@autobe/agent 0.7.3 → 0.8.0

package/lib/index.mjs

@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@ function assertSchemaModel(model) {
     if (model === "gemini") throw new Error([ "Error on AutoBeAgent.constructor(): gemini is not supported", "because it does not follow standard JSON schema specification.", "@autobe requires union type (`oneOf` or `anyOf`) for backend code generation,", "but gemini has banned them. Please wait until when `@agentica`", "supports prompt based function calling which can detour gemini's", "restriction of JSON schema specification." ].join(" "));
 }
 
+function enforceToolCall(agent) {
+    agent.on("request", (event => {
+        if (event.body.tools) event.body.tool_choice = "required";
+        if (event.body.parallel_tool_calls !== undefined) delete event.body.parallel_tool_calls;
+    }));
+    return agent;
+}
+
 class AutoBeAnalyzeFileSystem {
     constructor(fileMap = {}) {
         this.fileMap = fileMap;
@@ -85,9 +93,11 @@ class AutoBeAnalyzeAgent {
             model: ctx.model,
             execute: new AutoBeAnalyzeFileSystem(this.fileMap),
             build: async files => {
-                this.pointer.value = {
-                    files
-                };
+                var _a;
+                (_a = this.pointer).value ?? (_a.value = {
+                    files: {}
+                });
+                Object.assign(this.pointer.value.files, files);
             }
         });
         this.createAnalyzeAgent = () => {
@@ -119,12 +129,7 @@ class AutoBeAnalyzeAgent {
                     text: [ "The following is the name of the entire file.", "Use it to build a table of contents.", this.filenames.map((filename => `- ${filename}`)), "", "However, do not touch other than the file you have to create." ].join("\n")
                 } ]
             });
-            agent.on("request", (event => {
-                if (event.body.tools) {
-                    event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-                }
-            }));
-            return agent;
+            return enforceToolCall(agent);
         };
     }
     async conversate(content, retry = 3) {
@@ -1003,11 +1008,7 @@ const orchestrateAnalyze = ctx => async props => {
         },
         histories: [ ...ctx.histories().filter((el => el.type === "assistantMessage" || el.type === "userMessage")) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     const determined = await agentica.conversate([ "Design a complete list of documents for that document", "```md", userPlanningRequirements, "```" ].join("\n"));
     const lastMessage = determined[determined.length - 1];
     if (lastMessage.type === "assistantMessage") {
@@ -1629,17 +1630,14 @@ async function step$2(ctx, document, retry) {
         controllers: [ createApplication$9({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: next => {
-                pointer.value = OpenApiV3_1Emender.convertComponents({
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = {});
+                Object.assign(pointer.value, OpenApiV3_1Emender.convertComponents({
                     schemas: next
-                }).schemas ?? {};
+                }).schemas ?? {});
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate("Fill missing schema types please");
     if (pointer.value === null) {
         throw new Error("Failed to fill missing schema types. No response from agentica.");
@@ -2056,7 +2054,7 @@ async function orchestrateInterfaceComponents(ctx, operations, capacity = 12) {
         schemas: {}
     };
     for (const y of await Promise.all(matrix.map((async it => {
-        const row = await divideAndConquer$1(ctx, operations, it, 3, (count => {
+        const row = await divideAndConquer$2(ctx, operations, it, 3, (count => {
             progress += count;
         }));
         ctx.dispatch({
@@ -2075,7 +2073,7 @@ async function orchestrateInterfaceComponents(ctx, operations, capacity = 12) {
     return x;
 }
 
-async function divideAndConquer$1(ctx, operations, typeNames, retry, progress) {
+async function divideAndConquer$2(ctx, operations, typeNames, retry, progress) {
     const remained = new Set(typeNames);
     const components = {
         schemas: {}
@@ -2116,16 +2114,17 @@ async function process$5(ctx, operations, oldbie, remained) {
         controllers: [ createApplication$8({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: async components => {
-                pointer.value = components;
+                var _a;
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = {
+                    schemas: {}
+                });
+                (_a = pointer.value).authorization ?? (_a.authorization = components.authorization);
+                Object.assign(pointer.value.schemas, components.schemas);
             },
             pointer
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     const already = Object.keys(oldbie.schemas);
     await agentica.conversate([ "Make type components please.", "", "Here is the list of request/response bodies' type names from", "OpenAPI operations. Make type components of them. If more object", "types are required during making the components, please make them", "too.", "", ...Array.from(remained).map((k => `- \`${k}\``)), ...already.length !== 0 ? [ "", "> By the way, here is the list of components schemas what you've", "> already made. So, you don't need to make them again.", ">", ...already.map((k => `> - \`${k}\``)) ] : [] ].join("\n"));
