@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.13.113 → 0.13.114
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +4 -0
- package/data/_indexes/_meta.json +9 -9
- package/data/_indexes/activity-feed.json +2 -2
- package/data/_indexes/catalog-summaries.json +2 -2
- package/data/_indexes/chains.json +300 -0
- package/data/atlas-ttps.json +2 -0
- package/data/attack-techniques.json +12 -3
- package/data/cve-catalog.json +208 -0
- package/data/cwe-catalog.json +8 -2
- package/data/framework-control-gaps.json +16 -0
- package/data/zeroday-lessons.json +100 -0
- package/manifest.json +44 -44
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/sbom.cdx.json +25 -25
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Changelog
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
+
## 0.13.114 — 2026-05-26
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
CVE catalog — Dify password-recovery account takeover. Adds two flaws in Dify's password-reset flow, both yielding takeover of any account including administrators (CWE-640 weak password-recovery mechanism). **CVE-2025-1796** (CWE-338 / CWE-640, NVD CVSS 8.8 HIGH; huntr CNA 7.5) — reset codes are generated with a weak pseudo-random number generator (`random.randint`), so an attacker predicts the code and resets any account. **CVE-2024-12776** (CWE-287 / CWE-640, huntr CNA CVSS 8.1 HIGH; NVD classifies it CWE-305) — the `/forgot-password/resets` endpoint does not verify the reset code before allowing a reset. Neither has a fixed version published, so mitigation is generating reset tokens with a CSPRNG and verifying them server-side. Both introduce NEW-CTRL-108: an AI app's password-recovery flow must use cryptographically secure, single-use, short-lived reset tokens and verify them server-side before any reset. CVE count 402 → 404.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
3
7
|
## 0.13.113 — 2026-05-26
|
|
4
8
|
|
|
5
9
|
CVE catalog — Dify LLM app-platform. Adds two flaws in Dify, the low-code LLM application-development platform. **CVE-2025-3466** (CWE-94 / CWE-693, NVD CVSS 7.2 HIGH; huntr CNA 9.8 CRITICAL) — the code node runs user-supplied code in a sandbox, but unsanitized input lets an attacker override global functions (e.g. `parseInt`) before the sandbox restrictions are applied, escaping the sandbox and executing code with root-level access; fixed in 1.1.3. (NVD classifies it CWE-1100; the catalog maps that to the catalogued CWE-94 + CWE-693.) **CVE-2025-56520** (CWE-918, CISA-ADP CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM) — the `RemoteFileUploadApi` fetches a user-supplied URL without validating the destination, so an unauthenticated attacker reaches internal services or cloud metadata via the server; no fixed version is published, so mitigation is destination allowlisting and network isolation. The code-node RCE reuses the LLM-app-builder execution control (NEW-CTRL-103) — an app builder must initialize its sandbox before evaluating user input — and the SSRF reuses the data-pipeline SSRF control (NEW-CTRL-105). CVE count 400 → 402.
