@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.d3ec352c → 0.0.1-commit.d58ff9d0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +327 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +81 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +259 -0
- package/dest/config.d.ts +9 -3
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +56 -14
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +44 -16
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +102 -31
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +22 -11
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +19 -6
- package/dest/index.d.ts +3 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +99 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +208 -0
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.js +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts +36 -6
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.js +9 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts +18 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js +18 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +19 -6
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +41 -46
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +16 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +58 -30
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +165 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1207 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +93 -25
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +491 -89
- package/package.json +21 -11
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +426 -0
- package/src/config.ts +63 -15
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +168 -41
- package/src/factory.ts +46 -12
- package/src/index.ts +2 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +269 -0
- package/src/key_store/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/key_store/interface.ts +44 -5
- package/src/key_store/local_key_store.ts +14 -5
- package/src/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.ts +28 -5
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +61 -64
- package/src/metrics.ts +81 -33
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1314 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +721 -139
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -53
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -290
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -344
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,32 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
1
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
2
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
3
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
4
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
5
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
6
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
10
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
11
|
+
import { ConsensusTimetable } from '@aztec/stdlib/timetable';
|
|
7
12
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
8
13
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
14
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
15
|
+
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
9
16
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
10
|
-
import {
|
|
17
|
+
import { DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS } from './config.js';
|
|
11
18
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
19
|
+
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
12
20
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
13
21
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
22
|
+
import { ProposalHandler, SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT, SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
14
23
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
15
24
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
16
25
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
const
|
|
19
|
-
'state_mismatch',
|
|
20
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
21
|
-
];
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
27
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
22
28
|
/**
|
|
23
29
|
* Validator Client
|
|
24
30
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
25
31
|
keyStore;
|
|
26
32
|
epochCache;
|
|
27
33
|
p2pClient;
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
35
|
+
blockSource;
|
|
36
|
+
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
37
|
+
worldState;
|
|
38
|
+
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
29
39
|
config;
|
|
40
|
+
blobClient;
|
|
41
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
30
42
|
dateProvider;
|
|
31
43
|
tracer;
|
|
32
44
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -34,18 +46,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
34
46
|
log;
|
|
35
47
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
36
48
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
49
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
50
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
39
51
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
40
52
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
53
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
41
54
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
55
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
56
|
+
oversizedProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
57
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
58
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
59
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS);
|
|
44
61
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
45
62
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
46
63
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
47
64
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
48
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
65
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
66
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
49
67
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
50
68
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
51
69
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -79,6 +97,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
79
97
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
80
98
|
return;
|
|
81
99
|
}
|
|
100
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
82
101
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
83
102
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
84
103
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -94,27 +113,69 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
94
113
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
95
114
|
}
|
|
96
115
|
}
|
|
97
|
-
static new(config,
|
|
116
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
98
117
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
99
|
-
const
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
118
|
+
const consensusTimetable = new ConsensusTimetable({
|
|
119
|
+
l1Constants: epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
120
|
+
blockDuration: config.blockDurationMs / 1000
|
|
101
121
|
});
|
|
102
|
-
const
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
122
|
+
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, consensusTimetable, {
|
|
123
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
124
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
125
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
126
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
127
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
128
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
129
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
130
|
+
},
|
|
131
|
+
clockDisparityMs: config.maxGossipClockDisparityMs ?? DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS
|
|
132
|
+
});
|
|
133
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, consensusTimetable, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
134
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
135
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
136
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
137
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
138
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
139
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
140
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
141
|
+
}));
|
|
142
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
143
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
144
|
+
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
145
|
+
const haConfig = {
|
|
146
|
+
...config,
|
|
147
|
+
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
148
|
+
};
|
|
149
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
150
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
151
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
152
|
+
}));
|
|
153
|
+
} else {
|
|
154
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
155
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
156
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
157
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
158
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
159
|
+
}));
|
|
160
|
+
}
|
|
161
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
162
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
104
163
|
return validator;
|
|
105
164
|
}
|
|
106
165
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
107
166
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
108
167
|
}
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
return this.
