@aztec/validator-client 0.0.1-commit.03f7ef2 → 0.0.1-commit.08c5969dc
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +285 -0
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts +20 -10
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/block_proposal_handler.js +337 -81
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts +66 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/checkpoint_builder.js +173 -0
- package/dest/config.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +16 -8
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts +41 -12
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/duties/validation_service.js +109 -26
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +13 -10
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +2 -2
- package/dest/index.d.ts +3 -1
- package/dest/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/index.js +2 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts +99 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/ha_key_store.js +208 -0
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/index.js +1 -0
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts +36 -6
- package/dest/key_store/interface.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/local_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts +18 -5
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js +18 -4
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts +10 -5
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/key_store/web3signer_key_store.js +8 -4
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts +4 -3
- package/dest/metrics.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/metrics.js +34 -30
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/index.js +2 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts +14 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.js +24 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts +19 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dest/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.js +54 -0
- package/dest/validator.d.ts +66 -23
- package/dest/validator.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/validator.js +415 -78
- package/package.json +21 -13
- package/src/block_proposal_handler.ts +258 -49
- package/src/checkpoint_builder.ts +314 -0
- package/src/config.ts +15 -7
- package/src/duties/validation_service.ts +153 -31
- package/src/factory.ts +17 -11
- package/src/index.ts +2 -0
- package/src/key_store/ha_key_store.ts +269 -0
- package/src/key_store/index.ts +1 -0
- package/src/key_store/interface.ts +44 -5
- package/src/key_store/local_key_store.ts +13 -4
- package/src/key_store/node_keystore_adapter.ts +27 -4
- package/src/key_store/web3signer_key_store.ts +17 -4
- package/src/metrics.ts +45 -33
- package/src/tx_validator/index.ts +2 -0
- package/src/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts +30 -0
- package/src/tx_validator/tx_validator_factory.ts +154 -0
- package/src/validator.ts +566 -114
package/dest/validator.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,15 +1,23 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
import { getBlobsPerL1Block } from '@aztec/blob-lib';
|
|
2
|
+
import { BlockNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
|
|
3
|
+
import { TimeoutError } from '@aztec/foundation/error';
|
|
2
4
|
import { createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
|
|
5
|
+
import { retryUntil } from '@aztec/foundation/retry';
|
|
3
6
|
import { RunningPromise } from '@aztec/foundation/running-promise';
|
|
4
7
|
import { sleep } from '@aztec/foundation/sleep';
|
|
5
8
|
import { DateProvider } from '@aztec/foundation/timer';
|
|
6
9
|
import { AuthRequest, AuthResponse, BlockProposalValidator, ReqRespSubProtocol } from '@aztec/p2p';
|
|
7
10
|
import { OffenseType, WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT } from '@aztec/slasher';
|
|
11
|
+
import { getEpochAtSlot } from '@aztec/stdlib/epoch-helpers';
|
|
12
|
+
import { accumulateCheckpointOutHashes } from '@aztec/stdlib/messaging';
|
|
8
13
|
import { AttestationTimeoutError } from '@aztec/stdlib/validators';
|
|
9
14
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from '@aztec/telemetry-client';
|
|
15
|
+
import { createHASigner } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/factory';
|
|
16
|
+
import { DutyType } from '@aztec/validator-ha-signer/types';
|
|
10
17
|
import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
|
|
11
18
|
import { BlockProposalHandler } from './block_proposal_handler.js';
|
|
12
19
|
import { ValidationService } from './duties/validation_service.js';
|
|
20
|
+
import { HAKeyStore } from './key_store/ha_key_store.js';
|
|
13
21
|
import { NodeKeystoreAdapter } from './key_store/node_keystore_adapter.js';
|
|
14
22
|
import { ValidatorMetrics } from './metrics.js';
|
|
15
23
|
// We maintain a set of proposers who have proposed invalid blocks.
