@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.3469e52 → 0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +63 -19
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +9 -10
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +135 -82
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +27 -15
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +136 -45
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +30 -7
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +6 -12
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +3 -1
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +3 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts +1 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +0 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +3 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +12 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +46 -5
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +41 -15
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +230 -69
- package/package.json +19 -17
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +165 -109
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +185 -52
- package/src/config.ts +30 -7
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +12 -11
- package/src/factory.ts +4 -0
- package/src/index.ts +0 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +3 -3
- package/src/metrics.ts +63 -6
- package/src/validator.ts +294 -86
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -18
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -135
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { validateFeeAssetPriceModifier } from '@aztec/ethereum/contracts';
|
|
3
|
+
import { BlockNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
4
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
5
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
6
|
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
@@ -8,10 +9,12 @@ import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
|
8
9
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
10
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
11
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
|
-
import {
|
|
12
|
+
import { validateCheckpoint } from '@aztec/stdlib/checkpoint';
|
|
13
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
14
|
+
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
12
15
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
13
16
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
14
|
-
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
17
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
15
18
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
16
19
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
17
20
|
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
@@ -40,6 +43,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
40
43
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
41
44
|
config;
|
|
42
45
|
blobClient;
|
|
46
|
+
slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
43
47
|
dateProvider;
|
|
44
48
|
tracer;
|
|
45
49
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -47,17 +51,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
47
51
|
log;
|
|
48
52
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
49
53
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
54
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
55
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
52
56
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
53
57
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
58
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
54
59
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
validatedBlockSlots;
|
|
59
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set(), this.validatedBlockSlots = new Set();
|
|
60
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
61
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
62
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
61
63
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
62
64
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
63
65
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
96
98
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
97
99
|
return;
|
|
98
100
|
}
|
|
101
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
99
102
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
100
103
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
101
104
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -111,23 +114,42 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
111
114
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
112
115
|
}
|
|
113
116
|
}
|
|
114
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
117
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
115
118
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
116
119
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
117
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
120
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
121
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
118
122
|
});
|
|
119
123
|
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
124
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
125
|
+
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
126
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
127
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
128
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
129
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
130
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
131
|
+
}));
|
|
132
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
133
|
+
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
122
134
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
123
135
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
124
136
|
...config,
|
|
125
137
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
126
138
|
};
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
139
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
140
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
141
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
142
|
+
}));
|
|
143
|
+
} else {
|
|
144
|
+
// Single-node mode: use LMDB-backed local signing protection.
|
|
145
|
+
// This prevents double-signing if the node crashes and restarts mid-proposal.
|
|
146
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = await createLocalSignerWithProtection(config, {
|
|
147
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
148
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
149
|
+
}));
|
|
129
150
|
}
|
|
130
|
-
const
|
|
151
|
+
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
152
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
131
153
|
return validator;
|
|
132
154
|
}
|
|
133
155
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -154,6 +176,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
154
176
|
...config
|
|
155
177
|
};
|
|
156
178
|
}
|
|
179
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
180
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
181
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
182
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
183
|
+
}
|
|
157
184
|
async start() {
|
|
158
185
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
159
186
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
@@ -186,6 +213,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
186
213
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
187
214
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
188
215
|
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
216
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
217
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
218
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
219
|
+
});
|
|
220
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
221
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
222
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
223
|
+
});
|
|
189
224
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
190
225
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
191
226
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -206,6 +241,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
206
241
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
207
242
|
return false;
|
|
208
243
|
}
|
|
244
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
245
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
246
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
247
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
248
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
249
|
+
});
|
|
250
|
+
}
|
|
209
251
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
210
252
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
211
253
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -224,8 +266,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
224
266
|
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
225
267
|
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
226
268
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
227
|
-
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
228
269
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
270
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
229
271
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
230
272
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
231
273
|
'invalid_proposal',
|
|
@@ -257,9 +299,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
257
299
|
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
258
300
|
return false;
|
|
259
301
|
}
|
|
260
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): Remove this once checkpoint validation is stable.
|
|
261
|
-
// Track that we successfully validated a block for this slot, so we can attest to checkpoint proposals for it.
