@b9g/async-context 0.1.3 → 0.2.0-beta.0

package/README.md

@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 
 Lightweight polyfill for the [TC39 AsyncContext proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-context) using Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage`.
 
-## Why This Package?
-
 The TC39 AsyncContext proposal aims to standardize async context propagation in JavaScript. However:
 
 - The proposal is still Stage 2 (not yet standardized)
@@ -12,11 +10,11 @@ The TC39 AsyncContext proposal aims to standardize async context propagation in
 
 This package provides a **lightweight, maintainable polyfill** that:
 
-✅ Implements the TC39 `AsyncContext.Variable` and `AsyncContext.Snapshot` APIs
-✅ Uses battle-tested `AsyncLocalStorage` under the hood
-✅ Zero dependencies (beyond Node.js built-ins)
-✅ Full TypeScript support
-✅ Production-ready and well-tested
+- Implements the TC39 `AsyncContext.Variable` and `AsyncContext.Snapshot` APIs
+- Uses battle-tested `AsyncLocalStorage` under the hood
+- Zero dependencies (beyond Node.js built-ins)
+- Full TypeScript support
+- Production-ready and well-tested
 
 ## Installation
 
@@ -31,7 +29,7 @@ bun add @b9g/async-context
 ### Basic Example
 
 ```typescript
-import { AsyncContext } from "@b9g/async-context";
+import {AsyncContext} from "@b9g/async-context";
 
 // Create a context variable
 const userContext = new AsyncContext.Variable<User>();
@@ -48,7 +46,7 @@ userContext.run(currentUser, async () => {
 ### Request Context (Web Server)
 
 ```typescript
-import { AsyncVariable } from "@b9g/async-context";
+import {AsyncVariable} from "@b9g/async-context";
 
 interface RequestContext {
   requestId: string;
@@ -227,17 +225,17 @@ The polyfill provides:
 
 This package works in any JavaScript runtime that supports `AsyncLocalStorage`:
 
-- ✅ Node.js 12.17+ (native support)
-- ✅ Bun (native support)
-- ✅ Cloudflare Workers (via Node.js compatibility)
-- ⚠️ Deno (via Node.js compatibility layer: `import { AsyncLocalStorage } from "node:async_hooks"`)
+- Node.js 12.17+
+- Bun
+- Deno
+- Cloudflare Workers (with "nodejs_compat" flag)
 
 ## Differences from TC39 Proposal
 
 This polyfill implements the core TC39 AsyncContext API:
 
-- ✅ `AsyncContext.Variable` - context variables with `run()` and `get()`
-- ✅ `AsyncContext.Snapshot` - context capture with `run()` and `wrap()`
+- `AsyncContext.Variable` - context variables with `run()` and `get()`
+- `AsyncContext.Snapshot` - context capture with `run()` and `wrap()`
 
 The implementation uses Node.js `AsyncLocalStorage` rather than the pure-JS reference implementation, which means async context propagation works natively without monkey-patching `Promise.prototype.then`.
 
@@ -273,4 +271,4 @@ MIT
 
 - [TC39 AsyncContext Proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-context)
 - [Node.js AsyncLocalStorage](https://nodejs.org/api/async_context.html#class-asynclocalstorage)
-- [Shovel Framework](https://github.com/b9g/shovel)
+- [Shovel Framework](https://github.com/bikeshaving/shovel)

package/package.json

@@ -1,24 +1,21 @@
 {
   "name": "@b9g/async-context",
-  "version": "0.1.3",
+  "version": "0.2.0-beta.0",
   "description": "Lightweight AsyncContext polyfill for JavaScript runtimes. Implements TC39 AsyncContext proposal using AsyncLocalStorage.",
   "keywords": [
     "asynccontext",
     "async-context",
-    "context",
     "async-local-storage",
     "asynclocalstorage",
     "tc39",
     "polyfill",
     "async",
-    "continuation",
     "shovel"
   ],
   "dependencies": {},
   "devDependencies": {
     "@b9g/libuild": "^0.1.18",
-    "@types/node": "^20.0.0",
-    "bun-types": "latest"
+    "@types/node": "^20.0.0"
   },
   "type": "module",
   "types": "src/index.d.ts",

package/src/index.js

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 // src/index.ts
 import { AsyncLocalStorage } from "node:async_hooks";
 var variableRegistry = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
-var NO_VALUE = Symbol("NO_VALUE");
+var NO_VALUE = /* @__PURE__ */ Symbol("NO_VALUE");
 var AsyncVariable = class {
   #storage;
   #defaultValue;