@bananapus/distributor-v6 0.0.7 → 0.0.9
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +2 -2
- package/package.json +16 -7
- package/src/JB721Distributor.sol +46 -12
- package/src/JBDistributor.sol +59 -37
- package/src/JBTokenDistributor.sol +4 -0
- package/src/interfaces/IJBDistributor.sol +3 -1
- package/src/structs/JBTokenSnapshotData.sol +4 -2
- package/src/structs/JBVestingData.sol +6 -3
- package/.github/pull_request_template.md +0 -33
- package/.github/workflows/lint.yml +0 -19
- package/.github/workflows/publish.yml +0 -19
- package/.github/workflows/slither.yml +0 -23
- package/.github/workflows/test.yml +0 -28
- package/.gitmodules +0 -3
- package/ADMINISTRATION.md +0 -65
- package/ARCHITECTURE.md +0 -89
- package/AUDIT_INSTRUCTIONS.md +0 -52
- package/RISKS.md +0 -78
- package/SKILLS.md +0 -36
- package/USER_JOURNEYS.md +0 -122
- package/slither-ci.config.json +0 -10
- package/test/AuditFixes.t.sol +0 -429
- package/test/JB721Distributor.t.sol +0 -2059
- package/test/JBTokenDistributor.t.sol +0 -503
- package/test/audit/CodexNemesisAccountingPoC.t.sol +0 -344
- package/test/audit/CodexNemesisFreshSplitTokenMismatch.t.sol +0 -133
- package/test/audit/CodexNemesisFreshVerification.t.sol +0 -218
- package/test/audit/CodexNemesisPoC.t.sol +0 -191
- package/test/audit/H26VotingPowerCap.t.sol +0 -343
- package/test/audit/Pass12Fixes.t.sol +0 -344
- package/test/audit/PostSnapshotMintTheft.t.sol +0 -413
- package/test/audit/TokenMismatchFix.t.sol +0 -295
- package/test/fork/TokenDistributorFork.t.sol +0 -603
- package/test/invariant/JB721DistributorInvariant.t.sol +0 -414
package/ARCHITECTURE.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Architecture
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Purpose
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
`nana-distributor-v6` provides round-based vesting and claiming for already-owned assets. It supports both `IVotes`-based ERC-20 distributions and 721-based distributions without becoming a treasury or accounting layer.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## System Overview
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
`JBDistributor` is the shared vesting engine. `JBTokenDistributor` changes stake measurement to checkpointed voting power. `JB721Distributor` changes stake measurement to checkpointed voting power from the hook's `CHECKPOINTS()` module, ensuring only NFTs held at round start are eligible.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
Both variants can be used as `IJBSplitHook` receivers.
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## Core Invariants
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
- snapshot timing must stay coherent
|
|
16
|
-
- tracked funded balance must cover current vesting obligations
|
|
17
|
-
- claim authority must match the distributor type
|
|
18
|
-
- 721 forfeiture handling must not over-allocate or burn value accidentally
|
|
19
|
-
- token and 721 variants must preserve the same core vesting math
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
## Modules
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
| Module | Responsibility | Notes |
|
|
24
|
-
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
25
|
-
| `JBDistributor` | Shared rounds, vesting, snapshots, and claims | Economic core |
|
|
26
|
-
| `JBTokenDistributor` | ERC-20 distribution using `IVotes` checkpoints | Token stake source |
|
|
27
|
-
| `JB721Distributor` | NFT distribution using checkpointed voting power | 721 stake source |
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Trust Boundaries
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
- split-hook caller authentication depends on `JBDirectory`
|
|
32
|
-
- `JBTokenDistributor` trusts `IVotes` checkpoint history
|
|
33
|
-
- `JB721Distributor` trusts the 721 hook's `CHECKPOINTS()` module for historical voting power and the store for tier metadata
|
|
34
|
-
- upstream entitlement logic still lives outside this repo
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
## Critical Flows
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
### Begin Vesting
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
```text
|
|
41
|
-
funded distributor
|
|
42
|
-
-> begin a round
|
|
43
|
-
-> snapshot stake and tracked balance for that round
|
|
44
|
-
-> record vesting entries for the requested token IDs
|
|
45
|
-
```
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
### Collect
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
```text
|
|
50
|
-
claimant
|
|
51
|
-
-> prove authority for the token ID or encoded claimant slot
|
|
52
|
-
-> compute unlocked share
|
|
53
|
-
-> transfer the vested amount
|
|
54
|
-
```
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## Accounting Model
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
This repo owns vesting-round accounting. It does not own upstream treasury accounting or entitlement creation.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
The main variables are snapshot balance, total vesting amount, and the stake source used to split each round.
