@aztec/pxe 0.0.1-commit.d1cd2107c → 0.0.1-commit.d1da697d6

package/src/logs/log_service.ts

@@ -12,11 +12,10 @@ import {
 } from '@aztec/stdlib/logs';
 import type { BlockHeader } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
 
-import type { AccessScopes } from '../access_scopes.js';
 import type { LogRetrievalRequest } from '../contract_function_simulator/noir-structs/log_retrieval_request.js';
 import { LogRetrievalResponse } from '../contract_function_simulator/noir-structs/log_retrieval_response.js';
 import { AddressStore } from '../storage/address_store/address_store.js';
-import { CapsuleStore } from '../storage/capsule_store/capsule_store.js';
+import type { CapsuleService } from '../storage/capsule_store/capsule_service.js';
 import type { RecipientTaggingStore } from '../storage/tagging_store/recipient_tagging_store.js';
 import type { SenderAddressBookStore } from '../storage/tagging_store/sender_address_book_store.js';
 import {
@@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ export class LogService {
     private readonly aztecNode: AztecNode,
     private readonly anchorBlockHeader: BlockHeader,
     private readonly keyStore: KeyStore,
-    private readonly capsuleStore: CapsuleStore,
+    private readonly capsuleService: CapsuleService,
     private readonly recipientTaggingStore: RecipientTaggingStore,
     private readonly senderAddressBookStore: SenderAddressBookStore,
     private readonly addressStore: AddressStore,
@@ -42,7 +41,16 @@ export class LogService {
     this.log = createLogger('pxe:log_service', bindings);
   }
 
-  public async bulkRetrieveLogs(logRetrievalRequests: LogRetrievalRequest[]): Promise<(LogRetrievalResponse | null)[]> {
+  public async fetchLogsByTag(
+    contractAddress: AztecAddress,
+    logRetrievalRequests: LogRetrievalRequest[],
+  ): Promise<(LogRetrievalResponse | null)[]> {
+    for (const request of logRetrievalRequests) {
+      if (!contractAddress.equals(request.contractAddress)) {
+        throw new Error(`Got a log retrieval request from ${request.contractAddress}, expected ${contractAddress}`);
+      }
+    }
+
     return await Promise.all(
       logRetrievalRequests.map(async request => {
         const [publicLog, privateLog] = await Promise.all([
@@ -51,8 +59,8 @@ export class LogService {
         ]);
 
         if (publicLog !== null && privateLog !== null) {
-          throw new Error(
-            `Found both a public and private log when searching for tag ${request.tag} from contract ${request.contractAddress}`,
+          this.log.warn(
+            `Found both a public and private log for tag ${request.tag} from contract ${request.contractAddress}. This may indicate a contract bug. Returning the public log.`,
           );
         }
 
@@ -74,9 +82,8 @@ export class LogService {
     if (logsForTag.length === 0) {
       return null;
     } else if (logsForTag.length > 1) {
-      // TODO(#11627): handle this case
-      throw new Error(
-        `Got ${logsForTag.length} logs for tag ${tag} and contract ${contractAddress.toString()}. getPublicLogByTag currently only supports a single log per tag`,
+      this.log.warn(
+        `Expected at most 1 public log for tag ${tag} and contract ${contractAddress.toString()}, got ${logsForTag.length}. This may indicate a contract bug. Returning the first log.`,
       );
     }
 
@@ -98,9 +105,8 @@ export class LogService {
     if (logsForTag.length === 0) {
       return null;
     } else if (logsForTag.length > 1) {
-      // TODO(#11627): handle this case
-      throw new Error(
-        `Got ${logsForTag.length} logs for tag ${siloedTag}. getPrivateLogByTag currently only supports a single log per tag`,
+      this.log.warn(
+        `Expected at most 1 private log for tag ${siloedTag}, got ${logsForTag.length}. This may indicate a contract bug. Returning the first log.`,
       );
     }
 
