@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.15.31 → 0.15.32
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +4 -0
- package/data/_indexes/_meta.json +5 -5
- package/data/attack-techniques.json +6 -0
- package/data/cve-catalog.json +117 -41
- package/data/zeroday-lessons.json +287 -91
- package/manifest.json +44 -44
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/sbom.cdx.json +18 -18
|
@@ -8516,35 +8516,63 @@
|
|
|
8516
8516
|
},
|
|
8517
8517
|
"CVE-2025-53521": {
|
|
8518
8518
|
"name": "F5 BIG-IP Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability",
|
|
8519
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
8519
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
8520
8520
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
8521
|
-
"description": "
|
|
8522
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
8523
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
8524
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
8521
|
+
"description": "a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker for memory-corruption remote code execution on the appliance. CISA KEV-listed 2026-03-27 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
8522
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
8523
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
8524
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
8525
|
+
},
|
|
8526
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
8527
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
8528
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update; treat an exploited appliance as fully compromised — rebuild it from a known-good image and rotate every credential, key, and session secret it held, since the appliance terminates trust for the network behind it.",
|
|
8529
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
8530
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
8531
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but an exploited appliance must be rebuilt and its secrets rotated — a patch in place does not evict a resident attacker from a device that fronts the network."
|
|
8532
|
+
},
|
|
8533
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
8534
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the BIG-IP: exploit-shaped requests, web shells, new processes, credential/config changes, and crashes.",
|
|
8535
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
8536
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
8537
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
8538
|
+
},
|
|
8539
|
+
"response": {
|
|
8540
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Rebuild the appliance from a known-good image, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
8541
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
8542
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
8543
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
8544
|
+
}
|
|
8525
8545
|
},
|
|
8526
8546
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
8527
8547
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
8528
8548
|
"covered": true,
|
|
8529
8549
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
8530
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
8550
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
8531
8551
|
},
|
|
8532
8552
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
8533
8553
|
"covered": true,
|
|
8534
8554
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
8535
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
8555
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
8556
|
+
},
|
|
8557
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
8558
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
8559
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
8560
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
8561
|
+
},
|
|
8562
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
8563
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
8564
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
8565
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
8536
8566
|
}
|
|
8537
8567
|
},
|
|
8538
8568
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
8539
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
8540
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
8569
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 77,
|
|
8570
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing F5 BIG-IP is a load-bearing edge/management appliance run on change-controlled patch windows; the required rebuild and secret rotation is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
8541
8571
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
8542
8572
|
},
|
|
8543
8573
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
8544
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
8545
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
8546
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
8547
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
8574
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
8575
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
8548
8576
|
},
|
|
8549
8577
|
"CVE-2026-33634": {
|
|
8550
8578
|
"name": "Aquasecurity Trivy Embedded Malicious Code Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -14358,35 +14386,63 @@
|
|
|
14358
14386
|
},
|
|
14359
14387
|
"CVE-2025-34026": {
|
|
14360
14388
|
"name": "Versa Concerto Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
14361
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
14389
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
14362
14390
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
14363
|
-
"description": "
|
|
14364
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
14365
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
14366
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
14391
|
+
"description": "an authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel (CWE-288) letting an unauthenticated attacker reach administrative functionality on the Versa Concerto SD-WAN orchestrator. CISA KEV-listed 2026-01-22 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
14392
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
14393
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
14394
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
14395
|
+
},
|
|
14396
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
14397
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
14398
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update; treat an exploited appliance as fully compromised — rebuild it from a known-good image and rotate every credential, key, and session secret it held, since the appliance terminates trust for the network behind it.",
|
|
14399
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14400
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
14401
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but an exploited appliance must be rebuilt and its secrets rotated — a patch in place does not evict a resident attacker from a device that fronts the network."