|
|
@@ -27,8 +35,12 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
27
35
|
epochCache;
|
|
28
36
|
p2pClient;
|
|
29
37
|
blockProposalHandler;
|
|
38
|
+
blockSource;
|
|
39
|
+
checkpointsBuilder;
|
|
40
|
+
worldState;
|
|
41
|
+
l1ToL2MessageSource;
|
|
30
42
|
config;
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
43
|
+
blobClient;
|
|
32
44
|
dateProvider;
|
|
33
45
|
tracer;
|
|
34
46
|
validationService;
|
|
@@ -36,13 +48,14 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
36
48
|
log;
|
|
37
49
|
// Whether it has already registered handlers on the p2p client
|
|
38
50
|
hasRegisteredHandlers;
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
51
|
+
/** Tracks the last block proposal we created, to detect duplicate proposal attempts. */ lastProposedBlock;
|
|
52
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we created. */ lastProposedCheckpoint;
|
|
41
53
|
lastEpochForCommitteeUpdateLoop;
|
|
42
54
|
epochCacheUpdateLoop;
|
|
43
55
|
proposersOfInvalidBlocks;
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
56
|
+
/** Tracks the last checkpoint proposal we attested to, to prevent equivocation. */ lastAttestedProposal;
|
|
57
|
+
constructor(keyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient(), log = createLogger('validator')){
|
|
58
|
+
super(), this.keyStore = keyStore, this.epochCache = epochCache, this.p2pClient = p2pClient, this.blockProposalHandler = blockProposalHandler, this.blockSource = blockSource, this.checkpointsBuilder = checkpointsBuilder, this.worldState = worldState, this.l1ToL2MessageSource = l1ToL2MessageSource, this.config = config, this.blobClient = blobClient, this.dateProvider = dateProvider, this.hasRegisteredHandlers = false, this.proposersOfInvalidBlocks = new Set();
|
|
46
59
|
// Create child logger with fisherman prefix if in fisherman mode
|
|
47
60
|
this.log = config.fishermanMode ? log.createChild('[FISHERMAN]') : log;
|
|
48
61
|
this.tracer = telemetry.getTracer('Validator');
|
|
@@ -96,13 +109,23 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
96
109
|
this.log.error(`Error updating epoch committee`, err);
|
|
97
110
|
}
|
|
98
111
|
}
|
|
99
|
-
static new(config,
|
|
112
|
+
static async new(config, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, epochCache, p2pClient, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, keyStoreManager, blobClient, dateProvider = new DateProvider(), telemetry = getTelemetryClient()) {
|
|
100
113
|
const metrics = new ValidatorMetrics(telemetry);
|
|
101
114
|
const blockProposalValidator = new BlockProposalValidator(epochCache, {
|
|
102
115
|
txsPermitted: !config.disableTransactions
|
|
103
116
|
});
|
|
104
|
-
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
117
|
+
const blockProposalHandler = new BlockProposalHandler(checkpointsBuilder, worldState, blockSource, l1ToL2MessageSource, txProvider, blockProposalValidator, epochCache, config, metrics, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
118
|
+
let validatorKeyStore = NodeKeystoreAdapter.fromKeyStoreManager(keyStoreManager);
|
|
119
|
+
if (config.haSigningEnabled) {
|
|
120
|
+
// If maxStuckDutiesAgeMs is not explicitly set, compute it from Aztec slot duration
|
|
121
|
+
const haConfig = {
|
|
122
|
+
...config,
|
|
123
|
+
maxStuckDutiesAgeMs: config.maxStuckDutiesAgeMs ?? epochCache.getL1Constants().slotDuration * 2 * 1000
|
|
124
|
+
};
|
|
125
|
+
const { signer } = await createHASigner(haConfig);
|
|
126
|
+
validatorKeyStore = new HAKeyStore(validatorKeyStore, signer);
|
|
127
|
+
}
|
|
128
|
+
const validator = new ValidatorClient(validatorKeyStore, epochCache, p2pClient, blockProposalHandler, blockSource, checkpointsBuilder, worldState, l1ToL2MessageSource, config, blobClient, dateProvider, telemetry);
|
|
106
129
|
return validator;
|
|
107
130
|
}
|
|
108
131
|
getValidatorAddresses() {
|
|
@@ -111,12 +134,8 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
111
134
|
getBlockProposalHandler() {
|
|
112
135
|
return this.blockProposalHandler;
|
|
113
136
|
}
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
return this.blockProposalHandler.reexecuteTransactions(proposal, blockNumber, txs, l1ToL2Messages);
|
|
117
|
-
}
|
|
118
|
-
signWithAddress(addr, msg) {
|
|
119
|
-
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg);
|
|
137
|
+
signWithAddress(addr, msg, context) {
|
|
138
|
+
return this.keyStore.signTypedDataWithAddress(addr, msg, context);
|
|
120
139
|
}
|
|
121
140
|
getCoinbaseForAttestor(attestor) {
|
|
122
141
|
return this.keyStore.getCoinbaseAddress(attestor);
|
|
@@ -138,6 +157,7 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
138
157
|
this.log.warn(`Validator client already started`);
|
|
139
158
|
return;
|
|
140
159
|
}
|
|
160
|
+
await this.keyStore.start();
|
|
141
161
|
await this.registerHandlers();
|
|
142
162
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
143
163
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee('now', myAddresses);
|
|
@@ -150,46 +170,75 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
150
170
|
}
|
|
151
171
|
async stop() {
|
|
152
172
|
await this.epochCacheUpdateLoop.stop();
|
|
173
|
+
await this.keyStore.stop();
|
|
153
174
|
}
|
|
154
175
|
/** Register handlers on the p2p client */ async registerHandlers() {
|
|
155
176
|
if (!this.hasRegisteredHandlers) {
|
|
156
177
|
this.hasRegisteredHandlers = true;
|
|
157
178
|
this.log.debug(`Registering validator handlers for p2p client`);
|
|
158
|
-
|
|
159
|
-
this.
|
|
179
|
+
// Block proposal handler - validates but does NOT attest (validators only attest to checkpoints)
|
|
180
|
+
const blockHandler = (block, proposalSender)=>this.validateBlockProposal(block, proposalSender);
|
|
181
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerBlockProposalHandler(blockHandler);
|
|
182
|
+
// Checkpoint proposal handler - validates and creates attestations
|
|
183
|
+
// The checkpoint is received as CheckpointProposalCore since the lastBlock is extracted
|
|
184
|
+
// and processed separately via the block handler above.