|
package/data/_indexes/_meta.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"schema_version": "1.1.0",
|
|
3
|
-
"generated_at": "2026-05-
|
|
3
|
+
"generated_at": "2026-05-26T16:55:23.938Z",
|
|
4
4
|
"generator": "scripts/build-indexes.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"source_count": 54,
|
|
6
6
|
"source_hashes": {
|
|
7
|
-
"manifest.json": "
|
|
8
|
-
"data/atlas-ttps.json": "
|
|
9
|
-
"data/attack-techniques.json": "
|
|
10
|
-
"data/cve-catalog.json": "
|
|
11
|
-
"data/cwe-catalog.json": "
|
|
7
|
+
"manifest.json": "d241dfd94764cfbd42fc25fc55dbb57e8bf98cae9494b09a3fc6b6d5c206bfd5",
|
|
8
|
+
"data/atlas-ttps.json": "fbad886119efbb01d6ae80647cb84ef8d6335b819eebb7ec650ad9819c3f6afd",
|
|
9
|
+
"data/attack-techniques.json": "b9d62387c336b73a7807d2a8bf3c8a13fa080a18b1b39fe7377db7adb1ba7546",
|
|
10
|
+
"data/cve-catalog.json": "7ebe9b305a77bfc5634a5511cf550cc4d3b91f36dcc0187042200442142d6dbb",
|
|
11
|
+
"data/cwe-catalog.json": "9a402095ba8994f0e97f11ddd94eb5b6b7ee2f370e4d82fb1d1a115271b16283",
|
|
12
12
|
"data/d3fend-catalog.json": "9a54bccb9f24f84b32024216cc3f53819a053721ac8ab43c326859e68fc0ffaf",
|
|
13
13
|
"data/dlp-controls.json": "d2406c482dddd30e49203879999dc4b3a7fd4d0494d6a61d86b91ee76415df19",
|
|
14
14
|
"data/exploit-availability.json": "ec2656f0d9a893610e27b43eb6035fe9b18e057c9f6dfaac7e7d4959bbcbb795",
|
|
15
|
-
"data/framework-control-gaps.json": "
|
|
15
|
+
"data/framework-control-gaps.json": "afc00b1a651c4b880d9eb68ee73a0ae141551678cc6c2e20bd423294f961e630",
|
|
16
16
|
"data/global-frameworks.json": "9ba563a85f7f8d6c3c957de64945e20925a89d0ed6ea6fc561cf093811acf558",
|
|
17
17
|
"data/rfc-references.json": "66ef2e1f444a2cf0c2700a754f0a66030bb8a91d9e68394b9537ea1fe8b904fe",
|
|
18
|
-
"data/zeroday-lessons.json": "
|
|
18
|
+
"data/zeroday-lessons.json": "966516c060db19606255630d59868e9a8a64c0fc09dd94d0c4ddd8a7d0e2ba48",
|
|
19
19
|
"skills/kernel-lpe-triage/skill.md": "08b3e9815ba481c57c80f5fc0ccbf5bb7cbb41f570c235ba6ff9596b8c07354d",
|
|
20
20
|
"skills/ai-attack-surface/skill.md": "c4c1eb22a38ca7a959b5725222bab8fbd4f4044a548a93f3e288e6f698334b72",
|
|
21
21
|
"skills/mcp-agent-trust/skill.md": "89ac89084391d2341b6513fefb1be2d36b93de1c130f057696219c1c59440f13",
|
|
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
|
|
|
72
72
|
"dlp_refs": 0
|
|
73
73
|
},
|
|
74
74
|
"trigger_table_entries": 538,
|
|
75
|
-
"chains_cve_entries":
|
|
75
|
+
"chains_cve_entries": 393,
|
|
76
76
|
"chains_cwe_entries": 171,
|
|
77
77
|
"jurisdictions_indexed": 29,
|
|
78
78
|
"handoff_dag_nodes": 42,
|
|
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
|
|
|
149
149
|
"artifact": "data/cve-catalog.json",
|
|
150
150
|
"path": "data/cve-catalog.json",
|
|
151
151
|
"schema_version": "1.0.0",
|
|
152
|
-
"entry_count":
|
|
152
|
+
"entry_count": 404
|
|
153
153
|
},
|
|
154
154
|
{
|
|
155
155
|
"date": "2026-05-18",
|
|
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
|
|
|
165
165
|
"artifact": "data/zeroday-lessons.json",
|
|
166
166
|
"path": "data/zeroday-lessons.json",
|
|
167
167
|
"schema_version": "1.1.0",
|
|
168
|
-
"entry_count":
|
|
168
|
+
"entry_count": 399
|
|
169
169
|
},
|
|
170
170
|
{
|
|
171
171
|
"date": "2026-05-17",
|
|
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
|
|
|
62
62
|
"rebuild_after_days": 365,
|
|
63
63
|
"note": "Per-entry last_verified governs decay. Skills depending on this catalog must check entry freshness before high-stakes use."
