@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.733c4a3 → 0.0.1-commit.7689c7f
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +51 -11
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +14 -4
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +101 -30
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +33 -7
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +33 -45
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +10 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +11 -5
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +14 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +24 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +135 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1111 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +31 -21
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +260 -263
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +124 -35
- package/src/config.ts +33 -6
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +52 -54
- package/src/factory.ts +20 -3
- package/src/index.ts +1 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +1 -1
- package/src/metrics.ts +37 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1207 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +338 -305
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -63
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -532
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -535
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,48 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
3
|
-
import {
|
|
4
|
-
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
5
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
6
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
7
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
8
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
9
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
10
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
11
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
12
|
-
import { getEpochAtSlot
|
|
13
|
-
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
10
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
14
11
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
15
12
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
16
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
13
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
17
14
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
18
15
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
19
|
-
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
20
16
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
21
17
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
22
18
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
23
19
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
20
|
+
import { ProposalHandler } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
24
21
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
25
22
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
26
23
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
24
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS = 1000;
|
|
25
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
27
27
|
// What errors from the block proposal handler result in slashing
|
|
28
28
|
const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
29
29
|
'state_mismatch',
|
|
30
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
30
|
+
'failed_txs',
|
|
31
|
+
'global_variables_mismatch',
|
|
32
|
+
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
33
|
+
'parent_block_wrong_slot',
|
|
34
|
+
'in_hash_mismatch'
|
|
31
35
|
];
|
|
36
|
+
const SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = {
|
|
37
|
+
// enabled
|
|
38
|
+
['invalid_fee_asset_price_modifier']: true,
|
|
39
|
+
['checkpoint_header_mismatch']: true,
|
|
40
|
+
// These late mismatches should normally be caught by earlier checks, but if reached after validating the local
|
|
41
|
+
// checkpoint inputs, the proposer-signed payload disagrees with deterministic recomputation.
|
|
42
|
+
['archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
43
|
+
['out_hash_mismatch']: true,
|
|
44
|
+
['no_blocks_for_slot']: true,
|
|
45
|
+
['too_many_blocks_in_checkpoint']: true,
|
|
46
|
+
['checkpoint_validation_failed']: true,
|
|
47
|
+
['last_block_archive_mismatch']: true,
|
|
48
|
+
// disabled
|
|
49
|
+
['invalid_signature']: false,
|
|
50
|
+
['last_block_not_found']: false,
|
|
51
|
+
['block_fetch_error']: false,
|
|
52
|
+
['checkpoint_already_published']: false
|
|
53
|
+
};
|
|
32
54
|
/**
|
|
33
55
|
* Validator Client
|
|
34
56
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
35
57
|
keyStore;
|
|
36
58
|
epochCache;
|
|
37
59
|
p2pClient;
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
60
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
39
61
|
blockSource;
|
|
40
62
|
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
41
63
|
worldState;
|
|
42
64
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
43
65
|
config;
|
|
44
66
|
blobClient;
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
67
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
46
68
|
dateProvider;
|
|
47
69
|
tracer;
|
|
48
70
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -54,15 +76,21 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
54
76
|
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
55
77
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
56
78
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
79
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
57
80
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
81
|
+
slotsWithInvalidProposals;
|
|
82
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
83
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
84
|
+
slotsWithProposalEquivocation;
|
|
58
85
|
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
59
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient,
|
|
60
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.
|
|
86
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
87
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.slotsWithInvalidProposals = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS), this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_PROPOSAL_SLOTS);
|
|
61
88
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
62
89
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
63
90
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
64
91
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
65
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
92
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
93
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
66
94
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
67
95
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
68
96
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -96,6 +124,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
96
124
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
97
125
|
return;
|
|
98
126
|
}
|
|
127
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
99
128
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
100
129
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
101
130
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -111,40 +140,65 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
111
140
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
112
141
|
}
|
|
113
142
|
}
|
|
114
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
143
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
115
144
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
116
145
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
117
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
146
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
147
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
148
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
149
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
150
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
151
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
152
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
153
|
+
}
|
|
118
154
|
});
|
|
119
|
-
const
|
|
155
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
120
156
|
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
121
|
-
let
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
157
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
158
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
159
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
160
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
161
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
162
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
163
|
+
}));
|
|
164
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
165
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
124
166
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
125
167
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
126
168
|
...config,
|
|
127
169
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
128
170
|
};
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
171
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
130
172
|
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
131
173
|
dateProvider
|
|
132
|
-
});
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
174
|
+
}));
|
|
175
|
+
} else {
|
|
176
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
177
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
178
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
179
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
180
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
181
|
+
}));
|
|
135
182
|
}
|
|
136
|
-
const
|
|
183
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
184
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
137
185
|
return validator;
|
|
138
186
|
}
|
|
139
187
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
140
188
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
141
189
|
}
|
|
142
|
-
|
|
143
|
-
return this.
