@autocode-cli/autocode 0.1.5 → 0.1.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (118) hide show
  1. package/dist/cli/commands/serve.d.ts.map +1 -1
  2. package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js +27 -0
  3. package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js.map +1 -1
  4. package/dist/cli/commands/sync.d.ts +9 -0
  5. package/dist/cli/commands/sync.d.ts.map +1 -0
  6. package/dist/cli/commands/sync.js +91 -0
  7. package/dist/cli/commands/sync.js.map +1 -0
  8. package/dist/cli/parser.d.ts.map +1 -1
  9. package/dist/cli/parser.js +2 -0
  10. package/dist/cli/parser.js.map +1 -1
  11. package/dist/core/catalog.d.ts +52 -0
  12. package/dist/core/catalog.d.ts.map +1 -0
  13. package/dist/core/catalog.js +101 -0
  14. package/dist/core/catalog.js.map +1 -0
  15. package/dist/core/column.d.ts +2 -1
  16. package/dist/core/column.d.ts.map +1 -1
  17. package/dist/core/column.js +23 -11
  18. package/dist/core/column.js.map +1 -1
  19. package/dist/core/pipeline.d.ts +70 -0
  20. package/dist/core/pipeline.d.ts.map +1 -0
  21. package/dist/core/pipeline.js +199 -0
  22. package/dist/core/pipeline.js.map +1 -0
  23. package/dist/core/sync.d.ts +41 -0
  24. package/dist/core/sync.d.ts.map +1 -0
  25. package/dist/core/sync.js +269 -0
  26. package/dist/core/sync.js.map +1 -0
  27. package/dist/server/api.d.ts.map +1 -1
  28. package/dist/server/api.js +330 -6
  29. package/dist/server/api.js.map +1 -1
  30. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.d.ts +1 -0
  31. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  32. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.js +1 -0
  33. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/index.js.map +1 -1
  34. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.d.ts.map +1 -1
  35. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.js +2 -1
  36. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/main-dashboard.js.map +1 -1
  37. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.d.ts +8 -0
  38. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.d.ts.map +1 -0
  39. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.js +1570 -0
  40. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/pipeline-configurator.js.map +1 -0
  41. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.d.ts +10 -0
  42. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.d.ts.map +1 -0
  43. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.js +910 -0
  44. package/dist/server/dashboard/pages/water-quality-form.js.map +1 -0
  45. package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.d.ts.map +1 -1
  46. package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.js +11 -0
  47. package/dist/server/dashboard/styles/base.js.map +1 -1
  48. package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts +1 -1
  49. package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts.map +1 -1
  50. package/dist/server/dashboard.js +1 -1
  51. package/dist/server/dashboard.js.map +1 -1
  52. package/dist/server/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  53. package/dist/server/index.js +16 -1
  54. package/dist/server/index.js.map +1 -1
  55. package/dist/services/claude.d.ts +2 -1
  56. package/dist/services/claude.d.ts.map +1 -1
  57. package/dist/services/claude.js +8 -1
  58. package/dist/services/claude.js.map +1 -1
  59. package/dist/types/index.d.ts +67 -0
  60. package/dist/types/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  61. package/package.json +2 -2
  62. package/templates/catalog.yaml +99 -0
  63. package/templates/prompts/changelog.en.md +31 -0
  64. package/templates/prompts/changelog.fr.md +31 -0
  65. package/templates/prompts/deploy-prod.en.md +32 -0
  66. package/templates/prompts/deploy-prod.fr.md +32 -0
  67. package/templates/prompts/design.en.md +30 -0
  68. package/templates/prompts/design.fr.md +30 -0
  69. package/templates/prompts/dev.en.md +31 -0
  70. package/templates/prompts/dev.fr.md +31 -0
  71. package/templates/prompts/git-commit.en.md +35 -0
  72. package/templates/prompts/git-commit.fr.md +35 -0
  73. package/templates/prompts/git-push.en.md +31 -0
  74. package/templates/prompts/git-push.fr.md +31 -0
  75. package/templates/prompts/git-tag.en.md +32 -0
