@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.a072138 → 0.0.1-commit.a5db02d
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +63 -18
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +21 -8
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +126 -46
- package/dest/config.d.ts +9 -3
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +45 -7
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +33 -45
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +10 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +19 -6
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -3
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -2
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +3 -3
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +32 -41
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +14 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +24 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +165 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1207 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +65 -24
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +376 -233
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +144 -39
- package/src/config.ts +53 -9
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +59 -54
- package/src/factory.ts +29 -4
- package/src/index.ts +1 -2
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +3 -3
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +43 -59
- package/src/metrics.ts +37 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1314 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +509 -277
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -63
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -546
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -19
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -555
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -154
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,46 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
3
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
4
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
6
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
7
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
8
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
10
|
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
-
import {
|
|
11
|
+
import { ConsensusTimetable } from '@aztec/stdlib/timetable';
|
|
13
12
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
13
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
15
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
14
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
16
15
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
17
16
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
18
|
-
import {
|
|
17
|
+
import { DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS } from './config.js';
|
|
19
18
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
20
19
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
21
20
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
22
21
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
22
|
+
import { ProposalHandler, SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT, SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
23
23
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
24
24
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
25
25
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
const
|
|
28
|
-
'state_mismatch',
|
|
29
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
30
|
-
];
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
27
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
31
28
|
/**
|
|
32
29
|
* Validator Client
|
|
33
30
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
34
31
|
keyStore;
|
|
35
32
|
epochCache;
|
|
36
33
|
p2pClient;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
38
35
|
blockSource;
|
|
39
36
|
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
40
37
|
worldState;
|
|
41
38
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
42
39
|
config;
|
|
43
40
|
blobClient;
|
|
41
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
44
42
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
43
|
tracer;
|
|
46
44
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,18 +46,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
46
|
log;
|
|
49
47
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
48
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
49
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
50
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
51
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
52
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
53
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
55
54
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
55
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
56
|
+
oversizedProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
57
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
58
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
59
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS);
|
|
58
61
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
59
62
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
60
63
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
61
64
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
62
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
65
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
66
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
63
67
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
64
68
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
65
69
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -93,6 +97,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
93
97
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
94
98
|
return;
|
|
95
99
|
}
|
|
100
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
96
101
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
97
102
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
98
103
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -108,34 +113,70 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
108
113
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
109
114
|
}
|
|
110
115
|
}
|
|
111
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
116
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
112
117
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
113
|
-
const
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
118
|
+
const consensusTimetable = new ConsensusTimetable({
|
|
119
|
+
l1Constants: epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
120
|
+
blockDuration: config.blockDurationMs / 1000
|
|
115
121
|
});
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
122
|
+
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, consensusTimetable, {
|
|
123
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
124
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
125
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
126
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
127
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
128
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
129
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
130
|
+
},
|
|
131
|
+
clockDisparityMs: config.maxGossipClockDisparityMs ?? DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS
|
|
132
|
+
});
|
|
133
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, consensusTimetable, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
134
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
135
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
136
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
137
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
138
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
139
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
140
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
141
|
+
}));
|
|
142
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
143
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
119
144
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
120
145
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
121
146
|
...config,
|
|
122
147
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
123
148
|
};
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
149
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
150
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
151
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
152
|
+
}));
|
|
153
|
+
} else {
|
|
154
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
155
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
156
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
157
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
158
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
159
|
+
}));
|
|
126
160
|
}
|
|
127
|
-
const
|
|
161
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
162
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
128
163
|
return validator;
|
|
129
164
|
}
|
|
130
165
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
131
166
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
132
167
|
}
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
return this.
