@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.bf2612ae → 0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +21 -18
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +20 -34
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +13 -11
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +50 -30
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +7 -4
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +3 -3
- package/dest/index.d.ts +1 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +0 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +2 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +4 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +34 -5
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +33 -9
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +167 -44
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +29 -48
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +73 -29
- package/src/config.ts +7 -4
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +9 -2
- package/src/index.ts +0 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +2 -2
- package/src/metrics.ts +45 -6
- package/src/validator.ts +221 -53
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -18
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -135
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { validateFeeAssetPriceModifier } from '@aztec/ethereum/contracts';
|
|
3
|
+
import { BlockNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
4
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
5
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
6
|
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
@@ -8,7 +9,7 @@ import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
|
8
9
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
10
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
11
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
|
-
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
13
|
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
13
14
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
15
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
41
42
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
42
43
|
config;
|
|
43
44
|
blobClient;
|
|
45
|
+
haSigner;
|
|
44
46
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
47
|
tracer;
|
|
46
48
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,17 +50,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
50
|
log;
|
|
49
51
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
52
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
54
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
55
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
56
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
55
57
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
validatedBlockSlots;
|
|
60
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
61
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set(), this.validatedBlockSlots = new Set();
|
|
58
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
59
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, haSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.haSigner = haSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
62
61
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
63
62
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
64
63
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -118,17 +117,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
118
117
|
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
119
118
|
});
|
|
120
119
|
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
120
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
121
|
+
let validatorKeyStore = nodeKeystoreAdapter;
|
|
122
|
+
let haSigner;
|
|
122
123
|
if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
123
124
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
124
125
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
125
126
|
...config,
|
|
126
127
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
127
128
|
};
|
|
128
|
-
const { signer } = await createHASigner(haConfig
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
129
|
+
const { signer } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
130
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
131
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
132
|
+
});
|
|
133
|
+
haSigner = signer;
|
|
134
|
+
validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, signer);
|
|
130
135
|
}
|
|
131
|
-
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
136
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, haSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
132
137
|
return validator;
|
|
133
138
|
}
|
|
134
139
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -155,6 +160,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
155
160
|
...config
|
|
156
161
|
};
|
|
157
162
|
}
|
|
163
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
164
|
+
if (this.config.haSigningEnabled && !this.haSigner) {
|
|
165
|
+
this.log.warn('HA signing is enabled in config but was not initialized at startup. ' + 'Restart the node to enable HA signing.');
|
|
166
|
+
} else if (!this.config.haSigningEnabled && this.haSigner) {
|
|
167
|
+
this.log.warn('HA signing was disabled via config update but the HA signer is still active. ' + 'Restart the node to fully disable HA signing.');
|
|
168
|
+
}
|
|
169
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
170
|
+
if (this.haSigner) {
|
|
171
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.haSigner);
|
|
172
|
+
} else {
|
|
173
|
+
this.keyStore = newAdapter;
|
|
174
|
+
}
|
|
175
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
176
|
+
}
|
|
158
177
|
async start() {
|
|
159
178
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
160
179
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
@@ -187,6 +206,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
187
206
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
188
207
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
189
208
|
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
209
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
210
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
211
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
212
|
+
});
|
|
213
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
214
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
215
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
216
|
+
});
|
|
190
217
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
191
218
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
192
219
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -207,6 +234,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
207
234
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
208
235
|
return false;
|
|
209
236
|
}
|
|
237
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
238
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
239
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
240
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
241
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
242
|
+
});
|
|
243
|
+
return false;
|
|
244
|
+
}
|
|
210
245
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
211
246
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
212
247
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -258,9 +293,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
258
293
|
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
259
294
|
return false;
|
|
260
295
|
}
|
|
261
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): Remove this once checkpoint validation is stable.
|
|
262
|
-
// Track that we successfully validated a block for this slot, so we can attest to checkpoint proposals for it.
