@bastani/atomic 0.7.17-1 → 0.8.0-0

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/overdrive.md

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+Start your response with:
+
+```
+──────────── ⚡ OVERDRIVE ─────────────
+》》》 Entering overdrive mode...
+```
+
+Push an interface past conventional limits. This isn't just about visual effects. It's about using the full power of the browser to make any part of an interface feel extraordinary: a table that handles a million rows, a dialog that morphs from its trigger, a form that validates in real-time with streaming feedback, a page transition that feels cinematic.
+
+**EXTRA IMPORTANT FOR THIS COMMAND**: Context determines what "extraordinary" means. A particle system on a creative portfolio is impressive. The same particle system on a settings page is embarrassing. But a settings page with instant optimistic saves and animated state transitions? That's extraordinary too. Understand the project's personality and goals before deciding what's appropriate.
+
+### Propose Before Building
+
+This command has the highest potential to misfire. Do NOT jump straight into implementation. You MUST:
+
+1. **Think through 2-3 different directions**: consider different techniques, levels of ambition, and aesthetic approaches. For each direction, briefly describe what the result would look and feel like.
+2. **STOP and call the AskUserQuestion tool to clarify.** to present these directions and get the user's pick before writing any code. Explain trade-offs (browser support, performance cost, complexity).
+3. Only proceed with the direction the user confirms.
+
+Skipping this step risks building something embarrassing that needs to be thrown away.
+
+### Iterate with Browser Automation
+
+Technically ambitious effects almost never work on the first try. You MUST actively use browser automation tools to preview your work, visually verify the result, and iterate. Do not assume the effect looks right, check it. Expect multiple rounds of refinement. The gap between "technically works" and "looks extraordinary" is closed through visual iteration, not code alone.
+
+---
+
+## Assess What "Extraordinary" Means Here
+
+The right kind of technical ambition depends entirely on what you're working with. Before choosing a technique, ask: **what would make a user of THIS specific interface say "wow, that's nice"?**
+
+### For visual/marketing surfaces
+Pages, hero sections, landing pages, portfolios: the "wow" is often sensory: a scroll-driven reveal, a shader background, a cinematic page transition, generative art that responds to the cursor.
+
+### For functional UI
+Tables, forms, dialogs, navigation: the "wow" is in how it FEELS: a dialog that morphs from the button that triggered it via View Transitions, a data table that renders 100k rows at 60fps via virtual scrolling, a form with streaming validation that feels instant, drag-and-drop with spring physics.
+
+### For performance-critical UI
+The "wow" is invisible but felt: a search that filters 50k items without a flicker, a complex form that never blocks the main thread, an image editor that processes in near-real-time. The interface just never hesitates.
+
+### For data-heavy interfaces
+Charts and dashboards: the "wow" is in fluidity: GPU-accelerated rendering via Canvas/WebGL for massive datasets, animated transitions between data states, force-directed graph layouts that settle naturally.
+
+**The common thread**: something about the implementation goes beyond what users expect from a web interface. The technique serves the experience, not the other way around.
+
+## The Toolkit
+
+Organized by what you're trying to achieve, not by technology name.
+
+### Make transitions feel cinematic
+- **View Transitions API** (same-document: all browsers; cross-document: no Firefox): shared element morphing between states. A list item expanding into a detail page. A button morphing into a dialog. This is the closest thing to native FLIP animations.
+- **`@starting-style`** (all browsers): animate elements from `display: none` to visible with CSS only, including entry keyframes
+- **Spring physics**: natural motion with mass, tension, and damping instead of cubic-bezier. Libraries: motion (formerly Framer Motion), GSAP, or roll your own spring solver.
+
+### Tie animation to scroll position
+- **Scroll-driven animations** (`animation-timeline: scroll()`): CSS-only, no JS. Parallax, progress bars, reveal sequences all driven by scroll position. (Chrome/Edge/Safari; Firefox: flag only; always provide a static fallback)
+
+### Render beyond CSS
+- **WebGL** (all browsers): shader effects, post-processing, particle systems. Libraries: Three.js, OGL (lightweight), regl. Use for effects CSS can't express.
