@aztec/p2p 0.0.1-commit.ee80a48 → 0.0.1-commit.f103f88

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/gas_validator.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-import { AVM_MAX_PROCESSABLE_L2_GAS, FIXED_DA_GAS, FIXED_L2_GAS } from '@aztec/constants';
+import {
+  MAX_PROCESSABLE_DA_GAS_PER_CHECKPOINT,
+  MAX_PROCESSABLE_L2_GAS,
+  PRIVATE_TX_L2_GAS_OVERHEAD,
+  PUBLIC_TX_L2_GAS_OVERHEAD,
+  TX_DA_GAS_OVERHEAD,
+} from '@aztec/constants';
 import { type Logger, type LoggerBindings, createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
 import { computeFeePayerBalanceStorageSlot } from '@aztec/protocol-contracts/fee-juice';
 import type { AztecAddress } from '@aztec/stdlib/aztec-address';
@@ -16,42 +22,166 @@ import {
 
 import { getFeePayerClaimAmount, getTxFeeLimit } from './fee_payer_balance.js';
 
+/** Structural interface for types that carry gas limit data, used by {@link GasLimitsValidator}. */
+export interface HasGasLimitData {
+  txHash: { toString(): string };
+  data: {
+    // We just need to know whether there is something here or not
+    forPublic?: unknown;
+    constants: {
+      txContext: {
+        gasSettings: { gasLimits: Gas };
+      };
+    };
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Validates that a transaction's gas limits are within acceptable bounds.
+ *
+ * Rejects transactions whose gas limits fall below the fixed minimums (FIXED_DA_GAS,
+ * FIXED_L2_GAS) or exceed the AVM's maximum processable L2 gas. This is a cheap,
+ * stateless check that operates on gas settings alone.
+ *
+ * Generic over T so it can validate both full {@link Tx} objects and {@link TxMetaData}
+ * (used during pending pool migration).
+ *
+ * Used by: pending pool migration (via factory), and indirectly by {@link GasTxValidator}.
+ */
+export class GasLimitsValidator<T extends HasGasLimitData> implements TxValidator<T> {
+  #log: Logger;
+  #effectiveMaxL2Gas: number;
+  #effectiveMaxDAGas: number;
+  #rollupManaLimit: number;
+  #maxBlockL2Gas: number;
+  #maxBlockDAGas: number;
+
+  constructor(opts?: {
+    rollupManaLimit?: number;
+    maxBlockL2Gas?: number;
+    maxBlockDAGas?: number;
+    bindings?: LoggerBindings;
+  }) {
+    this.#log = createLogger('sequencer:tx_validator:tx_gas', opts?.bindings);
+    this.#rollupManaLimit = opts?.rollupManaLimit ?? Infinity;
+    this.#maxBlockL2Gas = opts?.maxBlockL2Gas ?? Infinity;
+    this.#maxBlockDAGas = opts?.maxBlockDAGas ?? Infinity;
+    this.#effectiveMaxL2Gas = Math.min(MAX_PROCESSABLE_L2_GAS, this.#rollupManaLimit, this.#maxBlockL2Gas);
+    this.#effectiveMaxDAGas = Math.min(MAX_PROCESSABLE_DA_GAS_PER_CHECKPOINT, this.#maxBlockDAGas);
+  }
+
+  validateTx(tx: T): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
+    return Promise.resolve(this.validateGasLimit(tx));
+  }
+
+  /** Checks gas limits are >= fixed minimums and <= effective max gas (L2 and DA). */
+  validateGasLimit(tx: T): TxValidationResult {
+    const gasLimits = tx.data.constants.txContext.gasSettings.gasLimits;
+    const minGasLimits = new Gas(
+      TX_DA_GAS_OVERHEAD,
+      tx.data.forPublic ? PUBLIC_TX_L2_GAS_OVERHEAD : PRIVATE_TX_L2_GAS_OVERHEAD,
+    );
+
+    if (minGasLimits.gtAny(gasLimits)) {
+      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting transaction due to the gas limit(s) not being above the minimum gas limit`, {
+        gasLimits,
+        minGasLimits,
+      });
+      return {
+        result: 'invalid',
+        reason: [
+          `${TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_GAS_LIMIT} (required=da:${minGasLimits.daGas},l2:${minGasLimits.l2Gas} got=da:${gasLimits.daGas},l2:${gasLimits.l2Gas})`,
+        ],
+      };
+    }
+
+    if (gasLimits.l2Gas > this.#effectiveMaxL2Gas) {
+      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting transaction due to the L2 gas limit being higher than the effective maximum`, {
+        gasLimits,
+        effectiveMaxL2Gas: this.#effectiveMaxL2Gas,
+        rollupManaLimit: this.#rollupManaLimit,
+        maxBlockL2Gas: this.#maxBlockL2Gas,
+      });
+      return {
+        result: 'invalid',
+        reason: [`${TX_ERROR_GAS_LIMIT_TOO_HIGH} (l2Gas=${gasLimits.l2Gas}, max=${this.#effectiveMaxL2Gas})`],
+      };
+    }
+
+    if (gasLimits.daGas > this.#effectiveMaxDAGas) {
+      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting transaction due to the DA gas limit being higher than the effective maximum`, {
+        gasLimits,
+        effectiveMaxDAGas: this.#effectiveMaxDAGas,
+        maxBlockDAGas: this.#maxBlockDAGas,
+      });
+      return {
+        result: 'invalid',
+        reason: [`${TX_ERROR_GAS_LIMIT_TOO_HIGH} (daGas=${gasLimits.daGas}, max=${this.#effectiveMaxDAGas})`],
+      };
+    }
+
+    return { result: 'valid' };
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Validates that a transaction can pay its gas fees.
+ *
+ * Runs three checks in order:
+ * 1. **Gas limits** (delegates to {@link GasLimitsValidator}) — rejects if limits are
+ *    out of bounds.
+ * 2. **Max fee per gas** — skips (not rejects) the tx if its maxFeesPerGas is below
+ *    the current block's gas fees. We skip rather than reject because the tx may
+ *    become eligible in a later block with lower fees.
+ * 3. **Fee payer balance** — reads the fee payer's FeeJuice balance from public state,
+ *    adds any pending claim from a setup-phase `_increase_public_balance` call, and
+ *    rejects if the total is less than the tx's fee limit (gasLimits * maxFeePerGas).
+ *
+ * Used by: gossip (stage 1), RPC, and block building validators.
+ */
 export class GasTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
   #log: Logger;
   #publicDataSource: PublicStateSource;
   #feeJuiceAddress: AztecAddress;
   #gasFees: GasFees;
+  #gasLimitOpts?: { rollupManaLimit?: number; maxBlockL2Gas?: number; maxBlockDAGas?: number };
 