  76. package/templates/prompts/git-tag.fr.md +32 -0
  77. package/templates/prompts/qualification.en.md +30 -0
  78. package/templates/prompts/qualification.fr.md +30 -0
  79. package/templates/prompts/retest.en.md +31 -0
  80. package/templates/prompts/retest.fr.md +31 -0
  81. package/templates/prompts/review-code.en.md +31 -0
  82. package/templates/prompts/review-code.fr.md +31 -0
  83. package/templates/prompts/specification.en.md +30 -0
  84. package/templates/prompts/specification.fr.md +30 -0
  85. package/templates/prompts/testing-integration.en.md +32 -0
  86. package/templates/prompts/testing-integration.fr.md +32 -0
  87. package/templates/prompts/testing-unit.en.md +32 -0
  88. package/templates/prompts/testing-unit.fr.md +32 -0
  89. /package/templates/{columns/00_backlog.en.md → prompts/backlog.en.md} +0 -0
  90. /package/templates/{columns/00_backlog.fr.md → prompts/backlog.fr.md} +0 -0
  91. /package/templates/{columns/12_deploy-staging.en.md → prompts/deploy-staging.en.md} +0 -0
  92. /package/templates/{columns/12_deploy-staging.fr.md → prompts/deploy-staging.fr.md} +0 -0
  93. /package/templates/{columns/14_done.en.md → prompts/done.en.md} +0 -0
  94. /package/templates/{columns/14_done.fr.md → prompts/done.fr.md} +0 -0
  95. /package/templates/{columns/02_in-progress.en.md → prompts/in-progress.en.md} +0 -0
  96. /package/templates/{columns/02_in-progress.fr.md → prompts/in-progress.fr.md} +0 -0
  97. /package/templates/{columns/01_ready.en.md → prompts/ready.en.md} +0 -0
  98. /package/templates/{columns/01_ready.fr.md → prompts/ready.fr.md} +0 -0
  99. /package/templates/{columns/10_retest-cypress.en.md → prompts/retest-cypress.en.md} +0 -0
  100. /package/templates/{columns/10_retest-cypress.fr.md → prompts/retest-cypress.fr.md} +0 -0
  101. /package/templates/{columns/09_retest-playwright.en.md → prompts/retest-playwright.en.md} +0 -0
  102. /package/templates/{columns/09_retest-playwright.fr.md → prompts/retest-playwright.fr.md} +0 -0
  103. /package/templates/{columns/05_review-best-practices.en.md → prompts/review-best-practices.en.md} +0 -0
  104. /package/templates/{columns/05_review-best-practices.fr.md → prompts/review-best-practices.fr.md} +0 -0
  105. /package/templates/{columns/07_review-consistency.en.md → prompts/review-consistency.en.md} +0 -0
  106. /package/templates/{columns/07_review-consistency.fr.md → prompts/review-consistency.fr.md} +0 -0
  107. /package/templates/{columns/06_review-no-duplication.en.md → prompts/review-no-duplication.en.md} +0 -0
  108. /package/templates/{columns/06_review-no-duplication.fr.md → prompts/review-no-duplication.fr.md} +0 -0
  109. /package/templates/{columns/08_review-security.en.md → prompts/review-security.en.md} +0 -0
  110. /package/templates/{columns/08_review-security.fr.md → prompts/review-security.fr.md} +0 -0
  111. /package/templates/{columns/04_testing-cypress.en.md → prompts/testing-cypress.en.md} +0 -0
  112. /package/templates/{columns/04_testing-cypress.fr.md → prompts/testing-cypress.fr.md} +0 -0
  113. /package/templates/{columns/03_testing-playwright.en.md → prompts/testing-playwright.en.md} +0 -0
  114. /package/templates/{columns/03_testing-playwright.fr.md → prompts/testing-playwright.fr.md} +0 -0
  115. /package/templates/{columns/11_update-docs.en.md → prompts/update-docs.en.md} +0 -0
  116. /package/templates/{columns/11_update-docs.fr.md → prompts/update-docs.fr.md} +0 -0
  117. /package/templates/{columns/13_validate-staging.en.md → prompts/validate-staging.en.md} +0 -0
  118. /package/templates/{columns/13_validate-staging.fr.md → prompts/validate-staging.fr.md} +0 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1
+ # Design
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Creer le design technique et/ou UX pour la fonctionnalite. Preparer les maquettes, diagrammes ou documents d'architecture selon les besoins.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Revoir les specifications et exigences
10
+ 2. Creer des maquettes UI/wireframes si interface utilisateur
11
+ 3. Designer l'architecture des composants si applicable
12
+ 4. Creer des diagrammes de sequence pour les flux complexes
13
+ 5. Definir l'approche de gestion d'etat si applicable
14
+ 6. Documenter les decisions de design et compromis
15