|
|
64
64
|
},
|
|
65
|
-
"entry_count":
|
|
65
|
+
"entry_count": 404,
|
|
66
66
|
"sample_keys": [
|
|
67
67
|
"CVE-2025-53773",
|
|
68
68
|
"CVE-2026-30615",
|
|
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
|
|
|
238
238
|
"rebuild_after_days": 365,
|
|
239
239
|
"note": "Per-entry last_verified governs decay. Skills depending on this catalog must check entry freshness before high-stakes use."
|
|
240
240
|
},
|
|
241
|
-
"entry_count":
|
|
241
|
+
"entry_count": 399,
|
|
242
242
|
"sample_keys": [
|
|
243
243
|
"CVE-2026-31431",
|
|
244
244
|
"CVE-2025-53773",
|
|
@@ -46402,6 +46402,300 @@
|
|
|
46402
46402
|
]
|
|
46403
46403
|
}
|
|
46404
46404
|
},
|
|
46405
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796": {
|
|
46406
|
+
"name": "Dify Weak-PRNG Password Reset Account Takeover",
|
|
46407
|
+
"rwep": 44,
|
|
46408
|
+
"cvss": 8.8,
|
|
46409
|
+
"cisa_kev": false,
|
|
46410
|
+
"epss_score": null,
|
|
46411
|
+
"referencing_skills": [
|
|
46412
|
+
"ai-attack-surface",
|
|
46413
|
+
"compliance-theater"
|
|
46414
|
+
],
|
|
46415
|
+
"chain": {
|
|
46416
|
+
"cwes": [
|
|
46417
|
+
{
|
|
46418
|
+
"id": "CWE-1039",
|
|
46419
|
+
"name": "Automated Recognition Mechanism with Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations",
|
|
46420
|
+
"category": "AI/ML"
|
|
46421
|
+
},
|
|
46422
|
+
{
|
|
46423
|
+
"id": "CWE-1426",
|
|
46424
|
+
"name": "Improper Validation of Generative AI Output",
|
|
46425
|
+
"category": "AI/ML"
|
|
46426
|
+
},
|
|
46427
|
+
{
|
|
46428
|
+
"id": "CWE-94",
|
|
46429
|
+
"name": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)",
|
|
46430
|
+
"category": "Injection"
|
|
46431
|
+
}
|
|
46432
|
+
],
|
|
46433
|
+
"atlas": [
|
|
46434
|
+
{
|
|
46435
|
+
"id": "AML.T0016",
|
|
46436
|
+
"name": "Obtain Capabilities: Develop Capabilities",
|
|
46437
|
+
"tactic": "Resource Development"
|
|
46438
|
+
},
|
|
46439
|
+
{
|
|
46440
|
+
"id": "AML.T0017",
|
|
46441
|
+
"name": "Discover ML Model Ontology",
|
|
46442
|
+
"tactic": "Discovery"
|
|
46443
|
+
},
|
|
46444
|
+
{
|
|
46445
|
+
"id": "AML.T0018",
|
|
46446
|
+
"name": "Backdoor ML Model",
|
|
46447
|
+
"tactic": "Persistence"
|
|
46448
|
+
},
|
|
46449
|
+
{
|
|
46450
|
+
"id": "AML.T0020",
|
|
46451
|
+
"name": "Poison Training Data",
|
|
46452
|
+
"tactic": "ML Attack Staging"
|
|
46453
|
+
},
|
|
46454
|
+
{
|
|
46455
|
+
"id": "AML.T0043",
|
|
46456
|
+
"name": "Craft Adversarial Data",
|
|
46457
|
+
"tactic": "ML Attack Staging"
|
|
46458
|
+
},
|
|
46459
|
+
{
|
|
46460
|
+
"id": "AML.T0051",
|
|
46461
|
+
"name": "LLM Prompt Injection",
|
|
46462
|
+
"tactic": "Execution"
|
|
46463
|
+
},
|
|
46464
|
+
{
|
|
46465
|
+
"id": "AML.T0054",
|
|
46466
|
+
"name": "LLM Jailbreak",
|
|
46467
|
+
"tactic": "Defense Evasion"
|
|
46468
|
+
},
|
|
46469
|
+
{
|
|
46470
|
+
"id": "AML.T0096",
|
|
46471
|
+
"name": "AI API as Covert C2 Channel",
|
|
46472
|
+
"tactic": "Command and Control"
|
|
46473
|
+
}
|
|
46474
|
+
],
|
|
46475
|
+
"d3fend": [
|
|
46476
|
+
{
|
|
46477