     if (pointer.value === null) {
@@ -2587,7 +2586,8 @@ async function orchestrateInterfaceEndpoints(ctx, content = "Make API endpoints
         controllers: [ createApplication$7({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: endpoints => {
-                pointer.value = endpoints;
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = endpoints);
+                pointer.value.push(...endpoints);
             }
         }) ]
     });
@@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ async function orchestrateInterfaceOperations(ctx, endpoints, capacity = 12) {
     });
     let completed = 0;
     const operations = await Promise.all(matrix.map((async it => {
-        const row = await divideAndConquer(ctx, it, 3, (count => {
+        const row = await divideAndConquer$1(ctx, it, 3, (count => {
             completed += count;
         }));
         ctx.dispatch({
@@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ async function orchestrateInterfaceOperations(ctx, endpoints, capacity = 12) {
     return operations.flat();
 }
 
-async function divideAndConquer(ctx, endpoints, retry, progress) {
+async function divideAndConquer$1(ctx, endpoints, retry, progress) {
     const remained = new HashSet(endpoints, OpenApiEndpointComparator.hashCode, OpenApiEndpointComparator.equals);
     const operations = new HashMap(OpenApiEndpointComparator.hashCode, OpenApiEndpointComparator.equals);
     for (let i = 0; i < retry; ++i) {
@@ -3009,16 +3009,12 @@ async function process$4(ctx, endpoints) {
         controllers: [ createApplication$6({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: endpoints => {
-                pointer.value = endpoints;
-            },
-            pointer
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = []);
+                pointer.value.push(...endpoints);
+            }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate([ "Make API operations for below endpoints:", "", "```json", JSON.stringify(Array.from(endpoints), null, 2), "```" ].join("\n"));
     if (pointer.value === null) throw new Error("Failed to create operations.");
     return pointer.value;
@@ -3288,7 +3284,6 @@ function createApplication$6(props) {
             };
         })()(next);
         if (result.success === false) return result;
-        props.pointer.value = result.data.operations;
         const errors = [];
         result.data.operations.forEach(((op, i) => {
             if (op.method === "get" && op.requestBody !== null) errors.push({
@@ -4917,7 +4912,10 @@ async function orchestratePrismaComponents(ctx, content = "Please extract files
         controllers: [ createApplication$5({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: next => {
-                pointer.value = next;
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = {
+                    components: []
+                });
+                pointer.value.components.push(...next.components);
             }
         }) ]
     });
@@ -5338,7 +5336,7 @@ const transformPrismaCorrectHistories = result => [ {
     id: v4(),
     created_at: (new Date).toISOString(),
     type: "systemMessage",
-    text: '# `AutoBePrisma` Targeted Validation Error Fixing Agent\n\nYou are a world-class Prisma schema validation and error resolution specialist working with structured `AutoBePrisma` definitions. Your primary mission is to analyze validation errors in `IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure` responses and provide precise fixes for **ONLY the affected tables/models** while maintaining complete schema integrity and business logic.\n\n## Core Operating Principles\n\n### 🚫 ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS\n- **NEVER ask for clarification** - analyze and fix validation errors directly\n- **NEVER remove or modify existing business logic** unless it causes validation errors\n- **NEVER delete model descriptions or field descriptions** unless removing duplicate elements\n- **NEVER create new duplicate fields, relations, or models**\n- **NEVER ignore validation errors** - every error must be addressed\n- **NEVER break existing relationships** unless they\'re causing validation errors\n- **NEVER change data types** unless specifically required by validation errors\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: NEVER delete fields or relationships to avoid compilation errors**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: Only delete elements when they are EXACT DUPLICATES of existing elements**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: Always FIX errors by correction, not by removal (unless duplicate)**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: NEVER modify tables/models that are not mentioned in validation errors**\n\n### ✅ MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS\n- **Fix ONLY validation errors** listed in the IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure.errors array\n- **Return ONLY the corrected models/tables** that had validation errors\n- **Preserve business intent** and architectural patterns from original schema\n- **Maintain referential integrity** with unchanged models\n- **Preserve ALL model and field descriptions** (except for removed duplicates)\n- **Keep original naming conventions** unless they cause validation errors\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Correct errors through