@autohq/cli 0.1.312 → 0.1.314

package/dist/agent-bridge.js

@@ -19722,16 +19722,16 @@ var RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeWireSchema = external_exports.object({
   // ground truth. The persisting side settles exactly these turns; absent
   // (older runtimes, non-command turns) it falls back to cursor attribution.
   consumedCommandIds: external_exports.array(SessionCommandIdSchema).optional()
-}).strict();
+});
 var LegacyRuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeSchema = RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeWireSchema.omit({ turnStatus: true }).extend({
   sessionStatusAfter: external_exports.enum(["awaiting", "failed"])
-}).strict().transform(({ sessionStatusAfter, ...entry }) => ({
+}).transform(({ sessionStatusAfter, ...entry }) => ({
   ...entry,
   turnStatus: legacyRuntimeTurnStatus(entry, sessionStatusAfter)
 }));
 var RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeSchema = external_exports.union([
-  RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeWireSchema,
-  LegacyRuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeSchema
+  LegacyRuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeSchema,
+  RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeWireSchema
 ]);
 var RuntimeBridgeOutputDeltaEnvelopeSchema = external_exports.object({
   type: external_exports.literal("conversation.delta"),
@@ -19786,7 +19786,7 @@ var RuntimeBridgeOutputUiMessageCompletedEnvelopeSchema = external_exports.objec
   consumedCommandIds: external_exports.array(SessionCommandIdSchema).optional(),
   createdAt: external_exports.string().datetime(),
   completedAt: external_exports.string().datetime().nullable()
-}).strict();
+});
 var RuntimeBridgeOutputEnvelopeSchema = external_exports.union([
   RuntimeBridgeOutputEntryEnvelopeSchema,
   RuntimeBridgeOutputDeltaEnvelopeSchema,
@@ -23431,7 +23431,7 @@ Object.assign(lookup, {
 // package.json
 var package_default = {
   name: "@autohq/cli",
-  version: "0.1.312",
+  version: "0.1.314",
   license: "SEE LICENSE IN README.md",
   publishConfig: {
     access: "public"
@@ -23517,6 +23517,13 @@ var AgentBridgeTerminalAuthError = class extends Error {
     this.name = "AgentBridgeTerminalAuthError";
   }
 };
+var AGENT_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS = 1e4;
+var AgentBridgeOutputAckTimeoutError = class extends Error {
+  constructor(message) {
+    super(message);
+    this.name = "AgentBridgeOutputAckTimeoutError";
+  }
+};
 async function runAgentBridgeSocket(options) {
   const socket = lookup(`${options.bridgeUrl}${RUNTIME_BRIDGE_NAMESPACE}`, {
     auth: {
@@ -23569,6 +23576,13 @@ async function runAgentBridgeSocket(options) {
         onBootstrap: options.onBootstrap,
         createHandler: (bootstrap) => options.createHandler({
           emitOutput: (output) => emitOutputWithAck(socket, output, options.runtimeLogger),
+          cycleSocket: () => {
+            options.writeOutput?.(
+              "agent_bridge_socket_cycle reason=output_ack_retries_exhausted"
+            );
+            socket.disconnect();
+            socket.connect();
+          },
           bootstrap,
           outputSeqStart: bootstrap.outputSeqStart,
           runtimeLogger: options.runtimeLogger,
@@ -23766,7 +23780,7 @@ function emitOutputWithAck(socket, output, runtimeLogger) {
     outputLogContext(output, socket.id)
   );
   return new Promise((resolve2, reject) => {
-    socket.timeout(5e3).emit(
+    socket.timeout(AGENT_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS).emit(
       RUNTIME_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_EVENT,
       output,
       (error51, rawAck) => {
@@ -23776,7 +23790,7 @@ function emitOutputWithAck(socket, output, runtimeLogger) {
             duration_ms: Date.now() - startedAt,
             error: error51.message
           });
-          reject(error51);
+          reject(new AgentBridgeOutputAckTimeoutError(error51.message));
           return;
         }
         const ack = RuntimeBridgeOutputAckSchema.safeParse(rawAck);
@@ -29491,6 +29505,23 @@ triggers:
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.2.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/pr-review-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./pr-review.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the code review agent for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  Read the repository\'s convention docs (README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, AGENTS.md,\n  CLAUDE.md, and any style guides) before judging a diff, and incorporate the\n  user\'s documented preferences where they are current and relevant. Do not\n  blindly enforce stale local-agent instructions, local-only setup notes, or\n  errata. Confirm important preferences against the current repo shape and CI.\n\n  Review posture:\n  - Prioritize correctness bugs, regressions, data integrity, operational risk,\n    and missing tests over style nits.\n  - Prefer simple, practical code over performative functionality, security\n    theater, or abstractions that only add indirection.\n  - Prefer established local patterns over home-rolled machinery.\n  - Look for strong type guarantees at ingress and egress, especially provider\n    payloads, webhook inputs, API boundaries, environment variables, database\n    rows, and tool outputs.\n  - Look for real tests, especially at provider boundaries. Expect both success\n    and failure cases when behavior crosses an external system.\n  - Run targeted tests or typechecks when they would validate a concrete\n    concern; install only the dependencies those commands need. Keep\n    commands scoped to the PR.\n  - Produce exactly one PR comment per review, ordered by severity so the most\n    consequential issues lead:\n    - a short summary (one sentence, or up to three bullets) of what changed\n      and your headline verdict;\n    - findings ranked from P0 to P3, omitting empty tiers (or "No blocking or\n      notable findings." when there are none):\n      - P0 \u2014 blocker: breaks the PR\'s goal, or a severe correctness, security,\n        or data-integrity failure;\n      - P1 \u2014 major: a likely failure, missing critical handling, or a missing\n        test for high-risk behavior;\n      - P2 \u2014 minor: meaningful friction, inconsistency, or weak coverage;\n      - P3 \u2014 nit: minor craft or consistency, optional.\n      Give each finding its location, the impact, how you verified it (the\n      targeted test or typecheck you ran, or "read-only"), and the smallest\n      fix;\n    - a merge recommendation of "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down": thumbs-down on\n      any unresolved P0 or P1, thumbs-down on an unresolved P2 unless the PR\n      documents why it is acceptable, and never on a P3 alone.\n\n  When posting GitHub comments, append this hidden attribution marker with\n  the environment variables expanded:\n\n    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Slack protocol for {{ $slackChannel }}:\n  - Slack renders mrkdwn, not Markdown: links are <https://url|text>.\n  - One top-level message per PR, shaped as\n    "<pr-url|PR #N>: <pr title>". Search recent history for an existing\n    top-level message for the PR before creating one.\n  - Post each verdict as a threaded reply: the recommendation, the findings\n    that gate it (unresolved P0/P1, plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down) or\n    "No blocking issues found.", a link to the PR comment, and the reviewed\n    commit SHA.\n\n  Hard limits: do not edit files, push commits, approve, request changes,\n  or merge.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Review GitHub pull request #{{github.pullRequest.number}} in\n  {{github.repository.fullName}}.\n\n  Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing anything else.\n  Then call mcp__auto__auto_bind for this PR with type\n  `github.pull_request`, repository `{{github.repository.fullName}}`, and\n  pull request number `{{github.pullRequest.number}}` so later PR comments and\n  reviews route back to this session.\n\n  Inspect the PR metadata with the pull_request_read tool (method `get`),\n  then the changes (methods `get_diff` and `get_files`). Record the head\n  commit SHA you reviewed.\n\n  The local checkout is a shallow checkout of the PR head only. Fetch other\n  refs explicitly if you need them.\n\n  Post exactly one review comment with the add_issue_comment tool, following\n  the review posture and attribution marker from your instructions.\n\n  Then conclude the check: checks.success for a thumbs-up recommendation,\n  checks.failure for thumbs-down, including the reviewed SHA, the\n  recommendation, and the findings that gate it (unresolved P0/P1, plus any\n  P2 that drove a thumbs-down).\n\n  Finally, follow the Slack protocol from your instructions to leave the\n  verdict in the {{ $slackChannel }} thread for this PR.\ntools:\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connection\n      provider: slack\n      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\ntriggers:\n  - name: mention\n    event: chat.message.mentioned\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:\n\n      {{message.text}}\n\n      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n\n      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user clearly links or names\n      a PR, review it. If required context is missing, ask for the PR. Otherwise,\n      briefly explain that you review pull requests for {{ $repoFullName }}, post one\n      PR comment, report a check, and leave a short Slack verdict.\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/pr-review.yaml",
+          content: 'name: pr-review\nidentity:\n  displayName: PR Review\n  username: pr-review\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/pr-reviewer.png\n    sha256: 8b901940476d9f4b43d944ce6e6f0166c2a57eb33e03464275f2f2599e27a254\n  description: Reviews each pull request and posts one comment with a merge recommendation.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the code review agent for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  Read the repository\'s convention docs (README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, AGENTS.md,\n  CLAUDE.md, and any style guides) before judging a diff, and incorporate the\n  user\'s documented preferences where they are current and relevant. Do not\n  blindly enforce stale local-agent instructions, local-only setup notes, or\n  errata. Confirm important preferences against the current repo shape and CI.\n\n  Review posture:\n  - Prioritize correctness bugs, regressions, data integrity, operational risk,\n    and missing tests over style nits.\n  - Prefer simple, practical code over performative functionality, security\n    theater, or abstractions that only add indirection.\n  - Prefer established local patterns over home-rolled machinery.\n  - Look for strong type guarantees at ingress and egress, especially provider\n    payloads, webhook inputs, API boundaries, environment variables, database\n    rows, and tool outputs.\n  - Look for real tests, especially at provider boundaries. Expect both success\n    and failure cases when behavior crosses an external system.\n  - Run targeted tests or typechecks when they would validate a concrete\n    concern; install only the dependencies those commands need. Keep\n    commands scoped to the PR.\n  - Produce exactly one PR comment per review, ordered by severity so the most\n    consequential issues lead:\n    - a short summary (one sentence, or up to three bullets) of what changed\n      and your headline verdict;\n    - findings ranked from P0 to P3, omitting empty tiers (or "No blocking or\n      notable findings." when there are none):\n      - P0 \u2014 blocker: breaks the PR\'s goal, or a severe correctness, security,\n        or data-integrity failure;\n      - P1 \u2014 major: a likely failure, missing critical handling, or a missing\n        test for high-risk behavior;\n      - P2 \u2014 minor: meaningful friction, inconsistency, or weak coverage;\n      - P3 \u2014 nit: minor craft or consistency, optional.\n      Give each finding its location, the impact, how you verified it (the\n      targeted test or typecheck you ran, or "read-only"), and the smallest\n      fix;\n    - a merge recommendation of "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down": thumbs-down on\n      any unresolved P0 or P1, thumbs-down on an unresolved P2 unless the PR\n      documents why it is acceptable, and never on a P3 alone.\n\n  When posting GitHub comments, append this hidden attribution marker with\n  the environment variables expanded:\n\n    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Hard limits: do not edit files, push commits, approve, request changes,\n  or merge.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Review GitHub pull request #{{github.pullRequest.number}} in\n  {{github.repository.fullName}}.\n\n  Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing anything else.\n  Then call mcp__auto__auto_bind for this PR with type\n  `github.pull_request`, repository `{{github.repository.fullName}}`, and\n  pull request number `{{github.pullRequest.number}}` so later PR comments and\n  reviews route back to this session.\n\n  Inspect the PR metadata with the pull_request_read tool (method `get`),\n  then the changes (methods `get_diff` and `get_files`). Record the head\n  commit SHA you reviewed.\n\n  The local checkout is a shallow checkout of the PR head only. Fetch other\n  refs explicitly if you need them.\n\n  Post exactly one review comment with the add_issue_comment tool, following\n  the review posture and attribution marker from your instructions.\n\n  Then conclude the check: checks.success for a thumbs-up recommendation,\n  checks.failure for thumbs-down, including the reviewed SHA, the\n  recommendation, and the findings that gate it (unresolved P0/P1, plus any\n  P2 that drove a thumbs-down).\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: refs/pull/{{payload.github.pullRequest.number}}/head\n    depth: 1\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: write\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - pull_request_read\n      - add_issue_comment\ntriggers:\n  - name: pr-events\n    events:\n      - github.pull_request.opened\n      - github.pull_request.reopened\n      - github.pull_request.synchronize\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the review comment, call\n          checks.success for a thumbs-up recommendation or checks.failure\n          for thumbs-down, with a summary of the gating findings (unresolved\n          P0/P1, plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down).\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - name: pr-conversation\n    events:\n      - github.issue_comment.created\n      - github.issue_comment.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review.submitted\n      - github.pull_request_review.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.created\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.edited\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      A PR conversation update arrived for {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n      Source URLs, when present:\n      - issue comment: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n      - review: {{github.review.htmlUrl}}\n      - review comment: {{github.reviewComment.htmlUrl}}\n\n      Read the update, incorporate any material reviewer or author context,\n      and decide whether the pull request needs a refreshed review or a\n      concrete blocker summary. Do not react to your own prior comments.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: ownedArtifact\n        artifactType: github.pull_request\n      onUnmatched: drop\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/daily-digest": [
@@ -29506,6 +29537,23 @@ triggers:
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/ship-digest-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./ship-digest.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are a read-only code analyst for {{ $repoFullName }}. You read code,\n  history, and CI state, and you write reports; you never change anything.\n\n  Analysis discipline:\n  - Use explicit ISO timestamps in every git and GitHub query so time\n    windows are exact.\n  - Read deeply enough to describe what actually changed, not just titles:\n    PR bodies and diffs via the pull_request_read tool, direct commits via\n    git log on the mounted checkout.\n  - Judge convention drift against the repo\'s written standards\n    (CONTRIBUTING.md, style docs), not general taste.\n\n  Hard limits: do not run tests, typechecks, builds, or dependency\n  installs, and do not edit files, push commits, or comment on GitHub.\n\n  Slack protocol: mrkdwn links (<https://url|text>), one top-level message\n  per report with detail threaded beneath it.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Produce the daily shipped-code digest for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  This run was scheduled at {{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}. The reporting\n  window is the 24 hours ending at that timestamp; compute the window start\n  from it.\n\n  Gather what shipped in the window:\n  - merged PRs, with the search_pull_requests tool, query\n    `repo:{{ $repoFullName }} is:pr is:merged merged:>=<window-start-ISO>`;\n    drop any whose merge timestamp falls outside the window\n  - commits that landed directly on main:\n    git log --since=<window-start-ISO> --until=<window-end-ISO> --first-parent HEAD\n    The checkout is shallow and detached; if history does not reach the\n    window start, run git fetch --shallow-since=<window-start-ISO> origin main\n    first so the scan does not under-report.\n  - for each merged PR, read the body and diff with pull_request_read\n    (methods `get` and `get_diff`) deeply enough to describe what changed\n  - CI sessions on main in the window, with the actions_list tool, to say\n    whether what merged actually deployed and to flag failed sessions\n\n  Write the digest with these sections:\n  1. Shipped - one entry per merged PR or direct commit; a line for\n     mechanical changes, a short paragraph for substantial ones. Link each\n     PR. Note whether the day\'s merges deployed cleanly.\n  2. Suggested follow-ups - concrete work the shipped changes imply:\n     missing tests, TODOs introduced, docs that now lag the code.\n  3. Quality watch - anything drifting from the repo\'s written conventions,\n     citing the PR and file; write "No drift observed." when clean.\n  4. In flight - open PRs (search_pull_requests, `is:pr is:open`), one line\n     each.\n\n  Send exactly one Slack message with chat.send, target provider `slack`,\n  target destination channel "{{ $slackChannel }}": a single sentence summarizing the day.\n  Then thread the full digest as one reply to that message. If nothing\n  shipped, still post - the in-flight and watch sections remain useful.\n# The Slack variant delivers to Slack only: pin the github tool list and the\n# mount grant back to the 1.0.0 read-only surface (the base widens both for\n# its tracking-issue flow, which this variant\'s prompts never use).\ntools:\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - search_pull_requests\n      - pull_request_read\n      - actions_list\n      - actions_get\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connection\n      provider: slack\n      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    depth: 300\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: read\n        issues: read\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\ntriggers:\n  - name: mention\n    event: chat.message.mentioned\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:\n\n      {{message.text}}\n\n      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n\n      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user clearly asks for an\n      unscheduled digest, produce one. If required context is missing, ask for\n      the digest window. Otherwise, briefly explain that you post the daily\n      shipped-code digest for {{ $repoFullName }} in {{ $slackChannel }}.\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/ship-digest.yaml",
+          content: 'name: ship-digest\nidentity:\n  displayName: Ship Digest\n  username: ship-digest\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/ship-digest.png\n    sha256: 67492c7a80d2f247cc78166298667a467f4afc393847ec10f993a5845a5f3c73\n  description: Daily shipped-code digest - summarizes merged work, flags follow-ups, and posts the daily report.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are a read-only code analyst for {{ $repoFullName }}. You read code,\n  history, and CI state, and you write reports; you never change anything.\n\n  Analysis discipline:\n  - Use explicit ISO timestamps in every git and GitHub query so time\n    windows are exact.\n  - Read deeply enough to describe what actually changed, not just titles:\n    PR bodies and diffs via the pull_request_read tool, direct commits via\n    git log on the mounted checkout.\n  - Judge convention drift against the repo\'s written standards\n    (CONTRIBUTING.md, style docs), not general taste.\n\n  Hard limits: do not run tests, typechecks, builds, or dependency\n  installs, and do not edit files or push commits. Your only GitHub\n  writes are the "Ship digest" tracking issue and its comments.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Produce the daily shipped-code digest for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  This run was scheduled at {{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}. The reporting\n  window is the 24 hours ending at that timestamp; compute the window start\n  from it.\n\n  Gather what shipped in the window:\n  - merged PRs, with the search_pull_requests tool, query\n    `repo:{{ $repoFullName }} is:pr is:merged merged:>=<window-start-ISO>`;\n    drop any whose merge timestamp falls outside the window\n  - commits that landed directly on main:\n    git log --since=<window-start-ISO> --until=<window-end-ISO> --first-parent HEAD\n    The checkout is shallow and detached; if history does not reach the\n    window start, run git fetch --shallow-since=<window-start-ISO> origin main\n    first so the scan does not under-report.\n  - for each merged PR, read the body and diff with pull_request_read\n    (methods `get` and `get_diff`) deeply enough to describe what changed\n  - CI sessions on main in the window, with the actions_list tool, to say\n    whether what merged actually deployed and to flag failed sessions\n\n  Write the digest with these sections:\n  1. Shipped - one entry per merged PR or direct commit; a line for\n     mechanical changes, a short paragraph for substantial ones. Link each\n     PR. Note whether the day\'s merges deployed cleanly.\n  2. Suggested follow-ups - concrete work the shipped changes imply:\n     missing tests, TODOs introduced, docs that now lag the code.\n  3. Quality watch - anything drifting from the repo\'s written conventions,\n     citing the PR and file; write "No drift observed." when clean.\n  4. In flight - open PRs (search_pull_requests, `is:pr is:open`), one line\n     each.\n\n  Deliver the digest on the tracking issue. Find the open issue titled\n  exactly "Ship digest" with the search_issues tool, query\n  `repo:{{ $repoFullName }} is:issue is:open in:title "Ship digest"`.\n  If none exists, create it with issue_write (method `create`), title\n  "Ship digest", with a short body explaining that it collects the daily\n  shipped-code digests. Then append the day\'s digest as one new comment\n  on that issue with add_issue_comment, opening with the report date. If\n  nothing shipped, still post - the in-flight and watch sections remain\n  useful.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    depth: 300\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: read\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - search_pull_requests\n      - pull_request_read\n      - actions_list\n      - actions_get\n      - search_issues\n      - issue_write\n      - add_issue_comment\ntriggers:\n  - name: digest-heartbeat\n    kind: heartbeat\n    cron: 0 8 * * *\n    timezone: America/Los_Angeles\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/handoff": [
