@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.15.33 → 0.15.35
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +8 -0
- package/data/_indexes/_meta.json +5 -5
- package/data/attack-techniques.json +14 -0
- package/data/cve-catalog.json +237 -83
- package/data/zeroday-lessons.json +581 -189
- package/manifest.json +44 -44
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/sbom.cdx.json +18 -18
|
@@ -13820,35 +13820,63 @@
|
|
|
13820
13820
|
},
|
|
13821
13821
|
"CVE-2019-19006": {
|
|
13822
13822
|
"name": " Sangoma FreePBX Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
13823
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
13823
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
13824
13824
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
13825
|
-
"description": "
|
|
13826
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
13827
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
13828
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
13825
|
+
"description": "an improper-authentication flaw (CWE-287) letting an unauthenticated attacker gain administrative access to the telephony server. CISA KEV-listed 2026-02-03 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
13826
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
13827
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
13828
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
13829
|
+
},
|
|
13830
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
13831
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
13832
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management/admin interface to a trusted network/jump host; monitor for unexpected admin sessions, and for the RCE case hunt for web shells and rotate credentials. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
13833
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
13834
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
13835
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; network restriction of the management plane is the compensating control, and MFA does not help once authentication is bypassed."
|
|
13836
|
+
},
|
|
13837
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
13838
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the FreePBX: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
13839
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
13840
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
13841
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
13842
|
+
},
|
|
13843
|
+
"response": {
|
|
13844
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and hunt for web shells and persistence.",
|
|
13845
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
13846
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
13847
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
13848
|
+
}
|
|
13829
13849
|
},
|
|
13830
13850
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
13831
13851
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
13832
13852
|
"covered": true,
|
|
13833
13853
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
13834
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
13854
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
13855
|
+
},
|
|
13856
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
13857
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
13858
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
13859
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
13835
13860
|
},
|
|
13836
13861
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
13837
13862
|
"covered": true,
|
|
13838
13863
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
13839
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
13864
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
13865
|
+
},
|
|
13866
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
13867
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
13868
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
13869
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
13840
13870
|
}
|
|
13841
13871
|
},
|
|
13842
13872
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
13843
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
13844
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
13845
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
13873
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
13874
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Sangoma FreePBX is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
13875
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
13846
13876
|
},
|
|
13847
13877
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
13848
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
13849
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
13850
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
13851
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
13878
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
13879
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
13852
13880
|
},
|
|
13853
13881
|
"CVE-2025-40551": {
|
|
13854
13882
|
"name": "SolarWinds Web Help Desk Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability (variant: CVE-2025-40551)",
|
|
@@ -15252,35 +15280,63 @@
|
|
|
15252
15280
|
},
|
|
15253
15281
|
"CVE-2025-58360": {
|
|
15254
15282
|
"name": "OSGeo GeoServer Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference Vulnerability",
|
|
15255
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
15283
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
15256
15284
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
15257
|
-
"description": "
|
|
15258
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
15259
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
15260
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
15285
|
+
"description": "an XML external entity (XXE) flaw (CWE-611) in OSGeo GeoServer, letting an unauthenticated attacker read server files and coerce server-side requests. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-11 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
15286
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
15287
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
15288
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
15289
|
+
},
|
|
15290
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
15291
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
15292
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the GeoServer update; disable external-entity resolution, restrict outbound access, and review which internal resources and files the XXE reached.",
|
|
15293
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15294
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
15295
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; egress filtering, metadata-endpoint blocking, and disabling external entities are the compensating controls that limit SSRF/XXE impact."