|
|
168
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
169
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
111
170
|
}
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
return this.blockProposalHandler.reexecuteTransactions(proposal, blockNumber, txs, l1ToL2Messages);
|
|
171
|
+
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
172
|
+
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
115
173
|
}
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
return
|
|
174
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
175
|
+
return {
|
|
176
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
177
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
178
|
+
};
|
|
118
179
|
}
|
|
119
180
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
120
181
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
@@ -125,17 +186,30 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
125
186
|
getConfig() {
|
|
126
187
|
return this.config;
|
|
127
188
|
}
|
|
189
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
190
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber);
|
|
191
|
+
}
|
|
192
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
193
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber);
|
|
194
|
+
}
|
|
128
195
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
129
196
|
this.config = {
|
|
130
197
|
...this.config,
|
|
131
198
|
...config
|
|
132
199
|
};
|
|
200
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
202
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
203
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
204
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
205
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
133
206
|
}
|
|
134
207
|
async start() {
|
|
135
208
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
136
209
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
137
210
|
return;
|
|
138
211
|
}
|
|
212
|
+
await this.keyStore.start();
|
|
139
213
|
await this.registerHandlers();
|
|
140
214
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
141
215
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee('now', myAddresses);
|
|
@@ -148,47 +222,79 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
148
222
|
}
|
|
149
223
|
async stop() {
|
|
150
224
|
await this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.stop();
|
|
225
|
+
await this.keyStore.stop();
|
|
151
226
|
}
|
|
152
227
|
/** Register handlers on the p2p client */ async registerHandlers() {
|
|
153
228
|
if (!this.hasRegisteredHandlers) {
|
|
154
229
|
this.hasRegisteredHandlers = true;
|
|
155
230
|
this.log.debug(`Registering validator handlers for p2p client`);
|
|
156
|
-
|
|
157
|
-
this.
|
|
231
|
+
// Block proposal handler - validates but does NOT attest (validators only attest to checkpoints)
|
|
232
|
+
const blockHandler = (block, proposalSender)=>this.validateBlockProposal(block, proposalSender);
|
|
233
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerBlockProposalHandler(blockHandler);
|
|
234
|
+
// Checkpoint proposal handler - validates and creates attestations
|
|
235
|
+
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
236
|
+
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
237
|
+
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
238
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
239
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
240
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
241
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
242
|
+
});
|
|
243
|
+
// Oversized proposal handler - triggers slashing for proposals beyond the per-checkpoint block limit
|
|
244
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerOversizedProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
245
|
+
this.handleOversizedProposal(info);
|
|
246
|
+
});
|
|
247
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
248
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
249
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
250
|
+
});
|
|
251
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
252
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
253
|
+
});
|
|
158
254
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
159
255
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
160
256
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
161
257
|
}
|
|
162
258
|
}
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
259
|
+
/**
|
|
260
|
+
* Validate a block proposal from a peer.
|
|
261
|
+
* Note: Validators do NOT attest to individual blocks - attestations are only for checkpoint proposals.
|
|
262
|
+
* @returns true if the proposal is valid, false otherwise
|
|
263
|
+
*/ async validateBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender) {
|
|
164
264
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
265
|
+
// Note: During escape hatch, we still want to "validate" proposals for observability,
|
|
266
|
+
// but we intentionally reject them and disable slashing invalid block and attestation flow.