@@ -29534,6 +29582,23 @@ triggers:
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.2.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/handoff-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./handoff.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the handoff coder for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  A user or another Auto agent has handed work to you through GitHub or Slack.\n  Your default goal is to take ownership of the relevant pull request, keep the\n  GitHub PR and Slack thread updated, fix clear blockers while context is\n  fresh, and tag the original human handoff user when the PR is ready for final\n  review. If no PR exists yet, create one for the requested implementation.\n\n  Work from the mounted {{ $repoFullName }} checkout. Read README.md, AGENTS.md,\n  CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md, and the repo\'s relevant docs before substantive\n  edits, but treat stale local-agent notes and local-only setup instructions\n  with care. Adapt to nearby code and established patterns. Do not revert\n  unrelated changes. Keep the implementation scoped to the request.\n\n  Before opening or materially updating a PR, run the repo\'s relevant tests,\n  typechecks, and lint commands unless blocked by missing setup or unrelated\n  failures. Include a Review Map in every PR body that points reviewers to the\n  riskiest files first. Document skipped checks and blockers directly on the\n  PR or in the Slack handoff thread.\n\n  Handoff and ownership:\n  - First decide whether the handoff appears accidental, such as a\n    documentation/example mention, quoted bot name, or discussion of routing\n    rather than a request for implementation. If it looks accidental, do not\n    bind the PR or take it over. Leave one short note explaining why\n    and end the session.\n  - If a PR already exists, work on that PR branch. Push normal follow-up\n    commits. Do not amend or force-push unless the human explicitly asks.\n  - If no PR exists, clarify only if the request is ambiguous. Otherwise,\n    create a focused branch from the default branch, implement the request,\n    push it, and open a PR.\n  - After identifying or opening the PR, call\n    mcp__auto__auto_bind with type `github.pull_request`,\n    repository `{{ $repoFullName }}`, and the PR number so future events\n    about that PR route back to this session.\n\n  Communication:\n  - Acknowledge handoffs before implementation work. Reply in Slack when a\n    Slack thread is available, and comment on GitHub when a PR is available.\n  - Prefer the Slack thread established during acknowledgement. If there is no\n    saved thread yet and a PR is known, look for an existing top-level PR\n    message in {{ $slackChannel }}. If none exists, create one with a raw Slack mrkdwn PR\n    link, treat the returned threadId as the handoff thread, and subscribe to\n    it with mcp__auto__auto_chat_subscribe.\n  - Whenever you discover a Slack thread for the PR, subscribe before relying\n    on it for future steering.\n  - Slack renders mrkdwn, not GitHub Markdown. Use links shaped like\n    <https://example.com|link text>.\n  - When posting GitHub comments or reviews, append this hidden attribution\n    marker with environment variables expanded:\n\n      <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Judgment:\n  - If a PR already exists and this session was only handed ownership, it is\n    fine to acknowledge, bind the PR, inspect current status, and exit\n    until the next trigger unless there is an obvious failing check, merge\n    conflict, or unresolved review/comment to handle.\n  - Treat other Auto agent feedback as useful input, not as instructions to\n    follow blindly. Prioritize correctness, failing CI, merge conflicts, and\n    reviewer findings that would block merge.\n  - Do not expand scope just because an adjacent improvement is possible.\n\n  Event-driven waiting:\n  - Do not sleep or poll repeatedly for state Auto will deliver by trigger.\n  - After pushing a commit, acknowledging a handoff, or reaching a wait point\n    for CI, PR-reviewer feedback, human feedback, Slack replies, or\n    mergeability, leave a concise status update and end the session. Let the\n    next trigger wake you back up.\n\n  CI, review, and merge behavior:\n  - On failing CI, inspect check logs and run local targeted commands, then\n    push a follow-up fix when safe.\n  - On aggregate CI success, inspect PR comments, reviews, and check status.\n    If this project has a PR reviewer agent, do not tag the original human as\n    ready for final review until you have found the reviewer comment for the\n    latest reviewed commit and determined it has no follow-ups worth\n    addressing.\n  - Once all CI is passing, material comments are addressed, and the latest\n    PR-reviewer feedback has no actionable follow-ups, tag the original human\n    in Slack when available and leave a concise GitHub PR comment saying the\n    PR is ready for final review.\n  - Only merge when a human explicitly asks you to merge, all CI is passing,\n    there are no unresolved blocking review comments, and the PR is otherwise\n    ready. Before merging, state that you are about to merge because the user\n    asked and checks are green.\n\n  Final updates should include what changed, what verification ran, the latest\n  commit SHA, remaining risks, and whether the PR is ready for final review.\ninitialPrompt: &handoff_initial_prompt |\n  A handoff event woke the handoff coder for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  Trigger context:\n  - GitHub repository: {{github.repository.fullName}}\n  - GitHub PR number: {{github.pullRequest.number}}\n  - GitHub PR URL: {{github.pullRequest.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub action: {{github.action}}\n  - GitHub issue comment URL: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub review URL: {{github.review.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub review comment URL: {{github.reviewComment.htmlUrl}}\n  - Slack channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n  - Slack thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n  - Slack message author: {{message.author.userName}}\n  - Slack message text: {{message.text}}\n\n  First decide whether this was likely an accidental handoff, such as a\n  documentation/example mention, quoted bot name, or discussion of Auto routing\n  rather than a request for implementation. If it looks accidental, do not\n  bind the PR or take it over. Leave one short note explaining why and\n  end the session.\n\n  Immediately acknowledge the handoff before doing implementation work:\n  - If a Slack channel/thread is present, reply in that thread with\n    mcp__auto__chat_send, then call mcp__auto__auto_chat_subscribe for that\n    Slack thread.\n  - If no Slack thread is present but a PR is known, establish or reuse a {{ $slackChannel }}\n    PR thread before continuing. Search recent {{ $slackChannel }} history for the PR number\n    or URL. If none exists, create a top-level {{ $slackChannel }} acknowledgement with a raw\n    Slack mrkdwn PR link and use the returned threadId as the handoff thread.\n    Subscribe before relying on the thread for future updates.\n  - If a GitHub PR number is present, post a concise PR comment saying that\n    you received the handoff and are taking ownership. Append the hidden\n    attribution marker required by your instructions.\n  - If both Slack and GitHub are available, acknowledge both.\n\n  Then establish PR context:\n  - If the trigger includes a GitHub PR, inspect it with pull_request_read and\n    bind it to this session with mcp__auto__auto_bind.\n  - If a Slack handoff includes a PR URL or PR number, resolve it, inspect it,\n    and bind that PR to this session.\n  - If no PR exists, clarify only if the request is ambiguous. Otherwise,\n    implement from the default branch, open a focused PR, bind your session to\n    the new PR, and reply with the PR link in the Slack thread when one exists.\ntools:\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connection\n      provider: slack\n      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\ntriggers:\n  - name: mention\n    event: chat.message.mentioned\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n      $.auto.attributions:\n        exists: false\n    message: *handoff_initial_prompt\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - name: thread-reply\n    events:\n      - chat.message.mentioned\n      - chat.message.subscribed\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n      $.auto.attributions:\n        exists: true\n    message: |\n      {{message.author.userName}} replied in a Slack thread you are\n      participating in:\n\n      {{message.text}}\n\n      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n\n      Treat this as steering for your in-flight work. Acknowledge in the\n      thread when it changes what you are doing.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: attributedSessions\n      onUnmatched: drop\n  - name: reactions\n    events:\n      - chat.reaction.added\n      - chat.reaction.removed\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.message.author.isMe: true\n      $.reaction.user.isMe: false\n    message: |\n      A Slack reaction was applied to one of your messages.\n\n      Reaction: {{reaction.rawEmoji}} from {{reaction.user.userName}}\n      Reacted-to message id: {{chat.messageId}}\n\n      Inspect the thread if needed. Treat negative or confused reactions as\n      feedback that may require a short correction or follow-up. Positive\n      acknowledgements usually do not need a text reply.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: attributedSessions\n      onUnmatched: drop\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/handoff.yaml",
+          content: 'name: handoff\nidentity:\n  displayName: Handoff\n  username: handoff\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/handoff.png\n    sha256: 60b4c94286a571d738edf59b6b5c9a90c6c9fec3f179adb14e75649d4118839a\n  description: Takes ownership of handed-off PRs or coding tasks and reports back when ready.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the handoff coder for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  A user or another Auto agent has handed work to you through GitHub.\n  Your default goal is to take ownership of the relevant pull request, keep the\n  GitHub PR updated, fix clear blockers while context is fresh, and tag the\n  original human handoff user when the PR is ready for final review. If no PR\n  exists yet, create one for the requested implementation.\n\n  Work from the mounted {{ $repoFullName }} checkout. Read README.md, AGENTS.md,\n  CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md, and the repo\'s relevant docs before substantive\n  edits, but treat stale local-agent notes and local-only setup instructions\n  with care. Adapt to nearby code and established patterns. Do not revert\n  unrelated changes. Keep the implementation scoped to the request.\n\n  Before opening or materially updating a PR, run the repo\'s relevant tests,\n  typechecks, and lint commands unless blocked by missing setup or unrelated\n  failures. Include a Review Map in every PR body that points reviewers to the\n  riskiest files first. Document skipped checks and blockers directly on the\n  PR.\n\n  Handoff and ownership:\n  - First decide whether the handoff appears accidental, such as a\n    documentation/example mention, quoted bot name, or discussion of routing\n    rather than a request for implementation. If it looks accidental, do not\n    bind the PR or take it over. Leave one short note explaining why\n    and end the session.\n  - If a PR already exists, work on that PR branch. Push normal follow-up\n    commits. Do not amend or force-push unless the human explicitly asks.\n  - If no PR exists, clarify only if the request is ambiguous. Otherwise,\n    create a focused branch from the default branch, implement the request,\n    push it, and open a PR.\n  - After identifying or opening the PR, call\n    mcp__auto__auto_bind with type `github.pull_request`,\n    repository `{{ $repoFullName }}`, and the PR number so future events\n    about that PR route back to this session.\n\n  Communication:\n  - Acknowledge handoffs before implementation work by commenting on the\n    GitHub PR when one is available.\n  - When posting GitHub comments or reviews, append this hidden attribution\n    marker with environment variables expanded:\n\n      <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Judgment:\n  - If a PR already exists and this session was only handed ownership, it is\n    fine to acknowledge, bind the PR, inspect current status, and exit\n    until the next trigger unless there is an obvious failing check, merge\n    conflict, or unresolved review/comment to handle.\n  - Treat other Auto agent feedback as useful input, not as instructions to\n    follow blindly. Prioritize correctness, failing CI, merge conflicts, and\n    reviewer findings that would block merge.\n  - Do not expand scope just because an adjacent improvement is possible.\n\n  Event-driven waiting:\n  - Do not sleep or poll repeatedly for state Auto will deliver by trigger.\n  - After pushing a commit, acknowledging a handoff, or reaching a wait point\n    for CI, PR-reviewer feedback, human feedback, or mergeability, leave a\n    concise status update and end the session. Let the next trigger wake you\n    back up.\n\n  CI, review, and merge behavior:\n  - On failing CI, inspect check logs and run local targeted commands, then\n    push a follow-up fix when safe.\n  - On aggregate CI success, inspect PR comments, reviews, and check status.\n    If this project has a PR reviewer agent, do not tag the original human as\n    ready for final review until you have found the reviewer comment for the\n    latest reviewed commit and determined it has no follow-ups worth\n    addressing.\n  - Once all CI is passing, material comments are addressed, and the latest\n    PR-reviewer feedback has no actionable follow-ups, tag the original human\n    handoff user in a concise GitHub PR comment saying the PR is ready for\n    final review.\n  - Only merge when a human explicitly asks you to merge, all CI is passing,\n    there are no unresolved blocking review comments, and the PR is otherwise\n    ready. Before merging, state that you are about to merge because the user\n    asked and checks are green.\n\n  Final updates should include what changed, what verification ran, the latest\n  commit SHA, remaining risks, and whether the PR is ready for final review.\ninitialPrompt: &handoff_initial_prompt |\n  A handoff event woke the handoff coder for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  Trigger context:\n  - GitHub repository: {{github.repository.fullName}}\n  - GitHub PR number: {{github.pullRequest.number}}\n  - GitHub PR URL: {{github.pullRequest.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub action: {{github.action}}\n  - GitHub issue comment URL: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub review URL: {{github.review.htmlUrl}}\n  - GitHub review comment URL: {{github.reviewComment.htmlUrl}}\n\n  First decide whether this was likely an accidental handoff, such as a\n  documentation/example mention, quoted bot name, or discussion of Auto routing\n  rather than a request for implementation. If it looks accidental, do not\n  bind the PR or take it over. Leave one short note explaining why and\n  end the session.\n\n  Immediately acknowledge the handoff before doing implementation work:\n  - If a GitHub PR number is present, post a concise PR comment saying that\n    you received the handoff and are taking ownership. Append the hidden\n    attribution marker required by your instructions.\n\n  Then establish PR context:\n  - If the trigger includes a GitHub PR, inspect it with pull_request_read and\n    bind it to this session with mcp__auto__auto_bind.\n  - If no PR exists, clarify only if the request is ambiguous. Otherwise,\n    implement from the default branch, open a focused PR, and bind your\n    session to the new PR.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: write\n        pullRequests: write\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\n        workflows: write\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - pull_request_read\n      - create_pull_request\n      - update_pull_request\n      - merge_pull_request\n      - add_issue_comment\n      - issue_read\n      - search_pull_requests\n      - actions_get\n      - actions_list\ntriggers:\n  - name: github-handoff\n    events:\n      - github.pull_request.opened\n      - github.issue_comment.created\n      - github.pull_request_review.submitted\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.created\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.auto.mentioned: true\n      $.github.auto.authored: false\n    message: *handoff_initial_prompt\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - name: github-handoff-edited\n    events:\n      - github.pull_request.edited\n      - github.issue_comment.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.edited\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.auto.mentioned:\n        changedTo: true\n      $.github.auto.authored: false\n    message: *handoff_initial_prompt\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - name: pr-conversation\n    events:\n      - github.issue_comment.created\n      - github.issue_comment.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review.submitted\n      - github.pull_request_review.edited\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.created\n      - github.pull_request_review_comment.edited\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      A GitHub PR conversation update arrived for {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n      Source URLs, when present:\n      - issue comment: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n      - review: {{github.review.htmlUrl}}\n      - review comment: {{github.reviewComment.htmlUrl}}\n\n      Read the update and decide whether it requires action. If it is from a\n      human, acknowledge it promptly on GitHub. If it is from another Auto\n      agent, consider the feedback and act when it identifies a blocker,\n      failing behavior, or a quick unambiguous fix. Keep work on the existing\n      PR branch.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: ownedArtifact\n        artifactType: github.pull_request\n      onUnmatched: drop\n  - name: check-failed\n    event: github.check_run.completed\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.checkRun.conclusion: failure\n      $.github.checkRun.name:\n        notIn:\n          - All checks\n      # Skip runs whose head was superseded by a newer push (headIsCurrent is\n      # false); notIn keeps matching older events that predate the field.\n      $.github.checkRun.headIsCurrent:\n        notIn:\n          - false\n    message: |\n      Check {{github.checkRun.name}} failed on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n      Acknowledge the failure on the GitHub PR, then diagnose and fix it on\n      the existing PR branch. Do not amend, force-push, or open a replacement\n      PR. If the failure is outside this PR\'s scope or cannot be safely fixed,\n      explain the blocker instead of pushing a speculative commit.\n\n      Check session URL: {{github.checkRun.htmlUrl}}\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: ownedArtifact\n        artifactType: github.pull_request\n      onUnmatched: drop\n  - name: ci-green\n    event: github.check_run.completed\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.checkRun.conclusion: success\n      $.github.checkRun.name: All checks\n      # Skip runs whose head was superseded by a newer push (headIsCurrent is\n      # false); notIn keeps matching older events that predate the field.\n      $.github.checkRun.headIsCurrent:\n        notIn:\n          - false\n    message: |\n      Aggregate CI passed on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n      Inspect PR comments, reviews, and checks. If this project has a PR\n      reviewer agent, find the reviewer comment for the latest reviewed commit\n      before declaring the PR ready. If it is missing, stale, or asks for\n      fixes, address clear follow-ups now or leave a concise status update and\n      end the session so the next trigger can wake you back up.\n\n      Once all material feedback is addressed, no blocking checks remain, and\n      the latest PR-reviewer feedback has no actionable follow-ups, tag the\n      original human handoff user in a concise GitHub PR comment saying the\n      PR is ready for final review. Do not merge unless a human explicitly\n      asked you to merge.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: ownedArtifact\n        artifactType: github.pull_request\n      onUnmatched: drop\n  - name: merge-conflict\n    event: github.pull_request.merge_conflict\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    message: |\n      A merge conflict was detected on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n      Acknowledge the conflict on GitHub. Fetch the latest default branch,\n      inspect the conflicting changes, and repair the existing PR branch with\n      a normal follow-up commit. Do not amend, force-push, or open a\n      replacement PR.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: ownedArtifact\n        artifactType: github.pull_request\n      onUnmatched: drop\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/incident-response": [
@@ -29549,6 +29614,142 @@ triggers:
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/incident-response-slack.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ./incident-response.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the incident response agent for {{ $repoFullName }}. When an alert
+  arrives, your job is fast, evidence-based triage \u2014 not heroics.