+ 7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
16
+ 8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Design termine : <resume>"`
17
+ 9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
18
+
19
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
20
+
21
+ ## Criteres de Validation
22
+
23
+ - [ ] Le design repond a toutes les exigences
24
+ - [ ] L'experience utilisateur est consideree
25
+ - [ ] La faisabilite technique est confirmee
26
+ - [ ] Le design est documente/accessible
27
+
28
+ ## Notes
29
+
30
+ Un bon design evite des refactorisations couteuses plus tard. Equilibrer rigueur et pragmatisme selon la complexite du ticket.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Development
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Implement the feature or fix according to specifications. Write clean, maintainable code.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Review specifications and design documents
10
+ 2. Create/modify necessary files
11
+ 3. Implement the feature following coding standards
12
+ 4. Add inline comments for complex logic
13
+ 5. Handle edge cases and errors gracefully
14
+ 6. Test locally before committing
15
+ 7. Commit + push with descriptive message
16
+ 8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Development complete: <files modified>"`
18
+ 10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Validation Criteria
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Feature works as specified
25
+ - [ ] Code follows project conventions
26
+ - [ ] No console errors or warnings
27
+ - [ ] Edge cases handled
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Write code for humans first, computers second. Keep functions small and focused. When in doubt, refactor.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Developpement
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Implementer la fonctionnalite ou le correctif selon les specifications. Ecrire du code propre et maintenable.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Revoir les specifications et documents de design
10
+ 2. Creer/modifier les fichiers necessaires
11
+ 3. Implementer la fonctionnalite en suivant les standards de code
12
+ 4. Ajouter des commentaires pour la logique complexe
13
+ 5. Gerer les cas limites et erreurs elegamment
14
+ 6. Tester localement avant de commiter
15
+ 7. Commit + push avec message descriptif
16
+ 8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Developpement termine : <fichiers modifies>"`
18
+ 10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Criteres de Validation
23
+
24
+ - [ ] La fonctionnalite fonctionne comme specifie
25
+ - [ ] Le code suit les conventions du projet
26
+ - [ ] Pas d'erreurs ou warnings console
27
+ - [ ] Les cas limites sont geres
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Ecrire du code pour les humains d'abord, les machines ensuite. Garder les fonctions petites et focalisees. En cas de doute, refactoriser.
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ # Git Commit
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Create a clean, atomic git commit for the changes. Follow conventional commit format.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Review all staged changes: `git status`
10
+ 2. Ensure only relevant files are staged
11
+ 3. Write commit message following format:
12
+ - `feat:` for new features
13
+ - `fix:` for bug fixes
14
+ - `docs:` for documentation
15
+ - `refactor:` for refactoring
16
+ - `test:` for tests
17
+ 4. Include ticket key in commit body
18
+ 5. Create commit: `git commit -m "<type>: <description>"`
19
+ 6. Verify commit: `git log -1`
20
+ 7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
21
+ 8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Committed: <commit hash>"`
22
+ 9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
23
+
24
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
25
+
26
+ ## Validation Criteria
27
+
28
+ - [ ] Commit message follows convention
29
+ - [ ] Only relevant files included
30
+ - [ ] Commit is atomic (single purpose)
31
+ - [ ] Ticket key referenced
32
+
33
+ ## Notes
34
+
35
+ Good commits tell a story. Each commit should be a logical unit of change that could be reverted independently.
