command execution on the FortiWeb appliance. CISA KEV-listed 2025-11-18 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build in the Fortinet PSIRT advisory; restrict the management interface and review for unexpected process execution.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb management surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb management surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-64446": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb Path Traversal Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains a relative path traversal vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute administrative commands on the system via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a path-traversal flaw (CWE-23) on FortiWeb reachable by an unauthenticated attacker. CISA KEV-listed 2025-11-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build; restrict the management interface and audit for unauthorized file access.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-12480": {
     "name": "Gladinet Triofox Improper Access Control Vulnerability",
@@ -16171,35 +16423,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-25257": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiWeb SQL Injection Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiWeb contains a SQL injection vulnerability that may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "SQL injection (CWE-89) on the FortiWeb surface, reachable unauthenticated and escalating to compromise. CISA KEV-listed 2025-07-18 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiWeb to the fixed build; restrict the management interface to trusted networks.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiWeb surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiWeb surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiWeb is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-47812": {
     "name": "Wing FTP Server Improper Neutralization of Null Byte or NUL Character Vulnerability",
@@ -16523,35 +16803,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2019-6693": {
     "name": "Fortinet FortiOS Use of Hard-Coded Credentials Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiOS contains a use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability that could allow an attacker to cipher sensitive data in FortiOS configuration backup file via knowledge of the hard-coded key. ",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798) in FortiOS, allowing authentication with built-in credentials. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Upgrade FortiOS to a fixed build and rotate/replace any configuration encrypted under the default key; restrict management access.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FortiOS appliance: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the FortiOS appliance; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
-      "basis": "Known ransomware-campaign use; passing orgs typically still exposed when patch deployment lags KEV due date.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet FortiOS is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2024-0769": {
     "name": " D-Link DIR-859 Router Path Traversal Vulnerability",
@@ -17419,35 +17727,63 @@
   },
   "CVE-2025-32756": {
     "name": "Fortinet Multiple Products Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
-    "lesson_date": "2026-05-18",
+    "lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
     "attack_vector": {
-      "description": "Fortinet FortiFone, FortiVoice, FortiNDR and FortiMail contain a stack-based overflow vulnerability that may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests.",
-      "privileges_required": "network attacker (no authentication required)",
-      "complexity": "moderate (bulk-import default)",
-      "ai_factor": "Bulk-imported — AI-discovery provenance not surfaced in KEV. Detection method that surfaces this class: ADVISORIES_SOURCE (12 primary-source feeds) + CISA-KEV poller. Refine when researcher writeup publishes."
+      "description": "a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-124) across multiple Fortinet products, reachable by an unauthenticated attacker for remote code execution. CISA KEV-listed 2025-05-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
+      "privileges_required": "none (unauthenticated network reach to the appliance)",
+      "complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
+      "ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
+    },
+    "defense_chain": {
+      "prevention": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Fortinet PSIRT fixed builds for each affected product; where an immediate upgrade is not possible, disable the affected interface per the advisory workaround.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
+        "adequacy": "Patch is definitive once applied; the gap is the SLA — a 30-day appliance-patch cycle (often gated on a maintenance window) loses to the KEV-confirmed exploitation window."
+      },
+      "detection": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Fortinet product surface: requests matching the exploited weakness, appliance process crashes, and unexpected command execution or authentication events.",
+        "was_this_required": false,
+        "framework_requiring_it": null,
+        "adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation of appliances not yet patched within the compressed window."
+      },
+      "response": {
+        "what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately under the KEV SLA, then investigate for post-exploitation persistence and rotate credentials reachable from the Fortinet product surface; on indicators of compromise, consider rebuilding the appliance.",
+        "was_this_required": true,
+        "framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
+        "adequacy": "Mandatory for a KEV-listed unauthenticated appliance flaw; patch-in-place without compromise assessment can leave attacker persistence."
+      }
     },
     "framework_coverage": {
       "NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "30-day SLA inadequate for KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE; KEV due date is the operational clock."
+        "gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated network-appliance flaw; CISA KEV due dates are days, not a month."
       },
       "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
         "covered": true,
         "adequate": false,
-        "gap": "Standard does not differentiate routinely-disclosed CVE from KEV-listed actively-exploited CVE."
+        "gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an unauthenticated, actively-exploited flaw on an internet-facing security appliance."
+      },
+      "NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "Treats the appliance class as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA; operators learn of the flaw via vendor advisory, not a regulatory clock."
+      },
+      "PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
+        "covered": true,
+        "adequate": false,
+        "gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an unauthenticated flaw on a perimeter appliance in or adjacent to the CDE."
       }
     },
     "compliance_exposure_score": {
-      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 55,
-      "basis": "KEV-listed but not yet ransomware-attributed; exposure concentrated in orgs whose patch SLA defaults to NIST 30 days.",
+      "percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
+      "basis": "Internet-facing Fortinet (multiple products) is routinely run by audited organizations on a standard 30-day patch SLA, which was active exposure for this KEV-listed, actively-exploited flaw.",
       "theater_pattern": "patch_management"
     },
     "ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
-    "ai_discovery_source": "unknown",
-    "ai_assist_factor": "none",
-    "_auto_imported": true,
-    "_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
+    "ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
+    "ai_assist_factor": "none"
   },
   "CVE-2025-32709": {
     "name": "Microsoft Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Use-After-Free Vulnerability",