@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.179ed20 → 0.0.1-commit.181e2d196
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +21 -18
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +20 -34
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +8 -5
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +28 -18
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +5 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +2 -2
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +3 -3
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +2 -1
- package/dest/index.d.ts +1 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +0 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +2 -2
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +9 -1
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +12 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +35 -8
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +179 -29
- package/package.json +19 -19
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +28 -48
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +23 -6
- package/src/config.ts +5 -1
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +9 -2
- package/src/factory.ts +1 -0
- package/src/index.ts +0 -1
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +2 -2
- package/src/metrics.ts +18 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +234 -35
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +0 -3
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +0 -2
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +0 -24
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +0 -19
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +0 -1
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +0 -54
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +0 -2
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +0 -30
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +0 -154
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
-
import {
|
|
2
|
+
import { validateFeeAssetPriceModifier } from '@aztec/ethereum/contracts';
|
|
3
|
+
import { BlockNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
4
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
4
5
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
6
|
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
@@ -8,7 +9,7 @@ import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
|
8
9
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
9
10
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
10
11
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
|
-
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
13
|
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
13
14
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
14
15
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
41
42
|
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
42
43
|
config;
|
|
43
44
|
blobClient;
|
|
45
|
+
haSigner;
|
|
44
46
|
dateProvider;
|
|
45
47
|
tracer;
|
|
46
48
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -48,13 +50,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
48
50
|
log;
|
|
49
51
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
50
52
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
54
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
53
55
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
54
56
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
57
|
+
/** Tracks the last epoch in which each attester successfully submitted at least one attestation. */ lastAttestedEpochByAttester;
|
|
55
58
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
59
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
60
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, haSigner, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
61
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.haSigner = haSigner, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester = new Map(), this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
58
62
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
59
63
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
60
64
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -93,6 +97,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
93
97
|
this.log.trace(`No committee found for slot`);
|
|
94
98
|
return;
|
|
95
99
|
}
|
|
100
|
+
this.metrics.setCurrentEpoch(epoch);
|
|
96
101
|
if (epoch !== this.lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop) {
|
|
97
102
|
const me = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
98
103
|
const committeeSet = new Set(committee.map((v)=>v.toString()));
|
|
@@ -111,20 +116,27 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
111
116
|
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
112
117
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
113
118
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
114
|
-
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
119
|
+
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions,
|
|
120
|
+
maxTxsPerBlock: config.maxTxsPerBlock
|
|
115
121
|
});
|
|
116
122
|
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
123
|
+
const nodeKeystoreAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
124
|
+
let validatorKeyStore = nodeKeystoreAdapter;
|
|
125
|
+
let haSigner;
|
|
118
126
|
if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
119
127
|
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
120
128
|
const haConfig = {
|
|
121
129
|
...config,
|
|
122
130
|
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
123
131
|
};
|
|
124
|
-
const { signer } = await createHASigner(haConfig
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
132
|
+
const { signer } = await createHASigner(haConfig, {
|
|
133
|
+
telemetryClient: telemetry,
|
|
134
|
+
dateProvider
|
|
135
|
+
});
|
|
136
|
+
haSigner = signer;
|
|
137
|
+
validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(nodeKeystoreAdapter, signer);
|
|
126
138
|
}
|
|
127
|
-
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
139
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, haSigner, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
128
140
|
return validator;
|
|
129
141
|
}
|
|
130
142
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -151,6 +163,20 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
151
163
|
...config
|
|
152
164
|
};
|
|
153
165
|
}
|
|
166
|
+
reloadKeystore(newManager) {
|
|
167
|
+
if (this.config.haSigningEnabled && !this.haSigner) {
|
|
168
|
+
this.log.warn('HA signing is enabled in config but was not initialized at startup. ' + 'Restart the node to enable HA signing.');
|
|
169
|
+
} else if (!this.config.haSigningEnabled && this.haSigner) {
|
|
170
|
+
this.log.warn('HA signing was disabled via config update but the HA signer is still active. ' + 'Restart the node to fully disable HA signing.');
|
|
171
|
+
}
|
|
172
|
+
const newAdapter = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(newManager);
|
|
173
|
+
if (this.haSigner) {
|
|
174
|
+
this.keyStore = new HAKeyStore(newAdapter, this.haSigner);
|
|
175
|
+
} else {
|
|
176
|
+
this.keyStore = newAdapter;
|
|
177
|
+
}
|
|
178
|
+
this.validationService = new ValidationService(this.keyStore, this.log.createChild('validation-service'));
|
|
179
|
+
}
|
|
154
180
|
async start() {
|
|
155
181
|
if (this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.isRunning()) {
|
|
156
182
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
@@ -183,6 +209,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
183
209
|
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
184
210
|
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
185
211
|
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
212
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
213
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