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ # Git Commit
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Creer un commit git propre et atomique pour les changements. Suivre le format conventional commit.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Revoir tous les changements stages : `git status`
10
+ 2. S'assurer que seuls les fichiers pertinents sont stages
11
+ 3. Ecrire le message de commit suivant le format :
12
+ - `feat:` pour les nouvelles fonctionnalites
13
+ - `fix:` pour les corrections de bugs
14
+ - `docs:` pour la documentation
15
+ - `refactor:` pour le refactoring
16
+ - `test:` pour les tests
17
+ 4. Inclure la cle du ticket dans le corps du commit
18
+ 5. Creer le commit : `git commit -m "<type>: <description>"`
19
+ 6. Verifier le commit : `git log -1`
20
+ 7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
21
+ 8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Commite : <hash du commit>"`
22
+ 9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
23
+
24
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
25
+
26
+ ## Criteres de Validation
27
+
28
+ - [ ] Le message de commit suit la convention
29
+ - [ ] Seuls les fichiers pertinents sont inclus
30
+ - [ ] Le commit est atomique (but unique)
31
+ - [ ] La cle du ticket est referencee
32
+
33
+ ## Notes
34
+
35
+ De bons commits racontent une histoire. Chaque commit doit etre une unite logique de changement qui pourrait etre revertee independamment.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Git Push
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Push committed changes to the remote repository. Ensure CI/CD pipelines pass.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Verify all commits are ready: `git log origin/main..HEAD`
10
+ 2. Pull latest changes: `git pull --rebase origin main`
11
+ 3. Resolve any conflicts if needed
12
+ 4. Push to remote: `git push origin <branch>`
13
+ 5. Verify push succeeded
14
+ 6. Check CI/CD pipeline status
15
+ 7. If pipeline fails: fix issues and re-push
16
+ 8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Pushed to <branch>"`
18
+ 10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Validation Criteria
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Changes pushed successfully
25
+ - [ ] No merge conflicts
26
+ - [ ] CI/CD pipeline passes
27
+ - [ ] Branch is up to date
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Always pull before push to avoid conflicts. If CI fails, fix it immediately - don't leave the build broken.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Git Push
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Pousser les changements commites vers le depot distant. S'assurer que les pipelines CI/CD passent.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Verifier que tous les commits sont prets : `git log origin/main..HEAD`
10
+ 2. Recuperer les derniers changements : `git pull --rebase origin main`
11
+ 3. Resoudre les conflits si necessaire
12
+ 4. Pousser vers le distant : `git push origin <branche>`
13
+ 5. Verifier que le push a reussi
14
+ 6. Verifier le statut du pipeline CI/CD
15
+ 7. Si le pipeline echoue : corriger les problemes et re-pousser
16
+ 8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Pousse vers <branche>"`
18
+ 10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Criteres de Validation
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Les changements sont pousses avec succes
25
+ - [ ] Pas de conflits de merge
26
+ - [ ] Le pipeline CI/CD passe
27
+ - [ ] La branche est a jour
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Toujours pull avant push pour eviter les conflits. Si la CI echoue, corriger immediatement - ne pas laisser le build casse.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Git Tag
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Create a version tag for the release. Follow semantic versioning.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Determine version bump based on changes:
10
+ - MAJOR: breaking changes
11
+ - MINOR: new features (backward compatible)
12
+ - PATCH: bug fixes
13
+ 2. Check current version: `git describe --tags --abbrev=0`
14
+ 3. Create annotated tag: `git tag -a v<version> -m "<release notes>"`
15
+ 4. Push tag: `git push origin v<version>`
16
+ 5. Verify tag on remote
17
+ 6. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
18
+ 7. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Tagged: v<version>"`
19
+ 8. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
20
+
21
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
22
+
23
+ ## Validation Criteria
24
+
25
+ - [ ] Version follows semver
26
+ - [ ] Tag is annotated with message
27
+ - [ ] Tag pushed to remote
28
+ - [ ] Version increment is appropriate
29
+
30
+ ## Notes
31
+
32
+ Semantic versioning: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. Be conservative - when in doubt, use PATCH. Breaking changes require MAJOR bump.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Git Tag
