@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.13.90 → 0.13.92
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +8 -0
- package/data/_indexes/_meta.json +9 -9
- package/data/_indexes/activity-feed.json +2 -2
- package/data/_indexes/catalog-summaries.json +2 -2
- package/data/_indexes/chains.json +1297 -0
- package/data/atlas-ttps.json +3 -0
- package/data/attack-techniques.json +6 -0
- package/data/cve-catalog.json +310 -0
- package/data/cwe-catalog.json +4 -0
- package/data/framework-control-gaps.json +24 -0
- package/data/zeroday-lessons.json +150 -0
- package/manifest.json +44 -44
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/sbom.cdx.json +25 -25
package/data/atlas-ttps.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -278,6 +278,8 @@
|
|
|
278
278
|
"CVE-2024-11392",
|
|
279
279
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
280
280
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
281
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
282
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
281
283
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
282
284
|
"CVE-2024-42479",
|
|
283
285
|
"CVE-2024-50050",
|
|
@@ -384,6 +386,7 @@
|
|
|
384
386
|
"cve_refs": [
|
|
385
387
|
"CVE-2021-26829",
|
|
386
388
|
"CVE-2024-11182",
|
|
389
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
387
390
|
"CVE-2024-27443",
|
|
388
391
|
"CVE-2024-42009",
|
|
389
392
|
"CVE-2025-0133",
|
|
@@ -852,6 +855,8 @@
|
|
|
852
855
|
"CVE-2024-12987",
|
|
853
856
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
854
857
|
"CVE-2024-1709",
|
|
858
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
859
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
855
860
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
856
861
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
857
862
|
"CVE-2024-37079",
|
|
@@ -2481,6 +2486,7 @@
|
|
|
2481
2486
|
"name": "Drive-by Compromise",
|
|
2482
2487
|
"version": "v19",
|
|
2483
2488
|
"cve_refs": [
|
|
2489
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
2484
2490
|
"CVE-2025-10585",
|
|
2485
2491
|
"CVE-2025-14174",
|
|
2486
2492
|
"CVE-2025-24201",
|
package/data/cve-catalog.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -13817,6 +13817,316 @@
|
|
|
13817
13817
|
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
|
|
13818
13818
|
"_kev_short_description": "vLLM binds its multi-node XPUB ZeroMQ socket to all interfaces (CWE-770), exposing broadcast data and enabling DoS; fixed in 0.8.5."
|
|
13819
13819
|
},
|
|
13820
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132": {
|
|
13821
|
+
"name": "MLflow Recipe Template Injection XSS to Client-Side RCE",
|
|
13822
|
+
"type": "RCE",
|
|
13823
|
+
"cvss_score": 9.6,
|
|
13824
|
+
"cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
|
|
13825
|
+
"cvss_note": "NVD CVSS v3.1 base 9.6 (CRITICAL, Scope:Changed). Insufficient sanitization of template variables when running an untrusted MLflow recipe leads to stored XSS and client-side code execution in the victim's browser/session.",
|
|
13826
|
+
"cisa_kev": false,
|
|
13827
|
+
"poc_available": true,
|
|
13828
|
+
"poc_description": "Documented in the HiddenLayer security advisory and the MLflow GitHub advisory: running an untrusted MLflow recipe renders attacker-controlled template variables without sanitization, executing JavaScript in the victim's MLflow session (XSS, CWE-79) and enabling client-side remote code execution.",
|
|
13829
|
+
"ai_discovered": false,
|
|
13830
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
13831
|
+
"ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed via HiddenLayer / the MLflow project. The abused surface is the recipe-rendering UI of MLflow, a widely used MLOps experiment-tracking platform.",
|
|
13832
|
+
"ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
|
|
13833
|
+
"ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; template injection / XSS in the MLOps platform UI.",
|
|
13834
|
+
"active_exploitation": "none",
|
|
13835
|
+
"active_exploitation_notes": "Advisory disclosure with a coordinated fix; no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation reported as of curation.",
|
|
13836
|
+
"affected": "MLflow up to and including 2.9.2 (fixed in 2.10.0).",
|
|
13837
|
+
"affected_versions": [
|
|
13838
|
+
"MLflow <= 2.9.2"
|
|
13839
|
+
],
|
|
13840
|
+
"vector": "MLflow does not sufficiently sanitize template variables when rendering a recipe, so an untrusted recipe injects script that executes in the victim's MLflow session (CWE-79 stored XSS, rooted in template injection / CWE-94). Because the MLflow UI is a privileged control surface, the resulting client-side code execution can pivot to tracking-server actions.",
|
|
13841
|
+
"complexity": "low",
|
|
13842
|
+
"complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / PR:N / UI:R — requires a victim to run/view an untrusted recipe.",
|
|
13843
|
+
"patch_available": true,
|
|
13844
|
+
"patch_required_reboot": false,
|
|
13845
|
+
"live_patch_available": false,
|
|
13846
|
+
"live_patch_tools": [],
|
|
13847
|
+
"live_patch_notes": "Remediation is upgrading MLflow to 2.10.0 or later; redeploy, no host reboot.",
|
|
13848
|
+
"vendor_update_paths": [
|
|
13849
|
+
"Upgrade MLflow to 2.10.0 or later. Do not run or render untrusted recipes, and do not expose the MLflow UI / tracking server to untrusted users."
