@bendyline/gilde 0.1.3 → 0.1.5

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/receipt-ocr-ledger/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/recipe-capture/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "inspect-review",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Rescue a handwritten recipe card without sanding off its soul: transcribe the original faithfully — spelling quirks, margin notes, and all — standardize quantities in a separate block alongside (never instead of) the original wording, and pin the provenance note: whose card, whose kitchen, what they always changed.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/recipe-capture/manifest.json

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/record-a-relative/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "people-events-growth",
+  "accents": [
+    "dusty rose",
+    "sage",
+    "muted terracotta"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Bank an elder's interview while the telling is fresh: file the transcript, pull the people, places, and dates into the family record with their source, and write the follow-up questions — because the questions you didn't ask are the ones that vanish.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/record-a-relative/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/recurring-invoice-run/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "operate-maintain",
+  "accents": [
+    "sage",
+    "ochre",
+    "muted terracotta"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Run a recurring billing batch: for each active client/subscription due this period, generate a correctly-numbered, line-itemed invoice with taxes and totals, render it, and send it — once, idempotently, with a sent-log.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/recurring-invoice-run/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/refactor-module/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "inspect-review",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Refactor a module to improve its structure, readability, or design WITHOUT changing observable behavior — the defining constraint is that the tests stay green throughout.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/refactor-module/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/regex-builder/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "inspect-review",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Build a regular expression that matches exactly the right strings and rejects the wrong ones — specified with concrete should-match and should-NOT-match cases before a single character is written.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/regex-builder/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-announcement/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "communicate-market",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "dusty rose",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Write a public-facing release announcement that turns a shipped version into a compelling story for users — a blog-post / email-style piece that leads with the headline value, shows the marquee features with concrete before/after benefits, links to the full release notes and upgrade path, and ends with a clear call to…",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-announcement/manifest.json

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-notes/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "plan-coordinate",
+  "accents": [
+    "ochre",
+    "sage",
+    "muted indigo"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Turn a raw set of merged commits, pull requests, and ticket IDs into polished, human-readable release notes for a versioned release — grouped by theme (Features, Improvements, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes), written for users rather than engineers, with upgrade/migration callouts surfaced first.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-notes/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-pipeline-ci/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "plan-coordinate",
+  "accents": [
+    "ochre",
+    "sage",
+    "muted indigo"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Author a CI/CD release workflow as a YAML pipeline (GitHub Actions style) that takes a tagged commit and turns it into a published release — running tests and build as gates, then on a version tag building the artifact, generating release notes, publishing the package/image, and creating the GitHub Release, with the…",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-pipeline-ci/manifest.json

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-readiness-review/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "plan-coordinate",
+  "accents": [
+    "ochre",
+    "sage",
+    "muted indigo"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Run a go/no-go release readiness review against a structured pre-launch checklist and produce a sign-off report with a clear ship decision.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/release-readiness-review/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/reliability-review/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "inspect-review",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Review a codebase for production reliability and resilience risks across asynchronous work, external dependencies, state transitions, resource lifecycles, and recovery paths.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/reliability-review/manifest.json

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/report-pdf/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "write-publish",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "muted indigo",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Produce a polished, print-ready formatted report — quarterly business review, research findings, status report, or analysis writeup — rendered as a clean paginated HTML document that prints cleanly to PDF.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/report-pdf/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-report/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "research-learn",
+  "accents": [
+    "sage",
+    "muted indigo",
+    "terracotta"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Produce a rigorously cited research report that answers a specific question end to end: a planner first decomposes the question into sub-questions and locks the scope, then a researcher gathers and logs primary and secondary sources with inline citations, then a copywriter writes a structured markdown report…",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-report/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-to-document/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "write-publish",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted terracotta",
+    "muted indigo",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Research a question with logged sources, write a cited report, then produce a real Word document (.docx, plus PDF on request) via DocBlocks and save it into the project's artifacts.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-to-document/manifest.json

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-to-document/versions/1.1.0/craftbook.json

