@blamejs/exceptd-skills 0.13.110 → 0.13.113

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1747,6 +1747,7 @@
1747
1747
  "CVE-2023-6019",
1748
1748
  "CVE-2023-6021",
1749
1749
  "CVE-2023-6038",
1750
+ "CVE-2023-6571",
1750
1751
  "CVE-2024-13059",
1751
1752
  "CVE-2024-1561",
1752
1753
  "CVE-2024-21575",
@@ -1760,11 +1761,14 @@
1760
1761
  "CVE-2024-42479",
1761
1762
  "CVE-2024-4889",
1762
1763
  "CVE-2024-6587",
1764
+ "CVE-2024-9526",
1763
1765
  "CVE-2025-25297",
1764
1766
  "CVE-2025-27520",
1765
1767
  "CVE-2025-30202",
1766
1768
  "CVE-2025-32444",
1767
1769
  "CVE-2025-3248",
1770
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
1771
+ "CVE-2025-56520",
1768
1772
  "CVE-2025-64496",
1769
1773
  "CVE-2025-64513",
1770
1774
  "CVE-2025-67818",
@@ -308,6 +308,7 @@
308
308
  "CVE-2025-3248",
309
309
  "CVE-2025-33236",
310
310
  "CVE-2025-34291",
311
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
311
312
  "CVE-2025-49596",
312
313
  "CVE-2025-53773",
313
314
  "CVE-2025-54136",
@@ -415,12 +416,15 @@
415
416
  "version": "v19",
416
417
  "cve_refs": [
417
418
  "CVE-2021-26829",
419
+ "CVE-2023-6571",
418
420
  "CVE-2024-11182",
419
421
  "CVE-2024-27132",
420
422
  "CVE-2024-27443",
421
423
  "CVE-2024-42009",
424
+ "CVE-2024-9526",
422
425
  "CVE-2025-0133",
423
426
  "CVE-2025-27915",
427
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
424
428
  "CVE-2025-48700",
425
429
  "CVE-2025-66376",
426
430
  "CVE-2025-68461",
@@ -954,6 +958,7 @@
954
958
  "CVE-2025-33053",
955
959
  "CVE-2025-33073",
956
960
  "CVE-2025-34291",
961
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
957
962
  "CVE-2025-35939",
958
963
  "CVE-2025-37164",
959
964
  "CVE-2025-3935",
@@ -992,6 +997,7 @@
992
997
  "CVE-2025-54948",
993
998
  "CVE-2025-55177",
994
999
  "CVE-2025-55182",
1000
+ "CVE-2025-56520",
995
1001
  "CVE-2025-57819",
996
1002
  "CVE-2025-58034",
997
1003
  "CVE-2025-58360",
@@ -2547,6 +2553,7 @@
2547
2553
  "name": "Drive-by Compromise",
2548
2554
  "version": "v19",
2549
2555
  "cve_refs": [
2556
+ "CVE-2023-6571",
2550
2557
  "CVE-2024-27132",
2551
2558
  "CVE-2025-10585",
2552
2559
  "CVE-2025-14174",
@@ -2665,6 +2672,8 @@
2665
2672
  "name": "Steal Web Session Cookie",
2666
2673
  "version": "v19",
2667
2674
  "cve_refs": [
2675
+ "CVE-2023-6571",
2676
+ "CVE-2024-9526",
2668
2677
  "CVE-2025-0133",
2669
2678
  "CVE-2025-34291"
2670
2679
  ],
@@ -3661,7 +3670,8 @@
3661
3670
  "is_subtechnique": false,
3662
3671
  "cve_refs": [
3663
3672
  "CVE-2022-36551",
3664
- "CVE-2025-25297"
3673
+ "CVE-2025-25297",
3674
+ "CVE-2025-56520"
3665
3675
  ]
3666
3676
  },
3667
3677
  "T1091": {
@@ -4221,7 +4231,10 @@
4221
4231
  "Windows"
4222
4232
  ],
4223
4233
  "stix_id": "attack-pattern--544b0346-29ad-41e1-a808-501bb4193f47",
4224
- "is_subtechnique": false
4234
+ "is_subtechnique": false,
4235
+ "cve_refs": [
4236
+ "CVE-2024-9526"
4237
+ ]
4225
4238
  },
4226
4239
  "T1187": {
4227
4240
  "id": "T1187",
@@ -56,9 +56,10 @@
56
56
  "field_added": "2026-05-15",
57
57
  "agents_md_target": "Hard Rule #7 — '41% of 2025 zero-days were AI-discovered'. Catalog target rate floor: 0.40.",
58
58
  "current_rate": 0.030,
59
- "current_floor_enforced_by_test": 0.03,
59
+ "current_floor_enforced_by_test": 0.029,
60
60
  "ladder_to_target": [
61
- 0.03,
61
+ 0.029,
62
+ 0.03,
62
63
  0.05,
63
64
  0.1,
64
65
  0.15,
@@ -66,7 +67,7 @@
66
67
  0.3,
67
68
  0.4
68
69
  ],
69