@@ -114,46 +120,40 @@ export class LogService {
     );
   }
 
-  public async fetchTaggedLogs(contractAddress: AztecAddress, pendingTaggedLogArrayBaseSlot: Fr, scopes: AccessScopes) {
+  public async fetchTaggedLogs(
+    contractAddress: AztecAddress,
+    pendingTaggedLogArrayBaseSlot: Fr,
+    recipient: AztecAddress,
+  ) {
     this.log.verbose(`Fetching tagged logs for ${contractAddress.toString()}`);
 
     // We only load logs from block up to and including the anchor block number
     const anchorBlockNumber = this.anchorBlockHeader.getBlockNumber();
     const anchorBlockHash = await this.anchorBlockHeader.hash();
 
-    // Determine recipients: use scopes if provided, otherwise get all accounts
-    const recipients = scopes !== 'ALL_SCOPES' && scopes.length > 0 ? scopes : await this.keyStore.getAccounts();
-
-    // For each recipient, fetch secrets, load logs, and store them.
-    // We run these per-recipient tasks in parallel so that logs are loaded for all recipients concurrently.
-    await Promise.all(
-      recipients.map(async recipient => {
-        // Get all secrets for this recipient (one per sender)
-        const secrets = await this.#getSecretsForSenders(contractAddress, recipient);
-
-        // Load logs for all sender-recipient pairs in parallel
-        const logArrays = await Promise.all(
-          secrets.map(secret =>
-            loadPrivateLogsForSenderRecipientPair(
-              secret,
-              this.aztecNode,
-              this.recipientTaggingStore,
-              anchorBlockNumber,
-              anchorBlockHash,
-              this.jobId,
-            ),
-          ),
-        );
+    // Get all secrets for this recipient (one per sender)
+    const secrets = await this.#getSecretsForSenders(contractAddress, recipient);
+
+    // Load logs for all sender-recipient pairs in parallel
+    const logArrays = await Promise.all(
+      secrets.map(secret =>
+        loadPrivateLogsForSenderRecipientPair(
+          secret,
+          this.aztecNode,
+          this.recipientTaggingStore,
+          anchorBlockNumber,
+          anchorBlockHash,
+          this.jobId,
+        ),
+      ),
+    );
 
-        // Flatten all logs from all secrets
-        const allLogs = logArrays.flat();
+    // Flatten all logs from all secrets
+    const allLogs = logArrays.flat();
 
-        // Store the logs for this recipient
-        if (allLogs.length > 0) {
-          await this.#storePendingTaggedLogs(contractAddress, pendingTaggedLogArrayBaseSlot, recipient, allLogs);
-        }
-      }),
-    );
+    if (allLogs.length > 0) {
+      await this.#storePendingTaggedLogs(contractAddress, pendingTaggedLogArrayBaseSlot, recipient, allLogs);
+    }
   }
 
   async #getSecretsForSenders(
@@ -176,14 +176,24 @@ export class LogService {
     );
 
     return Promise.all(
-      deduplicatedSenders.map(sender => {
-        return ExtendedDirectionalAppTaggingSecret.compute(
+      deduplicatedSenders.map(async sender => {
+        const secret = await ExtendedDirectionalAppTaggingSecret.compute(
           recipientCompleteAddress,
           recipientIvsk,
           sender,
           contractAddress,
           recipient,
         );
+
+        if (!secret) {
+          // Note that all senders originate from either the SenderAddressBookStore or the KeyStore.
+          // TODO(F-512): make sure we actually prevent registering invalid senders.
+          throw new Error(
+            `Failed to compute a tagging secret for sender ${sender} - this implies this is an invalid address, which should not happen as they have been previously registered in PXE.`,
+          );
+        }
+
+        return secret;
       }),
     );
   }
@@ -201,13 +211,18 @@ export class LogService {
         scopedLog.txHash,
         scopedLog.noteHashes,
         scopedLog.firstNullifier,
-        recipient,
       );
 
       return pendingTaggedLog.toFields();
     });
 
