@autocode-cli/autocode 0.0.22
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +172 -0
- package/bin/autocode +2 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/comment.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/comment.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/comment.js +37 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/comment.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/init.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/init.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/init.js +41 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/init.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/list.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/list.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/list.js +78 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/list.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/move.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/move.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/move.js +59 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/move.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/new.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/new.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/new.js +74 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/new.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/next.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/next.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/next.js +46 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/next.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js +55 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/serve.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/show.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/show.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/show.js +91 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/show.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.d.ts +13 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.js +54 -0
- package/dist/cli/parser.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/column.d.ts +53 -0
- package/dist/core/column.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/column.js +128 -0
- package/dist/core/column.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/ticket.d.ts +50 -0
- package/dist/core/ticket.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/ticket.js +228 -0
- package/dist/core/ticket.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/workflow.d.ts +66 -0
- package/dist/core/workflow.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/workflow.js +176 -0
- package/dist/core/workflow.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +9 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/api.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/server/api.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/api.js +313 -0
- package/dist/server/api.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard.js +1865 -0
- package/dist/server/dashboard.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/index.d.ts +8 -0
- package/dist/server/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/index.js +94 -0
- package/dist/server/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/watcher.d.ts +13 -0
- package/dist/server/watcher.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/watcher.js +62 -0
- package/dist/server/watcher.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/websocket.d.ts +26 -0
- package/dist/server/websocket.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server/websocket.js +165 -0
- package/dist/server/websocket.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/services/claude.d.ts +52 -0
- package/dist/services/claude.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/services/claude.js +304 -0
- package/dist/services/claude.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/services/ticket-io.d.ts +76 -0
- package/dist/services/ticket-io.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/services/ticket-io.js +248 -0
- package/dist/services/ticket-io.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/types/index.d.ts +79 -0
- package/dist/types/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/types/index.js +5 -0
- package/dist/types/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/config.d.ts +93 -0
- package/dist/utils/config.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/config.js +96 -0
- package/dist/utils/config.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/fs.d.ts +60 -0
- package/dist/utils/fs.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/fs.js +129 -0
- package/dist/utils/fs.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/logger.d.ts +23 -0
- package/dist/utils/logger.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/utils/logger.js +56 -0
- package/dist/utils/logger.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +57 -0
- package/templates/columns/00_backlog.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/00_backlog.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/01_ready.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/01_ready.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/02_in-progress.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/02_in-progress.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/03_review-best-practices.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/03_review-best-practices.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/04_review-no-duplication.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/04_review-no-duplication.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/05_review-consistency.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/05_review-consistency.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/06_review-security.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/columns/06_review-security.fr.md +32 -0
- package/templates/columns/07_testing-playwright.en.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/07_testing-playwright.fr.md +30 -0
- package/templates/columns/08_testing-cypress.en.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/08_testing-cypress.fr.md +31 -0
- package/templates/columns/09_update-docs.en.md +29 -0
- package/templates/columns/09_update-docs.fr.md +29 -0
- package/templates/columns/10_deploy-staging.en.md +29 -0
- package/templates/columns/10_deploy-staging.fr.md +29 -0
- package/templates/columns/11_validate-staging.en.md +32 -0
- package/templates/columns/11_validate-staging.fr.md +32 -0
- package/templates/columns/12_done.en.md +23 -0
- package/templates/columns/12_done.fr.md +23 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Backlog
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Stockage des nouveaux tickets. Les tickets ici doivent etre qualifies avant de commencer le travail.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Lire le ticket (titre, description, pieces jointes)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verifier la qualite et la completude du ticket
|
|
11
|
+
3. Si mal redige : reecrire le titre et enrichir la description
|
|
12
|
+
4. Definir les criteres d'acceptation si manquants
|
|
13
|
+
5. Definir la priorite (P0-P3) selon l'impact et l'urgence
|
|
14
|
+
6. Identifier le perimetre et les fichiers potentiellement impactes
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Qualification effectuee"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Titre explicite (verbe + quoi + contexte)
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Description claire et structuree
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Perimetre defini (inclus/exclus)
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Priorite definie correctement
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Si bug : etapes de reproduction documentees
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Un ticket peut etre une feature, bug, investigation, question ou tache technique. Qualifier rigoureusement avant de commencer.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Ready
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Qualified tickets ready to be worked on. All information needed is available.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyze ticket and acceptance criteria
|
|
10
|
+
2. Explore codebase to understand existing context
|
|
11
|
+
3. Plan modifications (files to create/modify)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Implement the solution
|
|
13
|
+
5. Test locally that it works
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push work done
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Work completed"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Feature/fix is implemented
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Local tests pass
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code is committed and pushed
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] A comment summarizes work done
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
For investigation: documented answer is the deliverable. For bug: identify root cause before coding fix.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Ready
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Tickets qualifies prets a etre travailles. Toutes les informations necessaires sont disponibles.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyser le ticket et les criteres d'acceptation
|
|
10
|
+
2. Explorer le codebase pour comprendre le contexte existant
|
|
11
|
+
3. Planifier les modifications (fichiers a creer/modifier)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Implementer la solution
|
|
13
|
+
5. Tester localement que ca fonctionne
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push du travail effectue
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Travail effectue"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Feature/fix implementee
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Tests locaux passent
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code commite et pousse
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Un commentaire resume le travail effectue
