@autocode-cli/autocode 0.1.5 → 0.1.7
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js +27 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/sync.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/sync.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/sync.js +91 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/sync.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/parser.js +2 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/catalog.d.ts +52 -0
- package/dist/core/catalog.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/catalog.js +101 -0
- package/dist/core/catalog.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/column.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dist/core/column.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/column.js +23 -11
- package/dist/core/column.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/pipeline.d.ts +70 -0
- package/dist/core/pipeline.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/pipeline.js +199 -0
- package/dist/core/pipeline.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/sync.d.ts +41 -0
- package/dist/core/sync.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/sync.js +269 -0
- package/dist/core/sync.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/api.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/api.js +330 -6
- package/dist/server/api.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.d.ts +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.js +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.js +2 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.js +1570 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.js +910 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.js +11 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard.js +1 -1
- package/dist/server/dashboard.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/server/index.js +16 -1
- package/dist/server/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/services/claude.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dist/services/claude.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/services/claude.js +8 -1
- package/dist/services/claude.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/types/index.d.ts +67 -0
- package/dist/types/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/templates/catalog.yaml +99 -0
- package/templates/prompts/changelog.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/changelog.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/deploy-prod.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/deploy-prod.fr.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/design.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/design.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/dev.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/dev.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-commit.en.md +35 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-commit.fr.md +35 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-push.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-push.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-tag.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/git-tag.fr.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/qualification.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/qualification.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/retest.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/retest.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/review-code.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/review-code.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/prompts/specification.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/specification.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/prompts/testing-integration.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/testing-integration.fr.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/testing-unit.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/prompts/testing-unit.fr.md +32 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/00_backlog.en.md → prompts/backlog.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/00_backlog.fr.md → prompts/backlog.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/12_deploy-staging.en.md → prompts/deploy-staging.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/12_deploy-staging.fr.md → prompts/deploy-staging.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/14_done.en.md → prompts/done.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/14_done.fr.md → prompts/done.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/02_in-progress.en.md → prompts/in-progress.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/02_in-progress.fr.md → prompts/in-progress.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/01_ready.en.md → prompts/ready.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/01_ready.fr.md → prompts/ready.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/10_retest-cypress.en.md → prompts/retest-cypress.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/10_retest-cypress.fr.md → prompts/retest-cypress.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/09_retest-playwright.en.md → prompts/retest-playwright.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/09_retest-playwright.fr.md → prompts/retest-playwright.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/05_review-best-practices.en.md → prompts/review-best-practices.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/05_review-best-practices.fr.md → prompts/review-best-practices.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/07_review-consistency.en.md → prompts/review-consistency.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/07_review-consistency.fr.md → prompts/review-consistency.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/06_review-no-duplication.en.md → prompts/review-no-duplication.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/06_review-no-duplication.fr.md → prompts/review-no-duplication.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/08_review-security.en.md → prompts/review-security.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/08_review-security.fr.md → prompts/review-security.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/04_testing-cypress.en.md → prompts/testing-cypress.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/04_testing-cypress.fr.md → prompts/testing-cypress.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/03_testing-playwright.en.md → prompts/testing-playwright.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/03_testing-playwright.fr.md → prompts/testing-playwright.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/11_update-docs.en.md → prompts/update-docs.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/11_update-docs.fr.md → prompts/update-docs.fr.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/13_validate-staging.en.md → prompts/validate-staging.en.md} +0 -0