|
|
262
|
-
this.validatedBlockSlots.add(slotNumber);
|
|
263
302
|
return true;
|
|
264
303
|
}
|
|
265
304
|
/**
|
|
@@ -268,42 +307,46 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
268
307
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
269
308
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
270
309
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
271
|
-
const
|
|
310
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
272
311
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
273
312
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
274
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
275
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
313
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
314
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
276
315
|
return undefined;
|
|
277
316
|
}
|
|
278
317
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
279
318
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
280
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${
|
|
319
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for proposal slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`);
|
|
281
320
|
return undefined;
|
|
282
321
|
}
|
|
283
|
-
//
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
322
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
323
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
324
|
+
this.log.debug(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
325
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
326
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
327
|
+
});
|
|
328
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
329
|
+
}
|
|
330
|
+
// Validate fee asset price modifier is within allowed range
|
|
331
|
+
if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
332
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`);
|
|
333
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
334
|
+
}
|
|
335
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
336
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
285
337
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
286
338
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
287
|
-
|
|
339
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
288
340
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
289
|
-
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
290
|
-
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
341
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
291
342
|
};
|
|
292
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
343
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
293
344
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
294
|
-
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
295
345
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
296
346
|
});
|
|
297
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): Remove this once checkpoint validation is stable.
|
|
298
|
-
// Check that we have successfully validated a block for this slot before attesting to the checkpoint.
|
|
299
|
-
if (!this.validatedBlockSlots.has(slotNumber)) {
|
|
300
|
-
this.log.warn(`No validated block found for slot ${slotNumber}, refusing to attest to checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
301
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
302
|
-
}
|
|
303
347
|
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
304
|
-
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
348
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
349
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
307
350
|
} else {
|
|
308
351
|
const validationResult = await this.validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
309
352
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
@@ -322,12 +365,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
322
365
|
return undefined;
|
|
323
366
|
}
|
|
324
367
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
325
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
368
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
326
369
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
327
370
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
328
371
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
329
372
|
});
|
|
330
373
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
374
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
375
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
376
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
377
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
378
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
379
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
380
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
381
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
382
|
+
}
|
|
383
|
+
}
|
|
331
384
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
332
385
|
let attestors;
|
|
333
386
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -344,17 +397,38 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
344
397
|
}
|
|
345
398
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
346
399
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
347
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
400
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
348
401
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
349
402
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
350
403
|
});
|
|
351
404
|
return undefined;
|
|
352
405
|
}
|
|
353
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
406
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
407
|
+
}
|
|
408
|
+
/**
|
|
409
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
410
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
411
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
412
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
413
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
414
|
+
return true;
|
|
415
|
+
}
|
|
416
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
417
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
418
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
419
|
+
return false;
|
|
420
|
+
}
|
|
421
|
+
return true;
|
|
354
422
|
}
|
|
355
423
|
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
424
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
425
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
426
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
427
|
+
}
|
|
356
428
|
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
357
|
-
|
|
429
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
430
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
431
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
358
432
|
return attestations;
|
|
359
433
|
}
|
|
360
434
|
/**
|
|
@@ -362,7 +436,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
362
436
|
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
363
437
|
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
364
438
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
365
|
-
|
|
439
|
+
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
440
|
+
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
441
|
+
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
442
|
+
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
366
443
|
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
367
444
|
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
368
445
|
try {
|
|
@@ -400,6 +477,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
400
477
|
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
401
478
|
};
|
|
402
479
|
}
|
|
480
|
+
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
481
|
+
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
482
|
+
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
483
|
+
return {
|
|
484
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
485
|
+
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
486
|
+
};
|
|
487
|
+
}
|
|
403
488
|
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
404
489
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
405
490
|
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
@@ -410,18 +495,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
410
495
|
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
411
496
|
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
412
497
|
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
413
|
-
//
|
|
414
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
415
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
498
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
416
499
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
417
|
-
const
|
|
418
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
500
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
419
501
|
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
420
502
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
421
503
|
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
422
504
|
try {
|
|
423
505
|
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
424
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks);
|
|
506
|
+
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
425
507
|
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
426
508
|
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
427
509
|
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
@@ -448,13 +530,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
448
530
|
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
449
531
|
};
|
|
450
532
|
}
|
|
451
|
-
// Check that the accumulated out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
452
|
-
|
|
453
|
-
const
|
|
454
|
-
|
|
533
|
+
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
534
|
+
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
535
|
+
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
536
|
+
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
537
|
+
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
538
|
+
checkpointOutHash
|
|
539
|
+
]);
|
|
540
|
+
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
541
|
+
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
455
542
|
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
456
|
-
|
|
457
|
-
|
|
543
|
+
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
544
|
+
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
545
|
+
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
546
|
+
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
458
547
|
...proposalInfo
|
|
459
548
|
});
|
|
460
549
|
return {
|
|
@@ -462,6 +551,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
462
551
|
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
463
552
|
};
|
|
464
553
|
}
|
|
554
|
+
// Final round of validations on the checkpoint, just in case.