     // TODO: This looks like it could belong more at the oracle interface level
-    return this.capsuleStore.appendToCapsuleArray(contractAddress, capsuleArrayBaseSlot, pendingTaggedLogs, this.jobId);
+    return this.capsuleService.appendToCapsuleArray(
+      contractAddress,
+      capsuleArrayBaseSlot,
+      pendingTaggedLogs,
+      this.jobId,
+      recipient,
+    );
   }
 }

package/src/messages/message_context_service.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+import { Fr } from '@aztec/foundation/curves/bn254';
+import type { AztecNode } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
+import { MessageContext } from '@aztec/stdlib/logs';
+import { TxHash } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
+
+/** Resolves transaction hashes into the context needed to process messages. */
+export class MessageContextService {
+  constructor(private readonly aztecNode: AztecNode) {}
+
+  /**
+   * Resolves a list of tx hashes into their message contexts.
+   *
+   * For each tx hash, looks up the corresponding tx effect and extracts the note hashes and first nullifier needed to
+   * process messages that originated from that transaction. Returns `null` for tx hashes that are zero, not yet
+   * available, or in blocks beyond the anchor block.
+   */
+  getMessageContextsByTxHash(txHashes: Fr[], anchorBlockNumber: number): Promise<(MessageContext | null)[]> {
+    // TODO: optimize, we might be hitting the node to get the same txHash repeatedly
+    return Promise.all(
+      txHashes.map(async txHashField => {
+        // A zero tx hash indicates a tx-less offchain message (e.g. one not tied to any onchain transaction).
+        // These messages don't have a transaction context to resolve, so we return null.
+        if (txHashField.isZero()) {
+          return null;
+        }
+
+        const txHash = TxHash.fromField(txHashField);
+        const txEffect = await this.aztecNode.getTxEffect(txHash);
+        if (!txEffect || txEffect.l2BlockNumber > anchorBlockNumber) {
+          return null;
+        }
+
+        // Every tx has at least one nullifier (the first nullifier derived from the tx hash). Hitting this condition
+        // would mean a buggy node, but since we need to access data.nullifiers[0], the defensive check does no harm.
+        const data = txEffect.data;
+        if (data.nullifiers.length === 0) {
+          throw new Error(`Tx effect for ${txHash} has no nullifiers`);
+        }
+
+        return new MessageContext(data.txHash, data.noteHashes, data.nullifiers[0]);
+      }),
+    );
+  }
+}

package/src/notes/note_service.ts

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ import { Note, NoteDao, NoteStatus } from '@aztec/stdlib/note';
 import { MerkleTreeId } from '@aztec/stdlib/trees';
 import type { BlockHeader, TxHash } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
 
-import type { AccessScopes } from '../access_scopes.js';
 import type { NoteStore } from '../storage/note_store/note_store.js';
 
 export class NoteService {
@@ -32,7 +31,7 @@ export class NoteService {
     owner: AztecAddress | undefined,
     storageSlot: Fr,
     status: NoteStatus,
-    scopes: AccessScopes,
+    scopes: AztecAddress[],
   ) {
     const noteDaos = await this.noteStore.getNotes(
       {
@@ -71,7 +70,7 @@ export class NoteService {
    *
    * @param contractAddress - The contract whose notes should be checked and nullified.
    */
-  public async syncNoteNullifiers(contractAddress: AztecAddress, scopes: AccessScopes): Promise<void> {
+  public async syncNoteNullifiers(contractAddress: AztecAddress, scopes: AztecAddress[]): Promise<void> {
     const anchorBlockHash = await this.anchorBlockHeader.hash();
 