- /package/templates/{columns/13_validate-staging.fr.md → prompts/validate-staging.fr.md} +0 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Design
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Creer le design technique et/ou UX pour la fonctionnalite. Preparer les maquettes, diagrammes ou documents d'architecture selon les besoins.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Revoir les specifications et exigences
|
|
10
|
+
2. Creer des maquettes UI/wireframes si interface utilisateur
|
|
11
|
+
3. Designer l'architecture des composants si applicable
|
|
12
|
+
4. Creer des diagrammes de sequence pour les flux complexes
|
|
13
|
+
5. Definir l'approche de gestion d'etat si applicable
|
|
14
|
+
6. Documenter les decisions de design et compromis
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Design termine : <resume>"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Le design repond a toutes les exigences
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] L'experience utilisateur est consideree
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] La faisabilite technique est confirmee
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Le design est documente/accessible
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Un bon design evite des refactorisations couteuses plus tard. Equilibrer rigueur et pragmatisme selon la complexite du ticket.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Development
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Implement the feature or fix according to specifications. Write clean, maintainable code.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Review specifications and design documents
|
|
10
|
+
2. Create/modify necessary files
|
|
11
|
+
3. Implement the feature following coding standards
|
|
12
|
+
4. Add inline comments for complex logic
|
|
13
|
+
5. Handle edge cases and errors gracefully
|
|
14
|
+
6. Test locally before committing
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push with descriptive message
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Development complete: <files modified>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Feature works as specified
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code follows project conventions
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] No console errors or warnings
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Edge cases handled
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Write code for humans first, computers second. Keep functions small and focused. When in doubt, refactor.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Developpement
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Implementer la fonctionnalite ou le correctif selon les specifications. Ecrire du code propre et maintenable.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Revoir les specifications et documents de design
|
|
10
|
+
2. Creer/modifier les fichiers necessaires
|
|
11
|
+
3. Implementer la fonctionnalite en suivant les standards de code
|
|
12
|
+
4. Ajouter des commentaires pour la logique complexe
|
|
13
|
+
5. Gerer les cas limites et erreurs elegamment
|
|
14
|
+
6. Tester localement avant de commiter
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push avec message descriptif
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Developpement termine : <fichiers modifies>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] La fonctionnalite fonctionne comme specifie
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Le code suit les conventions du projet
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Pas d'erreurs ou warnings console
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Les cas limites sont geres
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Ecrire du code pour les humains d'abord, les machines ensuite. Garder les fonctions petites et focalisees. En cas de doute, refactoriser.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Commit
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Create a clean, atomic git commit for the changes. Follow conventional commit format.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Review all staged changes: `git status`
|
|
10
|
+
2. Ensure only relevant files are staged
|
|
11
|
+
3. Write commit message following format:
|
|
12
|
+
- `feat:` for new features
|
|
13
|
+
- `fix:` for bug fixes
|
|
14
|
+
- `docs:` for documentation
|
|
15
|
+
- `refactor:` for refactoring
|
|
16
|
+
- `test:` for tests
|
|
17
|
+
4. Include ticket key in commit body
|
|
18
|
+
5. Create commit: `git commit -m "<type>: <description>"`
|
|
19
|
+
6. Verify commit: `git log -1`
|
|
20
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
21
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Committed: <commit hash>"`
|
|
22
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Commit message follows convention
|
|
29
|
+
- [ ] Only relevant files included
|
|
30
|
+
- [ ] Commit is atomic (single purpose)
|
|
31
|
+
- [ ] Ticket key referenced
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Notes
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Good commits tell a story. Each commit should be a logical unit of change that could be reverted independently.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Commit
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Creer un commit git propre et atomique pour les changements. Suivre le format conventional commit.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Revoir tous les changements stages : `git status`
|
|
10
|
+
2. S'assurer que seuls les fichiers pertinents sont stages
|
|
11
|
+
3. Ecrire le message de commit suivant le format :
|
|
12
|
+
- `feat:` pour les nouvelles fonctionnalites
|
|
13
|
+
- `fix:` pour les corrections de bugs
|
|
14
|
+
- `docs:` pour la documentation
|
|
15
|
+
- `refactor:` pour le refactoring
|
|
16
|
+
- `test:` pour les tests
|
|
17
|
+
4. Inclure la cle du ticket dans le corps du commit
|
|
18
|
+
5. Creer le commit : `git commit -m "<type>: <description>"`
|
|
19
|
+
6. Verifier le commit : `git log -1`
|
|
20
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
21
