@axiapps/axi-design 1.40.0 → 1.42.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/dist/axi.css CHANGED
@@ -54,6 +54,63 @@
54
54
  own token, and a theme that goes translucent restates it near-opaque
55
55
  without giving up the tint on everything that merely sits still. */
56
56
  --axi-surface-float: var(--axi-surface);
57
+ /* --- a surface as a single paint --- */
58
+ /* The three surface tokens above, each reduced to one flat <color>.
59
+
60
+ They exist because a surface token is allowed to hold a gradient - rule 1's
61
+ one relief, which is how a glass theme exists at all - and a token holding
62
+ a gradient can only ever BE a background. `fill` takes <paint> and not
63
+ <image>. `color-mix()` takes colours and nothing else. `background-color`
64
+ and `border-color` take a colour. So every consumer that wanted a
65
+ surface-coloured chart fill, or a surface mixed some way toward the accent,
66
+ had nothing in this language to ask for.
67
+
68
+ Nothing in this package noticed, because every component here paints a
69
+ surface through the `background` shorthand, where an image is welcome. The
70
+ cost landed downstream, and the way it lands is silent: an invalid `fill`
71
+ is dropped at computed-value time, and `fill` inherits, so the element
72
+ adopts its ancestor's paint rather than showing anything wrong. Measured in
73
+ axibridge under the flat theme - a chart's brush slide and its bar cursor
74
+ both computed rgb(0, 0, 0), and a heat ramp built on color-mix() lost its
75
+ fill altogether. The app had papered over the glass half by pinning two
76
+ flat values of its own by eye, and had no way to paper over flat.
77
+
78
+ Why a companion rather than splitting each surface into a colour and an
79
+ `-image` half, the way --axi-ground is split. That was tried first and
80
+ measured. It works for the ground because the ground is OPAQUE: the colour
81
+ is the page and the image is light added over it. It does not transfer to a
82
+ translucent surface, where the gradient is not light on a fill, it IS the
83
+ fill - alpha and all. Painting a glass panel as an absolute gradient over a
84
+ flat base composites the two and takes the panel from .55 to .77 opacity,
85
+ which is 15 RGB steps of visible change. Fitting a base and a modulation
86
+ that reproduce the original to within 2 steps is possible, and the fit
87
+ lands on rgba(28, 41, 65, .361) - a set of constants no one can maintain,
88
+ carrying an alpha .12 below the surface it is meant to be a reduction of,
89
+ which would make a chart fill read as a different material from the panel
90
+ beside it. A translucent surface genuinely is an image, and "that surface
91
+ as one flat paint" is genuinely a second thing derived from it.
92
+
93
+ What the value has to be is not a judgement each theme makes fresh: it is
94
+ the midpoint of that theme's gradient, the colour the gradient is a spread
95
+ around. Both shipped themes confirm it independently - flat's two midpoints
96
+ come out at exactly the #1a1f2e and #222838 its own notes call "axibridge's
97
+ flat values", and glass's two land within three per channel, at an
98
+ identical alpha, of the pair axibridge had already pinned by eye. The
99
+ colour was always there; it was never a token.
100
+
101
+ Aliased here because the main theme's surfaces are flat colours already, so
102
+ there is nothing to reduce. A theme that puts an image in a surface token
103
+ must restate that token's companion, or the alias hands the image straight
104
+ back - themes.test.mjs asserts exactly that, and it is the only way this
105
+ token can go wrong. Note the float's companion follows --axi-surface-paint
106
+ and NOT --axi-surface-float: the float's own default is var(--axi-surface),
107
+ so aliasing the float would walk the chain back into a theme's gradient in
108
+ any theme that restates the surface and leaves the float alone - which is
109
+ what flat does. */
110
+ --axi-surface-paint: var(--axi-surface);
111
+ --axi-surface-raised-paint: var(--axi-surface-raised);
112
+ --axi-surface-float-paint: var(--axi-surface-paint);
113
+
57
114
  --axi-ink-line: #0c0e12; /* the outline every raised element is drawn with */
58
115
  /* The tone a shape is made of when it is made of the line ink rather than
59
116
  outlined in it - the tooltip, the titlebar strip, the switch's slug. Holds
@@ -1181,8 +1238,6 @@ button.axi-panel--tile:hover,
1181
1238
  transform: rotate(45deg);
1182
1239
  }
1183
1240
  .axi-radio:checked::after { opacity: 1; }
1184
- .axi-check:disabled,
1185
- .axi-radio:disabled { cursor: not-allowed; opacity: .5; }
1186
1241
 
1187
1242
  /* ---------- textarea ---------- */
1188
1243
  /* Not a component: the same .axi-input a single-line field uses, with the two
@@ -3055,7 +3110,8 @@ textarea.axi-input {
3055
3110
 
3056
3111
  /* --- utilities.css --- */
3057
3112
  /* axi design language - utilities.
