@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions 3.352.0

package/dist-types/commands/ListPolicyTemplatesCommand.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+import { EndpointParameterInstructions } from "@aws-sdk/middleware-endpoint";
+import { Command as $Command } from "@aws-sdk/smithy-client";
+import { Handler, HttpHandlerOptions as __HttpHandlerOptions, MetadataBearer as __MetadataBearer, MiddlewareStack } from "@aws-sdk/types";
+import { ListPolicyTemplatesInput, ListPolicyTemplatesOutput } from "../models/models_0";
+import { ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig } from "../VerifiedPermissionsClient";
+/**
+ * @public
+ */
+export { __MetadataBearer, $Command };
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The input for {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommand}.
+ */
+export interface ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput extends ListPolicyTemplatesInput {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The output of {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommand}.
+ */
+export interface ListPolicyTemplatesCommandOutput extends ListPolicyTemplatesOutput, __MetadataBearer {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ * <p>Returns a paginated list of all policy templates in the specified policy store.</p>
+ * @example
+ * Use a bare-bones client and the command you need to make an API call.
+ * ```javascript
+ * import { VerifiedPermissionsClient, ListPolicyTemplatesCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"; // ES Modules import
+ * // const { VerifiedPermissionsClient, ListPolicyTemplatesCommand } = require("@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"); // CommonJS import
+ * const client = new VerifiedPermissionsClient(config);
+ * const input = { // ListPolicyTemplatesInput
+ *   policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ *   nextToken: "STRING_VALUE",
+ *   maxResults: Number("int"),
+ * };
+ * const command = new ListPolicyTemplatesCommand(input);
+ * const response = await client.send(command);
+ * // { // ListPolicyTemplatesOutput
+ * //   nextToken: "STRING_VALUE",
+ * //   policyTemplates: [ // PolicyTemplatesList // required
+ * //     { // PolicyTemplateItem
+ * //       policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ * //       policyTemplateId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ * //       description: "STRING_VALUE",
+ * //       createdDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * //       lastUpdatedDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * //     },
+ * //   ],
+ * // };
+ *
+ * ```
+ *
+ * @param ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput - {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput}
+ * @returns {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommandOutput}
+ * @see {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput} for command's `input` shape.
+ * @see {@link ListPolicyTemplatesCommandOutput} for command's `response` shape.
+ * @see {@link VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig | config} for VerifiedPermissionsClient's `config` shape.
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ResourceNotFoundException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it references a resource that doesn't exist.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link AccessDeniedException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>You don't have sufficient access to perform this action.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link InternalServerException} (server fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because of an internal error. Try your request again later</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ThrottlingException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it exceeded a throttling quota.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ValidationException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because one or more input parameters don't satisfy their constraint
+ *             requirements. The output is provided as a list of fields and a reason for each field that
+ *             isn't valid.</p>
+ *          <p>The possible reasons include the following:</p>
+ *          <ul>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedEntityType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an entity type that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedActionId</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action id that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>InvalidActionApplication</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action that, according to the schema, doesn't support
+ *                     the specified principal and resource.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnexpectedType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy included an operand that isn't a valid type for the specified
+ *                     operation.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>IncompatibleTypes</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The types of elements included in a <code>set</code>, or the types of
+ *                     expressions used in an <code>if...then...else</code> clause aren't compatible in
+ *                     this context.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>MissingAttribute</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that isn't
+ *                     specified in the schema. Test for the existence of the attribute first before
