@aws-sdk/client-batch 3.1070.0 → 3.1072.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/dist-cjs/index.js CHANGED
@@ -745,7 +745,9 @@ const AssignPublicIp = {
745
745
  const CRAllocationStrategy = {
746
746
  BEST_FIT: "BEST_FIT",
747
747
  BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE",
748
+ BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED",
748
749
  SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
750
+ SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
749
751
  SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
750
752
  };
751
753
  const UserdataType = {
@@ -916,7 +918,9 @@ const JobDefinitionType = {
916
918
  };
917
919
  const CRUpdateAllocationStrategy = {
918
920
  BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE",
921
+ BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED",
919
922
  SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
923
+ SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
920
924
  SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
921
925
  };
922
926
 
@@ -753,8 +753,8 @@ const ComputeEnvironmentOrder$ = [3, n0, _CEO,
753
753
  exports.ComputeEnvironmentOrder$ = ComputeEnvironmentOrder$;
754
754
  const ComputeResource$ = [3, n0, _CR,
755
755
  0,
756
- [_ty, _mCa, _su, _aS, _mCi, _dC, _iT, _iI, _sGI, _eKP, _iR, _t, _pG, _bP, _sIFR, _lT, _eCc, _sP],
757
- [0, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 1, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 64 | 0, 0, 0, 128 | 0, 0, 1, 0, () => LaunchTemplateSpecification$, () => Ec2ConfigurationList, () => ComputeScalingPolicy$], 3
756
+ [_ty, _mCa, _aS, _mCi, _dC, _iT, _iI, _su, _sGI, _eKP, _iR, _t, _pG, _bP, _sIFR, _lT, _eCc, _sP],
757
+ [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 64 | 0, 64 | 0, 0, 0, 128 | 0, 0, 1, 0, () => LaunchTemplateSpecification$, () => Ec2ConfigurationList, () => ComputeScalingPolicy$], 2
758
758
  ];
759
759
  exports.ComputeResource$ = ComputeResource$;
760
760
  const ComputeResourceUpdate$ = [3, n0, _CRU,
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ export const AssignPublicIp = {
9
9
  export const CRAllocationStrategy = {
10
10
  BEST_FIT: "BEST_FIT",
11
11
  BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE",
12
+ BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED",
12
13
  SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
14
+ SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
13
15
  SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
14
16
  };
15
17
  export const UserdataType = {
@@ -180,6 +182,8 @@ export const JobDefinitionType = {
180
182
  };
181
183
  export const CRUpdateAllocationStrategy = {
182
184
  BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE",
185
+ BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED",
183
186
  SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
187
+ SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
184
188
  SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
185
189
  };
@@ -738,8 +738,8 @@ export var ComputeEnvironmentOrder$ = [3, n0, _CEO,
738
738
  ];
739
739
  export var ComputeResource$ = [3, n0, _CR,
740
740
  0,
741
- [_ty, _mCa, _su, _aS, _mCi, _dC, _iT, _iI, _sGI, _eKP, _iR, _t, _pG, _bP, _sIFR, _lT, _eCc, _sP],
742
- [0, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 1, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 64 | 0, 0, 0, 128 | 0, 0, 1, 0, () => LaunchTemplateSpecification$, () => Ec2ConfigurationList, () => ComputeScalingPolicy$], 3
741
+ [_ty, _mCa, _aS, _mCi, _dC, _iT, _iI, _su, _sGI, _eKP, _iR, _t, _pG, _bP, _sIFR, _lT, _eCc, _sP],
742
+ [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 64 | 0, 0, 64 | 0, 64 | 0, 0, 0, 128 | 0, 0, 1, 0, () => LaunchTemplateSpecification$, () => Ec2ConfigurationList, () => ComputeScalingPolicy$], 2
743
743
  ];
744
744
  export var ComputeResourceUpdate$ = [3, n0, _CRU,
745
745
  0,
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ declare const CreateComputeEnvironmentCommand_base: {
69
69
  * unmanagedvCpus: Number("int"),
70
70
  * computeResources: { // ComputeResource
71
71
  * type: "EC2" || "SPOT" || "FARGATE" || "FARGATE_SPOT", // required
72
- * allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
72
+ * allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
73
73
  * minvCpus: Number("int"),
74
74
  * maxvCpus: Number("int"), // required
75
75
  * desiredvCpus: Number("int"),
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ declare const CreateComputeEnvironmentCommand_base: {
77
77
  * "STRING_VALUE",
78
78
  * ],
79