|
+
"id": "D3-IOPR",
|
|
46478
|
+
"name": "Input/Output Profiling Resource",
|
|
46479
|
+
"tactic": "Detect"
|
|
46480
|
+
},
|
|
46481
|
+
{
|
|
46482
|
+
"id": "D3-NTA",
|
|
46483
|
+
"name": "Network Traffic Analysis",
|
|
46484
|
+
"tactic": "Detect"
|
|
46485
|
+
}
|
|
46486
|
+
],
|
|
46487
|
+
"framework_gaps": [
|
|
46488
|
+
{
|
|
46489
|
+
"id": "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY",
|
|
46490
|
+
"framework": "ALL",
|
|
46491
|
+
"control_name": "AI Pipeline Integrity"
|
|
46492
|
+
},
|
|
46493
|
+
{
|
|
46494
|
+
"id": "ALL-PROMPT-INJECTION-ACCESS-CONTROL",
|
|
46495
|
+
"framework": "ALL",
|
|
46496
|
+
"control_name": "Prompt Injection as Access Control Failure"
|
|
46497
|
+
},
|
|
46498
|
+
{
|
|
46499
|
+
"id": "CMMC-2.0-Level-2",
|
|
46500
|
+
"framework": "CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) Level 2",
|
|
46501
|
+
"control_name": "Level 2 — Advanced (110 NIST 800-171 Rev 2 controls)"
|
|
46502
|
+
},
|
|
46503
|
+
{
|
|
46504
|
+
"id": "FedRAMP-Rev5-Moderate",
|
|
46505
|
+
"framework": "FedRAMP Rev 5 Moderate",
|
|
46506
|
+
"control_name": "FedRAMP Moderate baseline (NIST 800-53 Rev 5 tailoring)"
|
|
46507
|
+
},
|
|
46508
|
+
{
|
|
46509
|
+
"id": "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.28",
|
|
46510
|
+
"framework": "ISO/IEC 27001:2022",
|
|
46511
|
+
"control_name": "Secure coding"
|
|
46512
|
+
},
|
|
46513
|
+
{
|
|
46514
|
+
"id": "ISO-IEC-23894-2023-clause-7",
|
|
46515
|
+
"framework": "ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (AI Risk Management Guidance)",
|
|
46516
|
+
"control_name": "AI risk management process"
|
|
46517
|
+
},
|
|
46518
|
+
{
|
|
46519
|
+
"id": "NIST-800-53-AC-2",
|
|
46520
|
+
"framework": "NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5",
|
|
46521
|
+
"control_name": "Account Management"
|
|
46522
|
+
},
|
|
46523
|
+
{
|
|
46524
|
+
"id": "NIST-800-53-SI-3",
|
|
46525
|
+
"framework": "NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5",
|
|
46526
|
+
"control_name": "Malicious Code Protection"
|
|
46527
|
+
},
|
|
46528
|
+
{
|
|
46529
|
+
"id": "OWASP-LLM-Top-10-2025-LLM01",
|
|
46530
|
+
"framework": "OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025",
|
|
46531
|
+
"control_name": "Prompt Injection"
|
|
46532
|
+
},
|
|
46533
|
+
{
|
|
46534
|
+
"id": "OWASP-LLM-Top-10-2025-LLM02",
|
|
46535
|
+
"framework": "OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025",
|
|
46536
|
+
"control_name": "Sensitive Information Disclosure"
|
|
46537
|
+
},
|
|
46538
|
+
{
|
|
46539
|
+
"id": "SOC2-CC6-logical-access",
|
|
46540
|
+
"framework": "SOC 2 (AICPA Trust Services Criteria)",
|
|
46541
|
+
"control_name": "Logical and Physical Access Controls"
|
|
46542
|
+
}
|
|
46543
|
+
],
|
|
46544
|
+
"attack_refs": [
|
|
46545
|
+
"T1059",
|
|
46546
|
+
"T1190",
|
|
46547
|
+
"T1566"
|
|
46548
|
+
],
|
|
46549
|
+
"rfc_refs": []
|
|
46550
|
+
}
|
|
46551
|
+
},
|
|
46552
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776": {
|
|
46553
|