+ *                     attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnsafeOptionalAttributeAccess</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that is optional
+ *                     and isn't guaranteed to be present. Test for the existence of the attribute
+ *                     first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the
+ *                         <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>ImpossiblePolicy</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar has determined that a policy condition always evaluates to false. If
+ *                     the policy is always false, it can never apply to any query, and so it can never
+ *                     affect an authorization decision.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>WrongNumberArguments</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy references an extension type with the wrong number of
+ *                     arguments.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>FunctionArgumentValidationError</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar couldn't parse the argument passed to an extension type. For example,
+ *                     a string that is to be parsed as an IPv4 address can contain only digits and the
+ *                     period character.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *          </ul>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link VerifiedPermissionsServiceException}
+ * <p>Base exception class for all service exceptions from VerifiedPermissions service.</p>
+ *
+ */
+export declare class ListPolicyTemplatesCommand extends $Command<ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput, ListPolicyTemplatesCommandOutput, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig> {
+    readonly input: ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput;
+    static getEndpointParameterInstructions(): EndpointParameterInstructions;
+    /**
+     * @public
+     */
+    constructor(input: ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput);
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    resolveMiddleware(clientStack: MiddlewareStack<ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes>, configuration: VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig, options?: __HttpHandlerOptions): Handler<ListPolicyTemplatesCommandInput, ListPolicyTemplatesCommandOutput>;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private serialize;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private deserialize;
+}

package/dist-types/commands/PutSchemaCommand.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+import { EndpointParameterInstructions } from "@aws-sdk/middleware-endpoint";
+import { Command as $Command } from "@aws-sdk/smithy-client";
+import { Handler, HttpHandlerOptions as __HttpHandlerOptions, MetadataBearer as __MetadataBearer, MiddlewareStack } from "@aws-sdk/types";
+import { PutSchemaInput, PutSchemaOutput } from "../models/models_0";
+import { ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig } from "../VerifiedPermissionsClient";
+/**
+ * @public
+ */
+export { __MetadataBearer, $Command };
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The input for {@link PutSchemaCommand}.
+ */
+export interface PutSchemaCommandInput extends PutSchemaInput {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The output of {@link PutSchemaCommand}.
+ */
+export interface PutSchemaCommandOutput extends PutSchemaOutput, __MetadataBearer {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ * <p>Creates or updates the policy schema in the specified policy store. The schema is used to
+ *             validate any Cedar policies and policy templates submitted to the policy store. Any changes to the schema
+ *             validate only policies and templates submitted after the schema change. Existing
+ *             policies and templates are not re-evaluated against the changed schema. If you later
+ *             update a policy, then it is evaluated against the new schema at that time.</p>
+ * @example
+ * Use a bare-bones client and the command you need to make an API call.
+ * ```javascript
+ * import { VerifiedPermissionsClient, PutSchemaCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"; // ES Modules import
+ * // const { VerifiedPermissionsClient, PutSchemaCommand } = require("@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"); // CommonJS import
+ * const client = new VerifiedPermissionsClient(config);
+ * const input = { // PutSchemaInput
+ *   policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ *   definition: { // SchemaDefinition Union: only one key present
+ *     cedarJson: "STRING_VALUE",
+ *   },
+ * };
+ * const command = new PutSchemaCommand(input);
+ * const response = await client.send(command);
+ * // { // PutSchemaOutput
+ * //   policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ * //   namespaces: [ // NamespaceList // required
+ * //     "STRING_VALUE",
+ * //   ],
+ * //   createdDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * //   lastUpdatedDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * // };
+ *
+ * ```
+ *
+ * @param PutSchemaCommandInput - {@link PutSchemaCommandInput}
+ * @returns {@link PutSchemaCommandOutput}
+ * @see {@link PutSchemaCommandInput} for command's `input` shape.
+ * @see {@link PutSchemaCommandOutput} for command's `response` shape.
+ * @see {@link VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig | config} for VerifiedPermissionsClient's `config` shape.