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Creer un tag de version pour la release. Suivre le versionnement semantique.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Determiner l'increment de version selon les changements :
10
+ - MAJOR : changements cassants
11
+ - MINOR : nouvelles fonctionnalites (retrocompatibles)
12
+ - PATCH : corrections de bugs
13
+ 2. Verifier la version actuelle : `git describe --tags --abbrev=0`
14
+ 3. Creer un tag annote : `git tag -a v<version> -m "<notes de release>"`
15
+ 4. Pousser le tag : `git push origin v<version>`
16
+ 5. Verifier le tag sur le distant
17
+ 6. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
18
+ 7. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tag cree : v<version>"`
19
+ 8. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
20
+
21
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
22
+
23
+ ## Criteres de Validation
24
+
25
+ - [ ] La version suit semver
26
+ - [ ] Le tag est annote avec un message
27
+ - [ ] Le tag est pousse sur le distant
28
+ - [ ] L'increment de version est approprie
29
+
30
+ ## Notes
31
+
32
+ Versionnement semantique : MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. Etre conservateur - en cas de doute, utiliser PATCH. Les changements cassants necessitent un bump MAJOR.
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1
+ # Qualification
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Analyze and qualify the ticket requirement. Ensure the request is clear, feasible, and properly scoped.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Read the ticket description and acceptance criteria
10
+ 2. Identify ambiguities or missing information
11
+ 3. Assess technical feasibility
12
+ 4. Estimate complexity (simple/medium/complex)
13
+ 5. Identify dependencies with other tickets or systems
14
+ 6. If clarification needed: add comment with questions
15
+ 7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
16
+ 8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Qualification complete: <summary>"`
17
+ 9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
18
+
19
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
20
+
21
+ ## Validation Criteria
22
+
23
+ - [ ] Requirement is clear and unambiguous
24
+ - [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
25
+ - [ ] Technical approach identified
26
+ - [ ] No blocking dependencies
27
+
28
+ ## Notes
29
+
30
+ A well-qualified ticket saves development time. When in doubt, ask for clarification rather than assuming.
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1
+ # Qualification
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Analyser et qualifier le besoin du ticket. S'assurer que la demande est claire, faisable et correctement delimitee.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Lire la description du ticket et les criteres d'acceptation
10
+ 2. Identifier les ambiguites ou informations manquantes
11
+ 3. Evaluer la faisabilite technique
12
+ 4. Estimer la complexite (simple/moyenne/complexe)
13
+ 5. Identifier les dependances avec d'autres tickets ou systemes
14
+ 6. Si clarification necessaire : ajouter un commentaire avec les questions
15
+ 7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
16
+ 8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Qualification terminee : <resume>"`
17
+ 9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
18
+
19
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
20
+
21
+ ## Criteres de Validation
22
+
23
+ - [ ] Le besoin est clair et sans ambiguite
24
+ - [ ] Les criteres d'acceptation sont testables
25
+ - [ ] L'approche technique est identifiee
26
+ - [ ] Pas de dependances bloquantes
27
+
28
+ ## Notes
29
+
30
+ Un ticket bien qualifie fait gagner du temps en developpement. En cas de doute, demander des clarifications plutot que supposer.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Retest
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Re-run all tests after bug fixes or corrections. Ensure no regressions were introduced.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Review what was fixed/changed
10
+ 2. Run unit tests: `npm test`
11
+ 3. Run integration tests if applicable
12
+ 4. Run E2E tests if applicable
13
+ 5. Verify the original issue is fixed
14
+ 6. Check for regressions in related functionality
15
+ 7. If tests fail: return to appropriate column for fixes
16
+ 8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Retest passed: all tests green"`
18
+ 10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Validation Criteria
23
+
24
+ - [ ] All tests pass
25
+ - [ ] Original issue is fixed
26
+ - [ ] No regressions detected
27
+ - [ ] Related features still work
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Retest is crucial after any fix. Don't skip it even for "small" changes. Regressions are expensive.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Retest