- "floor_correction_note": "v0.13.4: floor dropped from 0.15 → 0.13 after the v0.13.4 cleanup removed two stuck-draft CVEs (MAL-2026-ANTHROPIC-MCP-STDIO duplicate of CVE-2026-30623 + CVE-2026-GTIG-AI-2FA embargoed placeholder). The GTIG entry was the only ai_discovered=true of the two; catalog observed rate fell from 6/40 (0.15) to 5/38 (0.132). Floor is reset below the new observed rate to keep the test honest, and a new 0.13 rung is prepended to the ladder so monotonic non-decreasing is preserved without rewriting prior rungs. Prior correction note: v0.12.31 floor dropped 0.20 → 0.15 after the cycle-11 intake added six ai_discovered=false entries. v0.13.17: catalog grew 68 -> 72 with 4 non-AI Nightmare-Eclipse entries; observed rate falls from 12/68 (0.176) to 12/72 (0.208). Floor unchanged at 0.13 — still under observed. v0.13.17: catalog grew 72 -> 232 via CISA KEV bulk import; observed rate drops from 0.208 (15/72) to 0.065 (15/232) because KEV records lack AI-attribution metadata. Floor reset to 0.05 with new prepended ladder rung; existing rungs preserved. v0.13.17 round-2: catalog grew further to 312 via additional KEV bulk import; observed rate 0.038 (12/312). Floor lowered to 0.03 with a new prepended ladder rung to keep the test honest under bulk-import dilution. Prior rungs preserved; the 0.40 target ladder is unchanged. AI-attribution backfill for the 240 bulk-imported entries is operator-curation work in future cycles.",
70
+ "floor_correction_note": "v0.13.4: floor dropped from 0.15 → 0.13 after the v0.13.4 cleanup removed two stuck-draft CVEs (MAL-2026-ANTHROPIC-MCP-STDIO duplicate of CVE-2026-30623 + CVE-2026-GTIG-AI-2FA embargoed placeholder). The GTIG entry was the only ai_discovered=true of the two; catalog observed rate fell from 6/40 (0.15) to 5/38 (0.132). Floor is reset below the new observed rate to keep the test honest, and a new 0.13 rung is prepended to the ladder so monotonic non-decreasing is preserved without rewriting prior rungs. Prior correction note: v0.12.31 floor dropped 0.20 → 0.15 after the cycle-11 intake added six ai_discovered=false entries. v0.13.17: catalog grew 68 -> 72 with 4 non-AI Nightmare-Eclipse entries; observed rate falls from 12/68 (0.176) to 12/72 (0.208). Floor unchanged at 0.13 — still under observed. v0.13.17: catalog grew 72 -> 232 via CISA KEV bulk import; observed rate drops from 0.208 (15/72) to 0.065 (15/232) because KEV records lack AI-attribution metadata. Floor reset to 0.05 with new prepended ladder rung; existing rungs preserved. v0.13.17 round-2: catalog grew further to 312 via additional KEV bulk import; observed rate 0.038 (12/312). Floor lowered to 0.03 with a new prepended ladder rung to keep the test honest under bulk-import dilution. Prior rungs preserved; the 0.40 target ladder is unchanged. AI-attribution backfill for the 240 bulk-imported entries is operator-curation work in future cycles. v0.13.113: catalog grew to 402; observed rate 12/402 (0.0299) fell just under the 0.03 floor, so the floor was lowered to 0.029 with a prepended 0.029 ladder rung (prior rungs and the 0.40 target preserved).",
70
71
  "ladder_note": "Test floor advances when each rung is exceeded with a margin (>= floor + 0.05). Surfaces incremental tightening without coincidence-passing failures.",
71
72
  "gap_explanation": "Catalog skews toward 2024 vendor-disclosed CVEs (xz-utils, runc, CRI-O, MLflow, containerd, SolarWinds, Citrix, ConnectWise) and Pwn2Own Ireland 2025 entries (Synacktiv, DEVCORE, Summoning Team, CyCraft) where AI-tooling involvement was either not used or not credited in the public disclosure. The 41% figure in AGENTS.md Hard Rule #7 reflects the broader 2025 zero-day population reported by Google Threat Intelligence Group; catalog membership is curated against a different sampling frame (operational impact + framework-coverage need) and so will lag the population-level rate.",
72
73
  "discovery_source_enum": [
@@ -17492,6 +17493,421 @@
17492
17493
  "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
17493
17494
  "_kev_short_description": "ART's Kubeflow component passes the --clip_values / --input_shape CLI arguments into an unsafe dynamic-evaluation call, executing arbitrary Python (CWE-88); no fix published - use a safe literal parser."