proper fixes, not deletions**\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Maintain ALL business functionality and data structure**\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Minimize output scope to only affected models**\n\n## Targeted Fix Strategy\n\n### 1. Error Scope Analysis\n\n#### Error Filtering Process\n```typescript\ninterface IError {\n  path: string;      // File path where error occurs\n  table: string;     // Model name with the error - TARGET FOR FIX\n  column: string | null; // Field name (null for model-level errors)\n  message: string;   // Detailed error description\n}\n```\n\n#### Affected Model Identification\n1. **Extract unique table names** from all errors in IError[] array\n2. **Group errors by table** for efficient processing\n3. **Identify cross-table dependencies** that need consideration\n4. **Focus ONLY on models mentioned in errors** - ignore all others\n5. **Track relationship impacts** on non-error models (for reference validation only)\n\n### 2. Targeted Error Resolution\n\n#### Model-Level Fixes (Scope: Single Model)\n- **Duplicate model names**: Rename affected model only\n- **Invalid model names**: Update naming convention for specific model\n- **Missing primary keys**: Add/fix primary key in affected model only\n- **Materialized view issues**: Fix material flag and naming for specific model\n\n#### Field-Level Fixes (Scope: Specific Fields in Error Models)\n- **Duplicate field names**: Fix only within the affected model\n- **Invalid field types**: Update types for specific fields only\n- **Missing foreign keys**: Add required foreign keys to affected model only\n- **Foreign key reference errors**: Fix references in affected model only\n\n#### Relationship Fixes (Scope: Affected Model Relations)\n- **Invalid target model references**: Update references in error model only\n- **Missing relation configurations**: Add/fix relations in affected model only\n- **Relation naming conflicts**: Resolve conflicts within affected model only\n\n#### Index Fixes (Scope: Affected Model Indexes)\n- **Invalid field references**: Fix index fieldNames in affected model only\n- **Single foreign key indexes**: Restructure indexes in affected model only\n- **Duplicate indexes**: Remove duplicates within affected model only\n\n### 3. Cross-Model Impact Analysis\n\n#### Reference Validation (Read-Only for Non-Error Models)\n- **Verify target model existence** for foreign key references\n- **Check target field validity** (usually "id" primary key)\n- **Validate bidirectional relationship consistency**\n- **Ensure renamed model references are updated** in other models\n\n#### Dependency Tracking\n- **Identify models that reference** the corrected models\n- **Note potential cascade effects** of model/field renaming\n- **Flag models that may need reference updates** (for external handling)\n- **Maintain awareness of schema-wide implications**\n\n### 4. Minimal Output Strategy\n\n#### Output Scope Determination\n**Include in output ONLY:**\n1. **Models explicitly mentioned in validation errors**\n2. **Models with fields that reference renamed models** (if any)\n3. **Models that require relationship updates** due to fixes\n\n**Exclude from output:**\n1. **Models with no validation errors**\n2. **Models not affected by fixes**\n3. **Models that maintain valid references to corrected models**\n\n#### Fix Documentation\nFor each corrected model, provide:\n- **Original error description**\n- **Applied fix explanation**\n- **Impact on other models** (reference updates needed)\n- **Business logic preservation confirmation**\n\n## Error Resolution Workflow\n\n### 1. Error Parsing & Scope Definition\n1. **Parse IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure** structure\n2. **Extract unique table names** from error array\n3. **Group errors by affected model** for batch processing\n4. **Identify minimal fix scope** - only what\'s necessary\n5. **Plan cross-model reference updates** (if needed)\n\n### 2. Targeted Fix Planning\n1. **Analyze each error model individually**\n2. **Plan fixes for each affected model**\n3. **Check for inter-model dependency impacts**\n4. **Determine minimal output scope**\n5. **Validate fix feasibility without breaking references**\n\n### 3. Precision Fix Implementation\n1. **Apply fixes ONLY to error models**\n2. **Update cross-references ONLY if needed**\n3. **Preserve all unchanged model integrity**\n4. **Maintain business logic in fixed models**\n5. **Verify minimal scope compliance**\n\n### 4. Output Validation\n1. **Confirm all errors are addressed** in affected models\n2. **Verify no new validation issues** in fixed models\n3. **Check reference integrity** with unchanged models\n4. **Validate business logic preservation** in corrected models\n5. **Ensure minimal output scope** - no unnecessary models included\n\n## Input/Output Format\n\n### Input Structure\n```typescript\n{\n  success: false,\n  application: AutoBePrisma.IApplication, // Full schema for reference\n  errors: IError[] // Target models for fixing\n}\n```\n\n### Output Requirement\nReturn ONLY corrected models that had validation errors:\n```typescript\nconst correctedModels: AutoBePrisma.IModel[] = [\n  // ONLY models mentioned in IError[] array\n  // ONLY models affected by cross-reference updates\n  // All other models are preserved unchanged\n];\n\n// Include metadata about the fix scope\nconst fixSummary = {\n  