|
|
15296
|
+
},
|
|
15297
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
15298
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the GeoServer: exploit-shaped requests, server-side outbound requests to internal/metadata endpoints and out-of-root file reads.",
|
|
15299
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
15300
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
15301
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
15302
|
+
},
|
|
15303
|
+
"response": {
|
|
15304
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict egress, disable external entities, and review what internal resources/files the flaw reached, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
15305
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15306
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
15307
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
15308
|
+
}
|
|
15261
15309
|
},
|
|
15262
15310
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
15263
15311
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
15264
15312
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15265
15313
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15266
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
15314
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
15267
15315
|
},
|
|
15268
15316
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
15269
15317
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15270
15318
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15271
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
15319
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
15320
|
+
},
|
|
15321
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
15322
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15323
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15324
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
15325
|
+
},
|
|
15326
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
15327
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15328
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15329
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
15272
15330
|
}
|
|
15273
15331
|
},
|
|
15274
15332
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
15275
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
15276
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
15333
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
15334
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing OSGeo GeoServer is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
15277
15335
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
15278
15336
|
},
|
|
15279
15337
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
15280
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
15281
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15282
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
15283
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
15338
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
15339
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15284
15340
|
},
|
|
15285
15341
|
"CVE-2025-6218": {
|
|
15286
15342
|
"name": "RARLAB WinRAR Path Traversal Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -15491,35 +15547,63 @@
|
|
|
15491
15547
|
},
|
|
15492
15548
|
"CVE-2025-55182": {
|
|
15493
15549
|
"name": "Meta React Server Components Remote Code Execution Vulnerability",
|
|
15494
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
15550
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
15495
15551
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
15496
|
-
"description": "
|
|
15497
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
15498
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
15499
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
15552
|
+
"description": "a remote-code-execution flaw (CWE-94) in Meta's React Server Components, enabling code execution via crafted server-component input. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-05 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
15553
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
15554
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
15555
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
15556
|
+
},
|
|
15557
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
15558
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
15559
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Update React Server Components in every app that uses it; hunt for web shells and rotate application secrets — framework-level RCE reaches every consumer.",
|
|
15560
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15561
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
15562
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but insufficient alone — web shells and stolen credentials survive the patch; framework-level flaws require updating every consumer."
|
|
15563
|
+
},
|
|
15564
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
15565
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the React Server Components: exploit-shaped requests, new web-shell files and unexpected child-process execution.",
|
|
15566
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
15567
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
15568
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
15569
|
+
},
|
|
15570
|
+
"response": {
|
|
15571
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, hunt and remove web shells, rotate application secrets/credentials, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
15572
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15573
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
15574
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
15575
|
+
}
|
|
15500
15576
|
},
|
|
15501
15577
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
15502
15578
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
15503
15579
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15504
15580
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15505
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
15581
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
15506
15582
|
},
|
|
15507
15583
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
15508
15584
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15509
15585
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15510
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
15586
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
15587
|
+
},
|
|
15588
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
15589
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15590
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15591
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
15592
|
+
},
|
|
15593
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
15594
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15595
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15596
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
15511
15597
|
}
|
|
15512
15598
|
},
|
|
15513
15599
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
15514
15600
|
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
15515
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
15601
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Meta React Server Components is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
15516
15602
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
15517
15603
|
},
|
|
15518
15604
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
15519
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
15520
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15521
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
15522
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
15605
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
15606
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15523
15607
|
},
|
|
15524
15608
|
"CVE-2021-26828": {
|
|
15525
15609
|
"name": "OpenPLC ScadaBR Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -15753,35 +15837,63 @@
|
|
|
15753
15837
|
},
|
|
15754
15838
|
"CVE-2025-61757": {
|
|
15755
15839
|
"name": "Oracle Fusion Middleware Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability",
|
|
15756
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
15840
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
15757
15841
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
15758
|
-
"description": "
|
|
15759
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
15760
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
15761
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
15842
|
+
"description": "a missing-authentication-for-critical-function flaw (CWE-306) letting an unauthenticated attacker reach a critical function without credentials. CISA KEV-listed 2025-11-21 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
15843
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
15844
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
15845
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
15846
|
+
},
|
|
15847
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
15848
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
15849
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management/admin interface to a trusted network/jump host; monitor for unexpected admin sessions, and for the RCE case hunt for web shells and rotate credentials. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
15850
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15851
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
15852
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; network restriction of the management plane is the compensating control, and MFA does not help once authentication is bypassed."
