@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.343b43af6 → 0.0.1-commit.350e0a4d
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +21 -21
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +10 -7
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +66 -41
- package/dest/config.d.ts +9 -3
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +23 -10
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +12 -13
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +33 -39
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +10 -4
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +18 -6
- package/dest/index.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -2
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +32 -41
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +6 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts +165 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/proposal_handler.js +1207 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +36 -22
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +247 -266
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +81 -52
- package/src/config.ts +31 -12
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +52 -48
- package/src/factory.ts +29 -5
- package/src/index.ts +1 -1
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +43 -59
- package/src/metrics.ts +19 -1
- package/src/proposal_handler.ts +1314 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +329 -303
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +0 -64
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +0 -606
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +0 -624
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,42 +1,37 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
3
|
-
import {
|
|
4
|
-
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
2
|
+
import { CheckpointNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { FifoSet } from '@aztec/foundation/fifo-set';
|
|
5
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
6
|
-
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
7
5
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
8
6
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
9
7
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
10
8
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
11
|
-
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
12
|
-
import {
|
|
13
|
-
import {
|
|
14
|
-
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
9
|
+
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, getOffenseTypeName } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
10
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
11
|
+
import { ConsensusTimetable } from '@aztec/stdlib/timetable';
|
|
15
12
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
16
13
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
17
|
-
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
14
|
+
import { createHASigner, createLocalSignerWithProtection, createSignerFromSharedDb } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
18
15
|
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
19
16
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
20
|
-
import {
|
|
17
|
+
import { DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS } from './config.js';
|
|
21
18
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
22
19
|
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
23
20
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
24
21
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
22
|
+
import { ProposalHandler, SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT, SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT } from './proposal_handler.js';
|
|
25
23
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
26
24
|
// Just cap the set to avoid unbounded growth.
|
|
27
25
|
const MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS = 1000;
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
const
|
|
30
|
-
'state_mismatch',
|
|
31
|
-
'failed_txs'
|
|
32
|
-
];
|
|
26
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS = 1000;
|
|
27
|
+
const MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS = 10_000;
|
|
33
28
|
/**
|
|
34
29
|
* Validator Client
|
|
35
30
|
*/ export class ValidatorClient extends EventEmitter {
|
|
36
31
|
keyStore;
|
|
37
32
|
epochCache;
|
|
38
33
|
p2pClient;
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
proposalHandler;
|
|
40
35
|
blockSource;
|
|
41
36
|
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
42
37
|
worldState;
|
|
@@ -57,14 +52,18 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
57
52
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
58
53
|
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
59
54
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
55
|
+
invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
56
|
+
oversizedProposalOffenseKeys;
|
|
57
|
+
badAttestationOffenseKeys;
|
|
60
58
|
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
61
|
-
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient,
|
|
62
|
-
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.
|
|
59
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
60
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.proposalHandler = proposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.slashingProtectionSigner = slashingProtectionSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS), this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSALS), this.badAttestationOffenseKeys = FifoSet.withLimit(MAX_TRACKED_BAD_ATTESTATIONS);
|
|
63
61
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
64
62
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
65
63
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
66
64
|
this.metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
67
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
65
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
66
|
+
this.proposalHandler.setCheckpointProposalValidationFailureCallback((proposal, result, proposalInfo)=>this.handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo));
|
|
68
67
|
// Refresh epoch cache every second to trigger alert if participation in committee changes
|
|
69
68
|
this.epochCacheUpdateLoop = new RunningPromise(this.handleEpochCommitteeUpdate.bind(this), this.log, 1000);
|
|
70
69
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
@@ -114,16 +113,33 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
114
113
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
115
114
|
}
|
|
116
115
|
}
|
|
117
|
-
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
116
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
118
117
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
119
|
-
const
|
|
118
|
+
const consensusTimetable = new ConsensusTimetable({
|
|
119
|
+
l1Constants: epochCache.getL1Constants(),
|
|
120
|
+
blockDuration: config.blockDurationMs / 1000
|
|
121
|
+
});
|
|
122
|
+
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, consensusTimetable, {
|
|
120
123
|
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
121
|
-
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock
|
|
124
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
125
|
+
maxBlocksPerCheckpoint: config.maxBlocksPerCheckpoint,
|
|
126
|
+
skipSlotValidation: config.skipProposalSlotValidation,
|
|
127
|
+
signatureContext: {
|
|
128
|
+
chainId: config.l1ChainId,
|
|
129
|
+
rollupAddress: config.rollupAddress
|
|
130
|
+
},
|
|
131
|
+
clockDisparityMs: config.maxGossipClockDisparityMs ?? DEFAULT_MAX_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY_MS
|
|
122
132
|
});
|
|
123
|
-
const
|
|
133
|
+
const proposalHandler = new ProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, consensusTimetable, config, blobClient, reexecutionTracker, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry, undefined);
|
|
124
134
|
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
125
135
|
let slashingProtectionSigner;
|
|
126
|
-
if (
|
|
136
|
+
if (slashingProtectionDb) {
|
|
137
|
+
// Shared database mode: use a pre-existing database (e.g. for testing HA setups).