     const contractNotes = await this.noteStore.getNotes({ contractAddress, scopes }, this.jobId);
@@ -121,7 +120,7 @@ export class NoteService {
     noteHash: Fr,
     nullifier: Fr,
     txHash: TxHash,
-    recipient: AztecAddress,
+    scope: AztecAddress,
   ): Promise<void> {
     // We are going to store the new note in the NoteStore, which will let us later return it via `getNotes`.
     // There's two things we need to check before we do this however:
@@ -155,16 +154,28 @@ export class NoteService {
       this.aztecNode.findLeavesIndexes(anchorBlockHash, MerkleTreeId.NULLIFIER_TREE, [siloedNullifier]),
     ]);
     if (!txEffect) {
-      throw new Error(`Could not find tx effect for tx hash ${txHash}`);
+      // We error out instead of just logging a warning and skipping the note because this would indicate a bug. This
+      // is because the node has already served info about this tx either when obtaining the log (TxScopedL2Log contain
+      // tx info) or when getting metadata for the offchain message (before the message got passed to `process_log`).
+      throw new Error(`Could not find tx effect for tx hash ${txHash} when processing a note.`);
     }
 
     if (txEffect.l2BlockNumber > anchorBlockNumber) {
-      throw new Error(`Could not find tx effect for tx hash ${txHash} as of block number ${anchorBlockNumber}`);
+      // If the message was delivered onchain, this would indicate a bug: log sync should never load logs from blocks
+      // newer than the anchor block. If the note came via an offchain message, it would likely also be a bug, since we
+      // sync a new anchor block before calling `process_message`. For this not to be a bug, the message would need to
+      // come from a newer block than the anchor served by the node, implying the node isn't properly synced.
+      //     We therefore error out here rather than assuming the offchain message was constructed by a malicious
+      // sender with the intention of bricking recipient's PXE (if we assumed that we would just ignore the message).
+      throw new Error(
+        `Obtained a newer tx effect for ${txHash} for a note validation request than the anchor block ${anchorBlockNumber}. This is a bug as we should not ever be processing a note from a newer block than the anchor block.`,
+      );
     }
 
     // Find the index of the note hash in the noteHashes array to determine note ordering within the tx
     const noteIndexInTx = txEffect.data.noteHashes.findIndex(nh => nh.equals(uniqueNoteHash));
     if (noteIndexInTx === -1) {
+      // Similar to the comment above - we error out as this would indicate a bug in nonce discovery.
       throw new Error(`Note hash ${noteHash} (uniqued as ${uniqueNoteHash}) is not present in tx ${txHash}`);
     }
 
@@ -184,8 +195,7 @@ export class NoteService {
       noteIndexInTx,
     );
 
-    // The note was found by `recipient`, so we use that as the scope when storing the note.
-    await this.noteStore.addNotes([noteDao], recipient, this.jobId);
+    await this.noteStore.addNotes([noteDao], scope, this.jobId);
 
     if (nullifierIndex !== undefined) {
       // We found nullifier index which implies that the note has already been nullified.

package/src/notes_filter.ts

@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ import type { Fr } from '@aztec/foundation/curves/bn254';
 import type { AztecAddress } from '@aztec/stdlib/aztec-address';
 import type { NoteStatus } from '@aztec/stdlib/note';
 
-import type { AccessScopes } from './access_scopes.js';
-
 /**
  * A filter used to fetch notes.
  * @remarks This filter is applied as an intersection of all its params.
@@ -22,5 +20,5 @@ export type NotesFilter = {
   status?: NoteStatus;
   /** The siloed nullifier for the note. */
   siloedNullifier?: Fr;
-  scopes: AccessScopes;
+  scopes: AztecAddress[];
 };

package/src/oracle_version.ts

@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
 ///
 /// @dev Whenever a contract function or Noir test is run, the `aztec_utl_assertCompatibleOracleVersion` oracle is called
 /// and if the oracle version is incompatible an error is thrown.
-export const ORACLE_VERSION = 14;
+export const ORACLE_VERSION = 22;
 