|
|
267
|
+
const escapeHatchOpen = await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
165
268
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
166
269
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
167
270
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
168
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
169
|
-
return
|
|
271
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
272
|
+
return false;
|
|
170
273
|
}
|
|
171
|
-
//
|
|
274
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
275
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
276
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
277
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
278
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
279
|
+
});
|
|
280
|
+
}
|
|
281
|
+
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
172
282
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
173
283
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
174
284
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
175
285
|
...proposal.toBlockInfo(),
|
|
176
286
|
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
177
287
|
};
|
|
178
|
-
this.log.info(`Received proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
288
|
+
this.log.info(`Received block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
179
289
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
180
290
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
181
291
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
182
292
|
});
|
|
183
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
185
|
-
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
186
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
187
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals;
|
|
188
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute);
|
|
293
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
294
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
189
295
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
190
|
-
this.log.warn(`Proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
191
296
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
297
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
192
298
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
193
299
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
194
300
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -200,16 +306,83 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
200
306
|
if (badProposalReasons.includes(reason)) {
|
|
201
307
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsBadProposal(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
202
308
|
} else {
|
|
203
|
-
// Node issues so we can't
|
|
309
|
+
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
204
310
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
205
311
|
}
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
312
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
313
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
314
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
315
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
316
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
317
|
+
});
|
|
209
318
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
319
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
210
320
|
}
|
|
321
|
+
return false;
|
|
322
|
+
}
|
|
323
|
+
this.log.info(`Validated block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
324
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
325
|
+
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
326
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false,
|
|
327
|
+
escapeHatchOpen
|
|
328
|
+
});
|
|
329
|
+
if (escapeHatchOpen) {
|
|
330
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
331
|
+
return false;
|
|
332
|
+
}
|
|
333
|
+
return true;
|
|
334
|
+
}
|
|
335
|
+
/**
|
|
336
|
+
* Validate and attest to a checkpoint proposal from a peer.
|
|
337
|
+
* The proposal is received as CheckpointProposalCore (without lastBlock) since
|
|
338
|
+
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
339
|
+
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
340
|
+
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
341
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
342
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
343
|
+
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
344
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
345
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
346
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
347
|
+
}
|
|
348
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
349
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
211
350
|
return undefined;
|
|
212
351
|
}
|
|
352
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
353
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
354
|
+
this.log.debug(`Not attesting to block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
355
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
356
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
357
|
+
});
|
|
358
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
359
|
+
}
|
|
360
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
361
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
362
|
+
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
363
|
+
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
364
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
365
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
366
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
367
|
+
};
|
|
368
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
369
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
370
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
371
|
+
});
|
|
372
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
373
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
374
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
375
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
376
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
377
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
378
|
+
} else {
|
|
379
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
380
|
+
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
381
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
382
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
383
|
+
}
|
|
384
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
385
|
+
}
|
|
213
386
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
214
387
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
215
388
|
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
@@ -217,13 +390,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
217
390
|
return undefined;
|
|
218
391
|
}
|
|
219
392
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
220
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} proposal for slot ${
|
|
393
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
221
394
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
222
395
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
223
396
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
224
397
|
});
|
|
225
398
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
226
|
-
//
|
|
399
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
400
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
401
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
402
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
403
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
404
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
405
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
406
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
407
|
+
}
|
|
408
|
+
}
|
|
227
409
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
228
410
|
let attestors;
|
|
229
411
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -240,13 +422,66 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
240
422
|
}
|
|
241
423
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
242
424
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
243
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating attestations for
|
|
425
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
244
426
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
245
427
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
246
428
|
});
|
|
247
429
|
return undefined;
|
|
248
430
|
}
|
|
249
|
-
return this.
|
|
431
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
432
|
+
}
|
|
433
|
+
/**
|
|
434
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
435
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
436
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
437
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
438
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
439
|
+
return true;
|
|
440
|
+
}
|
|
441
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
442
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
444
|
+
return false;
|
|
445
|
+
}
|
|
446
|
+
return true;
|
|
447
|
+
}
|
|
448
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
449
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
450
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
451
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
452
|
+
}
|
|
453
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
454
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
455
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
456
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
457
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
458
|
+
}
|
|
459
|
+
/**
|
|
460
|
+
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
461
|
+
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
462
|
+
try {
|
|
463
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
464
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
465
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
466
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
467
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
468
|
+
return;
|
|
469
|
+
}
|
|
470
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
471
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
472
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
473
|
+
return;
|
|
474
|
+
}
|
|
475
|
+
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
476
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
477
|
+
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
478
|
+
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
479
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
480
|
+
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
481
|
+
});
|
|
482
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
483
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
484
|
+
}
|
|
250
485
|
}
|
|
251
486
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
252
487
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
@@ -255,11 +490,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
255
490
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
256
491
|
return;
|
|
257
492
|
}
|
|
258
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
259
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
260
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
261
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
262
|
-
}
|
|
263
493
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
264
494
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
265
495
|
{
|
|
@@ -270,69 +500,242 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
270
500
|
}
|
|
271
501
|
]);
|
|
272
502
|
}
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
274
|
-
if (
|
|
275
|
-
|
|
276
|
-
|
|
503
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
504
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
505
|
+
return;
|
|
506
|
+
}
|
|
507
|
+
// The slot is already marked invalid by the all-nodes checkpoint handler that invokes this callback,
|
|
508
|
+
// so we only emit the proposer slash event here.