   constructor(
     publicDataSource: PublicStateSource,
     feeJuiceAddress: AztecAddress,
     gasFees: GasFees,
-    bindings?: LoggerBindings,
+    private bindings?: LoggerBindings,
+    opts?: { rollupManaLimit?: number; maxBlockL2Gas?: number; maxBlockDAGas?: number },
   ) {
     this.#log = createLogger('sequencer:tx_validator:tx_gas', bindings);
     this.#publicDataSource = publicDataSource;
     this.#feeJuiceAddress = feeJuiceAddress;
     this.#gasFees = gasFees;
+    this.#gasLimitOpts = opts;
   }
 
   async validateTx(tx: Tx): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
-    const gasLimitValidation = this.#validateGasLimit(tx);
+    const gasLimitValidation = new GasLimitsValidator({
+      ...this.#gasLimitOpts,
+      bindings: this.bindings,
+    }).validateGasLimit(tx);
     if (gasLimitValidation.result === 'invalid') {
       return Promise.resolve(gasLimitValidation);
     }
-    if (this.#shouldSkip(tx)) {
-      return Promise.resolve({ result: 'skipped', reason: [TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_FEE_PER_GAS] });
+    const skipReason = this.#getSkipReason(tx);
+    if (skipReason) {
+      return Promise.resolve({ result: 'skipped', reason: [skipReason] });
     }
     return await this.validateTxFee(tx);
   }
 
   /**
-   * Check whether the tx's max fees are valid for the current block, and skip if not.
+   * Check whether the tx's max fees are valid for the current block, and return a skip reason if not.
    * We skip instead of invalidating since the tx may become eligible later.
    * Note that circuits check max fees even if fee payer is unset, so we
    * keep this validation even if the tx does not pay fees.
    */
-  #shouldSkip(tx: Tx): boolean {
+  #getSkipReason(tx: Tx): string | undefined {
     const gasSettings = tx.data.constants.txContext.gasSettings;
 