|
|
190
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
191
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
144
192
|
}
|
|
145
193
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
146
194
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
147
195
|
}
|
|
196
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
197
|
+
return {
|
|
198
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
199
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
200
|
+
};
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
148
202
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
149
203
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
150
204
|
}
|
|
@@ -154,25 +208,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
154
208
|
getConfig() {
|
|
155
209
|
return this.config;
|
|
156
210
|
}
|
|
211
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
212
|
+
return this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber);
|
|
213
|
+
}
|
|
214
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
215
|
+
return this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber);
|
|
216
|
+
}
|
|
157
217
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
158
218
|
this.config = {
|
|
159
219
|
...this.config,
|
|
160
220
|
...config
|
|
161
221
|
};
|
|
222
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
162
223
|
}
|
|
163
224
|
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
164
|
-
if (this.config.haSigningEnabled && !this.haSigner) {
|
|
165
|
-
this.log.warn('HA signing is enabled in config but was not initialized at startup. ' + 'Restart the node to enable HA signing.');
|
|
166
|
-
} else if (!this.config.haSigningEnabled && this.haSigner) {
|
|
167
|
-
this.log.warn('HA signing was disabled via config update but the HA signer is still active. ' + 'Restart the node to fully disable HA signing.');
|
|
168
|
-
}
|
|
169
225
|
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
170
|
-
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
} else {
|
|
173
|
-
this.keyStore = newAdapter;
|
|
174
|
-
}
|
|
175
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
226
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
227
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
176
228
|
}
|
|
177
229
|
async start() {
|
|
178
230
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
@@ -205,7 +257,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
205
257
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
206
258
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
207
259
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
208
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
260
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
209
261
|
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
210
262
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
211
263
|
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
@@ -214,6 +266,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
214
266
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
215
267
|
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
216
268
|
});
|
|
269
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
270
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
271
|
+
});
|
|
217
272
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
218
273
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
219
274
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -234,13 +289,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
234
289
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
235
290
|
return false;
|
|
236
291
|
}
|
|
237
|
-
//
|
|
292
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
238
293
|
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
239
|
-
this.log.
|
|
294
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
240
295
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
241
296
|
slotNumber
|
|
242
297
|
});
|
|
243
|
-
return false;
|
|
244
298
|
}
|
|
245
299
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
246
300
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
@@ -254,14 +308,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
254
308
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
255
309
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
256
310
|
});
|
|
257
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
258
|
-
|
|
259
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
260
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
261
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
311
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
312
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
262
313
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
263
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
264
314
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
315
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
265
316
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
266
317
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
267
318
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -276,10 +327,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
276
327
|
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
277
328
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
278
329
|
}
|
|
279
|
-
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
330
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
331
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
332
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
333
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
334
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
335
|
+
});
|
|
282
336
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
337
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
283
338
|
}
|
|
284
339
|
return false;
|
|
285
340
|
}
|
|
@@ -301,58 +356,50 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
301
356
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
302
357
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
303
358
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
304
|
-
const
|
|
359
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
305
360
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
306
361
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
307
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
308
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
362
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
363
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
309
364
|
return undefined;
|
|
310
365
|
}
|
|
311
|
-
//
|
|
312
|
-
if (!
|
|
313
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
366
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
367
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
314
368
|
return undefined;
|
|
315
369
|
}
|
|
316
370
|
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
317
|
-
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
318
|
-
this.log.