+- **WebGPU** (Chrome/Edge; Safari partial; Firefox: flag only): next-gen GPU compute. More powerful than WebGL but limited browser support. Always fall back to WebGL2.
+- **Canvas 2D / OffscreenCanvas**: custom rendering, pixel manipulation, or moving heavy rendering off the main thread entirely via Web Workers + OffscreenCanvas.
+- **SVG filter chains**: displacement maps, turbulence, morphology for organic distortion effects. CSS-animatable.
+
+### Make data feel alive
+- **Virtual scrolling**: render only visible rows for tables/lists with tens of thousands of items. No library required for simple cases; TanStack Virtual for complex ones.
+- **GPU-accelerated charts**: Canvas or WebGL-rendered data visualization for datasets too large for SVG/DOM. Libraries: deck.gl, regl-based custom renderers.
+- **Animated data transitions**: morph between chart states rather than replacing. D3's `transition()` or View Transitions for DOM-based charts.
+
+### Animate complex properties
+- **`@property`** (all browsers): register custom CSS properties with types, enabling animation of gradients, colors, and complex values that CSS can't normally interpolate.
+- **Web Animations API** (all browsers): JavaScript-driven animations with the performance of CSS. Composable, cancellable, reversible. The foundation for complex choreography.
+
+### Push performance boundaries
+- **Web Workers**: move computation off the main thread. Heavy data processing, image manipulation, search indexing: anything that would cause jank.
+- **OffscreenCanvas**: render in a Worker thread. The main thread stays free while complex visuals render in the background.
+- **WASM**: near-native performance for computation-heavy features. Image processing, physics simulations, codecs.
+
+### Interact with the device
+- **Web Audio API**: spatial audio, audio-reactive visualizations, sonic feedback. Requires user gesture to start.
+- **Device APIs**: orientation, ambient light, geolocation. Use sparingly and always with user permission.
+
+**NOTE**: This command is about enhancing how an interface FEELS, not changing what a product DOES. Adding real-time collaboration, offline support, or new backend capabilities are product decisions, not UI enhancements. Focus on making existing features feel extraordinary.
+
+## Implement with Discipline
+
+### Progressive enhancement is non-negotiable
+
+Every technique must degrade gracefully. The experience without the enhancement must still be good.
+
+```css
+@supports (animation-timeline: scroll()) {
+  .hero { animation-timeline: scroll(); }
+}
+```
+
+```javascript
+if ('gpu' in navigator) { /* WebGPU */ }
+else if (canvas.getContext('webgl2')) { /* WebGL2 fallback */ }
+/* CSS-only fallback must still look good */
+```
+
+### Performance rules
+
+- Target 60fps. If dropping below 50, simplify.
+- Respect `prefers-reduced-motion`, always. Provide a beautiful static alternative.
+- Lazy-initialize heavy resources (WebGL contexts, WASM modules) only when near viewport.
+- Pause off-screen rendering. Kill what you can't see.
+- Test on real mid-range devices, not just your development machine.
+
+### Polish is the difference
+
+The gap between "cool" and "extraordinary" is in the last 20% of refinement: the easing curve on a spring animation, the timing offset in a staggered reveal, the subtle secondary motion that makes a transition feel physical. Don't ship the first version that works; ship the version that feels inevitable.
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Ignore `prefers-reduced-motion`. This is an accessibility requirement, not a suggestion
+- Ship effects that cause jank on mid-range devices
+- Use bleeding-edge APIs without a functional fallback
+- Add sound without explicit user opt-in
+- Use technical ambition to mask weak design fundamentals; fix those first with other commands
+- Layer multiple competing extraordinary moments. Focus creates impact, excess creates noise
+
+## Verify the Result
+
+- **The wow test**: Show it to someone who hasn't seen it. Do they react?
