@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.9d2bcf6d → 0.0.1-commit.9ef841308
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +60 -18
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +21 -8
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +124 -46
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +26 -6
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +6 -12
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +7 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +6 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -3
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -2
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +94 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/{block_proposal_handler.js → proposal_handler.js} +377 -67
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +35 -21
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +177 -218
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +142 -39
- package/src/config.ts +26 -6
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +12 -11
- package/src/factory.ts +9 -3
- package/src/index.ts +1 -2
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +1 -1
- package/src/metrics.ts +19 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +907 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +240 -248
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -63
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -19
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -555
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -154
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,25 +1,20 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import { BlockNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
-
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
1
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
6
2
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
7
3
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
8
4
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
5
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
6
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
7
|
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
-
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
13
8
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
9
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
15
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
10
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
16
11
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
17
12
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
18
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
19
13
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
20
14
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
21
15
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
22
16
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
17
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
23
18
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
24
19
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
25
20
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
@@ -34,13 +29,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
34
29
|
keyStore;
|
|
35
30
|
epochCache;
|
|
36
31
|
p2pClient;
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
blockSource;
|
|
39
|
-
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
40
|
-
worldState;
|
|
41
|
-
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
32
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
42
33
|
config;
|
|
43
34
|
blobClient;
|
|
35
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
44
36
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
37
|
tracer;
|
|
46
38
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,13 +40,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
40
|
log;
|
|
49
41
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
42
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
43
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
44
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
45
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
46
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
47
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
55
48
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
49
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
50
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
51
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
58
52
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
59
53
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
60
54
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -93,6 +87,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
93
87
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
94
88
|
return;
|
|
95
89
|
}
|
|
90
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
96
91
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
97
92
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
98
93
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -108,30 +103,49 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
108
103
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
109
104
|
}
|
|
110
105
|
}
|
|
111
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
106
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
112
107
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
113
108
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
114
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
109
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
110
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
115
111
|
});
|
|
116
|
-
const
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
112
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
113
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
114
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
115
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
116
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
117
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
118
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
119
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
120
|
+
}));
|
|
121
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
122
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
119
123
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
120
124
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
121
125
|
...config,
|
|
122
126
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
123
127
|
};
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
128
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
129
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
130
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
131
|
+
}));
|
|
132
|
+
} else {
|
|
133
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
134
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
135
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
136
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
137
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
138
|
+
}));
|
|
126
139
|
}
|
|
127
|
-
const
|
|
140
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
141
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
128
142
|
return validator;
|
|
129
143
|
}
|
|
130
144
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
131
145
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
132
146
|
}
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
return this.
|
|
147
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
148
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
135
149
|
}
|
|
136
150
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
137
151
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
@@ -151,6 +165,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
151
165
|
...config
|
|
152
166
|
};
|
|
153
167
|
}
|
|
168
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
169
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
170
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
171
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
172
|
+
}
|
|
154
173
|
async start() {
|
|
155
174
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
156
175
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
@@ -183,6 +202,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
183
202
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
184
203
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
185
204
|
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
205
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
206
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
207
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
208
|
+
});
|
|
209
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
210
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
211
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
212
|
+
});
|
|
186
213
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
187
214
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
188
215
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -203,6 +230,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
203
230
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
204
231
|
return false;
|
|
205
232
|
}
|
|
233
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
234
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
235
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
236
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
237
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
238
|
+
});
|
|
239
|
+
}
|
|
206
240
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
207
241
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
208
242
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -217,12 +251,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
217
251
|
});
|
|
218
252
|
// Reexecute txs if we are part of the committee, or if slashing is enabled, or if we are configured to always reexecute.
|
|
219
253
|
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
220
|
-
const {
|
|
221
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n
|
|
222
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
254
|
+
const { slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
255
|
+
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n || partOfCommittee || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
256
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
223
257
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
224
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
225
258
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
259
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
226
260
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
227
261
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
228
262
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -262,46 +296,43 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
262
296
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
263
297
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
264
298
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
265
|
-
const
|
|
299
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
266
300
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
267
301
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
268
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
269
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
302
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
303
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
270
304
|
return undefined;
|
|
271
305
|
}
|
|
272
|
-
//
|
|
273
|
-
if (
|
|
274
|
-
this.log.