3058
- Two families of single-purpose class, and the file is last in the cascade
3113
+ Two families of single-purpose class and one state, and the file is last in
3114
+ the cascade
3059
3115
  because that is the whole point of it: a utility has to be able to overrule
3060
3116
  the component it sits inside, and it is not allowed to buy that with
3061
3117
  !important or with a padded selector.
@@ -3108,3 +3164,73 @@ textarea.axi-input {
3108
3164
  .axi-edge-accent { border-color: var(--axi-accent); }
3109
3165
  .axi-edge-rule { border-color: var(--axi-rule); }
3110
3166
  .axi-edge-line { border-color: var(--axi-ink-line); }
3167
+
3168
+ /* ---------- the dead state ---------- */
3169
+ /* Twenty-four things in this language are interactive: twenty-three declare
3170
+ `cursor: pointer`, and the twenty-fourth is `.axi-input`, which both the
3171
+ single-line field and the textarea wear. Before this rule, two of the
3172
+ twenty-four said anything at all when they were disabled - the checkbox and
3173
+ the radio, which got `opacity: .5; cursor: not-allowed` in forms.css. The
3174
+ other twenty-three were, computed-style for computed-style, indistinguishable
3175
+ from their working selves: a disabled `.axi-btn` drew the same fill, the same
3176
+ border and the same ink as an enabled one, and still told the cursor it was a
3177
+ pointer. The control did not merely fail to look dead; it actively promised
3178
+ it was alive.
3179
+
3180
+ So every consumer invented the state. In the app this language was built
3181
+ for, twenty-four sites had written `disabled:opacity-50
3182
+ disabled:cursor-not-allowed` by hand - the same two declarations forms.css
3183
+ already contained, retyped once per control - and a replay stepper had
3184
+ invented a third answer, swapping the ink to a dimmer token instead.
3185
+
3186
+ Why opacity and the cursor, and deliberately nothing else. A disabled
3187
+ control has to stay recognisable as the control it is: whatever fill, border
3188
+ and ink said "primary button" or "danger action" a moment ago must still say
3189
+ it, only faded. Opacity does that to every layer at once without naming any
3190
+ of them, which is also the one form this can take that does not fight the
3191
+ ink layer below - the stepper's colour swap is exactly the defect the ink
3192
+ layer exists to prevent, because a disabled `.axi-action.axi-ink-danger`
3193
+ would lose its verdict rather than fade with it.
3194
+
3195
+ Why this file. A disabled state has to overrule the resting rule of the
3196
+ component it sits inside, and it is not allowed to buy that with
3197
+ !important - which is this file's whole reason for existing, and the reason
3198
+ the state lives here rather than beside each component. `:is()` carries its
3199
+ most specific argument's weight, so each of these selectors weighs one class
3200
+ and one pseudo-class: enough to beat any component's own resting rule, and
3201
+ nothing upstream sets `cursor` or `opacity` on a hover that could out-rank
3202
+ it.
3203
+
3204
+ Pointer events are left alone. `:disabled` already blocks activation
3205
+ natively, and `[aria-disabled="true"]` means "focusable, but ignore the
3206
+ action" - a control the reader can still reach and still read a title from.