|
|
138
|
+
({ signer: slashingProtectionSigner } = createSignerFromSharedDb(slashingProtectionDb, config, {
|
|
139
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
140
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
141
|
+
}));
|
|
142
|
+
} else if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
127
143
|
// Multi-node HA mode: use PostgreSQL-backed distributed locking.
|
|
128
144
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
129
145
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
@@ -143,18 +159,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
143
159
|
}));
|
|
144
160
|
}
|
|
145
161
|
const validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
146
|
-
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient,
|
|
162
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, proposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, slashingProtectionSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
147
163
|
return validator;
|
|
148
164
|
}
|
|
149
165
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
150
166
|
return this.keyStore.getAddresses().filter((addr)=>!this.config.disabledValidators.some((disabled)=>disabled.equals(addr)));
|
|
151
167
|
}
|
|
152
|
-
|
|
153
|
-
return this.
|
|
168
|
+
getProposalHandler() {
|
|
169
|
+
return this.proposalHandler;
|
|
154
170
|
}
|
|
155
171
|
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
156
172
|
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
157
173
|
}
|
|
174
|
+
getSignatureContext() {
|
|
175
|
+
return {
|
|
176
|
+
chainId: this.config.l1ChainId,
|
|
177
|
+
rollupAddress: this.config.rollupAddress
|
|
178
|
+
};
|
|
179
|
+
}
|
|
158
180
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
159
181
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
160
182
|
}
|
|
@@ -164,16 +186,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
164
186
|
getConfig() {
|
|
165
187
|
return this.config;
|
|
166
188
|
}
|
|
189
|
+
hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber) {
|
|
190
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber);
|
|
191
|
+
}
|
|
192
|
+
hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) {
|
|
193
|
+
return this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber);
|
|
194
|
+
}
|
|
167
195
|
updateConfig(config) {
|
|
168
196
|
this.config = {
|
|
169
197
|
...this.config,
|
|
170
198
|
...config
|
|
171
199
|
};
|
|
200
|
+
this.proposalHandler.updateConfig(config);
|
|
172
201
|
}
|
|
173
202
|
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
174
203
|
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
175
204
|
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.slashingProtectionSigner);
|
|
176
|
-
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
205
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.getSignatureContext(), this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
177
206
|
}
|
|
178
207
|
async start() {
|
|
179
208
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
@@ -206,15 +235,22 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
206
235
|
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
207
236
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
208
237
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
209
|
-
this.p2pClient.
|
|
238
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerValidatorCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
210
239
|
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
211
240
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
212
241
|
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
213
242
|
});
|
|
243
|
+
// Oversized proposal handler - triggers slashing for proposals beyond the per-checkpoint block limit
|
|
244
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerOversizedProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
245
|
+
this.handleOversizedProposal(info);
|
|
246
|
+
});
|
|
214
247
|
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
215
248
|
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
216
249
|
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
217
250
|
});
|
|
251
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointAttestationCallback((attestation)=>{
|
|
252
|
+
this.handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation);
|
|
253
|
+
});
|
|
218
254
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
219
255
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
220
256
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -235,13 +271,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
235
271
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
236
272
|
return false;
|
|
237
273
|
}
|
|
238
|
-
//
|
|
274
|
+
// Log self-proposals from HA peers (same validator key on different nodes)
|
|
239
275
|
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
240
|
-
this.log.