     // Skip the tx if its max fees are not enough for the current block's gas fees.
@@ -64,36 +194,15 @@ export class GasTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
         txMaxFeesPerGas: maxFeesPerGas.toInspect(),
         currentGasFees: this.#gasFees.toInspect(),
       });
+      return `${TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_FEE_PER_GAS} (maxFee=da:${maxFeesPerGas.feePerDaGas},l2:${maxFeesPerGas.feePerL2Gas} required=da:${this.#gasFees.feePerDaGas},l2:${this.#gasFees.feePerL2Gas})`;
     }
-    return notEnoughMaxFees;
+    return undefined;
   }
 
   /**
-   * Check whether the tx's gas limit is above the minimum amount.
+   * Checks the fee payer has enough FeeJuice balance to cover the tx's fee limit.
+   * Accounts for any pending claim from a setup-phase `_increase_public_balance` call.
    */
-  #validateGasLimit(tx: Tx): TxValidationResult {
-    const gasLimits = tx.data.constants.txContext.gasSettings.gasLimits;
-    const minGasLimits = new Gas(FIXED_DA_GAS, FIXED_L2_GAS);
-
-    if (minGasLimits.gtAny(gasLimits)) {
-      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting transaction due to the gas limit(s) not being above the minimum gas limit`, {
-        gasLimits,
-        minGasLimits,
-      });
-      return { result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_GAS_LIMIT] };
-    }
-
-    if (gasLimits.l2Gas > AVM_MAX_PROCESSABLE_L2_GAS) {
-      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting transaction due to the gas limit(s) being higher than the maximum processable gas`, {
-        gasLimits,
-        minGasLimits,
-      });
-      return { result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_GAS_LIMIT_TOO_HIGH] };
-    }
-
-    return { result: 'valid' };
-  }
-
   public async validateTxFee(tx: Tx): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
     const feePayer = tx.data.feePayer;
 
@@ -116,7 +225,10 @@ export class GasTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
         balance,
         feeLimit,
       });
-      return { result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_FEE_PAYER_BALANCE] };
+      return {
+        result: 'invalid',
+        reason: [`${TX_ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_FEE_PAYER_BALANCE} (required=${feeLimit}, available=${balance})`],
+      };
     }
     return { result: 'valid' };
   }

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/index.ts

@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ export * from './gas_validator.js';
 export * from './phases_validator.js';
 export * from './test_utils.js';
 export * from './allowed_public_setup.js';
+export * from './allowed_setup_helpers.js';
 export * from './archive_cache.js';
 export * from './tx_permitted_validator.js';
 export * from './timestamp_validator.js';
 export * from './size_validator.js';
+export * from './factory.js';

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/metadata_validator.ts

@@ -28,16 +28,24 @@ export class MetadataTxValidator<T extends AnyTx> implements TxValidator<T> {
   validateTx(tx: T): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
     const errors = [];
     if (!this.#hasCorrectL1ChainId(tx)) {
-      errors.push(TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_L1_CHAIN_ID);
+      errors.push(
+        `${TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_L1_CHAIN_ID} (tx: ${tx.data.constants.txContext.chainId.toNumber()}, expected: ${this.values.l1ChainId.toNumber()})`,
+      );
     }
     if (!this.#hasCorrectRollupVersion(tx)) {
-      errors.push(TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_ROLLUP_VERSION);
+      errors.push(
+        `${TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_ROLLUP_VERSION} (tx: ${tx.data.constants.txContext.version.toNumber()}, expected: ${this.values.rollupVersion.toNumber()})`,
+      );
     }
     if (!this.#hasCorrectVkTreeRoot(tx)) {
-      errors.push(TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_VK_TREE_ROOT);
+      errors.push(
+        `${TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_VK_TREE_ROOT} (tx: ${tx.data.constants.vkTreeRoot.toString()}, expected: ${this.values.vkTreeRoot.toString()})`,
+      );
     }
     if (!this.#hasCorrectprotocolContractsHash(tx)) {
-      errors.push(TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_PROTOCOL_CONTRACTS_HASH);
+      errors.push(
+        `${TX_ERROR_INCORRECT_PROTOCOL_CONTRACTS_HASH} (tx: ${tx.data.constants.protocolContractsHash.toString()}, expected: ${this.values.protocolContractsHash.toString()})`,
+      );
     }
     return Promise.resolve(errors.length > 0 ? { result: 'invalid', reason: errors } : { result: 'valid' });
   }