79
  * imageId: "STRING_VALUE",
80
- * subnets: [ // required
80
+ * subnets: [
81
81
  * "STRING_VALUE",
82
82
  * ],
83
83
  * securityGroupIds: [
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ declare const DescribeComputeEnvironmentsCommand_base: {
66
66
  * // statusReason: "STRING_VALUE",
67
67
  * // computeResources: { // ComputeResource
68
68
  * // type: "EC2" || "SPOT" || "FARGATE" || "FARGATE_SPOT", // required
69
- * // allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
69
+ * // allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
70
70
  * // minvCpus: Number("int"),
71
71
  * // maxvCpus: Number("int"), // required
72
72
  * // desiredvCpus: Number("int"),
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ declare const DescribeComputeEnvironmentsCommand_base: {
74
74
  * // "STRING_VALUE",
75
75
  * // ],
76
76
  * // imageId: "STRING_VALUE",
77
- * // subnets: [ // required
77
+ * // subnets: [
78
78
  * // "STRING_VALUE",
79
79
  * // ],
80
80
  * // securityGroupIds: [
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ declare const UpdateComputeEnvironmentCommand_base: {
52
52
  * securityGroupIds: [
53
53
  * "STRING_VALUE",
54
54
  * ],
55
- * allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED",
55
+ * allocationStrategy: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE" || "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED" || "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED",
56
56
  * instanceTypes: [
57
57
  * "STRING_VALUE",
58
58
  * ],
@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ export type AssignPublicIp = (typeof AssignPublicIp)[keyof typeof AssignPublicIp
29
29
  export declare const CRAllocationStrategy: {
30
30
  readonly BEST_FIT: "BEST_FIT";
31
31
  readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE";
32
+ readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED";
32
33
  readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
34
+ readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED";
33
35
  readonly SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
34
36
  };
35
37
  /**
@@ -472,7 +474,9 @@ export type JobDefinitionType = (typeof JobDefinitionType)[keyof typeof JobDefin
472
474
  */
473
475
  export declare const CRUpdateAllocationStrategy: {
474
476
  readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE";
477
+ readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED";
475
478
  readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
479
+ readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED";
476
480
  readonly SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
477
481
  };
478
482
  /**
@@ -654,6 +654,27 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
654
654
  * additional instances of the previously selected instance types aren't available, Batch
655
655
  * selects new instance types.</p>
656
656
  * </dd>
657
+ * <dt>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED</dt>
658
+ * <dd>
659
+ * <important>
660
+ * <p>This is an advanced allocation strategy only for customers who want to control which
661
+ * instance types are preferred during scaling.</p>
662
+ * <p>Placing large instance types at the top of the list may result in <b>over-provisioning</b> for
663
+ * small jobs. Placing small instance types at the top may cause the compute environment to
664
+ * reach Amazon EC2 instance count limits before reaching <code>maxvCpus</code>.</p>
665
+ * </important>
666
+ * <p>Batch selects instance types in the order they appear in the
667
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code> list. When an instance family is specified, sizes within that
668
+ * family are expanded using <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code> logic—preferring sizes that
669
+ * best fit the jobs, with larger sizes as fallback. Instance types that cannot meet the resource
670
+ * requirements of the jobs are skipped. This strategy is only available for On-Demand Instance
671
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources.</p>
672
+ * <p>If an instance family and an explicit instance type from that family both appear in
673
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code>, the explicit type takes its listed position and is excluded from
674
+ * the family expansion. For example, in <code>["m7a.4xlarge", "m7a", "m6a"]</code>,
675
+ * <code>m7a.4xlarge</code> is always placed first and is excluded from the <code>m7a</code>
676
+ * family expansion.</p>
677
+ * </dd>
657
678
  * <dt>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</dt>