|
|
185
|
+
const checkpointHandler = (checkpoint, proposalSender)=>this.attestToCheckpointProposal(checkpoint, proposalSender);
|
|
186
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerCheckpointProposalHandler(checkpointHandler);
|
|
187
|
+
// Duplicate proposal handler - triggers slashing for equivocation
|
|
188
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateProposalCallback((info)=>{
|
|
189
|
+
this.handleDuplicateProposal(info);
|
|
190
|
+
});
|
|
191
|
+
// Duplicate attestation handler - triggers slashing for attestation equivocation
|
|
192
|
+
this.p2pClient.registerDuplicateAttestationCallback((info)=>{
|
|
193
|
+
this.handleDuplicateAttestation(info);
|
|
194
|
+
});
|
|
160
195
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
161
196
|
this.p2pClient.registerThisValidatorAddresses(myAddresses);
|
|
162
197
|
await this.p2pClient.addReqRespSubProtocol(ReqRespSubProtocol.AUTH, this.handleAuthRequest.bind(this));
|
|
163
198
|
}
|
|
164
199
|
}
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
200
|
+
/**
|
|
201
|
+
* Validate a block proposal from a peer.
|
|
202
|
+
* Note: Validators do NOT attest to individual blocks - attestations are only for checkpoint proposals.
|
|
203
|
+
* @returns true if the proposal is valid, false otherwise
|
|
204
|
+
*/ async validateBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender) {
|
|
166
205
|
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
206
|
+
// Note: During escape hatch, we still want to "validate" proposals for observability,
|
|
207
|
+
// but we intentionally reject them and disable slashing invalid block and attestation flow.
|
|
208
|
+
const escapeHatchOpen = await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber);
|
|
167
209
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
168
210
|
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
169
211
|
if (!proposer) {
|
|
170
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
171
|
-
return
|
|
212
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received block proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
213
|
+
return false;
|
|
172
214
|
}
|
|
173
|
-
//
|
|
215
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
216
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
217
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
218
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
219
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
220
|
+
});
|
|
221
|
+
return false;
|
|
222
|
+
}
|
|
223
|
+
// Check if we're in the committee (for metrics purposes)
|
|
174
224
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
175
225
|
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
176
226
|
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
177
227
|
...proposal.toBlockInfo(),
|
|
178
228
|
proposer: proposer.toString()
|
|
179
229
|
};
|
|
180
|
-
this.log.info(`Received proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
230
|
+
this.log.info(`Received block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
181
231
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
182
232
|
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
183
233
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
184
234
|
});
|
|
185
|
-
// Reexecute txs if we are part of the committee
|
|
186
|
-
// invalid proposals even when not in the committee, or if we are configured to always reexecute for monitoring purposes.
|
|
235
|
+
// Reexecute txs if we are part of the committee, or if slashing is enabled, or if we are configured to always reexecute.
|
|
187
236
|
// In fisherman mode, we always reexecute to validate proposals.
|
|
188
237
|
const { validatorReexecute, slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty, alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals, fishermanMode } = this.config;
|
|
189
|
-
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.
|
|
190
|
-
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute);
|
|
238
|
+
const shouldReexecute = fishermanMode || slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n && validatorReexecute || partOfCommittee && validatorReexecute || alwaysReexecuteBlockProposals || this.blobClient.canUpload();
|
|
239
|
+
const validationResult = await this.blockProposalHandler.handleBlockProposal(proposal, proposalSender, !!shouldReexecute && !escapeHatchOpen);
|
|
191
240
|
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
192
|
-
this.log.warn(`
|
|
241
|
+
this.log.warn(`Block proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
193
242
|
const reason = validationResult.reason || 'unknown';
|
|
194
243
|
// Classify failure reason: bad proposal vs node issue
|
|
195
244
|
const badProposalReasons = [
|
|
@@ -202,43 +251,95 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
202
251
|
if (badProposalReasons.includes(reason)) {
|
|
203
252
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsBadProposal(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
204
253
|
} else {
|
|
205
|
-
// Node issues so we can't
|
|
254
|
+
// Node issues so we can't validate
|
|
206
255
|
this.metrics.incFailedAttestationsNodeIssue(1, reason, partOfCommittee);
|
|
207
256
|
}
|
|
208
257
|
// Slash invalid block proposals (can happen even when not in committee)
|
|
209
|
-
if (validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason) && slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n) {
|
|
258
|
+
if (!escapeHatchOpen && validationResult.reason && SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT.includes(validationResult.reason) && slashBroadcastedInvalidBlockPenalty > 0n) {
|
|
210
259
|
this.log.warn(`Slashing proposer for invalid block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
211
260
|
this.slashInvalidBlock(proposal);
|
|
212
261
|
}
|
|
262
|
+
return false;
|
|
263
|
+
}
|
|
264
|
+
this.log.info(`Validated block proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
265
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
266
|
+
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
267
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false,
|
|
268
|
+
escapeHatchOpen
|
|
269
|
+
});
|
|
270
|
+
if (escapeHatchOpen) {
|
|
271
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, rejecting block proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
272
|
+
return false;
|
|
273
|
+
}
|
|
274
|
+
return true;
|
|
275
|
+
}
|
|
276
|
+
/**
|
|
277
|
+
* Validate and attest to a checkpoint proposal from a peer.
|
|
278
|
+
* The proposal is received as CheckpointProposalCore (without lastBlock) since
|
|
279
|
+
* the lastBlock is extracted and processed separately via the block handler.