|
|
306
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
307
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
308
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
309
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
310
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
311
|
+
});
|
|
275
312
|
return undefined;
|
|
276
313
|
}
|
|
277
|
-
// Check that I have any address in
|
|
278
|
-
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(
|
|
314
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
315
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
279
316
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
280
317
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
318
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
282
319
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
283
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
284
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
320
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
285
321
|
};
|
|
286
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
322
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
287
323
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
288
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
289
324
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
290
325
|
});
|
|
291
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal
|
|
326
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal and upload blobs (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
292
327
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
293
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
328
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
294
329
|
} else {
|
|
295
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
330
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
296
331
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
297
332
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
298
333
|
return undefined;
|
|
299
334
|
}
|
|
300
335
|
}
|
|
301
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
302
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
303
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
304
|
-
}
|
|
305
336
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
306
337
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
307
338
|
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
@@ -309,12 +340,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
309
340
|
return undefined;
|
|
310
341
|
}
|
|
311
342
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
312
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
343
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
313
344
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
314
345
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
315
346
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
316
347
|
});
|
|
317
348
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
349
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
350
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
351
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
352
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
353
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
354
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
355
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
356
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
357
|
+
}
|
|
358
|
+
}
|
|
318
359
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
319
360
|
let attestors;
|
|
320
361
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -331,176 +372,39 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
331
372
|
}
|
|
332
373
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
333
374
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
334
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
375
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
335
376
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
336
377
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
337
378
|
});
|
|
338
379
|
return undefined;
|
|
339
380
|
}
|
|
340
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
341
|
-
}
|
|
342
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
343
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
344
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
345
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
381
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
346
382
|
}
|
|
347
383
|
/**
|
|
348
|
-
*
|
|
349
|
-
* @returns
|
|
350
|
-
*/
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
353
|
-
|
|
354
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
355
|
-
try {
|
|
356
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
357
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
358
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
359
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
360
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
361
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
362
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
363
|
-
return {
|
|
364
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
365
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
366
|
-
};
|
|
367
|
-
}
|
|
368
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
369
|
-
return {
|
|
370
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
371
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
372
|
-
};
|
|
373
|
-
}
|
|
374
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
375
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
376
|
-
return {
|
|
377
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
378
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
379
|
-
};
|
|
380
|
-
}
|
|
381
|
-
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
382
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
383
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
384
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
385
|
-
return {
|
|
386
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
387
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
388
|
-
};
|
|
384
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
385
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
386
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
387
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
388
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
389
|
+
return true;
|
|
389
390
|
}
|
|
390
|
-
|
|
391
|
-
|
|
392
|
-
|
|
393
|
-
|
|
394
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
395
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
396
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
397
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
398
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
399
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
400
|
-
// Compute the previous checkpoint out hashes for the epoch.
|
|
401
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
402
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
403
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
404
|
-
const previousCheckpoints = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsForEpoch(epoch)).filter((b)=>b.number < checkpointNumber).sort((a, b)=>a.number - b.number);
|
|
405
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
406
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
407
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
408
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
409
|
-
try {
|
|
410
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
411
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
412
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
413
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
414
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
415
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
416
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
417
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
418
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
419
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
420
|
-
});
|
|
421
|
-
return {
|
|
422
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
423
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
424
|
-
};
|
|
425
|
-
}
|
|
426
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
427
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
428
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
429
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
430
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
431
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
432
|
-
});
|
|
433
|
-
return {
|
|
434
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
435
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
436
|
-
};
|
|
437
|
-
}
|
|
438
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
439
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
440
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
441
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
442
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
443
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
444
|
-
]);
|
|
445
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
446
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
447
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
448
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
449
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
450
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
451
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
452
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
453
|
-
});
|
|
454
|
-
return {
|
|
455
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
456
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
457
|
-
};
|
|
458
|
-
}
|
|
459
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
460
|
-
return {
|
|
461
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
462
|
-
};
|
|
463
|
-
} finally{
|
|
464
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
391
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
392
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
393
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
394
|
+
return false;
|
|
465
395
|
}
|
|
396
|
+
return true;
|
|
466
397
|
}
|
|
467
|
-
|
|
468
|
-
|
|
469
|
-
|
|
470
|
-
|
|
471
|
-
return {
|
|
472
|
-
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
473
|
-
version: gv.version,
|
|
474
|
-
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
475
|
-
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
476
|
-
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
477
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
478
|
-
};
|
|
479
|
-
}
|
|
480
|
-
/**
|
|
481
|
-
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
482
|
-
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
483
|
-
try {
|
|
484
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
485
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
486
|
-
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
487
|
-
return;
|
|
488
|
-
}
|
|
489
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
490
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
491
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
492
|
-
return;
|
|
493
|
-
}
|
|
494
|
-
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
495
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
496
|
-
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
497
|
-
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
498
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
499
|
-
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
500
|
-
});
|
|
501
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
502
|
-
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
398
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
399
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
400
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
401
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
503
402
|
}
|
|
403
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
404
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
405
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
406
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
407
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
504
408
|
}
|
|
505
409
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
506
410
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
@@ -524,23 +428,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
524
428
|
}
|
|
525
429
|
]);
|
|
526
430
|
}
|
|
431
|
+
/**
|
|
432
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
433
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
434
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
435
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
436
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
437
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
438
|
+
slot,
|
|
439
|
+
type
|
|
440
|
+
});
|
|
441
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
442
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
443
|
+
{
|
|
444
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
445
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
446
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
447
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
448
|
+
}
|
|
449
|
+
]);
|
|
450
|
+
}
|
|
451
|
+
/**
|
|
452
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
453
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
454
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
455
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
456
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
457
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
458
|
+
slot
|
|
459
|
+
});
|
|
460
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
461
|
+
{
|
|
462
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
463
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
464
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
465
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
466
|
+
}
|
|
467
|
+
]);
|
|
468
|
+
}
|
|
527
469
|
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
528
|
-
//
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
|
|
531
|
-
|
|
532
|
-
|
|
470
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
471
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
472
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
473
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
474
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
475
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
476
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
477
|
+
}
|
|
478
|
+
}
|
|
533
479
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
534
480
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
535
481
|
...options,
|
|
536
482
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
537
483
|
});
|
|
538
|
-
this.
|
|
484
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
539
485
|
return newProposal;
|
|
540
486
|
}
|
|
541
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
487
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
488
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
489
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
490
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
491
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
492
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
493
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
494
|
+
}
|
|
495
|
+
}
|
|
542
496
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
543
|
-
|
|
497
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
498
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
499
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
544
500
|
}
|
|
545
501
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
546
502
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
@@ -555,6 +511,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
555
511
|
inCommittee
|
|
556
512
|
});
|
|
557
513
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
514
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
515
|
+
return [];
|
|
516
|
+
}
|
|
558
517
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
559
518
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
560
519
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,30 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
-
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
90
|
-
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.9ef841308",
|
|
91
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
92
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
93
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|