|
|
276
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Processing block proposal from HA peer for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
241
277
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
242
278
|
slotNumber
|
|
243
279
|
});
|
|
244
|
-
return false;
|
|
245
280
|
}
|
|
246
281
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
247
282
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
@@ -255,11 +290,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
255
290
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
256
291
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
257
292
|
});
|
|
258
|
-
// Reexecute
|
|
259
|
-
|
|
260
|
-
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
261
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
262
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
293
|
+
// Reexecute outside the escape hatch so slashing observers can detect invalid proposals even when penalties are 0.
|
|
294
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
263
295
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
264
296
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
265
297
|
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -277,10 +309,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
277
309
|
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
278
310
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
279
311
|
}
|
|
280
|
-
|
|
281
|
-
|
|
282
|
-
|
|
312
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason)) {
|
|
313
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid block proposal offense`, {
|
|
314
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
315
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
316
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL)
|
|
317
|
+
});
|
|
283
318
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
319
|
+
this.markInvalidProposalSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
284
320
|
}
|
|
285
321
|
return false;
|
|
286
322
|
}
|
|
@@ -302,56 +338,50 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
302
338
|
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
303
339
|
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
304
340
|
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
305
|
-
const
|
|
341
|
+
const proposalSlotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
306
342
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
307
343
|
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
308
|
-
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(
|
|
309
|
-
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${
|
|
344
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
345
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
310
346
|
return undefined;
|
|
311
347
|
}
|
|
312
|
-
//
|
|
313
|
-
if (!
|
|
314
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
348
|
+
// Early-out for equivocation: refuses if we've already attested to a higher slot.
|
|
349
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposalSlotNumber)) {
|
|
315
350
|
return undefined;
|
|
316
351
|
}
|
|
317
352
|
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
318
|
-
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
319
|
-
this.log.debug(`
|
|
353
|
+
if (proposer && this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
354
|
+
this.log.debug(`Not attesting to block proposal from self for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
320
355
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
321
|
-
|
|
356
|
+
proposalSlotNumber
|
|
322
357
|
});
|
|
323
358
|
return undefined;
|
|
324
359
|
}
|
|
325
|
-
//
|
|
326
|
-
|
|
327
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
328
|
-
return undefined;
|
|
329
|
-
}
|
|
330
|
-
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
331
|
-
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
360
|
+
// Check that I have any address in the committee where this checkpoint will land before attesting
|
|
361
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(proposalSlotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
332
362
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
333
363
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
334
|
-
|
|
364
|
+
proposalSlotNumber,
|
|
335
365
|
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
336
|
-
proposer: proposer
|
|
366
|
+
proposer: proposer?.toString()
|
|
337
367
|
};
|
|
338
|
-
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
368
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
339
369
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
340
370
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
341
371
|
});
|
|
342
|
-
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
372
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set).
|
|
373
|
+
// Uses the cached result from the all-nodes callback if available (avoids double validation).
|
|
374
|
+
let checkpointNumber;
|
|
343
375
|
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
344
|
-
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${
|
|
376
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
377
|
+
checkpointNumber = CheckpointNumber(0);
|
|
345
378
|
} else {
|
|
346
|
-
const validationResult = await this.