|
|
14402
|
+
},
|
|
14403
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
14404
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the Versa Concerto: exploit-shaped requests, web shells, new processes, credential/config changes, and crashes.",
|
|
14405
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
14406
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
14407
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
14408
|
+
},
|
|
14409
|
+
"response": {
|
|
14410
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Rebuild the appliance from a known-good image, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
14411
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14412
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
14413
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
14414
|
+
}
|
|
14367
14415
|
},
|
|
14368
14416
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
14369
14417
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
14370
14418
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14371
14419
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14372
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
14420
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
14373
14421
|
},
|
|
14374
14422
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
14375
14423
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14376
14424
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14377
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
14425
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
14426
|
+
},
|
|
14427
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
14428
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14429
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14430
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
14431
|
+
},
|
|
14432
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
14433
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14434
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14435
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
14378
14436
|
}
|
|
14379
14437
|
},
|
|
14380
14438
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
14381
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
14382
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
14439
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 77,
|
|
14440
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Versa Concerto is a load-bearing edge/management appliance run on change-controlled patch windows; the required rebuild and secret rotation is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
14383
14441
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
14384
14442
|
},
|
|
14385
14443
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
14386
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
14387
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14388
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
14389
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
14444
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
14445
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14390
14446
|
},
|
|
14391
14447
|
"CVE-2025-31125": {
|
|
14392
14448
|
"name": "Vite Vitejs Improper Access Control Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -14712,67 +14768,123 @@
|
|
|
14712
14768
|
},
|
|
14713
14769
|
"CVE-2025-37164": {
|
|
14714
14770
|
"name": "Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) OneView Code Injection Vulnerability",
|
|
14715
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
14771
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
14716
14772
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
14717
|
-
"description": "
|
|
14718
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
14719
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
14720
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
14773
|
+
"description": "a code-injection flaw (CWE-94) enabling unauthenticated remote code execution on the HPE OneView infrastructure-management appliance. CISA KEV-listed 2026-01-07 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
14774
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
14775
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
14776
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
14777
|
+
},
|
|
14778
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
14779
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
14780
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor update; treat an exploited appliance as fully compromised — rebuild it from a known-good image and rotate every credential, key, and session secret it held, since the appliance terminates trust for the network behind it.",
|
|
14781
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14782
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
14783
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but an exploited appliance must be rebuilt and its secrets rotated — a patch in place does not evict a resident attacker from a device that fronts the network."
|
|
14784
|
+
},
|
|
14785
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
14786
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the HPE OneView: exploit-shaped requests, web shells, new processes, credential/config changes, and crashes.",
|
|
14787
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
14788
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
14789
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
14790
|
+
},
|
|
14791
|
+
"response": {
|
|
14792
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Rebuild the appliance from a known-good image, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
14793
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14794
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
14795
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
14796
|
+
}
|
|
14721
14797
|
},
|
|
14722
14798
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
14723
14799
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
14724
14800
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14725
14801
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14726
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
14802
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
14727
14803
|
},
|
|
14728
14804
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
14729
14805
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14730
14806
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14731
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
14807
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
14808
|
+
},
|
|
14809
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
14810
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14811
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14812
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
14813
|
+
},
|
|
14814
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
14815
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14816
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14817
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
14732
14818
|
}
|
|
14733
14819
|
},
|
|
14734
14820
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
14735
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
14736
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
14821
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 77,
|
|
14822
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing HPE OneView is a load-bearing edge/management appliance run on change-controlled patch windows; the required rebuild and secret rotation is rarely part of the documented patch procedure.",
|
|
14737
14823
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
14738
14824
|
},
|
|
14739
14825
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
14740
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
14741
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14742
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
14743
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
14826
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
14827
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14744
14828
|
},
|
|
14745
14829
|
"CVE-2023-52163": {
|
|
14746
14830
|
"name": "Digiever DS-2105 Pro Missing Authorization Vulnerability",
|
|
14747
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
14831
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
14748
14832
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
14749
|
-
"description": "
|
|
14750
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
14751
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
14752
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
14833
|
+
"description": "a missing-authorization flaw (CWE-862) letting an unauthenticated attacker reach privileged functionality on the network video recorder. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-22 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
14834
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
14835
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
14836
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
14837
|
+
},
|
|
14838
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
14839
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
14840
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor firmware update; for end-of-life devices with no fix, replace them. After any suspected compromise, factory-reset and re-flash — embedded-device compromise persists in firmware/config, and these devices are recruited into botnets and operational-relay (ORB) infrastructure.",
|
|
14841
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14842
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
14843
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but EOL firmware often has no fix, making replacement the only remediation; compromised devices need re-flash, not just patch."