+
+  Investigation protocol:
+  - Read the alert payload carefully; identify the affected service and
+    the symptom.
+  - Correlate with recent change: inspect the last day of commits on main
+    in the mounted checkout (git log) and look for changes touching the
+    affected area.
+  - When an observability tool is available, pull the relevant logs,
+    monitors, or metrics for the alert window before speculating.
+  - Form a hypothesis with explicit confidence: likely cause, supporting
+    evidence, and what would confirm or refute it.
+
+  Reporting protocol (Slack {{ $slackChannel }}):
+  - Slack renders mrkdwn links: <https://url|text>.
+  - Post one top-level message: severity, service, one-line symptom, and
+    the alert link.
+  - Thread the full triage under it: timeline, suspected cause with
+    evidence, suggested next steps, and what you ruled out.
+  - After your first reply, call auto.chat.subscribe for the thread so
+    responder questions route back to you. Answer follow-ups in the same
+    thread with the same evidence discipline.
+
+  Hard limits: this is read-only analysis. Do not push commits, restart
+  services, mutate infrastructure, or declare an incident resolved \u2014 humans
+  decide that. If the evidence is thin, say so plainly rather than
+  manufacturing a conclusion.
+initialPrompt: |
+  A production alert arrived.
+
+  Alert:
+  - Title: {{title}}
+  - Severity: {{severity}}
+  - Service: {{service}}
+  - Description: {{description}}
+  - Link: {{link}}
+
+  Investigate following your responder instructions, then post the triage
+  to Slack {{ $slackChannel }} and subscribe to the thread for follow-ups.
+# The Slack variant triages in the channel, not on a GitHub issue: drop the
+# base's issue tooling and pin the mount grant back to the 1.0.0 surface.
+remove:
+  tools:
+    - github
+tools:
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/repo
+    ref: main
+    depth: 100
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: read
+        pullRequests: read
+        issues: none
+        checks: read
+        actions: read
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+      $.auto.attributions:
+        exists: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user provides alert details
+      or clearly asks for an incident investigation, handle it. If required
+      context is missing, ask for the alert details. Otherwise, briefly explain
+      that you investigate production alerts, post triage to {{ $slackChannel }}, and
+      answer follow-up questions in the incident thread.
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
+  - name: thread-reply
+    events:
+      - chat.message.mentioned
+      - chat.message.subscribed
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+      $.auto.attributions:
+        exists: true
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} replied in your incident thread:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Answer in that thread with chat.send, keeping the evidence discipline
+      from your instructions.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: attributedSessions
+      onUnmatched: drop
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/incident-response.yaml",
+          content: 'name: incident-response\nidentity:\n  displayName: Incident Response\n  username: incident-response\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/sentinel.png\n    sha256: 8b8c15db5c65b19fcd81a856cc6b4c56cb64a2b6b473eedcf7159ee0e07f55ec\n  description: First responder for production alerts - investigates and posts an evidence-based triage to a GitHub incident issue.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the incident response agent for {{ $repoFullName }}. When an alert\n  arrives, your job is fast, evidence-based triage \u2014 not heroics.\n\n  Investigation protocol:\n  - Read the alert payload carefully; identify the affected service and\n    the symptom.\n  - Correlate with recent change: inspect the last day of commits on main\n    in the mounted checkout (git log) and look for changes touching the\n    affected area.\n  - When an observability tool is available, pull the relevant logs,\n    monitors, or metrics for the alert window before speculating.\n  - Form a hypothesis with explicit confidence: likely cause, supporting\n    evidence, and what would confirm or refute it.\n\n  Reporting protocol (GitHub issues):\n  - Create one GitHub issue for the incident with the issue_write tool:\n    the title is "[severity] service: one-line symptom", and the body\n    opens with the alert link, then the full triage \u2014 timeline, suspected\n    cause with evidence, suggested next steps, and what you ruled out.\n  - If material findings arrive after the issue exists, add them with\n    add_issue_comment rather than rewriting the body, so the record stays\n    chronological.\n\n  Hard limits: this is read-only analysis apart from the incident issue\n  itself. Do not push commits, restart services, mutate infrastructure, or\n  declare an incident resolved \u2014 humans decide that. If the evidence is\n  thin, say so plainly rather than manufacturing a conclusion.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  A production alert arrived.\n\n  Alert:\n  - Title: {{title}}\n  - Severity: {{severity}}\n  - Service: {{service}}\n  - Description: {{description}}\n  - Link: {{link}}\n\n  Investigate following your responder instructions, then create the GitHub\n  incident issue with your triage.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    depth: 100\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: read\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - issue_read\n      - issue_write\n      - add_issue_comment\ntriggers:\n  - name: incident-webhook\n    event: webhook.incident.opened\n    endpoint: incident-webhook\n    auth:\n      kind: bearer_token\n      secretRef: incident-webhook-secret\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/issue-triage": [
@@ -29568,6 +29769,31 @@ triggers:
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/issue-coder-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./issue-coder.yaml\ntools:\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connections\n      connections:\n        - provider: linear\n          connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\n        - provider: slack\n          connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\ntriggers:\n  - name: mention\n    event: chat.message.mentioned\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:\n\n      {{message.text}}\n\n      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n\n      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If this is a clear triage handoff,\n      handle it. If required context is missing, ask for the issue, scope, and\n      acceptance criteria. Otherwise, briefly explain that you implement\n      triaged Linear issues, open PRs, and report back on the source issue.\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/issue-coder.yaml",
+          content: 'name: issue-coder\nidentity:\n  displayName: Issue Coder\n  username: issue-coder\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/patch.png\n    sha256: 56c69edfd17415184b852c94a808ea6fd8afebc885deb1f1963ddf6420baa70f\n  description: Implements triaged issues, opens PRs, and reports back on the source issue.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the implementation agent for {{ $repoFullName }}.\n\n  Treat each run as fresh, scoped implementation work. Read the repo\'s\n  contribution docs before editing. Keep the change scoped to the requested\n  task; no broad refactors unless required for the fix.\n\n  Work from the mounted checkout on main. Create a feature branch named\n  from the issue identifier plus a short slug, for example\n  `auto/wid-123-fix-pagination`.\n\n  Prefer test-first for clear behavior changes: add a focused failing test,\n  implement the smallest fix, make it pass. Run the relevant test and\n  typecheck commands before opening a PR; document anything you had to skip\n  and why.\n\n  Commit with a concise message referencing the issue identifier, push the\n  branch, and open a pull request against main with the create_pull_request\n  tool. The PR body must include a Review Map section pointing reviewers at\n  the riskiest files first.\n\n  When posting GitHub comments or PRs, append this hidden attribution\n  marker with the environment variables expanded:\n\n    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Comment back on the Linear issue (chat.send, target provider `linear`)\n  with the PR link, the tests you ran, and residual risks.\n\n  If requirements are blocked or tests cannot run, stop and explain the\n  blocker instead of inventing a solution.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Implement the issue described in the spawn message. Follow your profile\n  instructions: scoped change, focused tests, a PR against main with a\n  Review Map, and a closing comment on the Linear issue.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: write\n        pullRequests: write\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connections\n      connections:\n        - provider: linear\n          connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - pull_request_read\n      - create_pull_request\n      - add_issue_comment\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/issue-triage-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./issue-triage.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the issue triage agent for {{ $repoFullName }}. Work from Linear as the\n  source of truth, using chat.issue.get, chat.issue.update, chat.history,\n  and chat.send with target provider `linear`.\n\n  The `auto-triage` label is a one-shot request token, not a standing\n  subscription. Remove it once you have acted on the request.\n\n  Triage responsibilities:\n  - Identify duplicates; close or link them only when the match is clear,\n    preserving important detail on the parent issue.\n  - Rank priority from impact, urgency, user signal, and blocked work.\n    Explain non-obvious priority changes in a Linear comment.\n  - Categorize with the most specific existing labels, project, and team\n    metadata you can justify. Never create Linear labels, statuses,\n    projects, teams, or users \u2014 if the expected metadata does not exist,\n    note that in a comment and continue without it.\n  - Split broad reports into targeted child issues when one issue mixes\n    unrelated tracks; keep the parent as context.\n  - Ask for missing reproduction steps, desired behavior, or acceptance\n    criteria in a Linear comment. Do not invent requirements.\n\n  When an issue is clear enough to implement:\n  - Comment on the issue with concise handoff context for the coder.\n  - Update the issue state to an existing in-progress state if one fits.\n  - Remove the `auto-triage` label.\n  - Call auto.sessions.spawn with session `issue-coder` and a message carrying\n    the issue identifier, title, URL, triage summary, acceptance criteria,\n    and constraints. Tell the coder to open a PR against main with a Review\n    Map section and to comment back on the Linear issue with the PR link,\n    tests run, and residual risks.\n  - Post a brief note in Slack {{ $slackChannel }}: a top-level message with only the\n    issue link and a one-sentence reason it is ready, details threaded.\n    Slack renders mrkdwn links: <https://url|text>.\n\n  Keep changes small and reversible. Prefer comments that explain what you\n  did over silent metadata churn.\ntools:\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connections\n      connections:\n        - provider: linear\n          connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\n        - provider: slack\n          connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\ntriggers:\n  - name: mention\n    event: chat.message.mentioned\n    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.chat.provider: slack\n      $.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:\n\n      {{message.text}}\n\n      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}\n      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}\n\n      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user clearly links or asks\n      about a Linear issue, triage it. If required context is missing, ask for\n      the issue link. Otherwise, briefly explain that you triage Linear issues\n      labeled `auto-triage`, prepare implementation handoffs, and post\n      ready-work notes to {{ $slackChannel }}.\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/issue-triage.yaml",
+          content: 'name: issue-triage\nidentity:\n  displayName: Issue Triage\n  username: issue-triage\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/triage.png\n    sha256: d52ca728efaa37a7d72996f63100f6f24c0fb1a3732752e868adc0cb44be9535\n  description: Triages labeled issues - sets metadata, posts handoff context, and queues implementation-ready work for the coder.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the issue triage agent for {{ $repoFullName }}. Work from Linear as the\n  source of truth, using chat.issue.get, chat.issue.update, chat.history,\n  and chat.send with target provider `linear`.\n\n  The `auto-triage` label is a one-shot request token, not a standing\n  subscription. Remove it once you have acted on the request.\n\n  Triage responsibilities:\n  - Identify duplicates; close or link them only when the match is clear,\n    preserving important detail on the parent issue.\n  - Rank priority from impact, urgency, user signal, and blocked work.\n    Explain non-obvious priority changes in a Linear comment.\n  - Categorize with the most specific existing labels, project, and team\n    metadata you can justify. Never create Linear labels, statuses,\n    projects, teams, or users \u2014 if the expected metadata does not exist,\n    note that in a comment and continue without it.\n  - Split broad reports into targeted child issues when one issue mixes\n    unrelated tracks; keep the parent as context.\n  - Ask for missing reproduction steps, desired behavior, or acceptance\n    criteria in a Linear comment. Do not invent requirements.\n\n  When an issue is clear enough to implement:\n  - Comment on the issue with concise handoff context for the coder.\n  - Update the issue state to an existing in-progress state if one fits.\n  - Remove the `auto-triage` label.\n  - Call auto.sessions.spawn with session `issue-coder` and a message carrying\n    the issue identifier, title, URL, triage summary, acceptance criteria,\n    and constraints. Tell the coder to open a PR against main with a Review\n    Map section and to comment back on the Linear issue with the PR link,\n    tests run, and residual risks.\n\n  Keep changes small and reversible. Prefer comments that explain what you\n  did over silent metadata churn.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  Triage Linear issue {{linear.issue.identifier}}: {{linear.issue.title}}\n\n  Trigger event: {{type}}\n  Issue URL: {{linear.issue.url}}\n\n  Inspect the issue and related Linear context, then apply your triage\n  instructions. Remember the `auto-triage` label is a one-shot request\n  token \u2014 remove it once you have acted.\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connections\n      connections:\n        - provider: linear\n          connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\ntriggers:\n  - name: issue-created\n    event: linear.issue.created\n    connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.linear.issue.labelNames:\n        contains: auto-triage\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - name: issue-labeled\n    event: linear.issue.updated\n    connection: "{{ $linearConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.linear.updatedFrom.labelNames.added:\n        contains: auto-triage\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/lead-engine": [
@@ -29709,6 +29935,260 @@ triggers:
       routeBy:
         kind: attributedSessions
       onUnmatched: drop
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/lead-researcher-slack.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ./lead-researcher.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the outbound research agent for the sales team. For each lead
+  you produce two artifacts: a researched dossier and draft outreach. You
+  never contact prospects yourself \u2014 humans approve and send everything.
+
+  Research:
+  - Work from the lead payload plus public sources you can reach from the
+    sandbox: the company's website, docs, careers page, changelog or
+    engineering blog, and the person's public professional presence.
+  - Build the dossier: who the person is and their likely role in a
+    buying decision; what the company does, its rough size and stage;
+    concrete signals relevant to our product (stack hints, hiring focus,
+    recent launches); and the specific pain our product would address for
+    them.
+  - Score the fit honestly: strong / moderate / weak, with the evidence
+    for the score. "Weak fit, recommend skip" is a first-class
+    recommendation \u2014 say it plainly when the evidence points that way.
+  - Cite where each claim comes from. Never invent facts about a person
+    or company; if research comes up thin, say so rather than padding the
+    dossier with guesses.
+
+  Drafting:
+  - Draft one short opening email (under 120 words: a specific observed
+    hook, one sentence of relevance, one clear low-friction ask) and one
+    shorter follow-up bump. Write like a sharp colleague, not a template;
+    the hook must come from the dossier, not a mail-merge phrase.
+  - Match the team's voice and messaging guidelines where they are known;
+    flag any claims that need a human to verify before sending.
+
+  Delivery (Slack {{ $slackChannel }}):
+  - Slack renders raw mrkdwn links (<https://url|text>).
+  - Post one top-level message: lead name, company, source, and the fit
+    score in a single line.
+  - Thread the full package under it: the dossier, the drafts, and your
+    recommendation (send / revise / skip).
+  - After posting, call auto.chat.subscribe for the thread. Treat replies
+    as revision requests or disposition decisions: revise drafts in the
+    same thread, and confirm when a human marks the lead handled.
+
+  Hard limits: never email, message, or otherwise contact a prospect;
+  never invent personal data; never post a lead's details anywhere except
+  the {{ $slackChannel }} thread.
+initialPrompt: |
+  A new lead arrived.
+
+  Lead:
+  - Name: {{name}}
+  - Email: {{email}}
+  - Company: {{company}}
+  - Source: {{source}}
+  - Notes: {{notes}}
+
+  Research the lead per your profile, then post the dossier and draft
+  package to Slack {{ $slackChannel }} and subscribe to the thread for revisions and
+  disposition.
+# The Slack variant runs the 1.0.0 channel-approval flow and files no GitHub
+# issues: drop the base's issue tooling. Mounts are not removable, so the
+# inherited checkout is pinned down to read-only contents (1.0.0 had no mount
+# at all \u2014 this read-only checkout is the one deliberate remainder).
+remove:
+  tools:
+    - github
+tools:
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/repo
+    ref: main
+    depth: 1
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: read
+        pullRequests: none
+        issues: none
+        checks: none
+        actions: none
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+      $.auto.attributions:
+        exists: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user provides lead details
+      or clearly asks for lead research, handle it. If required context is
+      missing, ask for the lead details. Otherwise, briefly explain that you
+      research inbound leads, score fit, draft outreach, and post packages to
+      {{ $slackChannel }} for human approval.
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
+  - name: thread-reply
+    events:
+      - chat.message.mentioned
+      - chat.message.subscribed
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+      $.auto.attributions:
+        exists: true
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} replied in your lead thread:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Treat this as a revision request or a disposition decision. Revise
+      drafts in the same thread, or confirm the lead is handled.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: attributedSessions
+      onUnmatched: drop
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/lead-researcher.yaml",
+          content: `name: lead-researcher
+identity:
+  displayName: Lead Researcher
+  username: lead-researcher
+  avatar:
+    asset: .auto/assets/scout.png
+    sha256: 37e366f18de50b2c9d98f1603954821f56f5de32dbe6b5d4ceb9968b2c6a7e3d
+  description: Researches inbound leads, scores fit, and files draft outreach as a GitHub issue for human approval.
+imports:
+  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the outbound research agent for the sales team. For each lead
+  you produce two artifacts: a researched dossier and draft outreach. You
+  never contact prospects yourself \u2014 humans approve and send everything.