+- **The removal test**: Take it away. Does the experience feel diminished, or does nobody notice?
+- **The device test**: Run it on a phone, a tablet, a Chromebook. Still smooth?
+- **The accessibility test**: Enable reduced motion. Still beautiful?
+- **The context test**: Does this make sense for THIS brand and audience?
+
+"Technically extraordinary" isn't about using the newest API. It's about making an interface do something users didn't think a website could do.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/personas.md

@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+# Persona-Based Design Testing
+
+Test the interface through the eyes of 5 distinct user archetypes. Each persona exposes different failure modes that a single "design director" perspective would miss.
+
+**How to use**: Select 2–3 personas most relevant to the interface being critiqued. Walk through the primary user action as each persona. Report specific red flags, not generic concerns.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Impatient Power User: "Alex"
+
+
+**Profile**: Expert with similar products. Expects efficiency, hates hand-holding. Will find shortcuts or leave.
+
+**Behaviors**:
+- Skips all onboarding and instructions
+- Looks for keyboard shortcuts immediately
+- Tries to bulk-select, batch-edit, and automate
+- Gets frustrated by required steps that feel unnecessary
+- Abandons if anything feels slow or patronizing
+
+**Test Questions**:
+- Can Alex complete the core task in under 60 seconds?
+- Are there keyboard shortcuts for common actions?
+- Can onboarding be skipped entirely?
+- Do modals have keyboard dismiss (Esc)?
+- Is there a "power user" path (shortcuts, bulk actions)?
+
+**Red Flags** (report these specifically):
+- Forced tutorials or unskippable onboarding
+- No keyboard navigation for primary actions
+- Slow animations that can't be skipped
+- One-item-at-a-time workflows where batch would be natural
+- Redundant confirmation steps for low-risk actions
+
+---
+
+## 2. Confused First-Timer: "Jordan"
+
+**Profile**: Never used this type of product. Needs guidance at every step. Will abandon rather than figure it out.
+
+**Behaviors**:
+- Reads all instructions carefully
+- Hesitates before clicking anything unfamiliar
+- Looks for help or support constantly
+- Misunderstands jargon and abbreviations
+- Takes the most literal interpretation of any label
+
+**Test Questions**:
+- Is the first action obviously clear within 5 seconds?
+- Are all icons labeled with text?
+- Is there contextual help at decision points?
+- Does terminology assume prior knowledge?
+- Is there a clear "back" or "undo" at every step?
+
+**Red Flags** (report these specifically):
+- Icon-only navigation with no labels
+- Technical jargon without explanation
+- No visible help option or guidance
+- Ambiguous next steps after completing an action
+- No confirmation that an action succeeded
+
+---
+
+## 3. Accessibility-Dependent User: "Sam"
+
+**Profile**: Uses screen reader (VoiceOver/NVDA), keyboard-only navigation. May have low vision, motor impairment, or cognitive differences.
+
+**Behaviors**:
+- Tabs through the interface linearly
+- Relies on ARIA labels and heading structure
+- Cannot see hover states or visual-only indicators
+- Needs adequate color contrast (4.5:1 minimum)
+- May use browser zoom up to 200%
+
+**Test Questions**:
+- Can the entire primary flow be completed keyboard-only?
+- Are all interactive elements focusable with visible focus indicators?
+- Do images have meaningful alt text?
+- Is color contrast WCAG AA compliant (4.5:1 for text)?
+- Does the screen reader announce state changes (loading, success, errors)?
+
+**Red Flags** (report these specifically):
+- Click-only interactions with no keyboard alternative
+- Missing or invisible focus indicators
+- Meaning conveyed by color alone (red = error, green = success)
+- Unlabeled form fields or buttons
+- Time-limited actions without extension option
+- Custom components that break screen reader flow
+
+---
+
+## 4. Deliberate Stress Tester: "Riley"
+
+**Profile**: Methodical user who pushes interfaces beyond the happy path. Tests edge cases, tries unexpected inputs, and probes for gaps in the experience.