|
|
14844
|
+
},
|
|
14845
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
14846
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the Digiever DVR: exploit-shaped requests, anomalous outbound/botnet traffic and config drift.",
|
|
14847
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
14848
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
14849
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
14850
|
+
},
|
|
14851
|
+
"response": {
|
|
14852
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Factory-reset and re-flash or replace the device, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
14853
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
14854
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
14855
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
14856
|
+
}
|
|
14753
14857
|
},
|
|
14754
14858
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
14755
14859
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
14756
14860
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14757
14861
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14758
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
14862
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
14759
14863
|
},
|
|
14760
14864
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
14761
14865
|
"covered": true,
|
|
14762
14866
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
14763
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
14867
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
14868
|
+
},
|
|
14869
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
14870
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14871
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14872
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
14873
|
+
},
|
|
14874
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
14875
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
14876
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
14877
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
14764
14878
|
}
|
|
14765
14879
|
},
|
|
14766
14880
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
14767
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
14768
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
14881
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 80,
|
|
14882
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Digiever DS-2105 Pro is frequently unmanaged or end-of-life; audited organizations rarely track embedded-device firmware on a KEV SLA, and re-flash/replace is almost never part of a routine patch procedure.",
|
|
14769
14883
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
14770
14884
|
},
|
|
14771
14885
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
14772
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
14773
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14774
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
14775
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
14886
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
14887
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
14776
14888
|
},
|
|
14777
14889
|
"CVE-2025-14733": {
|
|
14778
14890
|
"name": "WatchGuard Firebox Out of Bounds Write Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -15080,35 +15192,63 @@
|
|
|
15080
15192
|
},
|
|
15081
15193
|
"CVE-2018-4063": {
|
|
15082
15194
|
"name": "Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Vulnerability",
|
|
15083
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
15195
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
15084
15196
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
15085
|
-
"description": "
|
|
15086
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
15087
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
15088
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
15197
|
+
"description": "an unrestricted file-upload flaw (CWE-434) letting an unauthenticated attacker upload a file (e.g. a web shell) for code execution on the cellular gateway. CISA KEV-listed 2025-12-12 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
15198
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
15199
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
15200
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
15201
|
+
},
|
|
15202
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
15203
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
15204
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor firmware update; for end-of-life devices with no fix, replace them. After any suspected compromise, factory-reset and re-flash — embedded-device compromise persists in firmware/config, and these devices are recruited into botnets and operational-relay (ORB) infrastructure.",
|
|
15205
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15206
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
15207
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but EOL firmware often has no fix, making replacement the only remediation; compromised devices need re-flash, not just patch."
|
|
15208
|
+
},
|
|
15209
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
15210
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the AirLink ALEOS gateway: exploit-shaped requests, anomalous outbound/botnet traffic and config drift.",
|
|
15211
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
15212
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
15213
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
15214
|
+
},
|
|
15215
|
+
"response": {
|
|
15216
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Factory-reset and re-flash or replace the device, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
15217
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
15218
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
15219
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
15220
|
+
}
|
|
15089
15221
|
},
|
|
15090
15222
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
15091
15223
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
15092
15224
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15093
15225
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15094
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
15226
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
15095
15227
|
},
|
|
15096
15228
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
15097
15229
|
"covered": true,
|
|
15098
15230
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
15099
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
15231
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
15232
|
+
},
|
|
15233
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
15234
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15235
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15236
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
15237
|
+
},
|
|
15238
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
15239
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
15240
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
15241
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
15100
15242
|
}
|
|
15101
15243
|
},
|
|
15102
15244
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
15103
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
15104
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
15245
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 80,
|
|
15246
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS is frequently unmanaged or end-of-life; audited organizations rarely track embedded-device firmware on a KEV SLA, and re-flash/replace is almost never part of a routine patch procedure.",
|
|
15105
15247
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
15106
15248
|
},
|
|
15107
15249
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
15108
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
15109
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15110
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
15111
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
15250
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
15251
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
15112
15252
|
},
|
|
15113
15253
|
"CVE-2025-58360": {
|
|
15114
15254
|
"name": "OSGeo GeoServer Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -20702,35 +20842,63 @@
|
|
|
20702
20842
|
},
|
|
20703
20843
|
"CVE-2021-32030": {
|
|
20704
20844
|
"name": "ASUS Routers Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
20705
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
20845
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
20706
20846
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
20707
|
-
"description": "
|
|
20708
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
20709
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
20710
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
20847
|
+
"description": "an improper-authentication flaw (CWE-287) letting an unauthenticated attacker bypass authentication on the router's administrative interface. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-02 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
20848
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
20849
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
20850
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
20851
|
+
},
|
|
20852
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
20853
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
20854
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor firmware update; for end-of-life devices with no fix, replace them. After any suspected compromise, factory-reset and re-flash — embedded-device compromise persists in firmware/config, and these devices are recruited into botnets and operational-relay (ORB) infrastructure.",
|
|
20855
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
20856
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
20857
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but EOL firmware often has no fix, making replacement the only remediation; compromised devices need re-flash, not just patch."