|
|
280
|
+
* @returns Checkpoint attestations if valid, undefined otherwise
|
|
281
|
+
*/ async attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, _proposalSender) {
|
|
282
|
+
const slotNumber = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
283
|
+
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
284
|
+
// If escape hatch is open for this slot's epoch, do not attest.
|
|
285
|
+
if (await this.epochCache.isEscapeHatchOpenAtSlot(slotNumber)) {
|
|
286
|
+
this.log.warn(`Escape hatch open for slot ${slotNumber}, skipping checkpoint attestation handling`);
|
|
287
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
288
|
+
}
|
|
289
|
+
// Reject proposals with invalid signatures
|
|
290
|
+
if (!proposer) {
|
|
291
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received checkpoint proposal with invalid signature for slot ${slotNumber}`);
|
|
292
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
293
|
+
}
|
|
294
|
+
// Ignore proposals from ourselves (may happen in HA setups)
|
|
295
|
+
if (this.getValidatorAddresses().some((addr)=>addr.equals(proposer))) {
|
|
296
|
+
this.log.warn(`Ignoring block proposal from self for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
297
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
298
|
+
slotNumber
|
|
299
|
+
});
|
|
213
300
|
return undefined;
|
|
214
301
|
}
|
|
215
302
|
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
303
|
+
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slotNumber, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
304
|
+
const partOfCommittee = inCommittee.length > 0;
|
|
305
|
+
const proposalInfo = {
|
|
306
|
+
slotNumber,
|
|
307
|
+
archive: proposal.archive.toString(),
|
|
308
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
309
|
+
txCount: proposal.txHashes.length
|
|
310
|
+
};
|
|
311
|
+
this.log.info(`Received checkpoint proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
312
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
313
|
+
txHashes: proposal.txHashes.map((t)=>t.toString()),
|
|
314
|
+
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
315
|
+
});
|
|
316
|
+
// Validate the checkpoint proposal before attesting (unless skipCheckpointProposalValidation is set)
|
|
317
|
+
if (this.config.skipCheckpointProposalValidation) {
|
|
318
|
+
this.log.warn(`Skipping checkpoint proposal validation for slot ${slotNumber}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
319
|
+
} else {
|
|
320
|
+
const validationResult = await this.validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
321
|
+
if (!validationResult.isValid) {
|
|
322
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint proposal validation failed: ${validationResult.reason}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
323
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
324
|
+
}
|
|
325
|
+
}
|
|
326
|
+
// Upload blobs to filestore if we can (fire and forget)
|
|
327
|
+
if (this.blobClient.canUpload()) {
|
|
328
|
+
void this.uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo);
|
|
329
|
+
}
|
|
330
|
+
// Check that I have any address in current committee before attesting
|
|
216
331
|
// In fisherman mode, we still create attestations for validation even if not in committee
|
|
217
332
|
if (!partOfCommittee && !this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
218
333
|
this.log.verbose(`No validator in the current committee, skipping attestation`, proposalInfo);
|
|
219
334
|
return undefined;
|
|
220
335
|
}
|
|
221
336
|
// Provided all of the above checks pass, we can attest to the proposal
|
|
222
|
-
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
337
|
+
this.log.info(`${partOfCommittee ? 'Attesting to' : 'Validated'} checkpoint proposal for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
223
338
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
224
339
|
inCommittee: partOfCommittee,
|
|
225
340
|
fishermanMode: this.config.fishermanMode || false
|
|
226
341
|
});
|
|
227
342
|
this.metrics.incSuccessfulAttestations(inCommittee.length);
|
|
228
|
-
// Upload blobs to filestore after successful re-execution (fire-and-forget)
|
|
229
|
-
if (validationResult.reexecutionResult?.block && this.fileStoreBlobUploadClient) {
|
|
230
|
-
void Promise.resolve().then(async ()=>{
|
|
231
|
-
try {
|
|
232
|
-
const blobFields = validationResult.reexecutionResult.block.getCheckpointBlobFields();
|
|
233
|
-
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
234
|
-
await this.fileStoreBlobUploadClient.saveBlobs(blobs, true);
|
|
235
|
-
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore from re-execution`, proposalInfo);
|
|
236
|
-
} catch (err) {
|
|
237
|
-
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs from re-execution`, err);
|
|
238
|
-
}
|
|
239
|
-
});
|
|
240
|
-
}
|
|
241
|
-
// If the above function does not throw an error, then we can attest to the proposal
|
|
242
343
|
// Determine which validators should attest
|
|
243
344
|
let attestors;
|
|
244
345
|
if (partOfCommittee) {
|
|
@@ -255,13 +356,197 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
255
356
|
}
|
|
256
357
|
if (this.config.fishermanMode) {
|
|
257
358
|
// bail out early and don't save attestations to the pool in fisherman mode
|
|
258
|
-
this.log.info(`Creating attestations for
|
|
359
|
+
this.log.info(`Creating checkpoint attestations for slot ${slotNumber}`, {
|
|
259
360
|
...proposalInfo,
|
|
260
361
|
attestors: attestors.map((a)=>a.toString())
|
|
261
362
|
});
|
|
262
363
|
return undefined;
|
|
263
364
|
}
|
|
264
|
-
return this.