|
|
15853
|
+
},
|
|
15854
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
15855
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Oracle Fusion Middleware: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
15856
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
15857
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
15858
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
15859
|
+
},
|
|
15860
|
+
"response": {
|
|
15861
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and hunt for web shells and persistence.",
|
|
15862
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15863
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
15864
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
15865
|
+
}
|
|
15762
15866
|
},
|
|
15763
15867
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
15764
15868
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
15765
15869
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15766
15870
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15767
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
15871
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
15872
|
+
},
|
|
15873
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
15874
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15875
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15876
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
15768
15877
|
},
|
|
15769
15878
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
15770
15879
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15771
15880
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15772
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
15881
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
15882
|
+
},
|
|
15883
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
15884
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15885
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15886
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
15773
15887
|
}
|
|
15774
15888
|
},
|
|
15775
15889
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
15776
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
15777
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
15778
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
15890
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
15891
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Oracle Fusion Middleware is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
15892
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
15779
15893
|
},
|
|
15780
15894
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
15781
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
15782
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15783
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
15784
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
15895
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
15896
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15785
15897
|
},
|
|
15786
15898
|
"CVE-2025-13223": {
|
|
15787
15899
|
"name": "Google Chromium V8 Type Confusion Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -16342,35 +16454,63 @@
|
|
|
16342
16454
|
},
|
|
16343
16455
|
"CVE-2025-24893": {
|
|
16344
16456
|
"name": "XWiki Platform Eval Injection Vulnerability",
|
|
16345
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
16457
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
16346
16458
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
16347
|
-
"description": "
|
|
16348
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
16349
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
16350
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
16459
|
+
"description": "an eval-injection flaw (CWE-95) in XWiki Platform, enabling unauthenticated remote code execution via a crafted document or search request. CISA KEV-listed 2025-10-30 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
16460
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
16461
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
16462
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
16463
|
+
},
|
|
16464
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
16465
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
16466
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the XWiki update; hunt for web shells and rotate credentials — wiki RCE is routinely used to deploy cryptominers and backdoors.",
|
|
16467
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
16468
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
16469
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but insufficient alone — web shells and stolen credentials survive the patch; framework-level flaws require updating every consumer."
|
|
16470
|
+
},
|
|
16471
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
16472
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the XWiki: exploit-shaped requests, new web-shell files and unexpected child-process execution.",
|
|
16473
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
16474
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
16475
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
16476
|
+
},
|
|
16477
|
+
"response": {
|
|
16478
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, hunt and remove web shells, rotate application secrets/credentials, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
16479
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
16480
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
16481
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
16482
|
+
}
|
|
16351
16483
|
},
|
|
16352
16484
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
16353
16485
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
16354
16486
|
"covered": true,
|
|
16355
16487
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
16356
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
16488
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
16357
16489
|
},
|
|
16358
16490
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
16359
16491
|
"covered": true,
|
|
16360
16492
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
16361
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
16493
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
16494
|
+
},
|
|
16495
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
16496
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
16497
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
16498
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
16499
|
+
},
|
|
16500
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
16501
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
16502
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
16503
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
16362
16504
|
}
|
|
16363
16505
|
},
|
|
16364
16506
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
16365
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
16366
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
16507
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
16508
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing XWiki Platform is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
16367
16509
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
16368
16510
|
},
|
|
16369
16511
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
16370
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
16371
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
16372
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
16373
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
16512
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
16513
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
16374
16514
|
},
|
|
16375
16515
|
"CVE-2025-6204": {
|
|
16376
16516
|
"name": "Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso Code Injection Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -16853,35 +16993,63 @@
|
|
|
16853
16993
|
},
|
|
16854
16994
|
"CVE-2025-61884": {
|
|
16855
16995
|
"name": "Oracle E-Business Suite Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability",
|
|
16856
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
16996
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
16857
16997
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
16858
|
-
"description": "
|
|
16859
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
16860
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
16861
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
16998
|
+
"description": "a server-side request forgery flaw (CWE-918) in Oracle E-Business Suite, letting an unauthenticated attacker coerce server-side requests to internal resources. CISA KEV-listed 2025-10-20 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
16999
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
17000
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
17001
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
17002
|
+
},
|
|
17003
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
17004
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
17005
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Oracle E-Business Suite update; enforce egress filtering and metadata-endpoint blocking, and review for internal-resource access — EBS sits adjacent to financial data.",
|
|
17006
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17007
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
17008
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; egress filtering, metadata-endpoint blocking, and disabling external entities are the compensating controls that limit SSRF/XXE impact."