214
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
215
|
+
});
|
|
216
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
217
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
218
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
219
|
+
});
|
|
186
220
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
187
221
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
188
222
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
@@ -203,6 +237,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
203
237
|
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
204
238
|
return false;
|
|
205
239
|
}
|
|
240
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
241
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
242
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
243
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
244
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
245
|
+
});
|
|
246
|
+
return false;
|
|
247
|
+
}
|
|
206
248
|
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
207
249
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
208
250
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -274,6 +316,19 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
274
316
|
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
275
317
|
return undefined;
|
|
276
318
|
}
|
|
319
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
320
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
321
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
322
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
323
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
324
|
+
});
|
|
325
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
326
|
+
}
|
|
327
|
+
// Validate fee asset price modifier is within allowed range
|
|
328
|
+
if (!validateFeeAssetPriceModifier(proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier)) {
|
|
329
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid feeAssetPriceModifier ${proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier} for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
330
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
331
|
+
}
|
|
277
332
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
278
333
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
279
334
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
@@ -315,6 +370,16 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
315
370
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
316
371
|
});
|
|
317
372
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
373
|
+
// Track epoch participation per attester: count each (attester, epoch) pair at most once
|
|
374
|
+
const proposalEpoch = getEpochAtSlot(slotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
375
|
+
for (const attester of inCommittee){
|
|
376
|
+
const key = attester.toString();
|
|
377
|
+
const lastEpoch = this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.get(key);
|
|
378
|
+
if (lastEpoch === undefined || proposalEpoch > lastEpoch) {
|
|
379
|
+
this.lastAttestedEpochByAttester.set(key, proposalEpoch);
|
|
380
|
+
this.metrics.incAttestedEpochCount(attester);
|
|
381
|
+
}
|
|
382
|
+
}
|
|
318
383
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
319
384
|
let attestors;
|
|
320
385
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -337,11 +402,32 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
337
402
|
});
|
|
338
403
|
return undefined;
|
|
339
404
|
}
|
|
340
|
-
return this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
405
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
406
|
+
}
|
|
407
|
+
/**
|
|
408
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
409
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
410
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
411
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
412
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
413
|
+
return true;
|
|
414
|
+
}
|
|
415
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
416
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
417
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
418
|
+
return false;
|
|
419
|
+
}
|
|
420
|
+
return true;
|
|
341
421
|
}
|
|
342
422
|
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
423
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
424
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
425
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
426
|
+
}
|
|
343
427
|
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
344
|
-
|
|
428
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
429
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
430
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
345
431
|
return attestations;
|
|
346
432
|
}
|
|
347
433
|
/**
|
|
@@ -349,7 +435,10 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
349
435
|
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
350
436
|
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
351
437
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
438
|
+
// Timeout block syncing at the start of the next slot
|
|
439
|
+
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
440
|
+
const nextSlotTimestampSeconds = Number(getTimestampForSlot(SlotNumber(slot + 1), config));
|
|
441
|
+
const timeoutSeconds = Math.max(1, nextSlotTimestampSeconds - Math.floor(this.dateProvider.now() / 1000));
|
|
353
442
|
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
354
443
|
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
355
444
|
try {
|
|
@@ -387,6 +476,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
387
476
|
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
388
477
|
};
|
|
389
478
|
}
|
|
479
|
+
// Ensure the last block for this slot matches the archive in the checkpoint proposal
|
|
480
|
+
if (!blocks.at(-1)?.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
481
|
+
this.log.warn(`Last block archive mismatch for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
482
|
+
return {
|
|
483
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
484
|
+
reason: 'last_block_archive_mismatch'
|
|
485
|
+
};
|
|
486
|
+
}
|
|
390
487
|
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
391
488
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
392
489
|
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
@@ -397,18 +494,15 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
397
494
|
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
398
495
|
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
399
496
|
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
400
|
-
//
|
|
401
|
-
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
402
|
-
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
497
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
403
498
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
404
|
-
const
|
|
405
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
499
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch)).filter((c)=>c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber).map((c)=>c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
406
500
|
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
407
501
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
408
502
|
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
409
503
|
try {
|
|
410
504
|
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
411
|
-
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
505
|
+
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, proposal.feeAssetPriceModifier, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
412
506
|
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
413
507
|
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
414
508
|
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
@@ -472,6 +566,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