+
"name": "Dify Unverified Password-Reset Endpoint Account Takeover",
|
|
46554
|
+
"rwep": 44,
|
|
46555
|
+
"cvss": 8.1,
|
|
46556
|
+
"cisa_kev": false,
|
|
46557
|
+
"epss_score": null,
|
|
46558
|
+
"referencing_skills": [
|
|
46559
|
+
"ai-attack-surface",
|
|
46560
|
+
"compliance-theater"
|
|
46561
|
+
],
|
|
46562
|
+
"chain": {
|
|
46563
|
+
"cwes": [
|
|
46564
|
+
{
|
|
46565
|
+
"id": "CWE-1039",
|
|
46566
|
+
"name": "Automated Recognition Mechanism with Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations",
|
|
46567
|
+
"category": "AI/ML"
|
|
46568
|
+
},
|
|
46569
|
+
{
|
|
46570
|
+
"id": "CWE-1426",
|
|
46571
|
+
"name": "Improper Validation of Generative AI Output",
|
|
46572
|
+
"category": "AI/ML"
|
|
46573
|
+
},
|
|
46574
|
+
{
|
|
46575
|
+
"id": "CWE-94",
|
|
46576
|
+
"name": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)",
|
|
46577
|
+
"category": "Injection"
|
|
46578
|
+
}
|
|
46579
|
+
],
|
|
46580
|
+
"atlas": [
|
|
46581
|
+
{
|
|
46582
|
+
"id": "AML.T0016",
|
|
46583
|
+
"name": "Obtain Capabilities: Develop Capabilities",
|
|
46584
|
+
"tactic": "Resource Development"
|
|
46585
|
+
},
|
|
46586
|
+
{
|
|
46587
|
+
"id": "AML.T0017",
|
|
46588
|
+
"name": "Discover ML Model Ontology",
|
|
46589
|
+
"tactic": "Discovery"
|
|
46590
|
+
},
|
|
46591
|
+
{
|
|
46592
|
+
"id": "AML.T0018",
|
|
46593
|
+
"name": "Backdoor ML Model",
|
|
46594
|
+
"tactic": "Persistence"
|
|
46595
|
+
},
|
|
46596
|
+
{
|
|
46597
|
+
"id": "AML.T0020",
|
|
46598
|
+
"name": "Poison Training Data",
|
|
46599
|
+
"tactic": "ML Attack Staging"
|
|
46600
|
+
},
|
|
46601
|
+
{
|
|
46602
|
+
"id": "AML.T0043",
|
|
46603
|
+
"name": "Craft Adversarial Data",
|
|
46604
|
+
"tactic": "ML Attack Staging"
|
|
46605
|
+
},
|
|
46606
|
+
{
|
|
46607
|
+
"id": "AML.T0051",
|
|
46608
|
+
"name": "LLM Prompt Injection",
|
|
46609
|
+
"tactic": "Execution"
|
|
46610
|
+
},
|
|
46611
|
+
{
|
|
46612
|
+
"id": "AML.T0054",
|
|
46613
|
+
"name": "LLM Jailbreak",
|
|
46614
|
+
"tactic": "Defense Evasion"
|
|
46615
|
+
},
|
|
46616
|
+
{
|
|
46617
|
+
"id": "AML.T0096",
|
|
46618
|
+
"name": "AI API as Covert C2 Channel",
|
|
46619
|
+
"tactic": "Command and Control"
|
|
46620
|
+
}
|
|
46621
|
+
],
|
|
46622
|
+
"d3fend": [
|
|
46623
|
+
{
|
|
46624
|
+
"id": "D3-IOPR",
|
|
46625
|
+
"name": "Input/Output Profiling Resource",
|
|
46626
|
+
"tactic": "Detect"
|
|
46627
|
+
},
|
|
46628
|
+
{
|
|
46629
|
+
"id": "D3-NTA",
|
|
46630
|
+
"name": "Network Traffic Analysis",
|
|
46631
|
+
"tactic": "Detect"
|
|
46632
|
+
}
|
|
46633
|
+
],
|
|
46634
|
+
"framework_gaps": [
|
|
46635
|
+
{
|
|
46636
|
+
"id": "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY",
|
|
46637
|
+
"framework": "ALL",
|
|
46638
|
+
"control_name": "AI Pipeline Integrity"
|
|
46639
|
+
},
|
|
46640
|
+
{
|
|
46641
|
+
"id": "ALL-PROMPT-INJECTION-ACCESS-CONTROL",
|
|
46642
|
+
"framework": "ALL",
|
|
46643
|
+
"control_name": "Prompt Injection as Access Control Failure"
|
|
46644
|
+
},
|
|
46645
|
+
{
|
|