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ConflictException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because another request to modify a resource occurred at the
+ *             same.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ResourceNotFoundException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it references a resource that doesn't exist.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ServiceQuotaExceededException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it would cause a service quota to be exceeded.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link AccessDeniedException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>You don't have sufficient access to perform this action.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link InternalServerException} (server fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because of an internal error. Try your request again later</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ThrottlingException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it exceeded a throttling quota.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ValidationException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because one or more input parameters don't satisfy their constraint
+ *             requirements. The output is provided as a list of fields and a reason for each field that
+ *             isn't valid.</p>
+ *          <p>The possible reasons include the following:</p>
+ *          <ul>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedEntityType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an entity type that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedActionId</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action id that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>InvalidActionApplication</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action that, according to the schema, doesn't support
+ *                     the specified principal and resource.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnexpectedType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy included an operand that isn't a valid type for the specified
+ *                     operation.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>IncompatibleTypes</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The types of elements included in a <code>set</code>, or the types of
+ *                     expressions used in an <code>if...then...else</code> clause aren't compatible in
+ *                     this context.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>MissingAttribute</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that isn't
+ *                     specified in the schema. Test for the existence of the attribute first before
+ *                     attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnsafeOptionalAttributeAccess</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that is optional
+ *                     and isn't guaranteed to be present. Test for the existence of the attribute
+ *                     first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the
+ *                         <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>ImpossiblePolicy</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar has determined that a policy condition always evaluates to false. If
+ *                     the policy is always false, it can never apply to any query, and so it can never
+ *                     affect an authorization decision.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>WrongNumberArguments</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy references an extension type with the wrong number of
+ *                     arguments.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>FunctionArgumentValidationError</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar couldn't parse the argument passed to an extension type. For example,
+ *                     a string that is to be parsed as an IPv4 address can contain only digits and the
+ *                     period character.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *          </ul>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link VerifiedPermissionsServiceException}
+ * <p>Base exception class for all service exceptions from VerifiedPermissions service.</p>
+ *
+ */
+export declare class PutSchemaCommand extends $Command<PutSchemaCommandInput, PutSchemaCommandOutput, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig> {
+    readonly input: PutSchemaCommandInput;
+    static getEndpointParameterInstructions(): EndpointParameterInstructions;
+    /**
+     * @public
+     */
+    constructor(input: PutSchemaCommandInput);
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    resolveMiddleware(clientStack: MiddlewareStack<ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes>, configuration: VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig, options?: __HttpHandlerOptions): Handler<PutSchemaCommandInput, PutSchemaCommandOutput>;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private serialize;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private deserialize;
+}

package/dist-types/commands/UpdateIdentitySourceCommand.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+import { EndpointParameterInstructions } from "@aws-sdk/middleware-endpoint";
+import { Command as $Command } from "@aws-sdk/smithy-client";
+import { Handler, HttpHandlerOptions as __HttpHandlerOptions, MetadataBearer as __MetadataBearer, MiddlewareStack } from "@aws-sdk/types";
+import { UpdateIdentitySourceInput, UpdateIdentitySourceOutput } from "../models/models_0";
+import { ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig } from "../VerifiedPermissionsClient";
+/**
+ * @public
+ */
+export { __MetadataBearer, $Command };
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The input for {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommand}.
+ */
+export interface UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput extends UpdateIdentitySourceInput {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ *
+ * The output of {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommand}.
+ */
+export interface UpdateIdentitySourceCommandOutput extends UpdateIdentitySourceOutput, __MetadataBearer {
+}
+/**
+ * @public
+ * <p>Updates the specified identity source to use a new identity provider (IdP) source, or to change
+ *             the mapping of identities from the IdP to a different principal entity type.</p>
+ * @example
+ * Use a bare-bones client and the command you need to make an API call.