|
|
365
|
+
return await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
366
|
+
}
|
|
367
|
+
/**
|
|
368
|
+
* Checks if we should attest to a slot based on equivocation prevention rules.
|
|
369
|
+
* @returns true if we should attest, false if we should skip
|
|
370
|
+
*/ shouldAttestToSlot(slotNumber) {
|
|
371
|
+
// If attestToEquivocatedProposals is true, always allow
|
|
372
|
+
if (this.config.attestToEquivocatedProposals) {
|
|
373
|
+
return true;
|
|
374
|
+
}
|
|
375
|
+
// Check if incoming slot is strictly greater than last attested
|
|
376
|
+
if (this.lastAttestedProposal && slotNumber <= this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber) {
|
|
377
|
+
this.log.warn(`Refusing to process a proposal for slot ${slotNumber} given we already attested to a proposal for slot ${this.lastAttestedProposal.slotNumber}`);
|
|
378
|
+
return false;
|
|
379
|
+
}
|
|
380
|
+
return true;
|
|
381
|
+
}
|
|
382
|
+
async createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
383
|
+
// Equivocation check: must happen right before signing to minimize the race window
|
|
384
|
+
if (!this.shouldAttestToSlot(proposal.slotNumber)) {
|
|
385
|
+
return undefined;
|
|
386
|
+
}
|
|
387
|
+
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToCheckpointProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
388
|
+
// Track the proposal we attested to (to prevent equivocation)
|
|
389
|
+
this.lastAttestedProposal = proposal;
|
|
390
|
+
await this.p2pClient.addOwnCheckpointAttestations(attestations);
|
|
391
|
+
return attestations;
|
|
392
|
+
}
|
|
393
|
+
/**
|
|
394
|
+
* Validates a checkpoint proposal by building the full checkpoint and comparing it with the proposal.
|
|
395
|
+
* @returns Validation result with isValid flag and reason if invalid.
|
|
396
|
+
*/ async validateCheckpointProposal(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
397
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
398
|
+
const timeoutSeconds = 10; // TODO(palla/mbps): This should map to the timetable settings
|
|
399
|
+
// Wait for last block to sync by archive
|
|
400
|
+
let lastBlockHeader;
|
|
401
|
+
try {
|
|
402
|
+
lastBlockHeader = await retryUntil(async ()=>{
|
|
403
|
+
await this.blockSource.syncImmediate();
|
|
404
|
+
return this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
405
|
+
}, `waiting for block with archive ${proposal.archive.toString()} for slot ${slot}`, timeoutSeconds, 0.5);
|
|
406
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
407
|
+
if (err instanceof TimeoutError) {
|
|
408
|
+
this.log.warn(`Timed out waiting for block with archive matching checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
409
|
+
return {
|
|
410
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
411
|
+
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
412
|
+
};
|
|
413
|
+
}
|
|
414
|
+
this.log.error(`Error fetching last block for checkpoint proposal`, err, proposalInfo);
|
|
415
|
+
return {
|
|
416
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
417
|
+
reason: 'block_fetch_error'
|
|
418
|
+
};
|
|
419
|
+
}
|
|
420
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
421
|
+
this.log.warn(`Last block not found for checkpoint proposal`, proposalInfo);
|
|
422
|
+
return {
|
|
423
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
424
|
+
reason: 'last_block_not_found'
|
|
425
|
+
};
|
|
426
|
+
}
|
|
427
|
+
// Get all full blocks for the slot and checkpoint
|
|
428
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(slot);
|
|
429
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
430
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
431
|
+
return {
|
|
432
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
433
|
+
reason: 'no_blocks_for_slot'
|
|
434
|
+
};
|
|
435
|
+
}
|
|
436
|
+
this.log.debug(`Found ${blocks.length} blocks for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
437
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
438
|
+
blockNumbers: blocks.map((b)=>b.number)
|
|
439
|
+
});
|
|
440
|
+
// Get checkpoint constants from first block
|
|
441
|
+
const firstBlock = blocks[0];
|
|
442
|
+
const constants = this.extractCheckpointConstants(firstBlock);
|
|
443
|
+
const checkpointNumber = firstBlock.checkpointNumber;
|
|
444
|
+
// Get L1-to-L2 messages for this checkpoint
|
|
445
|
+
const l1ToL2Messages = await this.l1ToL2MessageSource.getL1ToL2Messages(checkpointNumber);
|
|
446
|
+
// Compute the previous checkpoint out hashes for the epoch.
|
|
447
|
+
// TODO: There can be a more efficient way to get the previous checkpoint out hashes without having to fetch the
|
|
448
|
+
// actual checkpoints and the blocks/txs in them.
