@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.e3c1de76 → 0.0.1-commit.e57c76e
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +61 -18
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +21 -8
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +124 -46
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +37 -7
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +33 -45
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +10 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +11 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -3
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -2
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +3 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +14 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +24 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +134 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1072 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +58 -23
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +362 -228
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +142 -39
- package/src/config.ts +37 -6
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +59 -54
- package/src/factory.ts +20 -3
- package/src/index.ts +1 -2
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +3 -3
- package/src/metrics.ts +37 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1161 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +487 -270
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -63
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -546
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -19
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -555
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -154
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,46 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
3
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
4
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
6
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
7
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
8
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
10
|
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
-
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
13
11
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
12
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
15
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
13
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
16
14
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
17
15
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
18
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
19
16
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
20
17
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
21
18
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
22
19
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
20
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
23
21
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
24
22
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
25
23
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
24
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS = 1000;
|
|
25
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
26
27
|
// What errors from the block proposal handler result in slashing
|
|
27
28
|
const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
28
29
|
'state_mismatch',
|
|
29
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
30
|
+
'failed_txs',
|
|
31
|
+
'global_variables_mismatch',
|
|
32
|
+
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
33
|
+
'parent_block_wrong_slot',
|
|
34
|
+
'in_hash_mismatch'
|
|
30
35
|
];
|
|
36
|
+
const SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = {
|
|
37
|
+
// enabled
|
|
38
|
+
['invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier']: true,
|
|
39
|
+
['checkpoint_header_mismatch']: true,
|
|
40
|
+
// These late mismatches should normally be caught by earlier checks, but if reached after validating the local
|
|
41
|
+
// checkpoint inputs, the proposer-signed payload disagrees with deterministic recomputation.
|
|
42
|
+
['archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
43
|
+
['out_hash_mismatch']: true,
|
|
44
|
+
['no_blocks_for_slot']: true,
|
|
45
|
+
['too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint']: true,
|
|
46
|
+
['checkpoint_validation_failed']: true,
|
|
47
|
+
['last_block_archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
48
|
+
// disabled
|
|
49
|
+
['invalid_signature']: false,
|
|
50
|
+
['last_block_not_found']: false,
|
|
51
|
+
['block_fetch_error']: false,
|
|
52
|
+
['checkpoint_already_published']: false
|
|
53
|
+
};
|
|
31
54
|
/**
|
|
32
55
|
* Validator Client
|
|
33
56
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
34
57
|
keyStore;
|
|
35
58
|
epochCache;
|
|
36
59
|
p2pClient;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
60
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
38
61
|
blockSource;
|
|
39
62
|
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
40
63
|
worldState;
|
|
41
64
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
42
65
|
config;
|
|
43
66
|
blobClient;
|
|
67
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
44
68
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
69
|
tracer;
|
|
46
70
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,18 +72,25 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
72
|
log;
|
|
49
73
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
74
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
75
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
76
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
77
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
78
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
79
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
55
80
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
81
|
+
slotsWithInvalidProposals;
|
|
82
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
83
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
84
|
+
slotsWithProposalEquivocation;
|
|
85
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
86
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
87
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.slotsWithInvalidProposals = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS), this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
58
88
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
59
89
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
60
90
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
61
91
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
62
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
92
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
93
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
63
94
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
64
95
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
65
96
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -93,6 +124,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
93
124
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
94
125
|
return;
|
|
95
126
|
}
|
|
127
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
96
128
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
97
129
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
98
130
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -108,34 +140,65 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
108
140
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
109
141
|
}
|
|
110
142
|
}
|
|
111
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
143
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
112
144
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
113
145
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
114
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
146
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
147
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
148
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
149
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
150
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
151
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
152
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
153
|
+
}
|
|
115
154
|
});
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
155
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
156
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
157
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
158
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
159
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
160
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
161
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
162
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
163
|
+
}));
|
|
164
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
165
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
119
166
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
120
167
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
121
168
|
...config,
|
|
122
169
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
123
170
|
};
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
171
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
172
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
173
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
174
|
+
}));
|
|
175
|
+
} else {
|
|
176
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
177
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
178
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
179
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
180
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
181
|
+
}));
|
|
126
182
|
}
|
|
127
|
-
const
|
|
183
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
184
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
128
185
|
return validator;
|
|
129
186
|
}
|
|
130
187
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
131
188
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
132
189
|
}
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
return this.
