@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.e558bd1c → 0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +51 -10
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +21 -8
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +124 -46
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +26 -6
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +6 -12
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +7 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +6 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -3
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -2
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +107 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +963 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +34 -17
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +157 -191
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +142 -39
- package/src/config.ts +26 -6
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +12 -11
- package/src/factory.ts +9 -3
- package/src/index.ts +1 -2
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +1 -1
- package/src/metrics.ts +19 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1027 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +214 -212
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -63
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -546
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -19
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -555
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -154
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,25 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import { BlockNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
-
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
2
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
6
3
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
7
4
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
8
5
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
6
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
7
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
8
|
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
-
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
13
9
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
10
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
15
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
11
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
16
12
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
17
13
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
18
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
19
14
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
20
15
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
21
16
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
22
17
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
18
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
23
19
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
24
20
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
25
21
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
@@ -34,13 +30,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
34
30
|
keyStore;
|
|
35
31
|
epochCache;
|
|
36
32
|
p2pClient;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
33
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
38
34
|
blockSource;
|
|
39
35
|
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
40
36
|
worldState;
|
|
41
37
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
42
38
|
config;
|
|
43
39
|
blobClient;
|
|
40
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
44
41
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
42
|
tracer;
|
|
46
43
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,13 +45,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
45
|
log;
|
|
49
46
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
47
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
48
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
49
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
50
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
51
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
52
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
55
53
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
54
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
55
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
56
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
58
57
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
59
58
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
60
59
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -93,6 +92,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
93
92
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
94
93
|
return;
|
|
95
94
|
}
|
|
95
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
96
96
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
97
97
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
98
98
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -108,30 +108,49 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
108
108
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
109
109
|
}
|
|
110
110
|
}
|
|
111
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
111
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
112
112
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
113
113
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
114
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
114
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
115
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
115
116
|
});
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
117
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
118
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
119
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
120
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
121
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
122
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
123
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
124
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
125
|
+
}));
|
|
126
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
127
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
119
128
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
120
129
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
121
130
|
...config,
|
|
122
131
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
123
132
|
};
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
133
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
134
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
135
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
136
|
+
}));
|
|
137
|
+
} else {
|
|
138
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
139
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
140
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
141
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
142
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
143
|
+
}));
|
|
126
144
|
}
|
|
127
|
-
const
|
|
145
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
146
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
128
147
|
return validator;
|
|
129
148
|
}
|
|
130
149
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
131
150
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
132
151
|
}
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
return this.
|
|
152
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
153
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
135
154
|
}
|
|
136
155
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
137
156
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
@@ -151,6 +170,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
151
170
|
...config
|
|
152
171
|
};
|
|
153
172
|
}
|
|
173
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
174
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
175
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
176
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
177
|
+
}
|
|
154
178
|
async start() {
|
|
155
179
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
156
180
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
@@ -182,11 +206,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
182
206
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
183
207
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
184
208
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
185
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
209
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
186
210
|
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
187
211
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
188
212
|
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
189
213
|
});
|
|
214
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
215
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
216
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
217
|
+
});
|
|
190
218
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
191
219
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
192
220
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -207,6 +235,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
207
235
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
208
236
|
return false;
|
|
209
237
|
}
|
|
238
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
239
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
240
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
241
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
242
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
243
|
+
});
|
|
244
|
+
}
|
|
210
245
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
211
246
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
212
247
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -221,12 +256,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
221
256
|
});
|
|
222
257
|
// Reexecute txs if we are part of the committee, or if slashing is enabled, or if we are configured to always reexecute.
|
|
223
258
|
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
224
|
-
const {
|
|
225
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n
|
|
226
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
259
|
+
const { slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
260
|
+
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n || partOfCommittee || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
261
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
227
262
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
228
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
229
263
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
264
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
230
265
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
231
266
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
232
267
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -266,46 +301,44 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
266
301
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
267
302
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
268
303
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
269
|
-
const
|
|
304
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
270
305
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
271
306
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
272
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
273
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
307
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
308
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
274
309
|
return undefined;
|
|
275
310
|
}
|
|
276
|
-
//
|
|
277
|
-
if (
|
|
278
|
-
this.log.