|
|
17009
|
+
},
|
|
17010
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
17011
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Oracle E-Business Suite: exploit-shaped requests, server-side outbound requests to internal/metadata endpoints and out-of-root file reads.",
|
|
17012
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
17013
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
17014
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
17015
|
+
},
|
|
17016
|
+
"response": {
|
|
17017
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict egress, disable external entities, and review what internal resources/files the flaw reached, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
17018
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17019
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
17020
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
17021
|
+
}
|
|
16862
17022
|
},
|
|
16863
17023
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
16864
17024
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
16865
17025
|
"covered": true,
|
|
16866
17026
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
16867
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
17027
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
16868
17028
|
},
|
|
16869
17029
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
16870
17030
|
"covered": true,
|
|
16871
17031
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
16872
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
17032
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
17033
|
+
},
|
|
17034
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
17035
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17036
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17037
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
17038
|
+
},
|
|
17039
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
17040
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17041
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17042
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
16873
17043
|
}
|
|
16874
17044
|
},
|
|
16875
17045
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
16876
17046
|
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
16877
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
17047
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Oracle E-Business Suite is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
16878
17048
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
16879
17049
|
},
|
|
16880
17050
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
16881
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
16882
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
16883
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
16884
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
17051
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
17052
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
16885
17053
|
},
|
|
16886
17054
|
"CVE-2025-54253": {
|
|
16887
17055
|
"name": "Adobe Experience Manager Forms Code Execution Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -17087,35 +17255,63 @@
|
|
|
17087
17255
|
},
|
|
17088
17256
|
"CVE-2016-7836": {
|
|
17089
17257
|
"name": "SKYSEA Client View Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
17090
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
17258
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
17091
17259
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
17092
|
-
"description": "
|
|
17093
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
17094
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
17095
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
17260
|
+
"description": "an improper-authentication flaw (CWE-287) in the SKYSEA Client View management server, letting an unauthenticated attacker bypass authentication and reach privileged functionality. CISA KEV-listed 2025-10-14 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
17261
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
17262
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
17263
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
17264
|
+
},
|
|
17265
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
17266
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
17267
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management/admin interface to a trusted network/jump host; monitor for unexpected admin sessions, and for the RCE case hunt for web shells and rotate credentials. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
17268
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17269
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
17270
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; network restriction of the management plane is the compensating control, and MFA does not help once authentication is bypassed."
|
|
17271
|
+
},
|
|
17272
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
17273
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SKYSEA Client View: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
17274
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
17275
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
17276
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
17277
|
+
},
|
|
17278
|
+
"response": {
|
|
17279
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and hunt for web shells and persistence.",
|
|
17280
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17281
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
17282
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
17283
|
+
}
|
|
17096
17284
|
},
|
|
17097
17285
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
17098
17286
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
17099
17287
|
"covered": true,
|
|
17100
17288
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
17101
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
17289
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
17290
|
+
},
|
|
17291
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
17292
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17293
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17294
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
17102
17295
|
},
|
|
17103
17296
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
17104
17297
|
"covered": true,
|
|
17105
17298
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
17106
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
17299
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
17300
|
+
},
|
|
17301
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
17302
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17303
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17304
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
17107
17305
|
}
|
|
17108
17306
|
},
|
|
17109
17307
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
17110
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
17111
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
17112
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
17308
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
17309
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing SKYSEA Client View is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
17310
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
17113
17311
|
},
|
|
17114
17312
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
17115
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
17116
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
17117
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
17118
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
17313
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
17314
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
17119
17315
|
},
|
|
17120
17316
|
"CVE-2021-43798": {
|
|
17121
17317
|
"name": "Grafana Path Traversal Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -17749,35 +17945,63 @@
|
|
|
17749
17945
|
},
|
|
17750
17946
|
"CVE-2015-7755": {
|
|
17751
17947
|
"name": "Juniper ScreenOS Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
17752
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
17948
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
17753
17949
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
17754
|
-
"description": "
|
|
17755
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
17756
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
17757
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
17950
|
+
"description": "a hardcoded backdoor authentication credential (CWE-287) in Juniper ScreenOS, letting anyone with the planted password gain administrative SSH/Telnet access to the firewall (a supply-chain-planted backdoor). CISA KEV-listed 2025-10-02 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
17951
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
17952
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
17953
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
17954
|
+
},
|
|
17955
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
17956
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
17957
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management interface to a trusted network/jump host; because this grants access without credentials (and the BMC/backdoor sits below the OS), treat an exposed device as compromised — re-image/rebuild and rotate all secrets. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
17958
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17959
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
17960
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but a below-OS (BMC) or backdoored device must be treated as compromised and rebuilt; MFA and password policy are irrelevant to a bypass."