3207
+ Removing pointer events would take away the tooltip that explains why the
3208
+ thing is dead, which is the one piece of help a dead control can offer. */
3209
+ .axi-accordion__head:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3210
+ .axi-action:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3211
+ .axi-btn:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3212
+ .axi-card:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3213
+ .axi-check:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3214
+ .axi-chip--action:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3215
+ .axi-drawer__close:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3216
+ .axi-input:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3217
+ .axi-link:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3218
+ .axi-palette__row:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3219
+ .axi-palette__trigger:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3220
+ .axi-picker__btn:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3221
+ .axi-picker__opt:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3222
+ .axi-pill:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3223
+ .axi-radio:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3224
+ .axi-rail__item:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3225
+ .axi-rail__subitem:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3226
+ .axi-select:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3227
+ .axi-switch:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3228
+ .axi-table__sort:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3229
+ .axi-menu__pop label:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3230
+ .axi-prose a:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3231
+ .axi-tabs a:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3232
+ .axi-tabs button:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
3233
+ .axi-titlebar__btns button:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]) {
3234
+ opacity: .5;
3235
+ cursor: not-allowed;
3236
+ }
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
4
4
  [data-axi-theme="flat"] {
5
5
  --axi-ground: #090b10;
6
6
  --axi-surface: linear-gradient(#1c2130, #181d2c);
7
+ --axi-surface-paint: #1a1f2e;
7
8
  --axi-surface-raised: linear-gradient(#242a3b, #202636);
9
+ --axi-surface-raised-paint: #222838;
8
10
  --axi-well-fill: #141822;
9
11
  --axi-ink-line: rgba(255, 255, 255, .10);
10
12
  --axi-rule: rgba(255, 255, 255, .07);
@@ -5,8 +5,11 @@
5
5
  --axi-ground: #0a0c10;
6
6
  --axi-ground-image: radial-gradient(900px 500px at 15% 0%, rgba(120, 90, 255, .30), transparent 60%), radial-gradient(700px 500px at 95% 30%, rgba(0, 190, 255, .22), transparent 62%), radial-gradient(600px 600px at 60% 100%, rgba(255, 90, 170, .20), transparent 60%);
7
7
  --axi-surface: linear-gradient(145deg, rgba(58, 68, 92, .55), rgba(28, 33, 46, .42));
8
+ --axi-surface-paint: rgba(43, 50, 69, .485);
8
9
  --axi-surface-raised: linear-gradient(145deg, rgba(86, 99, 130, .5), rgba(44, 52, 71, .38));
10
+ --axi-surface-raised-paint: rgba(65, 76, 100, .44);
9
11
  --axi-surface-float: linear-gradient(145deg, rgba(38, 45, 62, .97), rgba(22, 26, 36, .97));
12
+ --axi-surface-float-paint: rgba(30, 36, 49, .97);
10
13
  --axi-surface-filter: blur(18px) saturate(140%);
11
14
  --axi-ink-line: rgba(180, 200, 255, .16);
12
15
  --axi-rule: rgba(180, 200, 255, .14);
package/docs/RULES.md CHANGED
@@ -22,6 +22,23 @@ what lets a glass theme exist without one component ever learning the word
22
22
  "glass". A component cannot reach for that exception, because it cannot see it:
23
23
  what it reads is the same surface token it was already reading.
24
24
 
25
+ That relief has a consequence worth stating next to it, because it is not
26
+ visible from inside this package. A surface token that may hold a gradient can
27
+ only ever *be* a background: `fill` takes `<paint>` and not `<image>`,
28
+ `color-mix()` takes colours only, `background-color` and `border-color` take a
29
+ colour. Every component here paints a surface through the `background`
30
+ shorthand and so never meets this — but a consumer wanting a surface-coloured
31
+ chart fill, or a surface mixed some way toward the accent, has nothing to ask
32
+ for, and the failure is silent: an invalid `fill` drops at computed-value time
33
+ and `fill` inherits, so the element takes its ancestor's paint and renders
34
+ something plausible. So each surface has a **`-paint` companion** —
35
+ `--axi-surface-paint`, `--axi-surface-raised-paint`,
36
+ `--axi-surface-float-paint` — holding the same surface as one flat `<color>`.
37
+ Paint a surface with the surface token; reach for the companion wherever only a
38
+ colour is valid. A theme that grades a surface must restate that surface's
39
+ companion, and `themes.test.mjs` asserts it: the companions are aliased to the
40
+ surfaces, so a theme that forgets one hands its gradient straight back.
41
+
25
42
  ## 2. No colour at partial opacity over the ground
26
43
 
27
44
  If a colour is present it is at full strength. A muted gold over near-black is
@@ -490,6 +507,8 @@ Three layers, in `src/tokens.css` — the only file permitted to contain a colou
490
507
  literal.
491
508
 
492
509
  - **Surface & text** — `--axi-ground`, `--axi-surface`, `--axi-surface-raised`,
510
+ `--axi-surface-float`, their three `-paint` companions (the same surfaces as a
511
+ single `<color>`, for `fill`, `color-mix()` and the `*-color` properties),
493
512
  `--axi-ink-line`, `--axi-ground-deep`, `--axi-rule`, `--axi-text`,
494
513
  `--axi-text-dim`, `--axi-text-faint`, `--axi-scrim`
495
514
  - **Accent & status** — `--axi-accent`, `--axi-accent-ink`, `--axi-meta`,
@@ -631,7 +650,9 @@ first step back toward theme-only components.
631
650
 
632
651
  Rules 1 and 2 name the relief a theme gets in the surface layer: a theme may
633
652
  put a gradient on a surface and may hold a surface token at partial opacity. It
634
- may not mute an ink. Read those two rules for why.
653
+ may not mute an ink. Read those two rules for why. A theme taking the gradient
654
+ half of that relief owes the `-paint` companion of every surface it grades —
655
+ see rule 1.