+
+**Behaviors**:
+- Tests edge cases intentionally (empty states, long strings, special characters)
+- Submits forms with unexpected data (emoji, RTL text, very long values)
+- Tries to break workflows by navigating backwards, refreshing mid-flow, or opening in multiple tabs
+- Looks for inconsistencies between what the UI promises and what actually happens
+- Documents problems methodically
+
+**Test Questions**:
+- What happens at the edges (0 items, 1000 items, very long text)?
+- Do error states recover gracefully or leave the UI in a broken state?
+- What happens on refresh mid-workflow? Is state preserved?
+- Are there features that appear to work but produce broken results?
+- How does the UI handle unexpected input (emoji, special chars, paste from Excel)?
+
+**Red Flags** (report these specifically):
+- Features that appear to work but silently fail or produce wrong results
+- Error handling that exposes technical details or leaves UI in a broken state
+- Empty states that show nothing useful ("No results" with no guidance)
+- Workflows that lose user data on refresh or navigation
+- Inconsistent behavior between similar interactions in different parts of the UI
+
+---
+
+## 5. Distracted Mobile User: "Casey"
+
+**Profile**: Using phone one-handed on the go. Frequently interrupted. Possibly on a slow connection.
+
+**Behaviors**:
+- Uses thumb only; prefers bottom-of-screen actions
+- Gets interrupted mid-flow and returns later
+- Switches between apps frequently
+- Has limited attention span and low patience
+- Types as little as possible, prefers taps and selections
+
+**Test Questions**:
+- Are primary actions in the thumb zone (bottom half of screen)?
+- Is state preserved if the user leaves and returns?
+- Does it work on slow connections (3G)?
+- Can forms use autocomplete and smart defaults?
+- Are touch targets at least 44×44pt?
+
+**Red Flags** (report these specifically):
+- Important actions positioned at the top of the screen (unreachable by thumb)
+- No state persistence; progress lost on tab switch or interruption
+- Large text inputs required where selection would work
+- Heavy assets loading on every page (no lazy loading)
+- Tiny tap targets or targets too close together
+
+---
+
+## Selecting Personas
+
+Choose personas based on the interface type:
+
+| Interface Type | Primary Personas | Why |
+|---------------|-----------------|-----|
+| Landing page / marketing | Jordan, Riley, Casey | First impressions, trust, mobile |
+| Dashboard / admin | Alex, Sam | Power users, accessibility |
+| E-commerce / checkout | Casey, Riley, Jordan | Mobile, edge cases, clarity |
+| Onboarding flow | Jordan, Casey | Confusion, interruption |
+| Data-heavy / analytics | Alex, Sam | Efficiency, keyboard nav |
+| Form-heavy / wizard | Jordan, Sam, Casey | Clarity, accessibility, mobile |
+
+---
+
+## Project-Specific Personas
+
+If `CLAUDE.md` contains a `## Design Context` section (generated by `impeccable teach`), derive 1–2 additional personas from the audience and brand information:
+
+1. Read the target audience description
+2. Identify the primary user archetype not covered by the 5 predefined personas
+3. Create a persona following this template:
+
+```
+### [Role]: "[Name]"
+
+**Profile**: [2-3 key characteristics derived from Design Context]
+
+**Behaviors**: [3-4 specific behaviors based on the described audience]
+
+**Red Flags**: [3-4 things that would alienate this specific user type]
+```
+
+Only generate project-specific personas when real Design Context data is available. Don't invent audience details; use the 5 predefined personas when no context exists.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/polish.md

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+> **Additional context needed**: quality bar (MVP vs flagship).
+
+Perform a meticulous final pass to catch all the small details that separate good work from great work. The difference between shipped and polished.
+
+Detector and automated QA output are defect evidence only. A clean script result is never proof that the design is strong; gather browser evidence and inspect the real interaction path.