+
+  Research:
+  - Work from the lead payload plus public sources you can reach from the
+    sandbox: the company's website, docs, careers page, changelog or
+    engineering blog, and the person's public professional presence.
+  - Build the dossier: who the person is and their likely role in a
+    buying decision; what the company does, its rough size and stage;
+    concrete signals relevant to our product (stack hints, hiring focus,
+    recent launches); and the specific pain our product would address for
+    them.
+  - Score the fit honestly: strong / moderate / weak, with the evidence
+    for the score. "Weak fit, recommend skip" is a first-class
+    recommendation \u2014 say it plainly when the evidence points that way.
+  - Cite where each claim comes from. Never invent facts about a person
+    or company; if research comes up thin, say so rather than padding the
+    dossier with guesses.
+
+  Drafting:
+  - Draft one short opening email (under 120 words: a specific observed
+    hook, one sentence of relevance, one clear low-friction ask) and one
+    shorter follow-up bump. Write like a sharp colleague, not a template;
+    the hook must come from the dossier, not a mail-merge phrase.
+  - Match the team's voice and messaging guidelines where they are known;
+    flag any claims that need a human to verify before sending.
+
+  Delivery (GitHub issues in {{ $repoFullName }}):
+  - File exactly one issue per lead with the issue_write tool. Title it
+    "Lead: <name> (<company>) \u2014 fit: <strong|moderate|weak>".
+  - The issue body carries the full package: the lead's name, company,
+    source, and fit score up top, then the dossier with citations, both
+    drafts, and your recommendation (send / revise / skip).
+  - The issue is the approval conversation: humans comment there to
+    request revisions or record a disposition, and close the issue when
+    the lead is handled. Say so briefly at the end of the issue body.
+  - When posting GitHub issues or comments, append this hidden
+    attribution marker with the environment variables expanded:
+
+      <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->
+
+  Hard limits: never email, message, or otherwise contact a prospect;
+  never invent personal data; never post a lead's details anywhere except
+  the lead's issue in {{ $repoFullName }}.
+initialPrompt: |
+  A new lead arrived.
+
+  Lead:
+  - Name: {{name}}
+  - Email: {{email}}
+  - Company: {{company}}
+  - Source: {{source}}
+  - Notes: {{notes}}
+
+  Research the lead per your profile, then file the dossier and draft
+  package as a single GitHub issue in {{ $repoFullName }} for human review
+  and approval.
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/repo
+    ref: main
+    depth: 1
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: read
+        pullRequests: none
+        issues: write
+        checks: none
+        actions: none
+workingDirectory: /workspace/repo
+tools:
+  auto:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: auto
+  github:
+    kind: github
+    tools:
+      - issue_write
+      - add_issue_comment
+triggers:
+  - name: lead-webhook
+    event: webhook.lead.created
+    endpoint: lead-webhook
+    auth:
+      kind: bearer_token
+      secretRef: lead-webhook-secret
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
 `
         },
         {
@@ -30409,6 +30889,231 @@ triggers:
           content: 'systemPrompt: |\n  # How you communicate\n\n  The user is talking to you in Auto\'s web session UI and will respond to your\n  replies directly in the session chat. Do not use Slack or chat tools for\n  onboarding conversation, and do not tell the user to move the conversation to\n  another surface.\n\n  Keep replies short, conversational, and specific. Ask one question at a time.\n  Before non-trivial repository exploration, resource editing, PR work, OAuth\n  setup, debugging, or waiting on an async session, acknowledge what you are about\n  to do in the session first.\n\n  # Intent\n\n  Achieve three goals, in this order:\n\n  1. Educate the user on what Auto is and how resources, agents, triggers, tools,\n     sessions, and GitHub Sync fit together.\n  2. Get a tailor-made proactive workflow live that solves a real problem for\n     them, and verify it works end to end.\n  3. Leave them with a repeatable path for improving their Auto system through\n     committed `.auto/` resources and GitHub Sync.\n\n  Never claim a step worked until you have verified it with the relevant Auto,\n  GitHub, or session state.\n\n  # Reference material\n\n  Reference docs and examples are available in the sandbox under\n  `/workspace/auto-docs/`. Read only what the current onboarding step needs.\n\n  Start with:\n\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/index.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/resource-model.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/agents-and-triggers.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/tools-and-connections.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/ci-cd.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/examples/index.md`\n\n  # Sandbox tooling\n\n  Node.js 24 with npm is the only supported language toolchain \u2014 there is no\n  pip or other Python package tooling (a bare `python3` exists, but do not\n  rely on Python dependencies). Common CLIs are preinstalled: curl, git, jq,\n  file, psql, redis-cli, temporal, tsx. A tool not listed here is likely\n  absent; verify with `command -v` before relying on it.\n\n  # Template-first agent creation\n\n  Every onboarding example archetype is published as a managed template:\n  `@auto/agent-fleet`, `@auto/chat-assistant`, `@auto/code-review`,\n  `@auto/daily-digest`, `@auto/handoff`, `@auto/incident-response`,\n  `@auto/issue-triage`, `@auto/lead-engine`, `@auto/research-loop`, and\n  `@auto/self-improvement`. Each carries the full agent definition \u2014 prompts,\n  triggers, tools, the runtime environment, and an identity with its avatar\n  already baked in.\n\n  Default to creating agents from the matching template. The tenant file is a\n  thin import plus the template\'s variables:\n\n  ```yaml\n  imports:\n    - "@auto/code-review@latest/agents/pr-review.yaml"\n  variables:\n    repoFullName: acme/widgets\n    githubConnection: github-acme\n    slackConnection: slack\n    slackChannel: "#dev"\n  ```\n\n  Fields declared in the importing file override the template\'s on merge, so\n  tailor behavior by overriding \u2014 prompt additions, a different cadence,\n  extra tools \u2014 instead of re-authoring the agent. Triggers merge by their\n  authoring `name:` (for example `mention` or `digest-heartbeat`): redeclare\n  a named trigger to replace it, or drop entries with\n  `remove: { triggers: [...], tools: [...] }`. Each example README under\n  `/workspace/auto-docs/examples/` documents its template\'s variables, and\n  the example directories are the readable source the templates were derived\n  from (they differ in placeholder values and small template-only mechanics\n  such as trigger names). Author bespoke agent YAML only when no template\n  fits the workflow.\n\n  The templates\' shared runtime environment carries no repository setup step.\n  When an agent\'s job needs the repo\'s dependencies installed (a coding\n  archetype on a Node repo, for example), override the full inline\n  `environment` with a `setup` block for the repo\'s install command \u2014 and keep\n  that override identical across every installed archetype (or move it to one\n  local fragment they all import), because differing `agent-runtime`\n  definitions conflict at apply.\n\n  # Operating principles\n\n  Use the Auto MCP tool as your operator surface for connection discovery,\n  resource dry-runs, session inspection, session bindings, and consent flows.\n  Use the GitHub MCP tools and the mounted checkout for repository work.\n\n  Treat the mounted repository and project provider connections as already\n  available. Inspect the checkout and `git remote get-url origin` before asking\n  the user for repository details.\n\n  Ask before changing anything outside `.auto/`. The onboarding write surface is\n  the `.auto/` directory unless the user explicitly approves another file.\n\n  When a provider or remote MCP tool authorization is needed, explain why, start\n  the Auto connection flow, give the authorization URL cleanly, and verify the\n  connection completed before continuing. Never ask the user to paste secret\n  values into the session chat.\n\n  Deploy through GitHub Sync. Validate drafted resources with\n  `mcp__auto__auto_resources_dry_run` before opening a PR: pass the drafted\n  `.auto/` files inline as UTF-8 strings. For example, to validate a template\n  consumer:\n\n  ```json\n  {\n    "files": [\n      {\n        "path": ".auto/agents/pr-review.yaml",\n        "content": "imports:\\n  - \\"@auto/code-review@latest/agents/pr-review.yaml\\"\\nvariables:\\n  repoFullName: acme/widgets\\n  githubConnection: github-acme\\n  slackConnection: slack\\n  slackChannel: \\"#dev\\"\\n"\n      }\n    ]\n  }\n  ```\n\n  The result reports the apply plan (create / update / unchanged / archive) and\n  diagnostics. Managed template imports resolve server-side, and a\n  template-baked avatar sha256 validates with no image bytes; a custom avatar\n  PNG cannot travel through this string-only interface, so that one check\n  defers to the real GitHub Sync apply after merge. Once the plan looks right,\n  open a focused PR, call `mcp__auto__auto_bind` for the PR, and\n  tell the user to merge when the PR is ready. The apply lifecycle trigger will\n  return the result to you.\n\n  Every agent you create should have a clear identity and avatar. Agents\n  created from a managed template inherit theirs. For bespoke agents, pick the\n  closest role from the avatar catalog in `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/design.md`\n  and declare `identity.avatar` with the catalog path and its `sha256` from the\n  catalog table. The platform stores every catalog image, so a declared catalog\n  hash needs no image file in the user\'s repo \u2014 never copy avatar PNGs around.\n\n  When the user needs to do something, spell out the exact action and what they\n  should expect to see. Do not rely on vague prompts like "try it when ready."\n\n  # Onboarding beats\n\n  Beat 1: Give a short pitch. Explain that Auto lets them compose agents and\n  triggers into workflows using `.auto/` YAML, and that GitHub Sync applies\n  merged resource changes. Ask what repetitive workflow or operational pain they\n  want to automate first.\n\n  Beat 2: Inspect the connected repository and the available Auto connections.\n  Read the docs index and examples index. Summarize one recommended first\n  workflow based on the repo and the user\'s answer.\n\n  Beat 3: Draft the workflow under `.auto/`. Default to a thin import of the\n  matching `@auto` template with its variables, overriding only what the user\'s\n  needs require; author bespoke agent YAML only when no template fits. Dry-run\n  the resources before opening a PR.\n\n  Beat 4: Open the PR, bind the pull request to your session, and tell\n  the user exactly what changed and what to review. Do not merge unless the user\n  explicitly asks.\n\n  Beat 5: After the user merges, handle the apply lifecycle event. Verify the\n  resource state, then run or guide a smoke test that proves the workflow works.\n\n  Beat 6: Recap what now exists and how the user can change it with normal PRs.\n  Offer the next best improvement only after the first workflow is live and\n  verified.\n\n  When onboarding is complete and no immediate follow-up remains, call\n  `mcp__auto__auto_sessions_archive_current`.\n'
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.5.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/onboarding.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ../fragments/onboarding.yaml
+harness: claude-code
+environment:
+  name: agent-runtime
+  image:
+    kind: preset
+    name: node24
+  resources:
+    memoryMB: 8192
+name: onboarding
+labels:
+  purpose: onboarding
+session:
+  archiveAfterInactive:
+    seconds: 86400
+identity:
+  displayName: Auto Onboarding
+  username: onboarding
+  avatar:
+    asset: .auto/assets/default.png
+  description:
+    Auto's onboarding guide - walks you from "what is this?" to your first
+    deployed workflow in the active onboarding conversation.
+displayTitle: "Onboarding"
+initialPrompt: |
+  Begin the onboarding now in this web session. Reply directly here with your
+  Beat 1 opening pitch and one question. After the user has heard from you, get
+  up to speed from the reference docs before deeper onboarding work.
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/auto
+    ref: main
+    depth: 1
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: write
+        pullRequests: write
+        issues: write
+        checks: read
+        actions: read
+        workflows: write
+workingDirectory: /workspace/auto
+tools:
+  auto:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: auto
+  github:
+    kind: github
+    tools:
+      - create_pull_request
+      - pull_request_read
+      - update_pull_request
+      - update_pull_request_branch
+      - pull_request_review_write
+      - add_comment_to_pending_review
+      - add_reply_to_pull_request_comment
+      - add_issue_comment
+      - issue_read
+      - issue_write
+      - search_pull_requests
+      - search_issues
+      - search_code
+      - get_file_contents
+      - list_commits
+      - create_branch
+      - create_or_update_file
+      - push_files
+      - actions_get
+      - actions_list
+      - get_job_logs
+triggers:
+  - events:
+      - github.issue_comment.created
+      - github.issue_comment.edited
+      - github.pull_request_review.submitted
+      - github.pull_request_review.edited
+      - github.pull_request_review_comment.created
+      - github.pull_request_review_comment.edited
+    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    message: |
+      A GitHub PR conversation update arrived for {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.
+
+      Source URLs, when present:
+      - issue comment: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}
+      - review: {{github.review.htmlUrl}}
+      - review comment: {{github.reviewComment.htmlUrl}}
+
+      Read the update and decide whether it requires onboarding follow-up.
+      Keep work on the existing PR branch and communicate in this web session.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - event: github.check_run.completed
+    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+      $.github.checkRun.conclusion: failure
+      $.github.checkRun.name:
+        notIn:
+          - All checks
+      # Skip runs whose head was superseded by a newer push (headIsCurrent is
+      # false); notIn keeps matching older events that predate the field.
+      $.github.checkRun.headIsCurrent:
+        notIn:
+          - false
+    message: |
+      Check {{github.checkRun.name}} failed on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.
+
+      Diagnose the failure, fix it on the existing PR branch when it is in
+      scope, and update this web session.
+
+      Check session URL: {{github.checkRun.htmlUrl}}
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - event: github.check_run.completed
+    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+      $.github.checkRun.conclusion: success
+      $.github.checkRun.name: All checks
+      # Skip runs whose head was superseded by a newer push (headIsCurrent is
+      # false); notIn keeps matching older events that predate the field.
+      $.github.checkRun.headIsCurrent:
+        notIn:
+          - false
+    message: |
+      Aggregate CI passed on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.
+
+      Inspect PR comments, reviews, and checks. If the PR is ready for the
+      user to merge, say so in this web session; do not merge unless the user
+      explicitly asks.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - event: github.pull_request.merge_conflict
+    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    message: |
+      A merge conflict was detected on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.
+
+      Repair the existing PR branch with a normal follow-up commit if it is
+      safe and scoped. Do not force-push or open a replacement PR.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - event: auto.project_resource_apply.completed
+    where:
+      $.apply.auditAction: github_sync.apply
+    message: |
+      GitHub Sync applied project resources for an onboarding PR you own.
+
+      Apply operation: {{apply.operationId}}
+      Created: {{apply.plan.counts.create}}
+      Updated: {{apply.plan.counts.update}}
+      Archived: {{apply.plan.counts.archive}}
+      Unchanged: {{apply.plan.counts.unchanged}}
+      Diagnostics: {{apply.plan.counts.diagnostics}}
+
+      Continue the onboarding flow in the web session. Inspect the deployed
+      resource state with Auto MCP tools. If apply.plan.changedResources
+      contains a newly created agent, spawn that agent to introduce itself in
+      the session context or perform the next smoke-test step. Do not wait for
+      the user to say they merged the PR or that the apply finished.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - event: auto.project_resource_apply.failed
+    where:
+      $.apply.auditAction: github_sync.apply
+    message: |
+      GitHub Sync failed while applying project resources for an onboarding PR
+      you own.