635
656
 
636
657
  The relief is not confined to that layer, though, and the first draft of this
637
658
  section said it was. **A theme may also restate the block and the corner** —
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@axiapps/axi-design",
3
- "version": "1.40.0",
3
+ "version": "1.42.0",
4
4
  "description": "The design language for the axi suite — flat and outlined, dark, drawn in saturated ink.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "license": "MIT",
package/src/forms.css CHANGED
@@ -73,8 +73,6 @@
73
73
  transform: rotate(45deg);
74
74
  }
75
75
  .axi-radio:checked::after { opacity: 1; }
76
- .axi-check:disabled,
77
- .axi-radio:disabled { cursor: not-allowed; opacity: .5; }
78
76
 
79
77
  /* ---------- textarea ---------- */
80
78
  /* Not a component: the same .axi-input a single-line field uses, with the two
package/src/tokens.css CHANGED
@@ -50,6 +50,63 @@
50
50
  own token, and a theme that goes translucent restates it near-opaque
51
51
  without giving up the tint on everything that merely sits still. */
52
52
  --axi-surface-float: var(--axi-surface);
53
+ /* --- a surface as a single paint --- */
54
+ /* The three surface tokens above, each reduced to one flat <color>.
55
+
56
+ They exist because a surface token is allowed to hold a gradient - rule 1's
57
+ one relief, which is how a glass theme exists at all - and a token holding
58
+ a gradient can only ever BE a background. `fill` takes <paint> and not
59
+ <image>. `color-mix()` takes colours and nothing else. `background-color`
60
+ and `border-color` take a colour. So every consumer that wanted a
61
+ surface-coloured chart fill, or a surface mixed some way toward the accent,
62
+ had nothing in this language to ask for.
63
+
64
+ Nothing in this package noticed, because every component here paints a
65
+ surface through the `background` shorthand, where an image is welcome. The
66
+ cost landed downstream, and the way it lands is silent: an invalid `fill`
67
+ is dropped at computed-value time, and `fill` inherits, so the element
68
+ adopts its ancestor's paint rather than showing anything wrong. Measured in
69
+ axibridge under the flat theme - a chart's brush slide and its bar cursor
70
+ both computed rgb(0, 0, 0), and a heat ramp built on color-mix() lost its
71
+ fill altogether. The app had papered over the glass half by pinning two
72
+ flat values of its own by eye, and had no way to paper over flat.
73
+
74
+ Why a companion rather than splitting each surface into a colour and an
75
+ `-image` half, the way --axi-ground is split. That was tried first and
76
+ measured. It works for the ground because the ground is OPAQUE: the colour
77
+ is the page and the image is light added over it. It does not transfer to a
78
+ translucent surface, where the gradient is not light on a fill, it IS the
79
+ fill - alpha and all. Painting a glass panel as an absolute gradient over a
80
+ flat base composites the two and takes the panel from .55 to .77 opacity,
81
+ which is 15 RGB steps of visible change. Fitting a base and a modulation
82
+ that reproduce the original to within 2 steps is possible, and the fit
83
+ lands on rgba(28, 41, 65, .361) - a set of constants no one can maintain,
84
+ carrying an alpha .12 below the surface it is meant to be a reduction of,
85
+ which would make a chart fill read as a different material from the panel
86
+ beside it. A translucent surface genuinely is an image, and "that surface
87
+ as one flat paint" is genuinely a second thing derived from it.
88
+
89
+ What the value has to be is not a judgement each theme makes fresh: it is
90
+ the midpoint of that theme's gradient, the colour the gradient is a spread
91
+ around. Both shipped themes confirm it independently - flat's two midpoints
92
+ come out at exactly the #1a1f2e and #222838 its own notes call "axibridge's
93
+ flat values", and glass's two land within three per channel, at an
94
+ identical alpha, of the pair axibridge had already pinned by eye. The
95
+ colour was always there; it was never a token.
96
+
97
+ Aliased here because the main theme's surfaces are flat colours already, so
98
+ there is nothing to reduce. A theme that puts an image in a surface token
99
+ must restate that token's companion, or the alias hands the image straight
100
+ back - themes.test.mjs asserts exactly that, and it is the only way this
101
+ token can go wrong. Note the float's companion follows --axi-surface-paint
102
+ and NOT --axi-surface-float: the float's own default is var(--axi-surface),
103
+ so aliasing the float would walk the chain back into a theme's gradient in
104
+ any theme that restates the surface and leaves the float alone - which is
105
+ what flat does. */
106
+ --axi-surface-paint: var(--axi-surface);
107
+ --axi-surface-raised-paint: var(--axi-surface-raised);
108
+ --axi-surface-float-paint: var(--axi-surface-paint);
109
+
53
110
  --axi-ink-line: #0c0e12; /* the outline every raised element is drawn with */
54
111
  /* The tone a shape is made of when it is made of the line ink rather than
55
112
  outlined in it - the tooltip, the titlebar strip, the switch's slug. Holds
package/src/utilities.css CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
1
1
  /* axi design language - utilities.