|
|
168
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
169
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
135
170
|
}
|
|
136
171
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
137
172
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
138
173
|
}
|
|
174
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
175
|
+
return {
|
|
176
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
177
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
178
|
+
};
|
|
179
|
+
}
|
|
139
180
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
140
181
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
141
182
|
}
|
|
@@ -145,11 +186,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
145
186
|
getConfig() {
|
|
146
187
|
return this.config;
|
|
147
188
|
}
|
|
189
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
190
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber);
|
|
191
|
+
}
|
|
192
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
193
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber);
|
|
194
|
+
}
|
|
148
195
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
149
196
|
this.config = {
|
|
150
197
|
...this.config,
|
|
151
198
|
...config
|
|
152
199
|
};
|
|
200
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
202
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
203
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
204
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
205
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
153
206
|
}
|
|
154
207
|
async start() {
|
|
155
208
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
@@ -182,7 +235,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
182
235
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
183
236
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
184
237
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
185
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
238
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
239
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
240
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
241
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
242
|
+
});
|
|
243
|
+
// Oversized proposal handler - triggers slashing for proposals beyond the per-checkpoint block limit
|
|
244
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerOversizedProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
245
|
+
this.handleOversizedProposal(info);
|
|
246
|
+
});
|
|
247
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
248
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
249
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
250
|
+
});
|
|
251
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
252
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
253
|
+
});
|
|
186
254
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
187
255
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
188
256
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -203,6 +271,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
203
271
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
204
272
|
return false;
|
|
205
273
|
}
|
|
274
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
275
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
276
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
277
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
278
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
279
|
+
});
|
|
280
|
+
}
|
|
206
281
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
207
282
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
208
283
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -215,14 +290,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
215
290
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
216
291
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
217
292
|
});
|
|
218
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
221
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
222
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
293
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
294
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
223
295
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
224
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
225
296
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
297
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
226
298
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
227
299
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
228
300
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -237,10 +309,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
237
309
|
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
238
310
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
239
311
|
}
|
|
240
|
-
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
|
|
312
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
313
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
314
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
315
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
316
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
317
|
+
});
|
|
243
318
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
319
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
244
320
|
}
|
|
245
321
|
return false;
|
|
246
322
|
}
|
|
@@ -262,45 +338,50 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
262
338
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
263
339
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
264
340
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
265
|
-
const
|
|
341
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
266
342
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
267
343
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
268
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
269
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
344
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
345
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
270
346
|
return undefined;
|
|
271
347
|
}
|
|
272
|
-
//
|
|
273
|
-
if (!
|
|
274
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
348
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
349
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
275
350
|
return undefined;
|
|
276
351
|
}
|
|
277
|
-
//
|
|
278
|
-
|
|
352
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
353
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
354
|
+
this.log.debug(`Not attesting to block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
355
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
356
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
357
|
+
});
|
|
358
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
359
|
+
}
|
|
360
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
361
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
279
362
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
280
363
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
364
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
282
365
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
283
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
284
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
366
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
285
367
|
};
|
|
286
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
368
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
287
369
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
288
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
289
370
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
290
371
|
});
|
|
291
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
372
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
373
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
374
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
292
375
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
293
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
376
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
377
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
294
378
|
} else {
|
|
295
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
379
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
296
380
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
297
381
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
298
382
|
return undefined;
|
|
299
383
|
}
|
|
300
|
-
|
|
301
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
302
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
303
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
384
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
304
385
|
}
|
|
305
386
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
306
387
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
@@ -309,12 +390,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
309
390
|
return undefined;
|
|
310
391
|
}
|
|
311
392
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
312
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
393
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
313
394
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
314
395
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
315
396
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
316
397
|
});
|
|
317
398
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
399
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
400
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
401
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
402
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
403
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
404
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
405
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
406
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
407
|
+
}
|
|
408
|
+
}
|
|
318
409
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
319
410
|
let attestors;
|
|
320
411
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -331,157 +422,47 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
331
422
|
}
|
|
332
423
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
333
424
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
334
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
425
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
335
426
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
336
427
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
337
428
|
});
|
|
338
429
|
return undefined;
|
|
339
430
|
}
|
|
340
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
341
|
-
}
|
|
342
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
343
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
344
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
345
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
431
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
346
432
|
}
|
|
347
433
|
/**
|
|
348
|
-
*
|
|
349
|
-
* @returns
|
|
350
|
-
*/
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
353
|
-
|
|
354
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
355
|
-
try {
|
|
356
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
357
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
358
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
359
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
360
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
361
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
362
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
363
|
-
return {
|
|
364
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
365
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
366
|
-
};
|
|
367
|
-
}
|
|
368
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
369
|
-
return {
|
|
370
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
371
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
372
|
-
};
|
|
434
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
435
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
436
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
437
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
438
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
439
|
+
return true;
|
|
373
440
|
}
|
|
374
|
-
if
|
|
375
|
-
|
|
376
|
-
|
|
377
|
-
|
|
378
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
379
|
-
};
|
|
380
|
-
}
|
|
381
|
-
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
382
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
383
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
384
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
385
|
-
return {
|
|
386
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
387
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
388
|
-
};
|
|
389
|
-
}
|
|
390
|
-
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
391
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
392
|
-
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
393
|
-
});
|
|
394
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
395
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
396
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
397
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
398
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
399
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
400
|
-
// Compute the previous checkpoint out hashes for the epoch.