 /// This hash is computed as by hashing the Oracle interface and it is used to detect when the Oracle interface changes,
 /// which in turn implies that you need to update the ORACLE_VERSION constant in this file and in
 /// `noir-projects/aztec-nr/aztec/src/oracle/version.nr`.
-export const ORACLE_INTERFACE_HASH = '9fb918682455c164ce8dd3acb71c751e2b9b2fc48913604069c9ea885fa378ca';
+export const ORACLE_INTERFACE_HASH = '83f1de1a9741a34916fd58cf12b857d0bac90f74bf00751b20304301a3f5c8eb';

package/src/pxe.ts

@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ import {
 
 import { inspect } from 'util';
 
-import type { AccessScopes } from './access_scopes.js';
 import { BlockSynchronizer } from './block_synchronizer/index.js';
 import type { PXEConfig } from './config/index.js';
 import { BenchmarkedNodeFactory } from './contract_function_simulator/benchmarked_node.js';
@@ -68,6 +67,7 @@ import { PXEDebugUtils } from './debug/pxe_debug_utils.js';
 import { enrichPublicSimulationError, enrichSimulationError } from './error_enriching.js';
 import { PrivateEventFilterValidator } from './events/private_event_filter_validator.js';
 import { JobCoordinator } from './job_coordinator/job_coordinator.js';
+import { MessageContextService } from './messages/message_context_service.js';
 import {
   PrivateKernelExecutionProver,
   type PrivateKernelExecutionProverConfig,
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ export type ProfileTxOpts = {
   /** If true, proof generation is skipped during profiling. Defaults to true. */
   skipProofGeneration?: boolean;
   /** Addresses whose private state and keys are accessible during private execution. */
-  scopes: AccessScopes;
+  scopes: AztecAddress[];
 };
 
 /** Options for PXE.simulateTx. */
@@ -106,10 +106,12 @@ export type SimulateTxOpts = {
   skipTxValidation?: boolean;
   /** If false, fees are enforced. */
   skipFeeEnforcement?: boolean;
-  /** State overrides for the simulation, such as contract instances and artifacts. */
+  /** If true, kernel logic is emulated in TS for simulation */
+  skipKernels?: boolean;
+  /** State overrides for the simulation, such as contract instances and artifacts. Requires skipKernels: true */
   overrides?: SimulationOverrides;
   /** Addresses whose private state and keys are accessible during private execution */
-  scopes: AccessScopes;
+  scopes: AztecAddress[];
 };
 
 /** Options for PXE.executeUtility. */
@@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ export type ExecuteUtilityOpts = {
   /** The authentication witnesses required for the function call. */
   authwits?: AuthWitness[];
   /** The accounts whose notes we can access in this call */
-  scopes: AccessScopes;
+  scopes: AztecAddress[];
 };
 
 /** Args for PXE.create. */
@@ -158,6 +160,7 @@ export class PXE {
     private addressStore: AddressStore,
     private privateEventStore: PrivateEventStore,
     private contractSyncService: ContractSyncService,
+    private messageContextService: MessageContextService,
     private simulator: CircuitSimulator,
     private proverEnabled: boolean,
     private proofCreator: PrivateKernelProver,
@@ -213,6 +216,8 @@ export class PXE {
       noteStore,
       createLogger('pxe:contract_sync', bindings),
     );
+    const messageContextService = new MessageContextService(node);
+
     const synchronizer = new BlockSynchronizer(
       node,
       store,
@@ -254,6 +259,7 @@ export class PXE {
       addressStore,
       privateEventStore,
       contractSyncService,
+      messageContextService,
       simulator,
       proverEnabled,
       proofCreator,
@@ -295,6 +301,7 @@ export class PXE {
       privateEventStore: this.privateEventStore,
       simulator: this.simulator,
       contractSyncService: this.contractSyncService,
+      messageContextService: this.messageContextService,
     });
   }
 