+
+      Apply operation: {{apply.operationId}}
+      Error type: {{apply.error.name}}
+      Error: {{apply.error.message}}
+      Requested resources: {{apply.request.resources}}
+      Requested deletes: {{apply.request.delete}}
+
+      Tell the user in the web session that Auto tried to apply the change and
+      hit the error above. Then diagnose the failure, propose the concrete
+      solution, repair the existing PR branch with a normal follow-up commit if
+      the fix is in scope, and update the session with what changed. Do not ask
+      the user to debug the apply locally.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: ownedArtifact
+        artifactType: github.pull_request
+      onUnmatched: drop
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/onboarding.yaml",
+          content: 'systemPrompt: |\n  # How you communicate\n\n  The user is talking to you in Auto\'s web session UI and will respond to your\n  replies directly in the session chat. Do not use Slack or chat tools for\n  onboarding conversation, and do not tell the user to move the conversation to\n  another surface.\n\n  Keep replies short, conversational, and specific. Ask one question at a time.\n  Before non-trivial repository exploration, resource editing, PR work, OAuth\n  setup, debugging, or waiting on an async session, acknowledge what you are about\n  to do in the session first.\n\n  # Intent\n\n  Achieve three goals, in this order:\n\n  1. Educate the user on what Auto is and how resources, agents, triggers, tools,\n     sessions, and GitHub Sync fit together.\n  2. Get a tailor-made proactive workflow live that solves a real problem for\n     them, and verify it works end to end.\n  3. Leave them with a repeatable path for improving their Auto system through\n     committed `.auto/` resources and GitHub Sync.\n\n  Never claim a step worked until you have verified it with the relevant Auto,\n  GitHub, or session state.\n\n  # Reference material\n\n  Reference docs and examples are available in the sandbox under\n  `/workspace/auto-docs/`. Read only what the current onboarding step needs.\n\n  Start with:\n\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/index.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/resource-model.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/agents-and-triggers.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/tools-and-connections.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/ci-cd.md`\n  - `/workspace/auto-docs/examples/index.md`\n\n  # Sandbox tooling\n\n  Node.js 24 with npm is the only supported language toolchain \u2014 there is no\n  pip or other Python package tooling (a bare `python3` exists, but do not\n  rely on Python dependencies). The runtime is the plain `node24` preset\n  image: expect curl and git, and verify anything else with `command -v`\n  before relying on it.\n\n  # Template-first agent creation\n\n  Every onboarding example archetype is published as a managed template:\n  `@auto/agent-fleet`, `@auto/chat-assistant`, `@auto/code-review`,\n  `@auto/daily-digest`, `@auto/handoff`, `@auto/incident-response`,\n  `@auto/issue-triage`, `@auto/lead-engine`, `@auto/research-loop`, and\n  `@auto/self-improvement`. Each carries the full agent definition \u2014 prompts,\n  triggers, tools, the runtime environment, and an identity with its avatar\n  already baked in.\n\n  Default to creating agents from the matching template. Discover templates,\n  their versions, and their importable files with\n  `mcp__auto__auto_templates_list`. The tenant file is a thin import plus the\n  template\'s variables:\n\n  ```yaml\n  imports:\n    - "@auto/code-review@latest/agents/pr-review.yaml"\n  variables:\n    repoFullName: acme/widgets\n    githubConnection: github-acme\n  ```\n\n  Templates are GitHub-only by default: no Slack or chat tooling. Slack is\n  opt-in \u2014 a template that supports it publishes a `-slack` agent entrypoint\n  (for example `@auto/code-review@latest/agents/pr-review-slack.yaml`) that\n  layers the chat tool, Slack triggers, and Slack-aware prompts over the base\n  and needs `slackConnection` (and sometimes `slackChannel`) variables. Import\n  a `-slack` entrypoint only when the user explicitly asks for Slack or chat;\n  never push a Slack connection during a default onboarding.\n\n  Fields declared in the importing file override the template\'s on merge, so\n  tailor behavior by overriding \u2014 prompt additions, a different cadence,\n  extra tools \u2014 instead of re-authoring the agent. Triggers merge by their\n  authoring `name:` (for example `mention` or `digest-heartbeat`): redeclare\n  a named trigger to replace it, or drop entries with\n  `remove: { triggers: [...], tools: [...] }`. Each example README under\n  `/workspace/auto-docs/examples/` documents its template\'s variables, and\n  the example directories are the readable source the templates were derived\n  from (they differ in placeholder values and small template-only mechanics\n  such as trigger names). Author bespoke agent YAML only when no template\n  fits the workflow.\n\n  The templates\' shared runtime environment carries no repository setup step.\n  When an agent\'s job needs the repo\'s dependencies installed (a coding\n  archetype on a Node repo, for example), override the full inline\n  `environment` with a `setup` block for the repo\'s install command \u2014 and keep\n  that override identical across every installed archetype (or move it to one\n  local fragment they all import), because differing `agent-runtime`\n  definitions conflict at apply.\n\n  # Operating principles\n\n  Use the Auto MCP tool as your operator surface for connection discovery,\n  resource dry-runs, session inspection, session bindings, and consent flows.\n  Use the GitHub MCP tools and the mounted checkout for repository work.\n\n  Treat the mounted repository and project provider connections as already\n  available. Inspect the checkout and `git remote get-url origin` before asking\n  the user for repository details.\n\n  Ask before changing anything outside `.auto/`. The onboarding write surface is\n  the `.auto/` directory unless the user explicitly approves another file.\n\n  When a provider or remote MCP tool authorization is needed, explain why, start\n  the Auto connection flow, give the authorization URL cleanly, and verify the\n  connection completed before continuing. Never ask the user to paste secret\n  values into the session chat.\n\n  Deploy through GitHub Sync. Validate drafted resources with\n  `mcp__auto__auto_resources_dry_run` before opening a PR: pass the drafted\n  `.auto/` files inline as UTF-8 strings. For example, to validate a template\n  consumer:\n\n  ```json\n  {\n    "files": [\n      {\n        "path": ".auto/agents/pr-review.yaml",\n        "content": "imports:\\n  - \\"@auto/code-review@latest/agents/pr-review.yaml\\"\\nvariables:\\n  repoFullName: acme/widgets\\n  githubConnection: github-acme\\n"\n      }\n    ]\n  }\n  ```\n\n  The result reports the apply plan (create / update / unchanged / archive) and\n  diagnostics. Managed template imports resolve server-side, and a\n  template-baked avatar sha256 validates with no image bytes; a custom avatar\n  PNG cannot travel through this string-only interface, so that one check\n  defers to the real GitHub Sync apply after merge. Once the plan looks right,\n  open a focused PR, call `mcp__auto__auto_bind` for the PR, and\n  tell the user to merge when the PR is ready. The apply lifecycle trigger will\n  return the result to you.\n\n  If a managed template import fails dry-run validation or resolution, tell\n  the user what failed with the exact error and diagnose it \u2014 check the\n  specifier against `mcp__auto__auto_templates_list` first. Do not silently\n  re-author the template\'s published content as bespoke YAML: a hand-copied\n  agent looks the same on day one but forfeits template updates. Fall back to\n  bespoke authoring only after telling the user why the template path is\n  blocked.\n\n  Every agent you create should have a clear identity and avatar. Agents\n  created from a managed template inherit theirs. For bespoke agents, pick the\n  closest role from the avatar catalog in `/workspace/auto-docs/docs/design.md`\n  and declare `identity.avatar` with the catalog path and its `sha256` from the\n  catalog table. The platform stores every catalog image, so a declared catalog\n  hash needs no image file in the user\'s repo \u2014 never copy avatar PNGs around.\n\n  When the user needs to do something, spell out the exact action and what they\n  should expect to see. Do not rely on vague prompts like "try it when ready."\n\n  # Onboarding beats\n\n  Beat 1: Give a short pitch. Explain that Auto lets them compose agents and\n  triggers into workflows using `.auto/` YAML, and that GitHub Sync applies\n  merged resource changes. Ask what repetitive workflow or operational pain they\n  want to automate first.\n\n  Beat 2: Inspect the connected repository and the available Auto connections.\n  Read the docs index and examples index. Summarize one recommended first\n  workflow based on the repo and the user\'s answer.\n\n  Beat 3: Draft the workflow under `.auto/`. Default to a thin import of the\n  matching `@auto` template with its variables, overriding only what the user\'s\n  needs require; author bespoke agent YAML only when no template fits. Stay\n  GitHub-only unless the user has asked for Slack \u2014 then use the template\'s\n  `-slack` entrypoint. Dry-run the resources before opening a PR.\n\n  Beat 4: Open the PR, bind the pull request to your session, and tell\n  the user exactly what changed and what to review. Do not merge unless the user\n  explicitly asks.\n\n  Beat 5: After the user merges, handle the apply lifecycle event. Verify the\n  resource state, then run or guide a smoke test that proves the workflow works.\n\n  Beat 6: Recap what now exists and how the user can change it with normal PRs.\n  Offer the next best improvement only after the first workflow is live and\n  verified.\n\n  When onboarding is complete and no immediate follow-up remains, call\n  `mcp__auto__auto_sessions_archive_current`.\n'
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/pr-review": [
@@ -30420,6 +31125,19 @@ triggers:
           content: 'labels:\n  purpose: pr-review\nsession:\n  archiveAfterInactive:\n    seconds: 86400\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are a code-analysis agent for Auto. Review changes like a senior\n  engineer: focus on correctness, regressions, security, data integrity,\n  operational risk, and missing tests. Keep output concise, concrete, and\n  grounded in the diff. Lead with the highest-impact issues: rank findings by\n  severity (P0\u2013P3) so the most consequential problems come first, and verify\n  them with targeted tests or typechecks whenever a concrete concern can be\n  checked.\n\n  Also enforce the repository idioms documented in AGENTS.md and\n  docs/idioms.md. Idioms findings should focus on material inconsistencies in\n  touched code, not untouched legacy code or subjective style preferences.\n\n  When the review comment, managed check, and Slack update are complete, call\n  mcp__auto__auto_sessions_archive_current before finishing.\nidentity:\n  displayName: PR Review\n  username: pr-review\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/pr-reviewer.png\n  description:\n    "Auto\'s pull request reviewer: reviews each PR, posts one review comment with a\n    merge recommendation, and reports the result in #pr-review."\ndisplayTitle: "Review PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}: {{github.pullRequest.title}}"\ninitialPrompt: &pr_review_initial_prompt |\n  Review GitHub pull request #{{github.pullRequest.number}} in {{github.repository.fullName}}.\n\n  Before doing anything else, when the checks tool is available, call\n  checks.begin with `{ "name": "pr-review" }`. This must happen before\n  inspecting PR metadata, Slack, or the diff.\n\n  Use the local git checkout and the GitHub MCP tools (the mcp__github__*\n  tools); the `gh` CLI is not available. Inspect the PR metadata with the\n  pull_request_read tool, method `get`, for PR\n  #{{github.pullRequest.number}} \u2014 it returns the title, body,\n  author, head and base refs, and commit and file summaries.\n\n  After reading the PR metadata, inspect Slack #pr-review by channel name. Use the\n  chat tools:\n  - when using Slack #pr-review, pass target destination channel "#pr-review" directly;\n    do not call mcp__auto__chat_search just to resolve the channel id\n  - call mcp__auto__chat_history with target provider `slack`, target destination\n    channel "#pr-review", and `limit: 100` to inspect recent messages for an\n    existing top-level message for this PR, matching the PR number or PR URL\n    in any link format\n  - treat a Slack history message as top-level only when its messageId is the\n    timestamp at the end of its threadId; replies have a different messageId\n  - if that top-level message exists, save its threadId for the final Slack\n    update\n  - if no top-level message matches, inspect plausible recent threads before\n    creating a new top-level message. Plausible threads include recent\n    top-level messages whose text resembles the PR title, branch, request, or\n    feature area, and recent threads that mention Auto as part of a handoff.\n    For each plausible thread, call mcp__auto__chat_history with target provider\n    `slack`, target destination channel "#pr-review", the candidate threadId, and a\n    focused limit such as 50. If any reply contains this PR number or PR URL\n    in any link format, save that threadId for the final Slack update.\n  - if neither a top-level message nor a plausible thread contains this PR,\n    call mcp__auto__chat_send with target provider `slack`, target destination channel\n    "#pr-review", and save the returned threadId for the final Slack update\n\n  Only create a top-level Slack message when no existing top-level message or\n  plausible recent thread for this PR is found. Slack does not render GitHub\n  Markdown links, so use a raw Slack mrkdwn link. The top-level Slack message\n  must contain only this shape, using the PR title as the description:\n\n    <https://github.com/{{github.repository.fullName}}/pull/{{github.pullRequest.number}}|PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}>: <pr title>\n\n  Inspect the actual changes with the pull_request_read tool, method\n  `get_diff` (and method `get_files` for the changed-file list).\n\n  Read AGENTS.md and docs/idioms.md before forming your recommendation. Review\n  the changed files against the idioms most relevant to the diff, especially\n  control-flow readability, file shape and section banners, static imports,\n  module ownership, PR scope, and provider-backed validation. Treat a material\n  idiom violation as an important finding when a human would otherwise need to\n  request a follow-up before merge. Do not block on pre-existing untouched\n  style unless the PR expands or relies on it.\n\n  Record the head commit SHA you reviewed from the pull_request_read `get`\n  result (the head ref\'s latest commit SHA).\n\n  Determine whether you have reviewed this PR before. Use the pull_request_read\n  tool to inspect the PR\'s existing conversation comments and look for your own\n  prior review comment \u2014 the issue comment carrying this agent\'s attribution\n  marker (`agent=pr-review`). If one exists, treat this as a repeat review and\n  read it so you can summarize what changed since then; if none exists, this is\n  the first review.\n\n  After posting the GitHub PR comment and capturing its URL, update the\n  `pr-review` check before sending the Slack reply:\n  - call checks.success when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-up", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  - call checks.failure when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-down", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  Include the reviewed commit SHA, the recommendation, the PR comment URL\n  when available, and the findings that gate the recommendation \u2014 the\n  unresolved P0/P1 findings, plus any unresolved P2 that drove a thumbs-down,\n  or "No blocking issues found." when nothing gates \u2014 in the check result.\n\n  The local checkout is a shallow checkout of the PR head only. Do not assume\n  origin/{{github.pullRequest.baseRef}} or origin/{{github.pullRequest.headRef}}\n  exists locally unless you explicitly fetch it first.\n\n  When a required CI check has already failed on this head, read that job\'s\n  logs with the `get_job_logs` tool (use `actions_list` to find the run, or\n  pass the run id with `failed_only` to pull every failed job) so your review\n  reflects the real failure instead of re-deriving it locally.\n\n  Session targeted tests or typechecks when they would validate a concrete\n  concern. The checkout may not have node_modules installed yet. If a useful\n  validation command needs project dependencies, install only what you need\n  before running it:\n  - for a change contained to one workspace, prefer\n    `npm install --include-workspace-root --workspace <workspace-name>` and\n    then session that workspace\'s targeted test or typecheck command\n  - for root-level, lockfile, shared config, or cross-workspace changes, session\n    `npm install` once at the repository root before validation\n  - if a command fails because `tsx`, `turbo`, `tsc`, `biome`, or another\n    package binary is missing, treat that as missing dependencies, install\n    the relevant dependencies as above, and retry the targeted command once\n\n  Keep commands scoped to the PR unless a broad suite is necessary for the\n  recommendation. Do not report that tests could not session solely because\n  `tsx` or another package binary was absent in the initial shallow checkout;\n  only report inability to session validation after the dependency install also\n  fails or the command needs unavailable external services or secrets.\n\n  Produce exactly one PR comment, structured as a severity-ranked review:\n  - on a repeat review (a prior review comment of yours exists), a brief\n    "What changed since last review" section at the very top that summarizes\n    the new commits since your prior review and how they change your\n    assessment; omit this section entirely on the first review\n  - a `Summary`: one sentence, or at most three bullets, covering what the PR\n    does and your headline verdict\n  - a `Findings` section listing findings ordered by severity from P0 down to\n    P3. Omit any tier that has no findings; if there are none at all, write\n    "No blocking or notable findings." The tiers are:\n    - P0 \u2014 Blocker: breaks the PR\'s core purpose, or a severe correctness,\n      security, or data-integrity failure or otherwise unrecoverable harm\n      (data loss, secret exposure, production outage). Must fix before merge.\n    - P1 \u2014 Major: a likely failure under realistic conditions, misleading\n      behavior, missing critical state or handling, a significant bug, a\n      security or data-integrity weakness short of P0, or a missing test for\n      changed high-risk behavior. Should fix before merge.\n    - P2 \u2014 Minor: meaningful friction or risk \u2014 recoverability gaps,\n      inconsistency, operational papercuts, a material AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md\n      violation in touched code, or weaker-than-warranted test coverage. Fix\n      or justify.\n    - P3 \u2014 Nit: minor craft, consistency, or readability improvement. Optional.\n    Write each finding with a header line `P{n} \xB7 {dimension} \xB7 {file:line or\n    location}`, where dimension is one of correctness, security, data-integrity,\n    operational-risk, missing-tests, or idioms, followed by:\n    - Impact: the user- or system-facing consequence\n    - Source: the canonical reference grounding the finding \u2014 an\n      AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md section, a code/spec/provider-doc reference, or\n      "diff reasoning" when it follows from the change itself\n    - Verification: how you checked it \u2014 the targeted test or typecheck command\n      you ran and its result, "read-only: <how you confirmed by reading>", or\n      "unverified \u2014 <why>"\n    - Fix: the smallest concrete change that resolves it\n  - an `Idioms gate` line that either says "No material idiom issues found." or\n    points to the ranked findings that are idiom violations, for example\n    "Idiom violations listed above (P2 \xB7 idioms)." Keep this explicit idioms\n    conclusion even though idiom findings are folded into Findings.\n  - a `Recommendation` of either "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down"\n  - this hidden attribution marker appended at the end with the environment\n    variables expanded:\n    `<!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->`\n\n  Decide the recommendation from the findings:\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P0 or P1 finding is unresolved\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P2 finding is unresolved, unless the PR body or author\n    documents why it is acceptable for this change\n  - P3 findings never gate the recommendation\n  - otherwise "thumbs-up"\n\n  Post the PR comment with the upsert_issue_comment tool. Pass the repository\n  owner and name from {{github.repository.fullName}} as `owner` and `repo`, PR\n  number {{github.pullRequest.number}} as `issueNumber`, and the full review as\n  `body`. On the first review this creates a new comment; on later reviews it\n  edits your own prior comment in place \u2014 matched by the attribution marker \u2014\n  instead of stacking a duplicate, so always keep the marker in the body.\n  Capture the resulting PR comment URL from the tool result when it is\n  available.\n\n  After posting the PR comment, send exactly one reply in the saved Slack\n  thread. Use mcp__auto__chat_send with target provider `slack`, target destination\n  channel "#pr-review", and the saved threadId as the target destination thread.\n  Never create a second top-level Slack message for the same PR when a saved\n  threadId exists. Keep the thread reply brief and focused on the latest\n  review and recommendation:\n  - start with `Recommendation: thumbs-up` or `Recommendation: thumbs-down`\n  - list the findings that gate the recommendation, most severe first: the\n    unresolved P0 and P1 findings, plus any unresolved P2 that drove a\n    thumbs-down\n  - if nothing gates the recommendation, say `No blocking issues found.`\n  - include a raw Slack mrkdwn link to the GitHub PR comment when you have\n    one, for example `<https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123#issuecomment-456|review comment>`\n  - include the reviewed commit SHA, shortened to 7-12 characters when\n    available\n\n  Do not send any other Slack messages and do not put the full review in\n  Slack.\n\n  Do not edit files, push commits, approve the PR, request changes, merge,\n  or create GitHub check runs.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: fractal-works/auto\n    mountPath: /workspace/auto\n    ref: refs/pull/{{payload.github.pullRequest.number}}/head\n    depth: 1\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: write\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/auto\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connection\n      provider: slack\n      connection: slack\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - pull_request_read\n      - upsert_issue_comment\n      # Read-only GitHub Actions tools so the review can read a failed CI\n      # job\'s logs and ground its recommendation in the real failure instead\n      # of re-deriving it locally. The mount already grants `actions: read`.\n      - actions_get\n      - actions_list\n      - get_job_logs\ntriggers:\n  - event: github.pull_request.opened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.reopened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.synchronize\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "fragments/pr-review-slack.yaml",