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
## Security Model
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
- wrong snapshots can misallocate a whole round
|
|
65
|
-
- bad constructor parameters can brick a distributor instance
|
|
66
|
-
- split-funding caller assumptions matter because `processSplitWith` distinguishes pull and pre-sent flows
|
|
67
|
-
- 721 and token variants intentionally differ in authority and forfeiture behavior
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
## Safe Change Guide
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
- review snapshot timing and vesting math together
|
|
72
|
-
- if claim authority changes, re-check both distributor variants separately
|
|
73
|
-
- if funding semantics change, test terminal-style and controller-style flows explicitly
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
## Canonical Checks
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
- token distribution behavior:
|
|
78
|
-
`test/JBTokenDistributor.t.sol`
|
|
79
|
-
- 721 distribution behavior:
|
|
80
|
-
`test/JB721Distributor.t.sol`
|
|
81
|
-
- 721 invariants:
|
|
82
|
-
`test/invariant/JB721DistributorInvariant.t.sol`
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
## Source Map
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
- `src/JBDistributor.sol`
|
|
87
|
-
- `src/JBTokenDistributor.sol`
|
|
88
|
-
- `src/JB721Distributor.sol`
|
|
89
|
-
- `src/interfaces/IJBDistributor.sol`
|
package/AUDIT_INSTRUCTIONS.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Audit Instructions
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This repo is a shared vesting engine plus two concrete distributor variants. Audit it as payout logic whose main risks are snapshot timing, stake measurement, and funding assumptions.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## Audit Objective
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
Find issues that:
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
- misallocate rewards because the snapshot or stake source is wrong
|
|
10
|
-
- break vesting or claiming because parameters are invalid
|
|
11
|
-
- let caller or claim authority drift from the intended model
|
|
12
|
-
- make split-funding assumptions unsafe
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Scope
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
In scope:
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
- `src/JBDistributor.sol`
|
|
19
|
-
- `src/JBTokenDistributor.sol`
|
|
20
|
-
- `src/JB721Distributor.sol`
|
|
21
|
-
- interfaces and structs under `src/`
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Start Here
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
1. `src/JBDistributor.sol`
|
|
26
|
-
2. `src/JBTokenDistributor.sol`
|
|
27
|
-
3. `src/JB721Distributor.sol`
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Security Model
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
The shared distributor:
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
- snapshots balance and stake for a round
|
|
34
|
-
- tracks vesting obligations
|
|
35
|
-
- lets authorized claimants collect what has unlocked
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
The concrete variants only change how stake and claimant authority are measured.
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
## Critical Invariants
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
1. Snapshot and stake source stay coherent.
|
|
42
|
-
A round should not allocate more or less than the chosen stake source supports.
|
|
43
|
-
2. Tracked balance covers vesting obligations.
|
|
44
|
-
Current and future vesting must reconcile with funded inventory.
|
|
45
|
-
3. Claim authority matches distributor type.
|
|
46
|
-
The token and 721 variants must enforce their distinct authority models correctly.