@@ -360,7 +367,7 @@ export class PXE {
   async #executePrivate(
     contractFunctionSimulator: ContractFunctionSimulator,
     txRequest: TxExecutionRequest,
-    scopes: AccessScopes,
+    scopes: AztecAddress[],
     jobId: string,
   ): Promise<PrivateExecutionResult> {
     const { origin: contractAddress, functionSelector } = txRequest;
@@ -409,12 +416,19 @@ export class PXE {
     contractFunctionSimulator: ContractFunctionSimulator,
     call: FunctionCall,
     authWitnesses: AuthWitness[] | undefined,
-    scopes: AccessScopes,
+    scopes: AztecAddress[],
     jobId: string,
   ) {
     try {
       const anchorBlockHeader = await this.anchorBlockStore.getBlockHeader();
-      return contractFunctionSimulator.runUtility(call, authWitnesses ?? [], anchorBlockHeader, scopes, jobId);
+      const { result, offchainEffects } = await contractFunctionSimulator.runUtility(
+        call,
+        authWitnesses ?? [],
+        anchorBlockHeader,
+        scopes,
+        jobId,
+      );
+      return { result, offchainEffects };
     } catch (err) {
       if (err instanceof SimulationError) {
         await enrichSimulationError(err, this.contractStore, this.log);
@@ -487,7 +501,9 @@ export class PXE {
    * @returns The synced block header
    */
   public getSyncedBlockHeader(): Promise<BlockHeader> {
-    return this.anchorBlockStore.getBlockHeader();
+    return this.#putInJobQueue(() => {
+      return this.anchorBlockStore.getBlockHeader();
+    });
   }
 
   /**
@@ -554,6 +570,9 @@ export class PXE {
 
     if (wasAdded) {
       this.log.info(`Added sender:\n ${sender.toString()}`);
+      // Wipe the entire sync cache: the new sender's tagged logs could contain notes/events for any contract, so
+      // all contracts must re-sync to discover them.
+      this.contractSyncService.wipe();
     } else {
       this.log.info(`Sender:\n "${sender.toString()}"\n already registered.`);
     }
@@ -766,17 +785,17 @@ export class PXE {
         // transaction before this one is included in a block from this PXE, and that transaction contains a log with
         // a tag derived from the same secret, we would reuse the tag and the transactions would be linked. Hence
         // storing the tags here prevents linkage of txs sent from the same PXE.
-        const preTagsUsedInTheTx = privateExecutionResult.entrypoint.preTags;
-        if (preTagsUsedInTheTx.length > 0) {
+        const taggingIndexRangesUsedInTheTx = privateExecutionResult.entrypoint.taggingIndexRanges;
+        if (taggingIndexRangesUsedInTheTx.length > 0) {
           // TODO(benesjan): The following is an expensive operation. Figure out a way to avoid it.
           const txHash = (await txProvingResult.toTx()).txHash;
 
-          await this.senderTaggingStore.storePendingIndexes(preTagsUsedInTheTx, txHash, jobId);
-          this.log.debug(`Stored used pre-tags as sender for the tx`, {
-            preTagsUsedInTheTx,
+          await this.senderTaggingStore.storePendingIndexes(taggingIndexRangesUsedInTheTx, txHash, jobId);
+          this.log.debug(`Stored used tagging index ranges as sender for the tx`, {
+            taggingIndexRangesUsedInTheTx,
           });
         } else {
-          this.log.debug(`No pre-tags used in the tx`);
+          this.log.debug(`No tagging index ranges used in the tx`);
         }
 
         return txProvingResult;
@@ -883,7 +902,14 @@ export class PXE {
    */
   public simulateTx(
     txRequest: TxExecutionRequest,
-    { simulatePublic, skipTxValidation = false, skipFeeEnforcement = false, overrides, scopes }: SimulateTxOpts,
+    {
+      simulatePublic,
+      skipTxValidation = false,
+      skipFeeEnforcement = false,
+      skipKernels = true,
+      overrides,
+      scopes,
+    }: SimulateTxOpts,
   ): Promise<TxSimulationResult> {
     // We disable concurrent simulations since those might execute oracles which read and write to the PXE stores (e.g.
     // to the capsules), and we need to prevent concurrent runs from interfering with one another (e.g. attempting to
@@ -907,17 +933,20 @@ export class PXE {
         await this.blockStateSynchronizer.sync();
         const syncTime = syncTimer.ms();
 
