@balena/pinejs 23.2.4-build-reduce-constrained-model-memory-5e8ead9a40f747e919256428c19029403824bbac-2 → 23.2.4

package/src/sbvr-api/permissions.ts

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import type {
 	Relationship,
 	RelationshipInternalNode,
 	RelationshipLeafNode,
+	RelationshipMapping,
 	SelectNode,
 	SelectQueryNode,
 } from '@balena/abstract-sql-compiler';
@@ -768,183 +769,175 @@ const getAlias = (name: string) => {
 	return `permissions${permissionsJSON}`;
 };
 
-const rewriteRelationship = (
-	value: Relationship,
-	name: string,
-	abstractSqlModel: AbstractSqlModel,
-	permissionsLookup: PermissionLookup,
-	vocabulary: string,
-	odata2AbstractSQL: OData2AbstractSQL,
-) => {
-	let escapedName = sqlNameToODataName(name);
-	if (abstractSqlModel.tables[name]) {
-		escapedName = sqlNameToODataName(abstractSqlModel.tables[name].name);
-	}
-
-	const rewrite = (object: Relationship) => {
-		let ret = object;
-		if ('$' in ret && Array.isArray(ret.$)) {
-			// object is in the form of
-			// { "$": ["actor", ["actor", "id"]] } or { "$": ["device type"] }
-			// we are only interested in the first case, since this is a relationship
-			// to a different resource
-			const mapping = ret.$;
-			if (
-				mapping.length === 2 &&
-				Array.isArray(mapping[1]) &&
-				mapping[1].length === 2 &&
-				typeof mapping[1][0] === 'string'
-			) {
-				// now have ensured that mapping looks like ["actor", ["actor", "id"]]
-				// this relations ship means that:
-				//   mapping[0] is the local field
-				//   mapping[1] is the reference to the other resource, that joins this resource
-				//   mapping[1][0] is the name of the other resource (actor in the example)
-				//   mapping[1][1] is the name of the field on the other resource
-				//
-				// this therefore defines that the local field `actor` needs
-				// to match the `id` of the `actor` resources for the join
-
-				const possibleTargetResourceName = mapping[1][0];
-
-				// Skip this if we already shortcut this connection
-				if (possibleTargetResourceName.endsWith('$bypass')) {
-					return;
-				}
-
-				const targetResourceEscaped = sqlNameToODataName(
-					abstractSqlModel.tables[possibleTargetResourceName]?.name ??
-						possibleTargetResourceName,
-				);
-
-				// This is either a translated or bypassed resource we don't
-				// mess with these
-				if (targetResourceEscaped.includes('$')) {
-					return;
-				}
-
-				let foundCanAccessLink = false;
+const rewriteRelationship = memoizeWeak(
+	(
+		value: Relationship,
+		name: string,
+		abstractSqlModel: AbstractSqlModel,
+		permissionsLookup: PermissionLookup,
+		vocabulary: string,
+		odata2AbstractSQL: OData2AbstractSQL,
+	) => {
+		let escapedName = sqlNameToODataName(name);
+		if (abstractSqlModel.tables[name]) {
+			escapedName = sqlNameToODataName(abstractSqlModel.tables[name].name);
+		}
 
-				try {
-					const odata = memoizedParseOdata(`/${targetResourceEscaped}`);
+		const rewrite = (object: Relationship | RelationshipMapping) => {
+			if ('$' in object && Array.isArray(object.$)) {
+				// object is in the form of
+				// { "$": ["actor", ["actor", "id"]] } or { "$": ["device type"] }
+				// we are only interested in the first case, since this is a relationship
+				// to a different resource
+				const mapping = object.$;
+				if (
+					mapping.length === 2 &&
+					Array.isArray(mapping[1]) &&
+					mapping[1].length === 2 &&
+					typeof mapping[1][0] === 'string'
+				) {
+					// now have ensured that mapping looks like ["actor", ["actor", "id"]]
+					// this relations ship means that:
+					//   mapping[0] is the local field
+					//   mapping[1] is the reference to the other resource, that joins this resource
+					//   mapping[1][0] is the name of the other resource (actor in the example)
+					//   mapping[1][1] is the name of the field on the other resource
+					//
+					// this therefore defines that the local field `actor` needs
+					// to match the `id` of the `actor` resources for the join
+
+					const possibleTargetResourceName = mapping[1][0];
+
+					// Skip this if we already shortcut this connection
+					if (possibleTargetResourceName.endsWith('$bypass')) {
+						return;
+					}
 
-					const collapsedPermissionFilters = buildODataPermission(
-						permissionsLookup,
-						methodPermissions.GET,
-						vocabulary,
-						targetResourceEscaped,
-						odata,
+					const targetResourceEscaped = sqlNameToODataName(
+						abstractSqlModel.tables[possibleTargetResourceName]?.name ??
+							possibleTargetResourceName,
 					);
 