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Re-executer tous les tests apres corrections de bugs. S'assurer qu'aucune regression n'a ete introduite.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Revoir ce qui a ete corrige/modifie
10
+ 2. Executer les tests unitaires : `npm test`
11
+ 3. Executer les tests d'integration si applicable
12
+ 4. Executer les tests E2E si applicable
13
+ 5. Verifier que le probleme original est corrige
14
+ 6. Verifier les regressions dans les fonctionnalites liees
15
+ 7. Si les tests echouent : retourner a la colonne appropriee pour corrections
16
+ 8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Retest OK : tous les tests verts"`
18
+ 10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Criteres de Validation
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Tous les tests passent
25
+ - [ ] Le probleme original est corrige
26
+ - [ ] Aucune regression detectee
27
+ - [ ] Les fonctionnalites liees fonctionnent toujours
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Le retest est crucial apres toute correction. Ne pas le sauter meme pour des changements "mineurs". Les regressions coutent cher.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Review Code
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Perform peer code review. Ensure code quality, readability, and adherence to project standards.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Review all changed files in the ticket
10
+ 2. Check code readability and naming conventions
11
+ 3. Verify logic correctness
12
+ 4. Look for potential bugs or edge cases
13
+ 5. Check error handling
14
+ 6. Suggest improvements if needed
15
+ 7. If issues found: add comment with feedback and return to dev
16
+ 8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Code review passed: <summary>"`
18
+ 10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Validation Criteria
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Code is readable and well-organized
25
+ - [ ] Naming is clear and consistent
26
+ - [ ] No obvious bugs or logic errors
27
+ - [ ] Error handling is appropriate
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Be constructive in feedback. Focus on significant issues, not style preferences. Approve when good enough, not perfect.
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ # Review Code
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Effectuer une revue de code. Assurer la qualite du code, sa lisibilite et le respect des standards du projet.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Revoir tous les fichiers modifies dans le ticket
10
+ 2. Verifier la lisibilite du code et les conventions de nommage
11
+ 3. Verifier la justesse de la logique
12
+ 4. Rechercher les bugs potentiels ou cas limites
13
+ 5. Verifier la gestion des erreurs
14
+ 6. Suggerer des ameliorations si necessaire
15
+ 7. Si problemes trouves : ajouter un commentaire avec feedback et retourner au dev
16
+ 8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
17
+ 9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Code review OK : <resume>"`
18
+ 10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
19
+
20
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
21
+
22
+ ## Criteres de Validation
23
+
24
+ - [ ] Le code est lisible et bien organise
25
+ - [ ] Le nommage est clair et consistant
26
+ - [ ] Pas de bugs ou erreurs de logique evidents
27
+ - [ ] La gestion des erreurs est appropriee
28
+
29
+ ## Notes
30
+
31
+ Etre constructif dans les retours. Se concentrer sur les problemes significatifs, pas les preferences de style. Approuver quand c'est assez bon, pas parfait.
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1
+ # Specification
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Write detailed technical specifications for the ticket. Define the implementation approach clearly.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Analyze the qualified requirement
10
+ 2. Define the technical architecture/approach
11
+ 3. List files to create or modify
12
+ 4. Define data structures if applicable
13
+ 5. Specify API contracts if applicable
14
+ 6. Document edge cases and error handling
15
+ 7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
16
+ 8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Specification complete: <technical approach>"`
17
+ 9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
18
+
19
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
20
+
21
+ ## Validation Criteria
22
+
23
+ - [ ] Technical approach is documented
24
+ - [ ] Files to modify are identified
25
+ - [ ] Edge cases are considered
26
+ - [ ] Implementation is feasible within scope
27
+
28
+ ## Notes
29
+
30
+ Good specifications reduce back-and-forth during development. Be specific but not over-detailed.