472
566
|
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
473
567
|
version: gv.version,
|
|
474
568
|
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
569
|
+
timestamp: gv.timestamp,
|
|
475
570
|
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
476
571
|
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
477
572
|
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
@@ -492,7 +587,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
492
587
|
return;
|
|
493
588
|
}
|
|
494
589
|
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
495
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
590
|
+
const blobs = await getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
496
591
|
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
497
592
|
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
498
593
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
@@ -524,23 +619,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
524
619
|
}
|
|
525
620
|
]);
|
|
526
621
|
}
|
|
622
|
+
/**
|
|
623
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
624
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
625
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
626
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
627
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
628
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
629
|
+
slot,
|
|
630
|
+
type
|
|
631
|
+
});
|
|
632
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
633
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
634
|
+
{
|
|
635
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
636
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
637
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
638
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
639
|
+
}
|
|
640
|
+
]);
|
|
641
|
+
}
|
|
642
|
+
/**
|
|
643
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
644
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
645
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
646
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
647
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
648
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
649
|
+
slot
|
|
650
|
+
});
|
|
651
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
652
|
+
{
|
|
653
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
654
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
655
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
656
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
657
|
+
}
|
|
658
|
+
]);
|
|
659
|
+
}
|
|
527
660
|
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
528
|
-
//
|
|
529
|
-
|
|
530
|
-
|
|
531
|
-
|
|
532
|
-
|
|
661
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
662
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
663
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
664
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
665
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
666
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
667
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
668
|
+
}
|
|
669
|
+
}
|
|
533
670
|
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
534
671
|
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
535
672
|
...options,
|
|
536
673
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
537
674
|
});
|
|
538
|
-
this.
|
|
675
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
539
676
|
return newProposal;
|
|
540
677
|
}
|
|
541
|
-
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
678
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
679
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
680
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
681
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
682
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
683
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
684
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
685
|
+
}
|
|
686
|
+
}
|
|
542
687
|
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
543
|
-
|
|
688
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, feeAssetPriceModifier, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
689
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
690
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
544
691
|
}
|
|
545
692
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
546
693
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
@@ -555,6 +702,9 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
555
702
|
inCommittee
|
|
556
703
|
});
|
|
557
704
|
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
705
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
706
|
+
return [];
|
|
707
|
+
}
|
|
558
708
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
559
709
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
560
710
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@aztec/validator-client",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
4
4
|
"main": "dest/index.js",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -64,30 +64,30 @@
|
|
|
64
64
|
]
|
|
65
65
|
},
|
|
66
66
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
67
|
-
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
68
|
-
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
69
|
-
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
70
|
-
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
71
|
-
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
72
|
-
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
73
|
-
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
74
|
-
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
75
|
-
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
76
|
-
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
77
|
-
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
78
|
-
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
79
|
-
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
80
|
-
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
81
|
-
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
82
|
-
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
67
|
+
"@aztec/blob-client": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
68
|
+
"@aztec/blob-lib": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
69
|
+
"@aztec/constants": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
70
|
+
"@aztec/epoch-cache": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
71
|
+
"@aztec/ethereum": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
72
|
+
"@aztec/foundation": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
73
|
+
"@aztec/node-keystore": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
74
|
+
"@aztec/noir-protocol-circuits-types": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
75
|
+
"@aztec/p2p": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
76
|
+
"@aztec/protocol-contracts": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
77
|
+
"@aztec/prover-client": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
78
|
+
"@aztec/simulator": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
79
|
+
"@aztec/slasher": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
80
|
+
"@aztec/stdlib": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
81
|
+
"@aztec/telemetry-client": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
82
|
+
"@aztec/validator-ha-signer": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
83
83
|
"koa": "^2.16.1",
|
|
84
84
|
"koa-router": "^13.1.1",
|
|
85
85
|
"tslib": "^2.4.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"viem": "npm:@aztec/viem@2.38.2"
|
|
87
87
|
},
|
|
88
88
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
89
|
-
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
90
|
-
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.