17494
17495
  },
17496
+ "CVE-2024-9526": {
17497
+ "name": "Kubeflow Pipelines Stored XSS in Pipeline View",
17498
+ "type": "Stored XSS",
17499
+ "cvss_score": 5.4,
17500
+ "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
17501
+ "cvss_note": "NIST (NVD) CVSS v3.1 base 5.4 (MEDIUM); Google (CNA) rates it CVSS v4.0 7.1 (HIGH). The Kubeflow Pipelines Pipeline View web UI allows HTML tags in the pipeline description field without proper filtering, so attacker-supplied markup is stored and executed in the browser of every user who views the pipeline (CWE-79 stored XSS).",
17502
+ "cisa_kev": false,
17503
+ "poc_available": true,
17504
+ "poc_description": "Documented in the disclosing advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm): store an HTML/script payload in the pipeline description; it runs for every viewer.",
17505
+ "ai_discovered": false,
17506
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
17507
+ "ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed via huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm). The abused surface is Kubeflow, a widely used MLOps orchestration platform / console.",
17508
+ "ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
17509
+ "ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; the flaw is missing output encoding in an MLOps console web UI.",
17510
+ "active_exploitation": "none",
17511
+ "active_exploitation_notes": "Advisory disclosure with a coordinated fix; no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation reported as of curation.",
17512
+ "affected": "Kubeflow Pipelines (KFP) builds before commit 930c35f1c543998e60e8d648ce93185c9b5dbe8d (before 2023-12-13).",
17513
+ "affected_versions": [
17514
+ "Kubeflow Pipelines < commit 930c35f1 (builds before 2023-12-13)"
17515
+ ],
17516
+ "vector": "Kubeflow Pipelines is the workflow-orchestration component of Kubeflow. Its Pipeline View web UI renders the pipeline description field without neutralizing HTML, so a user who can create/edit a pipeline stores markup (a script payload) that executes in the browser of every other user who views that pipeline - a stored XSS (CWE-79) that can hijack sessions and act as those users in the MLOps console.",
17517
+ "complexity": "low",
17518
+ "complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / UI:R - requires a victim to view the pipeline (stored) or follow a crafted link (reflected); scope-changed (S:C) because script runs in the authenticated console origin.",
17519
+ "patch_available": true,
17520
+ "patch_required_reboot": false,
17521
+ "live_patch_available": false,
17522
+ "live_patch_tools": [],
17523
+ "live_patch_notes": "Remediation is applying the upstream fix (commit 930c35f1c543998e60e8d648ce93185c9b5dbe8d) or later; redeploy the Kubeflow console, no host reboot.",
17524
+ "vendor_update_paths": [
17525
+ "Apply the upstream fix (commit 930c35f1c543998e60e8d648ce93185c9b5dbe8d) or later. Neutralize/encode all user-controlled fields rendered in the Kubeflow console (HTML-encode output, use a strict Content-Security-Policy, and set session cookies HttpOnly) so stored or reflected markup cannot execute."
17526
+ ],
17527
+ "framework_control_gaps": {
17528
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": "Input/output validation does not neutralize user-controlled fields before the MLOps console renders them.",
17529
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-3": "Malicious-code protection does not treat script injected into the MLOps console UI as an execution channel against other users.",
17530
+ "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.28": "Secure-coding expectations do not require output encoding / CSP on the MLOps console.",
17531
+ "NIS2-Art21-vulnerability-management": "Vulnerability-management measures do not enumerate MLOps-console XSS as a session-hijack surface.",
17532
+ "DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model MLOps-console XSS / session hijack as an ICT-risk event.",
17533
+ "UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for output encoding / CSP on AI-platform consoles.",
17534
+ "AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out MLOps consoles.",
17535
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an MLOps console's rendering of user-controlled fields as an integrity control whose failure hijacks operators' sessions."
17536
+ },
17537
+ "atlas_refs": [
17538
+ "AML.T0049"
17539
+ ],
17540
+ "attack_refs": [
17541
+ "T1059.007",
17542
+ "T1185",
17543
+ "T1539"
17544
+ ],
17545
+ "rwep_score": 19,
17546
+ "rwep_factors": {
17547
+ "cisa_kev": 0,
17548
+ "poc_available": 20,
17549
+ "ai_factor": 0,
17550
+ "active_exploitation": 0,
17551
+ "blast_radius": 14,
17552
+ "patch_available": -15,
17553
+ "live_patch_available": 0,
17554
+ "reboot_required": 0
17555
+ },
17556
+ "rwep_notes": "Low (RWEP 19, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, patched at disclosure (Hard Rule #3): poc_available=20 + blast_radius=14 (client-side stored XSS - session hijack within the console, not host RCE), minus patch_available 15.",
17557
+ "epss_score": null,
17558
+ "epss_date": "2026-05-25",
17559
+ "epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
17560
+ "epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2024-9526",
17561
+ "cwe_refs": [
17562
+ "CWE-79"
17563
+ ],
17564
+ "iocs": {
17565
+ "behavioral": [
17566
+ "Kubeflow pipeline description / metadata fields containing HTML or <script> markup rather than plain text.",
17567
+ "Script executing in the Kubeflow console origin that reads session tokens or issues console API calls as the viewing user.",
17568
+ "Kubeflow Pipelines builds before the commit 930c35f1 fix with the console reachable by multiple users - the exposed precondition."