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/nullifier_cache.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+import type { NullifierSource } from '@aztec/p2p';
+import type { MerkleTreeReadOperations } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
+import { MerkleTreeId } from '@aztec/stdlib/trees';
+
+/**
+ * Implements a nullifier source by checking a DB and an in-memory collection.
+ * Intended for validating transactions as they are added to a block.
+ */
+export class NullifierCache implements NullifierSource {
+  nullifiers: Set<string>;
+
+  constructor(private db: MerkleTreeReadOperations) {
+    this.nullifiers = new Set();
+  }
+
+  public async nullifiersExist(nullifiers: Buffer[]): Promise<boolean[]> {
+    const cacheResults = nullifiers.map(n => this.nullifiers.has(n.toString()));
+    const toCheckDb = nullifiers.filter((_n, index) => !cacheResults[index]);
+    const dbHits = await this.db.findLeafIndices(MerkleTreeId.NULLIFIER_TREE, toCheckDb);
+
+    let dbIndex = 0;
+    return nullifiers.map((_n, index) => cacheResults[index] || dbHits[dbIndex++] !== undefined);
+  }
+
+  public addNullifiers(nullifiers: Buffer[]) {
+    for (const nullifier of nullifiers) {
+      this.nullifiers.add(nullifier.toString());
+    }
+  }
+}

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/phases_validator.ts

@@ -1,11 +1,17 @@
+import { NULL_MSG_SENDER_CONTRACT_ADDRESS } from '@aztec/constants';
 import { type Logger, type LoggerBindings, createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
 import { PublicContractsDB, getCallRequestsWithCalldataByPhase } from '@aztec/simulator/server';
+import { AztecAddress } from '@aztec/stdlib/aztec-address';
 import type { ContractDataSource } from '@aztec/stdlib/contract';
 import type { AllowedElement } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
 import {
   type PublicCallRequestWithCalldata,
   TX_ERROR_DURING_VALIDATION,
   TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_NOT_ALLOWED,
+  TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN_CONTRACT,
+  TX_ERROR_SETUP_NULL_MSG_SENDER,
+  TX_ERROR_SETUP_ONLY_SELF_WRONG_SENDER,
+  TX_ERROR_SETUP_WRONG_CALLDATA_LENGTH,
   Tx,
   TxExecutionPhase,
   type TxValidationResult,
@@ -34,7 +40,7 @@ export class PhasesTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
       // which are needed for public FPC flows, but fail if the account contract hasnt been deployed yet,
       // which is what we're trying to do as part of the current txs.
       // We only need to create/revert checkpoint here because of this addNewContracts call.
-      await this.contractsDB.addNewContracts(tx);
+      this.contractsDB.addNewContracts(tx);
 
       if (!tx.data.forPublic) {
         this.#log.debug(
@@ -45,7 +51,8 @@ export class PhasesTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
 
       const setupFns = getCallRequestsWithCalldataByPhase(tx, TxExecutionPhase.SETUP);
       for (const setupFn of setupFns) {
-        if (!(await this.isOnAllowList(setupFn, this.setupAllowList))) {
+        const rejectionReason = await this.checkAllowList(setupFn, this.setupAllowList);
+        if (rejectionReason) {
           this.#log.verbose(
             `Rejecting tx ${tx.getTxHash().toString()} because it calls setup function not on allow list: ${
               setupFn.request.contractAddress
@@ -53,7 +60,7 @@ export class PhasesTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
             { allowList: this.setupAllowList },
           );
 
-          return { result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_NOT_ALLOWED] };
+          return { result: 'invalid', reason: [rejectionReason] };
         }
       }
 
@@ -66,53 +73,101 @@ export class PhasesTxValidator implements TxValidator<Tx> {
     }
   }
 