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## Verification
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
- `npm install`
|
|
51
|
-
- `forge build`
|
|
52
|
-
- `forge test`
|
package/RISKS.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Distributor Risk Register
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This file covers the shared vesting engine in `JBDistributor` and the two concrete payout-split receivers, `JB721Distributor` and `JBTokenDistributor`.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## How To Use This File
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
- Read `Priority risks` first. Those are the failure modes with the highest payout-integrity impact.
|
|
8
|
-
- Treat the shared `JBDistributor` logic as the economic core.
|
|
9
|
-
- Use `Invariants to verify` as the minimum test envelope before routing live splits through a distributor.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## Priority Risks
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
| Priority | Risk | Why it matters | Primary controls |
|
|
14
|
-
|----------|------|----------------|------------------|
|
|
15
|
-
| P0 | Wrong stake snapshot or stale stake source | A bad stake reading misallocates rewards for an entire round. | Snapshot review, invariants, and careful integration with the chosen hook or `IVotes` token. |
|
|
16
|
-
| P1 | Zero-stake or bad-parameter deployment | Bad constructor inputs or zero total stake can make core flows revert. | Deployment-time validation and operator runbooks. |
|
|
17
|
-
| P1 | Split funding trust mismatch | `processSplitWith` distinguishes terminal-style pull flows from controller-style pre-sent flows. | Restrict callers and test both paths. |
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## 1. Trust Assumptions
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
- **`JBDirectory` is trusted.**
|
|
22
|
-
- **Stake sources are trusted.**
|
|
23
|
-
- **Deployment parameters must be sane.**
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
## 2. Economic Risks
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
- **Round snapshot timing has a zero-balance edge case.**
|
|
28
|
-
- **Unclaimed value stays in the pool.**
|
|
29
|
-
- **Partial-round claims are linear, not cliff-based.**
|
|
30
|
-
- **Forfeited 721 rewards are recycled, not burned.**
|
|
31
|
-
- **Undelegated `IVotes` balances can dilute participation.**
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## 3. Access Control And Caller Risks
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
- **Vesting is permissionless.**
|
|
36
|
-
- **Claim authority differs by distributor type.**
|
|
37
|
-
- **721 claim batches are brittle to invalid token IDs.**
|
|
38
|
-
- **Forfeiture release is effectively 721-only.**
|
|
39
|
-
- **Split-hook entry is tightly gated.**
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## 4. DoS And Liveness Risks
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
- **Zero stake reverts vesting.**
|
|
44
|
-
- **Zero distributable balance reverts vesting.** The `beginVesting` call reverts with `JBDistributor_NothingToDistribute` if the distributable balance for a token is zero.
|
|
45
|
-
- **Bad constructor parameters can brick the instance.**
|
|
46
|
-
- **Resolver or token callback failures can block collection.**
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
## 5. Integration Risks
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
- **Controller-vs-terminal split funding heuristic matters.**
|
|
51
|
-
- **Fee-on-transfer handling uses balance-delta accounting.** Both terminal-pull and controller-pre-send paths measure `balanceAfter - balanceBefore` to credit the actual received amount.
|
|
52
|
-
- **721 stake weights depend on checkpointed voting power at round start.** The `CHECKPOINTS()` module must be deployed and delegates must be set before the round snapshot block, or stakers receive zero weight.
|
|
53
|
-
- **721 vesting and claiming treat burned tokens differently.**
|
|
54
|
-
- **Checkpoint availability matters for both `IVotes` token distributors and 721 distributors.**
|
|
55
|
-
- **Token distributor rejects token IDs with non-zero upper bits** (above 160) to prevent aliasing to the same staker address.
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
## 6. Invariants To Verify
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
- `totalVestingAmountOf <= _balanceOf`
|
|
60
|
-
- collections plus remaining vesting plus future distributable balance never exceed tracked funded balance
|
|
61
|
-
- non-zero round snapshots stay stable within a round
|
|
62
|
-
- `latestVestedIndexOf` advances contiguously
|
|
63
|
-
- burned NFTs are excluded from 721 stake (via zero checkpointed votes) and only recycled through the explicit forfeiture path
|
|
64
|
-
- only the encoded address can collect from the token distributor
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
## 7. Accepted Behaviors
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
### 7.1 Anyone can trigger a round snapshot
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
This improves liveness, but it also means operators do not fully control the exact block when a round is crystallized.
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
### 7.2 Rewards can remain undistributed when stake is missing
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
If some potential participants have zero effective stake for a round, the corresponding value stays in the distributor for future rounds.