|
|
379
|
+
const validationResult = await this.proposalHandler.handleCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
347
380
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
348
381
|
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
349
382
|
return undefined;
|
|
350
383
|
}
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
353
|
-
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
354
|
-
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
384
|
+
checkpointNumber = validationResult.checkpointNumber;
|
|
355
385
|
}
|
|
356
386
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
357
387
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
@@ -360,14 +390,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
360
390
|
return undefined;
|
|
361
391
|
}
|
|
362
392
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
363
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${
|
|
393
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
364
394
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
365
395
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
366
396
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
367
397
|
});
|
|
368
398
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
369
399
|
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
370
|
-
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(
|
|
400
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(proposalSlotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
371
401
|
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
372
402
|
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
373
403
|
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
@@ -392,13 +422,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
392
422
|
}
|
|
393
423
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
394
424
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
395
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${
|
|
425
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${proposalSlotNumber}`, {
|
|
396
426
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
397
427
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
398
428
|
});
|
|
399
429
|
return undefined;
|
|
400
430
|
}
|
|
401
|
-
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
431
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
402
432
|
}
|
|
403
433
|
/**
|
|
404
434
|
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
@@ -415,180 +445,24 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
415
445
|
}
|
|
416
446
|
return true;
|
|
417
447
|
}
|
|
418
|
-
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
448
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = [], checkpointNumber) {
|
|
419
449
|
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
420
450
|
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
421
451
|
return undefined;
|
|
422
452
|
}
|
|
423
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
453
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors, checkpointNumber);
|
|
424
454
|
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
425
455
|
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
426
456
|
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
427
457
|
return attestations;
|
|
428
458
|
}
|
|
429
459
|
/**
|
|
430
|
-
* Validates a checkpoint proposal by building the full checkpoint and comparing it with the proposal.
|
|
431
|
-
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
432
|
-
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
433
|
-
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
434
|
-
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
435
|
-
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
436
|
-
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
437
|
-
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
438
|
-
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
439
|
-
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
440
|
-
try {
|
|
441
|
-
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
442
|
-
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
443
|
-
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
444
|
-
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
445
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
446
|
-
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
447
|
-
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
448
|
-
return {
|
|
449
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
450
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
451
|
-
};
|
|
452
|
-
}
|
|
453
|
-
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
454
|
-
return {
|
|
455
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
456
|
-
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
457
|
-
};
|
|
458
|
-
}
|
|
459
|
-
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
460
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
461
|
-
return {
|
|
462
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
463
|
-
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
464
|
-
};
|
|
465
|
-
}
|
|
466
|
-
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
467
|
-
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
468
|
-
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
469
|
-
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
470
|
-
return {
|
|
471
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
472
|
-
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
473
|
-
};
|
|
474
|
-
}
|
|
475
|
-
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
476
|
-
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
477
|
-
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
478
|
-
return {
|
|
479
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
480
|
-
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
481
|
-
};
|
|
482
|
-
}
|
|
483
|
-
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
484
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
485
|
-
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
486
|
-
});
|
|
487
|
-
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
488
|
-
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
489
|
-
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
490
|
-
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
491
|
-
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
492
|
-
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
493
|
-
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
494
|
-
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
495
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
496
|
-
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
497
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
498
|
-
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
499
|
-
try {
|
|
500
|
-
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
501
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
502
|
-
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
503
|
-
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
504
|
-
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
505
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
506
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
507
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
508
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
509
|
-
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
510
|
-
});
|
|
511
|
-
return {
|
|
512
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
513
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
514
|
-
};
|
|
515
|
-
}
|
|
516
|
-
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
517
|
-
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
518
|
-
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
519
|
-
...proposalInfo,
|
|
520
|
-
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
521
|
-
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
522
|
-
});
|
|
523
|
-
return {
|
|
524
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
525
|
-
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
526
|
-
};
|
|
527
|
-
}
|
|
528
|
-
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
529
|
-
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
530
|
-
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
531
|
-
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
532
|
-
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
533
|
-
checkpointOutHash
|
|
534
|
-
]);
|
|
535
|
-
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
536
|
-
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
537
|
-
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
538
|
-
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
539
|
-
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
540
|
-
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
541
|
-
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
542
|
-
...proposalInfo
|
|
543
|
-
});
|
|
544
|
-
return {
|
|
545
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
546
|
-
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
547
|
-
};
|
|
548
|
-
}
|
|
549
|
-
// Final round of validations on the checkpoint, just in case.