658
679
  * <dd>
659
680
  * <p>Batch selects one or more instance types that are large enough to meet the requirements
@@ -668,12 +689,30 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
668
689
  * possible price. This allocation strategy is only available for Spot Instance compute
669
690
  * resources.</p>
670
691
  * </dd>
692
+ * <dt>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED</dt>
693
+ * <dd>
694
+ * <important>
695
+ * <p>This is an advanced allocation strategy for customers who want to influence instance
696
+ * type selection during scaling. This strategy optimizes for <b>capacity
697
+ * first</b>, and honors instance type priorities on a best-effort basis (priorities are
698
+ * honored when they do not significantly reduce available Spot capacity).</p>
699
+ * <p>Placing large instance types at the top of the list may result in <b>over-provisioning</b> for
700
+ * small jobs. Placing small instance types at the top may cause the compute environment to
701
+ * reach Amazon EC2 instance count limits before reaching <code>maxvCpus</code>.</p>
702
+ * </important>
703
+ * <p>Batch selects instance types in the order they appear in the
704
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code> list, but <b>optimizes for capacity
705
+ * first</b>. The customer-defined priority is honored on a best-effort basis. When Spot
706
+ * Instance capacity pools are similarly available, priority order is respected. When capacity is
707
+ * constrained, Batch selects from the most available pools regardless of priority to minimize
708
+ * the likelihood of Spot Instance interruptions. This strategy is only available for Spot
709
+ * Instance compute resources.</p>
710
+ * </dd>
671
711
  * </dl>
672
- * <p>With <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code>,<code>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> and
673
- * <code>SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> (recommended) strategies using On-Demand or Spot
674
- * Instances, and the <code>BEST_FIT</code> strategy using Spot Instances, Batch might need to
675
- * exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never
676
- * exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than a single instance.</p>
712
+ * <p>With any allocation strategy except <code>BEST_FIT</code> using On-Demand
713
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources, Batch might need to exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your
714
+ * capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than
715
+ * a single instance.</p>
677
716
  * @public
678
717
  */
679
718
  allocationStrategy?: CRAllocationStrategy | undefined;
@@ -689,11 +728,10 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
689
728
  /**
690
729
  * <p>The maximum number of vCPUs that a compute environment can support.</p>
691
730
  * <note>
692
- * <p>With <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code>,<code>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> and
693
- * <code>SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> (recommended) strategies using On-Demand or Spot Instances,
694
- * and the <code>BEST_FIT</code> strategy using Spot Instances, Batch might need to exceed
695
- * <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds
696
- * <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than a single instance.</p>
731
+ * <p>With any allocation strategy except <code>BEST_FIT</code> using On-Demand
732
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources, Batch might need to exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your
733
+ * capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than
734
+ * a single instance.</p>
697
735
  * </note>
698
736
  * @public
699
737
  */
@@ -781,7 +819,9 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
781
819
  * <p>The VPC subnets where the compute resources are launched. These subnets must be within the
782
820
  * same VPC. Fargate compute resources can contain up to 16 subnets. For more information, see
783
821
  * <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/VPC_Subnets.html">VPCs and subnets</a>
784
- * in the <i>Amazon VPC User Guide</i>.</p>
822
+ * in the <i>Amazon VPC User Guide</i>. This parameter is required for compute
823
+ * environments using <code>EC2</code>, <code>SPOT</code>, <code>FARGATE</code>, or
824
+ * <code>FARGATE_SPOT</code> compute resources.</p>
785
825
  * <note>
786
826