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+{
+  "id": "research-to-document",
+  "name": "Research to Word Document",
+  "description": "Research a question end to end and hand the user a real Word document. Four phases with per-phase gates and a review loop:\n\n1. Scope (planner) — narrow the question, decompose into sub-questions, lock the document structure and source standards -> gated on notes/scope.md\n2. Research (researcher) — gather sources into a citation-keyed source log with extracted facts and cross-checks -> gated on notes/sources.md\n3. Write (copywriter) — the cited markdown report to the locked structure -> gated on report.md\n4. Produce (developer) — DocBlocks: validate report.md against the DOCX target, convert_document to a themed .docx (and .pdf when the user asked for one), preview pages, save_artifact into the project artifacts -> gated on the saved report.docx artifact\n\nA reviewer grades the saved document against the locked acceptance criteria and loops back to the owning phase on a miss. Scoping and source-logging before writing is what keeps a model from fabricating citations; converting only after the report passes keeps the .docx a projection of reviewed prose, never a first draft. Use for 'research X and write it up as a doc', briefing documents, due-diligence summaries, and any deliverable that must arrive as a Word file.",
+  "entryStepId": "scope",
+  "triggers": [
+    "research this and write a doc",
+    "summarize research into a document",
+    "write it up as a word document",
+    "research report as docx",
+    "make a briefing document"
+  ],
+  "toolsets": [
+    {
+      "toolsetId": "docblocks",
+      "sourceId": "bundled",
+      "autoAllow": true,
+      "reason": "convert the finished report to DOCX/PDF, preview pages, and save the file without a prompt per call"
+    }
+  ],
+  "steps": [
+    {
+      "id": "scope",
+      "name": "Scope the question",
+      "description": "Narrow the question, decompose it into sub-questions, and lock the document structure + source standards.",
+      "prompt": "1. Restate the research question in one precise sentence; if it is vague, narrow it to something answerable (entity, timeframe, geography, metric). 2. Decompose it into 3-6 sub-questions that, answered together, fully answer the main question. 3. Lock the document structure: title, executive summary (<=150 words, bottom line first), one section per sub-question, a limitations section, a numbered references list. 4. Lock source standards: minimum independent sources (aim 5+), what counts as authoritative for this topic, recency window. 5. Note the delivery format: a .docx always; also a .pdf if the user asked for one. 6. Write an acceptance-criteria checklist a grader could apply mechanically (every sub-question has a section; every factual claim carries an inline [n] citation that resolves; minimum source count met; limitations section present; executive summary within limit; the saved artifact is a real .docx). Write it all to notes/scope.md and call write_task_note with the narrowed question + sub-questions.",
+      "suggestedRole": "planner",
+      "advanceWhen": {
+        "file": "notes/scope.md",
+        "minBytes": 1,
+        "sniff": "nonempty"
+      },
+      "gate": {
+        "at": "completion",
+        "checks": [
+          {
+            "kind": "minBytes",
+            "file": "notes/scope.md",
+            "bytes": 150
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "sniff",
+            "file": "notes/scope.md",
+            "sniff": "nonempty"
+          }
+        ],
+        "onReject": "scope",
+        "maxAttempts": 3
+      },
+      "next": "research"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "research",
+      "name": "Research and log sources",
+      "description": "Gather authoritative sources into notes/sources.md — citation key, locator, extracted facts, cross-checks.",
+      "prompt": "1. For each sub-question in notes/scope.md, find authoritative sources within the recency window (prefer primary sources and official data; use the web/search tools available this turn). 2. For every source, append an entry to notes/sources.md: citation key [n], title, author/publisher, date, URL or locator, and 1-3 bullet facts with the exact figure or quote. 3. Cross-check every load-bearing or surprising fact against a second independent source and note agreement or conflict. 4. Mark anything you could NOT verify as UNVERIFIED so the writer never states it as fact. 5. Exceed the minimum source count if quality allows; never pad with weak sources. The bar: a source log dense enough that the writer never needs to invent a fact. Keep notes/sources.md the single source of truth; no report prose yet.",
+      "suggestedRole": "researcher",
+      "advanceWhen": {
+        "file": "notes/sources.md",
+        "minBytes": 1,
+        "sniff": "nonempty"
+      },
+      "gate": {
+        "at": "completion",
+        "checks": [
+          {
+            "kind": "minBytes",
+            "file": "notes/sources.md",
+            "bytes": 300
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "sniff",
+            "file": "notes/sources.md",
+            "sniff": "nonempty"
+          }
+        ],
+        "onReject": "research",
+        "maxAttempts": 3
+      },
+      "next": "write"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "write",
+      "name": "Write the report",
+      "description": "Write report.md to the locked structure, every claim cited from the source log.",