|
|
550
|
-
try {
|
|
551
|
-
validateCheckpoint(computedCheckpoint, {
|
|
552
|
-
rollupManaLimit: this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig().rollupManaLimit,
|
|
553
|
-
maxDABlockGas: this.config.validateMaxDABlockGas,
|
|
554
|
-
maxL2BlockGas: this.config.validateMaxL2BlockGas,
|
|
555
|
-
maxTxsPerBlock: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerBlock,
|
|
556
|
-
maxTxsPerCheckpoint: this.config.validateMaxTxsPerCheckpoint
|
|
557
|
-
});
|
|
558
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
559
|
-
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint validation failed: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
560
|
-
return {
|
|
561
|
-
isValid: false,
|
|
562
|
-
reason: 'checkpoint_validation_failed'
|
|
563
|
-
};
|
|
564
|
-
}
|
|
565
|
-
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
566
|
-
return {
|
|
567
|
-
isValid: true
|
|
568
|
-
};
|
|
569
|
-
} finally{
|
|
570
|
-
await fork.close();
|
|
571
|
-
}
|
|
572
|
-
}
|
|
573
|
-
/**
|
|
574
|
-
* Extract checkpoint global variables from a block.
|
|
575
|
-
*/ extractCheckpointConstants(block) {
|
|
576
|
-
const gv = block.header.globalVariables;
|
|
577
|
-
return {
|
|
578
|
-
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
579
|
-
version: gv.version,
|
|
580
|
-
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
581
|
-
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
582
|
-
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
583
|
-
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
584
|
-
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
585
|
-
};
|
|
586
|
-
}
|
|
587
|
-
/**
|
|
588
460
|
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
589
461
|
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
590
462
|
try {
|
|
591
|
-
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.
|
|
463
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = (await this.blockSource.getBlockData({
|
|
464
|
+
archive: proposal.archive
|
|
465
|
+
}))?.header;
|
|
592
466
|
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
593
467
|
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
594
468
|
return;
|
|
@@ -616,11 +490,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
616
490
|
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash proposal with invalid signature`);
|
|
617
491
|
return;
|
|
618
492
|
}
|
|
619
|
-
// Trim the set if it's too big.
|
|
620
|
-
if (this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.size > MAX_PROPOSERS_OF_INVALID_BLOCKS) {
|
|
621
|
-
// remove oldest proposer. `values` is guaranteed to be in insertion order.
|
|
622
|
-
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.delete(this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.values().next().value);
|
|
623
|
-
}
|
|
624
493
|
this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks.add(proposer.toString());
|
|
625
494
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
626
495
|
{
|
|
@@ -631,17 +500,122 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
631
500
|
}
|
|
632
501
|
]);
|
|
633
502
|
}
|
|
503
|
+
handleInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal, result, proposalInfo) {
|
|
504
|
+
if (!SLASHABLE_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT[result.reason]) {
|
|
505
|
+
return;
|
|
506
|
+
}
|
|
507
|
+
// The slot is already marked invalid by the all-nodes checkpoint handler that invokes this callback,
|
|
508
|
+
// so we only emit the proposer slash event here.
|
|
509
|
+
if (this.slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal)) {
|
|
510
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
511
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
512
|
+
reason: result.reason,
|
|
513
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
514
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
515
|
+
});
|
|
516
|
+
}
|
|
517
|
+
}
|
|
518
|
+
slashInvalidCheckpointProposal(proposal) {
|
|
519
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
520
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
521
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint proposal with invalid signature`, {
|
|
522
|
+
slotNumber: proposal.slotNumber,
|
|
523
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
524
|
+
});
|
|
525
|
+
return false;
|
|
526
|
+
}
|
|
527
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL;
|
|
528
|
+
const offenseKey = `${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${proposal.slotNumber}`;
|
|
529
|
+
if (!this.invalidCheckpointProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
530
|
+
return false;
|
|
531
|
+
}
|
|
532
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
533
|
+
{
|
|
534
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
535
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
536
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
537
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(proposal.slotNumber)
|
|
538
|
+
}
|
|
539
|
+
]);
|
|
540
|
+
return true;
|
|
541
|
+
}
|
|
542
|
+
markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
543