46646
|
+
"id": "CMMC-2.0-Level-2",
|
|
46647
|
+
"framework": "CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) Level 2",
|
|
46648
|
+
"control_name": "Level 2 — Advanced (110 NIST 800-171 Rev 2 controls)"
|
|
46649
|
+
},
|
|
46650
|
+
{
|
|
46651
|
+
"id": "FedRAMP-Rev5-Moderate",
|
|
46652
|
+
"framework": "FedRAMP Rev 5 Moderate",
|
|
46653
|
+
"control_name": "FedRAMP Moderate baseline (NIST 800-53 Rev 5 tailoring)"
|
|
46654
|
+
},
|
|
46655
|
+
{
|
|
46656
|
+
"id": "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.28",
|
|
46657
|
+
"framework": "ISO/IEC 27001:2022",
|
|
46658
|
+
"control_name": "Secure coding"
|
|
46659
|
+
},
|
|
46660
|
+
{
|
|
46661
|
+
"id": "ISO-IEC-23894-2023-clause-7",
|
|
46662
|
+
"framework": "ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (AI Risk Management Guidance)",
|
|
46663
|
+
"control_name": "AI risk management process"
|
|
46664
|
+
},
|
|
46665
|
+
{
|
|
46666
|
+
"id": "NIST-800-53-AC-2",
|
|
46667
|
+
"framework": "NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5",
|
|
46668
|
+
"control_name": "Account Management"
|
|
46669
|
+
},
|
|
46670
|
+
{
|
|
46671
|
+
"id": "NIST-800-53-SI-3",
|
|
46672
|
+
"framework": "NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5",
|
|
46673
|
+
"control_name": "Malicious Code Protection"
|
|
46674
|
+
},
|
|
46675
|
+
{
|
|
46676
|
+
"id": "OWASP-LLM-Top-10-2025-LLM01",
|
|
46677
|
+
"framework": "OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025",
|
|
46678
|
+
"control_name": "Prompt Injection"
|
|
46679
|
+
},
|
|
46680
|
+
{
|
|
46681
|
+
"id": "OWASP-LLM-Top-10-2025-LLM02",
|
|
46682
|
+
"framework": "OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025",
|
|
46683
|
+
"control_name": "Sensitive Information Disclosure"
|
|
46684
|
+
},
|
|
46685
|
+
{
|
|
46686
|
+
"id": "SOC2-CC6-logical-access",
|
|
46687
|
+
"framework": "SOC 2 (AICPA Trust Services Criteria)",
|
|
46688
|
+
"control_name": "Logical and Physical Access Controls"
|
|
46689
|
+
}
|
|
46690
|
+
],
|
|
46691
|
+
"attack_refs": [
|
|
46692
|
+
"T1059",
|
|
46693
|
+
"T1190",
|
|
46694
|
+
"T1566"
|
|
46695
|
+
],
|
|
46696
|
+
"rfc_refs": []
|
|
46697
|
+
}
|
|
46698
|
+
},
|
|
46405
46699
|
"CVE-2026-41091": {
|
|
46406
46700
|
"name": "Microsoft Defender (Malware Protection Engine) Link-Following LPE to SYSTEM",
|
|
46407
46701
|
"rwep": 45,
|
|
@@ -74014,6 +74308,7 @@
|
|
|
74014
74308
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
74015
74309
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
74016
74310
|
"CVE-2024-12366",
|
|
74311
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
74017
74312
|
"CVE-2024-13059",
|
|
74018
74313
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
74019
74314
|
"CVE-2024-21513",
|
|
@@ -74041,6 +74336,7 @@
|
|
|
74041
74336
|
"CVE-2025-11837",
|
|
74042
74337
|
"CVE-2025-1550",
|
|
74043
74338
|
"CVE-2025-1753",
|
|
74339
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
74044
74340
|
"CVE-2025-23254",
|
|
74045
74341
|
"CVE-2025-23266",