|
|
509
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
510
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
511
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
512
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
513
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
514
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
515
|
+
});
|
|
516
|
+
}
|
|
517
|
+
}
|
|
518
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
519
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
520
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
521
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
522
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
523
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
524
|
+
});
|
|
525
|
+
return false;
|
|
526
|
+
}
|
|
527
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
528
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
529
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
530
|
+
return false;
|
|
531
|
+
}
|
|
532
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
533
|
+
{
|
|
534
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
535
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
536
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
537
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
538
|
+
}
|
|
539
|
+
]);
|
|
540
|
+
return true;
|
|
541
|
+
}
|
|
542
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
543
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
544
|
+
}
|
|
545
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
546
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
547
|
+
if (!this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) || this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber)) {
|
|
548
|
+
return;
|
|
549
|
+
}
|
|
550
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
551
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
552
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
553
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
554
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
555
|
+
});
|
|
556
|
+
return;
|
|
557
|
+
}
|
|
558
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
559
|
+
}
|
|
560
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
561
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
562
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
563
|
+
return;
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
565
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
566
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
567
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
568
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
569
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
570
|
+
});
|
|
571
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
572
|
+
{
|
|
573
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
574
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
575
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
576
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
577
|
+
}
|
|
578
|
+
]);
|
|
579
|
+
}
|
|
580
|
+
/**
|
|
581
|
+
* Handle detection of an oversized block proposal: one whose index within its checkpoint lands at or
|
|
582
|
+
* beyond the consensus per-checkpoint block limit. A single signed proposal at an illegal index is
|
|
583
|
+
* self-contained evidence, so emit an invalid-block-proposal slash event for the proposer, deduped per
|
|
584
|
+
* (proposer, slot) since the p2p layer reports every oversized proposal it stores.
|
|
585
|
+
*/ handleOversizedProposal(info) {
|
|
586
|
+
const { slot, proposer } = info;
|
|
587
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL;
|
|
588
|
+
if (!this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(`${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${slot}`)) {
|
|
589
|
+
return;
|
|
277
590
|
}
|
|
278
|
-
|
|
591
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected oversized block proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
592
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
593
|
+
slot,
|
|
594
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
595
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(offenseType)
|
|
596
|
+
});
|
|
597
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
598
|
+
{
|
|
599
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
600
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
601
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
602
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
603
|
+
}
|
|
604
|
+
]);
|
|
605
|
+
}
|
|
606
|
+
/**
|
|
607
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
608
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
609
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
610
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
611
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markProposalEquivocation(slot);
|
|
612
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
613
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
614
|
+
slot,
|
|
615
|
+
type,
|
|
616
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
617
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
618
|
+
});
|
|
619
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
620
|
+
{
|
|
621
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
622
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
623
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
624
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
625
|
+
}
|
|
626
|
+
]);
|
|
627
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
628
|
+
{
|
|
629
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
630
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
631
|
+
}
|
|
632
|
+
]);
|
|
633
|
+
}
|
|
634
|
+
/**
|
|
635
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
636
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
637
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
638
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
639
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
640
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
641
|
+
slot,
|
|
642
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
643
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
644
|
+
});
|
|
645
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
646
|
+
{
|
|
647
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
648
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
649
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
650
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
651
|
+
}
|
|
652
|
+
]);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
654
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
655
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
656
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
657
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
658
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
659
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
660
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
661
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
662
|
+
}
|
|
663
|
+
}
|
|
664
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
665
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
279
666
|
...options,
|
|
280
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
667
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
281
668
|
});
|
|
282
|
-
this.