|
|
17961
|
+
},
|
|
17962
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
17963
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the ScreenOS firewall: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
17964
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
17965
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
17966
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
17967
|
+
},
|
|
17968
|
+
"response": {
|
|
17969
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and re-image the device/BMC (below-OS persistence survives OS reinstall).",
|
|
17970
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
17971
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
17972
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
17973
|
+
}
|
|
17758
17974
|
},
|
|
17759
17975
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
17760
17976
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
17761
17977
|
"covered": true,
|
|
17762
17978
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
17763
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
17979
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
17980
|
+
},
|
|
17981
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
17982
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17983
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17984
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
17764
17985
|
},
|
|
17765
17986
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
17766
17987
|
"covered": true,
|
|
17767
17988
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
17768
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
17989
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
17990
|
+
},
|
|
17991
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
17992
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
17993
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
17994
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
17769
17995
|
}
|
|
17770
17996
|
},
|
|
17771
|
-
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
17772
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
17773
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
17774
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
17775
|
-
},
|
|
17997
|
+
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
17998
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
17999
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Juniper ScreenOS is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
18000
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
18001
|
+
},
|
|
17776
18002
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
17777
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
17778
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
17779
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
17780
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
18003
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
18004
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
17781
18005
|
},
|
|
17782
18006
|
"CVE-2025-21043": {
|
|
17783
18007
|
"name": "Samsung Mobile Devices Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability (variant: CVE-2025-21043)",
|
|
@@ -18080,35 +18304,63 @@
|
|
|
18080
18304
|
},
|
|
18081
18305
|
"CVE-2021-21311": {
|
|
18082
18306
|
"name": "Adminer Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability",
|
|
18083
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
18307
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
18084
18308
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
18085
|
-
"description": "
|
|
18086
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
18087
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
18088
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
18309
|
+
"description": "a server-side request forgery flaw (CWE-918) in Adminer, letting an unauthenticated attacker coerce the server into making requests to internal resources. CISA KEV-listed 2025-09-29 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
18310
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
18311
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
18312
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
18313
|
+
},
|
|
18314
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
18315
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
18316
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Adminer update or restrict access to it; enforce egress filtering and block cloud-metadata endpoints, and review for internal-resource access via the SSRF.",
|
|
18317
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
18318
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
18319
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; egress filtering, metadata-endpoint blocking, and disabling external entities are the compensating controls that limit SSRF/XXE impact."
|
|
18320
|
+
},
|
|
18321
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
18322
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Adminer: exploit-shaped requests, server-side outbound requests to internal/metadata endpoints and out-of-root file reads.",
|
|
18323
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
18324
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
18325
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
18326
|
+
},
|
|
18327
|
+
"response": {
|
|
18328
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict egress, disable external entities, and review what internal resources/files the flaw reached, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
18329
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
18330
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
18331
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
18332
|
+
}
|
|
18089
18333
|
},
|
|
18090
18334
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
18091
18335
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
18092
18336
|
"covered": true,
|
|
18093
18337
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
18094
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
18338
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
18095
18339
|
},
|
|
18096
18340
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
18097
18341
|
"covered": true,
|
|
18098
18342
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
18099
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
18343
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
18344
|
+
},
|
|
18345
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
18346
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
18347
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
18348
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
18349
|
+
},
|
|
18350
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
18351
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
18352
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
18353
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
18100
18354
|
}
|
|
18101
18355
|
},
|
|
18102
18356
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
18103
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
18104
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
18357
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
18358
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Adminer is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
18105
18359
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
18106
18360
|
},
|
|
18107
18361
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
18108
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
18109
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
18110
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
18111
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
18362
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
18363
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
18112
18364
|
},
|
|
18113
18365
|
"CVE-2025-20362": {
|
|
18114
18366
|
"name": "Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security (ASA) Appliance and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Missing Authorization Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -18504,35 +18756,63 @@
|
|
|
18504
18756
|
},
|
|
18505
18757
|
"CVE-2020-24363": {
|
|
18506
18758
|
"name": "TP-link TL-WA855RE Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability",
|
|
18507
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
18759
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
18508
18760
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
18509
|
-
"description": "
|
|
18510
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
18511
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
18512
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
18761
|
+
"description": "a missing-authentication-for-critical-function flaw (CWE-306) on the TP-Link TL-WA855RE extender, letting an unauthenticated attacker on the network reset the device and gain administrative control. CISA KEV-listed 2025-09-02 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
18762
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
18763
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
18764
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
18765
|
+
},
|
|
18766
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
18767
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
18768
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management interface to a trusted network/jump host; because this grants access without credentials (and the BMC/backdoor sits below the OS), treat an exposed device as compromised — re-image/rebuild and rotate all secrets. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
18769
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
18770
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
18771
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but a below-OS (BMC) or backdoored device must be treated as compromised and rebuilt; MFA and password policy are irrelevant to a bypass."
