@aztec/prover-node 0.0.1-commit.a5db02d → 0.0.1-commit.aa0c64f
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +95 -34
- package/dest/actions/rerun-epoch-proving-job.d.ts +11 -2
- package/dest/actions/rerun-epoch-proving-job.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/actions/rerun-epoch-proving-job.js +195 -55
- package/dest/checkpoint-store.d.ts +9 -2
- package/dest/checkpoint-store.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/checkpoint-store.js +9 -0
- package/dest/config.d.ts +3 -1
- package/dest/config.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/config.js +7 -0
- package/dest/factory.d.ts +4 -1
- package/dest/factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/factory.js +2 -1
- package/dest/job/checkpoint-prover.d.ts +34 -4
- package/dest/job/checkpoint-prover.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/job/checkpoint-prover.js +41 -8
- package/dest/job/epoch-session.d.ts +14 -2
- package/dest/job/epoch-session.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/job/epoch-session.js +24 -2
- package/dest/prover-node-publisher.d.ts +4 -1
- package/dest/prover-node-publisher.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/prover-node-publisher.js +5 -3
- package/dest/prover-node.d.ts +37 -8
- package/dest/prover-node.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/prover-node.js +82 -19
- package/dest/prover-publisher-factory.d.ts +3 -1
- package/dest/prover-publisher-factory.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/prover-publisher-factory.js +1 -0
- package/dest/session-manager.d.ts +16 -16
- package/dest/session-manager.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dest/session-manager.js +62 -62
- package/package.json +24 -23
- package/src/actions/rerun-epoch-proving-job.ts +139 -66
- package/src/checkpoint-store.ts +20 -2
- package/src/config.ts +10 -0
- package/src/factory.ts +5 -0
- package/src/job/checkpoint-prover.ts +61 -7
- package/src/job/epoch-session.ts +26 -2
- package/src/prover-node-publisher.ts +7 -3
- package/src/prover-node.ts +97 -20
- package/src/prover-publisher-factory.ts +3 -0
- package/src/session-manager.ts +70 -66
package/src/session-manager.ts
CHANGED
|
@@ -60,8 +60,9 @@ export type SessionManagerDeps = {
|
|
|
60
60
|
dateProvider: DateProvider;
|
|
61
61
|
config: SessionManagerConfig;
|
|
62
62
|
/**
|
|
63
|
-
*
|
|
64
|
-
*
|
|
63
|
+
* Fired once when a full session ends in its own genuine failure (`EpochSession.hasFailed()` — top-tree
|
|
64
|
+
* or submit failed with every prover healthy). The owner uploads a post-mortem here. Not fired for a
|
|
65
|
+
* `stopped` session (a prover under it failed — possibly a prune), which is recovered on re-add instead.
|
|
65
66
|
*/
|
|
66
67
|
onSessionFailed?: (session: EpochSession) => Promise<void>;
|
|
67
68
|
bindings?: LoggerBindings;
|
|
@@ -88,15 +89,6 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
88
89
|
private readonly reconcileQueue = new SerialQueue();
|
|
89
90
|
/** Cached L1 constants, populated on first read. */
|
|
90
91
|
private cachedL1Constants: L1RollupConstants | undefined;
|
|
91
|
-
/**
|
|
92
|
-
* Highest epoch for which the periodic tick has successfully created a full session.
|
|
93
|
-
* Monotonic high-water mark: once the tick observes a session for epoch X, it stops
|
|
94
|
-
* trying to open one — even if that session subsequently fails (only a new checkpoint
|
|
95
|
-
* event reopens it). Crucially, the mark only advances when a session actually exists
|
|
96
|
-
* post-open, so transient blockers (atMaxSessionLimit, archiver still indexing) leave
|
|
97
|
-
* the mark in place and the next tick retries.
|
|
98
|
-
*/
|
|
99
|
-
private lastTickEpoch: EpochNumber | undefined;
|
|
100
92
|
/** Test-only hooks applied to every session this manager constructs. */
|
|
101
93
|
private sessionHooks: EpochSessionHooks | undefined;
|
|
102
94
|
/** Periodic tick that nudges reconcile to pick up newly-complete epochs. Started by `start()`. */
|
|
@@ -248,17 +240,6 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
248
240
|
await this.openFullSessionIfReady(epoch);
|
|
249
241
|
}
|
|
250
242
|
|
|
251
|
-
// Advance the tick high-water mark only once a session actually exists for the epoch.