|
|
13850
|
+
],
|
|
13851
|
+
"framework_control_gaps": {
|
|
13852
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": "Flaw-remediation cadence does not track the MLOps experiment-tracking platform as managed, user-facing software.",
|
|
13853
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-10": "Output-encoding / input-sanitization control is not applied to recipe template variables rendered in the MLflow UI.",
|
|
13854
|
+
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": "Vulnerability management rarely enumerates the MLOps platform's recipe-rendering UI as an injection surface.",
|
|
13855
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-patch-management": "Article 21 measures do not reach the MLOps platform UI as a privileged control surface.",
|
|
13856
|
+
"DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model XSS-to-RCE in an MLOps platform as an ICT-risk event.",
|
|
13857
|
+
"UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for output-encoding untrusted content in the MLOps UI.",
|
|
13858
|
+
"AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out MLOps experiment-tracking platforms.",
|
|
13859
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an untrusted MLflow recipe's template content as untrusted input requiring sanitization before rendering; the MLOps UI is a privileged surface."
|
|
13860
|
+
},
|
|
13861
|
+
"atlas_refs": [
|
|
13862
|
+
"AML.T0049"
|
|
13863
|
+
],
|
|
13864
|
+
"attack_refs": [
|
|
13865
|
+
"T1189",
|
|
13866
|
+
"T1059.007"
|
|
13867
|
+
],
|
|
13868
|
+
"rwep_score": 29,
|
|
13869
|
+
"rwep_factors": {
|
|
13870
|
+
"cisa_kev": 0,
|
|
13871
|
+
"poc_available": 20,
|
|
13872
|
+
"ai_factor": 0,
|
|
13873
|
+
"active_exploitation": 0,
|
|
13874
|
+
"blast_radius": 24,
|
|
13875
|
+
"patch_available": -15,
|
|
13876
|
+
"live_patch_available": 0,
|
|
13877
|
+
"reboot_required": 0
|
|
13878
|
+
},
|
|
13879
|
+
"rwep_notes": "Standard (RWEP 29, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, patched at/after disclosure (Hard Rule #3). poc_available=20 + blast_radius=24 (MLflow is a widely used MLOps platform) minus patch 15. Note: NVD rates 9.6 CRITICAL; the client-side-RCE-via-XSS chain requires a victim to run an untrusted recipe (UI:R).",
|
|
13880
|
+
"epss_score": null,
|
|
13881
|
+
"epss_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
13882
|
+
"epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
|
|
13883
|
+
"epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
13884
|
+
"cwe_refs": [
|
|
13885
|
+
"CWE-79",
|
|
13886
|
+
"CWE-94"
|
|
13887
|
+
],
|
|
13888
|
+
"iocs": {
|
|
13889
|
+
"behavioral": [
|
|
13890
|
+
"An MLflow recipe containing script / HTML in template-variable fields rendered by the MLflow UI.",
|
|
13891
|
+
"JavaScript executing in an MLflow user's session after viewing/running a recipe from an untrusted source.",
|
|
13892
|
+
"Tracking-server actions (model registration, deletion) originating from a user's session shortly after rendering an untrusted recipe.",
|
|
13893
|
+
"MLflow <= 2.9.2 with the recipe UI reachable by untrusted users — the exposed precondition."
|
|
13894
|
+
],
|
|
13895
|
+
"_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures derived from NVD CVE-2024-27132 (CWE-79) and the HiddenLayer / MLflow GitHub security advisory. The unsanitized recipe template variable rendered in the UI is the indicator anchor."
|
|
13896
|
+
},
|
|
13897
|
+
"source_verified": "2026-05-25",
|
|
13898
|
+
"verification_sources": [
|
|
13899
|
+
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
13900
|
+
"https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/security/advisories"
|
|
13901
|
+
],
|
|
13902
|
+
"vendor_advisories": [
|
|
13903
|
+
{
|
|
13904
|
+
"vendor": "HiddenLayer / MLflow advisory",
|
|
13905
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
13906
|
+
"url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/security/advisories",
|
|
13907
|
+
"severity": "critical",
|
|
13908
|
+
"published_date": "2024-02-23"
|
|
13909
|
+
},
|
|
13910
|
+
{
|
|
13911
|
+
"vendor": "NVD",
|
|
13912
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
13913
|
+
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
13914
|
+
"severity": "critical",
|
|
13915
|
+
"published_date": "2024-02-23"
|
|
13916
|
+
}
|
|
13917
|
+
],
|
|
13918
|
+
"last_updated": "2026-05-25",
|
|
13919
|
+
"discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from NVD (CWE-79; NIST CVSS 9.6) + the HiddenLayer / MLflow security advisory. MLflow recipe template-injection XSS to client-side RCE; complements the existing MLflow path-traversal entry (CVE-2023-43472).",
|
|
13920
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
13921
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
|
|
13922
|
+
"_kev_short_description": "MLflow renders untrusted recipe template variables without sanitization (CWE-79), executing script in the victim's session for client-side RCE; fixed in 2.10.0."