+      "prompt": "1. Write report.md following the locked structure from notes/scope.md exactly: title, executive summary <=150 words stating the bottom-line answer, one section per sub-question, a limitations section, a numbered References list. 2. Every factual claim gets an inline citation [n] keyed to References; never state an UNVERIFIED item as fact — hedge it or drop it. 3. Build References directly from notes/sources.md so every [n] resolves and no citation is invented. 4. Lead each section with its answer, then the evidence; keep prose tight, use `##` for sections and `###` sparingly — the heading structure becomes the Word document's outline. 5. Use markdown tables for genuinely tabular evidence. 6. On a loop-back, fix only the gaps the reviewer named. Call write_task_note with the report path and which criteria now pass.",
+      "suggestedRole": "copywriter",
+      "advanceWhen": {
+        "file": "report.md",
+        "minBytes": 1,
+        "sniff": "nonempty"
+      },
+      "gate": {
+        "at": "completion",
+        "checks": [
+          {
+            "kind": "minBytes",
+            "file": "report.md",
+            "bytes": 1500
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "contains",
+            "file": "report.md",
+            "pattern": "(?:^|\\n)#{1,3}\\s+\\S",
+            "label": "markdown heading structure"
+          }
+        ],
+        "onReject": "write",
+        "maxAttempts": 4
+      },
+      "next": "produce"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "produce",
+      "name": "Produce the Word document",
+      "description": "Validate, convert, preview, and save report.docx (and report.pdf when requested) via DocBlocks.",
+      "prompt": "Turn report.md into the saved deliverable using the DocBlocks tools (pre-authorized for this task):\n\n1. `read_file` report.md so you have the exact markdown.\n2. `validate_document` with source `{ \"kind\": \"markdown\", \"markdown\": <report.md content>, \"name\": \"report.md\" }` and target format `docx`; fix any structural findings in report.md first.\n3. `list_themes` and pick a restrained, document-appropriate theme; note your choice.\n4. `convert_document` ONCE with that source, your `themeId`, `title` set to the report title, and targets `[{ \"format\": \"docx\", \"title\": <title> }]` — add `{ \"format\": \"pdf\", \"pageSize\": \"letter\" }` in the SAME call if notes/scope.md says the user asked for a PDF.\n5. `preview_document` on the DOCX artifact URI and inspect the page images: title present, headings structured, tables intact, references list rendered.\n6. `list_roots` to find the writable artifacts root, then `save_artifact` the DOCX to `report.docx` with `ifExists: \"error\"` (and the PDF to `report.pdf`). If it errors because the file exists from a previous pass, re-save with `ifExists: \"replace\"` and the `expectedSha256` from the earlier result.\n7. Call write_task_note with the theme, page count, and saved path(s).\n\nDo NOT hand-assemble any document XML — the deliverable is the .docx produced by convert_document.",
+      "suggestedRole": "developer",
+      "advanceWhen": {
+        "file": "report.docx",
+        "minBytes": 1,
+        "artifact": true
+      },
+      "gate": {
+        "at": "completion",
+        "checks": [
+          {
+            "kind": "minBytes",
+            "file": "report.docx",
+            "bytes": 5000,
+            "artifact": true
+          }
+        ],
+        "onReject": "produce",
+        "maxAttempts": 3
+      },
+      "next": "evaluate"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "evaluate",
+      "name": "Evaluate",
+      "description": "Grade the saved document against every acceptance criterion. All pass -> finish; any fail -> loop back to the owning step.",
+      "prompt": "Open notes/scope.md and grade against EACH acceptance criterion, writing PASS/FAIL per criterion: (1) every sub-question has a dedicated section; (2) every factual claim carries an inline [n] that resolves to a References entry — spot-check 3 citations against notes/sources.md to confirm the claim matches the logged fact; (3) the minimum source count and authority/recency bar are met; (4) a limitations section exists; (5) the executive summary is <=150 words and states the bottom line; (6) `preview_document` on the saved report.docx (source `{ \"kind\": \"file\", \"rootId\": <artifacts root from list_roots>, \"path\": \"report.docx\", \"format\": null }`) shows a clean document — title, heading structure, intact tables, rendered references. A report that reads well but invents or mismatches a citation FAILS.\n\nThen route — this is the whole point of the loop:\n\n- **Every criterion PASSES ->** call `advance_task_step({ ref, stepId: \"evaluate\", next: \"finish\" })`.\n- **Prose or citations fail ->** write the specific gaps to notes, then `advance_task_step({ ref, stepId: \"evaluate\", next: \"write\" })`.\n- **Only the conversion/save fails ->** `advance_task_step({ ref, stepId: \"evaluate\", next: \"produce\" })`.\n\nNever route to `finish` while any criterion is unmet. After ~3 unproductive loops, stop and report DONE_WITH_CONCERNS so the user can step in.",
+      "suggestedRole": "reviewer",
+      "next": "write"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "finish",
+      "name": "Finish",
+      "description": "All acceptance criteria met. Stamp a short summary and report DONE.",
+      "prompt": "Every acceptance criterion passed. Write a one-paragraph DONE summary to task notes via `write_task_note`: the question answered, the bottom-line finding, the source count, and that the deliverable is report.docx (plus report.pdf when produced) in the project artifacts. Then report DONE.",
+      "suggestedRole": "developer",
+      "terminal": true
+    }
+  ],
+  "version": "1.1.0",
+  "releasedAt": "2026-07-28T00:00:00Z"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/research-to-document/versions/1.1.0/test.json