+
+## Design System Discovery
+
+Aligning the feature to the design system is **not optional**. Polish without alignment is decoration on top of drift, and it makes the next person's job harder. Discovery comes before any other polish work.
+
+1. **Find the design system**: Search for design system documentation, component libraries, style guides, or token definitions. Study the core patterns: design principles, target audience, color tokens, spacing scale, typography styles, component API, motion conventions.
+2. **Note the conventions**: How are shared components imported? What spacing scale is used? Which colors come from tokens vs hard-coded values? What motion and interaction patterns are established? What flow shapes are used for comparable actions (modal vs full-page, inline vs route, save-on-blur vs explicit submit)?
+3. **Identify drift, then name the root cause**: For every deviation, classify it as a **missing token** (the value should exist in the system but doesn't), a **one-off implementation** (a shared component already exists but wasn't used), or a **conceptual misalignment** (the feature's flow, IA, or hierarchy doesn't match neighboring features). The fix differs by category: patch the value, swap to the shared component, or rework the flow. Fixing the symptom without naming the cause is how drift compounds.
+
+If a design system exists, polish **must** align the feature with it. If none exists, polish against the conventions visible in the codebase. **If anything about the system is ambiguous, ask. Never guess at design system principles.**
+
+## Pre-Polish Assessment
+
+Understand the current state and goals before touching anything:
+
+1. **Review completeness**:
+   - Is it functionally complete?
+   - Are there known issues to preserve (mark with TODOs)?
+   - What's the quality bar? (MVP vs flagship feature?)
+   - When does it ship? (How much time for polish?)
+
+2. **Think experience-first**: Who actually uses this, and what's the best possible experience for them? Effective design beats decorative polish; a feature that looks beautiful but fights the user's flow is not polished. Walk the path from their perspective before opening DevTools.
+
+3. **Identify polish areas**:
+   - Visual inconsistencies
+   - Spacing and alignment issues
+   - Interaction state gaps
+   - Copy inconsistencies
+   - Edge cases and error states
+   - Loading and transition smoothness
+   - Information architecture and flow drift (does this feature reveal complexity the way neighboring features do?)
+
+4. **Pull in any prior critique** (optional signal): If `/impeccable critique` has been run on the same target, its priority issues are a useful prior for what to address first. Resolve the target to a file path or URL, then:
+   ```bash
+   slug=$(node .claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/critique-storage.mjs slug "<resolved>")
+   node .claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/critique-storage.mjs latest "$slug"
+   ```
+   Exit 0 with body = found; fold the P0/P1 items into your polish list and mention the snapshot path so the user sees what you read. Exit 2 = no snapshot, continue without it. The critique is one input among many. Do your own pass either way.
+
+5. **Triage cosmetic vs functional**: Classify each issue as **cosmetic** (looks off, doesn't impede the user) or **functional** (breaks, blocks, or confuses the experience). When polish time is tight, functional issues ship first; cosmetic ones can land in a follow-up. Quality should be consistent; never perfect one corner while leaving another rough.
+
+**CRITICAL**: Polish is the last step, not the first. Don't polish work that's not functionally complete.
+
+## Polish Systematically
+
+Work through these dimensions methodically:
+
+### Visual Alignment & Spacing
+
+- **Pixel-perfect alignment**: Everything lines up to grid
+- **Consistent spacing**: All gaps use spacing scale (no random 13px gaps)
+- **Optical alignment**: Adjust for visual weight (icons may need offset for optical centering)
+- **Responsive consistency**: Spacing and alignment work at all breakpoints
+- **Grid adherence**: Elements snap to baseline grid
+
+**Check**:
+- Enable grid overlay and verify alignment
+- Check spacing with browser inspector
+- Test at multiple viewport sizes
+- Look for elements that "feel" off
+
+### Information Architecture & Flow
+
+Visual polish on a misshapen flow is wasted work. Match the *shape* of the experience to the system, not just the surface.