|
|
190
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
191
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
135
192
|
}
|
|
136
193
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
137
194
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
138
195
|
}
|
|
196
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
197
|
+
return {
|
|
198
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
199
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
200
|
+
};
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
139
202
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
140
203
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
141
204
|
}
|
|
@@ -145,11 +208,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
145
208
|
getConfig() {
|
|
146
209
|
return this.config;
|
|
147
210
|
}
|
|
211
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
212
|
+
return this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber);
|
|
213
|
+
}
|
|
214
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
215
|
+
return this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber);
|
|
216
|
+
}
|
|
148
217
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
149
218
|
this.config = {
|
|
150
219
|
...this.config,
|
|
151
220
|
...config
|
|
152
221
|
};
|
|
222
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
223
|
+
}
|
|
224
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
225
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
226
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
227
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
153
228
|
}
|
|
154
229
|
async start() {
|
|
155
230
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
@@ -182,7 +257,18 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
182
257
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
183
258
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
184
259
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
185
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
260
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
261
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
262
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
263
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
264
|
+
});
|
|
265
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
266
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
267
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
268
|
+
});
|
|
269
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
270
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
271
|
+
});
|
|
186
272
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
187
273
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
188
274
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -203,6 +289,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
203
289
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
204
290
|
return false;
|
|
205
291
|
}
|
|
292
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
293
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
294
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
295
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
296
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
297
|
+
});
|
|
298
|
+
}
|
|
206
299
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
207
300
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
208
301
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -215,14 +308,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
215
308
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
216
309
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
217
310
|
});
|
|
218
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
221
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
222
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
311
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
312
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
223
313
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
224
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
225
314
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
315
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
226
316
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
227
317
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
228
318
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -237,10 +327,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
237
327
|
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
238
328
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
239
329
|
}
|
|
240
|
-
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
|
|
330
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
331
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
332
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
333
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
334
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
335
|
+
});
|
|
243
336
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
337
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
244
338
|
}
|
|
245
339
|
return false;
|
|
246
340
|
}
|
|
@@ -262,45 +356,50 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
262
356
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
263
357
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
264
358
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
265
|
-
const
|
|
359
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
266
360
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
267
361
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
268
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
269
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
362
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
363
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
270
364
|
return undefined;
|
|
271
365
|
}
|
|
272
|
-
//
|
|
273
|
-
if (!
|
|
274
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
366
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
367
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
275
368
|
return undefined;
|
|
276
369
|
}
|
|
277
|
-
//
|
|
278
|
-
|
|
370
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
371
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
372
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
373
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
374
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
375
|
+
});
|
|
376
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
377
|
+
}
|
|
378
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
379
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
279
380
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
280
381
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
382
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
282
383
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
283
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
284
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
384
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
285
385
|
};
|
|
286
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
386
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
287
387
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
288
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
289
388
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
290
389
|
});
|
|
291
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
390
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
391
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
392
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
292
393
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
293
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
394
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
395
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
294
396
|
} else {
|
|
295
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
397
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
296
398
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
297
399
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
298
400
|
return undefined;
|
|
299
401
|
}
|
|
300
|
-
|
|
301
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
302
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
303
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
402
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
304
403
|
}
|
|
305
404
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
306
405
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
@@ -309,12 +408,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
309
408
|
return undefined;
|
|
310
409
|
}
|
|
311
410
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