|
|
13923
|
+
},
|
|
13924
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575": {
|
|
13925
|
+
"name": "ComfyUI-Impact-Pack Path Traversal Arbitrary File Write to RCE",
|
|
13926
|
+
"type": "RCE",
|
|
13927
|
+
"cvss_score": 8.6,
|
|
13928
|
+
"cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
|
|
13929
|
+
"cvss_note": "NVD CVSS v3.1 base 8.6 (HIGH, Scope:Changed, integrity-only). Missing validation of image.filename on /upload/temp allows path-traversal arbitrary file write (CWE-35).",
|
|
13930
|
+
"cisa_kev": false,
|
|
13931
|
+
"poc_available": true,
|
|
13932
|
+
"poc_description": "Public exploitation research exists (Snyk Labs, 'Don't Get Too Comfortable: Hacking ComfyUI Through Custom Nodes'): an unauthenticated /upload/temp request with a traversal filename writes a .py into ./custom_nodes for RCE on restart.",
|
|
13933
|
+
"ai_discovered": false,
|
|
13934
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
13935
|
+
"ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed by Snyk Labs research into the ComfyUI custom-node ecosystem. The abused surface is a popular ComfyUI custom node; ComfyUI auto-loads node code, so custom nodes are an execution boundary.",
|
|
13936
|
+
"ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
|
|
13937
|
+
"ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; path-traversal file write in a ComfyUI custom node.",
|
|
13938
|
+
"active_exploitation": "none",
|
|
13939
|
+
"active_exploitation_notes": "Research disclosure with coordinated fixes. Note the broader context: in April 2026, reporting described a cryptomining botnet mass-targeting internet-exposed ComfyUI instances via the custom-node attack surface (ComfyUI-Manager install endpoint); this specific CVE is not confirmed as that campaign's vector, but it is the same exposed-custom-node class.",
|
|
13940
|
+
"affected": "ComfyUI-Impact-Pack (the /upload/temp handler) prior to the patched release (GHSA-6mx8-m8xp-f2vc).",
|
|
13941
|
+
"affected_versions": [
|
|
13942
|
+
"ComfyUI-Impact-Pack (pre-fix, GHSA-6mx8-m8xp-f2vc)"
|
|
13943
|
+
],
|
|
13944
|
+
"vector": "ComfyUI-Impact-Pack does not validate the image.filename field in a POST to /upload/temp, so an unauthenticated attacker writes a file to an arbitrary path (CWE-35 path traversal). Dropping a .py file into ComfyUI's ./custom_nodes directory, which is auto-loaded on restart, escalates the write to remote code execution.",
|
|
13945
|
+
"complexity": "low",
|
|
13946
|
+
"complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / PR:N — unauthenticated against a reachable ComfyUI instance.",
|
|
13947
|
+
"patch_available": true,
|
|
13948
|
+
"patch_required_reboot": false,
|
|
13949
|
+
"live_patch_available": false,
|
|
13950
|
+
"live_patch_tools": [],
|
|
13951
|
+
"live_patch_notes": "Remediation is updating the custom node to its patched version (custom nodes are git-versioned; pull the fix commit) and restarting ComfyUI.",
|
|
13952
|
+
"vendor_update_paths": [
|
|
13953
|
+
"Update the affected ComfyUI custom node to its patched version, never expose ComfyUI to untrusted networks, treat custom nodes as code (review before install), and run ComfyUI as a least-privilege user."
|
|
13954
|
+
],
|
|
13955
|
+
"framework_control_gaps": {
|
|
13956
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": "Flaw-remediation cadence does not track third-party ComfyUI custom nodes as managed, RCE-bearing software.",
|
|
13957
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7": "Boundary-protection control does not flag internet-exposed ComfyUI instances as a custom-node RCE surface.",
|
|
13958
|
+
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": "Vulnerability management rarely enumerates ComfyUI custom nodes (which auto-load and run code) as an in-scope execution surface.",
|
|
13959
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-patch-management": "Article 21 measures do not reach third-party AI-tool plugins as a privileged execution control plane.",
|
|
13960
|
+
"DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model custom-node RCE in an AI image-generation tool as an ICT-risk event.",
|
|
13961
|
+
"UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for treating AI-tool custom nodes / plugins as code requiring review.",
|
|
13962
|
+
"AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out third-party AI-tool extensions.",
|
|
13963
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an AI tool's auto-loaded custom nodes / plugins as an untrusted-code supply-chain and execution surface; a single vulnerable node is unauthenticated RCE."