|
|
449
|
+
const epoch = getEpochAtSlot(slot, this.epochCache.getL1Constants());
|
|
450
|
+
const previousCheckpoints = (await this.blockSource.getCheckpointsForEpoch(epoch)).filter((b)=>b.number < checkpointNumber).sort((a, b)=>a.number - b.number);
|
|
451
|
+
const previousCheckpointOutHashes = previousCheckpoints.map((c)=>c.getCheckpointOutHash());
|
|
452
|
+
// Fork world state at the block before the first block
|
|
453
|
+
const parentBlockNumber = BlockNumber(firstBlock.number - 1);
|
|
454
|
+
const fork = await this.worldState.fork(parentBlockNumber);
|
|
455
|
+
try {
|
|
456
|
+
// Create checkpoint builder with all existing blocks
|
|
457
|
+
const checkpointBuilder = await this.checkpointsBuilder.openCheckpoint(checkpointNumber, constants, l1ToL2Messages, previousCheckpointOutHashes, fork, blocks, this.log.getBindings());
|
|
458
|
+
// Complete the checkpoint to get computed values
|
|
459
|
+
const computedCheckpoint = await checkpointBuilder.completeCheckpoint();
|
|
460
|
+
// Compare checkpoint header with proposal
|
|
461
|
+
if (!computedCheckpoint.header.equals(proposal.checkpointHeader)) {
|
|
462
|
+
this.log.warn(`Checkpoint header mismatch`, {
|
|
463
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
464
|
+
computed: computedCheckpoint.header.toInspect(),
|
|
465
|
+
proposal: proposal.checkpointHeader.toInspect()
|
|
466
|
+
});
|
|
467
|
+
return {
|
|
468
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
469
|
+
reason: 'checkpoint_header_mismatch'
|
|
470
|
+
};
|
|
471
|
+
}
|
|
472
|
+
// Compare archive root with proposal
|
|
473
|
+
if (!computedCheckpoint.archive.root.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
474
|
+
this.log.warn(`Archive root mismatch`, {
|
|
475
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
476
|
+
computed: computedCheckpoint.archive.root.toString(),
|
|
477
|
+
proposal: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
478
|
+
});
|
|
479
|
+
return {
|
|
480
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
481
|
+
reason: 'archive_mismatch'
|
|
482
|
+
};
|
|
483
|
+
}
|
|
484
|
+
// Check that the accumulated epoch out hash matches the value in the proposal.
|
|
485
|
+
// The epoch out hash is the accumulated hash of all checkpoint out hashes in the epoch.
|
|
486
|
+
const checkpointOutHash = computedCheckpoint.getCheckpointOutHash();
|
|
487
|
+
const computedEpochOutHash = accumulateCheckpointOutHashes([
|
|
488
|
+
...previousCheckpointOutHashes,
|
|
489
|
+
checkpointOutHash
|
|
490
|
+
]);
|
|
491
|
+
const proposalEpochOutHash = proposal.checkpointHeader.epochOutHash;
|
|
492
|
+
if (!computedEpochOutHash.equals(proposalEpochOutHash)) {
|
|
493
|
+
this.log.warn(`Epoch out hash mismatch`, {
|
|
494
|
+
proposalEpochOutHash: proposalEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
495
|
+
computedEpochOutHash: computedEpochOutHash.toString(),
|
|
496
|
+
checkpointOutHash: checkpointOutHash.toString(),
|
|
497
|
+
previousCheckpointOutHashes: previousCheckpointOutHashes.map((h)=>h.toString()),
|
|
498
|
+
...proposalInfo
|
|
499
|
+
});
|
|
500
|
+
return {
|
|
501
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
502
|
+
reason: 'out_hash_mismatch'
|
|
503
|
+
};
|
|
504
|
+
}
|
|
505
|
+
this.log.verbose(`Checkpoint proposal validation successful for slot ${slot}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
506
|
+
return {
|
|
507
|
+
isValid: true
|
|
508
|
+
};
|
|
509
|
+
} finally{
|
|
510
|
+
await fork.close();
|
|
511
|
+
}
|
|
512
|
+
}
|
|
513
|
+
/**
|
|
514
|
+
* Extract checkpoint global variables from a block.
|
|
515
|
+
*/ extractCheckpointConstants(block) {
|
|
516
|
+
const gv = block.header.globalVariables;
|
|
517
|
+
return {
|
|
518
|
+
chainId: gv.chainId,
|
|
519
|
+
version: gv.version,
|
|
520
|
+
slotNumber: gv.slotNumber,
|
|
521
|
+
coinbase: gv.coinbase,
|
|
522
|
+
feeRecipient: gv.feeRecipient,
|
|
523
|
+
gasFees: gv.gasFees
|
|
524
|
+
};
|
|
525
|
+
}
|
|
526
|
+
/**
|
|
527
|
+
* Uploads blobs for a checkpoint to the filestore (fire and forget).
|
|
528
|
+
*/ async uploadBlobsForCheckpoint(proposal, proposalInfo) {
|
|
529
|
+
try {
|
|
530
|
+
const lastBlockHeader = await this.blockSource.getBlockHeaderByArchive(proposal.archive);
|
|
531
|
+
if (!lastBlockHeader) {
|
|
532
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to get last block header for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
533
|
+
return;
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
const blocks = await this.blockSource.getBlocksForSlot(proposal.slotNumber);
|
|
536
|
+
if (blocks.length === 0) {
|
|
537
|
+
this.log.warn(`No blocks found for blob upload`, proposalInfo);
|
|
538
|
+
return;
|
|
539
|
+
}
|
|
540
|
+
const blobFields = blocks.flatMap((b)=>b.toBlobFields());
|
|
541
|
+
const blobs = getBlobsPerL1Block(blobFields);
|
|
542
|
+
await this.blobClient.sendBlobsToFilestore(blobs);
|
|
543
|
+
this.log.debug(`Uploaded ${blobs.length} blobs to filestore for checkpoint at slot ${proposal.slotNumber}`, {
|
|
544
|
+
...proposalInfo,
|
|
545
|
+
numBlobs: blobs.length
|
|
546
|
+
});
|
|
547
|
+
} catch (err) {
|
|
548
|
+
this.log.warn(`Failed to upload blobs for checkpoint: ${err}`, proposalInfo);
|
|
549
|
+
}
|
|
265
550
|
}
|
|
266
551
|
slashInvalidBlock(proposal) {
|
|
267
552
|
const proposer = proposal.getSender();
|
|
@@ -285,50 +570,103 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
285
570
|
}
|
|
286
571
|
]);
|
|
287
572
|
}
|
|
288
|
-
|
|
289
|
-
|
|
290
|
-
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
292
|
-
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
|
|
573
|
+
/**
|
|
574
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate proposal (equivocation).