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Commite : <hash du commit>"`
|
|
22
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Le message de commit suit la convention
|
|
29
|
+
- [ ] Seuls les fichiers pertinents sont inclus
|
|
30
|
+
- [ ] Le commit est atomique (but unique)
|
|
31
|
+
- [ ] La cle du ticket est referencee
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Notes
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
De bons commits racontent une histoire. Chaque commit doit etre une unite logique de changement qui pourrait etre revertee independamment.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Push
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Push committed changes to the remote repository. Ensure CI/CD pipelines pass.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verify all commits are ready: `git log origin/main..HEAD`
|
|
10
|
+
2. Pull latest changes: `git pull --rebase origin main`
|
|
11
|
+
3. Resolve any conflicts if needed
|
|
12
|
+
4. Push to remote: `git push origin <branch>`
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify push succeeded
|
|
14
|
+
6. Check CI/CD pipeline status
|
|
15
|
+
7. If pipeline fails: fix issues and re-push
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Pushed to <branch>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Changes pushed successfully
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] No merge conflicts
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline passes
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Branch is up to date
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Always pull before push to avoid conflicts. If CI fails, fix it immediately - don't leave the build broken.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Push
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Pousser les changements commites vers le depot distant. S'assurer que les pipelines CI/CD passent.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verifier que tous les commits sont prets : `git log origin/main..HEAD`
|
|
10
|
+
2. Recuperer les derniers changements : `git pull --rebase origin main`
|
|
11
|
+
3. Resoudre les conflits si necessaire
|
|
12
|
+
4. Pousser vers le distant : `git push origin <branche>`
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier que le push a reussi
|
|
14
|
+
6. Verifier le statut du pipeline CI/CD
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si le pipeline echoue : corriger les problemes et re-pousser
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Pousse vers <branche>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Les changements sont pousses avec succes
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Pas de conflits de merge
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Le pipeline CI/CD passe
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] La branche est a jour
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Toujours pull avant push pour eviter les conflits. Si la CI echoue, corriger immediatement - ne pas laisser le build casse.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Tag
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Create a version tag for the release. Follow semantic versioning.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Determine version bump based on changes:
|
|
10
|
+
- MAJOR: breaking changes
|
|
11
|
+
- MINOR: new features (backward compatible)
|
|
12
|
+
- PATCH: bug fixes
|
|
13
|
+
2. Check current version: `git describe --tags --abbrev=0`
|
|
14
|
+
3. Create annotated tag: `git tag -a v<version> -m "<release notes>"`
|
|
15
|
+
4. Push tag: `git push origin v<version>`
|
|
16
|
+
5. Verify tag on remote
|
|
17
|
+
6. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
18
|
+
7. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Tagged: v<version>"`
|
|
19
|
+
8. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Version follows semver
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Tag is annotated with message
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Tag pushed to remote
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Version increment is appropriate
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Semantic versioning: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. Be conservative - when in doubt, use PATCH. Breaking changes require MAJOR bump.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Git Tag
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Creer un tag de version pour la release. Suivre le versionnement semantique.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Determiner l'increment de version selon les changements :
|
|
10
|
+
- MAJOR : changements cassants
|
|
11
|
+
- MINOR : nouvelles fonctionnalites (retrocompatibles)
|
|
12
|
+
- PATCH : corrections de bugs
|
|
13
|
+
2. Verifier la version actuelle : `git describe --tags --abbrev=0`
|
|
14
|
+
3. Creer un tag annote : `git tag -a v<version> -m "<notes de release>"`
|
|
15
|
+
4. Pousser le tag : `git push origin v<version>`
|
|
16
|
+
5. Verifier le tag sur le distant
|
|
17
|
+
6. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
18
|
+
7. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tag cree : v<version>"`
|
|
19
|
+
8. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] La version suit semver
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Le tag est annote avec un message
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Le tag est pousse sur le distant
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] L'increment de version est approprie
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Versionnement semantique : MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. Etre conservateur - en cas de doute, utiliser PATCH. Les changements cassants necessitent un bump MAJOR.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Qualification
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Analyze and qualify the ticket requirement. Ensure the request is clear, feasible, and properly scoped.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Read the ticket description and acceptance criteria
|
|
10
|
+
2. Identify ambiguities or missing information
|
|
11
|
+
3. Assess technical feasibility
|
|
12
|
+
4. Estimate complexity (simple/medium/complex)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Identify dependencies with other tickets or systems
|
|
14
|
+
6. If clarification needed: add comment with questions
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Qualification complete: <summary>"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Requirement is clear and unambiguous