|
|
252
|
-
// `openFullSessionIfReady` can early-return without creating one (atMaxSessionLimit,
|
|
253
|
-
// archiver still indexing, etc.); in those cases we want the next tick to try again
|
|
254
|
-
// rather than skip the epoch forever.
|
|
255
|
-
if (trigger.kind === 'tick' && implicatedEpochs.length === 1) {
|
|
256
|
-
const epoch = implicatedEpochs[0];
|
|
257
|
-
if (this.fullSessions.has(epoch)) {
|
|
258
|
-
this.lastTickEpoch = epoch;
|
|
259
|
-
}
|
|
260
|
-
}
|
|
261
|
-
|
|
262
243
|
if (trigger.kind === 'start-proof') {
|
|
263
244
|
this.openPartialSession(trigger.spec);
|
|
264
245
|
}
|
|
@@ -266,15 +247,30 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
266
247
|
|
|
267
248
|
private recreateInvalidSessions(): void {
|
|
268
249
|
for (const [key, session] of Array.from(this.fullSessions.entries())) {
|
|
250
|
+
const canonical = this.checkpointsForSpec(session.getSpec());
|
|
251
|
+
const contentChanged = !this.checkpointsMatch(session.getCheckpoints(), canonical);
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
269
253
|
if (session.isTerminal()) {
|
|
254
|
+
// A full session that failed on its own account is retained as a "do not re-prove" marker while
|
|
255
|
+
// its content is unchanged — this is what stops the tick re-proving a deterministically-failing
|
|
256
|
+
// epoch. When the content changes (a re-add), it is replaced so the epoch retries over the new
|
|
257
|
+
// provers. Any other terminal full session is simply dropped.
|
|
258
|
+
if (session.hasFailed() && !contentChanged) {
|
|
259
|
+
continue;
|
|
260
|
+
}
|
|
270
261
|
this.fullSessions.delete(key);
|
|
262
|
+
if (contentChanged && this.canBuildOver(canonical)) {
|
|
263
|
+
const newSession = this.constructSession(session.getSpec(), canonical);
|
|
264
|
+
this.fullSessions.set(key, newSession);
|
|
265
|
+
void this.runSession(newSession);
|
|
266
|
+
}
|
|
271
267
|
continue;
|
|
272
268
|
}
|
|
273
|
-
|
|
274
|
-
if (
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
if (contentChanged) {
|
|
275
271
|
this.fireAndForgetCancel(session, 'canonical content changed');
|
|
276
272
|
this.fullSessions.delete(key);
|
|
277
|
-
if (canonical
|
|
273
|
+
if (this.canBuildOver(canonical)) {
|
|
278
274
|
const newSession = this.constructSession(session.getSpec(), canonical);
|
|
279
275
|
this.fullSessions.set(key, newSession);
|
|
280
276
|
void this.runSession(newSession);
|
|
@@ -290,7 +286,7 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
290
286
|
if (!this.checkpointsMatch(session.getCheckpoints(), canonical)) {
|
|
291
287
|
this.fireAndForgetCancel(session, 'canonical content changed');
|
|
292
288
|
this.partialSessions.delete(key);
|
|
293
|
-
if (canonical
|
|
289
|
+
if (this.canBuildOver(canonical)) {
|
|
294
290
|
const newSession = this.constructSession(session.getSpec(), canonical);
|
|
295
291
|
this.partialSessions.set(key, newSession);
|
|
296
292
|
void this.runSession(newSession);
|
|
@@ -299,9 +295,15 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
299
295
|
}
|
|
300
296
|
}
|
|
301
297
|
|
|
298
|
+
/** A session may be built over a checkpoint set only when it is non-empty and contains no failed prover. */
|
|
299
|
+
private canBuildOver(canonical: readonly CheckpointProver[]): boolean {
|
|
300
|
+
return canonical.length > 0 && !this.hasFailedProver(canonical);
|
|
301
|
+
}
|
|
302
|
+
|
|
302
303
|
private async openFullSessionIfReady(epoch: EpochNumber): Promise<void> {
|
|
303
|
-
//
|
|
304
|
-
//
|
|
304
|
+
// A session present here already covers the epoch: either live, or a retained genuinely-failed
|
|
305
|
+
// session kept by `recreateInvalidSessions` as a "do not re-prove" marker. Either way, don't open
|
|
306
|
+
// another — the retained-failed one is replaced only when its canonical content changes.