|
|
575
|
+
* Emits a slash event when a proposer sends multiple proposals for the same position.
|
|
576
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateProposal(info) {
|
|
577
|
+
const { slot, proposer, type } = info;
|
|
578
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate ${type} proposal from ${proposer.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
579
|
+
proposer: proposer.toString(),
|
|
580
|
+
slot,
|
|
581
|
+
type
|
|
582
|
+
});
|
|
583
|
+
// Emit slash event
|
|
584
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
585
|
+
{
|
|
586
|
+
validator: proposer,
|
|
587
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateProposalPenalty,
|
|
588
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_PROPOSAL,
|
|
589
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
590
|
+
}
|
|
591
|
+
]);
|
|
592
|
+
}
|
|
593
|
+
/**
|
|
594
|
+
* Handle detection of a duplicate attestation (equivocation).
|
|
595
|
+
* Emits a slash event when an attester signs attestations for different proposals at the same slot.
|
|
596
|
+
*/ handleDuplicateAttestation(info) {
|
|
597
|
+
const { slot, attester } = info;
|
|
598
|
+
this.log.warn(`Triggering slash event for duplicate attestation from ${attester.toString()} at slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
599
|
+
attester: attester.toString(),
|
|
600
|
+
slot
|
|
601
|
+
});
|
|
602
|
+
this.emit(WANT_TO_SLASH_EVENT, [
|
|
603
|
+
{
|
|
604
|
+
validator: attester,
|
|
605
|
+
amount: this.config.slashDuplicateAttestationPenalty,
|
|
606
|
+
offenseType: OffenseType.DUPLICATE_ATTESTATION,
|
|
607
|
+
epochOrSlot: BigInt(slot)
|
|
608
|
+
}
|
|
609
|
+
]);
|
|
610
|
+
}
|
|
611
|
+
async createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
612
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal position
|
|
613
|
+
if (this.lastProposedBlock) {
|
|
614
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedBlock.slotNumber;
|
|
615
|
+
const lastIndex = this.lastProposedBlock.indexWithinCheckpoint;
|
|
616
|
+
const newSlot = blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber;
|
|
617
|
+
if (newSlot < lastSlot || newSlot === lastSlot && indexWithinCheckpoint <= lastIndex) {
|
|
618
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create block proposal for slot ${newSlot} index ${indexWithinCheckpoint}: ` + `already proposed block for slot ${lastSlot} index ${lastIndex}`);
|
|
619
|
+
}
|
|
620
|
+
}
|
|
621
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling block proposal for block ${blockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber} slot ${blockHeader.globalVariables.slotNumber}`);
|
|
622
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createBlockProposal(blockHeader, indexWithinCheckpoint, inHash, archive, txs, proposerAddress, {
|
|
297
623
|
...options,
|
|
298
624
|
broadcastInvalidBlockProposal: this.config.broadcastInvalidBlockProposal
|
|
299
625
|
});
|
|
300
|
-
this.
|
|
626
|
+
this.lastProposedBlock = newProposal;
|
|
301
627
|
return newProposal;
|
|
302
628
|
}
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
|
|
305
|
-
this.
|
|
306
|
-
|
|
629
|
+
async createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options = {}) {
|
|
630
|
+
// Validate that we're not creating a proposal for an older or equal slot
|
|
631
|
+
if (this.lastProposedCheckpoint) {
|
|
632
|
+
const lastSlot = this.lastProposedCheckpoint.slotNumber;
|
|
633
|
+
const newSlot = checkpointHeader.slotNumber;
|
|
634
|
+
if (newSlot <= lastSlot) {
|
|
635
|
+
throw new Error(`Cannot create checkpoint proposal for slot ${newSlot}: ` + `already proposed checkpoint for slot ${lastSlot}`);
|
|
636
|
+
}
|
|
637
|
+
}
|
|
638
|
+
this.log.info(`Assembling checkpoint proposal for slot ${checkpointHeader.slotNumber}`);
|
|
639
|
+
const newProposal = await this.validationService.createCheckpointProposal(checkpointHeader, archive, lastBlockInfo, proposerAddress, options);
|
|
640
|
+
this.lastProposedCheckpoint = newProposal;
|
|
641
|
+
return newProposal;
|
|
307
642
|
}
|
|
308
643
|
async broadcastBlockProposal(proposal) {
|
|
309
644
|
await this.p2pClient.broadcastProposal(proposal);
|
|
310
645
|
}
|
|
311
|
-
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer) {
|
|
312
|
-
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer);
|
|
646
|
+
async signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, blockNumber) {
|
|
647
|
+
return await this.validationService.signAttestationsAndSigners(attestationsAndSigners, proposer, slot, blockNumber);
|
|
313
648
|
}
|
|
314
649
|
async collectOwnAttestations(proposal) {
|
|
315
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
650
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
316
651
|
const inCommittee = await this.epochCache.filterInCommittee(slot, this.getValidatorAddresses());
|
|
317
652
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${inCommittee.length} self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, {
|
|
318
653
|
inCommittee
|
|
319
654
|
});
|
|
320
|
-
const attestations = await this.