|
|
20858
|
+
},
|
|
20859
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
20860
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the ASUS router: exploit-shaped requests, anomalous outbound/botnet traffic and config drift.",
|
|
20861
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
20862
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
20863
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
20864
|
+
},
|
|
20865
|
+
"response": {
|
|
20866
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Factory-reset and re-flash or replace the device, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
20867
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
20868
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
20869
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
20870
|
+
}
|
|
20711
20871
|
},
|
|
20712
20872
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
20713
20873
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
20714
20874
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20715
20875
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20716
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
20876
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
20717
20877
|
},
|
|
20718
20878
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
20719
20879
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20720
20880
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20721
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
20881
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
20882
|
+
},
|
|
20883
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
20884
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
20885
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
20886
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
20887
|
+
},
|
|
20888
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
20889
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
20890
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
20891
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
20722
20892
|
}
|
|
20723
20893
|
},
|
|
20724
20894
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
20725
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
20726
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
20895
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 80,
|
|
20896
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing ASUS routers is frequently unmanaged or end-of-life; audited organizations rarely track embedded-device firmware on a KEV SLA, and re-flash/replace is almost never part of a routine patch procedure.",
|
|
20727
20897
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
20728
20898
|
},
|
|
20729
20899
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
20730
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
20731
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20732
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
20733
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
20900
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
20901
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20734
20902
|
},
|
|
20735
20903
|
"CVE-2025-3935": {
|
|
20736
20904
|
"name": "ConnectWise ScreenConnect Improper Authentication Vulnerability",
|
|
@@ -20886,35 +21054,63 @@
|
|
|
20886
21054
|
},
|
|
20887
21055
|
"CVE-2023-39780": {
|
|
20888
21056
|
"name": "ASUS RT-AX55 Routers OS Command Injection Vulnerability",
|
|
20889
|
-
"lesson_date": "2026-05-
|
|
21057
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-29",
|
|
20890
21058
|
"attack_vector": {
|
|
20891
|
-
"description": "
|
|
20892
|
-
"privileges_required": "
|
|
20893
|
-
"complexity": "
|
|
20894
|
-
"ai_factor": "
|
|
21059
|
+
"description": "an OS command-injection flaw (CWE-78) enabling unauthenticated remote command execution on the router. CISA KEV-listed 2025-06-02 with confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.",
|
|
21060
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (the device/appliance is reachable by an unauthenticated attacker on its network interface)",
|
|
21061
|
+
"complexity": "low — KEV-listed, actively exploited; treat as weaponized",
|
|
21062
|
+
"ai_factor": "No AI involvement documented in discovery or weaponization."