|
|
263
|
-
this.validatedBlockSlots.add(slotNumber);
|
|
264
296
|
return true;
|
|
265
297
|
}
|
|
266
298
|
/**
|
|
@@ -281,6 +313,19 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
281
313
|
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
282
314
|
return undefined;
|
|
283
315
|
}
|
|
316
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
317
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
318
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
319
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
320
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
321
|
+
});
|
|
322
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
323
|
+
}
|
|
324
|
+
// Validate fee asset price modifier is within allowed range
|
|
325
|
+
if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
326
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
327
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
328
|
+
}
|
|
284
329
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
285
330
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
286
331
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -295,16 +340,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
295
340
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
296
341
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
297
342
|
});
|
|
298
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): Remove this once checkpoint validation is stable.
|
|
299
|
-
// Check that we have successfully validated a block for this slot before attesting to the checkpoint.
|
|
300
|
-
if (!this.validatedBlockSlots.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
301
|
-
this.log.warn(`No validated block found for slot ${slotNumber}, refusing to attest to checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
302
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
303
|
-
}
|
|
304
343
|
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
|
|
307
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
344
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
345
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
308
346
|
} else {
|
|
309
347
|
const validationResult = await this.validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
310
348
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
@@ -351,11 +389,32 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
351
389
|
});
|
|
352
390
|
return undefined;
|
|
353
391
|
}
|
|
354
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
392
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
393
|
+
}
|
|
394
|
+
/**
|
|
395
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
396
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
397
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
398
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
399
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
400
|
+
return true;
|
|
401
|
+
}
|
|
402
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
403
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
404
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
405
|
+
return false;
|
|
406
|
+
}
|
|
407
|
+
return true;
|
|
355
408
|
}
|
|
356
409
|
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
410
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
411
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
412
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
413
|
+
}
|
|
357
414
|
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
358
|
-
|
|
415
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
416
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
417
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
359
418
|
return attestations;
|
|
360
419
|
}
|
|
361
420
|
/**
|
|
@@ -363,7 +422,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
363
422
|
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
364
423
|
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
365
424
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
366
|
-
|
|
425
|
+
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
426
|
+
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
427
|
+
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
428
|
+
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
367
429
|
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
368
430
|
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
369
431
|
try {
|
|
@@ -401,6 +463,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
401
463
|
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
402
464
|
};
|
|
403
465
|
}
|
|
466
|
+
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
467
|
+
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
468
|
+
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
469
|
+
return {
|
|
470
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
471
|
+
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
472
|
+
};
|
|
473
|
+
}
|
|
404
474
|
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
405
475
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
406
476
|
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
@@ -411,18 +481,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
411
481
|
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
412
482
|
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
413
483
|
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
414
|
-
//
|
|
415
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
416
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
484
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
417
485
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
418
|
-
const
|
|
419
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
486
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
420
487
|
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
421
488
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
422
489
|
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
423
490
|
try {
|
|
424
491
|
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
425
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks);
|
|
492
|
+
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
426
493
|
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
427
494
|
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
428
495
|
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
@@ -486,6 +553,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
486
553
|
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
487
554
|
version: gv.version,
|
|
488
555
|
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
556
|
+
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
489
557
|
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
490
558
|
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
491
559
|
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
@@ -506,7 +574,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
506
574
|
return;
|
|
507
575
|
}
|
|
508
576
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
509
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
577
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
510
578
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
511
579
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
512
580
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -538,23 +606,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
538
606
|
}
|
|
539
607
|
]);
|
|
540
608
|
}
|
|
609
|
+
/**
|
|
610
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
611
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
612
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
613
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
614
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
615
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
616
|
+
slot,
|
|
617
|
+
type
|
|
618
|
+
});
|
|
619
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
620
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
621
|
+
{
|
|
622
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
623
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
624
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
625
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
626
|
+
}
|
|
627
|
+
]);
|
|
628
|
+
}
|
|
629
|
+
/**
|
|
630
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
631
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
632
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
633
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
634
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
635
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
636
|
+
slot
|
|
637
|
+
});
|
|
638
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
639
|
+
{
|
|
640
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
641
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
642
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
643
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
644
|
+
}
|
|
645
|
+
]);
|
|
646
|
+
}
|
|
541
647
|
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
542
|
-
//
|
|
543
|
-
|
|
544
|
-
|
|
545
|
-
|
|
546
|
-
|
|
648
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
649
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
650
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
651
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
652
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
653
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
654
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
655
|
+
}
|
|
656
|
+
}
|
|
547
657
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
548
658
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
549
659
|
...options,
|
|
550
660
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
551
661
|
});
|
|
552
|
-
this.