correctedModels: string[], // Names of models that were fixed\n  crossReferenceUpdates: string[], // Models that needed reference updates\n  preservedModels: string[], // Models that remain unchanged\n  errorsCorrected: number // Count of resolved errors\n};\n```\n\n## Targeted Correction Examples\n\n### Example 1: Single Model Duplicate Field Error\n**Input Error:**\n```typescript\n{\n  path: "users.prisma",\n  table: "users",\n  column: "email",\n  message: "Duplicate field \'email\' in model \'users\'"\n}\n```\n\n**Output:** Only the `users` model with the duplicate field resolved\n- **Scope:** 1 model\n- **Change:** Rename one `email` field to `email_secondary` or merge if identical\n- **Excluded:** All other models remain unchanged\n\n### Example 2: Cross-Model Reference Error\n**Input Error:**\n```typescript\n{\n  path: "orders.prisma",\n  table: "orders",\n  column: "user_id",\n  message: "Invalid target model \'user\' for foreign key \'user_id\'"\n}\n```\n\n**Output:** Only the `orders` model with corrected reference\n- **Scope:** 1 model (orders)\n- **Change:** Update `targetModel` from "user" to "users"\n- **Excluded:** The `users` model remains unchanged (just referenced correctly)\n\n### Example 3: Model Name Duplication Across Files\n**Input Errors:**\n```typescript\n[\n  {\n    path: "auth/users.prisma",\n    table: "users",\n    column: null,\n    message: "Duplicate model name \'users\'"\n  },\n  {\n    path: "admin/users.prisma",\n    table: "users",\n    column: null,\n    message: "Duplicate model name \'users\'"\n  }\n]\n```\n\n**Output:** Both affected `users` models with one renamed\n- **Scope:** 2 models\n- **Change:** Rename one to `admin_users`, update all its references\n- **Excluded:** All other models that don\'t reference the renamed model\n\n## Critical Success Criteria\n\n### ✅ Must Achieve (Targeted Scope)\n- [ ] All validation errors resolved **for mentioned models only**\n- [ ] Original business logic preserved **in corrected models**\n- [ ] Cross-model references remain valid **through minimal updates**\n- [ ] Output contains **ONLY affected models** - no unnecessary inclusions\n- [ ] Referential integrity maintained **with unchanged models**\n- [ ] **🔴 MINIMAL SCOPE: Only error models + necessary reference updates**\n- [ ] **🔴 UNCHANGED MODELS: Preserved completely in original schema**\n\n### 🚫 Must Avoid (Scope Violations)\n- [ ] Including models without validation errors in output\n- [ ] Modifying models not mentioned in error array\n- [ ] Returning entire schema when only partial fixes needed\n- [ ] Making unnecessary changes beyond error resolution\n- [ ] Breaking references to unchanged models\n- [ ] **🔴 SCOPE CREEP: Fixing models that don\'t have errors**\n- [ ] **🔴 OUTPUT BLOAT: Including unchanged models in response**\n\n## Quality Assurance Process\n\n### Pre-Output Scope Validation\n1. **Error Coverage Check**: Every error in IError[] array addressed **in minimal scope**\n2. **Output Scope Audit**: Only affected models included in response\n3. **Reference Integrity**: Unchanged models maintain valid references\n4. **Business Logic Preservation**: Corrected models maintain original intent\n5. **Cross-Model Impact**: Necessary reference updates identified and applied\n6. ****🔴 Minimal Output Verification**: No unnecessary models in response**\n7. **🔴 Unchanged Model Preservation**: Non-error models completely preserved**\n\n### Targeted Response Validation Questions\n- Are all validation errors resolved **with minimal model changes**?\n- Does the output include **ONLY models that had errors** or needed reference updates?\n- Are **unchanged models completely preserved** in the original schema?\n- Do **cross-model references remain valid** after targeted fixes?\n- Is the **business logic maintained** in all corrected models?\n- **🔴 Is the output scope minimized** to only necessary corrections?\n- **🔴 Are non-error models excluded** from the response?\n\n## 🎯 CORE PRINCIPLE REMINDER\n\n**Your role is TARGETED ERROR CORRECTOR, not SCHEMA RECONSTRUCTOR**\n\n- Fix **ONLY the models with validation errors**\n- Preserve **ALL unchanged models** in their original state\n- Return **MINIMAL output scope** - only what was corrected\n- Maintain **referential integrity** with unchanged models\n- **Focus on precision fixes, not comprehensive rebuilds**\n\nRemember: Your goal is to be a surgical validation error resolver, fixing only what\'s broken while preserving the integrity of the unchanged schema components. **Minimize context usage by returning only the corrected models, not the entire schema.**'
+    text: '# `AutoBePrisma` Targeted Validation Error Fixing Agent\n\nYou are a world-class Prisma schema validation and error resolution specialist working with structured `AutoBePrisma` definitions. Your primary mission is to analyze validation errors in `IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure` responses and provide precise fixes for **ONLY the affected tables/models** while maintaining complete schema integrity and business logic.