|
|
18772
|
+
},
|
|
18773
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
18774
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the TL-WA855RE extender: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
18775
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
18776
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
18777
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
18778
|
+
},
|
|
18779
|
+
"response": {
|
|
18780
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and re-image the device/BMC (below-OS persistence survives OS reinstall).",
|
|
18781
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
18782
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
18783
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
18784
|
+
}
|
|
18513
18785
|
},
|
|
18514
18786
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
18515
18787
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
18516
18788
|
"covered": true,
|
|
18517
18789
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
18518
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
18790
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
18791
|
+
},
|
|
18792
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
18793
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
18794
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
18795
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
18519
18796
|
},
|
|
18520
18797
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
18521
18798
|
"covered": true,
|
|
18522
18799
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
18523
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
18800
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
18801
|
+
},
|
|
18802
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
18803
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
18804
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
18805
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
18524
18806
|
}
|
|
18525
18807
|
},
|
|
18526
18808
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
18527
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
18528
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
18529
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
18809
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
18810
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing TP-Link TL-WA855RE is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
18811
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
18530
18812
|
},
|
|
18531
18813
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
18532
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
18533
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
18534
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
18535
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
18814
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
18815
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
18536
18816
|
},
|
|
18537
18817
|
"CVE-2025-55177": {
|
|
18538
18818
|
"name": "Meta Platforms WhatsApp Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -20516,35 +20796,63 @@
|
|
|
20516
20796
|
},
|
|
20517
20797
|
"CVE-2024-54085": {
|
|
20518
20798
|
"name": "AMI MegaRAC SPx Authentication Bypass by Spoofing Vulnerability",
|
|
20519
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
20799
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
20520
20800
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
20521
|
-
"description": "AMI MegaRAC SPx
|
|
20522
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
20523
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
20524
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
20801
|
+
"description": "an authentication-bypass-by-spoofing flaw (CWE-290) in the AMI MegaRAC SPx baseboard management controller (Redfish), letting an unauthenticated attacker gain administrative control of the BMC — and thus the host beneath the operating system. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-25 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
20802
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
20803
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
20804
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
20805
|
+
},
|
|
20806
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
20807
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
20808
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management interface to a trusted network/jump host; because this grants access without credentials (and the BMC/backdoor sits below the OS), treat an exposed device as compromised — re-image/rebuild and rotate all secrets. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
20809
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
20810
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
20811
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but a below-OS (BMC) or backdoored device must be treated as compromised and rebuilt; MFA and password policy are irrelevant to a bypass."
|
|
20812
|
+
},
|
|
20813
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
20814
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the MegaRAC BMC: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
20815
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
20816
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
20817
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
20818
|
+
},
|
|
20819
|
+
"response": {
|
|
20820
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and re-image the device/BMC (below-OS persistence survives OS reinstall).",
|
|
20821
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
20822
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
20823
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
20824
|
+
}
|
|
20525
20825
|
},
|
|
20526
20826
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
20527
20827
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
20528
20828
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20529
20829
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20530
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
20830
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
20831
|
+
},
|
|
20832
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
20833
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
20834
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
20835
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
20531
20836
|
},
|
|
20532
20837
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
20533
20838
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20534
20839
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20535
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
20840
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
20841
|
+
},
|
|
20842
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
20843
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
20844
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
20845
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
20536
20846
|
}
|
|
20537
20847
|
},
|
|
20538
20848
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
20539
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
20540
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
20541
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
20849
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
20850
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing AMI MegaRAC SPx is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
20851
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
20542
20852
|
},
|
|
20543
20853
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
20544
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
20545
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20546
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
20547
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
20854
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
20855
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20548
20856
|
},
|
|
20549
20857
|
"CVE-2023-0386": {
|
|
20550
20858
|
"name": "Linux Kernel Improper Ownership Management Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -20750,35 +21058,63 @@
|
|
|
20750
21058
|
},
|
|
20751
21059
|
"CVE-2025-24016": {
|
|
20752
21060
|
"name": "Wazuh Server Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability",
|
|
20753
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
21061
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
20754
21062
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
20755
|
-
"description": "
|
|
20756
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
20757
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
20758
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
21063
|
+
"description": "a deserialization-of-untrusted-data flaw (CWE-502) on the Wazuh server API, enabling unauthenticated remote code execution on the security-monitoring server. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-10 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
21064
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
21065
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
21066
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
21067
|
+
},
|
|
21068
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
21069
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
21070
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the Wazuh update urgently and hunt for web shells — a compromised SIEM/XDR server can blind detection across the estate, so treat it as high-priority and rotate its credentials.",
|
|
21071
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21072
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
21073
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but insufficient alone — web shells and stolen credentials survive the patch; framework-level flaws require updating every consumer."
