@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.9ef841308 → 0.0.1-commit.a5db02d
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +12 -9
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +4 -2
- package/dest/config.d.ts +9 -3
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +23 -5
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +32 -38
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +4 -1
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +16 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +32 -41
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +5 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +85 -14
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +518 -167
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +40 -13
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +249 -65
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +4 -2
- package/src/config.ts +31 -7
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +51 -47
- package/src/factory.ts +20 -1
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +43 -59
- package/src/metrics.ts +18 -0
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +605 -198
- package/src/validator.ts +322 -82
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,28 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
1
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
2
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
3
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
4
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
5
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
6
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
7
10
|
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
11
|
+
import { ConsensusTimetable } from '@aztec/stdlib/timetable';
|
|
8
12
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
9
13
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
10
14
|
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
11
15
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
12
16
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
17
|
+
import { DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS } from './config.js';
|
|
13
18
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
14
19
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
15
20
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
16
21
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
17
|
-
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
22
|
+
import { ProposalHandler, SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT, SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
18
23
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
19
24
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
20
25
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
const
|
|
23
|
-
'state_mismatch',
|
|
24
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
25
|
-
];
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
27
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
26
28
|
/**
|
|
27
29
|
* Validator Client
|
|
28
30
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
@@ -30,6 +32,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
30
32
|
epochCache;
|
|
31
33
|
p2pClient;
|
|
32
34
|
proposalHandler;
|
|
35
|
+
blockSource;
|
|
36
|
+
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
37
|
+
worldState;
|
|
38
|
+
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
33
39
|
config;
|
|
34
40
|
blobClient;
|
|
35
41
|
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
@@ -46,14 +52,18 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
46
52
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
47
53
|
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
48
54
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
55
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
56
|
+
oversizedProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
57
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
49
58
|
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
50
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
51
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks =
|
|
59
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS);
|
|
52
61
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
53
62
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
54
63
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
55
64
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
56
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
65
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
66
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
57
67
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
58
68
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
59
69
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -103,13 +113,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
103
113
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
104
114
|
}
|
|
105
115
|
}
|
|
106
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
116
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
107
117
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
108
|
-
const
|
|
118
|
+
const consensusTimetable = new ConsensusTimetable({
|
|
119
|
+
l1Constants: epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
120
|
+
blockDuration: config.blockDurationMs / 1000
|
|
121
|
+
});
|
|
122
|
+
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, consensusTimetable, {
|
|
109
123
|
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
110
|
-
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
124
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
125
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
126
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
127
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
128
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
129
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
130
|
+
},
|
|
131
|
+
clockDisparityMs: config.maxGossipClockDisparityMs ?? DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS
|
|
111
132
|
});
|
|
112
|
-
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
133
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, consensusTimetable, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
113
134
|
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
114
135
|
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
115
136
|
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
@@ -138,7 +159,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
138
159
|
}));
|
|
139
160
|
}
|
|
140
161
|
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
141
|
-
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
162
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
142
163
|
return validator;
|
|
143
164
|
}
|
|
144
165
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -150,6 +171,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
150
171
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
151
172
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
152
173
|
}
|
|
174
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
175
|
+
return {
|
|
176
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
177
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
178
|
+
};
|
|
179
|
+
}
|
|
153
180
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
154
181
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
155
182
|
}
|
|
@@ -159,16 +186,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
159
186
|
getConfig() {
|
|
160
187
|
return this.config;
|
|
161
188
|
}
|
|
189
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
190
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber);
|
|
191
|
+
}
|
|
192
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
193
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber);
|
|
194
|
+
}
|
|
162
195
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
163
196
|
this.config = {
|
|
164
197
|
...this.config,
|
|
165
198
|
...config
|
|
166
199
|
};
|
|
200
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
167
201
|
}
|
|
168
202
|
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
169
203
|
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
170
204
|
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
171
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
205
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
172
206
|
}
|
|
173
207
|
async start() {
|
|
174
208
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
@@ -201,15 +235,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
201
235
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
202
236
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
203
237
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
204
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
238
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
205
239
|
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
206
240
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
207
241
|
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
208
242
|
});
|
|
243
|
+
// Oversized proposal handler - triggers slashing for proposals beyond the per-checkpoint block limit
|
|
244
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerOversizedProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
245
|
+
this.handleOversizedProposal(info);
|
|
246
|
+
});
|
|
209
247
|
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
210
248
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
211
249
|
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
212
250
|
});
|
|
251
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
252
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
253
|
+
});
|
|
213
254
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
214
255
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
215
256
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -249,11 +290,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
249
290
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
250
291
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
251
292
|
});
|
|
252
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
const { slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
255
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n || partOfCommittee || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
256
|
-
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
293
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
294
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
257
295
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
258
296
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
259
297
|
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -271,10 +309,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
271
309
|
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