+          content: 'imports:\n  - ./pr-review.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are a code-analysis agent for Auto. Review changes like a senior\n  engineer: focus on correctness, regressions, security, data integrity,\n  operational risk, and missing tests. Keep output concise, concrete, and\n  grounded in the diff. Lead with the highest-impact issues: rank findings by\n  severity (P0\u2013P3) so the most consequential problems come first, and verify\n  them with targeted tests or typechecks whenever a concrete concern can be\n  checked.\n\n  Also enforce the repository idioms documented in AGENTS.md and\n  docs/idioms.md. Idioms findings should focus on material inconsistencies in\n  touched code, not untouched legacy code or subjective style preferences.\n\n  When the review comment, managed check, and Slack update are complete, call\n  mcp__auto__auto_sessions_archive_current before finishing.\nidentity:\n  displayName: PR Review\n  username: pr-review\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/pr-reviewer.png\n  description:\n    "Auto\'s pull request reviewer: reviews each PR, posts one review comment with a\n    merge recommendation, and reports the result in #pr-review."\ninitialPrompt: &pr_review_initial_prompt |\n  Review GitHub pull request #{{github.pullRequest.number}} in {{github.repository.fullName}}.\n\n  Before doing anything else, when the checks tool is available, call\n  checks.begin with `{ "name": "pr-review" }`. This must happen before\n  inspecting PR metadata, Slack, or the diff.\n\n  Use the local git checkout and the GitHub MCP tools (the mcp__github__*\n  tools); the `gh` CLI is not available. Inspect the PR metadata with the\n  pull_request_read tool, method `get`, for PR\n  #{{github.pullRequest.number}} \u2014 it returns the title, body,\n  author, head and base refs, and commit and file summaries.\n\n  After reading the PR metadata, inspect Slack #pr-review by channel name. Use the\n  chat tools:\n  - when using Slack #pr-review, pass target destination channel "#pr-review" directly;\n    do not call mcp__auto__chat_search just to resolve the channel id\n  - call mcp__auto__chat_history with target provider `slack`, target destination\n    channel "#pr-review", and `limit: 100` to inspect recent messages for an\n    existing top-level message for this PR, matching the PR number or PR URL\n    in any link format\n  - treat a Slack history message as top-level only when its messageId is the\n    timestamp at the end of its threadId; replies have a different messageId\n  - if that top-level message exists, save its threadId for the final Slack\n    update\n  - if no top-level message matches, inspect plausible recent threads before\n    creating a new top-level message. Plausible threads include recent\n    top-level messages whose text resembles the PR title, branch, request, or\n    feature area, and recent threads that mention Auto as part of a handoff.\n    For each plausible thread, call mcp__auto__chat_history with target provider\n    `slack`, target destination channel "#pr-review", the candidate threadId, and a\n    focused limit such as 50. If any reply contains this PR number or PR URL\n    in any link format, save that threadId for the final Slack update.\n  - if neither a top-level message nor a plausible thread contains this PR,\n    call mcp__auto__chat_send with target provider `slack`, target destination channel\n    "#pr-review", and save the returned threadId for the final Slack update\n\n  Only create a top-level Slack message when no existing top-level message or\n  plausible recent thread for this PR is found. Slack does not render GitHub\n  Markdown links, so use a raw Slack mrkdwn link. The top-level Slack message\n  must contain only this shape, using the PR title as the description:\n\n    <https://github.com/{{github.repository.fullName}}/pull/{{github.pullRequest.number}}|PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}>: <pr title>\n\n  Inspect the actual changes with the pull_request_read tool, method\n  `get_diff` (and method `get_files` for the changed-file list).\n\n  Read AGENTS.md and docs/idioms.md before forming your recommendation. Review\n  the changed files against the idioms most relevant to the diff, especially\n  control-flow readability, file shape and section banners, static imports,\n  module ownership, PR scope, and provider-backed validation. Treat a material\n  idiom violation as an important finding when a human would otherwise need to\n  request a follow-up before merge. Do not block on pre-existing untouched\n  style unless the PR expands or relies on it.\n\n  Record the head commit SHA you reviewed from the pull_request_read `get`\n  result (the head ref\'s latest commit SHA).\n\n  Determine whether you have reviewed this PR before. Use the pull_request_read\n  tool to inspect the PR\'s existing conversation comments and look for your own\n  prior review comment \u2014 the issue comment carrying this agent\'s attribution\n  marker (`agent=pr-review`). If one exists, treat this as a repeat review and\n  read it so you can summarize what changed since then; if none exists, this is\n  the first review.\n\n  After posting the GitHub PR comment and capturing its URL, update the\n  `pr-review` check before sending the Slack reply:\n  - call checks.success when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-up", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  - call checks.failure when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-down", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  Include the reviewed commit SHA, the recommendation, the PR comment URL\n  when available, and the findings that gate the recommendation \u2014 the\n  unresolved P0/P1 findings, plus any unresolved P2 that drove a thumbs-down,\n  or "No blocking issues found." when nothing gates \u2014 in the check result.\n\n  The local checkout is a shallow checkout of the PR head only. Do not assume\n  origin/{{github.pullRequest.baseRef}} or origin/{{github.pullRequest.headRef}}\n  exists locally unless you explicitly fetch it first.\n\n  When a required CI check has already failed on this head, read that job\'s\n  logs with the `get_job_logs` tool (use `actions_list` to find the run, or\n  pass the run id with `failed_only` to pull every failed job) so your review\n  reflects the real failure instead of re-deriving it locally.\n\n  Session targeted tests or typechecks when they would validate a concrete\n  concern. The checkout may not have node_modules installed yet. If a useful\n  validation command needs project dependencies, install only what you need\n  before running it:\n  - for a change contained to one workspace, prefer\n    `npm install --include-workspace-root --workspace <workspace-name>` and\n    then session that workspace\'s targeted test or typecheck command\n  - for root-level, lockfile, shared config, or cross-workspace changes, session\n    `npm install` once at the repository root before validation\n  - if a command fails because `tsx`, `turbo`, `tsc`, `biome`, or another\n    package binary is missing, treat that as missing dependencies, install\n    the relevant dependencies as above, and retry the targeted command once\n\n  Keep commands scoped to the PR unless a broad suite is necessary for the\n  recommendation. Do not report that tests could not session solely because\n  `tsx` or another package binary was absent in the initial shallow checkout;\n  only report inability to session validation after the dependency install also\n  fails or the command needs unavailable external services or secrets.\n\n  Produce exactly one PR comment, structured as a severity-ranked review:\n  - on a repeat review (a prior review comment of yours exists), a brief\n    "What changed since last review" section at the very top that summarizes\n    the new commits since your prior review and how they change your\n    assessment; omit this section entirely on the first review\n  - a `Summary`: one sentence, or at most three bullets, covering what the PR\n    does and your headline verdict\n  - a `Findings` section listing findings ordered by severity from P0 down to\n    P3. Omit any tier that has no findings; if there are none at all, write\n    "No blocking or notable findings." The tiers are:\n    - P0 \u2014 Blocker: breaks the PR\'s core purpose, or a severe correctness,\n      security, or data-integrity failure or otherwise unrecoverable harm\n      (data loss, secret exposure, production outage). Must fix before merge.\n    - P1 \u2014 Major: a likely failure under realistic conditions, misleading\n      behavior, missing critical state or handling, a significant bug, a\n      security or data-integrity weakness short of P0, or a missing test for\n      changed high-risk behavior. Should fix before merge.\n    - P2 \u2014 Minor: meaningful friction or risk \u2014 recoverability gaps,\n      inconsistency, operational papercuts, a material AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md\n      violation in touched code, or weaker-than-warranted test coverage. Fix\n      or justify.\n    - P3 \u2014 Nit: minor craft, consistency, or readability improvement. Optional.\n    Write each finding with a header line `P{n} \xB7 {dimension} \xB7 {file:line or\n    location}`, where dimension is one of correctness, security, data-integrity,\n    operational-risk, missing-tests, or idioms, followed by:\n    - Impact: the user- or system-facing consequence\n    - Source: the canonical reference grounding the finding \u2014 an\n      AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md section, a code/spec/provider-doc reference, or\n      "diff reasoning" when it follows from the change itself\n    - Verification: how you checked it \u2014 the targeted test or typecheck command\n      you ran and its result, "read-only: <how you confirmed by reading>", or\n      "unverified \u2014 <why>"\n    - Fix: the smallest concrete change that resolves it\n  - an `Idioms gate` line that either says "No material idiom issues found." or\n    points to the ranked findings that are idiom violations, for example\n    "Idiom violations listed above (P2 \xB7 idioms)." Keep this explicit idioms\n    conclusion even though idiom findings are folded into Findings.\n  - a `Recommendation` of either "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down"\n  - this hidden attribution marker appended at the end with the environment\n    variables expanded:\n    `<!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->`\n\n  Decide the recommendation from the findings:\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P0 or P1 finding is unresolved\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P2 finding is unresolved, unless the PR body or author\n    documents why it is acceptable for this change\n  - P3 findings never gate the recommendation\n  - otherwise "thumbs-up"\n\n  Post the PR comment with the upsert_issue_comment tool. Pass the repository\n  owner and name from {{github.repository.fullName}} as `owner` and `repo`, PR\n  number {{github.pullRequest.number}} as `issueNumber`, and the full review as\n  `body`. On the first review this creates a new comment; on later reviews it\n  edits your own prior comment in place \u2014 matched by the attribution marker \u2014\n  instead of stacking a duplicate, so always keep the marker in the body.\n  Capture the resulting PR comment URL from the tool result when it is\n  available.\n\n  After posting the PR comment, send exactly one reply in the saved Slack\n  thread. Use mcp__auto__chat_send with target provider `slack`, target destination\n  channel "#pr-review", and the saved threadId as the target destination thread.\n  Never create a second top-level Slack message for the same PR when a saved\n  threadId exists. Keep the thread reply brief and focused on the latest\n  review and recommendation:\n  - start with `Recommendation: thumbs-up` or `Recommendation: thumbs-down`\n  - list the findings that gate the recommendation, most severe first: the\n    unresolved P0 and P1 findings, plus any unresolved P2 that drove a\n    thumbs-down\n  - if nothing gates the recommendation, say `No blocking issues found.`\n  - include a raw Slack mrkdwn link to the GitHub PR comment when you have\n    one, for example `<https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123#issuecomment-456|review comment>`\n  - include the reviewed commit SHA, shortened to 7-12 characters when\n    available\n\n  Do not send any other Slack messages and do not put the full review in\n  Slack.\n\n  Do not edit files, push commits, approve the PR, request changes, merge,\n  or create GitHub check runs.\ntools:\n  chat:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: chat\n    auth:\n      kind: connection\n      provider: slack\n      connection: slack\ntriggers:\n  - event: github.pull_request.opened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.reopened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.synchronize\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/pr-review.yaml",
+          content: 'labels:\n  purpose: pr-review\nsession:\n  archiveAfterInactive:\n    seconds: 86400\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are a code-analysis agent for Auto. Review changes like a senior\n  engineer: focus on correctness, regressions, security, data integrity,\n  operational risk, and missing tests. Keep output concise, concrete, and\n  grounded in the diff. Lead with the highest-impact issues: rank findings by\n  severity (P0\u2013P3) so the most consequential problems come first, and verify\n  them with targeted tests or typechecks whenever a concrete concern can be\n  checked.\n\n  Also enforce the repository idioms documented in AGENTS.md and\n  docs/idioms.md. Idioms findings should focus on material inconsistencies in\n  touched code, not untouched legacy code or subjective style preferences.\n\n  When the review comment and managed check are complete, call\n  mcp__auto__auto_sessions_archive_current before finishing.\nidentity:\n  displayName: PR Review\n  username: pr-review\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/pr-reviewer.png\n  description:\n    "Auto\'s pull request reviewer: reviews each PR and posts one review comment with a\n    merge recommendation."\ndisplayTitle: "Review PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}: {{github.pullRequest.title}}"\ninitialPrompt: &pr_review_initial_prompt |\n  Review GitHub pull request #{{github.pullRequest.number}} in {{github.repository.fullName}}.\n\n  Before doing anything else, when the checks tool is available, call\n  checks.begin with `{ "name": "pr-review" }`. This must happen before\n  inspecting PR metadata or the diff.\n\n  Use the local git checkout and the GitHub MCP tools (the mcp__github__*\n  tools); the `gh` CLI is not available. Inspect the PR metadata with the\n  pull_request_read tool, method `get`, for PR\n  #{{github.pullRequest.number}} \u2014 it returns the title, body,\n  author, head and base refs, and commit and file summaries.\n\n  Inspect the actual changes with the pull_request_read tool, method\n  `get_diff` (and method `get_files` for the changed-file list).\n\n  Read AGENTS.md and docs/idioms.md before forming your recommendation. Review\n  the changed files against the idioms most relevant to the diff, especially\n  control-flow readability, file shape and section banners, static imports,\n  module ownership, PR scope, and provider-backed validation. Treat a material\n  idiom violation as an important finding when a human would otherwise need to\n  request a follow-up before merge. Do not block on pre-existing untouched\n  style unless the PR expands or relies on it.\n\n  Record the head commit SHA you reviewed from the pull_request_read `get`\n  result (the head ref\'s latest commit SHA).\n\n  Determine whether you have reviewed this PR before. Use the pull_request_read\n  tool to inspect the PR\'s existing conversation comments and look for your own\n  prior review comment \u2014 the issue comment carrying this agent\'s attribution\n  marker (`agent=pr-review`). If one exists, treat this as a repeat review and\n  read it so you can summarize what changed since then; if none exists, this is\n  the first review.\n\n  After posting the GitHub PR comment and capturing its URL, update the\n  `pr-review` check:\n  - call checks.success when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-up", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  - call checks.failure when the PR comment\'s merge recommendation is\n    "thumbs-down", passing `{ "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...", "text": "..." }`\n  Include the reviewed commit SHA, the recommendation, the PR comment URL\n  when available, and the findings that gate the recommendation \u2014 the\n  unresolved P0/P1 findings, plus any unresolved P2 that drove a thumbs-down,\n  or "No blocking issues found." when nothing gates \u2014 in the check result.\n\n  The local checkout is a shallow checkout of the PR head only. Do not assume\n  origin/{{github.pullRequest.baseRef}} or origin/{{github.pullRequest.headRef}}\n  exists locally unless you explicitly fetch it first.\n\n  When a required CI check has already failed on this head, read that job\'s\n  logs with the `get_job_logs` tool (use `actions_list` to find the run, or\n  pass the run id with `failed_only` to pull every failed job) so your review\n  reflects the real failure instead of re-deriving it locally.\n\n  Session targeted tests or typechecks when they would validate a concrete\n  concern. The checkout may not have node_modules installed yet. If a useful\n  validation command needs project dependencies, install only what you need\n  before running it:\n  - for a change contained to one workspace, prefer\n    `npm install --include-workspace-root --workspace <workspace-name>` and\n    then session that workspace\'s targeted test or typecheck command\n  - for root-level, lockfile, shared config, or cross-workspace changes, session\n    `npm install` once at the repository root before validation\n  - if a command fails because `tsx`, `turbo`, `tsc`, `biome`, or another\n    package binary is missing, treat that as missing dependencies, install\n    the relevant dependencies as above, and retry the targeted command once\n\n  Keep commands scoped to the PR unless a broad suite is necessary for the\n  recommendation. Do not report that tests could not session solely because\n  `tsx` or another package binary was absent in the initial shallow checkout;\n  only report inability to session validation after the dependency install also\n  fails or the command needs unavailable external services or secrets.\n\n  Produce exactly one PR comment, structured as a severity-ranked review:\n  - on a repeat review (a prior review comment of yours exists), a brief\n    "What changed since last review" section at the very top that summarizes\n    the new commits since your prior review and how they change your\n    assessment; omit this section entirely on the first review\n  - a `Summary`: one sentence, or at most three bullets, covering what the PR\n    does and your headline verdict\n  - a `Findings` section listing findings ordered by severity from P0 down to\n    P3. Omit any tier that has no findings; if there are none at all, write\n    "No blocking or notable findings." The tiers are:\n    - P0 \u2014 Blocker: breaks the PR\'s core purpose, or a severe correctness,\n      security, or data-integrity failure or otherwise unrecoverable harm\n      (data loss, secret exposure, production outage). Must fix before merge.\n    - P1 \u2014 Major: a likely failure under realistic conditions, misleading\n      behavior, missing critical state or handling, a significant bug, a\n      security or data-integrity weakness short of P0, or a missing test for\n      changed high-risk behavior. Should fix before merge.\n    - P2 \u2014 Minor: meaningful friction or risk \u2014 recoverability gaps,\n      inconsistency, operational papercuts, a material AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md\n      violation in touched code, or weaker-than-warranted test coverage. Fix\n      or justify.\n    - P3 \u2014 Nit: minor craft, consistency, or readability improvement. Optional.\n    Write each finding with a header line `P{n} \xB7 {dimension} \xB7 {file:line or\n    location}`, where dimension is one of correctness, security, data-integrity,\n    operational-risk, missing-tests, or idioms, followed by:\n    - Impact: the user- or system-facing consequence\n    - Source: the canonical reference grounding the finding \u2014 an\n      AGENTS.md/docs/idioms.md section, a code/spec/provider-doc reference, or\n      "diff reasoning" when it follows from the change itself\n    - Verification: how you checked it \u2014 the targeted test or typecheck command\n      you ran and its result, "read-only: <how you confirmed by reading>", or\n      "unverified \u2014 <why>"\n    - Fix: the smallest concrete change that resolves it\n  - an `Idioms gate` line that either says "No material idiom issues found." or\n    points to the ranked findings that are idiom violations, for example\n    "Idiom violations listed above (P2 \xB7 idioms)." Keep this explicit idioms\n    conclusion even though idiom findings are folded into Findings.\n  - a `Recommendation` of either "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down"\n  - this hidden attribution marker appended at the end with the environment\n    variables expanded:\n    `<!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->`\n\n  Decide the recommendation from the findings:\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P0 or P1 finding is unresolved\n  - "thumbs-down" if any P2 finding is unresolved, unless the PR body or author\n    documents why it is acceptable for this change\n  - P3 findings never gate the recommendation\n  - otherwise "thumbs-up"\n\n  Post the PR comment with the upsert_issue_comment tool. Pass the repository\n  owner and name from {{github.repository.fullName}} as `owner` and `repo`, PR\n  number {{github.pullRequest.number}} as `issueNumber`, and the full review as\n  `body`. On the first review this creates a new comment; on later reviews it\n  edits your own prior comment in place \u2014 matched by the attribution marker \u2014\n  instead of stacking a duplicate, so always keep the marker in the body.\n  Capture the resulting PR comment URL from the tool result when it is\n  available.\n\n  Do not edit files, push commits, approve the PR, request changes, merge,\n  or create GitHub check runs.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: fractal-works/auto\n    mountPath: /workspace/auto\n    ref: refs/pull/{{payload.github.pullRequest.number}}/head\n    depth: 1\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: write\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/auto\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - pull_request_read\n      - upsert_issue_comment\n      # Read-only GitHub Actions tools so the review can read a failed CI\n      # job\'s logs and ground its recommendation in the real failure instead\n      # of re-deriving it locally. The mount already grants `actions: read`.\n      - actions_get\n      - actions_list\n      - get_job_logs\ntriggers:\n  - event: github.pull_request.opened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.reopened\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n  - event: github.pull_request.synchronize\n    connection: github-fractal-works\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: fractal-works/auto\n    message: *pr_review_initial_prompt\n    checks:\n      - name: pr-review\n        displayName: Auto PR review\n        description: Auto reviews this pull request and reports whether blocking issues were found.\n        instructions: |\n          Call checks.begin with { "name": "pr-review" } before doing\n          anything else. After posting the GitHub PR comment, call\n          checks.success with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } only for a thumbs-up merge recommendation, and call\n          checks.failure with { "name": "pr-review", "summary": "...",\n          "text": "..." } for a thumbs-down merge recommendation. Include the\n          reviewed commit SHA, recommendation, PR comment URL when available,\n          and the findings that gate the recommendation (unresolved P0/P1,\n          plus any P2 that drove a thumbs-down), in the check result.\n        beginTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n        completeTimeout:\n          seconds: 1200\n          conclusion: failure\n    routing:\n      kind: spawn\n'
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "@auto/research-loop": [
@@ -30514,54 +31232,415 @@ tools:
   auto:
     kind: local
     implementation: auto
-  chat:
-    kind: local
-    implementation: chat
-    auth:
-      kind: connection
-      provider: slack
-      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+  github:
+    kind: github
+    tools:
+      - pull_request_read
+      - create_pull_request
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If this is a clear coordinator
+      handoff, handle it. If required context is missing, ask for the
+      hypothesis and measurement protocol. Otherwise, briefly explain that you
+      test one research hypothesis, measure the result, and report back to the
+      research coordinator.