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markInvalidProposalSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
544
|
+
}
|
|
545
|
+
handleCheckpointAttestation(attestation) {
|
|
546
|
+
const slotNumber = attestation.slotNumber;
|
|
547
|
+
if (!this.proposalHandler.hasInvalidProposals(slotNumber) || this.proposalHandler.hasProposalEquivocation(slotNumber)) {
|
|
548
|
+
return;
|
|
549
|
+
}
|
|
550
|
+
const attester = attestation.getSender();
|
|
551
|
+
if (!attester) {
|
|
552
|
+
this.log.warn(`Cannot slash checkpoint attestation with invalid signature`, {
|
|
553
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
554
|
+
archive: attestation.archive.toString()
|
|
555
|
+
});
|
|
556
|
+
return;
|
|
557
|
+
}
|
|
558
|
+
this.slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester);
|
|
559
|
+
}
|
|
560
|
+
slashAttestedToInvalidCheckpointProposal(slotNumber, attester) {
|
|
561
|
+
const offenseKey = `${attester.toString()}:${OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL}:${slotNumber}`;
|
|
562
|
+
if (!this.badAttestationOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(offenseKey)) {
|
|
563
|
+
return;
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
565
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected attestation to invalid checkpoint proposal offense`, {
|
|
566
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
567
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
568
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
569
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL)
|
|
570
|
+
});
|
|
571
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
572
|
+
{
|
|
573
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
574
|
+
amount: this.config.slashAttestInvalidCheckpointProposalPenalty,
|
|
575
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
576
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slotNumber)
|
|
577
|
+
}
|
|
578
|
+
]);
|
|
579
|
+
}
|
|
580
|
+
/**
|
|
581
|
+
* Handle detection of an oversized block proposal: one whose index within its checkpoint lands at or
|
|
582
|
+
* beyond the consensus per-checkpoint block limit. A single signed proposal at an illegal index is
|
|
583
|
+
* self-contained evidence, so emit an invalid-block-proposal slash event for the proposer, deduped per
|
|
584
|
+
* (proposer, slot) since the p2p layer reports every oversized proposal it stores.
|
|
585
|
+
*/ handleOversizedProposal(info) {
|
|
586
|
+
const { slot, proposer } = info;
|
|
587
|
+
const offenseType = OffenseType.BROADCASTED_INVALID_BLOCK_PROPOSAL;
|
|
588
|
+
if (!this.oversizedProposalOffenseKeys.addIfAbsent(`${proposer.toString()}:${offenseType}:${slot}`)) {
|
|
589
|
+
return;
|
|
590
|
+
}
|
|
591
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected oversized block proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
592
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
593
|
+
slot,
|
|
594
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
595
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(offenseType)
|
|
596
|
+
});
|
|
597
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
598
|
+
{
|
|
599
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
600
|
+
amount: this.config.slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty,
|
|
601
|
+
offenseType,
|
|
602
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
603
|
+
}
|
|
604
|
+
]);
|
|
605
|
+
}
|
|
634
606
|
/**
|
|
635
607
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
636
608
|
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
637
609
|
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
638
610
|
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
639
|
-
this.
|
|
611
|
+
this.proposalHandler.markProposalEquivocation(slot);
|
|
612
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate ${type} proposal offense from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
640
613
|
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
641
614
|
slot,
|
|
642
|
-
type
|
|
615
|
+
type,
|
|
616
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
617
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL)
|
|
643
618
|
});
|
|
644
|
-
// Emit slash event
|
|
645
619
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
646
620
|
{
|
|
647
621
|
validator: proposer,
|
|
@@ -650,15 +624,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
650
624
|
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
651
625
|
}
|
|
652
626
|
]);
|
|
627
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_CLEAR_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
628
|
+
{
|
|
629
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.ATTESTED_TO_INVALID_CHECKPOINT_PROPOSAL,
|
|
630
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
631
|
+
}
|
|
632
|
+
]);
|
|
653
633
|
}
|
|
654
634
|
/**
|
|
655
635
|
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
656
636
|
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
657
637
|
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
658
638
|
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
659
|
-
this.log.