272
310
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
273
311
|
}
|
|
274
|
-
|
|
275
|
-
|
|
276
|
-
|
|
312
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
313
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
314
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
315
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
316
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
317
|
+
});
|
|
277
318
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
319
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
278
320
|
}
|
|
279
321
|
return false;
|
|
280
322
|
}
|
|
@@ -303,9 +345,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
303
345
|
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
304
346
|
return undefined;
|
|
305
347
|
}
|
|
348
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
349
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
350
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
351
|
+
}
|
|
306
352
|
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
307
353
|
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
308
|
-
this.log.debug(`
|
|
354
|
+
this.log.debug(`Not attesting to block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
309
355
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
310
356
|
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
311
357
|
});
|
|
@@ -323,15 +369,19 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
323
369
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
324
370
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
325
371
|
});
|
|
326
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal
|
|
372
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
373
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
374
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
327
375
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
328
376
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
377
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
329
378
|
} else {
|
|
330
379
|
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
331
380
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
332
381
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
333
382
|
return undefined;
|
|
334
383
|
}
|
|
384
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
335
385
|
}
|
|
336
386
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
337
387
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
@@ -378,7 +428,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
378
428
|
});
|
|
379
429
|
return undefined;
|
|
380
430
|
}
|
|
381
|
-
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
431
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
382
432
|
}
|
|
383
433
|
/**
|
|
384
434
|
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
@@ -395,17 +445,44 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
395
445
|
}
|
|
396
446
|
return true;
|
|
397
447
|
}
|
|
398
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
448
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
399
449
|
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
400
450
|
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
401
451
|
return undefined;
|
|
402
452
|
}
|
|
403
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
453
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
404
454
|
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
405
455
|
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
406
456
|
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
407
457
|
return attestations;
|
|
408
458
|
}
|
|
459
|
+
/**
|
|
460
|
+
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
461
|
+
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
462
|
+
try {
|
|
463
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
464
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
465
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
466
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
467
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
468
|
+
return;
|
|
469
|
+
}
|
|
470
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
471
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
472
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
473
|
+
return;
|
|
474
|
+
}
|
|
475
|
+
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
476
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
477
|
+
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
478
|
+
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
479
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
480
|
+
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
481
|
+
});
|
|
482
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
483
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
484
|
+
}
|
|
485
|
+
}
|
|
409
486
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
410
487
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
411
488
|
// Skip if signature is invalid (shouldn't happen since we validate earlier)
|
|
@@ -413,11 +490,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
413
490
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
414
491
|
return;
|
|
415
492
|
}
|
|
416
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
417
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
418
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
419
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
420
|
-
}
|
|
421
493
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
422
494
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
423
495
|
{
|
|
@@ -428,17 +500,122 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
428
500
|
}
|
|
429
501
|
]);
|
|
430
502
|
}
|
|
503
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
504
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
505
|
+
return;
|
|
506
|
+
}
|
|
507
|
+
// The slot is already marked invalid by the all-nodes checkpoint handler that invokes this callback,
|
|
508
|
+
// so we only emit the proposer slash event here.
|
|
509
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
510
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
511
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
512
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
513
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
514
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
515
|
+
});
|
|
516
|
+
}
|
|
517
|
+
}
|
|
518
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
519
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
520
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
521
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
522
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
523
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
524
|
+
});
|
|
525
|
+
return false;
|
|
526
|
+
}
|
|
527
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
528
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
529
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
530
|
+
return false;
|
|
531
|
+
}
|
|
532
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
533
|
+
{
|
|
534
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
535
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
536
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
537
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
538
|
+
}
|
|
539
|
+
]);
|
|
540
|
+
return true;
|
|
541
|
+
}
|
|
542
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
543
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
544
|
+
}
|
|
545
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
546
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
547
|
+
if (!this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) || this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber)) {
|
|
548
|
+
return;
|
|
549
|
+
}
|
|
550
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
551
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
552
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
553
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
554
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
555
|
+
});
|
|
556
|
+
return;
|
|
557
|
+
}
|
|
558
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
559
|
+
}
|
|
560
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
561
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
562
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
563
|
+
return;
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
565
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
566
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
567
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
568
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
569
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
570
|
+
});
|
|
571
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
572
|
+
{
|
|
573
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
574
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
575
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
576
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
577
|
+
}
|
|
578
|
+
]);
|
|
579
|
+
}
|
|
580
|
+
/**
|
|
581
|
+
* Handle detection of an oversized block proposal: one whose index within its checkpoint lands at or
|
|
582
|
+
* beyond the consensus per-checkpoint block limit. A single signed proposal at an illegal index is
|
|
583
|
+
* self-contained evidence, so emit an invalid-block-proposal slash event for the proposer, deduped per
|
|
584
|
+
* (proposer, slot) since the p2p layer reports every oversized proposal it stores.
|
|
585
|
+
*/ handleOversizedProposal(info) {
|
|
586
|
+
const { slot, proposer } = info;
|
|
587
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL;
|
|
588
|
+
if (!this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(`${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${slot}`)) {
|
|
589
|
+
return;
|
|
590
|
+
}
|
|
591
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected oversized block proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
592
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
593
|
+
slot,
|
|
594
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
595
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(offenseType)
|
|
596
|
+
});
|
|
597
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
598
|
+
{
|
|
599
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
600
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
601
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
602
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
603
|
+
}
|
|
604
|
+
]);
|
|
605
|
+
}
|
|
431
606
|
/**
|
|
432
607
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
433
608
|
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
434
609
|
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
435
610
|
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
436
|
-
this.