|
|
13964
|
+
},
|
|
13965
|
+
"atlas_refs": [
|
|
13966
|
+
"AML.T0049"
|
|
13967
|
+
],
|
|
13968
|
+
"attack_refs": [
|
|
13969
|
+
"T1190",
|
|
13970
|
+
"T1059"
|
|
13971
|
+
],
|
|
13972
|
+
"rwep_score": 29,
|
|
13973
|
+
"rwep_factors": {
|
|
13974
|
+
"cisa_kev": 0,
|
|
13975
|
+
"poc_available": 20,
|
|
13976
|
+
"ai_factor": 0,
|
|
13977
|
+
"active_exploitation": 0,
|
|
13978
|
+
"blast_radius": 24,
|
|
13979
|
+
"patch_available": -15,
|
|
13980
|
+
"live_patch_available": 0,
|
|
13981
|
+
"reboot_required": 0
|
|
13982
|
+
},
|
|
13983
|
+
"rwep_notes": "Standard (RWEP 29, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, patched at/after disclosure (Hard Rule #3); active_exploitation kept 'none' for this specific CVE despite the broader ComfyUI botnet campaign (unconfirmed vector). poc_available=20 + blast_radius=24 (ComfyUI is a widely deployed AI image-generation tool) minus patch 15.",
|
|
13984
|
+
"epss_score": null,
|
|
13985
|
+
"epss_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
13986
|
+
"epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
|
|
13987
|
+
"epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
13988
|
+
"cwe_refs": [
|
|
13989
|
+
"CWE-35"
|
|
13990
|
+
],
|
|
13991
|
+
"iocs": {
|
|
13992
|
+
"behavioral": [
|
|
13993
|
+
"POST requests to /upload/temp on a ComfyUI instance with traversal sequences or a .py extension in image.filename.",
|
|
13994
|
+
"New or modified .py files appearing in ComfyUI's ./custom_nodes directory not from a known install.",
|
|
13995
|
+
"Code execution after a ComfyUI restart correlated with a prior file-upload request.",
|
|
13996
|
+
"ComfyUI exposed to untrusted networks with the affected custom node installed — the exposed precondition."
|
|
13997
|
+
],
|
|
13998
|
+
"_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures derived from NVD CVE-2024-21575 (CWE-35) and Snyk Labs' ComfyUI custom-node research (https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/) and GHSA-6mx8-m8xp-f2vc."
|
|
13999
|
+
},
|
|
14000
|
+
"source_verified": "2026-05-25",
|
|
14001
|
+
"verification_sources": [
|
|
14002
|
+
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
14003
|
+
"https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/"
|
|
14004
|
+
],
|
|
14005
|
+
"vendor_advisories": [
|
|
14006
|
+
{
|
|
14007
|
+
"vendor": "Snyk Labs / GitHub Advisory",
|
|
14008
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
14009
|
+
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6mx8-m8xp-f2vc",
|
|
14010
|
+
"severity": "high",
|
|
14011
|
+
"published_date": "2024-12-12"
|
|
14012
|
+
},
|
|
14013
|
+
{
|
|
14014
|
+
"vendor": "NVD",
|
|
14015
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
14016
|
+
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
14017
|
+
"severity": "high",
|
|
14018
|
+
"published_date": "2024-12-12"
|
|
14019
|
+
}
|
|
14020
|
+
],
|
|
14021
|
+
"last_updated": "2026-05-25",
|
|
14022
|
+
"discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from NVD (CWE-35; NIST CVSS 8.6) + Snyk Labs' ComfyUI custom-node research. Member of the ComfyUI custom-node RCE family (auto-loaded node code as an unauthenticated execution surface).",
|
|
14023
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
14024
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
|
|
14025
|
+
"_kev_short_description": "ComfyUI-Impact-Pack's /upload/temp lacks filename validation (CWE-35), letting an unauthenticated attacker write to ./custom_nodes for auto-loaded RCE."
|
|
14026
|
+
},
|
|
14027
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576": {
|
|
14028
|
+
"name": "ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes Workflow Code Injection RCE",
|
|
14029
|
+
"type": "RCE",
|
|
14030
|
+
"cvss_score": 10,
|
|
14031
|
+
"cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
|
|
14032
|
+
"cvss_note": "NVD CVSS v3.1 base 10.0 (CRITICAL, Scope:Changed). A validation bypass in the BuildColorRangeHSVAdvanced / FilterContour / FindContour custom nodes reaches a dynamic-code-evaluation call on a crafted workflow string (CWE-94 code injection).",
|
|
14033
|
+
"cisa_kev": false,
|
|
14034
|
+
"poc_available": true,
|
|
14035
|
+
"poc_description": "Public exploitation research exists (Snyk Labs, 'Don't Get Too Comfortable: Hacking ComfyUI Through Custom Nodes'): a crafted workflow reaches the node's dynamic-code-evaluation path to execute arbitrary code.",
|
|
14036
|
+
"ai_discovered": false,
|
|
14037
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
14038
|
+
"ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed by Snyk Labs research into the ComfyUI custom-node ecosystem. The abused surface is a popular ComfyUI custom node; ComfyUI auto-loads node code, so custom nodes are an execution boundary.",
|
|
14039
|
+
"ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
|
|
14040
|
+
"ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; code injection via dynamic evaluation in a ComfyUI custom node.",
|
|
14041
|
+
"active_exploitation": "none",
|
|
14042
|
+
"active_exploitation_notes": "Research disclosure with coordinated fixes. Note the broader context: in April 2026, reporting described a cryptomining botnet mass-targeting internet-exposed ComfyUI instances via the custom-node attack surface (ComfyUI-Manager install endpoint); this specific CVE is not confirmed as that campaign's vector, but it is the same exposed-custom-node class.",
|
|
14043
|
+
"affected": "ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes prior to the patched release.",
|
|
14044
|
+
"affected_versions": [
|
|
14045
|
+
"ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes (pre-fix)"
|
|
14046
|
+
],
|
|
14047
|
+
"vector": "ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes' BuildColorRangeHSVAdvanced, FilterContour and FindContour nodes bypass validation and pass a workflow-supplied string to a dynamic-code-evaluation call (eval(), CWE-94). A crafted ComfyUI workflow therefore executes arbitrary Python on the host with no authentication.",
|
|
14048
|
+
"complexity": "low",
|
|
14049
|
+
"complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / PR:N — unauthenticated against a reachable ComfyUI instance.",
|
|
14050
|
+
"patch_available": true,
|
|
14051
|
+
"patch_required_reboot": false,
|
|
14052
|
+
"live_patch_available": false,
|
|
14053
|
+
"live_patch_tools": [],
|
|
14054
|
+
"live_patch_notes": "Remediation is updating the custom node to its patched version (custom nodes are git-versioned; pull the fix commit) and restarting ComfyUI.",
|
|
14055
|
+
"vendor_update_paths": [
|
|
14056
|
+
"Update the affected ComfyUI custom node to its patched version, never expose ComfyUI to untrusted networks, treat custom nodes as code (review before install), and run ComfyUI as a least-privilege user."