312
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
411
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
313
412
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
314
413
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
315
414
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
316
415
|
});
|
|
317
416
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
417
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
418
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
419
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
420
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
421
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
422
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
423
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
424
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
425
|
+
}
|
|
426
|
+
}
|
|
318
427
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
319
428
|
let attestors;
|
|
320
429
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -331,157 +440,47 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
331
440
|
}
|
|
332
441
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
333
442
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
334
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
335
444
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
336
445
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
337
446
|
});
|
|
338
447
|
return undefined;
|
|
339
448
|
}
|
|
340
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
341
|
-
}
|
|
342
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
343
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
344
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
345
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
449
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
346
450
|
}
|
|
347
451
|
/**
|
|
348
|
-
*
|
|
349
|
-
* @returns
|
|
350
|
-
*/
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
353
|
-
|
|
354
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
355
|
-
try {
|
|
356
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
357
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
358
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
359
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
360
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
361
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
362
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
363
|
-
return {
|
|
364
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
365
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
366
|
-
};
|
|
367
|
-
}
|
|
368
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
369
|
-
return {
|
|
370
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
371
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
372
|
-
};
|
|
373
|
-
}
|
|
374
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
375
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
376
|
-
return {
|
|
377
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
378
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
379
|
-
};
|
|
380
|
-
}
|
|
381
|
-
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
382
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
383
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
384
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
385
|
-
return {
|
|
386
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
387
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
388
|
-
};
|
|
452
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
453
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
454
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
455
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
456
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
457
|
+
return true;
|
|
389
458
|
}
|
|
390
|
-
|
|
391
|
-
|
|
392
|
-
|
|
393
|
-
|
|
394
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
395
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
396
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
397
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
398
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
399
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
400
|
-
// Compute the previous checkpoint out hashes for the epoch.
|
|
401
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
402
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
403
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
404
|
-
const previousCheckpoints = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsForEpoch(epoch)).filter((b)=>b.number < checkpointNumber).sort((a, b)=>a.number - b.number);
|
|
405
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
406
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
407
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
408
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
409
|
-
try {
|
|
410
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
411
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
412
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
413
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
414
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
415
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
416
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
417
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
418
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
419
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
420
|
-
});
|
|
421
|
-
return {
|
|
422
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
423
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
424
|
-
};
|
|
425
|
-
}
|
|
426
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
427
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
428
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
429
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
430
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
431
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
432
|
-
});
|
|
433
|
-
return {
|
|
434
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
435
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
436
|
-
};
|
|
437
|
-
}
|
|
438
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
439
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
440
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
441
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
442
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
443
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
444
|
-
]);
|
|
445
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
446
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
447
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
448
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
449
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
450
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
451
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
452
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
453
|
-
});
|
|
454
|
-
return {
|
|
455
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
456
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
457
|
-
};
|
|
458
|
-
}
|
|
459
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
460
|
-
return {
|
|
461
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
462
|
-
};
|
|
463
|
-
} finally{
|
|
464
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
459
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
460
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
461
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
462
|
+
return false;
|
|
465
463
|
}
|
|
464
|
+
return true;
|
|
466
465
|
}
|
|
467
|
-
|
|
468
|
-
|
|
469
|
-
|
|
470
|
-
|
|
471
|
-
|
|
472
|
-
|
|
473
|
-
|
|
474
|
-
|
|
475
|
-
|
|
476
|
-
|
|
477
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
478
|
-
};
|
|
466
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
467
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
468
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
469
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
470
|
+
}
|
|
471
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
472
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
473
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
474
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
475
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
479
476
|
}
|
|
480
477
|
/**
|
|
481
478
|
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
482
479
|
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
483
480
|
try {
|
|
484
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.