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
1
+ # Specification
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Rediger les specifications techniques detaillees pour le ticket. Definir clairement l'approche d'implementation.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Analyser le besoin qualifie
10
+ 2. Definir l'architecture/approche technique
11
+ 3. Lister les fichiers a creer ou modifier
12
+ 4. Definir les structures de donnees si applicable
13
+ 5. Specifier les contrats API si applicable
14
+ 6. Documenter les cas limites et la gestion d'erreurs
15
+ 7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
16
+ 8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Specification terminee : <approche technique>"`
17
+ 9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
18
+
19
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
20
+
21
+ ## Criteres de Validation
22
+
23
+ - [ ] L'approche technique est documentee
24
+ - [ ] Les fichiers a modifier sont identifies
25
+ - [ ] Les cas limites sont consideres
26
+ - [ ] L'implementation est faisable dans le scope
27
+
28
+ ## Notes
29
+
30
+ De bonnes specifications reduisent les allers-retours pendant le developpement. Etre specifique mais pas sur-detaille.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Testing Integration
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Run integration tests to verify components work correctly together. Ensure system-level functionality.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Identify integration points to test
10
+ 2. Run existing integration test suite
11
+ 3. Add new integration tests if needed
12
+ 4. Test API integrations
13
+ 5. Test database operations
14
+ 6. Test external service connections
15
+ 7. Fix any failing tests
16
+ 8. Commit + push test files
17
+ 9. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
18
+ 10. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Integration tests passed"`
19
+ 11. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
20
+
21
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
22
+
23
+ ## Validation Criteria
24
+
25
+ - [ ] All integration tests pass
26
+ - [ ] API contracts verified
27
+ - [ ] Database operations work correctly
28
+ - [ ] External services respond as expected
29
+
30
+ ## Notes
31
+
32
+ Integration tests are slower but catch issues unit tests miss. Focus on critical paths and data flows.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Testing Integration
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Executer les tests d'integration pour verifier que les composants fonctionnent correctement ensemble. Assurer la fonctionnalite au niveau systeme.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Identifier les points d'integration a tester
10
+ 2. Executer la suite de tests d'integration existante
11
+ 3. Ajouter de nouveaux tests d'integration si necessaire
12
+ 4. Tester les integrations API
13
+ 5. Tester les operations base de donnees
14
+ 6. Tester les connexions aux services externes
15
+ 7. Corriger les tests en echec
16
+ 8. Commit + push des fichiers de test
17
+ 9. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new "<titre>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteres>" -s patch`
18
+ 10. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tests d'integration OK"`
19
+ 11. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
20
+
21
+ > Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
22
+
23
+ ## Criteres de Validation
24
+
25
+ - [ ] Tous les tests d'integration passent
26
+ - [ ] Les contrats API sont verifies
27
+ - [ ] Les operations base de donnees fonctionnent
28
+ - [ ] Les services externes repondent comme attendu
29
+
30
+ ## Notes
31
+
32
+ Les tests d'integration sont plus lents mais detectent des problemes que les tests unitaires ratent. Se concentrer sur les chemins critiques et flux de donnees.
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Testing Unit
2
+
3
+ ## Role
4
+
5
+ Write and run unit tests for the implemented feature. Ensure code coverage and reliability.
6
+
7
+ ## Actions
8
+
9
+ 1. Identify functions/components to test
10
+ 2. Write unit tests covering happy path
11
+ 3. Write tests for edge cases
12
+ 4. Write tests for error scenarios
13
+ 5. Run all unit tests: `npm test` or equivalent
14
+ 6. Fix any failing tests
15
+ 7. Verify coverage meets project standards
16
+ 8. Commit + push test files
17
+ 9. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new "<title>" "<description>" -p P2 -l "<labels>" -a "<criteria>" -s patch`
18
+ 10. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Unit tests passed: <coverage>%"`
19
+ 11. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
20
+
21
+ > Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
22
+
23
+ ## Validation Criteria
24
+
25
+ - [ ] All new code has unit tests
26
+ - [ ] Happy path is covered
27
+ - [ ] Edge cases are tested
28
+ - [ ] All tests pass
29
+
30
+ ## Notes
31
+
32
+ Good unit tests are fast, isolated, and deterministic. Test behavior, not implementation details.