|
|
89
|
+
"@aztec/archiver": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
90
|
+
"@aztec/world-state": "0.0.1-commit.181e2d196",
|
|
91
91
|
"@electric-sql/pglite": "^0.3.14",
|
|
92
92
|
"@jest/globals": "^30.0.0",
|
|
93
93
|
"@types/jest": "^30.0.0",
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM } from '@aztec/constants';
|
|
2
2
|
import type { EpochCache } from '@aztec/epoch-cache';
|
|
3
3
|
import { BlockNumber, CheckpointNumber, SlotNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
4
|
-
import { chunkBy } from '@aztec/foundation/collection';
|
|
5
4
|
import { Fr } from '@aztec/foundation/curves/bn254';
|
|
6
5
|
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
7
6
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
@@ -9,16 +8,12 @@ import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
|
9
8
|
import { DateProvider, Timer } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
10
9
|
import type { P2P, PeerId } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
11
10
|
import { BlockProposalValidator } from '@aztec/p2p/msg_validators';
|
|
12
|
-
import type { L2Block, L2BlockSink, L2BlockSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/block';
|
|
11
|
+
import type { BlockData, L2Block, L2BlockSink, L2BlockSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/block';
|
|
13
12
|
import { getEpochAtSlot, getTimestampForSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
14
13
|
import type { ITxProvider, ValidatorClientFullConfig, WorldStateSynchronizer } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
|
|
15
|
-
import {
|
|
16
|
-
type L1ToL2MessageSource,
|
|
17
|
-
computeCheckpointOutHash,
|
|
18
|
-
computeInHashFromL1ToL2Messages,
|
|
19
|
-
} from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
14
|
+
import { type L1ToL2MessageSource, computeInHashFromL1ToL2Messages } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
20
15
|
import type { BlockProposal } from '@aztec/stdlib/p2p';
|
|
21
|
-
import {
|
|
16
|
+
import type { CheckpointGlobalVariables, FailedTx, Tx } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
|
|
22
17
|
import {
|
|
23
18
|
ReExFailedTxsError,
|
|
24
19
|
ReExStateMismatchError,
|
|
@@ -153,16 +148,16 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
153
148
|
}
|
|
154
149
|
|
|
155
150
|
// Check that the parent proposal is a block we know, otherwise reexecution would fail
|
|
156
|
-
const
|
|
157
|
-
if (
|
|
151
|
+
const parentBlock = await this.getParentBlock(proposal);
|
|
152
|
+
if (parentBlock === undefined) {
|
|
158
153
|
this.log.warn(`Parent block for proposal not found, skipping processing`, proposalInfo);
|
|
159
154
|
return { isValid: false, reason: 'parent_block_not_found' };
|
|
160
155
|
}
|
|
161
156
|
|
|
162
157
|
// Check that the parent block's slot is not greater than the proposal's slot.