  * <p>Batch on Amazon EC2 and Batch on Amazon EKS support Local Zones. For more information, see <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using-regions-availability-zones.html#concepts-local-zones"> Local
787
827
  * Zones</a> in the <i>Amazon EC2 User Guide for Linux Instances</i>, <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eks/latest/userguide/local-zones.html">Amazon EKS and Amazon Web Services Local
@@ -792,7 +832,7 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
792
832
  * </note>
793
833
  * @public
794
834
  */
795
- subnets: string[] | undefined;
835
+ subnets?: string[] | undefined;
796
836
  /**
797
837
  * <p>The Amazon EC2 security groups that are associated with instances launched in the compute
798
838
  * environment. One or more security groups must be specified, either in
@@ -8310,11 +8350,10 @@ export interface ComputeResourceUpdate {
8310
8350
  /**
8311
8351
  * <p>The maximum number of Amazon EC2 vCPUs that an environment can reach.</p>
8312
8352
  * <note>
8313
- * <p>With <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code>,<code>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> and
8314
- * <code>SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> (recommended) strategies using On-Demand or Spot
8315
- * Instances, and the <code>BEST_FIT</code> strategy using Spot Instances, Batch might need to
8316
- * exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never
8317
- * exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than a single instance.</p>
8353
+ * <p>With any allocation strategy except <code>BEST_FIT</code> using On-Demand
8354
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources, Batch might need to exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your
8355
+ * capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than
8356
+ * a single instance.</p>
8318
8357
  * </note>
8319
8358
  * @public
8320
8359
  */
@@ -8392,6 +8431,27 @@ export interface ComputeResourceUpdate {
8392
8431
  * additional instances of the previously selected instance types aren't available, Batch
8393
8432
  * selects new instance types.</p>
8394
8433
  * </dd>
8434
+ * <dt>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED</dt>
8435
+ * <dd>
8436
+ * <important>
8437
+ * <p>This is an advanced allocation strategy only for customers who want to control which
8438
+ * instance types are preferred during scaling.</p>
8439
+ * <p>Placing large instance types at the top of the list may result in <b>over-provisioning</b> for
8440
+ * small jobs. Placing small instance types at the top may cause the compute environment to
8441
+ * reach Amazon EC2 instance count limits before reaching <code>maxvCpus</code>.</p>
8442
+ * </important>
8443
+ * <p>Batch selects instance types in the order they appear in the
8444
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code> list. When an instance family is specified, sizes within that
8445
+ * family are expanded using <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code> logic—preferring sizes that
8446
+ * best fit the jobs, with larger sizes as fallback. Instance types that cannot meet the resource
8447
+ * requirements of the jobs are skipped. This strategy is only available for On-Demand Instance
8448
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources.</p>
8449
+ * <p>If an instance family and an explicit instance type from that family both appear in
8450
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code>, the explicit type takes its listed position and is excluded from
8451
+ * the family expansion. For example, in <code>["m7a.4xlarge", "m7a", "m6a"]</code>,
8452
+ * <code>m7a.4xlarge</code> is always placed first and is excluded from the <code>m7a</code>
8453
+ * family expansion.</p>
8454
+ * </dd>
8395
8455
  * <dt>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</dt>
8396
8456
  * <dd>
8397
8457
  * <p>Batch selects one or more instance types that are large enough to meet the requirements
@@ -8406,12 +8466,30 @@ export interface ComputeResourceUpdate {
8406
8466
  * possible price. This allocation strategy is only available for Spot Instance compute
8407
8467
  * resources.</p>
8408
8468
  * </dd>
8469
+ * <dt>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED</dt>
8470
+ * <dd>
8471
+ * <important>
8472
+ * <p>This is an advanced allocation strategy for customers who want to influence instance
8473
+ * type selection during scaling. This strategy optimizes for <b>capacity
8474
+ * first</b>, and honors instance type priorities on a best-effort basis (priorities are
8475
+ * honored when they do not significantly reduce available Spot capacity).</p>