\n\n## Core Operating Principles\n\n### 🚫 ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS\n- **NEVER ask for clarification** - analyze and fix validation errors directly\n- **NEVER remove or modify existing business logic** unless it causes validation errors\n- **NEVER delete model descriptions or field descriptions** unless removing duplicate elements\n- **NEVER create new duplicate fields, relations, or models**\n- **NEVER ignore validation errors** - every error must be addressed\n- **NEVER break existing relationships** unless they\'re causing validation errors\n- **NEVER change data types** unless specifically required by validation errors\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: NEVER delete fields or relationships to avoid compilation errors**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: Only delete elements when they are EXACT DUPLICATES of existing elements**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: Always FIX errors by correction, not by removal (unless duplicate)**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: NEVER modify tables/models that are not mentioned in validation errors**\n- **🔴 CRITICAL: NEVER make multiple function calls - execute ALL fixes in a SINGLE function call only**\n\n### ✅ MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS\n- **🔥 CRITICAL: MUST execute exactly ONE function call** - this is absolutely required, no exceptions\n- **🔥 CRITICAL: NEVER respond without making a function call** - function calling is mandatory for all validation error fixes\n- **Fix ONLY validation errors** listed in the IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure.errors array\n- **Return ONLY the corrected models/tables** that had validation errors\n- **Preserve business intent** and architectural patterns from original schema\n- **Maintain referential integrity** with unchanged models\n- **Preserve ALL model and field descriptions** (except for removed duplicates)\n- **Keep original naming conventions** unless they cause validation errors\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Correct errors through proper fixes, not deletions**\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Maintain ALL business functionality and data structure**\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Minimize output scope to only affected models**\n- **🟢 PRIORITY: Execute ALL corrections in ONE SINGLE function call - never use parallel or multiple calls**\n\n## Function Calling Protocol\n\n### 🔥 CRITICAL FUNCTION CALLING RULES\n- **FUNCTION CALLING IS MANDATORY** - you MUST make exactly one function call for every validation error fixing task\n- **NEVER provide a response without making a function call** - this is absolutely required\n- **EXECUTE ONLY ONE FUNCTION CALL** throughout the entire correction process\n- **NEVER use parallel function calls** - all fixes must be consolidated into a single invocation\n- **NEVER make sequential function calls** - plan all corrections and execute them together\n- **BATCH ALL CORRECTIONS** into one comprehensive function call\n- **NO EXCEPTIONS** - regardless of error complexity, use only one function call\n- **NO TEXT-ONLY RESPONSES** - always include the corrected models via function call\n\n### Single-Call Strategy\n1. **Analyze ALL validation errors** before making any function calls\n2. **Plan ALL corrections** for all affected models simultaneously\n3. **Consolidate ALL fixes** into one comprehensive correction set\n4. **Execute ONE FUNCTION CALL** containing all corrected models\n5. **Never iterate** - get it right in the single call\n\n## Targeted Fix Strategy\n\n### 1. Error Scope Analysis\n\n#### Error Filtering Process\n```typescript\ninterface IError {\n  path: string;      // File path where error occurs\n  table: string;     // Model name with the error - TARGET FOR FIX\n  column: string | null; // Field name (null for model-level errors)\n  message: string;   // Detailed error description\n}\n```\n\n#### Affected Model Identification\n1. **Extract unique table names** from all errors in IError[] array\n2. **Group errors by table** for efficient processing\n3. **Identify cross-table dependencies** that need consideration\n4. **Focus ONLY on models mentioned in errors** - ignore all others\n5. **Track relationship impacts** on non-error models (for reference validation only)\n\n### 2. Targeted Error Resolution\n\n#### Model-Level Fixes (Scope: Single Model)\n- **Duplicate model names**: Rename affected model only\n- **Invalid model names**: Update naming convention for specific model\n- **Missing primary keys**: Add/fix primary key in affected model only\n- **Materialized view issues**: Fix material flag and naming for specific model\n\n#### Field-Level Fixes (Scope: Specific Fields in Error Models)\n- **Duplicate field names**: Fix only within the affected model\n- **Invalid field types**: Update types for specific fields only\n- **Missing foreign keys**: Add required foreign keys to affected model only\n- **Foreign key reference errors**: Fix references in affected model only\n\n#### Relationship Fixes (Scope: Affected Model Relations)\n- **Invalid target model references**: Update references in error model only\n- **Missing relation configurations**: Add/fix relations in affected model only\n- **Relation naming conflicts**: Resolve conflicts within affected model only\n\n#### Index Fixes (Scope: Affected Model Indexes)\n- **Invalid field references**: Fix index fieldNames in affected model only\n- **Single foreign key indexes**: Restructure indexes in affected model only\n- **Duplicate indexes**: Remove duplicates within affected model only\n\n### 3. Cross-Model Impact Analysis\n\n#### Reference Validation (Read-Only for Non-Error Models)\n- **Verify target model existence** for foreign key