|
|
21074
|
+
},
|
|
21075
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
21076
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Wazuh server: exploit-shaped requests, new web-shell files and unexpected child-process execution.",
|
|
21077
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
21078
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
21079
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
21080
|
+
},
|
|
21081
|
+
"response": {
|
|
21082
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, hunt and remove web shells, rotate application secrets/credentials, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
21083
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21084
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
21085
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
21086
|
+
}
|
|
20759
21087
|
},
|
|
20760
21088
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
20761
21089
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
20762
21090
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20763
21091
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20764
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
21092
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
20765
21093
|
},
|
|
20766
21094
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
20767
21095
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20768
21096
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20769
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
21097
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
21098
|
+
},
|
|
21099
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
21100
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21101
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21102
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
21103
|
+
},
|
|
21104
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
21105
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21106
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21107
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
20770
21108
|
}
|
|
20771
21109
|
},
|
|
20772
21110
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
20773
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
20774
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
21111
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
21112
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Wazuh Server is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
20775
21113
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
20776
21114
|
},
|
|
20777
21115
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
20778
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
20779
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20780
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
20781
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
21116
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
21117
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20782
21118
|
},
|
|
20783
21119
|
"CVE-2024-42009": {
|
|
20784
21120
|
"name": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -20814,35 +21150,63 @@
|
|
|
20814
21150
|
},
|
|
20815
21151
|
"CVE-2025-32433": {
|
|
20816
21152
|
"name": "Erlang Erlang/OTP SSH Server Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability",
|
|
20817
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
21153
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
20818
21154
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
20819
|
-
"description": "
|
|
20820
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
20821
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
20822
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
21155
|
+
"description": "a missing-authentication-for-critical-function flaw (CWE-306) in the Erlang/OTP SSH server, letting an unauthenticated attacker run protocol messages before authentication for full remote code execution. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-09 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
21156
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw grants access without valid credentials)",
|
|
21157
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
21158
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
21159
|
+
},
|
|
21160
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
21161
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
21162
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update and restrict the management/admin interface to a trusted network/jump host; monitor for unexpected admin sessions, and for the RCE case hunt for web shells and rotate credentials. MFA does not mitigate an auth-bypass.",
|
|
21163
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21164
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
21165
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary; network restriction of the management plane is the compensating control, and MFA does not help once authentication is bypassed."
|
|
21166
|
+
},
|
|
21167
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
21168
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the Erlang/OTP SSH: admin sessions without a matching authentication event, use of known backdoor credentials, and configuration/account changes from unexpected sources.",
|
|
21169
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
21170
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
21171
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because an auth-bypass produces sessions that look authenticated; the anomaly is the absence of a legitimate credential event and the source."
|
|
21172
|
+
},
|
|
21173
|
+
"response": {
|
|
21174
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, restrict the management plane, rotate all credentials and keys, review configuration/account changes during the exposure window, and hunt for web shells and persistence.",
|
|
21175
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21176
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
21177
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; an auth-bypass typically leaves administrative persistence that a patch alone does not remove."
|
|
21178
|
+
}
|
|
20823
21179
|
},
|
|
20824
21180
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
20825
21181
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
20826
21182
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20827
21183
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20828
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
21184
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed authentication-bypass on an internet-facing system; these grant administrative access without credentials and are mass-exploited within days — the ScreenOS case shows the class also includes supply-chain-planted backdoors."
|
|
21185
|
+
},
|
|
21186
|
+
"NIST-800-53-IA-2-MFA": {
|
|
21187
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21188
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21189
|
+
"gap": "Multi-factor authentication does not help when the flaw bypasses authentication entirely (hardcoded backdoor, missing-auth endpoint, spoofable identity) — the control assumes the auth path is reached, which the flaw circumvents. Restricting the management plane to a trusted network/jump host is the load-bearing compensating control."
|
|
20829
21190
|
},
|
|
20830
21191
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
20831
21192
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20832
21193
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20833
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
21194
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited auth-bypass on an internet-facing system or appliance."
|
|
21195
|
+
},
|
|
21196
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-access-control": {
|
|
21197
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21198
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21199
|
+
"gap": "Treats access control as an essential-function requirement but assumes the authentication mechanism is sound; an auth-bypass defeats that assumption, and the framework lacks a compressed remediation SLA plus a compromised-device response for below-OS targets like a BMC."