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Technical approach identified
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] No blocking dependencies
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
A well-qualified ticket saves development time. When in doubt, ask for clarification rather than assuming.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Qualification
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Analyser et qualifier le besoin du ticket. S'assurer que la demande est claire, faisable et correctement delimitee.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Lire la description du ticket et les criteres d'acceptation
|
|
10
|
+
2. Identifier les ambiguites ou informations manquantes
|
|
11
|
+
3. Evaluer la faisabilite technique
|
|
12
|
+
4. Estimer la complexite (simple/moyenne/complexe)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Identifier les dependances avec d'autres tickets ou systemes
|
|
14
|
+
6. Si clarification necessaire : ajouter un commentaire avec les questions
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Qualification terminee : <resume>"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Le besoin est clair et sans ambiguite
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Les criteres d'acceptation sont testables
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] L'approche technique est identifiee
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Pas de dependances bloquantes
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Un ticket bien qualifie fait gagner du temps en developpement. En cas de doute, demander des clarifications plutot que supposer.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Retest
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Re-run all tests after bug fixes or corrections. Ensure no regressions were introduced.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Review what was fixed/changed
|
|
10
|
+
2. Run unit tests: `npm test`
|
|
11
|
+
3. Run integration tests if applicable
|
|
12
|
+
4. Run E2E tests if applicable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify the original issue is fixed
|
|
14
|
+
6. Check for regressions in related functionality
|
|
15
|
+
7. If tests fail: return to appropriate column for fixes
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Retest passed: all tests green"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] All tests pass
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Original issue is fixed
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] No regressions detected
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Related features still work
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Retest is crucial after any fix. Don't skip it even for "small" changes. Regressions are expensive.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Retest
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Re-executer tous les tests apres corrections de bugs. S'assurer qu'aucune regression n'a ete introduite.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Revoir ce qui a ete corrige/modifie
|
|
10
|
+
2. Executer les tests unitaires : `npm test`
|
|
11
|
+
3. Executer les tests d'integration si applicable
|
|
12
|
+
4. Executer les tests E2E si applicable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier que le probleme original est corrige
|
|
14
|
+
6. Verifier les regressions dans les fonctionnalites liees
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si les tests echouent : retourner a la colonne appropriee pour corrections
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Retest OK : tous les tests verts"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Tous les tests passent
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Le probleme original est corrige
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Aucune regression detectee
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Les fonctionnalites liees fonctionnent toujours
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Le retest est crucial apres toute correction. Ne pas le sauter meme pour des changements "mineurs". Les regressions coutent cher.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Code
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Perform peer code review. Ensure code quality, readability, and adherence to project standards.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Review all changed files in the ticket
|
|
10
|
+
2. Check code readability and naming conventions
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verify logic correctness
|
|
12
|
+
4. Look for potential bugs or edge cases
|
|
13
|
+
5. Check error handling
|
|
14
|
+
6. Suggest improvements if needed
|
|
15
|
+
7. If issues found: add comment with feedback and return to dev
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Code review passed: <summary>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Code is readable and well-organized
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Naming is clear and consistent
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] No obvious bugs or logic errors
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Error handling is appropriate
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Be constructive in feedback. Focus on significant issues, not style preferences. Approve when good enough, not perfect.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Code
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Effectuer une revue de code. Assurer la qualite du code, sa lisibilite et le respect des standards du projet.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Revoir tous les fichiers modifies dans le ticket
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verifier la lisibilite du code et les conventions de nommage
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verifier la justesse de la logique
|
|
12
|
+
4. Rechercher les bugs potentiels ou cas limites
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier la gestion des erreurs
|
|
14
|
+
6. Suggerer des ameliorations si necessaire
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si problemes trouves : ajouter un commentaire avec feedback et retourner au dev
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Code review OK : <resume>"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Le code est lisible et bien organise
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Le nommage est clair et consistant