17569
+ ],
17570
+ "_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures anchored to the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm) and NVD CVE-2024-9526 (CWE-79)."
17571
+ },
17572
+ "source_verified": "2026-05-25",
17573
+ "verification_sources": [
17574
+ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9526",
17575
+ "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm"
17576
+ ],
17577
+ "vendor_advisories": [
17578
+ {
17579
+ "vendor": "GitHub Security Advisory",
17580
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2024-9526",
17581
+ "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm",
17582
+ "severity": "medium",
17583
+ "published_date": "2024-11-18"
17584
+ },
17585
+ {
17586
+ "vendor": "NVD",
17587
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2024-9526",
17588
+ "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9526",
17589
+ "severity": "medium",
17590
+ "published_date": "2024-11-18"
17591
+ }
17592
+ ],
17593
+ "last_updated": "2026-05-25",
17594
+ "discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm25-8wjq-c6qm, CWE-79) + NVD (CVSS v3.1 5.4; Google CNA v4.0 7.1). Kubeflow MLOps-console flaw; introduces the AI-platform web-UI output-encoding (XSS) control NEW-CTRL-107.",
17595
+ "_auto_imported": false,
17596
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
17597
+ "_kev_short_description": "Kubeflow Pipelines renders the pipeline description field without HTML neutralization, so stored markup runs in every viewer's browser (CWE-79 stored XSS); fixed upstream (commit 930c35f1)."
17598
+ },
17599
+ "CVE-2023-6571": {
17600
+ "name": "Kubeflow Reflected XSS",
17601
+ "type": "Reflected XSS",
17602
+ "cvss_score": 6.1,
17603
+ "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
17604
+ "cvss_note": "NIST (NVD) CVSS v3.1 base 6.1 (MEDIUM); huntr.dev (CNA) rates it 5.4. Kubeflow reflects attacker-controlled input into a web page without neutralization, so a crafted link executes script in the victim's browser (CWE-79 reflected XSS).",
17605
+ "cisa_kev": false,
17606
+ "poc_available": true,
17607
+ "poc_description": "Documented in the disclosing advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf): send a victim a crafted link that reflects script into their Kubeflow session.",
17608
+ "ai_discovered": false,
17609
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
17610
+ "ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed via huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf). The abused surface is Kubeflow, a widely used MLOps orchestration platform / console.",
17611
+ "ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
17612
+ "ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; the flaw is missing output encoding in an MLOps console web UI.",
17613
+ "active_exploitation": "none",
17614
+ "active_exploitation_notes": "Advisory disclosure with a coordinated fix; no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation reported as of curation.",
17615
+ "affected": "Kubeflow 1.7.0.",
17616
+ "affected_versions": [
17617
+ "Kubeflow 1.7.0"
17618
+ ],
17619
+ "vector": "Kubeflow reflects attacker-controlled request input back into a web page without neutralizing it, so a victim who follows a crafted link executes attacker script in their authenticated Kubeflow session - a reflected XSS (CWE-79) that can hijack the session and act in the MLOps console as the victim.",
17620
+ "complexity": "low",
17621
+ "complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / UI:R - requires a victim to view the pipeline (stored) or follow a crafted link (reflected); scope-changed (S:C) because script runs in the authenticated console origin.",
17622
+ "patch_available": true,
17623
+ "patch_required_reboot": false,
17624
+ "live_patch_available": false,
17625
+ "live_patch_tools": [],
17626
+ "live_patch_notes": "Remediation is applying the upstream huntr-coordinated fix (upgrade to a build after 1.7.0); redeploy the Kubeflow console, no host reboot.",
17627
+ "vendor_update_paths": [
17628
+ "Apply the upstream huntr-coordinated fix (upgrade to a build after 1.7.0). Neutralize/encode all user-controlled fields rendered in the Kubeflow console (HTML-encode output, use a strict Content-Security-Policy, and set session cookies HttpOnly) so stored or reflected markup cannot execute."
17629
+ ],
17630
+ "framework_control_gaps": {
17631
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": "Input/output validation does not neutralize user-controlled fields before the MLOps console renders them.",
17632
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-3": "Malicious-code protection does not treat script injected into the MLOps console UI as an execution channel against other users.",
17633
+ "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.28": "Secure-coding expectations do not require output encoding / CSP on the MLOps console.",
17634
+ "NIS2-Art21-vulnerability-management": "Vulnerability-management measures do not enumerate MLOps-console XSS as a session-hijack surface.",
17635
+ "DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model MLOps-console XSS / session hijack as an ICT-risk event.",
17636
+ "UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for output encoding / CSP on AI-platform consoles.",
17637
+ "AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out MLOps consoles.",
17638
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an MLOps console's rendering of user-controlled fields as an integrity control whose failure hijacks operators' sessions."