|
|
14057
|
+
],
|
|
14058
|
+
"framework_control_gaps": {
|
|
14059
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": "Flaw-remediation cadence does not track third-party ComfyUI custom nodes as managed, RCE-bearing software.",
|
|
14060
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7": "Boundary-protection control does not flag internet-exposed ComfyUI instances as a custom-node RCE surface.",
|
|
14061
|
+
"ISO-27001-2022-A.8.8": "Vulnerability management rarely enumerates ComfyUI custom nodes (which auto-load and run code) as an in-scope execution surface.",
|
|
14062
|
+
"NIS2-Art21-patch-management": "Article 21 measures do not reach third-party AI-tool plugins as a privileged execution control plane.",
|
|
14063
|
+
"DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model custom-node RCE in an AI image-generation tool as an ICT-risk event.",
|
|
14064
|
+
"UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for treating AI-tool custom nodes / plugins as code requiring review.",
|
|
14065
|
+
"AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out third-party AI-tool extensions.",
|
|
14066
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an AI tool's auto-loaded custom nodes / plugins as an untrusted-code supply-chain and execution surface; a single vulnerable node is unauthenticated RCE."
|
|
14067
|
+
},
|
|
14068
|
+
"atlas_refs": [
|
|
14069
|
+
"AML.T0049"
|
|
14070
|
+
],
|
|
14071
|
+
"attack_refs": [
|
|
14072
|
+
"T1190",
|
|
14073
|
+
"T1059"
|
|
14074
|
+
],
|
|
14075
|
+
"rwep_score": 29,
|
|
14076
|
+
"rwep_factors": {
|
|
14077
|
+
"cisa_kev": 0,
|
|
14078
|
+
"poc_available": 20,
|
|
14079
|
+
"ai_factor": 0,
|
|
14080
|
+
"active_exploitation": 0,
|
|
14081
|
+
"blast_radius": 24,
|
|
14082
|
+
"patch_available": -15,
|
|
14083
|
+
"live_patch_available": 0,
|
|
14084
|
+
"reboot_required": 0
|
|
14085
|
+
},
|
|
14086
|
+
"rwep_notes": "Standard (RWEP 29, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, patched at/after disclosure (Hard Rule #3); active_exploitation kept 'none' for this specific CVE despite the broader ComfyUI botnet campaign (unconfirmed vector). poc_available=20 + blast_radius=24 (ComfyUI is a widely deployed AI image-generation tool) minus patch 15.",
|
|
14087
|
+
"epss_score": null,
|
|
14088
|
+
"epss_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
14089
|
+
"epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
|
|
14090
|
+
"epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
14091
|
+
"cwe_refs": [
|
|
14092
|
+
"CWE-94"
|
|
14093
|
+
],
|
|
14094
|
+
"iocs": {
|
|
14095
|
+
"behavioral": [
|
|
14096
|
+
"ComfyUI workflows invoking BuildColorRangeHSVAdvanced / FilterContour / FindContour nodes with code-like string parameters.",
|
|
14097
|
+
"Python interpreter / subprocess activity triggered during ComfyUI workflow execution.",
|
|
14098
|
+
"Crafted workflow JSON submitted to a ComfyUI instance from an untrusted source.",
|
|
14099
|
+
"ComfyUI exposed to untrusted networks with the affected custom node installed — the exposed precondition."
|
|
14100
|
+
],
|
|
14101
|
+
"_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures derived from NVD CVE-2024-21576 (CWE-94) and Snyk Labs' ComfyUI custom-node research (https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/)."
|
|
14102
|
+
},
|
|
14103
|
+
"source_verified": "2026-05-25",
|
|
14104
|
+
"verification_sources": [
|
|
14105
|
+
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
14106
|
+
"https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/"
|
|
14107
|
+
],
|
|
14108
|
+
"vendor_advisories": [
|
|
14109
|
+
{
|
|
14110
|
+
"vendor": "Snyk Labs / GitHub Advisory",
|
|
14111
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
14112
|
+
"url": "https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/",
|
|
14113
|
+
"severity": "critical",
|
|
14114
|
+
"published_date": "2024-12-13"
|
|
14115
|
+
},
|
|
14116
|
+
{
|
|
14117
|
+
"vendor": "NVD",
|
|
14118
|
+
"advisory_id": "CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
14119
|
+
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
14120
|
+
"severity": "critical",
|
|
14121
|
+
"published_date": "2024-12-13"
|
|
14122
|
+
}
|
|
14123
|
+
],
|
|
14124
|
+
"last_updated": "2026-05-25",
|
|
14125
|
+
"discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from NVD (CWE-94; NIST CVSS 10) + Snyk Labs' ComfyUI custom-node research. Member of the ComfyUI custom-node RCE family (auto-loaded node code as an unauthenticated execution surface).",
|
|
14126
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
14127
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
|
|
14128
|
+
"_kev_short_description": "ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes passes a workflow-supplied string to a dynamic-code-evaluation call (CWE-94), so a crafted workflow yields unauthenticated RCE."