|
|
662
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
553
663
|
return newProposal;
|
|
554
664
|
}
|
|
555
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
665
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
666
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
667
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
668
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
669
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
670
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
671
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
672
|
+
}
|
|
673
|
+
}
|
|
556
674
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
557
|
-
|
|
675
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
676
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
677
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
558
678
|
}
|
|
559
679
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
560
680
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
@@ -569,6 +689,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
569
689
|
inCommittee
|
|
570
690
|
});
|
|
571
691
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
692
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
693
|
+
return [];
|
|
694
|
+
}
|
|
572
695
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
573
696
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
574
697
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,30 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
-
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
90
|
-
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.c0b82b2",
|
|
91
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
92
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
93
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM } from '@aztec/constants';
|
|
2
2
|
import type { EpochCache } from '@aztec/epoch-cache';
|
|
3
3
|
import { BlockNumber, CheckpointNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
4
|
-
import { chunkBy } from '@aztec/foundation/collection';
|
|
5
4
|
import { Fr } from '@aztec/foundation/curves/bn254';
|
|
6
5
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
7
6
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
@@ -9,16 +8,12 @@ import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
|
9
8
|
import { DateProvider, Timer } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
10
9
|
import type { P2P, PeerId } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
11
10
|
import { BlockProposalValidator } from '@aztec/p2p/msg_validators';
|
|
12
|
-
import type { L2Block, L2BlockSink, L2BlockSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/block';
|
|
11
|
+
import type { BlockData, L2Block, L2BlockSink, L2BlockSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/block';
|
|
13
12
|
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
14
13
|
import type { ITxProvider, ValidatorClientFullConfig, WorldStateSynchronizer } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
|
|
15
|
-
import {
|
|
16
|
-
type L1ToL2MessageSource,
|
|
17
|
-
computeCheckpointOutHash,
|
|
18
|
-
computeInHashFromL1ToL2Messages,
|
|
19
|
-
} from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
14
|
+
import { type L1ToL2MessageSource, computeInHashFromL1ToL2Messages } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
20
15
|
import type { BlockProposal } from '@aztec/stdlib/p2p';
|
|
21
|
-
import {
|
|
16
|
+
import type { CheckpointGlobalVariables, FailedTx, Tx } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
|
|
22
17
|
import {
|
|
23
18
|
ReExFailedTxsError,
|
|
24
19
|
ReExStateMismatchError,
|
|
@@ -153,16 +148,16 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
153
148
|
}
|
|
154
149
|
|
|
155
150
|
// Check that the parent proposal is a block we know, otherwise reexecution would fail
|
|
156
|
-
const
|
|
157
|
-
if (
|
|
151
|
+
const parentBlock = await this.getParentBlock(proposal);
|
|
152
|
+
if (parentBlock === undefined) {
|
|
158
153
|
this.log.warn(`Parent block for proposal not found, skipping processing`, proposalInfo);
|
|
159
154
|
return { isValid: false, reason: 'parent_block_not_found' };
|
|
160
155
|
}
|
|
161
156
|
|
|
162
157
|
// Check that the parent block's slot is not greater than the proposal's slot.