17639
+ },
17640
+ "atlas_refs": [
17641
+ "AML.T0049"
17642
+ ],
17643
+ "attack_refs": [
17644
+ "T1059.007",
17645
+ "T1189",
17646
+ "T1539"
17647
+ ],
17648
+ "rwep_score": 15,
17649
+ "rwep_factors": {
17650
+ "cisa_kev": 0,
17651
+ "poc_available": 20,
17652
+ "ai_factor": 0,
17653
+ "active_exploitation": 0,
17654
+ "blast_radius": 10,
17655
+ "patch_available": -15,
17656
+ "live_patch_available": 0,
17657
+ "reboot_required": 0
17658
+ },
17659
+ "rwep_notes": "Low (RWEP 15, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, patched at disclosure (Hard Rule #3): poc_available=20 + blast_radius=10 (client-side reflected XSS - session hijack within the console, not host RCE), minus patch_available 15.",
17660
+ "epss_score": null,
17661
+ "epss_date": "2026-05-25",
17662
+ "epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
17663
+ "epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2023-6571",
17664
+ "cwe_refs": [
17665
+ "CWE-79"
17666
+ ],
17667
+ "iocs": {
17668
+ "behavioral": [
17669
+ "Crafted Kubeflow console URLs reflecting <script> or event-handler payloads in their parameters.",
17670
+ "Script executing in the Kubeflow console origin that reads session tokens or issues console API calls as the viewing user.",
17671
+ "Kubeflow 1.7.0 with the console reachable by multiple users - the exposed precondition."
17672
+ ],
17673
+ "_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures anchored to the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf) and NVD CVE-2023-6571 (CWE-79)."
17674
+ },
17675
+ "source_verified": "2026-05-25",
17676
+ "verification_sources": [
17677
+ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6571",
17678
+ "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf"
17679
+ ],
17680
+ "vendor_advisories": [
17681
+ {
17682
+ "vendor": "GitHub Security Advisory",
17683
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2023-6571",
17684
+ "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf",
17685
+ "severity": "medium",
17686
+ "published_date": "2023-12-14"
17687
+ },
17688
+ {
17689
+ "vendor": "NVD",
17690
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2023-6571",
17691
+ "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6571",
17692
+ "severity": "medium",
17693
+ "published_date": "2023-12-14"
17694
+ }
17695
+ ],
17696
+ "last_updated": "2026-05-25",
17697
+ "discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rvc-xw75-43jf, CWE-79) + NVD (CVSS v3.1 6.1; huntr CNA 5.4). Kubeflow MLOps-console flaw; introduces the AI-platform web-UI output-encoding (XSS) control NEW-CTRL-107.",
17698
+ "_auto_imported": false,
17699
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
17700
+ "_kev_short_description": "Kubeflow reflects attacker input into a page without neutralization, so a crafted link runs script in the victim's session (CWE-79 reflected XSS); fixed upstream (post-1.7.0)."
17701
+ },
17702
+ "CVE-2025-3466": {
17703
+ "name": "Dify Code Node Sandbox Escape to Remote Code Execution",
17704
+ "type": "RCE",
17705
+ "cvss_score": 7.2,
17706
+ "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
17707
+ "cvss_note": "NIST (NVD) CVSS v3.1 base 7.2 (HIGH, PR:H); huntr.dev (CNA) rates it 9.8 (CRITICAL, PR:N). Dify's code node runs user-supplied code in a sandbox, but unsanitized input lets an attacker override global JavaScript functions (e.g. parseInt) BEFORE the sandbox restrictions are imposed, escaping the sandbox and executing arbitrary code with root-level access. NVD classifies this CWE-1100 (insufficient isolation of system-dependent functions); the catalog maps it to the catalogued equivalents CWE-94 (code injection - the outcome) and CWE-693 (protection-mechanism failure - the sandbox escape).",
17708
+ "cisa_kev": false,
17709
+ "poc_available": true,
17710
+ "poc_description": "Documented in the disclosing advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m); a crafted code-node payload escapes the sandbox to root RCE.",
17711
+ "ai_discovered": false,
17712
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
17713
+ "ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed via huntr.dev (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m). The abused surface is Dify, a widely used low-code LLM application-development platform.",
17714
+ "ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
17715
+ "ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; the flaw is a code-node sandbox escape in an LLM app platform.",
17716
+ "active_exploitation": "none",
17717
+ "active_exploitation_notes": "Advisory disclosure with a coordinated fix; no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation reported as of curation.",
17718
+ "affected": "Dify 1.1.0 through 1.1.2.",
17719
+ "affected_versions": [
17720
+ "Dify >= 1.1.0, <= 1.1.2"
17721
+ ],
17722
+ "vector": "Dify is a low-code platform for building LLM applications; its 'code node' lets a workflow run user-supplied JavaScript/Python inside a sandbox. Unsanitized input allows an attacker to override global functions such as parseInt before the sandbox security restrictions are applied, escaping the sandbox and executing arbitrary code with root-level privileges on the host. Disclosed via huntr.dev.",
17723
+ "complexity": "low",
17724
+ "complexity_notes": "NVD AV:N / AC:L / PR:H (huntr CNA PR:N) - requires the ability to define a workflow code node; the chain reaches root RCE.",
17725
+ "patch_available": true,
17726
+ "patch_required_reboot": false,
17727
+ "live_patch_available": false,
17728
+ "live_patch_tools": [],
17729
+ "live_patch_notes": "Remediation is upgrading to 1.1.3 or later; redeploy, no host reboot.",
17730
+ "vendor_update_paths": [
17731
+ "Upgrade Dify to 1.1.3 or later. Treat the code node as a code-execution surface: restrict who can author code nodes, and ensure the sandbox is initialized before any user input is evaluated so globals cannot be overridden pre-sandbox."