|
|
20834
21200
|
}
|
|
20835
21201
|
},
|
|
20836
21202
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
20837
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
20838
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
20839
|
-
"theater_pattern": "
|
|
21203
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 78,
|
|
21204
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Erlang/OTP SSH Server is run by audited organizations whose access-control posture (passwords, MFA, RBAC) is irrelevant to an authentication bypass; without management-plane network restriction and prompt patching the system is exposed, and below-OS/backdoor cases require rebuild that is rarely performed.",
|
|
21205
|
+
"theater_pattern": "authentication_assumed_complete"
|
|
20840
21206
|
},
|
|
20841
21207
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
20842
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
20843
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20844
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
20845
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
21208
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
21209
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20846
21210
|
},
|
|
20847
21211
|
"CVE-2025-5419": {
|
|
20848
21212
|
"name": "Google Chromium V8 Out-of-Bounds Read and Write Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -21674,35 +22038,63 @@
|
|
|
21674
22038
|
},
|
|
21675
22039
|
"CVE-2025-42999": {
|
|
21676
22040
|
"name": "SAP NetWeaver Deserialization Vulnerability",
|
|
21677
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
22041
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
21678
22042
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
21679
|
-
"description": "
|
|
21680
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
21681
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
21682
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
22043
|
+
"description": "a deserialization-of-untrusted-data flaw (CWE-502) on SAP NetWeaver (Visual Composer), enabling unauthenticated remote code execution on the application server. CISA KEV-listed 2025-05-15 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
22044
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the flaw is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on the application's public interface)",
|
|
22045
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
22046
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
22047
|
+
},
|
|
22048
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
22049
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
22050
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the SAP NetWeaver update; hunt for web shells and rotate credentials — NetWeaver is business-critical and a compromise pivots into the ERP estate.",
|
|
22051
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
22052
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
22053
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but insufficient alone — web shells and stolen credentials survive the patch; framework-level flaws require updating every consumer."
|
|
22054
|
+
},
|
|
22055
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
22056
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring on the SAP NetWeaver: exploit-shaped requests, new web-shell files and unexpected child-process execution.",
|
|
22057
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
22058
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
22059
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary to catch exploitation and resident persistence after patching."
|
|
22060
|
+
},
|
|
22061
|
+
"response": {
|
|
22062
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Patch immediately, hunt and remove web shells, rotate application secrets/credentials, and review for lateral movement; for a compromised monitoring server (Wazuh) assume detection was blinded during the window.",
|
|
22063
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
22064
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
22065
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; patch-in-place without cleanup leaves the attacker resident or with a usable internal-access pivot."
|
|
22066
|
+
}
|
|
21683
22067
|
},
|
|
21684
22068
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
21685
22069
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
21686
22070
|
"covered": true,
|
|
21687
22071
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
21688
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
22072
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed, unauthenticated server-side flaw that processes untrusted data; deserialization/eval RCE and SSRF/XXE chains are mass-exploited within days."
|
|
21689
22073
|
},
|
|
21690
22074
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
21691
22075
|
"covered": true,
|
|
21692
22076
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
21693
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
22077
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard 30-day reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited, internet-facing application — and framework-level flaws (React Server Components) require updating every consumer."
|
|
22078
|
+
},
|
|
22079
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
22080
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
22081
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
22082
|
+
"gap": "Treats internet-facing applications as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA, and does not require the web-shell-hunt / secret-rotation / egress-restriction cleanup these flaws need — a compromised SIEM (Wazuh) additionally blinds the detection the framework assumes."
|
|
22083
|
+
},
|
|
22084
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
22085
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
22086
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
22087
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing application in or adjacent to the CDE (SAP/Oracle EBS sit adjacent to financial data); WAF coverage is partial mitigation, not remediation."
|
|
21694
22088
|
}
|
|
21695
22089
|
},
|
|
21696
22090
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
21697
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
21698
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
22091
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 75,
|
|
22092
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing SAP NetWeaver is run by audited organizations on a standard patch SLA and is mass-exploited within days; the required web-shell hunt, secret rotation, or egress/XXE hardening is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
21699
22093
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
21700
22094
|
},
|
|
21701
22095
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
21702
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
21703
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
21704
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
21705
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
22096
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
22097
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
21706
22098
|
},
|
|
21707
22099
|
"CVE-2024-12987": {
|
|
21708
22100
|
"name": "DrayTek Vigor Routers OS Command Injection Vulnerability",
|