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Pas de bugs ou erreurs de logique evidents
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] La gestion des erreurs est appropriee
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Etre constructif dans les retours. Se concentrer sur les problemes significatifs, pas les preferences de style. Approuver quand c'est assez bon, pas parfait.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Specification
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Write detailed technical specifications for the ticket. Define the implementation approach clearly.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyze the qualified requirement
|
|
10
|
+
2. Define the technical architecture/approach
|
|
11
|
+
3. List files to create or modify
|
|
12
|
+
4. Define data structures if applicable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Specify API contracts if applicable
|
|
14
|
+
6. Document edge cases and error handling
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Specification complete: <technical approach>"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Technical approach is documented
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Files to modify are identified
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Edge cases are considered
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Implementation is feasible within scope
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Good specifications reduce back-and-forth during development. Be specific but not over-detailed.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Specification
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Rediger les specifications techniques detaillees pour le ticket. Definir clairement l'approche d'implementation.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyser le besoin qualifie
|
|
10
|
+
2. Definir l'architecture/approche technique
|
|
11
|
+
3. Lister les fichiers a creer ou modifier
|
|
12
|
+
4. Definir les structures de donnees si applicable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Specifier les contrats API si applicable
|
|
14
|
+
6. Documenter les cas limites et la gestion d'erreurs
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Specification terminee : <approche technique>"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] L'approche technique est documentee
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Les fichiers a modifier sont identifies
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Les cas limites sont consideres
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] L'implementation est faisable dans le scope
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
De bonnes specifications reduisent les allers-retours pendant le developpement. Etre specifique mais pas sur-detaille.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Integration
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Run integration tests to verify components work correctly together. Ensure system-level functionality.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identify integration points to test
|
|
10
|
+
2. Run existing integration test suite
|
|
11
|
+
3. Add new integration tests if needed
|
|
12
|
+
4. Test API integrations
|
|
13
|
+
5. Test database operations
|
|
14
|
+
6. Test external service connections
|
|
15
|
+
7. Fix any failing tests
|
|
16
|
+
8. Commit + push test files
|
|
17
|
+
9. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Integration tests passed"`
|
|
19
|
+
11. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] All integration tests pass
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] API contracts verified
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Database operations work correctly
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] External services respond as expected
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Integration tests are slower but catch issues unit tests miss. Focus on critical paths and data flows.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Integration
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Executer les tests d'integration pour verifier que les composants fonctionnent correctement ensemble. Assurer la fonctionnalite au niveau systeme.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identifier les points d'integration a tester
|
|
10
|
+
2. Executer la suite de tests d'integration existante
|
|
11
|
+
3. Ajouter de nouveaux tests d'integration si necessaire
|
|
12
|
+
4. Tester les integrations API
|
|
13
|
+
5. Tester les operations base de donnees
|
|
14
|
+
6. Tester les connexions aux services externes
|
|
15
|
+
7. Corriger les tests en echec
|
|
16
|
+
8. Commit + push des fichiers de test
|
|
17
|
+
9. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tests d'integration OK"`
|
|
19
|
+
11. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Tous les tests d'integration passent
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Les contrats API sont verifies
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Les operations base de donnees fonctionnent
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Les services externes repondent comme attendu
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Les tests d'integration sont plus lents mais detectent des problemes que les tests unitaires ratent. Se concentrer sur les chemins critiques et flux de donnees.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Unit
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Write and run unit tests for the implemented feature. Ensure code coverage and reliability.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identify functions/components to test
|
|
10
|
+
2. Write unit tests covering happy path
|
|
11
|
+
3. Write tests for edge cases
|
|
12
|
+
4. Write tests for error scenarios
|
|
13
|
+
5. Run all unit tests: `npm test` or equivalent
|
|
14
|
+
6. Fix any failing tests
|
|
15
|
+
7. Verify coverage meets project standards
|
|
16
|
+
8. Commit + push test files
|
|
17
|
+
9. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Unit tests passed: <coverage>%"`
|
|
19
|
+
11. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] All new code has unit tests
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Happy path is covered
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Edge cases are tested
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] All tests pass
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Good unit tests are fast, isolated, and deterministic. Test behavior, not implementation details.
|