-					if (collapsedPermissionFilters == null) {
-						// If we have full access already then there's no need to
-						// check for/rewrite based on `canAccess`
+					// This is either a translated or bypassed resource we don't
+					// mess with these
+					if (targetResourceEscaped.includes('$')) {
 						return;
 					}
 
-					_.set(
-						odata,
-						['tree', 'options', '$filter'],
-						collapsedPermissionFilters,
-					);
+					let foundCanAccessLink = false;
 
-					const canAccessFunction: ResourceFunction = function (
-						property: AnyObject,
-					) {
-						// remove method property so that we won't loop back here again at this point
-						delete property.method;
+					try {
+						const odata = memoizedParseOdata(`/${targetResourceEscaped}`);
+
+						const collapsedPermissionFilters = buildODataPermission(
+							permissionsLookup,
+							methodPermissions.GET,
+							vocabulary,
+							targetResourceEscaped,
+							odata,
+						);
 
-						if (!this.defaultResource) {
-							throw new Error(`No resource selected in AST.`);
+						if (collapsedPermissionFilters == null) {
+							// If we have full access already then there's no need to
+							// check for/rewrite based on `canAccess`
+							return;
 						}
 
-						const targetResourceAST = this.NavigateResources(
-							this.defaultResource,
-							property.name,
-						);
-
-						const targetResourceName = sqlNameToODataName(
-							targetResourceAST.resource.name,
-						);
-						const currentResourceName = sqlNameToODataName(
-							this.defaultResource.name,
+						_.set(
+							odata,
+							['tree', 'options', '$filter'],
+							collapsedPermissionFilters,
 						);
 
-						if (
-							currentResourceName === targetResourceEscaped &&
-							targetResourceName === escapedName
+						const canAccessFunction: ResourceFunction = function (
+							property: AnyObject,
 						) {
-							foundCanAccessLink = true;
+							// remove method property so that we won't loop back here again at this point
+							delete property.method;
+
+							if (!this.defaultResource) {
+								throw new Error(`No resource selected in AST.`);
+							}
+
+							const targetResourceAST = this.NavigateResources(
+								this.defaultResource,
+								property.name,
+							);
+
+							const targetResourceName = sqlNameToODataName(
+								targetResourceAST.resource.name,
+							);
+							const currentResourceName = sqlNameToODataName(
+								this.defaultResource.name,
+							);
+
+							if (
+								currentResourceName === targetResourceEscaped &&
+								targetResourceName === escapedName
+							) {
+								foundCanAccessLink = true;
+							}
+							// return a true expression to not select the relationship, which might be virtual
+							return ['Boolean', true];
+						};
+
+						try {
+							// We need execute the abstract SQL compiler to traverse
+							// through the permissions for that resource, using a
+							// special canAccess callback.
+							odata2AbstractSQL.match(
+								odata.tree,
+								'GET',
+								[],
+								odata.binds.length,
+								{
+									canAccess: canAccessFunction,
+								},
+							);
+						} catch (e: any) {
+							throw new ODataParser.SyntaxError(e);
+						}
+						if (foundCanAccessLink) {
+							// store the resource name as it was with a $bypass
+							// suffix in this relationship, this means that the
+							// query generator will use the plain resource instead
+							// of the filtered resource.
+							mapping[1][0] = `${possibleTargetResourceName}$bypass`;
+						}
+					} catch (e) {
+						if (e === constrainedPermissionError) {
+							// ignore
+							return;
 						}
-						// return a true expression to not select the relationship, which might be virtual
-						return ['Boolean', true];
-					};
 
-					try {
-						// We need execute the abstract SQL compiler to traverse
-						// through the permissions for that resource, using a
-						// special canAccess callback.
-						odata2AbstractSQL.match(odata.tree, 'GET', [], odata.binds.length, {
-							canAccess: canAccessFunction,
-						});
-					} catch (e: any) {
-						throw new ODataParser.SyntaxError(e);
-					}
-					if (foundCanAccessLink) {
-						// store the resource name as it was with a $bypass
-						// suffix in this relationship, this means that the
-						// query generator will use the plain resource instead
-						// of the filtered resource.
-						ret = { ...ret };
-						const modifiedMapping = _.cloneDeep(mapping);
-						modifiedMapping[1]![0] = `${possibleTargetResourceName}$bypass`;
-						ret.$ = modifiedMapping;
-					}
-				} catch (e) {
-					if (e === constrainedPermissionError) {
-						// ignore
-						return;
-					}
+						// TODO: We should investigate in detail why this error
+						// occurse. It might be able to get rid of this.
+						if (e instanceof ODataParser.SyntaxError) {
+							// ignore
+							return;
+						}
 