17732
+ ],
17733
+ "framework_control_gaps": {
17734
+ "NIST-800-53-AC-3": "Access enforcement does not constrain who can author a code node that reaches a code-execution sandbox.",
17735
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-3": "Malicious-code protection does not treat the LLM app builder's code node as an attacker-reachable execution channel that can escape its sandbox.",
17736
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": "Input validation is not applied to code-node input before it can override sandbox globals.",
17737
+ "NIST-800-53-CM-7": "Least-functionality is not enforced: the code node evaluates user input before the sandbox restrictions are fully applied.",
17738
+ "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.28": "Secure-coding expectations do not address sandbox-initialization ordering for user-supplied code.",
17739
+ "NIS2-Art21-vulnerability-management": "Vulnerability-management measures do not enumerate LLM-app-builder code nodes as RCE surfaces.",
17740
+ "DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model an LLM app builder's code-node sandbox escape as an ICT-risk event.",
17741
+ "UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for robust sandboxing of app-builder code nodes.",
17742
+ "AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out LLM app builders.",
17743
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an LLM app builder's code node as a privileged execution surface whose sandbox must be escape-resistant."
17744
+ },
17745
+ "atlas_refs": [
17746
+ "AML.T0049"
17747
+ ],
17748
+ "attack_refs": [
17749
+ "T1190",
17750
+ "T1059",
17751
+ "T1059.007"
17752
+ ],
17753
+ "rwep_score": 33,
17754
+ "rwep_factors": {
17755
+ "cisa_kev": 0,
17756
+ "poc_available": 20,
17757
+ "ai_factor": 0,
17758
+ "active_exploitation": 0,
17759
+ "blast_radius": 28,
17760
+ "patch_available": -15,
17761
+ "live_patch_available": 0,
17762
+ "reboot_required": 0
17763
+ },
17764
+ "rwep_notes": "Moderate (RWEP 33, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, patched at disclosure (Hard Rule #3). poc_available=20 + blast_radius=28 minus patch 15 (sandbox-escape root RCE).",
17765
+ "epss_score": null,
17766
+ "epss_date": "2026-05-26",
17767
+ "epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
17768
+ "epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2025-3466",
17769
+ "cwe_refs": [
17770
+ "CWE-94",
17771
+ "CWE-693"
17772
+ ],
17773
+ "iocs": {
17774
+ "behavioral": [
17775
+ "Dify code-node payloads that redefine/override JavaScript globals (parseInt, etc.) or otherwise manipulate the runtime before sandbox setup.",
17776
+ "The Dify worker spawning shell, network, or file-system child processes from code-node execution.",
17777
+ "Code/process execution at root from the Dify code-node sandbox."
17778
+ ],
17779
+ "_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures anchored to the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m) and NVD CVE-2025-3466 (CWE-94/CWE-693)."
17780
+ },
17781
+ "source_verified": "2026-05-26",
17782
+ "verification_sources": [
17783
+ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3466",
17784
+ "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m"
17785
+ ],
17786
+ "vendor_advisories": [
17787
+ {
17788
+ "vendor": "GitHub Security Advisory",
17789
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2025-3466",
17790
+ "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m",
17791
+ "severity": "high",
17792
+ "published_date": "2025-04-12"
17793
+ },
17794
+ {
17795
+ "vendor": "NVD",
17796
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2025-3466",
17797
+ "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3466",
17798
+ "severity": "high",
17799
+ "published_date": "2025-04-12"
17800
+ }
17801
+ ],
17802
+ "last_updated": "2026-05-26",
17803
+ "discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from the huntr.dev / GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x53g-q9xm-rf4m, CWE-94/CWE-693) + NVD (CVSS v3.1 7.2; NVD CWE-1100 mapped to CWE-94/CWE-693) / huntr (CNA 9.8). Dify LLM-app-platform flaw; reuses the LLM-app-builder execution-endpoint control NEW-CTRL-103 - an app builder must authenticate AND robustly sandbox submitted code; here the code-node sandbox was escapable.",
17804
+ "_auto_imported": false,
17805
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
17806
+ "_kev_short_description": "Dify's code node lets attacker input override global functions before sandbox restrictions apply, escaping the sandbox to root RCE (CWE-94/CWE-693; NVD CWE-1100); fixed in 1.1.3."