|
|
401
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
402
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
403
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
404
|
-
const previousCheckpoints = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsForEpoch(epoch)).filter((b)=>b.number < checkpointNumber).sort((a, b)=>a.number - b.number);
|
|
405
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
406
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
407
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
408
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
409
|
-
try {
|
|
410
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
411
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
412
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
413
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
414
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
415
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
416
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
417
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
418
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
419
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
420
|
-
});
|
|
421
|
-
return {
|
|
422
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
423
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
424
|
-
};
|
|
425
|
-
}
|
|
426
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
427
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
428
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
429
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
430
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
431
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
432
|
-
});
|
|
433
|
-
return {
|
|
434
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
435
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
436
|
-
};
|
|
437
|
-
}
|
|
438
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
439
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
440
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
441
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
442
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
443
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
444
|
-
]);
|
|
445
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
446
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
447
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
448
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
449
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
450
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
451
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
452
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
453
|
-
});
|
|
454
|
-
return {
|
|
455
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
456
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
457
|
-
};
|
|
458
|
-
}
|
|
459
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
460
|
-
return {
|
|
461
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
462
|
-
};
|
|
463
|
-
} finally{
|
|
464
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
441
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
442
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
444
|
+
return false;
|
|
465
445
|
}
|
|
446
|
+
return true;
|
|
466
447
|
}
|
|
467
|
-
|
|
468
|
-
|
|
469
|
-
|
|
470
|
-
|
|
471
|
-
|
|
472
|
-
|
|
473
|
-
|
|
474
|
-
|
|
475
|
-
|
|
476
|
-
|
|
477
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
478
|
-
};
|
|
448
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
449
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
450
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
451
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
452
|
+
}
|
|
453
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
454
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
455
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
456
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
457
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
479
458
|
}
|
|
480
459
|
/**
|
|
481
460
|
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
482
461
|
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
483
462
|
try {
|
|
484
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.
|
|
463
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
464
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
465
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
485
466
|
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
486
467
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
487
468
|
return;
|
|
@@ -492,7 +473,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
492
473
|
return;
|
|
493
474
|
}
|
|
494
475
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
495
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
476
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
496
477
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
497
478
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
498
479
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -509,11 +490,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
509
490
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
510
491
|
return;
|
|
511
492
|
}
|
|
512
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
513
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
514
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
515
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
516
|
-
}
|
|
517
493
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
518
494
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
519
495
|
{
|
|
@@ -524,37 +500,212 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
524
500
|
}
|
|
525
501
|
]);
|
|
526
502
|
}
|
|
527
|
-
|
|
528
|
-
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
|
|
531
|
-
//
|
|
532
|
-
//
|
|
503
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
504
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
505
|
+
return;
|
|
506
|
+
}
|
|
507
|
+
// The slot is already marked invalid by the all-nodes checkpoint handler that invokes this callback,
|
|
508
|
+
// so we only emit the proposer slash event here.
|
|
509
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
510
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
511
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
512
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
513
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
514
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
515
|
+
});
|
|
516
|
+
}
|
|
517
|
+
}
|
|
518
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
519
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
520
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
521
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
522
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
523
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
524
|
+
});
|
|
525
|
+
return false;
|
|
526
|
+
}
|
|
527
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
528
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
529
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
530
|
+
return false;
|
|
531
|
+
}
|
|
532
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
533
|
+
{
|
|
534
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
535
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
536
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
537
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
538
|
+
}
|
|
539
|
+
]);
|
|
540
|
+
return true;
|
|
541
|
+
}
|
|
542
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
543
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
544
|
+
}
|
|
545
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
546
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
547
|
+
if (!this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) || this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber)) {
|
|
548
|
+
return;
|
|
549
|
+
}
|
|
550
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
551
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
552
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
553
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
554
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
555
|
+
});
|
|
556
|
+
return;
|
|
557
|
+
}
|
|
558
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
559
|
+
}
|
|
560
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
561
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
562
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
563
|
+
return;
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
565
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
566
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
567
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
568
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
569
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
570
|
+
});
|
|
571
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
572
|
+
{
|
|
573
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
574
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
575
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
576
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
577
|
+
}
|
|
578
|
+
]);
|
|
579
|
+
}
|
|
580
|
+
/**
|
|
581
|
+
* Handle detection of an oversized block proposal: one whose index within its checkpoint lands at or
|
|
582
|
+
* beyond the consensus per-checkpoint block limit. A single signed proposal at an illegal index is
|
|
583
|
+
* self-contained evidence, so emit an invalid-block-proposal slash event for the proposer, deduped per
|
|
584
|
+
* (proposer, slot) since the p2p layer reports every oversized proposal it stores.