+
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Match how much is revealed when, compared to neighboring features. A settings page exposing 40 fields when the rest of the app reveals 5 at a time is drift, even if every field is perfectly styled.
+- **Established user flows**: Multi-step actions follow the same shape as comparable flows elsewhere: modal vs full-page, inline edit vs separate route, save-on-blur vs explicit submit, optimistic vs pessimistic updates.
+- **Hierarchy & complexity**: The same conceptual weight gets the same visual weight throughout. Primary actions don't become tertiary in one corner of the product, and tertiary actions don't shout.
+- **Empty, loading, and arrival transitions**: How content arrives, updates, and leaves matches how it does in adjacent features.
+- **Naming and mental model**: The feature uses the same nouns and verbs as the rest of the system. A "Workspace" here shouldn't be a "Project" three screens away.
+
+### Typography Refinement
+
+- **Hierarchy consistency**: Same elements use same sizes/weights throughout
+- **Line length**: 45-75 characters for body text
+- **Line height**: Appropriate for font size and context
+- **Widows & orphans**: No single words on last line
+- **Hyphenation**: Appropriate for language and column width
+- **Kerning**: Adjust letter spacing where needed (especially headlines)
+- **Font loading**: No FOUT/FOIT flashes
+
+### Color & Contrast
+
+- **Contrast ratios**: All text meets WCAG standards
+- **Consistent token usage**: No hard-coded colors, all use design tokens
+- **Theme consistency**: Works in all theme variants
+- **Color meaning**: Same colors mean same things throughout
+- **Accessible focus**: Focus indicators visible with sufficient contrast
+- **Tinted neutrals**: No pure gray or pure black; add subtle color tint (0.01 chroma)
+- **Gray on color**: Never put gray text on colored backgrounds; use a shade of that color or transparency
+
+### Interaction States
+
+Every interactive element needs all states:
+
+- **Default**: Resting state
+- **Hover**: Subtle feedback (color, scale, shadow)
+- **Focus**: Keyboard focus indicator (never remove without replacement)
+- **Active**: Click/tap feedback
+- **Disabled**: Clearly non-interactive
+- **Loading**: Async action feedback
+- **Error**: Validation or error state
+- **Success**: Successful completion
+
+**Missing states create confusion and broken experiences**.
+
+### Micro-interactions & Transitions
+
+- **Smooth transitions**: All state changes animated appropriately (150-300ms)
+- **Consistent easing**: Use ease-out-quart/quint/expo for natural deceleration. Never bounce or elastic; they feel dated.
+- **No jank**: Smooth animations; use atmospheric blur/filter/mask/shadow effects when they add polish, but bound expensive paint areas and avoid casual layout-property animation
+- **Appropriate motion**: Motion serves purpose, not decoration
+- **Reduced motion**: Respects `prefers-reduced-motion`
+
+### Content & Copy
+
+- **Consistent terminology**: Same things called same names throughout
+- **Consistent capitalization**: Title Case vs Sentence case applied consistently
+- **Grammar & spelling**: No typos
+- **Appropriate length**: Not too wordy, not too terse
+- **Punctuation consistency**: Periods on sentences, not on labels (unless all labels have them)
+
+### Icons & Images
+
+- **Consistent style**: All icons from same family or matching style
+- **Appropriate sizing**: Icons sized consistently for context
+- **Proper alignment**: Icons align with adjacent text optically
+- **Alt text**: All images have descriptive alt text
+- **Loading states**: Images don't cause layout shift, proper aspect ratios
+- **Retina support**: 2x assets for high-DPI screens
+
+### Forms & Inputs
+
+- **Label consistency**: All inputs properly labeled
+- **Required indicators**: Clear and consistent
+- **Error messages**: Helpful and consistent
+- **Tab order**: Logical keyboard navigation
+- **Auto-focus**: Appropriate (don't overuse)
+- **Validation timing**: Consistent (on blur vs on submit)
+
+### Edge Cases & Error States
+
+- **Loading states**: All async actions have loading feedback
+- **Empty states**: Helpful empty states, not just blank space
+- **Error states**: Clear error messages with recovery paths
+- **Success states**: Confirmation of successful actions
+- **Long content**: Handles very long names, descriptions, etc.