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Pour investigation : la reponse documentee est le livrable. Pour bug : identifier la cause racine avant de coder le fix.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# In Progress
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Active development. Ticket is being worked on, code is being written.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyze ticket and acceptance criteria
|
|
10
|
+
2. Explore codebase to understand existing context
|
|
11
|
+
3. Plan modifications (files to create/modify)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Implement the solution
|
|
13
|
+
5. Test locally that it works
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push work done
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Work completed"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Feature/fix is implemented
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Local tests pass
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code is committed and pushed
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] A comment summarizes work done
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
For investigation: documented answer is the deliverable. For bug: identify root cause before coding fix.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# In Progress
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Developpement actif. Le ticket est en cours de travail, le code est en cours d'ecriture.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyser le ticket et les criteres d'acceptation
|
|
10
|
+
2. Explorer le codebase pour comprendre le contexte existant
|
|
11
|
+
3. Planifier les modifications (fichiers a creer/modifier)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Implementer la solution
|
|
13
|
+
5. Tester localement que ca fonctionne
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push du travail effectue
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Travail effectue"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Feature/fix implementee
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Tests locaux passent
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code commite et pousse
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Un commentaire resume le travail effectue
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Pour investigation : la reponse documentee est le livrable. Pour bug : identifier la cause racine avant de coder le fix.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Best Practices
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Code quality audit. Verify conventions and best practices are followed.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identify modified files
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verify naming (camelCase variables, PascalCase components)
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verify function size (< 30 lines)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verify file size (components < 300 lines)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify import organization
|
|
14
|
+
6. Fix violations found
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push corrections
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Review best practices OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Consistent naming respected
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Functions short and readable
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Files of reasonable size
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Code clean and maintainable
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Don't over-comment. Comments are for non-obvious logic. Good code is self-documented by variable and function names.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Best Practices
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Audit qualite du code. Verifier que les conventions et bonnes pratiques sont respectees.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identifier les fichiers modifies
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verifier le nommage (camelCase variables, PascalCase composants)
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verifier la taille des fonctions (< 30 lignes)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verifier la taille des fichiers (composants < 300 lignes)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier l'organisation des imports
|
|
14
|
+
6. Corriger les violations trouvees
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push des corrections
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Review best practices OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Nommage coherent respecte
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Fonctions courtes et lisibles
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Fichiers de taille raisonnable
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Code propre et maintenable
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Ne pas sur-commenter. Les commentaires sont pour la logique non evidente. Un bon code est auto-documente par les noms de variables et fonctions.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review No Duplication
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Identify and eliminate code duplication. Factor into reusable functions/composables.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Search for similar patterns in codebase (grep)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Identify functions with >70% similarity
|
|
11
|
+
3. Spot duplicated constants
|
|
12
|
+
4. Detect copy-pasted business logic
|
|
13
|
+
5. Extract to composable/service/shared function if >2 usages
|
|
14
|
+
6. Update all existing calls
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Review no duplication OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] No significant duplication detected
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code factored if necessary
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Existing usages updated
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
DRY rule (Don't Repeat Yourself): if code appears more than 2 times, extract it. Prefer composables for Vue logic.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review No Duplication
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Identifier et eliminer la duplication de code. Factoriser en fonctions/composables reutilisables.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Rechercher des patterns similaires dans le codebase (grep)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Identifier les fonctions avec >70% de similarite
|
|
11
|
+
3. Reperer les constantes dupliquees
|
|
12
|
+
4. Detecter la logique metier copiee-collee
|
|
13
|
+
5. Extraire en composable/service/fonction partagee si >2 usages
|
|
14
|
+
6. Mettre a jour tous les appels existants
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Review no duplication OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Aucune duplication significative detectee
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Code factorise si necessaire
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Usages existants mis a jour
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Regle DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) : si du code apparait plus de 2 fois, l'extraire. Preferer les composables pour la logique Vue.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Consistency
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Verify code integrates harmoniously with existing project architecture.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verify project structure respect (components, services, stores, composables)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Ensure existing patterns are followed
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verify consistency with similar files
|
|
12
|
+
4. Check error handling (uniform try/catch)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify correct Pinia store usage
|
|
14
|
+
6. Fix inconsistencies
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Review consistency OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Project architecture respected
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Patterns consistent with existing
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Uniform error handling
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Harmonious integration
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Compare with similar files to ensure consistency. Goal: developer can't distinguish who wrote which code.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Consistency
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Verifier que le code s'integre harmonieusement avec l'architecture existante du projet.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verifier le respect de la structure projet (components, services, stores, composables)
|
|
10
|
+
2. S'assurer que les patterns existants sont suivis
|
|
11
|
+
3. Verifier la coherence avec les fichiers similaires
|
|
12
|
+
4. Controler la gestion d'erreurs (try/catch uniforme)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier l'usage correct des stores Pinia
|
|
14
|
+
6. Corriger les incoherences
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Review consistency OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Architecture projet respectee
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Patterns coherents avec l'existant
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Gestion d'erreurs uniforme
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Integration harmonieuse
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Comparer avec les fichiers similaires pour assurer la coherence. Objectif : un developpeur ne peut pas distinguer qui a ecrit quel code.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Security
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Security audit. Identify and fix potential vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10).