|
|
555
|
+
try {
|
|
556
|
+
validateCheckpoint(computedCheckpoint, {
|
|
557
|
+
rollupManaLimit: this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig().rollupManaLimit,
|
|
558
|
+
maxDABlockGas: this.config.validateMaxDABlockGas,
|
|
559
|
+
maxL2BlockGas: this.config.validateMaxL2BlockGas,
|
|
560
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
561
|
+
maxTxsPerCheckpoint: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerCheckpoint
|
|
562
|
+
});
|
|
563
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
564
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint validation failed: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
565
|
+
return {
|
|
566
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
567
|
+
reason: 'checkpoint_validation_failed'
|
|
568
|
+
};
|
|
569
|
+
}
|
|
465
570
|
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
466
571
|
return {
|
|
467
572
|
isValid: true
|
|
@@ -478,6 +583,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
478
583
|
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
479
584
|
version: gv.version,
|
|
480
585
|
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
586
|
+
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
481
587
|
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
482
588
|
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
483
589
|
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
@@ -498,7 +604,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
498
604
|
return;
|
|
499
605
|
}
|
|
500
606
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
501
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
607
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
502
608
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
503
609
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
504
610
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -530,23 +636,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
530
636
|
}
|
|
531
637
|
]);
|
|
532
638
|
}
|
|
533
|
-
|
|
534
|
-
|
|
535
|
-
|
|
536
|
-
|
|
537
|
-
|
|
538
|
-
|
|
639
|
+
/**
|
|
640
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
641
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
642
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
643
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
644
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
645
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
646
|
+
slot,
|
|
647
|
+
type
|
|
648
|
+
});
|
|
649
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
650
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
651
|
+
{
|
|
652
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
653
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
654
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
655
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
656
|
+
}
|
|
657
|
+
]);
|
|
658
|
+
}
|
|
659
|
+
/**
|
|
660
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
661
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
662
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
663
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
664
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
665
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
666
|
+
slot
|
|
667
|
+
});
|
|
668
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
669
|
+
{
|
|
670
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
671
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
672
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
673
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
674
|
+
}
|
|
675
|
+
]);
|
|
676
|
+
}
|
|
677
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
678
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
679
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
680
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
681
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
682
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
683
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
684
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
685
|
+
}
|
|
686
|
+
}
|
|
539
687
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
540
688
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
541
689
|
...options,
|
|
542
690
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
543
691
|
});
|
|
544
|
-
this.
|
|
692
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
545
693
|
return newProposal;
|
|
546
694
|
}
|
|
547
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options) {
|
|
695
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
696
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
697
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
698
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
699
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
700
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
701
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
702
|
+
}
|
|
703
|
+
}
|
|
548
704
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
549
|
-
|
|
705
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
706
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
707
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
550
708
|
}
|
|
551
709
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
552
710
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
@@ -561,6 +719,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
561
719
|
inCommittee
|
|
562
720
|
});
|
|
563
721
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
722
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
723
|
+
return [];
|
|
724
|
+
}
|
|
564
725
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
565
726
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
566
727
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,28 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.35158ae7e",
|
|
89
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
90
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
91
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|