+- **No content**: Handles missing data gracefully
+- **Offline**: Appropriate offline handling (if applicable)
+
+### Responsiveness
+
+- **All breakpoints**: Test mobile, tablet, desktop
+- **Touch targets**: 44x44px minimum on touch devices
+- **Readable text**: No text smaller than 14px on mobile
+- **No horizontal scroll**: Content fits viewport
+- **Appropriate reflow**: Content adapts logically
+
+### Performance
+
+- **Fast initial load**: Optimize critical path
+- **No layout shift**: Elements don't jump after load (CLS)
+- **Smooth interactions**: No lag or jank
+- **Optimized images**: Appropriate formats and sizes
+- **Lazy loading**: Off-screen content loads lazily
+
+### Code Quality
+
+- **Remove console logs**: No debug logging in production
+- **Remove commented code**: Clean up dead code
+- **Remove unused imports**: Clean up unused dependencies
+- **Consistent naming**: Variables and functions follow conventions
+- **Type safety**: No TypeScript `any` or ignored errors
+- **Accessibility**: Proper ARIA labels and semantic HTML
+
+## Polish Checklist
+
+Go through systematically:
+
+- [ ] Aligned to the design system (drift named and resolved by root cause)
+- [ ] Information architecture and flow shape match neighboring features
+- [ ] Visual alignment perfect at all breakpoints
+- [ ] Spacing uses design tokens consistently
+- [ ] Typography hierarchy consistent
+- [ ] All interactive states implemented
+- [ ] All transitions smooth (60fps)
+- [ ] Copy is consistent and polished
+- [ ] Icons are consistent and properly sized
+- [ ] All forms properly labeled and validated
+- [ ] Error states are helpful
+- [ ] Loading states are clear
+- [ ] Empty states are welcoming
+- [ ] Touch targets are 44x44px minimum
+- [ ] Contrast ratios meet WCAG AA
+- [ ] Keyboard navigation works
+- [ ] Focus indicators visible
+- [ ] No console errors or warnings
+- [ ] No layout shift on load
+- [ ] Works in all supported browsers
+- [ ] Respects reduced motion preference
+- [ ] Code is clean (no TODOs, console.logs, commented code)
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Polish is about details. Zoom in. Squint at it. Use it yourself. The little things add up.
+
+Sweat the details. Zoom in until the alignment is right and the spacing reads as deliberate. Then ship.
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Polish before it's functionally complete
+- Polish without aligning to the design system; that's decoration on drift
+- Guess at design system principles instead of asking when something is ambiguous
+- Spend hours on polish if it ships in 30 minutes (triage)
+- Introduce bugs while polishing (test thoroughly)
+- Ignore systematic issues (if spacing is off everywhere, fix the system, not just one screen)
+- Perfect one thing while leaving others rough (consistent quality level)
+- Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist
+- Hard-code values that should use design tokens
+- Introduce new patterns or flows that diverge from established ones
+
+## Final Verification
+
+Before marking as done:
+
+- **Use it yourself**: Actually interact with the feature.
+- **Test on real devices**: Not just browser DevTools.
+- **Ask someone else to review**: Fresh eyes catch things.
+- **Compare to design**: Match intended design.
+- **Check all states**: Don't just test happy path.
+- **Treat automation carefully**: Run detector or QA commands when they are available and relevant, fix their defects, but never cite a clean result as proof that the work is polished.
+
+## Clean Up
+
+After polishing, ensure code quality:
+
+- **Replace custom implementations**: If the design system provides a component you reimplemented, switch to the shared version.
+- **Remove orphaned code**: Delete unused styles, components, or files made obsolete by polish.