-  private async isOnAllowList(
+  /** Returns a rejection reason if the call is not on the allow list, or undefined if it is allowed. */
+  private async checkAllowList(
     publicCall: PublicCallRequestWithCalldata,
     allowList: AllowedElement[],
-  ): Promise<boolean> {
+  ): Promise<string | undefined> {
     if (publicCall.isEmpty()) {
-      return true;
+      return undefined;
     }
 
     const contractAddress = publicCall.request.contractAddress;
     const functionSelector = publicCall.functionSelector;
 
-    // do these checks first since they don't require the contract class
+    // Check address-based entries first since they don't require the contract class.
     for (const entry of allowList) {
-      if ('address' in entry && !('selector' in entry)) {
-        if (contractAddress.equals(entry.address)) {
-          return true;
-        }
-      }
-
-      if ('address' in entry && 'selector' in entry) {
+      if ('address' in entry) {
         if (contractAddress.equals(entry.address) && entry.selector.equals(functionSelector)) {
-          return true;
+          if (entry.calldataLength !== undefined && publicCall.calldata.length !== entry.calldataLength) {
+            return TX_ERROR_SETUP_WRONG_CALLDATA_LENGTH;
+          }
+          if (entry.onlySelf && !publicCall.request.msgSender.equals(contractAddress)) {
+            return TX_ERROR_SETUP_ONLY_SELF_WRONG_SENDER;
+          }
+          if (
+            entry.rejectNullMsgSender &&
+            publicCall.request.msgSender.equals(AztecAddress.fromBigInt(NULL_MSG_SENDER_CONTRACT_ADDRESS))
+          ) {
+            return TX_ERROR_SETUP_NULL_MSG_SENDER;
+          }
+          return undefined;
         }
       }
+    }
 
-      const contractClass = await this.contractsDB.getContractInstance(contractAddress, this.timestamp);
-
-      if (!contractClass) {
-        throw new Error(`Contract not found: ${contractAddress}`);
+    // Check class-based entries. Fetch the contract instance lazily (only once).
+    let contractClassId: undefined | { value: string | undefined };
+    for (const entry of allowList) {
+      if (!('classId' in entry)) {
+        continue;
       }
 
-      if ('classId' in entry && !('selector' in entry)) {
-        if (contractClass.currentContractClassId.equals(entry.classId)) {
-          return true;
+      if (contractClassId === undefined) {
+        const instance = await this.contractsDB.getContractInstance(contractAddress, this.timestamp);
+        contractClassId = { value: instance?.currentContractClassId.toString() };
+        if (!contractClassId.value) {
+          return TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_UNKNOWN_CONTRACT;
         }
       }
 
-      if ('classId' in entry && 'selector' in entry) {
+      if (contractClassId.value === entry.classId.toString() && entry.selector.equals(functionSelector)) {
+        if (entry.calldataLength !== undefined && publicCall.calldata.length !== entry.calldataLength) {
+          return TX_ERROR_SETUP_WRONG_CALLDATA_LENGTH;
+        }
+        if (entry.onlySelf && !publicCall.request.msgSender.equals(contractAddress)) {
+          return TX_ERROR_SETUP_ONLY_SELF_WRONG_SENDER;
+        }
         if (
-          contractClass.currentContractClassId.equals(entry.classId) &&
-          (entry.selector === undefined || entry.selector.equals(functionSelector))
+          entry.rejectNullMsgSender &&
+          publicCall.request.msgSender.equals(AztecAddress.fromBigInt(NULL_MSG_SENDER_CONTRACT_ADDRESS))
         ) {
-          return true;
+          return TX_ERROR_SETUP_NULL_MSG_SENDER;
         }
+        return undefined;
       }
     }
 