|
|
481
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
482
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
483
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
485
484
|
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
486
485
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
487
486
|
return;
|
|
@@ -492,7 +491,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
492
491
|
return;
|
|
493
492
|
}
|
|
494
493
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
495
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
494
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
496
495
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
497
496
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
498
497
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -509,11 +508,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
509
508
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
510
509
|
return;
|
|
511
510
|
}
|
|
512
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
513
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
514
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
515
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
516
|
-
}
|
|
517
511
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
518
512
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
519
513
|
{
|
|
@@ -524,37 +518,185 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
524
518
|
}
|
|
525
519
|
]);
|
|
526
520
|
}
|
|
527
|
-
|
|
528
|
-
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
|
|
531
|
-
|
|
532
|
-
|
|
521
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
522
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
523
|
+
return;
|
|
524
|
+
}
|
|
525
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
526
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
527
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
528
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
529
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
530
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
531
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
532
|
+
});
|
|
533
|
+
}
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
536
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
537
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
538
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
539
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
540
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
541
|
+
});
|
|
542
|
+
return false;
|
|
543
|
+
}
|
|
544
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
545
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
546
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
547
|
+
return false;
|
|
548
|
+
}
|
|
549
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
550
|
+
{
|
|
551
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
552
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
553
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
554
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
555
|
+
}
|
|
556
|
+
]);
|
|
557
|
+
return true;
|
|
558
|
+
}
|
|
559
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
560
|
+
this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.add(slotNumber);
|
|
561
|
+
}
|
|
562
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
563
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
564
|
+
if (!this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber) || this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
565
|
+
return;
|
|
566
|
+
}
|
|
567
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
568
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
569
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
570
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
571
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
572
|
+
});
|
|
573
|
+
return;
|
|
574
|
+
}
|
|
575
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
576
|
+
}
|
|
577
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
578
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
579
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
580
|
+
return;
|
|
581
|
+
}
|
|
582
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
583
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
584
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
585
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
586
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
587
|
+
});
|
|
588
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
589
|
+
{
|
|
590
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
591
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
592
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
593
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
594
|
+
}
|
|
595
|
+
]);
|
|
596
|
+
}
|
|
597
|
+
/**
|
|
598
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
599
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
600
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
601
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
602
|
+
this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.add(slot);
|
|
603
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
604
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
605
|
+
slot,
|
|
606
|
+
type,
|
|
607
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
608
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
609
|
+
});
|
|
610
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
611
|
+
{
|
|
612
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
613
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
614
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
615
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
616
|
+
}
|
|
617
|
+
]);
|
|
618
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
619
|
+
{
|
|
620
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
621
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
622
|
+
}
|
|
623
|
+
]);
|
|
624
|
+
}
|
|
625
|
+
/**
|
|
626
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
627
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
628
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
629
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
630
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
631
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
632
|
+
slot,
|
|
633
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
634
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
635
|
+
});
|
|
636
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
637
|
+
{
|
|
638
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
639
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
640
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
641
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
642
|
+
}
|
|
643
|
+
]);
|
|
644
|
+
}
|
|
645
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
646
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
647
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
648
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
649
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
650
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
651
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
652
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
654
|
+
}
|
|
533
655
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
534
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
656
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
535
657
|
...options,
|
|
536
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
658
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
537
659
|
});
|
|
538
|
-
this.
|
|
660
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
539
661
|
return newProposal;
|
|
540
662
|
}
|
|
541
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive,
|
|
663
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
664
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
665
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
666
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
667
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
668
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
669
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
670
|
+
}
|
|
671
|
+
}
|
|
542
672
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
543
|
-
|
|
673
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
674
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
675
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
676
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
677
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
678
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
679
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
680
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
681
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
682
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
544
683
|
}
|
|
545
684
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
546
685
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
547
686
|
}
|
|
548
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
549
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
687
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
688
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
550
689
|
}
|
|
551
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
690
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
552
691
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
553
692
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
554
693
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
555
694
|
inCommittee
|
|
556
695
|
});
|
|
557
|
-
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
696
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
697
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
698
|
+
return [];
|
|
699
|
+
}
|
|
558
700
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
559
701
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
560
702
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
@@ -563,7 +705,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
563
705
|
});
|
|
564
706
|
return attestations;
|
|
565
707
|
}
|
|
566
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
708
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
567
709
|
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
568
710
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
569
711
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
@@ -571,28 +713,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
571
713
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
572
714
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
573
715
|
}
|
|
574
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
575
|
-
const
|
|
716
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
717
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
576
718
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
577
719
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
578
720
|
while(true){
|
|
579
|
-
//
|
|
580
|
-
//
|
|
581
|
-
|
|
582
|
-
|
|
583
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
584
|
-
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
585
|
-
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
586
|
-
});
|
|
587
|
-
return false;
|
|
588
|
-
}
|
|
589
|
-
return true;
|
|
590
|
-
});
|
|
721
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
722
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
723
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
724
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
591
725
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
592
726
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
593
727
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
594
728
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
595
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
729
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
596
730
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
597
731
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
598
732
|
continue;
|