|
|
305
307
|
if (this.fullSessions.has(epoch)) {
|
|
306
308
|
return;
|
|
307
309
|
}
|
|
@@ -326,6 +328,13 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
326
328
|
});
|
|
327
329
|
return;
|
|
328
330
|
}
|
|
331
|
+
if (this.hasFailedProver(canonical)) {
|
|
332
|
+
// A checkpoint prover in the set has failed (a sub-tree fault or a prune-induced fork fault), so a
|
|
333
|
+
// session over it would fail immediately. Don't re-create it every tick — it recovers when a
|
|
334
|
+
// prune/re-add replaces the failed prover with a fresh one, or fails for good at expiry.
|
|
335
|
+
this.log.debug(`Skipping full-session open for epoch ${epoch}: a checkpoint prover has failed`, { epoch });
|
|
336
|
+
return;
|
|
337
|
+
}
|
|
329
338
|
const spec: SessionSpec = { kind: 'full', epochNumber: epoch, fromSlot, toSlot };
|
|
330
339
|
const session = this.constructSession(spec, canonical);
|
|
331
340
|
this.fullSessions.set(epoch, session);
|
|
@@ -334,7 +343,7 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
334
343
|
|
|
335
344
|
private openPartialSession(spec: SessionSpec): void {
|
|
336
345
|
const canonical = this.deps.checkpointStore.listInSlotRange(spec.fromSlot, spec.toSlot);
|
|
337
|
-
if (canonical.length === 0) {
|
|
346
|
+
if (canonical.length === 0 || this.hasFailedProver(canonical)) {
|
|
338
347
|
return;
|
|
339
348
|
}
|
|
340
349
|
// Reuse a live partial session for this epoch whose checkpoint set already matches the
|
|
@@ -406,33 +415,30 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
406
415
|
}
|
|
407
416
|
const state = await session.start();
|
|
408
417
|
this.log.info(`Session ${session.getId()} exited with state ${state}`);
|
|
409
|
-
|
|
410
|
-
|
|
411
|
-
|
|
412
|
-
|
|
413
|
-
|
|
414
|
-
|
|
415
|
-
|
|
416
|
-
this.log.info(`Skipping failure upload for session ${session.getId()}: canonical content changed`, {
|
|
417
|
-
...session.getSpec(),
|
|
418
|
-
});
|
|
419
|
-
return;
|
|
420
|
-
}
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
// A full session that failed on its own account (top-tree/submit failed with every prover healthy)
|
|
420
|
+
// is a genuine, race-free failure: upload its post-mortem once. `recreateInvalidSessions` retains
|
|
421
|
+
// the terminal session so this fires exactly once (it is never re-run over the same content). A
|
|
422
|
+
// `stopped` session (a prover under it failed) is not uploaded — it may be a prune, and recovers on
|
|
423
|
+
// re-add.
|
|
424
|
+
if (session.getKind() === 'full' && session.hasFailed() && this.deps.onSessionFailed) {
|
|
421
425
|
try {
|
|
422
426
|
await this.deps.onSessionFailed(session);
|
|
423
427
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
424
|
-
this.log.error(`Error in onSessionFailed callback for ${session.
|
|
428
|
+
this.log.error(`Error in onSessionFailed callback for epoch ${session.getEpochNumber()}`, err);
|
|
425
429
|
}
|
|
426
430
|
}
|
|
427
431
|
}
|
|
428
432
|
|
|
429
433
|
/**
|
|
430
|
-
* Builds the EpochProvingJobData snapshot for failure upload
|
|
431
|
-
*
|
|
432
|
-
* partial state is still useful for post-mortem analysis.
|
|
434
|
+
* Builds the EpochProvingJobData snapshot for a post-mortem failure upload from a set of
|
|
435
|
+
* checkpoint provers. Includes every checkpoint regardless of whether sub-tree proving
|
|
436
|
+
* completed — partial state is still useful for post-mortem analysis.