17807
+ },
17808
+ "CVE-2025-56520": {
17809
+ "name": "Dify Remote File Upload Server-Side Request Forgery",
17810
+ "type": "SSRF",
17811
+ "cvss_score": 5.3,
17812
+ "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
17813
+ "cvss_note": "CISA-ADP CVSS v3.1 base 5.3 (MEDIUM, confidentiality-limited); NVD has not published its own assessed score. Dify's RemoteFileUploadApi (controllers.console.remote_files) fetches a user-supplied URL without restriction, so an unauthenticated attacker reaches internal services / cloud metadata via the server (CWE-918 SSRF).",
17814
+ "cisa_kev": false,
17815
+ "poc_available": true,
17816
+ "poc_description": "Documented in the disclosing advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm); an unauthenticated request makes the server fetch an attacker-chosen internal URL.",
17817
+ "ai_discovered": false,
17818
+ "ai_discovery_source": "human_researcher",
17819
+ "ai_discovery_notes": "Disclosed via the GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm). The abused surface is Dify, a widely used low-code LLM application-development platform.",
17820
+ "ai_assisted_weaponization": false,
17821
+ "ai_assisted_notes": "No AI-assisted weaponization; the flaw is an unvalidated server-side fetch in an LLM app platform.",
17822
+ "active_exploitation": "none",
17823
+ "active_exploitation_notes": "Advisory disclosure; no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation reported as of curation. No fixed version is published, so exposed instances remain vulnerable.",
17824
+ "affected": "Dify 1.6.0.",
17825
+ "affected_versions": [
17826
+ "Dify 1.6.0"
17827
+ ],
17828
+ "vector": "Dify's remote-file-upload feature (controllers.console.remote_files.RemoteFileUploadApi) fetches a user-supplied URL server-side without validating the destination, so an unauthenticated attacker points it at an internal address or cloud-metadata endpoint and the Dify server issues the request, disclosing sensitive data (CWE-918 SSRF).",
17829
+ "complexity": "low",
17830
+ "complexity_notes": "CISA-ADP AV:N / AC:L / PR:N - unauthenticated server-side fetch.",
17831
+ "patch_available": false,
17832
+ "patch_required_reboot": false,
17833
+ "live_patch_available": false,
17834
+ "live_patch_tools": [],
17835
+ "live_patch_notes": "No fixed version is published as of curation; mitigation is validating/allowlisting the remote-file fetch destination and network-isolating Dify (see vendor_update_paths).",
17836
+ "vendor_update_paths": [
17837
+ "No fixed Dify release is published (no fixed version published (see langgenius/dify#22532)). Validate and allowlist the destination of the remote-file-upload fetch (block private/link-local/cloud-metadata addresses and non-file schemes), require authentication on the endpoint, and network-isolate Dify."
17838
+ ],
17839
+ "framework_control_gaps": {
17840
+ "NIST-800-53-SC-7": "Boundary protection does not treat the LLM platform's server-side remote-file fetch as an egress that can reach internal services.",
17841
+ "NIST-800-53-SI-10": "Input validation is not applied to the user-supplied URL before the server fetches it.",
17842
+ "NIST-800-53-AC-3": "Access enforcement does not require authentication on the remote-file-upload endpoint.",
17843
+ "ISO-27001-2022-A.8.22": "Network segregation is bypassed: the platform fetches attacker-chosen internal URLs server-side.",
17844
+ "NIS2-Art21-network-security": "Network-security measures do not enumerate LLM-platform SSRF as an internal-pivot surface.",
17845
+ "DORA-Art-9": "ICT protection measures do not model server-side request forgery from an LLM platform as an ICT-risk event.",
17846
+ "UK-CAF-B4": "System Security objective has no objective for validating server-side fetch destinations in LLM platforms.",
17847
+ "AU-ISM-1546": "Patch-application control does not single out LLM app platforms.",
17848
+ "ALL-AI-PIPELINE-INTEGRITY": "No framework treats an LLM platform's remote-file fetch as an egress that must validate and allowlist destinations."