|
|
14129
|
+
},
|
|
13820
14130
|
"CVE-2026-41091": {
|
|
13821
14131
|
"name": "Microsoft Defender (Malware Protection Engine) Link-Following LPE to SYSTEM",
|
|
13822
14132
|
"type": "LPE",
|
package/data/cwe-catalog.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@
|
|
|
252
252
|
"evidence_cves": [
|
|
253
253
|
"CVE-2021-26829",
|
|
254
254
|
"CVE-2024-11182",
|
|
255
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
255
256
|
"CVE-2024-27443",
|
|
256
257
|
"CVE-2024-42009",
|
|
257
258
|
"CVE-2025-27915",
|
|
@@ -372,6 +373,8 @@
|
|
|
372
373
|
"CVE-2017-1000353",
|
|
373
374
|
"CVE-2020-25078",
|
|
374
375
|
"CVE-2022-48503",
|
|
376
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
377
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
375
378
|
"CVE-2024-56145",
|
|
376
379
|
"CVE-2025-11837",
|
|
377
380
|
"CVE-2025-1550",
|
|
@@ -2716,6 +2719,7 @@
|
|
|
2716
2719
|
],
|
|
2717
2720
|
"related_weaknesses": [],
|
|
2718
2721
|
"evidence_cves": [
|
|
2722
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
2719
2723
|
"CVE-2025-8088"
|
|
2720
2724
|
],
|
|
2721
2725
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-18",
|
|
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
|
|
|
43
43
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
44
44
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
45
45
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
46
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
47
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
48
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
46
49
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
47
50
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
48
51
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
@@ -1387,7 +1390,10 @@
|
|
|
1387
1390
|
"CVE-2024-12987",
|
|
1388
1391
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
1389
1392
|
"CVE-2024-1708",
|
|
1393
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
1394
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
1390
1395
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
1396
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
1391
1397
|
"CVE-2024-27199",
|
|
1392
1398
|
"CVE-2024-27443",
|
|
1393
1399
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
@@ -1804,6 +1810,9 @@
|
|
|
1804
1810
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
1805
1811
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
1806
1812
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
1813
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
1814
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
1815
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
1807
1816
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
1808
1817
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
1809
1818
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
@@ -2178,6 +2187,8 @@
|
|
|
2178
2187
|
"CVE-2023-51449",
|
|
2179
2188
|
"CVE-2024-0132",
|
|
2180
2189
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
2190
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
2191
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
2181
2192
|
"CVE-2024-40635",
|
|
2182
2193
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
2183
2194
|
"CVE-2024-42479",
|
|
@@ -2256,6 +2267,7 @@
|
|
|
2256
2267
|
"CVE-2024-11392",
|
|
2257
2268
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
2258
2269
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
2270
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
2259
2271
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
2260
2272
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
2261
2273
|
"CVE-2024-50050",
|
|
@@ -2419,7 +2431,10 @@
|
|
|
2419
2431
|
"CVE-2024-12987",
|
|
2420
2432
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
2421
2433
|
"CVE-2024-1708",
|
|
2434
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
2435
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
2422
2436
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
2437
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
2423
2438
|
"CVE-2024-27199",
|
|
2424
2439
|
"CVE-2024-27443",
|
|
2425
2440
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
@@ -4912,7 +4927,10 @@
|
|
|
4912
4927
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
4913
4928
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
4914
4929
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
4930
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
4931
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
4915
4932
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
4933
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
4916
4934
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
4917
4935
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
4918
4936
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
@@ -5447,7 +5465,10 @@
|
|
|
5447
5465
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
5448
5466
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
5449
5467
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
5468
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
5469
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
5450
5470
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
5471
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
5451
5472
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
5452
5473
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
5453
5474
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
@@ -5525,7 +5546,10 @@
|
|
|
5525
5546
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
5526
5547
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
5527
5548
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
5549
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
5550
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576",
|
|
5528
5551
|
"CVE-2024-21762",
|
|
5552
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
5529
5553
|
"CVE-2024-37032",
|
|
5530
5554
|
"CVE-2024-39722",
|
|
5531
5555
|
"CVE-2024-42478",
|
|
@@ -2142,6 +2142,156 @@
|
|
|
2142
2142
|
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
2143
2143
|
"ai_assist_factor": "low"
|
|
2144
2144
|
},
|
|
2145
|
+
"CVE-2024-27132": {
|
|
2146
|
+
"name": "MLflow Recipe Template Injection XSS to Client-Side RCE",
|
|
2147
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
2148
|
+
"attack_vector": {
|
|
2149
|
+
"description": "MLflow renders recipe template variables without sufficient sanitization (CWE-79, rooted in template injection), so an untrusted recipe executes script in the victim's MLflow session and can pivot to privileged tracking-server actions.",
|
|
2150
|
+
"privileges_required": "none beyond getting a victim to run/view an untrusted recipe (NVD UI:R)",
|
|
2151
|
+
"complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
|
|
2152
|
+
"ai_factor": "The abused surface is the recipe-rendering UI of MLflow, a widely used MLOps experiment-tracking platform. The lesson: MLOps platform UIs render user/community-supplied content (recipes, run metadata, model cards) and must output-encode it — the MLOps UI is a privileged control surface, not a passive viewer."