|
|
371
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
372
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
319
373
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
320
|
-
|
|
374
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
321
375
|
});
|
|
322
376
|
return undefined;
|
|
323
377
|
}
|
|
324
|
-
//
|
|
325
|
-
|
|
326
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
327
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
328
|
-
}
|
|
329
|
-
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
330
|
-
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
378
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
379
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
331
380
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
332
381
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
333
|
-
|
|
382
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
334
383
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
335
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
336
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
384
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
337
385
|
};
|
|
338
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
386
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
339
387
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
340
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
341
388
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
342
389
|
});
|
|
343
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
390
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
391
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
392
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
344
393
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
345
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
394
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
395
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
346
396
|
} else {
|
|
347
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
397
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
348
398
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
349
399
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
350
400
|
return undefined;
|
|
351
401
|
}
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
353
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
354
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
355
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
402
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
356
403
|
}
|
|
357
404
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
358
405
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
@@ -361,12 +408,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
361
408
|
return undefined;
|
|
362
409
|
}
|
|
363
410
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
364
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
411
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
365
412
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
366
413
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
367
414
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
368
415
|
});
|
|
369
416
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
417
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
418
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
419
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
420
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
421
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
422
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
423
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
424
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
425
|
+
}
|
|
426
|
+
}
|
|
370
427
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
371
428
|
let attestors;
|
|
372
429
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -383,13 +440,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
383
440
|
}
|
|
384
441
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
385
442
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
386
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
443
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
387
444
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
388
445
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
389
446
|
});
|
|
390
447
|
return undefined;
|
|
391
448
|
}
|
|
392
|
-
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
449
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
393
450
|
}
|
|
394
451
|
/**
|
|
395
452
|
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
@@ -406,164 +463,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
406
463
|
}
|
|
407
464
|
return true;
|
|
408
465
|
}
|
|
409
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
466
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
410
467
|
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
411
468
|
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
412
469
|
return undefined;
|
|
413
470
|
}
|
|
414
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
471
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
415
472
|
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
416
473
|
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
417
474
|
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
418
475
|
return attestations;
|
|
419
476
|
}
|
|
420
477
|
/**
|
|
421
|
-
* Validates a checkpoint proposal by building the full checkpoint and comparing it with the proposal.
|
|
422
|
-
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
423
|
-
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
424
|
-
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
425
|
-
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
426
|
-
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
427
|
-
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
428
|
-
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
429
|
-
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
430
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
431
|
-
try {
|
|
432
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
433
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
434
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
435
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
436
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
437
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
438
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
439
|
-
return {
|
|
440
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
441
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
442
|
-
};
|
|
443
|
-
}
|
|
444
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
445
|
-
return {
|
|
446
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
447
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
448
|
-
};
|
|
449
|
-
}
|
|
450
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
451
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
452
|
-
return {
|
|
453
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
454
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
455
|
-
};
|
|
456
|
-
}
|
|
457
|
-
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
458
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
459
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
460
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
461
|
-
return {
|
|
462
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
463
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
464
|
-
};
|
|
465
|
-
}
|
|
466
|
-
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
467
|
-
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
468
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
469
|
-
return {
|
|
470
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
471
|
-
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
472
|
-
};
|
|
473
|
-
}
|
|
474
|
-
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
475
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
476
|
-
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
477
|
-
});
|
|
478
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
479
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
480
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
481
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
482
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
483
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
484
|
-
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
485
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
486
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
487
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
488
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
489
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
490
|
-
try {
|
|
491
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
492
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
493
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
494
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
495
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
496
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
497
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
498
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
499
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
500
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
501
|
-
});
|
|
502
|
-
return {
|
|
503
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
504
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
505
|
-
};
|
|
506
|
-
}
|
|
507
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
508
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
509
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
510
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
511
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
512
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
513
|
-
});
|
|
514
|
-
return {
|
|
515
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
516
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
517
|
-
};
|
|
518
|
-
}
|
|
519
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
520
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
521
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
522
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
523
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
524
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
525
|
-
]);
|
|
526
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
527
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
528
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
529
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
530
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
531
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
532
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
533
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
534
|
-
});
|
|
535
|
-
return {
|
|
536
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
537
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
538
|
-
};
|
|
539
|
-
}
|
|
540
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
541
|
-
return {
|
|
542
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
543
|
-
};
|
|
544
|
-
} finally{
|
|
545
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
546
|
-
}
|
|
547
|
-
}
|
|
548
|
-
/**
|
|
549
|
-
* Extract checkpoint global variables from a block.
|
|
550
|
-
*/ extractCheckpointConstants(block) {
|
|
551
|
-
const gv = block.header.globalVariables;
|
|
552
|
-
return {
|
|
553
|
-
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
554
|
-
version: gv.version,
|
|
555
|
-
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
556
|
-
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
557
|
-
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
558
|
-
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
559
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
560
|
-
};
|
|
561
|
-
}
|
|
562
|
-
/**
|
|
563
478
|
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
564
479
|
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
565
480
|
try {
|
|
566
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.