|
|
163
|
-
if (
|
|
158
|
+
if (parentBlock !== 'genesis' && parentBlock.header.getSlot() > slotNumber) {
|
|
164
159
|
this.log.warn(`Parent block slot is greater than proposal slot, skipping processing`, {
|
|
165
|
-
parentBlockSlot:
|
|
160
|
+
parentBlockSlot: parentBlock.header.getSlot().toString(),
|
|
166
161
|
proposalSlot: slotNumber.toString(),
|
|
167
162
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
168
163
|
});
|
|
@@ -171,9 +166,9 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
171
166
|
|
|
172
167
|
// Compute the block number based on the parent block
|
|
173
168
|
const blockNumber =
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
169
|
+
parentBlock === 'genesis'
|
|
175
170
|
? BlockNumber(INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM)
|
|
176
|
-
: BlockNumber(
|
|
171
|
+
: BlockNumber(parentBlock.header.getBlockNumber() + 1);
|
|
177
172
|
|
|
178
173
|
// Check that this block number does not exist already
|
|
179
174
|
const existingBlock = await this.blockSource.getBlockHeader(blockNumber);
|
|
@@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
190
185
|
});
|
|
191
186
|
|
|
192
187
|
// Compute the checkpoint number for this block and validate checkpoint consistency
|
|
193
|
-
const checkpointResult =
|
|
188
|
+
const checkpointResult = this.computeCheckpointNumber(proposal, parentBlock, proposalInfo);
|
|
194
189
|
if (checkpointResult.reason) {
|
|
195
190
|
return { isValid: false, blockNumber, reason: checkpointResult.reason };
|
|
196
191
|
}
|
|
@@ -218,17 +213,11 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
218
213
|
// Try re-executing the transactions in the proposal if needed
|
|
219
214
|
let reexecutionResult;
|
|
220
215
|
if (shouldReexecute) {
|
|
221
|
-
//
|
|
222
|
-
// TODO(leila/mbps): There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out
|
|
223
|
-
// hashes without having to fetch all the blocks.
|
|
216
|
+
// Collect the out hashes of all the checkpoints before this one in the same epoch
|
|
224
217
|
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slotNumber, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
225
|
-
const
|
|
226
|
-
.filter(
|
|
227
|
-
.
|
|
228
|
-
const blocksByCheckpoint = chunkBy(checkpointedBlocks, b => b.checkpointNumber);
|
|
229
|
-
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = blocksByCheckpoint.map(checkpointBlocks =>
|
|
230
|
-
computeCheckpointOutHash(checkpointBlocks.map(b => b.block.body.txEffects.map(tx => tx.l2ToL1Msgs))),
|
|
231
|
-
);
|
|
218
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsDataForEpoch(epoch))
|
|
219
|
+
.filter(c => c.checkpointNumber < checkpointNumber)
|
|
220
|
+
.map(c => c.checkpointOutHash);
|
|
232
221
|
|
|
233
222
|
try {
|
|
234
223
|
this.log.verbose(`Re-executing transactions in the proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -260,7 +249,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
260
249
|
return { isValid: true, blockNumber, reexecutionResult };
|
|
261
250
|
}
|
|
262
251
|
|
|
263
|
-
private async getParentBlock(proposal: BlockProposal): Promise<'genesis' |
|
|
252
|
+
private async getParentBlock(proposal: BlockProposal): Promise<'genesis' | BlockData | undefined> {
|
|
264
253
|
const parentArchive = proposal.blockHeader.lastArchive.root;
|
|
265
254
|
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
266
255
|
const config = this.checkpointsBuilder.getConfig();
|
|
@@ -276,12 +265,11 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
276
265
|
|
|
277
266
|
try {
|
|
278
267
|
return (
|
|
279
|
-
(await this.blockSource.
|
|
268
|
+
(await this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(parentArchive)) ??
|
|
280
269
|
(timeoutDurationMs <= 0
|
|
281
270
|
? undefined
|
|
282
271
|
: await retryUntil(
|
|
283
|
-
() =>
|
|
284
|
-
this.blockSource.syncImmediate().then(() => this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(parentArchive)),
|
|
272
|
+
() => this.blockSource.syncImmediate().then(() => this.blockSource.getBlockDataByArchive(parentArchive)),
|
|
285
273
|
'force archiver sync',
|
|
286
274
|
timeoutDurationMs / 1000,
|
|
287
275
|
0.5,
|
|
@@ -297,12 +285,12 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
297
285
|
}
|
|
298
286
|
}
|
|
299
287
|
|
|
300
|
-
private
|
|
288
|
+
private computeCheckpointNumber(
|
|
301
289
|
proposal: BlockProposal,
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
290
|
+
parentBlock: 'genesis' | BlockData,
|
|
303
291
|
proposalInfo: object,
|
|
304
|
-
):
|
|
305
|
-
if (
|
|
292
|
+
): CheckpointComputationResult {
|
|
293
|
+
if (parentBlock === 'genesis') {
|
|
306
294
|
// First block is in checkpoint 1
|
|
307
295
|
if (proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint !== 0) {
|
|
308
296
|
this.log.warn(`First block proposal has non-zero indexWithinCheckpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
@@ -311,19 +299,9 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
311
299
|
return { checkpointNumber: CheckpointNumber.INITIAL };
|
|
312
300
|
}
|
|
313
301
|
|
|
314
|
-
// Get the parent block to find its checkpoint number
|
|
315
|
-
// TODO(palla/mbps): The block header should include the checkpoint number to avoid this lookup,
|
|
316
|
-
// or at least the L2BlockSource should return a different struct that includes it.