|
|
655
|
+
const attestations = await this.createCheckpointAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, inCommittee);
|
|
656
|
+
if (!attestations) {
|
|
657
|
+
return [];
|
|
658
|
+
}
|
|
321
659
|
// We broadcast our own attestations to our peers so, in case our block does not get mined on L1,
|
|
322
660
|
// other nodes can see that our validators did attest to this block proposal, and do not slash us
|
|
323
661
|
// due to inactivity for missed attestations.
|
|
324
|
-
void this.p2pClient.
|
|
662
|
+
void this.p2pClient.broadcastCheckpointAttestations(attestations).catch((err)=>{
|
|
325
663
|
this.log.error(`Failed to broadcast self-attestations for slot ${slot}`, err);
|
|
326
664
|
});
|
|
327
665
|
return attestations;
|
|
328
666
|
}
|
|
329
667
|
async collectAttestations(proposal, required, deadline) {
|
|
330
|
-
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this
|
|
331
|
-
const slot = proposal.
|
|
668
|
+
// Wait and poll the p2pClient's attestation pool for this checkpoint until we have enough attestations
|
|
669
|
+
const slot = proposal.slotNumber;
|
|
332
670
|
this.log.debug(`Collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} with deadline ${deadline.toISOString()}`);
|
|
333
671
|
if (+deadline < this.dateProvider.now()) {
|
|
334
672
|
this.log.error(`Deadline ${deadline.toISOString()} for collecting ${required} attestations for slot ${slot} is in the past`);
|
|
@@ -339,13 +677,13 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
339
677
|
const myAddresses = this.getValidatorAddresses();
|
|
340
678
|
let attestations = [];
|
|
341
679
|
while(true){
|
|
342
|
-
// Filter out attestations with a mismatching
|
|
680
|
+
// Filter out attestations with a mismatching archive. This should NOT happen since we have verified
|
|
343
681
|
// the proposer signature (ie our own) before accepting the attestation into the pool via the p2p client.
|
|
344
|
-
const collectedAttestations = (await this.p2pClient.
|
|
345
|
-
if (!attestation.
|
|
346
|
-
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched
|
|
347
|
-
|
|
348
|
-
|
|
682
|
+
const collectedAttestations = (await this.p2pClient.getCheckpointAttestationsForSlot(slot, proposalId)).filter((attestation)=>{
|
|
683
|
+
if (!attestation.archive.equals(proposal.archive)) {
|
|
684
|
+
this.log.warn(`Received attestation for slot ${slot} with mismatched archive from ${attestation.getSender()?.toString()}`, {
|
|
685
|
+
attestationArchive: attestation.archive.toString(),
|
|
686
|
+
proposalArchive: proposal.archive.toString()
|
|
349
687
|
});
|
|
350
688
|
return false;
|
|
351
689
|
}
|
|
@@ -377,11 +715,6 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
377
715
|
await sleep(this.config.attestationPollingIntervalMs);
|
|
378
716
|
}
|
|
379
717
|
}
|
|
380
|
-
async createBlockAttestationsFromProposal(proposal, attestors = []) {
|
|
381
|
-
const attestations = await this.validationService.attestToProposal(proposal, attestors);
|
|
382
|
-
await this.p2pClient.addAttestations(attestations);
|
|
383
|
-
return attestations;
|
|
384
|
-
}
|
|
385
718
|
async handleAuthRequest(peer, msg) {
|
|
386
719
|
const authRequest = AuthRequest.fromBuffer(msg);
|
|
387
720
|
const statusMessage = await this.p2pClient.handleAuthRequestFromPeer(authRequest, peer).catch((_)=>undefined);
|
|
@@ -396,7 +729,11 @@ const SLASHABLE_BLOCK_PROPOSAL_VALIDATION_RESULT = [
|
|
|
396
729
|
return Buffer.alloc(0);
|
|
397
730
|
}
|
|
398
731
|
const payloadToSign = authRequest.getPayloadToSign();
|
|
399
|
-
|
|
732
|
+
// AUTH_REQUEST doesn't require HA protection - multiple signatures are safe
|
|
733
|
+
const context = {
|
|
734
|
+
dutyType: DutyType.AUTH_REQUEST
|
|
735
|
+
};
|
|
736
|
+
const signature = await this.keyStore.signMessageWithAddress(addressToUse, payloadToSign, context);
|
|
400
737
|
const authResponse = new AuthResponse(statusMessage, signature);
|
|
401
738
|
return authResponse.toBuffer();
|
|
402
739
|
}
|