-        const contractFunctionSimulator = this.#getSimulatorForTx(overrides);
-        // Temporary: in case there are overrides, we have to skip the kernels or validations
-        // will fail. Consider handing control to the user/wallet on whether they want to run them
-        // or not.
         const overriddenContracts = overrides?.contracts ? new Set(Object.keys(overrides.contracts)) : undefined;
         const hasOverriddenContracts = overriddenContracts !== undefined && overriddenContracts.size > 0;
-        const skipKernels = hasOverriddenContracts;
 
-        // Set overridden contracts on the sync service so it knows to skip syncing them
+        if (hasOverriddenContracts && !skipKernels) {
+          throw new Error(
+            'Simulating with overridden contracts is not compatible with kernel execution. Please set skipKernels to true when simulating with overridden contracts.',
+          );
+        }
+        const contractFunctionSimulator = this.#getSimulatorForTx(overrides);
+
         if (hasOverriddenContracts) {
-          this.contractSyncService.setOverriddenContracts(jobId, overriddenContracts);
+          // Overridden contracts don't have a sync function, so calling sync on them would fail.
+          // We exclude them so the sync service skips them entirely.
+          this.contractSyncService.setExcludedFromSync(jobId, overriddenContracts);
         }
 
         // Execution of private functions only; no proving, and no kernel logic.
@@ -1012,7 +1041,7 @@ export class PXE {
           inspect(txRequest),
           `simulatePublic=${simulatePublic}`,
           `skipTxValidation=${skipTxValidation}`,
-          `scopes=${scopes === 'ALL_SCOPES' ? scopes : scopes.map(s => s.toString()).join(', ')}`,
+          `scopes=${scopes.map(s => s.toString()).join(', ')}`,
         );
       }
     });
@@ -1024,7 +1053,7 @@ export class PXE {
    */
   public executeUtility(
     call: FunctionCall,
-    { authwits, scopes }: ExecuteUtilityOpts = { scopes: 'ALL_SCOPES' },
+    { authwits, scopes }: ExecuteUtilityOpts = { scopes: [] },
   ): Promise<UtilityExecutionResult> {
     // We disable concurrent executions since those might execute oracles which read and write to the PXE stores (e.g.
     // to the capsules), and we need to prevent concurrent runs from interfering with one another (e.g. attempting to
@@ -1049,7 +1078,7 @@ export class PXE {
           scopes,
         );
 
-        const executionResult = await this.#executeUtility(
+        const { result: executionResult, offchainEffects } = await this.#executeUtility(
           contractFunctionSimulator,
           call,
           authwits ?? [],
@@ -1070,14 +1099,19 @@ export class PXE {
         };
 
         const simulationStats = contractFunctionSimulator.getStats();
-        return { result: executionResult, stats: { timings, nodeRPCCalls: simulationStats.nodeRPCCalls } };
+        return {
+          result: executionResult,
+          offchainEffects,
+          anchorBlockTimestamp: anchorBlockHeader.globalVariables.timestamp,
+          stats: { timings, nodeRPCCalls: simulationStats.nodeRPCCalls },
+        };
       } catch (err: any) {
         const { to, name, args } = call;
         const stringifiedArgs = args.map(arg => arg.toString()).join(', ');
         throw this.#contextualizeError(
           err,
           `executeUtility ${to}:${name}(${stringifiedArgs})`,
-          `scopes=${scopes === 'ALL_SCOPES' ? scopes : scopes.map(s => s.toString()).join(', ')}`,
+          `scopes=${scopes.map(s => s.toString()).join(', ')}`,
         );
       }
     });