|
|
2153
|
+
},
|
|
2154
|
+
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
2155
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
2156
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2157
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2158
|
+
"gap": "Does not track the MLOps experiment-tracking platform as managed, user-facing software."
|
|
2159
|
+
},
|
|
2160
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-10": {
|
|
2161
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2162
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2163
|
+
"gap": "Output-encoding is not applied to recipe template variables rendered in the MLflow UI."
|
|
2164
|
+
},
|
|
2165
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
|
|
2166
|
+
"covered": false,
|
|
2167
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2168
|
+
"gap": "No framework treats untrusted MLOps content (recipes, run metadata) as requiring sanitization before rendering."
|
|
2169
|
+
}
|
|
2170
|
+
},
|
|
2171
|
+
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
2172
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 66,
|
|
2173
|
+
"basis": "MLOps platforms are deployed for internal teams and assumed trusted; untrusted recipes/run metadata are rendered without output encoding.",
|
|
2174
|
+
"theater_pattern": "ai_demo_framework_trust"
|
|
2175
|
+
},
|
|
2176
|
+
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
2177
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
2178
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none",
|
|
2179
|
+
"new_control_requirements": [
|
|
2180
|
+
{
|
|
2181
|
+
"id": "NEW-CTRL-097",
|
|
2182
|
+
"name": "MLOPS-PLATFORM-UNTRUSTED-CONTENT-ENCODING",
|
|
2183
|
+
"description": "An MLOps platform UI must output-encode and sanitize all user/community-supplied content it renders (recipe template variables, run metadata, model cards, artifact names) and must not expose its UI / tracking server to untrusted users. Upgrade MLflow to 2.10.0 or later. The distinguishing test: load a recipe whose template variables contain script payloads into a staging MLflow and confirm the UI renders them inert, not executed.",
|
|
2184
|
+
"evidence": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27132",
|
|
2185
|
+
"gap_closes": [
|
|
2186
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2",
|
|
2187
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-10",
|
|
2188
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
|
|
2189
|
+
]
|
|
2190
|
+
}
|
|
2191
|
+
],
|
|
2192
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
2193
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
|
|
2194
|
+
},
|
|
2195
|
+
"CVE-2024-21575": {
|
|
2196
|
+
"name": "ComfyUI-Impact-Pack Path Traversal Arbitrary File Write to RCE",
|
|
2197
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
2198
|
+
"attack_vector": {
|
|
2199
|
+
"description": "A ComfyUI custom node (CWE-35 path traversal on /upload/temp -> write into ./custom_nodes) gives an unauthenticated attacker code execution on a reachable ComfyUI instance. ComfyUI auto-loads node code, so a single vulnerable or malicious custom node is an execution boundary.",
|
|
2200
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (NVD AV:N / PR:N) — unauthenticated against a reachable ComfyUI instance",
|
|
2201
|
+
"complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
|
|
2202
|
+
"ai_factor": "The abused surface is the custom-node ecosystem of ComfyUI, a widely deployed AI image-generation tool. The lesson: AI tools with auto-loaded plugin/custom-node systems treat extension code as trusted, so a single vulnerable node is unauthenticated RCE and the node registry is a supply-chain surface. In April 2026 a cryptomining botnet mass-targeted exposed ComfyUI via this surface."
|
|
2203
|
+
},
|
|
2204
|
+
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
2205
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
2206
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2207
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2208
|
+
"gap": "Does not track third-party ComfyUI custom nodes as managed, RCE-bearing software."
|
|
2209
|
+
},
|
|
2210
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7": {
|
|
2211
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2212
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2213
|
+
"gap": "Does not flag internet-exposed ComfyUI instances as a custom-node RCE surface."
|
|
2214
|
+
},
|
|
2215
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
|
|
2216
|
+
"covered": false,
|
|
2217
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2218
|
+
"gap": "No framework treats an AI tool's auto-loaded custom nodes as an untrusted-code supply-chain and execution surface."