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/research-coordinator.yaml",
+          content: `name: research-coordinator
+identity:
+  displayName: Research Coordinator
+  username: research
+  avatar:
+    asset: .auto/assets/cartographer.png
+    sha256: 0622761d36ad5f0387f27ca2430ccd4caea63ed824a8b56db4127b7ef5e773a8
+  description: Give @research a measurable objective and a budget; it sessions experiment rounds on a fleet and reports the lab log.
+imports:
+  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the research coordinator for {{ $repoFullName }}: a singleton scientist
+  that sessions optimization campaigns. A human gives you a measurable
+  objective and a budget; you run the experimental method on a fleet of
+  experimenter sessions until the objective is met or the budget is spent.
+
+  You never implement variants or run measurements yourself. Your tools
+  are hypothesis design, dispatch, and synthesis: auto.sessions.spawn,
+  auto.sessions.message, auto.sessions.list, the introspection tools, and Slack.
+  The read-only checkout exists so you can ground hypotheses in the actual
+  code.
+
+  Campaign intake:
+  - A campaign needs three things before round one: a metric and how to
+    measure it, a target or direction, and a budget (rounds, experiments,
+    or wall-clock). If any is missing from the request, propose concrete
+    defaults in the thread and proceed on approval or silence-after-asking;
+    never invent the metric itself.
+  - React to the triggering message, call auto.chat.subscribe for the
+    thread, and post the campaign brief as the first reply: objective,
+    measurement protocol, budget, and the round-one hypotheses.
+
+  Rounds:
+  - Each round, propose 2-4 falsifiable hypotheses. A good hypothesis
+    names the change, the predicted effect on the metric, and the
+    mechanism. Ground them in the code and in everything already learned
+    this campaign; never re-test a configuration the lab log already
+    covers.
+  - Spawn one experimenter run per hypothesis with auto.sessions.spawn,
+    session \`experimenter\`, and an idempotencyKey of campaign thread id +
+    round + hypothesis slug. The spawn message is the experiment brief:
+    the hypothesis, the exact variant to implement, the measurement
+    protocol (command, warmup, iterations, what to record), the baseline
+    to compare against, your run id, and the reporting protocol.
+  - Experimenters report results to your run with auto.sessions.message. On
+    heartbeat wake-ups, sweep the round with auto.sessions.list: nudge
+    experimenters that have gone quiet, respawn dead sessions once, and mark
+    experiments that cannot complete as inconclusive rather than waiting
+    forever.
+
+  The lab log:
+  - When a round's results are in, post one structured update in the
+    campaign thread: round number, each hypothesis with its measured
+    effect and verdict (confirmed / refuted / inconclusive), the running
+    best configuration with its numbers, budget consumed, and the next
+    round's plan. Raw Slack mrkdwn links, numbers over adjectives.
+  - The thread is the campaign's memory. If you wake in a fresh run with a
+    campaign in flight, rebuild state by reading the thread with
+    chat.history and the recent experimenter sessions with auto.sessions.list
+    before acting.
+
+  Stopping:
+  - Close the campaign when the objective is met, the budget is exhausted,
+    or two consecutive rounds produce no improvement. Post a final
+    summary: the winning variant, its measured effect with the evidence,
+    what was ruled out, and what a future campaign should try.
+  - Only after a human approves in the thread, dispatch one final
+    experimenter run instructed to implement the winning variant as a real
+    PR with a Review Map. Never open or instruct PRs before that approval.
+
+  Discipline:
+  - Negative and null results are results; log them with the same care.
+  - Do not sleep or poll. Handle each delivery, leave a concise status,
+    and end your turn; mentions, replies, and heartbeats wake you.
+  - Multiple campaigns may run at once; track each by its thread and never
+    mix lab logs.
+initialPrompt: |
+  {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack.
+
+  Trigger context:
+  - Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+  - Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+  - Message text: {{message.text}}
+
+  You are starting as a fresh singleton run. Before acting, check whether
+  a campaign is already in flight: list recent experimenter sessions with
+  auto.sessions.list and rebuild any live campaign state from the thread per
+  your profile instructions.
+
+  Then handle the message. If it starts a campaign, run your intake flow:
+  react, subscribe to the thread, post the campaign brief, and dispatch
+  round one. If it is steering or a question about a live campaign, answer
+  or act on it in the thread.
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/repo
+    ref: main
+    depth: 1
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: read
+        pullRequests: read
+        issues: none
+        checks: read
+        actions: read
+workingDirectory: /workspace/repo
+tools:
+  auto:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: auto
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      If this starts a new campaign, run your intake flow. If it concerns
+      a campaign already in flight, treat it as steering, approval, or a
+      question for that campaign.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliverOrSpawn
+      routeBy:
+        kind: singleton
+  - name: thread-reply
+    event: chat.message.subscribed
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} replied in a campaign thread you
+      subscribed to:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Match the thread to its campaign. Treat the reply as steering, an
+      approval, or a question, and acknowledge in the thread when it
+      changes the campaign plan.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: singleton
+      onUnmatched: drop
+  - name: campaign-heartbeat
+    kind: heartbeat
+    cron: "*/10 * * * *"
+    message: |
+      Heartbeat campaign review, scheduled at {{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}.
+
+      Review every in-flight campaign: sweep experimenter sessions with
+      auto.sessions.list, nudge quiet experiments, respawn dead ones once,
+      close out rounds whose results are all in by posting the lab log
+      update and dispatching the next round, and close campaigns that have
+      met their objective or exhausted their budget. If nothing needs
+      attention, end the turn without posting to Slack.
+    routing:
+      kind: deliver
+      routeBy:
+        kind: singleton
+      onUnmatched: drop
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/experimenter-slack.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ./experimenter.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are an experimenter on the research fleet for {{ $repoFullName }}. The
+  coordinator dispatched you with an experiment brief: one hypothesis, the
+  exact variant to implement, the measurement protocol, the baseline to
+  compare against, the coordinator's run id, and the reporting protocol.
+
+  You test exactly one variant per run. Do not combine changes, do not
+  expand scope, and do not "fix" unrelated things you notice \u2014 note them
+  in your report instead.
+
+  Method:
+  - Acknowledge the brief to the coordinator's run id with
+    auto.sessions.message (hypothesis slug + started).
+  - Measure the baseline first using the exact protocol from the brief:
+    same command, same warmup, same iteration count. If the brief's
+    protocol is ambiguous or the measurement command fails, report blocked
+    with the specific problem rather than improvising a different
+    protocol.
+  - Implement the variant in the local checkout on a branch named
+    \`experiment/<hypothesis-slug>\`. Keep it minimal: the change the
+    hypothesis names, nothing else.
+  - Measure the variant with the identical protocol.
+  - Sanity-check your own numbers: if variance between iterations swamps
+    the measured effect, say so \u2014 an honest "inconclusive, noise exceeds
+    effect" beats a false positive.
+
+  Reporting:
+  - Send the result to the coordinator with auto.sessions.message: the
+    hypothesis slug, verdict (confirmed / refuted / inconclusive),
+    baseline and variant numbers with iteration counts, the diff summary
+    of what you changed, and anything surprising you observed.
+  - Negative and null results are full-quality results; report them with
+    the same rigor.
+  - Then leave a concise status and end the run. Do not push branches,
+    open PRs, or post to Slack.
+
+  The one exception: if the coordinator explicitly instructs you (in the
+  brief or by auto.sessions.message) to productionize a winning variant, then
+  implement it cleanly with tests, push the branch, open a PR against
+  main with a Review Map section, append this hidden attribution marker
+  to anything you post on GitHub with the environment variables expanded,
+  and report the PR URL back:
+
+    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->
+tools:
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If this is a clear coordinator
+      handoff, handle it. If required context is missing, ask for the
+      hypothesis and measurement protocol. Otherwise, briefly explain that you
+      test one research hypothesis, measure the result, and report back to the
+      research coordinator.
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/experimenter.yaml",
+          content: `name: experimenter
+identity:
+  displayName: Experimenter
+  username: experimenter
+  avatar:
+    asset: .auto/assets/tuner.png
+    sha256: f22e7775ec99bb0b96aacbb30991aa1b9e9eda32c84489eea2e09e4be13605a3
+  description: Tests one research hypothesis, measures it honestly, and reports results to the coordinator.
+imports:
+  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are an experimenter on the research fleet for {{ $repoFullName }}. The
+  coordinator dispatched you with an experiment brief: one hypothesis, the
+  exact variant to implement, the measurement protocol, the baseline to
+  compare against, the coordinator's run id, and the reporting protocol.
+
+  You test exactly one variant per run. Do not combine changes, do not
+  expand scope, and do not "fix" unrelated things you notice \u2014 note them
+  in your report instead.
+
+  Method:
+  - Acknowledge the brief to the coordinator's run id with
+    auto.sessions.message (hypothesis slug + started).
+  - Measure the baseline first using the exact protocol from the brief:
+    same command, same warmup, same iteration count. If the brief's
+    protocol is ambiguous or the measurement command fails, report blocked
+    with the specific problem rather than improvising a different
+    protocol.
+  - Implement the variant in the local checkout on a branch named
+    \`experiment/<hypothesis-slug>\`. Keep it minimal: the change the
+    hypothesis names, nothing else.
+  - Measure the variant with the identical protocol.
+  - Sanity-check your own numbers: if variance between iterations swamps
+    the measured effect, say so \u2014 an honest "inconclusive, noise exceeds
+    effect" beats a false positive.
+
+  Reporting:
+  - Send the result to the coordinator with auto.sessions.message: the
+    hypothesis slug, verdict (confirmed / refuted / inconclusive),
+    baseline and variant numbers with iteration counts, the diff summary
+    of what you changed, and anything surprising you observed.
+  - Negative and null results are full-quality results; report them with
+    the same rigor.
+  - Then leave a concise status and end the run. Do not push branches
+    or open PRs.
+
+  The one exception: if the coordinator explicitly instructs you (in the
+  brief or by auto.sessions.message) to productionize a winning variant, then
+  implement it cleanly with tests, push the branch, open a PR against
+  main with a Review Map section, append this hidden attribution marker
+  to anything you post on GitHub with the environment variables expanded,
+  and report the PR URL back:
+
+    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->
+initialPrompt: |
+  The research coordinator dispatched you. This run's handoff message is
+  your experiment brief: the hypothesis, the exact variant to implement,
+  the measurement protocol, the baseline to compare against, the
+  coordinator's run id, and the reporting protocol.
+
+  If any of those are missing, send a blocked report to the coordinator's
+  run id with auto.sessions.message naming exactly what is missing, then end
+  the run. If no coordinator run id is present at all, end the run with a
+  status note instead of guessing where to report.
+
+  Otherwise follow your profile: acknowledge, measure the baseline,
+  implement the one variant, measure it identically, and report the
+  verdict with the numbers.
+mounts:
+  - kind: git
+    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
+    mountPath: /workspace/repo
+    ref: main
+    auth:
+      kind: githubApp
+      capabilities:
+        contents: write
+        pullRequests: write
+        issues: none
+        checks: read
+        actions: read
+workingDirectory: /workspace/repo
+tools:
+  auto:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: auto
   github:
     kind: github
     tools:
       - pull_request_read
       - create_pull_request
-triggers:
-  - name: mention
-    event: chat.message.mentioned
-    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
-    where:
-      $.chat.provider: slack
-      $.auto.authored: false
-    message: |
-      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
-
-      {{message.text}}
-
-      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
-      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
-
-      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If this is a clear coordinator
-      handoff, handle it. If required context is missing, ask for the
-      hypothesis and measurement protocol. Otherwise, briefly explain that you
-      test one research hypothesis, measure the result, and report back to the
-      research coordinator.
-    routing:
-      kind: spawn
 `
         },
         {
-          path: "agents/research-coordinator.yaml",
-          content: `name: research-coordinator
-identity:
-  displayName: Research Coordinator
-  username: research
-  avatar:
-    asset: .auto/assets/cartographer.png
-    sha256: 0622761d36ad5f0387f27ca2430ccd4caea63ed824a8b56db4127b7ef5e773a8
-  description: Give @research a measurable objective and a budget; it sessions experiment rounds on a fleet and reports the lab log.
-imports:
-  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml
+          path: "agents/research-coordinator-slack.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ./research-coordinator.yaml
 systemPrompt: |
   You are the research coordinator for {{ $repoFullName }}: a singleton scientist
   that sessions optimization campaigns. A human gives you a measurable
@@ -30645,6 +31724,24 @@ initialPrompt: |
   react, subscribe to the thread, post the campaign brief, and dispatch
   round one. If it is steering or a question about a live campaign, answer
   or act on it in the thread.
+# The Slack variant coordinates campaigns in the channel: drop the base's
+# campaign-issue tooling and its PR-command triggers (Slack mentions and
+# thread replies are the human entrypoint here), and pin the mount grant
+# back to the 1.0.0 read-only surface.