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
### 7.3 721 and `IVotes` variants intentionally differ
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
They share the vesting engine but not the same ownership model.
|
package/SKILLS.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Juicebox Distributor
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Use This File For
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
- Use this file when the task involves round-based vesting, split-hook distribution, or snapshot-based payout allocation.
|
|
6
|
-
- Start here, then decide whether the issue is in shared vesting logic, `IVotes`-based stake measurement, or 721-based stake measurement.
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
## Read This Next
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
| If you need... | Open this next |
|
|
11
|
-
|---|---|
|
|
12
|
-
| Repo overview and architecture | [`README.md`](./README.md), [`ARCHITECTURE.md`](./ARCHITECTURE.md) |
|
|
13
|
-
| Shared vesting engine | [`src/JBDistributor.sol`](./src/JBDistributor.sol), [`src/interfaces/IJBDistributor.sol`](./src/interfaces/IJBDistributor.sol) |
|
|
14
|
-
| Token distributor behavior | [`src/JBTokenDistributor.sol`](./src/JBTokenDistributor.sol) |
|
|
15
|
-
| 721 distributor behavior | [`src/JB721Distributor.sol`](./src/JB721Distributor.sol) |
|
|
16
|
-
| Types and structs | [`src/structs/`](./src/structs/) |
|
|
17
|
-
| Main tests | [`test/JBTokenDistributor.t.sol`](./test/JBTokenDistributor.t.sol), [`test/JB721Distributor.t.sol`](./test/JB721Distributor.t.sol), [`test/invariant/JB721DistributorInvariant.t.sol`](./test/invariant/JB721DistributorInvariant.t.sol) |
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## Repo Map
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
| Area | Where to look |
|
|
22
|
-
|---|---|
|
|
23
|
-
| Main contracts | [`src/`](./src/) |
|
|
24
|
-
| Structs and interfaces | [`src/structs/`](./src/structs/), [`src/interfaces/`](./src/interfaces/) |
|
|
25
|
-
| Tests | [`test/`](./test/) |
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## Purpose
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
Shared vesting and distribution engine for ERC-20 and 721-based payout flows.
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Working Rules
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
- Start in [`src/JBDistributor.sol`](./src/JBDistributor.sol) for shared round logic.
|
|
34
|
-
- Treat snapshot timing as part of correctness.
|
|
35
|
-
- `JBTokenDistributor` and `JB721Distributor` share a vesting engine but not the same ownership model.
|
|
36
|
-
- Verify the distributor actually holds the asset it is meant to vest before reasoning about payout correctness.
|
package/USER_JOURNEYS.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,122 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# User Journeys
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Repo Purpose
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
This repo distributes already-owned assets over time. It snapshots stake, starts vesting rounds, and lets eligible recipients collect what has unlocked.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Primary Actors