|
|
317
|
-
const parentBlockNumber = parentBlockHeader.getBlockNumber();
|
|
318
|
-
const parentBlock = await this.blockSource.getL2Block(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
319
|
-
if (!parentBlock) {
|
|
320
|
-
this.log.warn(`Parent block ${parentBlockNumber} not found in archiver`, proposalInfo);
|
|
321
|
-
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
322
|
-
}
|
|
323
|
-
|
|
324
302
|
if (proposal.indexWithinCheckpoint === 0) {
|
|
325
303
|
// If this is the first block in a new checkpoint, increment the checkpoint number
|
|
326
|
-
if (!(proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() >
|
|
304
|
+
if (!(proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() > parentBlock.header.getSlot())) {
|
|
327
305
|
this.log.warn(`Slot should be greater than parent block slot for first block in checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
328
306
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
329
307
|
}
|
|
@@ -335,7 +313,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
335
313
|
this.log.warn(`Non-sequential indexWithinCheckpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
336
314
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
337
315
|
}
|
|
338
|
-
if (proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() !==
|
|
316
|
+
if (proposal.blockHeader.getSlot() !== parentBlock.header.getSlot()) {
|
|
339
317
|
this.log.warn(`Slot should be equal to parent block slot for non-first block in checkpoint`, proposalInfo);
|
|
340
318
|
return { reason: 'invalid_proposal' };
|
|
341
319
|
}
|
|
@@ -356,7 +334,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
356
334
|
*/
|
|
357
335
|
private validateNonFirstBlockInCheckpoint(
|
|
358
336
|
proposal: BlockProposal,
|
|
359
|
-
parentBlock:
|
|
337
|
+
parentBlock: BlockData,
|
|
360
338
|
proposalInfo: object,
|
|
361
339
|
): CheckpointComputationResult | undefined {
|
|
362
340
|
const proposalGlobals = proposal.blockHeader.globalVariables;
|
|
@@ -475,13 +453,14 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
475
453
|
// Fork before the block to be built
|
|
476
454
|
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(blockNumber - 1);
|
|
477
455
|
await this.worldState.syncImmediate(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
478
|
-
using fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
456
|
+
await using fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
479
457
|
|
|
480
|
-
// Build checkpoint constants from proposal (excludes blockNumber
|
|
458
|
+
// Build checkpoint constants from proposal (excludes blockNumber which is per-block)
|
|
481
459
|
const constants: CheckpointGlobalVariables = {
|
|
482
460
|
chainId: new Fr(config.l1ChainId),
|
|
483
461
|
version: new Fr(config.rollupVersion),
|
|
484
462
|
slotNumber: slot,
|
|
463
|
+
timestamp: blockHeader.globalVariables.timestamp,
|
|
485
464
|
coinbase: blockHeader.globalVariables.coinbase,
|
|
486
465
|
feeRecipient: blockHeader.globalVariables.feeRecipient,
|
|
487
466
|
gasFees: blockHeader.globalVariables.gasFees,
|
|
@@ -491,6 +470,7 @@ export class BlockProposalHandler {
|
|
|
491
470
|
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(
|
|
492
471
|
checkpointNumber,
|
|
493
472
|
constants,
|
|
473
|
+
0n, // only takes effect in the following checkpoint.
|
|
494
474
|
l1ToL2Messages,
|
|
495
475
|
previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
496
476
|
fork,
|