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "title": "Research to Word Document smoke eval",
+  "objective": "Self-contained smoke eval for the Research to Word Document craftbook using the html-page generic harness.",
+  "tags": [
+    "html-page"
+  ],
+  "prompt": "Can you biuld us a little page for this? The content notes are in source/page-content.md. Save it as index.html — one file, nothing fancy needed on our end.",
+  "setup": {
+    "projectName": "Research to Word Document Eval",
+    "about": "Self-contained eval project for research-to-document. Seeded inputs are under workspace/source or workspace/fixtures; final deliverable is workspace/index.html.",
+    "missionObjectives": "Use the Research to Word Document craftbook/template, read the seeded local fixtures, and write index.html without network calls, real credentials, or live services.",
+    "files": [
+      {
+        "path": "source/brief.md",
+        "content": "# Research to Word Document Eval Brief\n\nClient: Boreal Desk, a home-office accessories company.\nAudience: operations leads who need an artifact they can use this week.\n\nFixed source facts for grounding:\n- The returns desk pilot covered 18 SKUs.\n- Median first response improved from 18 hours to 6 hours.\n- Preventable refund leakage fell from 14.2% to 8.9%.\n- The top unresolved complaint is status silence after photo submission.\n- Required next actions are automated status emails, barcode-exception training, and a weekly Finance exception export.\n\nUse these facts when the task asks for prose, analysis, copy, UI content, or test data. Do not use live web services, real credentials, or current outside data.\n\nCraftbook under test: research-to-document - Research to Word Document.\n"
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "source/page-content.md",
+        "content": "# Boreal Desk Support Board\n\nBuild content around a support operations board. Required labels: Open issues, Status silence, Response time, Refund leakage, Next action. Required metric text: 18 hours to 6 hours and 14.2% to 8.9%.\n"
+      }
+    ],
+    "worker": {
+      "name": "Jules",
+      "role": "Developer"
+    }
+  },
+  "mocks": [],
+  "success": {
+    "summary": "index.html is a source-grounded self-contained HTML page/tool.",
+    "deliverables": [
+      {
+        "path": "index.html",
+        "kind": "html-page",
+        "minBytes": 3000,
+        "checks": [
+          {
+            "kind": "cssMinBytes",
+            "bytes": 650,
+            "file": "index.html"
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "jsParses",
+            "file": "index.html"
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "contains",
+            "file": "index.html",
+            "pattern": "Boreal|Support Board|returns",
+            "flags": "i"
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "contains",
+            "file": "index.html",
+            "pattern": "18\\s*hours|6\\s*hours|14\\.2%|8\\.9%",
+            "flags": "i"
+          },
+          {
+            "kind": "contains",
+            "file": "index.html",
+            "pattern": "button|input|filter|tab|card|section|nav",
+            "flags": "i"
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "rubric": {
+    "artifact": {
+      "path": "index.html",
+      "kind": "html"
+    },
+    "axes": [
+      {
+        "name": "structure",
+        "description": "Layout and hierarchy fit the content; sections are scannable and coherent."
+      },
+      {
+        "name": "grounding",
+        "description": "Seeded source content is used faithfully — no invented facts or dropped requirements."
+      },
+      {
+        "name": "interactivity",
+        "description": "Controls and states the page claims to offer actually work."
+      },
+      {
+        "name": "polish",
+        "description": "Styling is intentional and responsive rather than unstyled or broken."
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "qualityFocus": [
+    "self-contained UI",
+    "source grounding",
+    "responsive structure"
+  ]
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/rest-api/art.json

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 1,
+  "promptVersion": "workshop-mark-1910-v2",
+  "periodCue": "circa-1910-subtle",
+  "family": "build-code",
+  "accents": [
+    "muted indigo",
+    "terracotta",
+    "sage"
+  ],
+  "sourceSummary": "Build a RESTful HTTP API service with resource endpoints, JSON request/response bodies, status codes, validation, and error handling.",
+  "styleReference": "accessibility-audit-1910"
+}

package/data/craftbook-templates/re/rest-api/manifest.json

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   "maintainer": {
     "name": "Gezel"
   },
+  "logo": "logo.webp",
   "license": "MIT",
   "yankedVersions": [],
   "workflow": "build-loop"