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
- teams funding a distributor from a split or post-mint allocation
|
|
10
|
-
- token holders or NFT holders collecting vested rewards
|
|
11
|
-
- operators configuring round timing and deployment shape
|
|
12
|
-
- auditors reviewing snapshot timing and stake-accounting correctness
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Key Surfaces
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
- `JBDistributor`: shared round and vesting engine
|
|
17
|
-
- `JBTokenDistributor`: ERC-20 distributor using `IVotes`
|
|
18
|
-
- `JB721Distributor`: NFT distributor using tier voting units
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
## Journey 1: Fund A Distributor
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
**Actor:** project or payout flow.
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
**Intent:** move owned assets into a distributor that will vest them over time.
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
**Preconditions**
|
|
27
|
-
- the correct asset and distributor type are chosen
|
|
28
|
-
- the distributor actually receives the inventory it is expected to vest
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
**Main Flow**
|
|
31
|
-
1. Fund the distributor directly or through a payout split.
|
|
32
|
-
2. Confirm the tracked balance matches what the distributor received.
|
|
33
|
-
3. Use the distributor as the vesting surface, not as the source of entitlement logic.
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
**Failure Modes**
|
|
36
|
-
- wrong asset funded
|
|
37
|
-
- underfunded distributor
|
|
38
|
-
- caller assumes funding alone starts vesting
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
**Postconditions**
|
|
41
|
-
- the distributor holds the asset inventory for future rounds
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
## Journey 2: Start A Vesting Round
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
**Actor:** any caller.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
**Intent:** snapshot the current round and begin vesting.
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
**Preconditions**
|
|
50
|
-
- the round timing and parameters are valid
|
|
51
|
-
- the stake source is usable and non-zero
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
**Main Flow**
|
|
54
|
-
1. Call `beginVesting`.
|
|
55
|
-
2. The distributor snapshots the relevant balance and stake source.
|
|
56
|
-
3. Vesting entries become claimable over the configured schedule.
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
**Snapshot timing:** The snapshot for each round is taken when the previous round first sees activity (`poke`, `beginVesting`, or `collectVestedRewards`). To be included in round N's distribution, make sure your tokens are held and delegated before anyone interacts with round N-1. In practice, keep your delegation current — if it is set before the previous round's activity begins, your voting power will be counted for the next round.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
**Failure Modes**
|
|
61
|
-
- zero total stake
|
|
62
|
-
- bad deployment parameters such as zero round duration or zero vesting rounds
|
|
63
|
-
- stake snapshot is stale or surprising to operators
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
**Postconditions**
|
|
66
|
-
- a new vesting round exists with fixed snapshot assumptions
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
## Journey 3: Collect Vested Rewards
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
**Actor:** eligible recipient.
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
**Intent:** collect the share that has unlocked for a round.
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
**Preconditions**
|
|
75
|
-
- the recipient is authorized under the distributor type
|
|
76
|
-
- some share has already vested
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
**Main Flow**
|
|
79
|
-
1. Call the relevant claim function.
|
|
80
|
-
2. The distributor checks authority and unlocked amount.
|
|
81
|
-
3. The vested share transfers to the claimant.
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
**Failure Modes**
|
|
84
|
-
- invalid claimant
|
|
85
|
-
- claim batch includes invalid 721 token IDs
|
|
86
|
-
- reward token transfer fails
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
**Postconditions**
|
|
89
|
-
- vested rewards move to the claimant
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
## Journey 4: Recycle Forfeited 721 Rewards
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
**Actor:** caller using the 721 distributor path.
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
**Intent:** release rewards tied to burned NFTs back into the future distribution pool.
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
**Preconditions**
|
|
98
|
-
- the distributor type is 721-based
|
|
99
|
-
- the relevant NFTs are burned or otherwise forfeited under the configured rules
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
**Main Flow**
|
|
102
|
-
1. Call the forfeiture-release path.
|
|
103
|
-
2. The distributor reduces current vesting obligations for those forfeited claims.
|
|
104
|
-
3. The value remains in the distributor for future rounds instead of being destroyed.
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
**Failure Modes**
|
|
107
|
-
- caller expects the same behavior from the token distributor
|
|
108
|
-
- off-chain systems treat forfeited value as burned instead of recycled
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
**Postconditions**
|
|
111
|
-
- forfeited 721 rewards return to the future distributable pool
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
## Trust Boundaries
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
- this repo trusts `JBDirectory` for authenticated split-hook caller checks
|
|
116
|
-
- `JBTokenDistributor` trusts `IVotes` checkpoints
|
|
117
|
-
- `JB721Distributor` trusts the 721 hook's `CHECKPOINTS()` module for historical voting power and the store for tier metadata
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
## Hand-Offs
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
- Use the upstream repo that funded the distributor when the question is about why an allocation exists.
|
|
122
|
-
- Use [nana-721-hook-v6](../nana-721-hook-v6/USER_JOURNEYS.md) when the stake source is a tiered 721 hook.
|
package/slither-ci.config.json
DELETED
|
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
{
|
|
2
|
-
"detectors_to_exclude": "timestamp,uninitialized-local,naming-convention,solc-version,shadowing-local",
|
|
3
|
-
"exclude_informational": true,
|
|
4
|
-
"exclude_low": false,
|
|
5
|
-
"exclude_medium": false,
|
|
6
|
-
"exclude_high": false,
|
|
7
|
-
"disable_color": false,
|
|
8
|
-
"filter_paths": "(mocks/|test/|node_modules/|lib/)",
|
|
9
|
-
"legacy_ast": false
|
|
10
|
-
}
|