+ * ```javascript
+ * import { VerifiedPermissionsClient, UpdateIdentitySourceCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"; // ES Modules import
+ * // const { VerifiedPermissionsClient, UpdateIdentitySourceCommand } = require("@aws-sdk/client-verifiedpermissions"); // CommonJS import
+ * const client = new VerifiedPermissionsClient(config);
+ * const input = { // UpdateIdentitySourceInput
+ *   policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ *   identitySourceId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ *   updateConfiguration: { // UpdateConfiguration Union: only one key present
+ *     cognitoUserPoolConfiguration: { // UpdateCognitoUserPoolConfiguration
+ *       userPoolArn: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ *       clientIds: [ // ClientIds
+ *         "STRING_VALUE",
+ *       ],
+ *     },
+ *   },
+ *   principalEntityType: "STRING_VALUE",
+ * };
+ * const command = new UpdateIdentitySourceCommand(input);
+ * const response = await client.send(command);
+ * // { // UpdateIdentitySourceOutput
+ * //   createdDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * //   identitySourceId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ * //   lastUpdatedDate: new Date("TIMESTAMP"), // required
+ * //   policyStoreId: "STRING_VALUE", // required
+ * // };
+ *
+ * ```
+ *
+ * @param UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput - {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput}
+ * @returns {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommandOutput}
+ * @see {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput} for command's `input` shape.
+ * @see {@link UpdateIdentitySourceCommandOutput} for command's `response` shape.
+ * @see {@link VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig | config} for VerifiedPermissionsClient's `config` shape.
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ConflictException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because another request to modify a resource occurred at the
+ *             same.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ResourceNotFoundException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it references a resource that doesn't exist.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link AccessDeniedException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>You don't have sufficient access to perform this action.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link InternalServerException} (server fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because of an internal error. Try your request again later</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ThrottlingException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because it exceeded a throttling quota.</p>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link ValidationException} (client fault)
+ *  <p>The request failed because one or more input parameters don't satisfy their constraint
+ *             requirements. The output is provided as a list of fields and a reason for each field that
+ *             isn't valid.</p>
+ *          <p>The possible reasons include the following:</p>
+ *          <ul>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedEntityType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an entity type that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnrecognizedActionId</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action id that isn't found in the schema.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>InvalidActionApplication</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy includes an action that, according to the schema, doesn't support
+ *                     the specified principal and resource.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnexpectedType</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy included an operand that isn't a valid type for the specified
+ *                     operation.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>IncompatibleTypes</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The types of elements included in a <code>set</code>, or the types of
+ *                     expressions used in an <code>if...then...else</code> clause aren't compatible in
+ *                     this context.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>MissingAttribute</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that isn't
+ *                     specified in the schema. Test for the existence of the attribute first before
+ *                     attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>UnsafeOptionalAttributeAccess</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that is optional
+ *                     and isn't guaranteed to be present. Test for the existence of the attribute
+ *                     first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the
+ *                         <a href="docs.cedarpolicy.comsyntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the
+ *                         <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>ImpossiblePolicy</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar has determined that a policy condition always evaluates to false. If
+ *                     the policy is always false, it can never apply to any query, and so it can never
+ *                     affect an authorization decision.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>WrongNumberArguments</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>The policy references an extension type with the wrong number of
+ *                     arguments.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *             <li>
+ *                <p>
+ *                   <b>FunctionArgumentValidationError</b>
+ *                </p>
+ *                <p>Cedar couldn't parse the argument passed to an extension type. For example,
+ *                     a string that is to be parsed as an IPv4 address can contain only digits and the
+ *                     period character.</p>
+ *             </li>
+ *          </ul>
+ *
+ * @throws {@link VerifiedPermissionsServiceException}
+ * <p>Base exception class for all service exceptions from VerifiedPermissions service.</p>
+ *
+ */
+export declare class UpdateIdentitySourceCommand extends $Command<UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput, UpdateIdentitySourceCommandOutput, VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig> {
+    readonly input: UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput;
+    static getEndpointParameterInstructions(): EndpointParameterInstructions;
+    /**
+     * @public
+     */
+    constructor(input: UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput);
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    resolveMiddleware(clientStack: MiddlewareStack<ServiceInputTypes, ServiceOutputTypes>, configuration: VerifiedPermissionsClientResolvedConfig, options?: __HttpHandlerOptions): Handler<UpdateIdentitySourceCommandInput, UpdateIdentitySourceCommandOutput>;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private serialize;
+    /**
+     * @internal
+     */
+    private deserialize;
+}