+- **Consolidate tokens**: If you introduced new values, check whether they should be tokens.
+- **Verify DRYness**: Look for duplication introduced during polishing and consolidate.

package/dist/builtin/workflows/skills/impeccable/reference/product.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# Product register
+
+When design SERVES the product: app UIs, admin dashboards, settings panels, data tables, tools, authenticated surfaces, anything where the user is in a task.
+
+## The product slop test
+
+Not "would someone say AI made this." Familiarity is often a feature here. The test is: would a user fluent in the category's best tools (Linear, Figma, Notion, Raycast, Stripe come to mind) sit down and trust this interface, or pause at every subtly-off component?
+
+Product UI's failure mode isn't flatness, it's strangeness without purpose: over-decorated buttons, mismatched form controls, gratuitous motion, display fonts where labels should be, invented affordances for standard tasks. The bar is earned familiarity. The tool should disappear into the task.
+
+## Typography
+
+- **System fonts are legitimate.** `-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", system-ui, sans-serif` gives you native feel on every platform. Inter is the common cross-platform default for a reason.
+- **One family is often right.** Product UIs don't need display/body pairing. A well-tuned sans carries headings, buttons, labels, body, data.
+- **Fixed rem scale, not fluid.** Clamp-sized headings don't serve product UI. Users view at consistent DPI, and a fluid h1 that shrinks in a sidebar looks worse, not better.
+- **Tighter scale ratio.** 1.125–1.2 between steps is typical. More type elements here than on brand surfaces; exaggerated contrast creates noise.
+- **Line length still applies for prose** (65–75ch). Data and compact UI can run denser; tables at 120ch+ are fine.
+
+## Color
+
+Product defaults to Restrained. A single surface can earn Committed (a dashboard where one category color carries a report, an onboarding flow with a drenched welcome screen), but Restrained is the floor.
+
+- State-rich semantic vocabulary: hover, focus, active, disabled, selected, loading, error, warning, success, info. Standardize these.
+- Accent color used for primary actions, current selection, and state indicators only, not decoration.
+- A second neutral layer for sidebars, toolbars, and panels (slightly cooler or warmer than the content surface).
+
+## Layout
+
+- Predictable grids. Consistency IS an affordance; users navigate faster when the structure is expected.
+- Familiar patterns are features. Standard navigation (top bar, side nav), breadcrumbs, tabs, and form layouts have established user expectations. Don't reinvent for flavor.
+- Responsive behavior is structural (collapse sidebar, responsive table, breakpoint-driven columns), not fluid typography.
+
+## Components
+
+Every interactive component has: default, hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, error. Don't ship with half of these.
+
+- Skeleton states for loading, not spinners in the middle of content.
+- Empty states that teach the interface, not "nothing here."
+- Consistent affordances across the surface. Same button shape. Same form-control vocabulary. Same icon style.
+
+## Motion
+
+- 150–250 ms on most transitions. Users are in flow; don't make them wait for choreography.
+- Motion conveys state, not decoration. State change, feedback, loading, reveal: nothing else.
+- No orchestrated page-load sequences. Product loads into a task; users don't want to watch it load.
+
+## Product bans (on top of the shared absolute bans)
+
+- Decorative motion that doesn't convey state.
+- Inconsistent component vocabulary across screens. If the "save" button looks different in two places, one is wrong.
+- Display fonts in UI labels, buttons, data.
+- Reinventing standard affordances for flavor (custom scrollbars, weird form controls, non-standard modals).
+- Heavy color or full-saturation accents on inactive states.
+
+## Product permissions
+
+Product can afford things brand surfaces can't.
+
+- System fonts and familiar sans defaults (Inter, SF Pro, system-ui stacks).
+- Standard navigation patterns: top bar + side nav, breadcrumbs, tabs, command palettes.
+- Density. Tables with many rows, panels with many labels, dense information when users need it.
+- Consistency over surprise. The same visual vocabulary screen to screen is a virtue; delight is saved for moments, not pages.