|
|
74046
74342
|
"CVE-2025-25297",
|
|
@@ -81880,6 +82176,7 @@
|
|
|
81880
82176
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
81881
82177
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
81882
82178
|
"CVE-2024-12366",
|
|
82179
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
81883
82180
|
"CVE-2024-13059",
|
|
81884
82181
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
81885
82182
|
"CVE-2024-21513",
|
|
@@ -81905,6 +82202,7 @@
|
|
|
81905
82202
|
"CVE-2025-11837",
|
|
81906
82203
|
"CVE-2025-1550",
|
|
81907
82204
|
"CVE-2025-1753",
|
|
82205
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
81908
82206
|
"CVE-2025-23254",
|
|
81909
82207
|
"CVE-2025-23266",
|
|
81910
82208
|
"CVE-2025-25297",
|
|
@@ -83199,6 +83497,7 @@
|
|
|
83199
83497
|
"CVE-2024-11393",
|
|
83200
83498
|
"CVE-2024-11394",
|
|
83201
83499
|
"CVE-2024-12366",
|
|
83500
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
83202
83501
|
"CVE-2024-13059",
|
|
83203
83502
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
83204
83503
|
"CVE-2024-21513",
|
|
@@ -83227,6 +83526,7 @@
|
|
|
83227
83526
|
"CVE-2025-14847",
|
|
83228
83527
|
"CVE-2025-1550",
|
|
83229
83528
|
"CVE-2025-1753",
|
|
83529
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
83230
83530
|
"CVE-2025-22226",
|
|
83231
83531
|
"CVE-2025-23254",
|
|
83232
83532
|
"CVE-2025-23266",
|
package/data/atlas-ttps.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1748,6 +1748,7 @@
|
|
|
1748
1748
|
"CVE-2023-6021",
|
|
1749
1749
|
"CVE-2023-6038",
|
|
1750
1750
|
"CVE-2023-6571",
|
|
1751
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
1751
1752
|
"CVE-2024-13059",
|
|
1752
1753
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
1753
1754
|
"CVE-2024-21575",
|
|
@@ -1762,6 +1763,7 @@
|
|
|
1762
1763
|
"CVE-2024-4889",
|
|
1763
1764
|
"CVE-2024-6587",
|
|
1764
1765
|
"CVE-2024-9526",
|
|
1766
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
1765
1767
|
"CVE-2025-25297",
|
|
1766
1768
|
"CVE-2025-27520",
|
|
1767
1769
|
"CVE-2025-30202",
|
|
@@ -530,8 +530,10 @@
|
|
|
530
530
|
"CVE-2023-27351",
|
|
531
531
|
"CVE-2023-43791",
|
|
532
532
|
"CVE-2023-50224",
|
|
533
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
533
534
|
"CVE-2024-1709",
|
|
534
535
|
"CVE-2024-54085",
|
|
536
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
535
537
|
"CVE-2025-21085",
|
|
536
538
|
"CVE-2025-2746",
|
|
537
539
|
"CVE-2025-2747",
|
|
@@ -776,7 +778,8 @@
|
|
|
776
778
|
"description": "Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained.(Citation: TrendMicro Pawn Storm Dec 2020) Without knowledge of the password for an account or set of accounts, an adversary may systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism.(Citation: Dragos Crashoverride 2018) Brute forcing passwords can take place via interaction with a service that will check the validity of those credentials ...",
|
|
777
779
|
"tactic": [
|
|
778
780
|
"Credential Access"
|
|
779
|
-
]
|
|
781
|
+
],
|
|
782
|
+
"cve_refs": []