|
|
21063
|
+
},
|
|
21064
|
+
"defense_chain": {
|
|
21065
|
+
"prevention": {
|
|
21066
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Apply the vendor firmware update; for end-of-life devices with no fix, replace them. After any suspected compromise, factory-reset and re-flash — embedded-device compromise persists in firmware/config, and these devices are recruited into botnets and operational-relay (ORB) infrastructure.",
|
|
21067
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21068
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "CISA BOD 22-01 (KEV remediation)",
|
|
21069
|
+
"adequacy": "Patch is necessary but EOL firmware often has no fix, making replacement the only remediation; compromised devices need re-flash, not just patch."
|
|
21070
|
+
},
|
|
21071
|
+
"detection": {
|
|
21072
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Monitoring of the ASUS router: exploit-shaped requests, anomalous outbound/botnet traffic and config drift.",
|
|
21073
|
+
"was_this_required": false,
|
|
21074
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": null,
|
|
21075
|
+
"adequacy": "Necessary because device/appliance compromise is often silent and persists across reboots in firmware/config."
|
|
21076
|
+
},
|
|
21077
|
+
"response": {
|
|
21078
|
+
"what_would_have_worked": "Factory-reset and re-flash or replace the device, rotate all credentials and secrets it held, and review the network behind it for lateral movement; assume the device's trust is fully compromised.",
|
|
21079
|
+
"was_this_required": true,
|
|
21080
|
+
"framework_requiring_it": "NIST 800-53 IR-4",
|
|
21081
|
+
"adequacy": "Mandatory; network-device/appliance compromise gives an attacker a durable, trusted position that patching alone does not remove."
|
|
21082
|
+
}
|
|
20895
21083
|
},
|
|
20896
21084
|
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
20897
21085
|
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
20898
21086
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20899
21087
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20900
|
-
"gap": "30-day SLA
|
|
21088
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day flaw-remediation SLA is far longer than the observed exploitation window for a KEV-listed unauthenticated flaw on an internet-facing network device/appliance; consumer/embedded devices are mass-exploited into botnets within days (some end-of-life with no fix), and enterprise appliances are change-window-gated and exposed past the KEV due date."
|
|
20901
21089
|
},
|
|
20902
21090
|
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": {
|
|
20903
21091
|
"covered": true,
|
|
20904
21092
|
"adequate": false,
|
|
20905
|
-
"gap": "
|
|
21093
|
+
"gap": "'Appropriate timescales' is undefined; the standard reading is unsafe for an actively-exploited internet-facing device, and unmanaged/EOL devices fall outside most patch programs entirely."
|
|
21094
|
+
},
|
|
21095
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-network-security": {
|
|
21096
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21097
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21098
|
+
"gap": "Treats network devices/appliances as essential-function infrastructure but lacks a CISA-KEV-style compressed remediation SLA and does not address end-of-life devices that can only be replaced, or appliance compromise that requires rebuild rather than patch-in-place."
|
|
21099
|
+
},
|
|
21100
|
+
"PCI-DSS-4.0-6.3.3": {
|
|
21101
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
21102
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
21103
|
+
"gap": "The 30-day critical-patch window is exploitation acceptance for an internet-facing network device or edge appliance fronting or bridging the CDE."
|
|
20906
21104
|
}
|
|
20907
21105
|
},
|
|
20908
21106
|
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
20909
|
-
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed":
|
|
20910
|
-
"basis": "
|
|
21107
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 80,
|
|
21108
|
+
"basis": "Internet-facing ASUS RT-AX55 routers is frequently unmanaged or end-of-life; audited organizations rarely track embedded-device firmware on a KEV SLA, and re-flash/replace is almost never part of a routine patch procedure.",
|
|
20911
21109
|
"theater_pattern": "patch_management"
|
|
20912
21110
|
},
|
|
20913
21111
|
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
20914
|
-
"ai_discovery_source": "
|
|
20915
|
-
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20916
|
-
"_auto_imported": true,
|
|
20917
|
-
"_intake_method": "v0.13.17-bulk-cisa-kev-import"
|
|
21112
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "vendor_research",
|
|
21113
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none"
|
|
20918
21114
|
},
|
|
20919
21115
|
"CVE-2025-4632": {
|
|
20920
21116
|
"name": "Samsung MagicINFO 9 Server Path Traversal Vulnerability (variant: CVE-2025-4632)",
|