-    return false;
+    return TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_NOT_ALLOWED;
+  }
+}
+
+/** Structural interface for the allowed-setup-calls flag check. */
+export interface HasAllowedSetupCallsData {
+  txHash: { toString(): string };
+  allowedSetupCalls: boolean;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Validates that a transaction's setup-phase calls were allowed at receipt time.
+ *
+ * Checks the precomputed `allowedSetupCalls` flag on TxMetaData. The flag is
+ * computed by running the PhasesTxValidator on the full Tx when it first enters
+ * the pool. This lightweight validator is used during pending pool migration to
+ * reject txs whose setup calls are not on the allow list.
+ */
+export class AllowedSetupCallsMetaValidator<T extends HasAllowedSetupCallsData> implements TxValidator<T> {
+  #log: Logger;
+
+  constructor(bindings?: LoggerBindings) {
+    this.#log = createLogger('sequencer:tx_validator:tx_phases_meta', bindings);
+  }
+
+  validateTx(tx: T): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
+    if (!tx.allowedSetupCalls) {
+      this.#log.verbose(`Rejecting tx ${tx.txHash} because its setup calls are not on the allow list`);
+      return Promise.resolve({ result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_SETUP_FUNCTION_NOT_ALLOWED] });
+    }
+    return Promise.resolve({ result: 'valid' });
   }
 }

package/src/msg_validators/tx_validator/timestamp_validator.ts

@@ -1,15 +1,24 @@
-import { BlockNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
+import type { BlockNumber } from '@aztec/foundation/branded-types';
 import { type Logger, type LoggerBindings, createLogger } from '@aztec/foundation/log';
-import {
-  type AnyTx,
-  TX_ERROR_INVALID_INCLUDE_BY_TIMESTAMP,
-  type TxValidationResult,
-  type TxValidator,
-  getTxHash,
-} from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
+import { TX_ERROR_INVALID_EXPIRATION_TIMESTAMP, type TxValidationResult, type TxValidator } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
 import type { UInt64 } from '@aztec/stdlib/types';
 
-export class TimestampTxValidator<T extends AnyTx> implements TxValidator<T> {
+/** Structural interface for timestamp validation. */
+export interface HasTimestampData {
+  txHash: { toString(): string };
+  data: {
+    expirationTimestamp: bigint;
+    constants: {
+      anchorBlockHeader: {
+        globalVariables: {
+          blockNumber: BlockNumber;
+        };
+      };
+    };
+  };
+}
+
+export class TimestampTxValidator<T extends HasTimestampData> implements TxValidator<T> {
   #log: Logger;
 
   constructor(
@@ -26,25 +35,21 @@ export class TimestampTxValidator<T extends AnyTx> implements TxValidator<T> {
   }
 
   validateTx(tx: T): Promise<TxValidationResult> {
-    const includeByTimestamp = tx.data.includeByTimestamp;
-    // If building block 1, we skip the expiration check. For details on why see the `validate_include_by_timestamp`
+    const expirationTimestamp = tx.data.expirationTimestamp;
+    // If building block 1, we skip the expiration check. For details on why see the `validate_expiration_timestamp`
     // function in `noir-projects/noir-protocol-circuits/crates/rollup-lib/src/base/components/validation_requests.nr`.
     const buildingBlock1 = this.values.blockNumber === 1;
 
-    if (!buildingBlock1 && includeByTimestamp < this.values.timestamp) {
+    if (!buildingBlock1 && expirationTimestamp < this.values.timestamp) {
       if (tx.data.constants.anchorBlockHeader.globalVariables.blockNumber === 0) {
         this.#log.warn(
           `A tx built against a genesis block failed to be included in block 1 which is the only block in which txs built against a genesis block are allowed to be included.`,
         );
       }
       this.#log.verbose(
-        `Rejecting tx ${getTxHash(
-          tx,
-        )} for low expiration timestamp. Tx expiration timestamp: ${includeByTimestamp}, timestamp: ${
-          this.values.timestamp
-        }.`,
+        `Rejecting tx ${tx.txHash} for low expiration timestamp. Tx expiration timestamp: ${expirationTimestamp}, timestamp: ${this.values.timestamp}.`,
       );
-      return Promise.resolve({ result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_INVALID_INCLUDE_BY_TIMESTAMP] });
+      return Promise.resolve({ result: 'invalid', reason: [TX_ERROR_INVALID_EXPIRATION_TIMESTAMP] });
     } else {
       return Promise.resolve({ result: 'valid' });
     }

package/src/services/data_store.ts

@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ export class AztecDatastore implements Datastore {
   #memoryDatastore: Map<string, MemoryItem>;
   #dbDatastore: AztecAsyncMap<string, Uint8Array>;
 