|
|
311
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
312
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
313
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
314
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
315
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
316
|
+
});
|
|
279
317
|
return undefined;
|
|
280
318
|
}
|
|
281
|
-
// Check that I have any address in
|
|
282
|
-
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(
|
|
319
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
320
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
283
321
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
284
322
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
285
|
-
|
|
323
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
286
324
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
287
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
288
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
325
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
289
326
|
};
|
|
290
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
327
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
291
328
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
292
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
293
329
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
294
330
|
});
|
|
295
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
331
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
332
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
296
333
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
297
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
334
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
298
335
|
} else {
|
|
299
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
336
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
300
337
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
301
338
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
302
339
|
return undefined;
|
|
303
340
|
}
|
|
304
341
|
}
|
|
305
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
306
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
307
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
308
|
-
}
|
|
309
342
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
310
343
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
311
344
|
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
@@ -313,12 +346,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
313
346
|
return undefined;
|
|
314
347
|
}
|
|
315
348
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
316
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
349
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
317
350
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
318
351
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
319
352
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
320
353
|
});
|
|
321
354
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
355
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
356
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
357
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
358
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
359
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
360
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
361
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
362
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
363
|
+
}
|
|
364
|
+
}
|
|
322
365
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
323
366
|
let attestors;
|
|
324
367
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -335,151 +378,39 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
335
378
|
}
|
|
336
379
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
337
380
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
338
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
381
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
339
382
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
340
383
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
341
384
|
});
|
|
342
385
|
return undefined;
|
|
343
386
|
}
|
|
344
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
345
|
-
}
|
|
346
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
347
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
348
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
349
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
387
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
350
388
|
}
|
|
351
389
|
/**
|
|
352
|
-
*
|
|
353
|
-
* @returns
|
|
354
|
-
*/
|
|
355
|
-
|
|
356
|
-
|
|
357
|
-
|
|
358
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
359
|
-
try {
|
|
360
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
361
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
362
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
363
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
364
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
365
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
366
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
367
|
-
return {
|
|
368
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
369
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
370
|
-
};
|
|
371
|
-
}
|
|
372
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
373
|
-
return {
|
|
374
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
375
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
376
|
-
};
|
|
377
|
-
}
|
|
378
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
379
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
380
|
-
return {
|
|
381
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
382
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
383
|
-
};
|
|
390
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
391
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
392
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
393
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
394
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
395
|
+
return true;
|
|
384
396
|
}
|
|
385
|
-
//
|
|
386
|
-
|
|
387
|
-
|
|
388
|
-
|
|
389
|
-
return {
|
|
390
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
391
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
392
|
-
};
|
|
393
|
-
}
|
|
394
|
-
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
395
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
396
|
-
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
397
|
-
});
|
|
398
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
399
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
400
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
401
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
402
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
403
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
404
|
-
// Compute the previous checkpoint out hashes for the epoch.
|
|
405
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
406
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
407
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
408
|
-
const previousCheckpoints = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsForEpoch(epoch)).filter((b)=>b.number < checkpointNumber).sort((a, b)=>a.number - b.number);
|
|
409
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
410
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
411
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
412
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
413
|
-
try {
|
|
414
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
415
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
416
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
417
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
418
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
419
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
420
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
421
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
422
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
423
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
424
|
-
});
|
|
425
|
-
return {
|
|
426
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
427
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
428
|
-
};
|
|
429
|
-
}
|
|
430
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
431
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
432
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
433
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
434
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
435
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
436
|
-
});
|
|
437
|
-
return {
|
|
438
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
439
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
440
|
-
};
|
|
441
|
-
}
|
|
442
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
443
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
444
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
445
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
446
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
447
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
448
|
-
]);
|
|
449
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
450
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
451
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
452
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
453
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
454
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
455
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
456
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
457
|
-
});
|
|
458
|
-
return {
|
|
459
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
460
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
461
|
-
};
|
|
462
|
-
}
|
|
463
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
464
|
-
return {
|
|
465
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
466
|
-
};
|
|
467
|
-
} finally{
|
|
468
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
397
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
398
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
399
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
400
|
+
return false;
|
|
469
401
|
}
|
|
402
|
+
return true;
|
|
470
403
|
}
|
|
471
|
-
|
|
472
|
-
|
|
473
|
-
|
|
474
|
-
|
|
475
|
-
|
|
476
|
-
|
|
477
|
-
|
|
478
|
-
|
|
479
|
-
|
|
480
|
-
|
|
481
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
482
|
-
};
|
|
404
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
405
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
406
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
407
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
408
|
+
}
|
|
409
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
410
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
411
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
412
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
413
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
483
414
|
}
|
|
484
415
|
/**
|
|
485
416
|
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
@@ -496,7 +427,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
496
427
|
return;
|
|
497
428
|
}
|
|
498
429
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
499
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
430
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
500
431
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
501
432
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
502
433
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -548,23 +479,55 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
548
479
|
}
|
|
549
480
|
]);
|
|
550
481
|
}
|
|
482
|
+
/**
|
|
483
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
484
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
485
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
486
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
487
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
488
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
489
|
+
slot
|
|
490
|
+
});
|
|
491
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
492
|
+
{
|
|
493
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
494
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
495
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
496
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
497
|
+
}
|
|
498
|
+
]);
|
|
499
|
+
}
|
|
551
500
|
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
552
|
-
//
|
|
553
|
-
|
|
554
|
-
|
|
555
|
-
|
|
556
|
-
|
|
501
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
502
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
503
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
504
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
505
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
506
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
507
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
508
|
+
}
|
|
509
|
+
}
|
|
557
510
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
558
511
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
559
512
|
...options,
|
|
560
513
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
561
514
|
});
|
|
562
|
-
this.
|
|
515
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
563
516
|
return newProposal;
|
|
564
517
|
}
|
|
565
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
518
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
519
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
520
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
521
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
522
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
523
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
524
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
525
|
+
}
|
|
526
|
+
}
|
|
566
527
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
567
|
-
|
|
528
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
529
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
530
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
568
531
|
}
|
|
569
532
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
570
533
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
@@ -579,6 +542,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
579
542
|
inCommittee
|
|
580
543
|
});
|
|
581
544
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
545
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
546
|
+
return [];
|
|
547
|
+
}
|
|
582
548
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
583
549
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
584
550
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,30 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
-
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
90
|
-
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.e588bc7e5",
|
|
91
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
92
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
93
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|