|
|
163
|
-
if (
|
|
158
|
+
if (parentBlock !== 'genesis' && parentBlock.header.getSlot() > slotNumber) {
|
|
164
159
|
this.log.warn(`Parent block slot is greater than proposal slot, skipping processing`, {
|
|
165
|
-
parentBlockSlot:
|
|
160
|
+
parentBlockSlot: parentBlock.header.getSlot().toString(),
|
|
166
161
|
proposalSlot: slotNumber.toString(),
|
|
167
162
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
168
163
|
});
|
|
@@ -171,9 +166,9 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
171
166
|
|
|
172
167
|
// Compute the block number based on the parent block
|
|
173
168
|
const blockNumber =
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
169
|
+
parentBlock === 'genesis'
|
|
175
170
|
? BlockNumber(INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM)
|
|
176
|
-
: BlockNumber(
|
|
171
|
+
: BlockNumber(parentBlock.header.getBlockNumber() + 1);
|
|
177
172
|
|
|
178
173
|
// Check that this block number does not exist already
|
|
179
174
|
const existingBlock = await this.blockSource.getBlockHeader(blockNumber);
|
|
@@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
190
185
|
});
|
|
191
186
|
|
|
192
187
|
// Compute the checkpoint number for this block and validate checkpoint consistency
|
|
193
|
-
const checkpointResult =
|
|
188
|
+
const checkpointResult = this.computeCheckpointNumber(proposal, parentBlock, proposalInfo);
|
|
194
189
|
if (checkpointResult.reason) {
|
|
195
190
|
return { isValid: false, blockNumber, reason: checkpointResult.reason };
|
|
196
191
|
}
|
|
@@ -218,17 +213,11 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
218
213
|
// Try re-executing the transactions in the proposal if needed
|
|
219
214
|
let reexecutionResult;
|
|
220
215
|
if (shouldReexecute) {
|
|
221
|
-
//
|
|
222
|
-
// TODO(leila/mbps): There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out
|
|
223
|
-
// hashes without having to fetch all the blocks.
|
|
216
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
224
217
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
225
|
-
const
|
|
226
|
-
.filter(
|
|
227
|
-
.
|
|
228
|
-
const blocksByCheckpoint = chunkBy(checkpointedBlocks, b => b.checkpointNumber);
|
|
229
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = blocksByCheckpoint.map(checkpointBlocks =>
|
|
230
|
-
computeCheckpointOutHash(checkpointBlocks.map(b => b.block.body.txEffects.map(tx => tx.l2ToL1Msgs))),
|
|
231
|
-
);
|
|
218
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch))
|
|
219
|
+
.filter(c => c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber)
|
|
220
|
+
.map(c => c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
232
221
|
|
|
233
222
|
try {
|
|
234
223
|
this.log.verbose(`Re-executing transactions in the proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -260,7 +249,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
260
249
|
return { isValid: true, blockNumber, reexecutionResult };
|
|
261
250
|
}
|
|
262
251
|
|
|
263
|
-
private async getParentBlock(proposal: BlockProposal): Promise<'genesis' |
|
|
252
|
+
private async getParentBlock(proposal: BlockProposal): Promise<'genesis' | BlockData | undefined> {
|
|
264
253
|
const parentArchive = proposal.blockHeader.lastArchive.root;
|
|
265
254
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
266
255
|
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
@@ -276,12 +265,11 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
276
265
|
|
|
277
266
|
try {
|
|
278
267
|
return (
|
|
279
|
-
(await this.blockSource.
|
|
268
|
+
(await this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(parentArchive)) ??
|
|
280
269
|
(timeoutDurationMs <= 0
|
|
281
270
|
? undefined
|
|
282
271
|
: await retryUntil(
|
|
283
|
-
() =>
|
|
284
|
-
this.blockSource.syncImmediate().then(() => this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(parentArchive)),
|
|
272
|
+
() => this.blockSource.syncImmediate().then(() => this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(parentArchive)),
|
|
285
273
|
'force archiver sync',
|
|
286
274
|
timeoutDurationMs / 1000,
|
|
287
275
|
0.5,
|
|
@@ -297,12 +285,12 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
297
285
|
}
|
|
298
286
|
}
|
|
299
287
|
|
|
300
|
-
private
|
|
288
|
+
private computeCheckpointNumber(
|
|
301
289
|
proposal: BlockProposal,
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
290
|
+
parentBlock: 'genesis' | BlockData,
|
|
303
291
|
proposalInfo: object,
|
|
304
|
-
):
|
|
305
|
-
if (
|
|
292
|
+
): CheckpointComputationResult {
|
|
293
|
+
if (parentBlock === 'genesis') {
|
|
306
294
|
// First block is in checkpoint 1
|
|
307
295
|
if (proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint !== 0) {
|
|
308
296
|
this.log.warn(`First block proposal has non-zero indexWithinCheckpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -311,19 +299,9 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
311
299
|
return { checkpointNumber: CheckpointNumber.INITIAL };
|
|
312
300
|
}
|
|
313
301
|
|
|
314
|
-
// Get the parent block to find its checkpoint number
|
|
315
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): The block header should include the checkpoint number to avoid this lookup,
|
|
316
|
-
// or at least the L2BlockSource should return a different struct that includes it.