2
- Two families of single-purpose class, and the file is last in the cascade
2
+ Two families of single-purpose class and one state, and the file is last in
3
+ the cascade
3
4
  because that is the whole point of it: a utility has to be able to overrule
4
5
  the component it sits inside, and it is not allowed to buy that with
5
6
  !important or with a padded selector.
@@ -52,3 +53,73 @@
52
53
  .axi-edge-accent { border-color: var(--axi-accent); }
53
54
  .axi-edge-rule { border-color: var(--axi-rule); }
54
55
  .axi-edge-line { border-color: var(--axi-ink-line); }
56
+
57
+ /* ---------- the dead state ---------- */
58
+ /* Twenty-four things in this language are interactive: twenty-three declare
59
+ `cursor: pointer`, and the twenty-fourth is `.axi-input`, which both the
60
+ single-line field and the textarea wear. Before this rule, two of the
61
+ twenty-four said anything at all when they were disabled - the checkbox and
62
+ the radio, which got `opacity: .5; cursor: not-allowed` in forms.css. The
63
+ other twenty-three were, computed-style for computed-style, indistinguishable
64
+ from their working selves: a disabled `.axi-btn` drew the same fill, the same
65
+ border and the same ink as an enabled one, and still told the cursor it was a
66
+ pointer. The control did not merely fail to look dead; it actively promised
67
+ it was alive.
68
+
69
+ So every consumer invented the state. In the app this language was built
70
+ for, twenty-four sites had written `disabled:opacity-50
71
+ disabled:cursor-not-allowed` by hand - the same two declarations forms.css
72
+ already contained, retyped once per control - and a replay stepper had
73
+ invented a third answer, swapping the ink to a dimmer token instead.
74
+
75
+ Why opacity and the cursor, and deliberately nothing else. A disabled
76
+ control has to stay recognisable as the control it is: whatever fill, border
77
+ and ink said "primary button" or "danger action" a moment ago must still say
78
+ it, only faded. Opacity does that to every layer at once without naming any
79
+ of them, which is also the one form this can take that does not fight the
80
+ ink layer below - the stepper's colour swap is exactly the defect the ink
81
+ layer exists to prevent, because a disabled `.axi-action.axi-ink-danger`
82
+ would lose its verdict rather than fade with it.
83
+
84
+ Why this file. A disabled state has to overrule the resting rule of the
85
+ component it sits inside, and it is not allowed to buy that with
86
+ !important - which is this file's whole reason for existing, and the reason
87
+ the state lives here rather than beside each component. `:is()` carries its
88
+ most specific argument's weight, so each of these selectors weighs one class
89
+ and one pseudo-class: enough to beat any component's own resting rule, and
90
+ nothing upstream sets `cursor` or `opacity` on a hover that could out-rank
91
+ it.
92
+
93
+ Pointer events are left alone. `:disabled` already blocks activation
94
+ natively, and `[aria-disabled="true"]` means "focusable, but ignore the
95
+ action" - a control the reader can still reach and still read a title from.
96
+ Removing pointer events would take away the tooltip that explains why the
97
+ thing is dead, which is the one piece of help a dead control can offer. */
98
+ .axi-accordion__head:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
99
+ .axi-action:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
100
+ .axi-btn:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
101
+ .axi-card:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
102
+ .axi-check:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
103
+ .axi-chip--action:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
104
+ .axi-drawer__close:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
105
+ .axi-input:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
106
+ .axi-link:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
107
+ .axi-palette__row:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
108
+ .axi-palette__trigger:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
109
+ .axi-picker__btn:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
110
+ .axi-picker__opt:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
111
+ .axi-pill:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
112
+ .axi-radio:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
113
+ .axi-rail__item:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
114
+ .axi-rail__subitem:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
115
+ .axi-select:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
116
+ .axi-switch:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
117
+ .axi-table__sort:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
118
+ .axi-menu__pop label:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
119
+ .axi-prose a:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
120
+ .axi-tabs a:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
121
+ .axi-tabs button:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]),
122
+ .axi-titlebar__btns button:is(:disabled, [aria-disabled="true"]) {
123
+ opacity: .5;
124
+ cursor: not-allowed;
125
+ }