|
|
669
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
670
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
671
|
+
}
|
|
672
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
673
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
674
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
675
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
676
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
677
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
678
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
679
|
+
}
|
|
680
|
+
}
|
|
681
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
682
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
683
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
684
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
685
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
686
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
687
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
688
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
689
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
690
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
283
691
|
return newProposal;
|
|
284
692
|
}
|
|
285
693
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
286
694
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
287
695
|
}
|
|
288
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer) {
|
|
289
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer);
|
|
696
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
697
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
290
698
|
}
|
|
291
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
292
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
699
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
700
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
293
701
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
294
702
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
295
703
|
inCommittee
|
|
296
704
|
});
|
|
297
|
-
const attestations = await this.
|
|
705
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
706
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
707
|
+
return [];
|
|
708
|
+
}
|
|
298
709
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
299
710
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
300
711
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
301
|
-
void this.p2pClient.
|
|
712
|
+
void this.p2pClient.broadcastCheckpointAttestations(attestations).catch((err)=>{
|
|
302
713
|
this.log.error(`Failed to broadcast self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, err);
|
|
303
714
|
});
|
|
304
715
|
return attestations;
|
|
305
716
|
}
|
|
306
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
307
|
-
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this
|
|
308
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
717
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
718
|
+
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
719
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
309
720
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
310
721
|
if (+deadline < this.dateProvider.now()) {
|
|
311
722
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
312
723
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
313
724
|
}
|
|
314
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
315
|
-
const
|
|
725
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
726
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
316
727
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
317
728
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
318
729
|
while(true){
|
|
319
|
-
//
|
|
320
|
-
//
|
|
321
|
-
|
|
322
|
-
|
|
323
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched payload from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
324
|
-
attestationPayload: attestation.payload,
|
|
325
|
-
proposalPayload: proposal.payload
|
|
326
|
-
});
|
|
327
|
-
return false;
|
|
328
|
-
}
|
|
329
|
-
return true;
|
|
330
|
-
});
|
|
730
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
731
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
732
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
733
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
331
734
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
332
735
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
333
736
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
334
737
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
335
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
738
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
336
739
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
337
740
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
338
741
|
continue;
|
|
@@ -354,11 +757,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
354
757
|
await sleep(this.config.attestationPollingIntervalMs);
|
|
355
758
|
}
|
|
356
759
|
}
|
|
357
|
-
async createBlockAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
358
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
359
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addAttestations(attestations);
|
|
360
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
361
|
-
}
|
|
362
760
|
async handleAuthRequest(peer, msg) {
|
|
363
761
|
const authRequest = AuthRequest.fromBuffer(msg);
|
|
364
762
|
const statusMessage = await this.p2pClient.handleAuthRequestFromPeer(authRequest, peer).catch((_)=>undefined);
|
|
@@ -373,7 +771,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
373
771
|
return Buffer.alloc(0);
|
|
374
772
|
}
|
|
375
773
|
const payloadToSign = authRequest.getPayloadToSign();
|
|
376
|
-
|
|
774
|
+
// AUTH_REQUEST doesn't require HA protection - multiple signatures are safe
|
|
775
|
+
const context = {
|
|
776
|
+
dutyType: DutyType.AUTH_REQUEST
|
|
777
|
+
};
|
|
778
|
+
const signature = await this.keyStore.signMessageWithAddress(addressToUse, payloadToSign, context);
|
|
377
779
|
const authResponse = new AuthResponse(statusMessage, signature);
|
|
378
780
|
return authResponse.toBuffer();
|
|
379
781
|
}
|