-					// TODO: We should investigate in detail why this error
-					// occurse. It might be able to get rid of this.
-					if (e instanceof ODataParser.SyntaxError) {
-						// ignore
-						return;
+						throw e;
 					}
-
-					throw e;
 				}
 			}
-		}
 
-		if (typeof object === 'object') {
-			for (const key of Object.keys(object)) {
-				if (key === '$') {
-					continue;
-				}
-				const v = (object as RelationshipInternalNode)[key];
-				// we want to recurse into the relationship path, but
-				// in case we hit a plain string, we don't need to bother
-				// checking it. This can happen since plain terms also have
-				// relationships to sbvr-types.
-				if (typeof v !== 'string') {
-					const changedEntry = rewrite(v);
-					if (changedEntry) {
-						ret = { ...ret };
-						(ret as RelationshipInternalNode)[key] = changedEntry;
+			if (Array.isArray(object) || typeof object === 'object') {
+				_.forEach(object, (v) => {
+					// we want to recurse into the relationship path, but
+					// in case we hit a plain string, we don't need to bother
+					// checking it. This can happen since plain terms also have
+					// relationships to sbvr-types.
+					if (typeof v !== 'string') {
+						rewrite(v as Relationship | RelationshipMapping);
 					}
-				}
+				});
 			}
-		}
-
-		if (ret !== object) {
-			return ret;
-		}
-	};
+		};
 
-	return rewrite(value);
-};
+		rewrite(value);
+	},
+);
 
 const rewriteRelationships = (
 	abstractSqlModel: AbstractSqlModel,
@@ -962,20 +955,17 @@ const rewriteRelationships = (
 		originalAbstractSQLModel,
 	);
 
-	const newRelationships = { ...relationships };
-	for (const name of Object.keys(newRelationships)) {
-		const changedEntry = rewriteRelationship(
-			newRelationships[name],
+	const newRelationships = _.cloneDeep(relationships);
+	_.forOwn(newRelationships, (value, name) => {
+		rewriteRelationship(
+			value,
 			name,
 			abstractSqlModel,
 			permissionsLookup,
 			vocabulary,
 			odata2AbstractSQL,
 		);
-		if (changedEntry) {
-			newRelationships[name] = changedEntry as RelationshipInternalNode;
-		}
-	}
+	});
 
 	return newRelationships;
 };
@@ -995,18 +985,14 @@ const getBoundConstrainedMemoizer = memoizeWeak(
 				/** This is the final translated vocabulary that permissions get written against as that's what we will have to resolve permissions against */
 				finalVocabulary: string,
 			): AbstractSqlModel => {
-				const constrainedAbstractSqlModel: Omit<
-					AbstractSqlModel,
-					'tables' | 'relationships'
-				> & {
+				const constrainedAbstractSqlModel: Omit<AbstractSqlModel, 'tables'> & {
 					tables: {
 						[resourceName: string]: ShallowWritableOnly<AbstractSqlTable>;
 					};
-					relationships: ShallowWritableOnly<AbstractSqlModel['relationships']>;
 				} = {
 					...abstractSqlModel,
 					synonyms: _.cloneDeep(abstractSqlModel.synonyms),
-					relationships: {},
+					relationships: _.cloneDeep(abstractSqlModel.relationships),
 					tables: {},
 				};
 				const baseTables = abstractSqlModel.tables;
@@ -1036,7 +1022,9 @@ const getBoundConstrainedMemoizer = memoizeWeak(
 					},
 				);
 
-				const origRelationships = Object.keys(abstractSqlModel.relationships);
+				const origRelationships = Object.keys(
+					constrainedAbstractSqlModel.relationships,
+				);
 
 				const alreadyConstrainedTables = new Map<
 					ShallowWritableOnly<AbstractSqlTable>,
@@ -1175,7 +1163,7 @@ const getBoundConstrainedMemoizer = memoizeWeak(
 				// expands and filters to unconstraint resources
 				constrainedAbstractSqlModel.relationships = rewriteRelationships(
 					constrainedAbstractSqlModel as AbstractSqlModel,
-					abstractSqlModel.relationships,
+					constrainedAbstractSqlModel.relationships,
 					permissionsLookup,
 					finalVocabulary,
 				);
@@ -1199,10 +1187,8 @@ const getBoundConstrainedMemoizer = memoizeWeak(
 								return;
 							}
 							for (const relationship of origRelationships) {
-								// TODO: Avoid this cloneDeep when not necessary
-								relationships[`${relationship}$${alias}`] = relationships[
-									relationship
-								] = _.cloneDeep(relationships[relationship]);
+								relationships[`${relationship}$${alias}`] =
+									relationships[relationship];
 								namespaceRelationships(relationships[relationship], alias);
 							}
 							return relationships[permissionResourceName];