|
|
317
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = parentBlockHeader.getBlockNumber();
|
|
318
|
-
const parentBlock = await this.blockSource.getL2Block(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
319
|
-
if (!parentBlock) {
|
|
320
|
-
this.log.warn(`Parent block ${parentBlockNumber} not found in archiver`, proposalInfo);
|
|
321
|
-
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
322
|
-
}
|
|
323
|
-
|
|
324
302
|
if (proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint === 0) {
|
|
325
303
|
// If this is the first block in a new checkpoint, increment the checkpoint number
|
|
326
|
-
if (!(proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() >
|
|
304
|
+
if (!(proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() > parentBlock.header.getSlot())) {
|
|
327
305
|
this.log.warn(`Slot should be greater than parent block slot for first block in checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
328
306
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
329
307
|
}
|
|
@@ -335,7 +313,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
335
313
|
this.log.warn(`Non-sequential indexWithinCheckpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
336
314
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
337
315
|
}
|
|
338
|
-
if (proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() !==
|
|
316
|
+
if (proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() !== parentBlock.header.getSlot()) {
|
|
339
317
|
this.log.warn(`Slot should be equal to parent block slot for non-first block in checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
340
318
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
341
319
|
}
|
|
@@ -356,7 +334,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
356
334
|
*/
|
|
357
335
|
private validateNonFirstBlockInCheckpoint(
|
|
358
336
|
proposal: BlockProposal,
|
|
359
|
-
parentBlock:
|
|
337
|
+
parentBlock: BlockData,
|
|
360
338
|
proposalInfo: object,
|
|
361
339
|
): CheckpointComputationResult | undefined {
|
|
362
340
|
const proposalGlobals = proposal.blockHeader.globalVariables;
|
|
@@ -475,13 +453,14 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
475
453
|
// Fork before the block to be built
|
|
476
454
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(blockNumber - 1);
|
|
477
455
|
await this.worldState.syncImmediate(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
478
|
-
using fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
456
|
+
await using fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
479
457
|
|
|
480
|
-
// Build checkpoint constants from proposal (excludes blockNumber
|
|
458
|
+
// Build checkpoint constants from proposal (excludes blockNumber which is per-block)
|
|
481
459
|
const constants: CheckpointGlobalVariables = {
|
|
482
460
|
chainId: new Fr(config.l1ChainId),
|
|
483
461
|
version: new Fr(config.rollupVersion),
|
|
484
462
|
slotNumber: slot,
|
|
463
|
+
timestamp: blockHeader.globalVariables.timestamp,
|
|
485
464
|
coinbase: blockHeader.globalVariables.coinbase,
|
|
486
465
|
feeRecipient: blockHeader.globalVariables.feeRecipient,
|
|
487
466
|
gasFees: blockHeader.globalVariables.gasFees,
|
|
@@ -491,10 +470,12 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
491
470
|
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(
|
|
492
471
|
checkpointNumber,
|
|
493
472
|
constants,
|
|
473
|
+
0n, // only takes effect in the following checkpoint.
|
|
494
474
|
l1ToL2Messages,
|
|
495
475
|
previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
496
476
|
fork,
|
|
497
477
|
priorBlocks,
|
|
478
|
+
this.log.getBindings(),
|
|
498
479
|
);
|
|
499
480
|
|
|
500
481
|
// Build the new block
|