|
|
639
|
+
this.log.info(`Detected duplicate attestation offense from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
660
640
|
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
661
|
-
slot
|
|
641
|
+
slot,
|
|
642
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
643
|
+
offenseType: getOffenseTypeName(OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION)
|
|
662
644
|
});
|
|
663
645
|
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
664
646
|
{
|
|
@@ -669,7 +651,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
669
651
|
}
|
|
670
652
|
]);
|
|
671
653
|
}
|
|
672
|
-
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
654
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
673
655
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
674
656
|
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
675
657
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -680,14 +662,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
680
662
|
}
|
|
681
663
|
}
|
|
682
664
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
683
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
665
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, checkpointNumber, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
684
666
|
...options,
|
|
685
|
-
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
667
|
+
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: options.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal || this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
686
668
|
});
|
|
687
669
|
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
688
670
|
return newProposal;
|
|
689
671
|
}
|
|
690
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
672
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
691
673
|
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
692
674
|
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
693
675
|
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
@@ -697,23 +679,30 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
697
679
|
}
|
|
698
680
|
}
|
|
699
681
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
700
|
-
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier,
|
|
682
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, checkpointNumber, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockProposal, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
701
683
|
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
684
|
+
// Self-record this slot's outcome on the re-execution tracker. Proposers don't run their
|
|
685
|
+
// own proposals through `handleCheckpointProposal`, so without this call the proposer's
|
|
686
|
+
// sentinel would see no outcome for slots it proposed and would mis-attribute itself as
|
|
687
|
+
// inactive. We pass the locally-computed `archive` (not `newProposal.archive`, which may
|
|
688
|
+
// be intentionally corrupted under test-only flags); from the proposer's local-view
|
|
689
|
+
// perspective the work it just completed is valid by definition.
|
|
690
|
+
this.proposalHandler.recordOwnCheckpointProposalAsValid(checkpointHeader.slotNumber, archive, checkpointNumber);
|
|
702
691
|
return newProposal;
|
|
703
692
|
}
|
|
704
693
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
705
694
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
706
695
|
}
|
|
707
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
708
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot,
|
|
696
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
697
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, checkpointNumber);
|
|
709
698
|
}
|
|
710
|
-
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
699
|
+
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
711
700
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
712
701
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
713
702
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
714
703
|
inCommittee
|
|
715
704
|
});
|
|
716
|
-
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
705
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee, checkpointNumber);
|
|
717
706
|
if (!attestations) {
|
|
718
707
|
return [];
|
|
719
708
|
}
|
|
@@ -725,7 +714,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
725
714
|
});
|
|
726
715
|
return attestations;
|
|
727
716
|
}
|
|
728
|
-
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
717
|
+
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline, checkpointNumber) {
|
|
729
718
|
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
730
719
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
731
720
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
@@ -733,28 +722,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
733
722
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
734
723
|
throw new AttestationTimeoutError(0, required, slot);
|
|
735
724
|
}
|
|
736
|
-
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal);
|
|
737
|
-
const
|
|
725
|
+
await this.collectOwnAttestations(proposal, checkpointNumber);
|
|
726
|
+
const proposalPayloadHash = proposal.getPayloadHash();
|
|
738
727
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
739
728
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
740
729
|
while(true){
|
|
741
|
-
//
|
|
742
|
-
//
|
|
743
|
-
|
|
744
|
-
|
|
745
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
746
|
-
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
747
|
-
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
748
|
-
});
|
|
749
|
-
return false;
|
|
750
|
-
}
|
|
751
|
-
return true;
|
|
752
|
-
});
|
|
730
|
+
// The pool already filters by proposal payload hash; if any attestation slips through with a
|
|
731
|
+
// mismatched payload hash, drop it defensively. Equivocations are emitted as separate slash
|
|
732
|
+
// events from libp2p_service.
|
|
733
|
+
const collectedAttestations = await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalPayloadHash);
|
|
753
734
|
// Log new attestations we collected
|
|
754
735
|
const oldSenders = attestations.map((attestation)=>attestation.getSender());
|
|
755
736
|
for (const collected of collectedAttestations){
|
|
756
737
|
const collectedSender = collected.getSender();
|
|
757
|
-
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures
|
|
738
|
+
// Skip attestations with invalid signatures. Should not happen as we don't add invalid attestations to our pool.
|
|
758
739
|
if (!collectedSender) {
|
|
759
740
|
this.log.warn(`Skipping attestation with invalid signature for slot ${slot}`);
|
|
760
741
|
continue;
|