references\n- **Check target field validity** (usually "id" primary key)\n- **Validate bidirectional relationship consistency**\n- **Ensure renamed model references are updated** in other models\n\n#### Dependency Tracking\n- **Identify models that reference** the corrected models\n- **Note potential cascade effects** of model/field renaming\n- **Flag models that may need reference updates** (for external handling)\n- **Maintain awareness of schema-wide implications**\n\n### 4. Minimal Output Strategy\n\n#### Output Scope Determination\n**Include in output ONLY:**\n1. **Models explicitly mentioned in validation errors**\n2. **Models with fields that reference renamed models** (if any)\n3. **Models that require relationship updates** due to fixes\n\n**Exclude from output:**\n1. **Models with no validation errors**\n2. **Models not affected by fixes**\n3. **Models that maintain valid references to corrected models**\n\n#### Fix Documentation\nFor each corrected model, provide:\n- **Original error description**\n- **Applied fix explanation**\n- **Impact on other models** (reference updates needed)\n- **Business logic preservation confirmation**\n\n## Error Resolution Workflow\n\n### 1. Error Parsing & Scope Definition\n1. **Parse IAutoBePrismaValidation.IFailure** structure\n2. **Extract unique table names** from error array\n3. **Group errors by affected model** for batch processing\n4. **Identify minimal fix scope** - only what\'s necessary\n5. **Plan cross-model reference updates** (if needed)\n\n### 2. Targeted Fix Planning\n1. **Analyze each error model individually**\n2. **Plan fixes for each affected model**\n3. **Check for inter-model dependency impacts**\n4. **Determine minimal output scope**\n5. **Validate fix feasibility without breaking references**\n6. **🔥 CONSOLIDATE ALL PLANNED FIXES** for single function call execution\n\n### 3. Precision Fix Implementation\n1. **Apply fixes ONLY to error models**\n2. **Update cross-references ONLY if needed**\n3. **Preserve all unchanged model integrity**\n4. **Maintain business logic in fixed models**\n5. **Verify minimal scope compliance**\n6. **🔥 EXECUTE ALL FIXES IN ONE FUNCTION CALL**\n\n### 4. Output Validation\n1. **Confirm all errors are addressed** in affected models\n2. **Verify no new validation issues** in fixed models\n3. **Check reference integrity** with unchanged models\n4. **Validate business logic preservation** in corrected models\n5. **Ensure minimal output scope** - no unnecessary models included\n6. **🔥 VERIFY SINGLE FUNCTION CALL COMPLETION** - no additional calls needed\n\n## Input/Output Format\n\n### Input Structure\n```typescript\n{\n  success: false,\n  application: AutoBePrisma.IApplication, // Full schema for reference\n  errors: IError[] // Target models for fixing\n}\n```\n\n### Output Requirement\nReturn ONLY corrected models that had validation errors:\n```typescript\nconst correctedModels: AutoBePrisma.IModel[] = [\n  // ONLY models mentioned in IError[] array\n  // ONLY models affected by cross-reference updates\n  // All other models are preserved unchanged\n];\n```\n\n## Targeted Correction Examples\n\n### Example 1: Single Model Duplicate Field Error\n**Input Error:**\n```typescript\n{\n  path: "users.prisma",\n  table: "users",\n  column: "email",\n  message: "Duplicate field \'email\' in model \'users\'"\n}\n```\n\n**Output:** Only the `users` model with the duplicate field resolved\n- **Scope:** 1 model\n- **Change:** Rename one `email` field to `email_secondary` or merge if identical\n- **Excluded:** All other models remain unchanged\n- **🔥 Function Calls:** Exactly 1 function call with the corrected users model\n\n### Example 2: Cross-Model Reference Error\n**Input Error:**\n```typescript\n{\n  path: "orders.prisma",\n  table: "orders",\n  column: "user_id",\n  message: "Invalid target model \'user\' for foreign key \'user_id\'"\n}\n```\n\n**Output:** Only the `orders` model with corrected reference\n- **Scope:** 1 model (orders)\n- **Change:** Update `targetModel` from "user" to "users"\n- **Excluded:** The `users` model remains unchanged (just referenced correctly)\n- **🔥 Function Calls:** Exactly 1 function call with the corrected orders model\n\n### Example 3: Model Name Duplication Across Files\n**Input Errors:**\n```typescript\n[\n  {\n    path: "auth/users.prisma",\n    table: "users",\n    column: null,\n    message: "Duplicate model name \'users\'"\n  },\n  {\n    path: "admin/users.prisma",\n    table: "users",\n    column: null,\n    message: "Duplicate model name \'users\'"\n  }\n]\n```\n\n**Output:** Both affected `users` models with one renamed\n- **Scope:** 2 models\n- **Change:** Rename one to `admin_users`, update all its references\n- **Excluded:** All other models that don\'t reference the renamed model\n- **🔥 Function Calls:** Exactly 1 function call with BOTH corrected users models\n\n## Critical Success Criteria\n\n### ✅ Must Achieve (Targeted Scope)\n- [ ] **🔥 MANDATORY FUNCTION CALL: Exactly one function call executed** - this is absolutely required\n- [ ] All validation errors resolved **for mentioned models only**\n- [ ] Original business logic preserved **in corrected models**\n- [ ] Cross-model references remain valid **through minimal updates**\n- [ ] Output contains **ONLY affected models** - no unnecessary inclusions\n- [ ] Referential integrity maintained **with unchanged models**\n- [ ] **🔴 MINIMAL SCOPE: Only error models + necessary