|
|
433
437
|
*/
|
|
434
|
-
public static
|
|
435
|
-
|
|
438
|
+
public static buildProvingData(checkpoints: readonly CheckpointProver[]): EpochProvingJobData {
|
|
439
|
+
if (checkpoints.length === 0) {
|
|
440
|
+
throw new Error('Cannot build proving data from an empty checkpoint set');
|
|
441
|
+
}
|
|
436
442
|
const txs = new Map();
|
|
437
443
|
const l1ToL2Messages: Record<number, Fr[]> = {};
|
|
438
444
|
for (const c of checkpoints) {
|
|
@@ -442,7 +448,7 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
442
448
|
l1ToL2Messages[c.checkpoint.number] = c.l1ToL2Messages;
|
|
443
449
|
}
|
|
444
450
|
return {
|
|
445
|
-
epochNumber:
|
|
451
|
+
epochNumber: checkpoints[0].epochNumber,
|
|
446
452
|
checkpoints: checkpoints.map(c => c.checkpoint),
|
|
447
453
|
txs,
|
|
448
454
|
l1ToL2Messages,
|
|
@@ -465,20 +471,12 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
465
471
|
/**
|
|
466
472
|
* Maps a reconcile trigger to the epochs whose full session should be (re)opened.
|
|
467
473
|
*
|
|
468
|
-
*
|
|
469
|
-
*
|
|
470
|
-
*
|
|
471
|
-
*
|
|
472
|
-
*
|
|
473
|
-
*
|
|
474
|
-
* - `checkpoint` and `prune` are deliberately NOT gated. They only fire when the epoch's canonical
|
|
475
|
-
* content actually changes — a checkpoint arrives, or a reorg prunes/replaces one — which is
|
|
476
|
-
* exactly when re-attempting is correct.
|
|
477
|
-
*
|
|
478
|
-
* A genuine proving failure produces no content change, hence no checkpoint/prune event, so only
|
|
479
|
-
* the gated tick could reopen it — and it won't. A prune + re-add fires ungated events, so the
|
|
480
|
-
* epoch is reopened through this path (and `openFullSessionIfReady` rebuilds over the fresh
|
|
481
|
-
* provers). See the "onTick does not retry ... but recovers ... re-added" test.
|
|
474
|
+
* The periodic `tick` returns the next unproven epoch every time; it does not track prior attempts.
|
|
475
|
+
* `openFullSessionIfReady` is what keeps this from re-proving a doomed epoch: it refuses to build a
|
|
476
|
+
* session when any checkpoint prover in the set has failed, so a stuck epoch is cheaply skipped each
|
|
477
|
+
* tick rather than re-proved. `checkpoint` and `prune` fire when an epoch's canonical content changes
|
|
478
|
+
* (a checkpoint arrives, or a reorg prunes/replaces one) — which is what installs a fresh prover in
|
|
479
|
+
* place of a failed one, letting the next open succeed and recovering a pruned-then-re-added epoch.
|
|
482
480
|
*/
|
|
483
481
|
private async epochsForTrigger(trigger: ReconcileTrigger): Promise<EpochNumber[]> {
|
|
484
482
|
switch (trigger.kind) {
|
|
@@ -488,10 +486,7 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
488
486
|
return trigger.affectedEpochs;
|
|
489
487
|
case 'tick': {
|
|
490
488
|
const epoch = await this.nextUnprovenEpoch();
|
|
491
|
-
|
|
492
|
-
return [];
|
|
493
|
-
}
|
|
494
|
-
return [epoch];
|
|
489
|
+
return epoch === undefined ? [] : [epoch];
|
|
495
490
|
}
|
|
496
491
|
case 'start-proof':
|
|
497
492
|
return [];
|
|
@@ -518,6 +513,15 @@ export class SessionManager {
|
|
|
518
513
|
return this.deps.checkpointStore.listInSlotRange(spec.fromSlot, spec.toSlot);
|
|
519
514
|
}
|
|
520
515
|
|
|
516
|
+
/**
|
|
517
|
+
* True if any prover in the set has failed. The epoch cannot be proven over a failed prover (it can
|
|
518
|
+
* never produce its block proofs), so a session must not be built or rebuilt over it until a prune/re-add
|
|
519
|
+
* has replaced it with a fresh prover.
|
|
520
|
+
*/
|
|
521
|
+
private hasFailedProver(checkpoints: readonly CheckpointProver[]): boolean {
|
|
522
|
+
return checkpoints.some(c => c.isFailed());
|
|
523
|
+
}
|
|
524
|
+
|
|
521
525
|
private fireAndForgetCancel(session: EpochSession, reason: string): void {
|
|
522
526
|
void session.cancel(reason).catch(err => this.log.warn(`Error cancelling session ${session.getId()}`, err));
|
|
523
527
|
}
|