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Search for dangerous patterns (eval, innerHTML, hardcoded secrets)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verify user input validation
|
|
11
|
+
3. Check no sensitive data in localStorage
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verify RLS policies if new tables
|
|
13
|
+
5. Ensure API keys are in .env, never in code
|
|
14
|
+
6. Audit API calls (injection, XSS)
|
|
15
|
+
7. Fix vulnerabilities
|
|
16
|
+
8. Commit + push
|
|
17
|
+
9. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Review security OK"`
|
|
19
|
+
11. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets in code
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] User inputs validated and sanitized
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] No XSS possible (v-html avoided or DOMPurify)
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Parameterized queries (no SQL injection)
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
OWASP Top 10: A01 Broken Access Control, A02 Crypto Failures, A03 Injection, A07 XSS. When in doubt, apply least privilege.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Review Security
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Audit securite. Identifier et corriger les vulnerabilites potentielles (OWASP Top 10).
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Rechercher les patterns dangereux (eval, innerHTML, secrets en dur)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Verifier la validation des entrees utilisateur
|
|
11
|
+
3. Controler qu'aucune donnee sensible n'est dans localStorage
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verifier les politiques RLS si nouvelles tables
|
|
13
|
+
5. S'assurer que les cles API sont dans .env, jamais dans le code
|
|
14
|
+
6. Auditer les appels API (injection, XSS)
|
|
15
|
+
7. Corriger les vulnerabilites
|
|
16
|
+
8. Commit + push
|
|
17
|
+
9. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Review security OK"`
|
|
19
|
+
11. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Aucun secret en dur dans le code
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Entrees utilisateur validees et sanitisees
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Pas de XSS possible (v-html evite ou DOMPurify)
|
|
28
|
+
- [ ] Requetes parametrees (pas d'injection SQL)
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Notes
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
OWASP Top 10 : A01 Broken Access Control, A02 Crypto Failures, A03 Injection, A07 XSS. En cas de doute, appliquer le principe du moindre privilege.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Playwright
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Live functional testing with Playwright. Manually verify feature works by navigating the app.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Launch application locally
|
|
10
|
+
2. Navigate to relevant page
|
|
11
|
+
3. Test nominal scenario (standard case)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Test edge cases
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify error handling
|
|
14
|
+
6. Capture screenshots if needed
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Playwright tests OK"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Nominal scenario tested and functional
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Edge cases verified
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Appropriate error handling
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] No console errors
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
This is interactive testing, not writing test files. Goal is visual validation before writing automated tests.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Playwright
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Test fonctionnel live avec Playwright. Verifier manuellement que la feature fonctionne en naviguant dans l'app.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Lancer l'application localement
|
|
10
|
+
2. Naviguer vers la page concernee
|
|
11
|
+
3. Tester le scenario nominal (cas standard)
|
|
12
|
+
4. Tester les cas limites
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier la gestion d'erreurs
|
|
14
|
+
6. Capturer des screenshots si necessaire
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tests Playwright OK"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Scenario nominal teste et fonctionnel
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Cas limites verifies
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Gestion d'erreurs appropriee
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Pas d'erreurs console
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Notes
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
C'est du test interactif, pas de redaction de fichiers de test. L'objectif est la validation visuelle avant d'ecrire les tests automatises.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Cypress
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Write AND execute E2E automated tests to prevent regressions.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyze feature to test
|
|
10
|
+
2. Write Cypress tests (cypress/e2e/)
|
|
11
|
+
3. Use data-testid selectors
|
|
12
|
+
4. Describe tests clearly (describe/it)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Execute tests: npx cypress run
|
|
14
|
+
6. If failures: fix tests or code
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push tests
|
|
16
|
+
8. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Cypress tests OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] E2E tests written and passing
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Critical scenarios covered
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Cypress conventions respected
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Tests committed
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Tests must be maintainable. Use data-testid rather than fragile CSS selectors. Flaky tests must be fixed.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Testing Cypress