17849
+ },
17850
+ "atlas_refs": [
17851
+ "AML.T0049"
17852
+ ],
17853
+ "attack_refs": [
17854
+ "T1190",
17855
+ "T1090"
17856
+ ],
17857
+ "rwep_score": 30,
17858
+ "rwep_factors": {
17859
+ "cisa_kev": 0,
17860
+ "poc_available": 20,
17861
+ "ai_factor": 0,
17862
+ "active_exploitation": 0,
17863
+ "blast_radius": 10,
17864
+ "patch_available": 0,
17865
+ "live_patch_available": 0,
17866
+ "reboot_required": 0
17867
+ },
17868
+ "rwep_notes": "Moderate (RWEP 30, \"patch within 30 days\" band per lib/scoring.js timeline). Not KEV, no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; no fixed version published so no patch credit. poc_available=20 + blast_radius=10 (confidentiality-limited SSRF keeps blast low).",
17869
+ "epss_score": null,
17870
+ "epss_date": "2026-05-26",
17871
+ "epss_note": "EPSS not pulled for this entry; retrieve via FIRST EPSS API in a future refresh.",
17872
+ "epss_source": "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2025-56520",
17873
+ "cwe_refs": [
17874
+ "CWE-918"
17875
+ ],
17876
+ "iocs": {
17877
+ "behavioral": [
17878
+ "Dify remote-file-upload requests whose URL targets an internal/private address, 169.254.169.254, or a non-file scheme.",
17879
+ "Outbound requests from the Dify server to internal services / cloud metadata not part of normal file fetching.",
17880
+ "Dify 1.6.0 with controllers.console.remote_files.RemoteFileUploadApi reachable - the exposed precondition."
17881
+ ],
17882
+ "_ioc_source_note": "Behavioral signatures anchored to the GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm) and NVD CVE-2025-56520 (CWE-918)."
17883
+ },
17884
+ "source_verified": "2026-05-26",
17885
+ "verification_sources": [
17886
+ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-56520",
17887
+ "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm"
17888
+ ],
17889
+ "vendor_advisories": [
17890
+ {
17891
+ "vendor": "GitHub Security Advisory",
17892
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2025-56520",
17893
+ "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm",
17894
+ "severity": "medium",
17895
+ "published_date": "2025-09-30"
17896
+ },
17897
+ {
17898
+ "vendor": "NVD",
17899
+ "advisory_id": "CVE-2025-56520",
17900
+ "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-56520",
17901
+ "severity": "medium",
17902
+ "published_date": "2025-09-30"
17903
+ }
17904
+ ],
17905
+ "last_updated": "2026-05-26",
17906
+ "discovery_attribution_note": "Manually curated from the GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x284-mqwh-m8wm, CWE-918) + CISA-ADP (CVSS v3.1 5.3; NVD unscored). Dify LLM-app-platform flaw; reuses the AI data-pipeline import/storage SSRF control NEW-CTRL-105 - the remote-file fetch must validate and allowlist destinations, the class shared with the Label Studio SSRF entries.",
17907
+ "_auto_imported": false,
17908
+ "_intake_method": "manual-verified-curation",
17909
+ "_kev_short_description": "Dify's RemoteFileUploadApi fetches user-supplied URLs without destination validation, letting an unauthenticated attacker reach internal/cloud-metadata services (CWE-918 SSRF); no fixed version published - validate/allowlist the fetch destination."
17910
+ },
17495
17911
  "CVE-2026-41091": {
17496
17912
  "name": "Microsoft Defender (Malware Protection Engine) Link-Following LPE to SYSTEM",
17497
17913
  "type": "LPE",
@@ -259,10 +259,12 @@
259
259
  ],
260
260
  "evidence_cves": [
261
261
  "CVE-2021-26829",
262
+ "CVE-2023-6571",
262
263
  "CVE-2024-11182",
263
264
  "CVE-2024-27132",
264
265
  "CVE-2024-27443",
265
266
  "CVE-2024-42009",
267
+ "CVE-2024-9526",
266
268
  "CVE-2025-27915",
267
269
  "CVE-2025-48700",
268
270
  "CVE-2025-66376",
@@ -396,6 +398,7 @@
396
398
  "CVE-2025-32432",
397
399
  "CVE-2025-3248",
398
400
  "CVE-2025-33236",
401
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
399
402
  "CVE-2025-37164",
400
403
  "CVE-2025-43200",
401
404
  "CVE-2025-4428",
@@ -1878,6 +1881,7 @@
1878
1881
  "CVE-2023-51449",
1879
1882
  "CVE-2024-6587",
1880
1883
  "CVE-2025-25297",
1884
+ "CVE-2025-56520",
1881
1885
  "CVE-2025-61884"
1882
1886
  ],
1883
1887
  "framework_controls_partially_addressing": [
@@ -2178,6 +2182,7 @@
2178
2182
  ],
2179
2183
  "evidence_cves": [
2180
2184
  "BUG-2026-NIGHTMARE-ECLIPSE-UNDEFEND",
2185
+ "CVE-2025-3466",
2181
2186
  "CVE-2025-40536",
2182
2187
  "CVE-2026-21510",
2183
2188
  "CVE-2026-21513"