|
|
611
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markProposalEquivocation(slot);
|
|
612
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
437
613
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
438
614
|
slot,
|
|
439
|
-
type
|
|
615
|
+
type,
|
|
616
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
617
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
440
618
|
});
|
|
441
|
-
// Emit slash event
|
|
442
619
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
443
620
|
{
|
|
444
621
|
validator: proposer,
|
|
@@ -447,15 +624,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
447
624
|
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
448
625
|
}
|
|
449
626
|
]);
|
|
627
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
628
|
+
{
|
|
629
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
630
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
631
|
+
}
|
|
632
|
+
]);
|
|
450
633
|
}
|
|
451
634
|
/**
|
|
452
635
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
453
636
|
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
454
637
|
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
455
638
|
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
456
|
-
this.log.
|
|
639
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
457
640
|
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
458
|
-
slot
|
|
641
|
+
slot,
|
|
642
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
643
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
459
644
|
});
|
|
460
645
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
461
646
|
{
|
|
@@ -466,7 +651,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
466
651
|
}
|
|
467
652
|
]);
|
|
468
653
|
}
|
|
469
|
-
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
654
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
470
655
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
471
656
|
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
472
657
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -477,14 +662,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
477
662
|
}
|
|
478
663
|
}
|
|
479
664
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
480
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
665
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
481
666
|
...options,
|
|
482
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
667
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
483
668
|
});
|
|
484
669
|
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
485
670
|
return newProposal;
|
|
486
671
|
}
|
|
487
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
672
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
488
673
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
489
674
|
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
490
675
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -494,23 +679,30 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
494
679
|
}
|
|
495
680
|
}
|
|
496
681
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
497
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
682
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
498
683
|
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
684
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
685
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
686
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
687
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
688
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
689
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
690
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
499
691
|
return newProposal;
|
|
500
692
|
}
|
|
501
693
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
502
694
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
503
695
|
}
|
|
504
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
505
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
696
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
697
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
506
698
|
}
|
|
507
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
699
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
508
700
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
509
701
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
510
702
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
511
703
|
inCommittee
|
|
512
704
|
});
|
|
513
|
-
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
705
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
514
706
|
if (!attestations) {
|
|
515
707
|
return [];
|
|
516
708
|
}
|
|
@@ -522,7 +714,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
522
714
|
});
|
|
523
715
|
return attestations;
|
|
524
716
|
}
|
|
525
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
717
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
526
718
|
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
527
719
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
528
720
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
@@ -530,28 +722,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
530
722
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
531
723
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
532
724
|
}
|
|
533
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
534
|
-
const
|
|
725
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
726
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
535
727
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
536
728
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
537
729
|
while(true){
|
|
538
|
-
//
|
|
539
|
-
//
|
|
540
|
-
|
|
541
|
-
|
|
542
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
543
|
-
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
544
|
-
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
545
|
-
});
|
|
546
|
-
return false;
|
|
547
|
-
}
|
|
548
|
-
return true;
|
|
549
|
-
});
|
|
730
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
731
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
732
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
733
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
550
734
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
551
735
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
552
736
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
553
737
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
554
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
738
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
555
739
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
556
740
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
557
741
|
continue;
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,30 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
-
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
90
|
-
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.a5db02d",
|
|
91
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
92
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
93
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|
|
@@ -219,10 +219,12 @@ export class CheckpointBuilder implements ICheckpointBlockBuilder {
|
|
|
219
219
|
if (opts.isBuildingProposal) {
|
|
220
220
|
const remainingBlocks = Math.max(1, opts.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint - existingBlocks.length);
|
|
221
221
|
const multiplier = opts.perBlockAllocationMultiplier;
|
|
222
|
+
// DA gas and blob fields use a higher multiplier so the largest contract class deploy fits a block.
|
|
223
|
+
const daMultiplier = opts.perBlockDAAllocationMultiplier ?? multiplier;
|
|
222
224
|
|
|
223
225
|
cappedL2Gas = Math.min(cappedL2Gas, Math.ceil((remainingMana / remainingBlocks) * multiplier));
|
|
224
|
-
cappedDAGas = Math.min(cappedDAGas, Math.ceil((remainingDAGas / remainingBlocks) *
|
|
225
|
-
cappedBlobFields = Math.min(cappedBlobFields, Math.ceil((maxBlobFieldsForTxs / remainingBlocks) *
|
|
226
|
+
cappedDAGas = Math.min(cappedDAGas, Math.ceil((remainingDAGas / remainingBlocks) * daMultiplier));
|
|
227
|
+
cappedBlobFields = Math.min(cappedBlobFields, Math.ceil((maxBlobFieldsForTxs / remainingBlocks) * daMultiplier));
|
|
226
228
|
cappedMaxTransactions = Math.min(cappedMaxTransactions, Math.ceil((remainingTxs / remainingBlocks) * multiplier));
|
|
227
229
|
}
|
|
228
230
|
|