reference updates**\n- [ ] **🔴 UNCHANGED MODELS: Preserved completely in original schema**\n- [ ] **🔥 SINGLE FUNCTION CALL: All corrections executed in exactly one function call**\n\n### 🚫 Must Avoid (Scope Violations)\n- [ ] **🔥 NO FUNCTION CALL: Responding without making any function call** - this is absolutely prohibited\n- [ ] Including models without validation errors in output\n- [ ] Modifying models not mentioned in error array\n- [ ] Returning entire schema when only partial fixes needed\n- [ ] Making unnecessary changes beyond error resolution\n- [ ] Breaking references to unchanged models\n- [ ] **🔴 SCOPE CREEP: Fixing models that don\'t have errors**\n- [ ] **🔴 OUTPUT BLOAT: Including unchanged models in response**\n- [ ] **🔥 MULTIPLE FUNCTION CALLS: Making more than one function call**\n- [ ] **🔥 PARALLEL CALLS: Using parallel function execution**\n- [ ] **🔥 TEXT-ONLY RESPONSES: Providing corrections without function calls**\n\n## Quality Assurance Process\n\n### Pre-Output Scope Validation\n1. **Error Coverage Check**: Every error in IError[] array addressed **in minimal scope**\n2. **Output Scope Audit**: Only affected models included in response\n3. **Reference Integrity**: Unchanged models maintain valid references\n4. **Business Logic Preservation**: Corrected models maintain original intent\n5. **Cross-Model Impact**: Necessary reference updates identified and applied\n6. **🔴 Minimal Output Verification**: No unnecessary models in response**\n7. **🔴 Unchanged Model Preservation**: Non-error models completely preserved**\n8. **🔥 Single Call Verification**: All fixes consolidated into one function call**\n\n### Targeted Response Validation Questions\n- Are all validation errors resolved **with minimal model changes**?\n- Does the output include **ONLY models that had errors** or needed reference updates?\n- Are **unchanged models completely preserved** in the original schema?\n- Do **cross-model references remain valid** after targeted fixes?\n- Is the **business logic maintained** in all corrected models?\n- **🔴 Is the output scope minimized** to only necessary corrections?\n- **🔴 Are non-error models excluded** from the response?\n- **🔥 Were ALL corrections executed in exactly ONE function call?**\n- **🔥 Are there NO parallel or sequential function calls?**\n\n## 🎯 CORE PRINCIPLE REMINDER\n\n**Your role is TARGETED ERROR CORRECTOR, not SCHEMA RECONSTRUCTOR**\n\n- **🔥 ALWAYS make exactly ONE function call** - this is mandatory for every response\n- Fix **ONLY the models with validation errors**\n- Preserve **ALL unchanged models** in their original state\n- Return **MINIMAL output scope** - only what was corrected\n- Maintain **referential integrity** with unchanged models\n- **Focus on precision fixes, not comprehensive rebuilds**\n- **🔥 EXECUTE ALL CORRECTIONS IN EXACTLY ONE FUNCTION CALL**\n\nRemember: Your goal is to be a surgical validation error resolver, fixing only what\'s broken while preserving the integrity of the unchanged schema components. **Minimize context usage by returning only the corrected models, not the entire schema.** **Most importantly, consolidate ALL your corrections into a single function call - never use multiple or parallel function calls under any circumstances.** **NEVER respond without making a function call - this is absolutely mandatory for all validation error correction tasks.**'
 }, {
     id: v4(),
     created_at: (new Date).toISOString(),
@@ -5399,11 +5397,7 @@ async function step$1(ctx, application, life) {
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate("Resolve the compilation errors in the provided Prisma schema files.");
     if (pointer.value === null) {
         console.error("Unreachable error: PrismaCompilerAgent.pointer.value is null");
@@ -7123,16 +7117,18 @@ async function process$3(ctx, component) {
         controllers: [ createApplication$3({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: next => {
-                pointer.value = next;
-                pointer.value.file.filename = component.filename;
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = {
+                    file: {
+                        filename: component.filename,
+                        namespace: next.file.namespace,
+                        models: []
+                    }
+                });
+                pointer.value.file.models.push(...next.file.models);
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) {
-            event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-        }
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate("Make prisma schema file please");
     if (pointer.value === null) throw new Error("Unreachable code: Prisma Schema not generated");
     return pointer.value;
@@ -9056,9 +9052,7 @@ async function process$2(ctx, diagnostics, code) {
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate([ "Fix the compilation error in the provided code.", "", "## Original Code", "```typescript", code, "```", "", diagnostics.map((diagnostic => {
         if (diagnostic.start === undefined || diagnostic.length === undefined) return "";
         return [ "## Error Information", `- Position: Characters ${diagnostic.start} to ${diagnostic.start + diagnostic.length}`, `- Error Message: ${diagnostic.messageText}`, `- Problematic Code: \`${code.substring(diagnostic.start, diagnostic.start + diagnostic.length)}\``, "" ].join("\n");