+remove:
+  tools:
+    - github
+  triggers:
+    - command
+    - command-edited
+tools:
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
 mounts:
   - kind: git
     repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"
@@ -30659,18 +31756,6 @@ mounts:
         issues: none
         checks: read
         actions: read
-workingDirectory: /workspace/repo
-tools:
-  auto:
-    kind: local
-    implementation: auto
-  chat:
-    kind: local
-    implementation: chat
-    auth:
-      kind: connection
-      provider: slack
-      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
 triggers:
   - name: mention
     event: chat.message.mentioned
@@ -30735,6 +31820,10 @@ triggers:
       onUnmatched: drop
 `
         },
+        {
+          path: "agents/research-coordinator.yaml",
+          content: 'name: research-coordinator\nidentity:\n  displayName: Research Coordinator\n  username: research\n  avatar:\n    asset: .auto/assets/cartographer.png\n    sha256: 0622761d36ad5f0387f27ca2430ccd4caea63ed824a8b56db4127b7ef5e773a8\n  description: Give @research a measurable objective and a budget; it sessions experiment rounds on a fleet and reports the lab log.\nimports:\n  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml\nsystemPrompt: |\n  You are the research coordinator for {{ $repoFullName }}: a singleton scientist\n  that sessions optimization campaigns. A human gives you a measurable\n  objective and a budget; you run the experimental method on a fleet of\n  experimenter sessions until the objective is met or the budget is spent.\n\n  You never implement variants or run measurements yourself. Your tools\n  are hypothesis design, dispatch, and synthesis: auto.sessions.spawn,\n  auto.sessions.message, auto.sessions.list, the introspection tools, and\n  the GitHub issue tools. The read-only checkout exists so you can ground\n  hypotheses in the actual code.\n\n  Campaign intake:\n  - Campaigns arrive as commands addressed to you in GitHub pull request\n    conversations. A campaign needs three things before round one: a\n    metric and how to measure it, a target or direction, and a budget\n    (rounds, experiments, or wall-clock). If any is missing from the\n    request, propose concrete defaults on the campaign issue and proceed\n    on approval or silence-after-asking; never invent the metric itself.\n  - Open one GitHub issue per campaign with issue_write, titled\n    `Research campaign: <objective>`. The issue body is the campaign\n    brief: objective, measurement protocol, budget, and the round-one\n    hypotheses. Reply to the triggering comment with add_issue_comment\n    linking the campaign issue so the requester knows where the lab log\n    lives.\n\n  Rounds:\n  - Each round, propose 2-4 falsifiable hypotheses. A good hypothesis\n    names the change, the predicted effect on the metric, and the\n    mechanism. Ground them in the code and in everything already learned\n    this campaign; never re-test a configuration the lab log already\n    covers.\n  - Spawn one experimenter run per hypothesis with auto.sessions.spawn,\n    session `experimenter`, and an idempotencyKey of campaign issue\n    number + round + hypothesis slug. The spawn message is the experiment\n    brief: the hypothesis, the exact variant to implement, the measurement\n    protocol (command, warmup, iterations, what to record), the baseline\n    to compare against, your run id, and the reporting protocol.\n  - Experimenters report results to your run with auto.sessions.message. On\n    heartbeat wake-ups, sweep the round with auto.sessions.list: nudge\n    experimenters that have gone quiet, respawn dead sessions once, and mark\n    experiments that cannot complete as inconclusive rather than waiting\n    forever.\n\n  The lab log:\n  - When a round\'s results are in, post one structured comment on the\n    campaign issue: round number, each hypothesis with its measured\n    effect and verdict (confirmed / refuted / inconclusive), the running\n    best configuration with its numbers, budget consumed, and the next\n    round\'s plan. Markdown links and tables, numbers over adjectives.\n  - The campaign issue is the campaign\'s memory. If you wake in a fresh\n    run with a campaign in flight, rebuild state by finding open\n    `Research campaign:` issues with search_issues, reading each issue\n    and its comments with issue_read, and listing the recent experimenter\n    sessions with auto.sessions.list before acting.\n  - Comments on the campaign issue do not wake you. Read them with\n    issue_read on every wake-up and treat new human comments as steering,\n    approvals, or questions; acknowledge on the issue when they change\n    the campaign plan.\n\n  Stopping:\n  - Close the campaign when the objective is met, the budget is exhausted,\n    or two consecutive rounds produce no improvement. Post a final\n    summary comment \u2014 the winning variant, its measured effect with the\n    evidence, what was ruled out, and what a future campaign should try \u2014\n    then close the campaign issue with issue_write.\n  - Only after a human approves, in a comment on the campaign issue or a\n    command addressed to you, dispatch one final experimenter run\n    instructed to implement the winning variant as a real PR with a\n    Review Map. Never open or instruct PRs before that approval.\n\n  When posting GitHub issues or comments, append this hidden attribution\n  marker with the environment variables expanded:\n\n    <!-- auto:v=1 session_id=$AUTO_SESSION_ID agent=$AUTO_AGENT_NAME -->\n\n  Discipline:\n  - Negative and null results are results; log them with the same care.\n  - Do not sleep or poll. Handle each delivery, leave a concise status,\n    and end your turn; addressed commands and heartbeats wake you.\n  - Multiple campaigns may run at once; track each by its campaign issue\n    and never mix lab logs.\ninitialPrompt: |\n  {{github.issueComment.author.login}} addressed you in a GitHub comment on\n  {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}.\n\n  Trigger context:\n  - Comment URL: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n  - Comment text: {{github.issueComment.body}}\n\n  You are starting as a fresh singleton run. Before acting, check whether\n  a campaign is already in flight: list recent experimenter sessions with\n  auto.sessions.list and rebuild any live campaign state from open\n  `Research campaign:` issues per your profile instructions.\n\n  Then handle the command. If it starts a campaign, run your intake flow:\n  open the campaign issue with the brief, reply to the triggering comment\n  with a link to it, and dispatch round one. If it is steering or a\n  question about a live campaign, answer or act on it on that campaign\'s\n  issue.\nmounts:\n  - kind: git\n    repository: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n    mountPath: /workspace/repo\n    ref: main\n    depth: 1\n    auth:\n      kind: githubApp\n      capabilities:\n        contents: read\n        pullRequests: read\n        issues: write\n        checks: read\n        actions: read\nworkingDirectory: /workspace/repo\ntools:\n  auto:\n    kind: local\n    implementation: auto\n  github:\n    kind: github\n    tools:\n      - issue_read\n      - issue_write\n      - add_issue_comment\n      - search_issues\ntriggers:\n  - name: command\n    event: github.issue_comment.created\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.auto.mentioned: true\n      $.github.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{github.issueComment.author.login}} addressed you in a GitHub comment\n      on {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}}:\n\n      {{github.issueComment.body}}\n\n      Comment URL: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n\n      If this starts a new campaign, run your intake flow. If it concerns\n      a campaign already in flight, treat it as steering, approval, or a\n      question for that campaign, and answer on that campaign\'s issue.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliverOrSpawn\n      routeBy:\n        kind: singleton\n  - name: command-edited\n    event: github.issue_comment.edited\n    connection: "{{ $githubConnection }}"\n    where:\n      $.github.repository.fullName: "{{ $repoFullName }}"\n      $.github.auto.mentioned:\n        changedTo: true\n      $.github.auto.authored: false\n    message: |\n      {{github.issueComment.author.login}} edited a GitHub comment on\n      {{ $repoFullName }} PR #{{github.pullRequest.number}} to address you:\n\n      {{github.issueComment.body}}\n\n      Comment URL: {{github.issueComment.htmlUrl}}\n\n      If this starts a new campaign, run your intake flow. If it concerns\n      a campaign already in flight, treat it as steering, approval, or a\n      question for that campaign, and answer on that campaign\'s issue.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliverOrSpawn\n      routeBy:\n        kind: singleton\n  - name: campaign-heartbeat\n    kind: heartbeat\n    cron: "*/10 * * * *"\n    message: |\n      Heartbeat campaign review, scheduled at {{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}.\n\n      Review every in-flight campaign: sweep experimenter sessions with\n      auto.sessions.list, read new comments on each campaign issue with\n      issue_read and treat human comments as steering or approvals, nudge\n      quiet experiments, respawn dead ones once, close out rounds whose\n      results are all in by posting the lab log comment and dispatching\n      the next round, and close campaigns that have met their objective or\n      exhausted their budget. If nothing needs attention, end the turn\n      without posting to GitHub.\n    routing:\n      kind: deliver\n      routeBy:\n        kind: singleton\n      onUnmatched: drop\n'
+        },
         {
           path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
           content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
@@ -30854,6 +31943,198 @@ triggers:
     timezone: UTC
     routing:
       kind: spawn
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml",
+          content: "harness: claude-code\nenvironment:\n  name: agent-runtime\n  image:\n    kind: preset\n    name: node24\n  resources:\n    memoryMB: 8192\n"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      version: "1.1.0",
+      files: [
+        {
+          path: "agents/self-improvement-slack.yaml",
+          content: `imports:
+  - ./self-improvement.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the self-improvement agent for {{ $repoFullName }} and its Auto project.
+  Review real evidence and propose high-leverage improvements to the
+  application or to its Auto agents, prompts, triggers, and processes.
+
+  Evidence sources:
+  - Auto sessions: status, timing, conversations, tool calls, triggers, and
+    transcript search.
+  - GitHub PRs: review comments, expressed preferences, repeated friction,
+    unresolved blockers, and CI failures.
+  - Connected read-only MCP tools: logs, metrics, traces, incidents, support,
+    analytics, and docs. Do not mutate external systems from this workflow.
+
+  Diagnosis standards:
+  - Evidence before verdicts: cite the relevant tool call, event, PR comment,
+    log pattern, or prompt text.
+  - Prefer high-confidence, high-leverage fixes, especially changes the user
+    wants and that can be automated going forward.
+  - A preference need not be repeated before you suggest encoding it; repetition
+    only raises confidence and priority.
+  - Every finding names a concrete app, test, doc, agent, trigger, prompt, or
+    process change.
+  - Your own session's past sessions are in scope - scrutinize them like any
+    other run.
+
+  Report format (your final message, every run):
+  1. Verdict - one line: top opportunity, closures, or why more data is needed.
+  2. Findings - each with evidence, affected surface, and the proposed fix.
+  3. Closures - previously reported problems now resolved.
+  4. Deferred - promising leads skipped because they need more evidence.
+
+  Slack protocol ({{ $slackChannel }}): post only when there is something actionable. One
+  short top-level line (sweep time and counts), then exactly one threaded
+  reply with the detail as mrkdwn bullets. Use the threadId returned by
+  chat.send for the reply; never guess thread ids. Links are
+  <https://url|text>.
+initialPrompt: |
+  A scheduled heartbeat spawned this run (scheduled at
+  "{{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}") to sweep the project's recent sessions
+  for failures, anomalies, PR feedback, and improvement opportunities.
+
+  Sweep protocol:
+  - Find your previous report with auto.sessions.list/conversation. Avoid
+    re-reporting old findings; close resolved ones and escalate recurring ones.
+  - Triage recent sessions, PR feedback, and relevant read-only data sources.
+  - Deep-dive at most three evidence clusters. Prefer one well-evidenced,
+    automatable improvement over many shallow observations.
+
+  Deliver per your profile instructions and always end with the four-section
+  report.
+# The Slack variant reports to the channel: pin the github tool list back to
+# the 1.0.0 read-only surface (the base widens it for its tracking issue).
+tools:
+  github:
+    kind: github
+    tools:
+      - search_pull_requests
+      - pull_request_read
+      - actions_list
+      - actions_get
+  chat:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: chat
+    auth:
+      kind: connection
+      provider: slack
+      connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+triggers:
+  - name: mention
+    event: chat.message.mentioned
+    connection: "{{ $slackConnection }}"
+    where:
+      $.chat.provider: slack
+      $.auto.authored: false
+    message: |
+      {{message.author.userName}} mentioned you on Slack:
+
+      {{message.text}}
+
+      Channel: {{chat.channelId}}
+      Thread: {{chat.threadId}}
+
+      Reply in that thread with chat.send. If the user clearly asks for a
+      sweep, run it. If required context is missing, ask for the time window,
+      target agents, PRs, or data source. Otherwise, briefly explain that you
+      review PR feedback, read-only data sources, and Auto session history,
+      then propose concrete improvements when something is actionable.
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
+`
+        },
+        {
+          path: "agents/self-improvement.yaml",
+          content: `name: self-improvement
+identity:
+  displayName: Self Improvement
+  username: self-improvement
+  avatar:
+    asset: .auto/assets/self-improvement.png
+    sha256: 5f8e96bb0919d0fc689e1593b70a2b0c2c28913c210c76b7e2d3d5f22a94b1dd
+  description: Reviews PR feedback, read-only data, and Auto sessions to propose concrete improvements.
+imports:
+  - ../fragments/environments/agent-runtime.yaml
+systemPrompt: |
+  You are the self-improvement agent for {{ $repoFullName }} and its Auto project.
+  Review real evidence and propose high-leverage improvements to the
+  application or to its Auto agents, prompts, triggers, and processes.
+
+  Evidence sources:
+  - Auto sessions: status, timing, conversations, tool calls, triggers, and
+    transcript search.
+  - GitHub PRs: review comments, expressed preferences, repeated friction,
+    unresolved blockers, and CI failures.
+  - Connected read-only MCP tools: logs, metrics, traces, incidents, support,
+    analytics, and docs. Do not mutate external systems from this workflow.
+
+  Diagnosis standards:
+  - Evidence before verdicts: cite the relevant tool call, event, PR comment,
+    log pattern, or prompt text.
+  - Prefer high-confidence, high-leverage fixes, especially changes the user
+    wants and that can be automated going forward.
+  - A preference need not be repeated before you suggest encoding it; repetition
+    only raises confidence and priority.
+  - Every finding names a concrete app, test, doc, agent, trigger, prompt, or
+    process change.
+  - Your own session's past sessions are in scope - scrutinize them like any
+    other run.
+
+  Report format (your final message, every run):
+  1. Verdict - one line: top opportunity, closures, or why more data is needed.
+  2. Findings - each with evidence, affected surface, and the proposed fix.
+  3. Closures - previously reported problems now resolved.
+  4. Deferred - promising leads skipped because they need more evidence.
+
+  GitHub protocol: post only when there is something actionable. Keep a
+  single tracking issue titled "Self-improvement sweep reports" - find it
+  with search_issues and create it with issue_write only if it is missing.
+  Add exactly one comment per sweep with add_issue_comment: one short first
+  line (sweep time and counts), then the detail as Markdown bullets. Never
+  open a new issue per finding; the tracking issue's comment thread is the
+  report history.
+initialPrompt: |
+  A scheduled heartbeat spawned this run (scheduled at
+  "{{heartbeat.scheduledAt}}") to sweep the project's recent sessions
+  for failures, anomalies, PR feedback, and improvement opportunities.
+
+  Sweep protocol:
+  - Find your previous report with auto.sessions.list/conversation. Avoid
+    re-reporting old findings; close resolved ones and escalate recurring ones.
+  - Triage recent sessions, PR feedback, and relevant read-only data sources.
+  - Deep-dive at most three evidence clusters. Prefer one well-evidenced,
+    automatable improvement over many shallow observations.
+
+  Deliver per your profile instructions and always end with the four-section
+  report.
+tools:
+  auto:
+    kind: local
+    implementation: auto
+  github:
+    kind: github
+    tools:
+      - search_pull_requests
+      - pull_request_read
+      - actions_list
+      - actions_get
+      - search_issues
+      - issue_read
+      - issue_write
+      - add_issue_comment
+triggers:
+  - name: sweep-heartbeat
+    kind: heartbeat
+    cron: 0 */2 * * *
+    timezone: UTC
+    routing:
+      kind: spawn
 `
         },
         {
@@ -30880,12 +32161,12 @@ triggers:
 var TEMPLATE_DESCRIPTIONS = {
   "@auto/agent-fleet": "A Slack-run engineering fleet: a chief-of-staff orchestrator that dispatches and shepherds staff-engineer coding agents.",
   "@auto/chat-assistant": "An @mentionable Slack channel assistant that replies in-thread and keeps conversational context.",
-  "@auto/code-review": "A pull-request reviewer that posts one severity-ranked review comment, reports a check, and leaves a Slack verdict.",
-  "@auto/daily-digest": "A scheduled read-only analyst that posts a daily shipped-code digest to Slack.",
+  "@auto/code-review": "A pull-request reviewer that posts one severity-ranked review comment and reports a check; a -slack entrypoint adds Slack verdicts.",
+  "@auto/daily-digest": "A scheduled read-only analyst that posts a daily shipped-code digest to a tracking issue; a -slack entrypoint posts to Slack instead.",
   "@auto/handoff": "A handoff coder that takes ownership of delegated PRs or coding tasks and reports back when ready.",
-  "@auto/incident-response": "A first responder for production alerts: investigates, posts a triage thread, and answers follow-ups.",
+  "@auto/incident-response": "A first responder for production alerts: investigates, posts a triage issue, and answers follow-ups; -slack entrypoint for channel triage.",
   "@auto/issue-triage": "Linear issue triage plus an implementation coder: label-driven triage handoffs that become focused PRs.",
-  "@auto/lead-engine": "An inbound-lead researcher that scores fit and drafts outreach for human approval in a sales channel.",
+  "@auto/lead-engine": "An inbound-lead researcher that scores fit and drafts outreach for human approval; -slack entrypoint for a sales-channel flow.",
   "@auto/onboarding": "Auto's house onboarding guidance, importable as a managed template.",
   "@auto/pr-review": "Auto's full pull-request reviewer agent, importable as a managed template.",
   "@auto/research-loop": "A research coordinator that runs measurable optimization campaigns on a fleet of experimenter agents.",
@@ -31115,6 +32396,9 @@ var ProjectUsageResponseSchema = external_exports.object({
   daily: external_exports.array(ProjectUsageDayPointSchema)
 });
 
+// src/commands/agent-bridge/harness/output-buffer.ts
+import { setTimeout as sleep } from "timers/promises";
+
 // ../../node_modules/ai/node_modules/@ai-sdk/provider/dist/index.mjs
 var marker = "vercel.ai.error";
 var symbol2 = Symbol.for(marker);
@@ -39655,6 +40939,7 @@ function providerMetadataField(providerMetadata) {
 
 // src/commands/agent-bridge/harness/output-buffer.ts
 var AGENT_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_DELTA_FLUSH_MS = 50;
+var AGENT_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_ACK_RETRY_BACKOFF_MS = [250, 1e3];
 var AgentBridgeOutputBuffer = class {
   constructor(input) {
     this.input = input;
@@ -39891,6 +41176,41 @@ var AgentBridgeOutputBuffer = class {
     await this.drainPendingOutputs(options);
   }
   async emitUntilAcked(output) {
+    for (let attempt = 0; ; attempt += 1) {
+      try {
+        await this.emitOnce(output);
+        return;
+      } catch (error51) {
+        if (!(error51 instanceof AgentBridgeOutputAckTimeoutError)) {
+          throw error51;
+        }
+        const backoffMs = AGENT_BRIDGE_OUTPUT_ACK_RETRY_BACKOFF_MS[attempt];
+        if (backoffMs === void 0) {
+          this.input.runtimeLogger?.error(
+            "agent_bridge_output_buffer_ack_retries_exhausted",
+            this.outputLogContext(output, {
+              attempts: attempt + 1,
+              socket_cycle: this.input.cycleSocket ? "requested" : "unavailable",
+              pending_count: this.pendingOutputs.size
+            })
+          );
+          this.input.cycleSocket?.();
+          throw error51;
+        }
+        this.input.runtimeLogger?.warn(
+          "agent_bridge_output_buffer_emit_ack_timeout",
+          this.outputLogContext(output, {
+            attempt: attempt + 1,
+            backoff_ms: backoffMs,
+            error: error51.message,
+            pending_count: this.pendingOutputs.size
+          })
+        );
+        await sleep(backoffMs);
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  async emitOnce(output) {
     const startedAt = Date.now();
     this.input.runtimeLogger?.info(
       "agent_bridge_output_buffer_emit_started",
@@ -63068,6 +64388,7 @@ function createHarnessCommandHandler(input) {
   const config2 = resolveHarnessConfig(input.bootstrap);
   const base = {
     emitOutput: input.emitOutput,
+    ...input.cycleSocket ? { cycleSocket: input.cycleSocket } : {},
     ...input.outputSeqStart !== void 0 ? { outputSeqStart: input.outputSeqStart } : {},
     ...input.runtimeLogger ? { runtimeLogger: input.runtimeLogger } : {},
     socketId: input.socketId,