|
|
481
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
482
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
483
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
567
484
|
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
568
485
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
569
486
|
return;
|
|
@@ -591,11 +508,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
591
508
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
592
509
|
return;
|
|
593
510
|
}
|
|
594
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
595
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
596
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
597
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
598
|
-
}
|
|
599
511
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
600
512
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
601
513
|
{
|
|
@@ -606,17 +518,95 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
606
518
|
}
|
|
607
519
|
]);
|
|
608
520
|
}
|
|
521
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
522
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
523
|
+
return;
|
|
524
|
+
}
|
|
525
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
526
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
527
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
528
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
529
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
530
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
531
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
532
|
+
});
|
|
533
|
+
}
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
536
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
537
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
538
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
539
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
540
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
541
|
+
});
|
|
542
|
+
return false;
|
|
543
|
+
}
|
|
544
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
545
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
546
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
547
|
+
return false;
|
|
548
|
+
}
|
|
549
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
550
|
+
{
|
|
551
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
552
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
553
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
554
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
555
|
+
}
|
|
556
|
+
]);
|
|
557
|
+
return true;
|
|
558
|
+
}
|
|
559
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
560
|
+
this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.add(slotNumber);
|
|
561
|
+
}
|
|
562
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
563
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
564
|
+
if (!this.slotsWithInvalidProposals.has(slotNumber) || this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
565
|
+
return;
|
|
566
|
+
}
|
|
567
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
568
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
569
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
570
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
571
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
572
|
+
});
|
|
573
|
+
return;
|
|
574
|
+
}
|
|
575
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
576
|
+
}
|
|
577
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
578
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
579
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
580
|
+
return;
|
|
581
|
+
}
|
|
582
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
583
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
584
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
585
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
586
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
587
|
+
});
|
|
588
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
589
|
+
{
|
|
590
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
591
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
592
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
593
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
594
|
+
}
|
|
595
|
+
]);
|
|
596
|
+
}
|
|
609
597
|
/**
|
|
610
598
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
611
599
|
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
612
600
|
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
613
601
|
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
614
|
-
this.
|
|
602
|
+
this.slotsWithProposalEquivocation.add(slot);
|
|
603
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
615
604
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
616
605
|
slot,
|
|
617
|
-
type
|
|
606
|
+
type,
|
|
607
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
608
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
618
609
|
});
|
|
619
|
-
// Emit slash event
|
|
620
610
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
621
611
|
{
|
|
622
612
|
validator: proposer,
|
|
@@ -625,15 +615,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
625
615
|
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
626
616
|
}
|
|
627
617
|
]);
|
|
618
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
619
|
+
{
|
|
620
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
621
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
622
|
+
}
|
|
623
|
+
]);
|
|
628
624
|
}
|
|
629
625
|
/**
|
|
630
626
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
631
627
|
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
632
628
|
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
633
629
|
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
634
|
-
this.log.
|
|
630
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
635
631
|
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
636
|
-
slot
|
|
632
|
+
slot,
|
|
633
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
634
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
637
635
|
});
|
|
638
636
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
639
637
|
{
|
|
@@ -644,7 +642,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
644
642
|
}
|
|
645
643
|
]);
|
|
646
644
|
}
|
|
647
|
-
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
645
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
648
646
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
649
647
|
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
650
648
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -655,14 +653,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
655
653
|
}
|
|
656
654
|
}
|
|
657
655
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
658
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
656
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
659
657
|
...options,
|
|
660
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
658
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
661
659
|
});
|
|
662
660
|
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
663
661
|
return newProposal;
|
|
664
662
|
}
|
|
665
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
663
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
666
664
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
667
665
|
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
668
666
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -672,23 +670,30 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
672
670
|
}
|
|
673
671
|
}
|
|
674
672
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
675
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
673
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
676
674
|
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
675
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
676
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
677
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
678
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
679
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
680
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
681
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
677
682
|
return newProposal;
|
|
678
683
|
}
|
|
679
684
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
680
685
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
681
686
|
}
|
|
682
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
683
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
687
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
688
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
684
689
|
}
|
|
685
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
690
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
686
691
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
687
692
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
688
693
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
689
694
|
inCommittee
|
|
690
695
|
});
|
|
691
|
-
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
696
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
692
697
|
if (!attestations) {
|
|
693
698
|
return [];
|
|
694
699
|
}
|
|
@@ -700,7 +705,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
700
705
|
});
|
|
701
706
|
return attestations;
|
|
702
707
|
}
|
|
703
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
708
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
704
709
|
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
705
710
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
706
711
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
@@ -708,28 +713,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
708
713
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
709
714
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
710
715
|
}
|
|
711
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
712
|
-
const
|
|
716
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
717
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
713
718
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
714
719
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
715
720
|
while(true){
|
|
716
|
-
//
|
|
717
|
-
//
|
|
718
|
-
|
|
719
|
-
|
|
720
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
721
|
-
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
722
|
-
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
723
|
-
});
|
|
724
|
-
return false;
|
|
725
|
-
}
|
|
726
|
-
return true;
|
|
727
|
-
});
|
|
721
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
722
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
723
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
724
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
728
725
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
729
726
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
730
727
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
731
728
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
732
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
729
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
733
730
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
734
731
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
735
732
|
continue;
|