|
|
780
783
|
},
|
|
781
784
|
"T1110.001": {
|
|
782
785
|
"name": "Brute Force: Password Guessing",
|
|
@@ -895,6 +898,7 @@
|
|
|
895
898
|
"CVE-2023-6019",
|
|
896
899
|
"CVE-2023-6021",
|
|
897
900
|
"CVE-2023-6038",
|
|
901
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776",
|
|
898
902
|
"CVE-2024-12987",
|
|
899
903
|
"CVE-2024-13059",
|
|
900
904
|
"CVE-2024-1561",
|
|
@@ -927,6 +931,7 @@
|
|
|
927
931
|
"CVE-2025-14733",
|
|
928
932
|
"CVE-2025-14847",
|
|
929
933
|
"CVE-2025-15556",
|
|
934
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796",
|
|
930
935
|
"CVE-2025-20281",
|
|
931
936
|
"CVE-2025-20333",
|
|
932
937
|
"CVE-2025-20337",
|
|
@@ -1269,7 +1274,8 @@
|
|
|
1269
1274
|
"version": "v19",
|
|
1270
1275
|
"cve_refs": [
|
|
1271
1276
|
"CVE-2023-43791",
|
|
1272
|
-
"CVE-2025-14174"
|
|
1277
|
+
"CVE-2025-14174",
|
|
1278
|
+
"CVE-2025-1796"
|
|
1273
1279
|
],
|
|
1274
1280
|
"description_full": "Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Credentialing and authentication mechanisms may be targeted for exploitation by adversaries as a means to gain access to useful credentials or circumvent the process to gain authenticated access to systems. One example of this is `MS14-068`, which targets Kerberos and can be used to forge Kerberos tickets using domain user permissions.(Citation: Technet MS14-068)(Citation: ADSecurity Detecting Forged Tickets) Another example of this is replay attacks, in which the adversary intercepts data packets sent between parties and then later replays these packets. If services don't properly validate authentication requests, these replayed packets may allow an adversary to impersonate one of the parties and gain unauthorized access or privileges.(Citation: Bugcrowd Replay Attack)(Citation: Comparitech Replay Attack)(Citation: Microsoft Midnight Blizzard Replay Attack) Such exploitation has been demonstrated in cloud environments as well. For example, adversaries have exploited vulnerabilities in public cloud infrastructure that allowed for unintended authentication token creation and renewal.(Citation: Storm-0558 techniques for unauthorized email access) Exploitation for credential access may also result in Privilege Escalation depending on the process targeted or credentials obtained.",
|
|
1275
1281
|
"platforms": [
|
|
@@ -1726,7 +1732,10 @@
|
|
|
1726
1732
|
"stix_id": "attack-pattern--f4c1826f-a322-41cd-9557-562100848c84",
|
|
1727
1733
|
"is_subtechnique": false,
|
|
1728
1734
|
"last_verified": "2026-05-19",
|
|
1729
|
-
"description": "Adversaries may modify authentication mechanisms and processes to access user credentials or enable otherwise unwarranted access to accounts."
|
|
1735
|
+
"description": "Adversaries may modify authentication mechanisms and processes to access user credentials or enable otherwise unwarranted access to accounts.",
|
|
1736
|
+
"cve_refs": [
|
|
1737
|
+
"CVE-2024-12776"
|
|
1738
|
+
]
|
|
1730
1739
|
},
|
|
1731
1740
|
"T1557": {
|
|
1732
1741
|
"name": "Adversary-in-the-Middle",
|