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Rediger ET executer des tests E2E automatises pour prevenir les regressions.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Analyser la feature a tester
|
|
10
|
+
2. Ecrire les tests Cypress (cypress/e2e/)
|
|
11
|
+
3. Utiliser des selecteurs data-testid
|
|
12
|
+
4. Decrire les tests clairement (describe/it)
|
|
13
|
+
5. Executer les tests : npx cypress run
|
|
14
|
+
6. Si echecs : corriger les tests ou le code
|
|
15
|
+
7. Commit + push des tests
|
|
16
|
+
8. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Tests Cypress OK"`
|
|
18
|
+
10. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Tests E2E ecrits et passants
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Scenarios critiques couverts
|
|
26
|
+
- [ ] Conventions Cypress respectees
|
|
27
|
+
- [ ] Tests commites
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Notes
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Les tests doivent etre maintenables. Utiliser data-testid plutot que des selecteurs CSS fragiles. Les tests flaky doivent etre corriges.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Update Docs
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Document changes for future developers and users.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identify what needs documentation
|
|
10
|
+
2. Update relevant files in ./docs
|
|
11
|
+
3. Document new features
|
|
12
|
+
4. Update existing guides if impacted
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verify doc consistency
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push
|
|
15
|
+
7. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Documentation updated"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Documentation up to date
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] New features documented
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Existing guides updated if needed
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Notes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Doc should be useful, not exhaustive. Document "why" and "how", not the obvious. Good doc answers questions a new developer would ask.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Update Docs
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Documenter les changements pour les futurs developpeurs et utilisateurs.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Identifier ce qui necessite de la documentation
|
|
10
|
+
2. Mettre a jour les fichiers pertinents dans ./docs
|
|
11
|
+
3. Documenter les nouvelles features
|
|
12
|
+
4. Mettre a jour les guides existants si impactes
|
|
13
|
+
5. Verifier la coherence de la doc
|
|
14
|
+
6. Commit + push
|
|
15
|
+
7. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Documentation mise a jour"`
|
|
17
|
+
9. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Documentation a jour
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Nouvelles features documentees
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Guides existants mis a jour si necessaire
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Notes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
La doc doit etre utile, pas exhaustive. Documenter le "pourquoi" et le "comment", pas l'evident. Une bonne doc repond aux questions qu'un nouveau developpeur poserait.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Deploy Staging
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Deploy changes to staging environment for validation.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verify all commits are pushed (git status)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Execute deployment to staging
|
|
11
|
+
3. Wait for deployment to complete
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verify deployment is stable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Document deployed version
|
|
14
|
+
6. If out of scope work detected: `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
15
|
+
7. Document: `autocode comment <key> "Deployed to staging"`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Advance: `autocode next <key>`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
> Or return: `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- [ ] All commits pushed
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Deployment successful
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Application accessible in staging
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] No startup errors
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Notes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
If deployment fails, analyze logs, fix, and retry. Never move if deployment is not stable.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Deploy Staging
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Role
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Deployer les changements sur l'environnement de staging pour validation.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Actions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. Verifier que tous les commits sont pousses (git status)
|
|
10
|
+
2. Executer le deploiement vers staging
|
|
11
|
+
3. Attendre la fin du deploiement
|
|
12
|
+
4. Verifier que le deploiement est stable
|
|
13
|
+
5. Documenter la version deployee
|
|
14
|
+
6. Si travail hors scope detecte : `autocode new <title> <description>`
|
|
15
|
+
7. Documenter : `autocode comment <key> "Deploye en staging"`
|
|
16
|
+
8. Avancer : `autocode next <key>`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
> Ou retour : `autocode move <key> <column>`
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Criteres de Validation
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- [ ] Tous les commits pousses
|
|
23
|
+
- [ ] Deploiement reussi
|
|
24
|
+
- [ ] Application accessible en staging
|
|
25
|
+
- [ ] Pas d'erreurs au demarrage
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Notes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Si le deploiement echoue, analyser les logs, corriger et reessayer. Ne jamais avancer si le deploiement n'est pas stable.
|