|
|
585
|
+
*/ handleOversizedProposal(info) {
|
|
586
|
+
const { slot, proposer } = info;
|
|
587
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL;
|
|
588
|
+
if (!this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(`${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${slot}`)) {
|
|
589
|
+
return;
|
|
590
|
+
}
|
|
591
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected oversized block proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
592
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
593
|
+
slot,
|
|
594
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
595
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(offenseType)
|
|
596
|
+
});
|
|
597
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
598
|
+
{
|
|
599
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
600
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
601
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
602
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
603
|
+
}
|
|
604
|
+
]);
|
|
605
|
+
}
|
|
606
|
+
/**
|
|
607
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
608
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
609
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
610
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
611
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markProposalEquivocation(slot);
|
|
612
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
613
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
614
|
+
slot,
|
|
615
|
+
type,
|
|
616
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
617
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
618
|
+
});
|
|
619
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
620
|
+
{
|
|
621
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
622
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
623
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
624
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
625
|
+
}
|
|
626
|
+
]);
|
|
627
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
628
|
+
{
|
|
629
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
630
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
631
|
+
}
|
|
632
|
+
]);
|
|
633
|
+
}
|
|
634
|
+
/**
|
|
635
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
636
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
637
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
638
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
639
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
640
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
641
|
+
slot,
|
|
642
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
643
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
644
|
+
});
|
|
645
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
646
|
+
{
|
|
647
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
648
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
649
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
650
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
651
|
+
}
|
|
652
|
+
]);
|
|
653
|
+
}
|
|
654
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
655
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
656
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
657
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
658
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
659
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
660
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
661
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
662
|
+
}
|
|
663
|
+
}
|
|
533
664
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
534
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
665
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
535
666
|
...options,
|
|
536
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
667
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
537
668
|
});
|
|
538
|
-
this.
|
|
669
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
539
670
|
return newProposal;
|
|
540
671
|
}
|
|
541
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive,
|
|
672
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
673
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
674
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
675
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
676
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
677
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
678
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
679
|
+
}
|
|
680
|
+
}
|
|
542
681
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
543
|
-
|
|
682
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
683
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
684
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
685
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
686
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
687
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
688
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
689
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
690
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
691
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
544
692
|
}
|
|
545
693
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
546
694
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
547
695
|
}
|
|
548
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
549
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
696
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
697
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
550
698
|
}
|
|
551
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
699
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
552
700
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
553
701
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
554
702
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
555
703
|
inCommittee
|
|
556
704
|
});
|
|
557
|
-
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
705
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
706
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
707
|
+
return [];
|
|
708
|
+
}
|
|
558
709
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
559
710
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
560
711
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
@@ -563,7 +714,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
563
714
|
});
|
|
564
715
|
return attestations;
|
|
565
716
|
}
|
|
566
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
717
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
567
718
|
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
568
719
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
569
720
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
@@ -571,28 +722,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
571
722
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
572
723
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
573
724
|
}
|
|
574
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
575
|
-
const
|
|
725
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
726
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
576
727
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
577
728
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
578
729
|
while(true){
|
|
579
|
-
//
|
|
580
|
-
//
|
|
581
|
-
|
|
582
|
-
|
|
583
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
584
|
-
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
585
|
-
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
586
|
-
});
|
|
587
|
-
return false;
|
|
588
|
-
}
|
|
589
|
-
return true;
|
|
590
|
-
});
|
|
730
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
731
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
732
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
733
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
591
734
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
592
735
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
593
736
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
594
737
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
595
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
738
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
596
739
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
597
740
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
598
741
|
continue;
|