8476
+ * <p>Placing large instance types at the top of the list may result in <b>over-provisioning</b> for
8477
+ * small jobs. Placing small instance types at the top may cause the compute environment to
8478
+ * reach Amazon EC2 instance count limits before reaching <code>maxvCpus</code>.</p>
8479
+ * </important>
8480
+ * <p>Batch selects instance types in the order they appear in the
8481
+ * <code>instanceTypes</code> list, but <b>optimizes for capacity
8482
+ * first</b>. The customer-defined priority is honored on a best-effort basis. When Spot
8483
+ * Instance capacity pools are similarly available, priority order is respected. When capacity is
8484
+ * constrained, Batch selects from the most available pools regardless of priority to minimize
8485
+ * the likelihood of Spot Instance interruptions. This strategy is only available for Spot
8486
+ * Instance compute resources.</p>
8487
+ * </dd>
8409
8488
  * </dl>
8410
- * <p>With <code>BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE</code>,<code>SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> and
8411
- * <code>SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED</code> (recommended) strategies using On-Demand or Spot Instances,
8412
- * and the <code>BEST_FIT</code> strategy using Spot Instances, Batch might need to exceed
8413
- * <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds
8414
- * <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than a single instance.</p>
8489
+ * <p>With any allocation strategy except <code>BEST_FIT</code> using On-Demand
8490
+ * (<code>EC2</code>) compute resources, Batch might need to exceed <code>maxvCpus</code> to meet your
8491
+ * capacity requirements. In this event, Batch never exceeds <code>maxvCpus</code> by more than
8492
+ * a single instance.</p>
8415
8493
  * @public
8416
8494
  */
8417
8495
  allocationStrategy?: CRUpdateAllocationStrategy | undefined;
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ export type AssignPublicIp =
13
13
  export declare const CRAllocationStrategy: {
14
14
  readonly BEST_FIT: "BEST_FIT";
15
15
  readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE";
16
+ readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED";
16
17
  readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
18
+ readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED";
17
19
  readonly SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
18
20
  };
19
21
  export type CRAllocationStrategy =
@@ -240,7 +242,9 @@ export type JobDefinitionType =
240
242
  (typeof JobDefinitionType)[keyof typeof JobDefinitionType];
241
243
  export declare const CRUpdateAllocationStrategy: {
242
244
  readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE";
245
+ readonly BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED: "BEST_FIT_PROGRESSIVE_ORDERED";
243
246
  readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
247
+ readonly SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED: "SPOT_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED_PRIORITIZED";
244
248
  readonly SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED: "SPOT_PRICE_CAPACITY_OPTIMIZED";
245
249
  };
246
250
  export type CRUpdateAllocationStrategy =
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ export interface ComputeResource {
120
120
  desiredvCpus?: number | undefined;
121
121
  instanceTypes?: string[] | undefined;
122
122
  imageId?: string | undefined;
123
- subnets: string[] | undefined;
123
+ subnets?: string[] | undefined;
124
124
  securityGroupIds?: string[] | undefined;
125
125
  ec2KeyPair?: string | undefined;
126
126
  instanceRole?: string | undefined;
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@aws-sdk/client-batch",
3
3
  "description": "AWS SDK for JavaScript Batch Client for Node.js, Browser and React Native",
4
- "version": "3.1070.0",
4
+ "version": "3.1072.0",
5
5
  "scripts": {
6
6
  "build": "concurrently 'yarn:build:types' 'yarn:build:es' && yarn build:cjs",
7
7
  "build:cjs": "node ../../scripts/compilation/inline",
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
21
21
  "dependencies": {
22
22
  "@aws-crypto/sha256-browser": "5.2.0",
23
23
  "@aws-crypto/sha256-js": "5.2.0",
24
- "@aws-sdk/core": "^3.974.21",
25
- "@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node": "^3.972.56",
24
+ "@aws-sdk/core": "^3.974.22",
25
+ "@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node": "^3.972.57",
26
26
  "@aws-sdk/types": "^3.973.13",
27
27
  "@smithy/core": "^3.24.6",
28
28
  "@smithy/fetch-http-handler": "^5.4.6",