|
|
2219
|
+
}
|
|
2220
|
+
},
|
|
2221
|
+
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
2222
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
|
|
2223
|
+
"basis": "AI image-gen tools are deployed with community custom nodes installed and often internet-exposed; the node ecosystem is trusted by default and not in the vulnerability program.",
|
|
2224
|
+
"theater_pattern": "ai_supply_chain_trust"
|
|
2225
|
+
},
|
|
2226
|
+
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
2227
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
2228
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none",
|
|
2229
|
+
"new_control_requirements": [
|
|
2230
|
+
{
|
|
2231
|
+
"id": "NEW-CTRL-098",
|
|
2232
|
+
"name": "AI-TOOL-CUSTOM-NODE-EXTENSION-TRUST",
|
|
2233
|
+
"description": "An AI tool that auto-loads custom nodes / plugins must treat them as code: review/allow-list before install, validate any file paths or workflow strings the nodes consume, never expose the tool (or its node-install endpoint) to untrusted networks, and run least-privilege. Update affected ComfyUI custom nodes to their patched versions. The distinguishing test: from an unauthenticated client, attempt the path-traversal upload and the crafted-workflow code-injection against a staging ComfyUI and confirm neither writes outside the temp dir nor executes node-supplied strings.",
|
|
2234
|
+
"evidence": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6mx8-m8xp-f2vc",
|
|
2235
|
+
"gap_closes": [
|
|
2236
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2",
|
|
2237
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7",
|
|
2238
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
|
|
2239
|
+
]
|
|
2240
|
+
}
|
|
2241
|
+
],
|
|
2242
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
2243
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
|
|
2244
|
+
},
|
|
2245
|
+
"CVE-2024-21576": {
|
|
2246
|
+
"name": "ComfyUI-Bmad-Nodes Workflow Code Injection RCE",
|
|
2247
|
+
"lesson_date": "2026-05-25",
|
|
2248
|
+
"attack_vector": {
|
|
2249
|
+
"description": "A ComfyUI custom node (CWE-94 code injection via dynamic evaluation of a workflow string) gives an unauthenticated attacker code execution on a reachable ComfyUI instance. ComfyUI auto-loads node code, so a single vulnerable or malicious custom node is an execution boundary.",
|
|
2250
|
+
"privileges_required": "none (NVD AV:N / PR:N) — unauthenticated against a reachable ComfyUI instance",
|
|
2251
|
+
"complexity": "low (NVD AC:L)",
|
|
2252
|
+
"ai_factor": "The abused surface is the custom-node ecosystem of ComfyUI, a widely deployed AI image-generation tool. The lesson: AI tools with auto-loaded plugin/custom-node systems treat extension code as trusted, so a single vulnerable node is unauthenticated RCE and the node registry is a supply-chain surface. In April 2026 a cryptomining botnet mass-targeted exposed ComfyUI via this surface."
|
|
2253
|
+
},
|
|
2254
|
+
"framework_coverage": {
|
|
2255
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2": {
|
|
2256
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2257
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2258
|
+
"gap": "Does not track third-party ComfyUI custom nodes as managed, RCE-bearing software."
|
|
2259
|
+
},
|
|
2260
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7": {
|
|
2261
|
+
"covered": true,
|
|
2262
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2263
|
+
"gap": "Does not flag internet-exposed ComfyUI instances as a custom-node RCE surface."
|
|
2264
|
+
},
|
|
2265
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": {
|
|
2266
|
+
"covered": false,
|
|
2267
|
+
"adequate": false,
|
|
2268
|
+
"gap": "No framework treats an AI tool's auto-loaded custom nodes as an untrusted-code supply-chain and execution surface."
|
|
2269
|
+
}
|
|
2270
|
+
},
|
|
2271
|
+
"compliance_exposure_score": {
|
|
2272
|
+
"percent_audit_passing_orgs_still_exposed": 70,
|
|
2273
|
+
"basis": "AI image-gen tools are deployed with community custom nodes installed and often internet-exposed; the node ecosystem is trusted by default and not in the vulnerability program.",
|
|
2274
|
+
"theater_pattern": "ai_supply_chain_trust"
|
|
2275
|
+
},
|
|
2276
|
+
"ai_discovered_zeroday": false,
|
|
2277
|
+
"ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
|
|
2278
|
+
"ai_assist_factor": "none",
|
|
2279
|
+
"new_control_requirements": [
|
|
2280
|
+
{
|
|
2281
|
+
"id": "NEW-CTRL-098",
|
|
2282
|
+
"name": "AI-TOOL-CUSTOM-NODE-EXTENSION-TRUST",
|
|
2283
|
+
"description": "An AI tool that auto-loads custom nodes / plugins must treat them as code: review/allow-list before install, validate any file paths or workflow strings the nodes consume, never expose the tool (or its node-install endpoint) to untrusted networks, and run least-privilege. Update affected ComfyUI custom nodes to their patched versions. The distinguishing test: from an unauthenticated client, attempt the path-traversal upload and the crafted-workflow code-injection against a staging ComfyUI and confirm neither writes outside the temp dir nor executes node-supplied strings.",
|
|
2284
|
+
"evidence": "https://labs.snyk.io/resources/hacking-comfyui-through-custom-nodes/",
|
|
2285
|
+
"gap_closes": [
|
|
2286
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SI-2",
|
|
2287
|
+
"NIST-800-53-SC-7",
|
|
2288
|
+
"ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY"
|
|
2289
|
+
]
|
|
2290
|
+
}
|
|
2291
|
+
],
|
|
2292
|
+
"_auto_imported": false,
|
|
2293
|
+
"_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation"
|
|
2294
|
+
},
|
|
2145
2295
|
"CVE-2020-10148": {
|
|
2146
2296
|
"name": "SolarWinds Orion API authentication bypass (SUNBURST chain component)",
|
|
2147
2297
|
"lesson_date": "2026-05-19",
|