-  #batchOps: BatchOp[] = [];
-
   private maxMemoryItems: number;
 
   constructor(db: AztecAsyncKVStore, { maxMemoryItems } = { maxMemoryItems: 50 }) {
@@ -92,23 +90,17 @@ export class AztecDatastore implements Datastore {
   }
 
   batch(): Batch {
+    const ops: BatchOp[] = [];
     return {
       put: (key, value) => {
-        this.#batchOps.push({
-          type: 'put',
-          key,
-          value,
-        });
+        ops.push({ type: 'put', key, value });
       },
       delete: key => {
-        this.#batchOps.push({
-          type: 'del',
-          key,
-        });
+        ops.push({ type: 'del', key });
       },
       commit: async () => {
         await this.#db.transactionAsync(async () => {
-          for (const op of this.#batchOps) {
+          for (const op of ops) {
             if (op.type === 'put' && op.value) {
               await this.put(op.key, op.value);
             } else if (op.type === 'del') {
@@ -116,7 +108,7 @@ export class AztecDatastore implements Datastore {
             }
           }
         });
-        this.#batchOps = []; // Clear operations after commit
+        ops.length = 0;
       },
     };
   }

package/src/services/dummy_service.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import type { EthAddress } from '@aztec/foundation/eth-address';
 import type { PeerInfo } from '@aztec/stdlib/interfaces/server';
-import type { Gossipable, PeerErrorSeverity } from '@aztec/stdlib/p2p';
+import type { CheckpointProposalCore, Gossipable, PeerErrorSeverity, TopicType } from '@aztec/stdlib/p2p';
 import { Tx, TxHash } from '@aztec/stdlib/tx';
 
 import type { PeerId } from '@libp2p/interface';
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ import { ReqRespStatus } from './reqresp/status.js';
 import {
   type P2PBlockReceivedCallback,
   type P2PCheckpointReceivedCallback,
+  type P2PDuplicateAttestationCallback,
+  type P2PDuplicateProposalCallback,
   type P2PService,
   type PeerDiscoveryService,
   PeerDiscoveryState,
@@ -42,6 +44,10 @@ export class DummyP2PService implements P2PService {
     return [];
   }
 
+  getGossipMeshPeerCount(_topicType: TopicType): number {
+    return 0;
+  }
+
   /**
    * Starts the dummy implementation.
    * @returns A resolved promise.
@@ -80,7 +86,22 @@ export class DummyP2PService implements P2PService {
   /**
    * Register a callback into the validator client for when a checkpoint proposal is received
    */
-  public registerCheckpointReceivedCallback(_callback: P2PCheckpointReceivedCallback) {}
+  public registerValidatorCheckpointReceivedCallback(_callback: P2PCheckpointReceivedCallback) {}
+  public registerAllNodesCheckpointReceivedCallback(_callback: P2PCheckpointReceivedCallback) {}
+
+  public notifyOwnCheckpointProposal(_checkpoint: CheckpointProposalCore): Promise<void> {
+    return Promise.resolve();
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Register a callback for when a duplicate proposal is detected
+   */
+  public registerDuplicateProposalCallback(_callback: P2PDuplicateProposalCallback): void {}
+
+  /**
+   * Register a callback for when a duplicate attestation is detected
+   */
+  public registerDuplicateAttestationCallback(_callback: P2PDuplicateAttestationCallback): void {}
 
   /**
    * Sends a request to a peer.
@@ -125,14 +146,10 @@ export class DummyP2PService implements P2PService {
     return undefined;
   }
 
-  validate(_txs: Tx[]): Promise<void> {
+  validateTxsReceivedInBlockProposal(_txs: Tx[]): Promise<void> {
     return Promise.resolve();
   }
 
-  validatePropagatedTx(_tx: Tx, _peerId: PeerId): Promise<boolean> {
-    return Promise.resolve(true);
-  }
-
   addReqRespSubProtocol(
     _subProtocol: ReqRespSubProtocol,
     _handler: ReqRespSubProtocolHandler,
@@ -270,6 +287,7 @@ export class DummyPeerManager implements PeerManagerInterface {
 
 export class DummyReqResp implements ReqRespInterface {
   updateConfig(_config: Partial<P2PReqRespConfig>): void {}
+  setShouldRejectPeer(): void {}
   start(
     _subProtocolHandlers: ReqRespSubProtocolHandlers,
     _subProtocolValidators: ReqRespSubProtocolValidators,