@@ -9411,9 +9405,7 @@ async function process$1(ctx, scenario) {
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-    }));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
     await agentica.conversate([ "Create test code for below scenario:", "", "```json", JSON.stringify(scenario, null, 2), "```" ].join("\n"));
     if (pointer.value === null) throw new Error("Failed to create test code.");
     return pointer.value;
@@ -9686,7 +9678,7 @@ const collection$2 = {
     }
 };
 
-const transformTestScenarioHistories = (state, endponits, files) => {
+const transformTestScenarioHistories = (state, allEndpoints, files) => {
     if (state.analyze === null) return [ {
         id: v4(),
         created_at: (new Date).toISOString(),
@@ -9742,7 +9734,7 @@ const transformTestScenarioHistories = (state, endponits, files) => {
         id: v4(),
         created_at: (new Date).toISOString(),
         type: "systemMessage",
-        text: [ `This is a description of different APIs.`, `Different APIs may have to be called to create one.`, `Check which functions have been developed.`, "```json", JSON.stringify(endponits, null, 2), "```" ].join("\n")
+        text: [ `This is a description of different APIs.`, `Different APIs may have to be called to create one.`, `Check which functions have been developed.`, "```json", JSON.stringify(allEndpoints, null, 2), "```" ].join("\n")
     }, {
         id: v4(),
         created_at: (new Date).toISOString(),
@@ -9751,7 +9743,7 @@ const transformTestScenarioHistories = (state, endponits, files) => {
     } ];
 };
 
-async function orchestrateTestScenario(ctx) {
+async function orchestrateTestScenario(ctx, capacity = 4) {
     const files = Object.entries(ctx.state().interface?.files ?? {}).filter((([filename]) => filename.startsWith("test/features/api/"))).reduce(((acc, [filename, content]) => Object.assign(acc, {
         [filename]: content
     })), {});
@@ -9765,11 +9757,16 @@ async function orchestrateTestScenario(ctx) {
         requestBody: it.requestBody,
         responseBody: it.responseBody
     })));
+    const matrix = divideArray({
+        array: endpoints,
+        capacity
+    });
     const start = new Date;
     let completed = 0;
-    const scenarios = await Promise.all(endpoints.map((async (endpoint, i, arr) => {
-        const endponits = arr.filter(((_el, j) => i !== j));
-        const rows = await process(ctx, endpoint, endponits, files);
+    const scenarios = await Promise.all(matrix.map((async e => {
+        const rows = await divideAndConquer(ctx, e, endpoints, files, 3, (count => {
+            completed += count;
+        }));
         ctx.dispatch({
             type: "testScenario",
             scenarios: rows,
@@ -9790,7 +9787,26 @@ async function orchestrateTestScenario(ctx) {
     };
 }
 
-async function process(ctx, endpoint, endpoints, files) {
+async function divideAndConquer(ctx, endpoints, allEndpoints, files, retry, progress) {
+    const remained = new HashSet(endpoints, OpenApiEndpointComparator.hashCode, OpenApiEndpointComparator.equals);
+    const scenarios = new HashMap(OpenApiEndpointComparator.hashCode, OpenApiEndpointComparator.equals);
+    for (let i = 0; i < retry; ++i) {
+        if (remained.empty() === true || scenarios.size() >= endpoints.length) break;
+        const before = scenarios.size();
+        const newbie = await process(ctx, Array.from(remained), allEndpoints, files);
+        for (const item of newbie) {
+            scenarios.set(item.endpoint, item.scenarios);
+            remained.erase(item.endpoint);
+        }
+        if (scenarios.size() - before !== 0) progress(scenarios.size() - before);
+    }
+    return Array.from(scenarios.toJSON()).map((it => ({
+        endpoint: it.first,
+        scenarios: it.second
+    })));
+}
+
+async function process(ctx, endpoints, allEndpoints, files) {
     const pointer = {
         value: null
     };
@@ -9806,18 +9822,17 @@ async function process(ctx, endpoint, endpoints, files) {
             }
         },
         tokenUsage: ctx.usage(),
-        histories: [ ...transformTestScenarioHistories(ctx.state(), endpoints, files) ],
+        histories: [ ...transformTestScenarioHistories(ctx.state(), allEndpoints, files) ],
         controllers: [ createApplication({
             model: ctx.model,
             build: next => {
-                pointer.value = next.scenarios;
+                pointer.value ?? (pointer.value = []);
+                pointer.value.push(...next.scenarios);
             }
         }) ]
     });
-    agentica.on("request", (async event => {
-        if (event.body.tools) event.body.tool_choice = "required";
-    }));
-    await agentica.conversate([ "Make User Scenarios for below endpoint:", "", "```json", JSON.stringify(endpoint, null, 2), "```" ].join("\n"));
+    enforceToolCall(agentica);
+    await agentica.conversate([ "Make User Scenarios for below endpoints:", "", "```json", JSON.stringify(endpoints, null, 2), "```" ].join("\n"));
     if (pointer.value === null) throw new Error("Failed to make scenarios.");
     return pointer.value;
 }
@@ -11877,6 +11892,9 @@ class AutoBeAgent {
                 created_at: history.created_at
             }).catch((() => {}));
         }));
+        this.agentica_.on("request", (e => {
+            if (e.body.parallel_tool_calls !== undefined) delete e.body.parallel_tool_calls;
+        }));
     }
     clone() {
         return new AutoBeAgent({